LUQ: Long-text Uncertainty Quantification for LLMs
Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:IWWHYSRNrecord.jsonopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capability in a variety of NLP tasks. However, LLMs are also prone to generate nonfactual content. Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) is pivotal in enhancing our understanding of a model's confidence on its generation, thereby aiding in the mitigation of nonfactual outputs. Existing research on UQ predominantly targets short text generation, typically yielding brief, word-limited responses. However, real-world applications frequently necessitate much longer responses. Our study first highlights the limitations of current UQ methods in handling long text generation. We then introduce \textsc{Luq} and its two variations, a series of novel sampling-based UQ approaches specifically designed for long text. Our findings reveal that \textsc{Luq} outperforms existing baseline methods in correlating with the model's factuality scores (negative coefficient of -0.85 observed for Gemini Pro). To further improve the factuality of LLM responses, we propose \textsc{Luq-Ensemble}, a method that ensembles responses from multiple models and selects the response with the lowest uncertainty. The ensembling method greatly improves the response factuality upon the best standalone LLM.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Why Semantic Entropy Fails: Geometry-Aware and Calibrated Uncertainty for Policy Optimization
Identifies two gaps in entropy-based uncertainty for LLM post-training and proposes GCPO to align geometry-aware disagreement measures with reward-based calibration for better gradient regulation.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.