Evidence of Learned Look-Ahead in a Chess-Playing Neural Network
pith:J7U2XYFAopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
Do neural networks learn to implement algorithms such as look-ahead or search "in the wild"? Or do they rely purely on collections of simple heuristics? We present evidence of learned look-ahead in the policy network of Leela Chess Zero, the currently strongest neural chess engine. We find that Leela internally represents future optimal moves and that these representations are crucial for its final output in certain board states. Concretely, we exploit the fact that Leela is a transformer that treats every chessboard square like a token in language models, and give three lines of evidence (1) activations on certain squares of future moves are unusually important causally; (2) we find attention heads that move important information "forward and backward in time," e.g., from squares of future moves to squares of earlier ones; and (3) we train a simple probe that can predict the optimal move 2 turns ahead with 92% accuracy (in board states where Leela finds a single best line). These findings are an existence proof of learned look-ahead in neural networks and might be a step towards a better understanding of their capabilities.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
A Close Look At World Model Recovery In Supervised Fine-Tuned LLM Planners
Supervised fine-tuning lets LLMs linearly encode action validity and state predicates, with broader state-space coverage during training improving world-model recovery.
-
A Systematic Study of Behavioral Cloning for Scientific Data Annotation
Introduces 9 synthetic annotation tasks and benchmarks for behavioral cloning, finding hierarchical skill learning, scaling benefits, effective multi-task pretraining, and shared internal representations of task phase...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.