The BiGGen Bench: A Principled Benchmark for Fine-grained Evaluation of Language Models with Language Models
Reviewed by Pithpith:ZVGSGVCIopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
As language models (LMs) become capable of handling a wide range of tasks, their evaluation is becoming as challenging as their development. Most generation benchmarks currently assess LMs using abstract evaluation criteria like helpfulness and harmlessness, which often lack the flexibility and granularity of human assessment. Additionally, these benchmarks tend to focus disproportionately on specific capabilities such as instruction following, leading to coverage bias. To overcome these limitations, we introduce the BiGGen Bench, a principled generation benchmark designed to thoroughly evaluate nine distinct capabilities of LMs across 77 diverse tasks. A key feature of the BiGGen Bench is its use of instance-specific evaluation criteria, closely mirroring the nuanced discernment of human evaluation. We apply this benchmark to assess 103 frontier LMs using five evaluator LMs. Our code, data, and evaluation results are all publicly available at https://github.com/prometheus-eval/prometheus-eval/tree/main/BiGGen-Bench.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
CoEval: Ranking Language Models for Custom Tasks Without Labeled Data or Trustworthy Benchmarks
CoEval generates task-specific benchmarks by rotating models through teacher, student, and judge roles, then weights questions by discriminative power and judges by panel consensus to recover accurate model rankings w...
-
Evalet: Evaluating Large Language Models through Functional Fragmentation
Evalet applies functional fragmentation to deliver fragment-level qualitative analysis of LLM evaluations, with a user study showing 48% more misalignment detections than holistic scoring.
-
Detecting Unfaithful Chain-of-Thought via Circuit-Guided Internal-External Discrepancy
CIE-Scorer detects unfaithful CoT by tracing compact sentence-level circuits, building internal-external reasoning graphs, and scoring their discrepancy with Fused Gromov-Wasserstein distance, reporting SOTA results o...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.