pith. sign in

arxiv: 2407.04097 · v1 · submitted 2024-07-04 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE

Simulating FRB Morphologies and Coherent Phase Correlation Signatures from Multi-Plane Astrophysical Lensing

Zarif Kader , Matt Dobbs , Calvin Leung , Kiyoshi W. Masui , Mawson W. Sammons This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 23:06 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE
keywords fast radio burstsFRB lensingmulti-plane lensingphase coherencesimulationgravitational lensingplasma lensingmorphology
0
0 comments X

The pith

A simulation tool uses phase-coherent geometric optics to model how multi-plane lensing alters FRB time-frequency shapes and phase correlations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a simulation that computes coherent propagation transfer functions on a spatial grid to produce lensed images of fast radio bursts. Each image carries a time delay and magnification that reshape the observed burst, while interference between images can reduce phase coherence and affect correlation searches. Analytic test cases confirm the tool reproduces expected qualitative behavior, and multi-plane examples illustrate its use for realistic lensing geometries. If the approach holds, observers can predict the signatures that gravitational or plasma lenses imprint on point-like FRB sources.

Core claim

The simulation generates lensing morphologies through coherent propagation transfer functions from phase coherent geometric optics on a spatial grid, with each image acquiring a time delay and magnification that changes the emitted frequency-temporal structure, and with image interference able to decohere observed phase properties.

What carries the argument

Coherent propagation transfer functions generated by phase coherent geometric optics on a spatial grid

If this is right

  • Each lensed image acquires a distinct time delay and magnification that modifies the observed frequency-temporal morphology of the FRB.
  • Interference among images can decohere the phase properties, affecting searches that rely on auto-correlation of the observed voltage.
  • Analytic test cases confirm the simulation reproduces qualitative lensing properties.
  • Example multi-plane systems demonstrate the tool's ability to produce lensed FRB morphologies and phase-coherence signatures.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same grid-based transfer functions could be applied to other compact radio sources such as pulsars to test consistency across source types.
  • Survey pipelines could incorporate the simulated templates to flag candidate lensed events before full voltage data are analyzed.
  • Extending the grid resolution or adding stochastic plasma screens would allow direct comparison with real scattering tails in FRB data.

Load-bearing premise

An FRB can be treated as a point source so that all ray paths from source to observer remain phase coherent.

What would settle it

A set of observed FRB voltage time series whose auto-correlation signatures fail to match the simulated interference patterns for any plausible multi-plane lens geometry would falsify the model's phase-coherence predictions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2407.04097 by Calvin Leung, Kiyoshi W. Masui, Matt Dobbs, Mawson W. Sammons, Zarif Kader.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Illustrative diagram of a multi-plane lensing system. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Simulated waterfall (left) and time-lag correlation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Fractional error in the magnification, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Fractional error in the magnification, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Simulated waterfall (left) and time-lag correlation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. In the left panels, the distribution (blue line) of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. The fit (black) of an exponential pulse profile to the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Simulated waterfall (left) and time-lag correlation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Simulated waterfall (left) and time-lag correlation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Simulated waterfall (left) and time-lag correlation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Simulated waterfall (left) and time-lag correlation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. Simulated angular position of images generated for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_14.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs), like pulsars, display radio emission from compact regions such that they can be treated as point sources. As this radiation propagates through space, they encounter sources of lensing such as a gravitational field of massive objects or inhomogeneous changes in the electron density of cold plasma. We have developed a simulation tool to generate these lensing morphologies through coherent propagation transfer functions generated by phase coherent geometric optics on a spatial grid. In the limit an FRB can be treated as a point source, the ray paths from the FRB to the observer are phase coherent. Each image will have a time delay and magnification that will alter the emitted frequency-temporal morphology of the FRB to that which is observed. The interference of these images could also decohere the observed phase properties of the images, affecting any phase related searches such as searching for the auto-correlation of the observed FRB voltage with other images in time. We present analytic test cases to demonstrate that the simulation can model qualitative properties. We provide example multi-plane lensing systems to show the capabilities of the simulation in modeling the lensed morphology of an FRB and observed phase coherence.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper claims to have developed a simulation tool to generate lensing morphologies of FRBs through coherent propagation transfer functions using phase coherent geometric optics on a spatial grid. It states that for point-source FRBs, ray paths are phase coherent, leading to altered morphologies due to time delays and magnifications, and potential decoherence of phase properties. Analytic test cases are presented for qualitative validation, and example multi-plane lensing systems are provided to demonstrate capabilities.

Significance. If the geometric optics approximation is appropriate, this simulation tool could provide a useful forward-modeling capability for interpreting lensed FRB observations, particularly regarding morphology and phase coherence signatures. The work is primarily a methods paper focused on tool development rather than new physical insights.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that analytic test cases demonstrate the simulation models qualitative properties is not supported by any quantitative validation, error analysis, or comparison to analytic or wave-optics solutions.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: The assumption that ray paths from the FRB to the observer are phase coherent in the point-source limit is stated without providing a regime of validity or discussion of when wave-optics effects (e.g., diffraction) become important at radio wavelengths for multi-plane lensing.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: Minor grammatical issue: 'such as a gravitational field of massive objects' should read 'such as the gravitational fields of massive objects'.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive review of our manuscript. We address the two major comments point by point below and will incorporate revisions to strengthen the presentation of validation and the regime of validity for the geometric optics approach.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that analytic test cases demonstrate the simulation models qualitative properties is not supported by any quantitative validation, error analysis, or comparison to analytic or wave-optics solutions.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the validation presented is qualitative, as stated in the abstract. To address this, the revised manuscript will include quantitative error analysis for the analytic test cases, such as measured deviations in image positions, magnifications, and time delays relative to known analytic lensing solutions. Direct numerical comparison to full wave-optics calculations lies outside the scope of the geometric-optics method developed here; we will instead add an explicit statement of this limitation. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The assumption that ray paths from the FRB to the observer are phase coherent in the point-source limit is stated without providing a regime of validity or discussion of when wave-optics effects (e.g., diffraction) become important at radio wavelengths for multi-plane lensing.

    Authors: This is a fair criticism. The revised manuscript will add a dedicated paragraph (or subsection) that specifies the regime of validity for the phase-coherent geometric-optics approximation. This will include the condition that the Fresnel scale remains much smaller than the transverse scales of the lenses, together with order-of-magnitude estimates for typical FRB observing frequencies (0.1–10 GHz) and common multi-plane lensing geometries to indicate when diffraction effects are expected to become non-negligible. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: forward-modeling simulation with independent geometric-optics implementation

full rationale

The paper describes a simulation tool that generates lensing morphologies via phase-coherent geometric optics on a spatial grid, under the explicit point-source assumption. No parameters are fitted to data and then relabeled as predictions; no self-citation chain is invoked to justify a uniqueness theorem or ansatz; analytic test cases are presented for qualitative validation rather than as a closed loop. The central claim is a forward-modeling capability whose correctness can be checked against external wave-optics benchmarks or observations, satisfying the criteria for a self-contained, non-circular derivation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The model rests on standard domain assumptions about point-source treatment and geometric optics; no free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption FRBs can be treated as point sources such that ray paths are phase coherent
    Explicitly stated as the operating limit of the simulation in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5757 in / 1141 out tokens · 18343 ms · 2026-05-23T23:06:36.528960+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Probing Collapsed Dark Matter Halos with Fast Radio Bursts

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Core-collapsed SIDM halos produce longer FRB image time delays than CDM halos, enabling future surveys to constrain self-interaction cross sections above roughly 18-40 cm²/g depending on collapse timing.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 16 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    For each plane 2 we have an achromatic lensing function, Φ i(xi)

    We create an Nx × Nx grid to parameterize the multiple lens planes, xi. For each plane 2 we have an achromatic lensing function, Φ i(xi). The array is made to be contiguous

    work page

  2. [2]

    For computation, we run simulations in parallel over the frequency array

    We create another array of Nf frequencies to be evaluated. For computation, we run simulations in parallel over the frequency array

    work page

  3. [3]

    These quantities are, respectively, needed to determine the station- ary points and eigenvalues of the Hessian for each frequency 3

    We compute the gradient for each of the lens func- tions ∂i aΦi and the quantities ∂i 11Φi + ∂i 22Φi ±p (∂i 11Φi − ∂i 22Φi)2 + 4(∂i 12Φi)2. These quantities are, respectively, needed to determine the station- ary points and eigenvalues of the Hessian for each frequency 3

    work page

  4. [4]

    In parallel for each of the Nf frequencies, we per- form a grid search for the stationary points. The images are found as follows, starting from the last lens plane N with a given source position x′S and iterating to the first lens plane: (a) For plane i, there is a set of source points x′i+1. A stationary point is identified if the gradient of the Fermat...

    work page

  5. [5]

    re- solved

    To obtain the total propagation transfer function, equation 14, all stationary paths for a given fre- quency are summed to obtain a singular trans- fer function, H(f) = PNl l H(γl, f). This is done assuming the image separations are less than the beam width, i.e. all the images are spatially unre- solved by the telescope. Separately, the simulation tool c...

    work page 2001

  6. [6]

    The only problem, in this case, occurs when the achro- matic delay response is decohered such that the gravita- tional lens would be degenerate with a plasma lens. For the use of FRBs to probe the universe for compact dark matter, especially between the 1 − 10M⊙ region of interest for primordial black holes (PBHs) [52], this sug- gests that FRBs are more ...

    work page

  7. [7]

    Petroff, J

    E. Petroff, J. W. T. Hessels, and D. R. Lorimer, A&A Rev. 30, 2 (2022), arXiv:2107.10113 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2022

  8. [8]

    J. M. Cordes and S. Chatterjee, ARA&A 57, 417 (2019), arXiv:1906.05878 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2019

  9. [9]

    S. P. Tendulkar, C. G. Bassa, J. M. Cordes, G. C. Bower, C. J. Law, S. Chatterjee, E. A. K. Adams, S. Bog- danov, S. Burke-Spolaor, B. J. Butler, P. Demorest, J. W. T. Hessels, V. M. Kaspi, T. J. W. Lazio, N. Mad- dox, B. Marcote, M. A. McLaughlin, Z. Paragi, S. M. Ransom, P. Scholz, A. Seymour, L. G. Spitler, H. J. van Langevelde, and R. S. Wharton, ApJ ...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  10. [10]

    C. D. Bochenek, V. Ravi, K. V. Belov, G. Hallinan, J. Kocz, S. R. Kulkarni, and D. L. McKenna, Nature 587, 59 (2020), arXiv:2005.10828 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2020

  11. [11]

    Amiri, B

    CHIME/FRB Collaboration, M. Amiri, B. C. Andersen, K. Bandura, S. Berger, M. Bhardwaj, M. M. Boyce, P. J. Boyle, C. Brar, D. Breitman, T. Cassanelli, P. Chawla, T. Chen, J. F. Cliche, A. Cook, D. Cubranic, A. P. Curtin, M. Deng, M. Dobbs, F. A. Dong, G. Eadie, M. Fandino, E. Fonseca, B. M. Gaensler, U. Giri, D. C. Good, M. Halpern, A. S. Hill, G. Hinshaw,...

    work page arXiv 2021

  12. [12]

    Kader, C

    Z. Kader, C. Leung, M. Dobbs, K. W. Masui, D. Michilli, J. Mena-Parra, R. McKinven, C. Ng, K. Bandura, M. Bhardwaj, C. Brar, T. Cassanelli, P. Chawla, F. A. Dong, D. Good, V. Kaspi, A. E. Lanman, H.-H. Lin, B. W. Meyers, A. B. Pearlman, U.-L. Pen, E. Petroff, Z. Pleunis, M. Rafiei-Ravandi, M. Rahman, P. Sang- havi, P. Scholz, K. Shin, S. Siegel, K. M. Smi...

    work page arXiv 2022

  13. [13]

    Leung, Z

    C. Leung, Z. Kader, K. W. Masui, M. Dobbs, D. Michilli, J. Mena-Parra, R. Mckinven, C. Ng, K. Bandura, M. Bhardwaj, C. Brar, T. Cassanelli, P. Chawla, F. A. Dong, D. Good, V. Kaspi, A. E. Lanman, H.-H. Lin, B. W. Meyers, A. B. Pearlman, U.-L. Pen, E. Petroff, Z. Pleunis, M. Rafiei-Ravandi, M. Rahman, P. Sanghavi, P. Scholz, K. Shin, S. Siegel, K. M. Smith...

    work page arXiv 2022

  14. [14]

    A. Katz, J. Kopp, S. Sibiryakov, and W. Xue, MNRAS 496, 564 (2020), arXiv:1912.07620 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2020

  15. [15]

    Nanolensed fast Radio Bursts

    D. Eichler, ApJ 850, 159 (2017), arXiv:1711.04764 [astro- ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  16. [16]

    D. L. Jow, S. Foreman, U.-L. Pen, and W. Zhu, MNRAS 497, 4956 (2020), arXiv:2002.01570 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2020

  17. [17]

    J. M. Cordes, A. Pidwerbetsky, and R. V. E. Lovelace, ApJ 310, 737 (1986)

    work page 1986

  18. [18]

    B. J. Rickett, ARA&A 15, 479 (1977)

    work page 1977

  19. [19]

    Feldbrugge, U.-L

    J. Feldbrugge, U.-L. Pen, and N. Turok, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1909.04632 (2019), arXiv:1909.04632 [astro- ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 1909

  20. [20]

    Wave asymptotics and their application to astrophysical plasma lensing

    G. Grillo and J. Cordes, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1810.09058 (2018), arXiv:1810.09058 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  21. [21]

    D. L. Jow, U.-L. Pen, and J. Feldbrugge, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2204.12004 (2022), arXiv:2204.12004 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2022

  22. [22]

    M. A. Walker, D. B. Melrose, D. R. Stinebring, and C. M. Zhang, MNRAS 354, 43 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0403587 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  23. [23]

    J. M. Cordes, B. J. Rickett, D. R. Stinebring, and W. A. Coles, ApJ 637, 346 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0407072 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  24. [24]

    W. A. Coles, B. J. Rickett, J. J. Gao, G. Hobbs, and J. P. W. Verbiest, ApJ717, 1206 (2010), arXiv:1005.4914 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  25. [25]

    D. J. Reardon, W. A. Coles, M. Bailes, N. D. R. Bhat, S. Dai, G. B. Hobbs, M. Kerr, R. N. Manchester, S. Os lowski, A. Parthasarathy, C. J. Russell, R. M. Shan- non, R. Spiewak, L. Toomey, A. V. Tuntsov, W. van Straten, M. A. Walker, J. Wang, L. Zhang, and X.-J. Zhu, ApJ 904, 104 (2020), arXiv:2009.12757 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2020

  26. [26]

    Sprenger, R

    T. Sprenger, R. Main, O. Wucknitz, G. Mall, and 21 J. Wu, MNRAS 515, 6198 (2022), arXiv:2204.13985 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2022

  27. [27]

    Z.-W. Wu, R. A. Main, W.-W. Zhu, B. Zhang, P. Jiang, J.-R. Niu, J.-L. Han, D. Li, K.-J. Lee, D.-Z. Li, Y.-P. Yang, F.-Y. Wang, R. Luo, P. Wang, C.-H. Niu, H. Xu, B.-J. Wang, W.-Y. Wang, Y.-K. Zhang, Y. Feng, D.-J. Zhou, Y.-H. Xu, C.-M. Deng, and Y.-H. Zhu, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy 67, 219512 (2024), arXiv:2304.14697 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2024

  28. [28]

    Dense magnetized plasma associated with a fast radio burst

    K. Masui, H.-H. Lin, J. Sievers, C. J. Anderson, T.-C. Chang, X. Chen, A. Ganguly, M. Jarvis, C.-Y. Kuo, Y.- C. Li, Y.-W. Liao, M. McLaughlin, U.-L. Pen, J. B. Pe- terson, A. Roman, P. T. Timbie, T. Voytek, and J. K. Yadav, Nature 528, 523 (2015), arXiv:1512.00529 [astro- ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  29. [29]

    M. W. Sammons, A. T. Deller, M. Glowacki, K. Gourdji, C. W. James, J. X. Prochaska, H. Qiu, D. R. Scott, R. M. Shannon, and C. M. Trott, MNRAS 525, 5653 (2023), arXiv:2305.11477 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2023

  30. [30]

    D. C. Backer, T. Wong, and J. Valanju, ApJ 543, 740 (2000), arXiv:astro-ph/0006220 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  31. [31]

    W. F. Brisken, J. P. Macquart, J. J. Gao, B. J. Rickett, W. A. Coles, A. T. Deller, S. J. Tingay, and C. J. West, ApJ 708, 232 (2010), arXiv:0910.5654 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  32. [32]

    M. Kerr, W. A. Coles, C. A. Ward, S. Johnston, A. V. Tuntsov, and R. M. Shannon, MNRAS 474, 4637 (2018), arXiv:1712.00426 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  33. [33]

    H. Zhu, D. Baker, U.-L. Pen, D. R. Stinebring, and M. H. van Kerkwijk, ApJ 950, 109 (2023), arXiv:2208.06884 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2023

  34. [34]

    J. M. Cordes, I. Wasserman, J. W. T. Hessels, T. J. W. Lazio, S. Chatterjee, and R. S. Wharton, ApJ 842, 35 (2017), arXiv:1703.06580 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  35. [35]

    Wucknitz, L

    O. Wucknitz, L. G. Spitler, and U. L. Pen, A&A 645, A44 (2021), arXiv:2004.11643 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2021

  36. [36]

    A. Tsai, D. L. Jow, D. Baker, and U.-L. Pen, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2308.10830 (2023), arXiv:2308.10830 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page arXiv 2023

  37. [37]

    R. Main, M. van Kerkwijk, U.-L. Pen, N. Mahajan, and K. Vanderlinde, ApJ 840, L15 (2017), arXiv:1703.05176 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  38. [38]

    Kumar, P

    P. Kumar, P. Beniamini, O. Gupta, and J. M. Cordes, MNRAS 527, 457 (2024), arXiv:2307.15294 [astro- ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2024

  39. [39]

    T. T. Nakamura and S. Deguchi, Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement 133, 137 (1999)

    work page 1999

  40. [40]

    Leung, D

    C. Leung, D. Jow, P. Saha, L. Dai, M. Oguri, and L. V. E. Koopmans, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2304.01202 (2023), arXiv:2304.01202 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2023

  41. [41]

    Schneider, J

    P. Schneider, J. Ehlers, and E. E. Falco, Gravitational Lenses (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1992)

    work page 1992

  42. [42]

    Feldbrugge, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomi- cal Society 520, 2995 (2023)

    J. Feldbrugge, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomi- cal Society 520, 2995 (2023)

    work page 2023

  43. [43]

    Blandford and R

    R. Blandford and R. Narayan, ApJ 310, 568 (1986)

    work page 1986

  44. [44]

    A. W. Clegg, A. L. Fey, and T. J. W. Lazio, ApJ 496, 253 (1998), arXiv:astro-ph/9709249 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  45. [45]

    A. O. Petters, Journal of Mathematical Physics 33, 1915 (1992), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jmp/article- pdf/33/5/1915/19284658/1915 1 online.pdf

    work page 1915

  46. [46]

    Schoen, C

    E. Schoen, C. Leung, K. Masui, D. Michilli, P. Chawla, A. B. Pearlman, K. Shin, A. Stock, and C. Collaboration, Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society 5, 271 (2021), arXiv:2111.08753 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2021

  47. [47]

    Narayan, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal So- ciety of London Series A 341, 151 (1992)

    R. Narayan, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal So- ciety of London Series A 341, 151 (1992)

    work page 1992

  48. [48]

    Michilli, K

    D. Michilli, K. W. Masui, R. Mckinven, D. Cubranic, M. Bruneault, C. Brar, C. Patel, P. J. Boyle, I. H. Stairs, A. Renard, K. Bandura, S. Berger, D. Breitman, T. Cas- sanelli, M. Dobbs, V. M. Kaspi, C. Leung, J. Mena- Parra, Z. Pleunis, L. Russell, P. Scholz, S. R. Siegel, S. P. Tendulkar, and K. Vanderlinde, ApJ 910, 147 (2021), arXiv:2010.06748 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2021

  49. [49]

    ICE-based Custom Full-Mesh Network for the CHIME High Bandwidth Radio Astronomy Correlator

    K. Bandura, J. F. Cliche, M. A. Dobbs, A. J. Gilbert, D. Ittah, J. Mena Parra, and G. Smecher, Journal of Astronomical Instrumentation 5, 1641004 (2016), arXiv:1608.04347 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  50. [50]

    L. C. Lee and J. R. Jokipii, ApJ 196, 695 (1975)

    work page 1975

  51. [51]

    R. L. Fiedler, B. Dennison, K. J. Johnston, and A. Hewish, Nature 326, 675 (1987)

    work page 1987

  52. [52]

    Graham Smith, A

    F. Graham Smith, A. G. Lyne, and C. Jordan, MNRAS 410, 499 (2011), arXiv:1008.4494 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2011

  53. [53]

    D. L. Jow, U.-L. Pen, and D. Baker, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2301.08344 (2023), arXiv:2301.08344 [astro- ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2023

  54. [54]

    E. E. Salpeter, ApJ 147, 433 (1967)

    work page 1967

  55. [55]

    M. A. Walker, L. V. E. Koopmans, D. R. Stine- bring, and W. van Straten, MNRAS 388, 1214 (2008), arXiv:0801.4183 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  56. [56]

    I. P. Williamson, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Lon- don Series A 342, 131 (1975)

    work page 1975

  57. [57]

    Kumar and P

    P. Kumar and P. Beniamini, MNRAS 520, 247 (2023), arXiv:2208.03332 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2023

  58. [58]

    J. B. Mu˜ noz, E. D. Kovetz, L. Dai, and M. Kamionkowski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 091301 (2016), arXiv:1605.00008 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016