The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2409.06997 · v2 · pith:OTNSWV7X · submitted 2024-09-11 · cs.LG · cs.AI

What is the Right Notion of Distance between Predict-then-Optimize Tasks?

Reviewed by Pithpith:OTNSWV7Xopen to challenge →

classification cs.LG cs.AI
keywords distancedatasetmodeltasksadaptationdatasetsdistancesdownstream
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Comparing datasets is a fundamental task in machine learning, essential for various learning paradigms-from evaluating train and test datasets for model generalization to using dataset similarity for detecting data drift. While traditional notions of dataset distances offer principled measures of similarity, their utility has largely been assessed through prediction error minimization. However, in Predict-then-Optimize (PtO) frameworks, where predictions serve as inputs for downstream optimization tasks, model performance is measured through decision regret rather than prediction error. In this work, we propose OTD$^3$ (Optimal Transport Decision-aware Dataset Distance), a novel dataset distance that incorporates downstream decisions in addition to features and labels. We show that traditional feature-label distances lack informativeness in PtO settings, while OTD$^3$ more effectively captures adaptation success. We also derive a PtO-specific adaptation bound based on this distance. Empirically, we show that our proposed distance accurately predicts model transferability across three different PtO tasks from the literature. The code is available at https://github.com/paularodr/OTD3.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. ASSS: A Differentiable Adversarial Framework for Task-Aware Data Reduction

    cs.LG 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    ASSS uses an adversarial selector and Gumbel-Softmax relaxation to retain 98.9% task performance with only 30% of the data by preferentially keeping boundary samples.

  2. Decision-Focused Learning: When and Why Traditional Prediction Models Fail

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    A tutorial reviewing why traditional prediction models often fail to improve decision quality in stochastic optimization and summarizing key properties and tools of decision-focused learning.