Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

EVOLvE: Evaluating and Optimizing LLMs For In-Context Exploration

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.06238 v2 pith:XYVHGNYV submitted 2024-10-08 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CL

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CL
keywords explorationllmsoptimalmanymodelsabilityalgorithmalgorithms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Despite their success in many domains, large language models (LLMs) remain under-studied in scenarios requiring optimal decision-making under uncertainty. This is crucial as many real-world applications, ranging from personalized recommendations to healthcare interventions, demand that LLMs not only predict but also actively learn to make optimal decisions through exploration. In this work, we measure LLMs' (in)ability to make optimal decisions in bandits, a state-less reinforcement learning setting relevant to many applications. We develop a comprehensive suite of environments, including both context-free and contextual bandits with varying task difficulties, to benchmark LLMs' performance. Motivated by the existence of optimal exploration algorithms, we propose efficient ways to integrate this algorithmic knowledge into LLMs: by providing explicit algorithm-guided support during inference; and through algorithm distillation via in-context demonstrations and fine-tuning, using synthetic data generated from these algorithms. Impressively, these techniques allow us to achieve superior exploration performance with smaller models, surpassing larger models on various tasks. We conducted an extensive ablation study to shed light on various factors, such as task difficulty and data representation, that influence the efficiency of LLM exploration. Additionally, we conduct a rigorous analysis of the LLM's exploration efficiency using the concept of regret, linking its ability to explore to the model size and underlying algorithm.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. ABBEL: Learning Natural-Language Belief States for Memory-Efficient Interaction

    cs.CL 2025-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    ABBEL trains LLM agents to act from a compact natural-language belief state; belief-quality and brevity rewards close most of the gap with full-context agents.

  2. PACEvolve++: Improving Test-time Learning for Evolutionary Search Agents

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    PACEvolve++ uses a phase-adaptive reinforcement learning advisor to decouple hypothesis selection from execution in LLM-driven evolutionary search, delivering faster convergence than prior frameworks on load balancing...

Pith tools