Using Generative AI and Multi-Agents to Provide Automatic Feedback
Reviewed by Pithpith:4BRQO4MZopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
This study investigates the use of generative AI and multi-agent systems to provide automatic feedback in educational contexts, particularly for student constructed responses in science assessments. The research addresses a key gap in the field by exploring how multi-agent systems, called AutoFeedback, can improve the quality of GenAI-generated feedback, overcoming known issues such as over-praise and over-inference that are common in single-agent large language models (LLMs). The study developed a multi-agent system consisting of two AI agents: one for generating feedback and another for validating and refining it. The system was tested on a dataset of 240 student responses, and its performance was compared to that of a single-agent LLM. Results showed that AutoFeedback significantly reduced the occurrence of over-praise and over-inference errors, providing more accurate and pedagogically sound feedback. The findings suggest that multi-agent systems can offer a more reliable solution for generating automated feedback in educational settings, highlighting their potential for scalable and personalized learning support. These results have important implications for educators and researchers seeking to leverage AI in formative assessments, offering a pathway to more effective feedback mechanisms that enhance student learning outcomes.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
More than a Judge: An Empirical Study of Agent-Human Interaction in Crowdsourced Testing Assessment
A four-stage human-subject study finds that agent-generated feedback on test reports leads to better revisions, improved first submissions on new tasks, and partial transfer of reporting practices across three real-wo...
-
Whose Good, Whose Place? The Moral Geography of Agentic AI for Social Good
Survey of 112 agentic AI for social good papers reveals moral-geographic asymmetry with 73% lacking geographic context (lowest for SDG 16) and only 25% reporting deployments.
-
Evaluating Multi-turn Human-AI Interaction
Introduces the TCR framework to evaluate educational LLM assistants on transparency, consistency, and refinement in multi-turn interactions, complementing aggregate metrics.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.