The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2412.00281 · v1 · pith:RAKN5VB5 · submitted 2024-11-29 · cs.AI

Streamlining the review process: AI-generated annotations in research manuscripts

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:RAKN5VB5record.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.AI
keywords reviewllmsprocessreviewersacademicai-humanannotategptannotation
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

The increasing volume of research paper submissions poses a significant challenge to the traditional academic peer-review system, leading to an overwhelming workload for reviewers. This study explores the potential of integrating Large Language Models (LLMs) into the peer-review process to enhance efficiency without compromising effectiveness. We focus on manuscript annotations, particularly excerpt highlights, as a potential area for AI-human collaboration. While LLMs excel in certain tasks like aspect coverage and informativeness, they often lack high-level analysis and critical thinking, making them unsuitable for replacing human reviewers entirely. Our approach involves using LLMs to assist with specific aspects of the review process. This paper introduces AnnotateGPT, a platform that utilizes GPT-4 for manuscript review, aiming to improve reviewers' comprehension and focus. We evaluate AnnotateGPT using a Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) questionnaire with nine participants and generalize the findings. Our work highlights annotation as a viable middle ground for AI-human collaboration in academic review, offering insights into integrating LLMs into the review process and tuning traditional annotation tools for LLM incorporation.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.