pith. sign in

arxiv: 2412.05677 · v1 · submitted 2024-12-07 · ⚛️ physics.optics

High SNR 3D Imaging from Millimeter-scale Thick Tissues to Cellular Dynamics via Structured Illumination Microscopy

Mengrui Wang , Manming Shu , Jiajing Yan , Chang Liu , Xiangda Fu , Jingxiang Zhang , Yuchen Lin , Hu Zhao
show 8 more authors
Yuwei Huang Dingbang Ma Yifan Ge Huiwen Hao Tianyu Zhao Yansheng Liang Shaowei Wang Ming Lei
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 08:00 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics
keywords structured illumination microscopyoptical sectioningHilbert transformsignal-to-noise ratio3D fluorescence imagingthick tissuesnoise suppressionbiological imaging
0
0 comments X

The pith

The HT-SHiLo algorithm raises SNR in optical sectioning structured illumination microscopy and doubles usable imaging depth in thick tissues.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Structured illumination microscopy produces fast, low-toxicity 3D fluorescence images, yet traditional decoding yields low signal-to-noise ratios once tissues become thick. The paper introduces the HT-SHiLo decoder, which applies Hilbert-transform decoding followed by space-domain high-low filtering to suppress noise. Demonstrations on mouse brains, Drosophila clock neurons, organoids, and live cells show clearer optical sections and usable images at twice the previous depth. The result keeps the speed and resolution advantages of OS-SIM while making millimeter-scale samples practical targets.

Core claim

The HT-SHiLo algorithm combines Hilbert-transform decoding with space-domain high-low processing to suppress noise in OS-SIM. This produces significantly higher SNR at rapid processing speeds and extends imaging depth by a factor of two in thick tissues. The method yields high-quality 3D images of mouse brains, Drosophila clock neurons, organoids, and live cells, rendering OS-SIM suitable for 3D morphology studies of cellular organelles or thick tissues.

What carries the argument

The HT-SHiLo algorithm, a decoder for OS-SIM that uses Hilbert-transform decoding followed by space-domain high-low filtering to suppress noise.

If this is right

  • Optical sectioning images acquire substantially higher signal-to-noise ratio without loss of speed.
  • Usable imaging depth in thick tissues increases by a factor of two.
  • High-quality 3D reconstructions become feasible for millimeter-scale samples including mouse brains and organoids.
  • Cellular dynamics can be tracked in live cells with maintained low phototoxicity.
  • OS-SIM extends to broader studies of cellular organelles inside intact thick tissues.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The approach may reduce reliance on physical sectioning for volumetric tissue studies.
  • Rapid processing could support extended time-lapse recordings of thicker specimens.
  • Performance on illumination patterns or tissue types outside the tested set would require separate verification.
  • Combination with complementary contrast mechanisms might push depth limits further in scattering media.

Load-bearing premise

The noise statistics measured in the tested biological samples are representative of the general case and the Hilbert-transform step introduces no systematic artifacts that would appear under different sample conditions or illumination patterns.

What would settle it

Repeating the depth and SNR measurements on a fresh set of tissues whose scattering or noise properties differ markedly from the reported samples and finding either no depth gain or visible artifacts would falsify the claimed generality.

read the original abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) fluorescence imaging provides a vital approach for study of biological tissues with intricate structures, and optical sectioning structured illumination microscopy (OS-SIM) stands out for its high imaging speed, low phototoxicity and high spatial resolution. However, OS-SIM faces the problem of low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) when using traditional decoding algorithms, especially in thick tissues. Here we propose a Hilbert-transform decoding and space domain based high-low (HT-SHiLo) algorithm for noise suppression in OS-SIM. We demonstrate HT-SHiLo algorithm can significantly improve the SNR of optical sectioning images at rapid processing speed, and double the imaging depth in thick tissues. With our OS-SIM system, we achieve high quality 3D images of various biological samples including mouse brains, Drosophila clock neurons, organoids, and live cells. We anticipate that this approach will render OS-SIM a powerful technique for research of cellular organelles or thick tissues in 3D morphology.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes the HT-SHiLo algorithm, which applies a Hilbert transform to modulated images before high-low separation in optical sectioning structured illumination microscopy (OS-SIM). It claims this yields significantly higher SNR at rapid processing speed and doubles imaging depth in thick tissues, with demonstrations on mouse brains, Drosophila clock neurons, organoids, and live cells.

Significance. If the SNR and depth claims are substantiated by quantitative metrics and the Hilbert-transform step is shown not to introduce systematic artifacts, the method would offer a practical advance for high-speed, low-phototoxicity 3D fluorescence imaging of thick biological samples, extending OS-SIM utility to deeper tissues and cellular dynamics studies.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claims that HT-SHiLo 'significantly improve[s] the SNR' and 'double[s] the imaging depth' are unsupported by any quantitative metrics, error bars, sample sizes, or direct comparisons to traditional decoding algorithms, so the strength of the result cannot be evaluated.
  2. [Algorithm description (Hilbert-transform step)] Hilbert-transform decoding step: the algorithm applies the Hilbert transform before high-low separation under the assumption that the signal remains analytic without distortion; no validation (e.g., ablation on synthetic phantoms with known ground-truth depth profiles or tests across non-Gaussian/non-stationary noise regimes and varied pattern frequencies) is reported to bound possible ringing or low-frequency leakage artifacts in thick-tissue scattering conditions.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract would be strengthened by reporting concrete processing speeds (e.g., frames per second or wall-clock time per volume) to support the 'rapid processing speed' claim.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thoughtful and constructive comments, which highlight important areas for strengthening the manuscript. We address each major comment below and will revise the paper accordingly to improve clarity and rigor.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claims that HT-SHiLo 'significantly improve[s] the SNR' and 'double[s] the imaging depth' are unsupported by any quantitative metrics, error bars, sample sizes, or direct comparisons to traditional decoding algorithms, so the strength of the result cannot be evaluated.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract would benefit from quantitative support. The full manuscript contains direct comparisons (e.g., SNR values and depth measurements across samples) with error bars and sample sizes, but these were not summarized in the abstract. In the revised version we will update the abstract to include specific quantitative metrics, such as average SNR improvement in dB, the factor of depth increase with standard deviation, sample sizes (N), and explicit comparisons to conventional high-low decoding. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Algorithm description (Hilbert-transform step)] Hilbert-transform decoding step: the algorithm applies the Hilbert transform before high-low separation under the assumption that the signal remains analytic without distortion; no validation (e.g., ablation on synthetic phantoms with known ground-truth depth profiles or tests across non-Gaussian/non-stationary noise regimes and varied pattern frequencies) is reported to bound possible ringing or low-frequency leakage artifacts in thick-tissue scattering conditions.

    Authors: The empirical results on scattering samples (mouse brain, Drosophila neurons, organoids) provide real-world validation under thick-tissue conditions, but we acknowledge the value of controlled synthetic tests to bound potential artifacts. We will add an ablation study using synthetic phantoms with known ground-truth depth profiles, including tests under varied noise regimes and pattern frequencies, to explicitly quantify any ringing or leakage effects in the revised manuscript. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: empirical algorithm demonstration with no self-referential derivations

full rationale

The paper proposes the HT-SHiLo algorithm (Hilbert-transform decoding combined with space-domain high-low separation) and reports empirical SNR improvements and doubled imaging depth on biological samples (mouse brains, Drosophila neurons, organoids, live cells). No equations, parameter fits, or predictions are described that reduce by construction to the inputs; the central claims rest on experimental demonstrations rather than closed mathematical loops or self-citation chains. The reader's assessment of score 2.0 is consistent with absence of detectable circularity at the level of the provided text.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review supplies no information on free parameters, axioms, or invented entities.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5761 in / 968 out tokens · 18363 ms · 2026-05-23T08:00:07.957945+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Dekkers, J. F. et al. High-resolution 3D imaging of fixed and cleared organoids. Nat. Protoc. 14, 1756–1771 (2019). doi:10.1038/s41596-019-0160-8

    work page doi:10.1038/s41596-019-0160-8 2019

  2. [2]

    Yi Y. et al. Mapping of individual sensory nerve axons from digits to spinal cord with the transparent embedding solvent system. Cell Res. 34, 124–139 (2024). doi:10.1038/s41422-023-00867-3

    work page doi:10.1038/s41422-023-00867-3 2024

  3. [3]

    & Boudier, T

    Ollion, J., Cochennec, J., Loll, F., Escudé, C. & Boudier, T. TANGO: a generic tool for high-throughput 3D image analysis for studying nuclear organization. Bioinformatics, 29, 1840–1841 (2013). doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btt276

    work page doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btt276 2013

  4. [4]

    & Huang, D

    Li, L., Zhang, Q. & Huang, D. A review of imaging techniques for plant phenotyping. Sensors 14, 20078–20111 (2014). doi:10.3390/s141120078

    work page doi:10.3390/s141120078 2014

  5. [5]

    Confocal laser scanning microscopy: using cuticular autofluorescence for high resolution morphological imaging in small crustaceans

    Michels, J. Confocal laser scanning microscopy: using cuticular autofluorescence for high resolution morphological imaging in small crustaceans. J. Microsc. 227, 1–7 (2007). doi:10.1111/j.1365-2818.2007.01787.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2818.2007.01787.x 2007

  6. [6]

    M., Wright, G

    Jonkman, J., Brown, C. M., Wright, G. D., Anderson, K. I. & North, A. J. Tutorial: guidance for quantitative confocal microscopy. Nat. Protoc. 15, 1585–1611 (2020). doi:10.1038/s41596-020-0313-9

    work page doi:10.1038/s41596-020-0313-9 2020

  7. [7]

    & Brown, C

    Jonkman, J. & Brown, C. M. Any way you slice it-a comparison of confocal microscopy techniques. J. Biomol. Tech. 26, 54–65 (2015). doi: 10.7171/jbt.15-2602- 003

    work page doi:10.7171/jbt.15-2602- 2015

  8. [8]

    & Browne, M

    Oreopoulos, J., Berman, R. & Browne, M. Spinning-disk confocal microscopy: present technology and future trends. Methods Cell Biol. 123, 153–175 (2014). doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-420138-5.00009-4

    work page doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-420138-5.00009-4 2014

  9. [9]

    D., Wittbrodt, J

    Huisken, J., Swoger, J., Bene, F. D., Wittbrodt, J. & Stelzer, E. H. K. Optical sectioning deep inside live embryos by selective plane illumination microscopy. Science 305, 1007–1009 (2004). doi:10.1126/science.1100035

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1100035 2004

  10. [10]

    V ettenburg, T. et al. Light-sheet microscopy using an Airy beam. Nat. Methods 11, 541–544 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2922

    work page doi:10.1038/nmeth.2922 2014

  11. [11]

    Chen, B. C. et al. Lattice light-sheet microscopy: imaging molecules to embryos at high spatiotemporal resolution. Science 346, 1257998 (2014). doi:10.1126/science.1257998

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1257998 2014

  12. [12]

    & Horowitz, M

    Levoy, M., Ng, R., Adams, A., Footer, M. & Horowitz, M. Light field microscopy. ACM Trans. Graph. 25, 924–934 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1145/1141911.1141976

    work page doi:10.1145/1141911.1141976 2006

  13. [14]

    Wu, J. et al. Iterative tomography with digital adaptive optics permits hour-long intravital observation of 3D subcellular dynamics at millisecond scale. Cell 184, 3318–3332 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2021.04.029

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cell.2021.04.029 2021

  14. [15]

    & Wilson, T

    Karadaglić, D. & Wilson, T. Image formation in structured illumination wide- field fluorescence microscopy. Micron 39, 808–818 (2008). doi:10.1016/j.micron.2008.01.017

    work page doi:10.1016/j.micron.2008.01.017 2008

  15. [16]

    & Lei, M

    Dan, D., Y ao, B. & Lei, M. Structured illumination microscopy for super- resolution and optical sectioning. Chin. Sci. Bull. 59, 1291–1307 (2014). doi:10.1007/s11434-014-0181-1

    work page doi:10.1007/s11434-014-0181-1 2014

  16. [17]

    Zhang, Q., Pan, D. & Ji, N. High-resolution in vivo optical-sectioning widefield microendoscopy. Optica. 7, 1287–1290 (2020). doi:10.1364/OPTICA.397788

    work page doi:10.1364/optica.397788 2020

  17. [18]

    A., Juskaitis, R

    Neil, M. A., Juskaitis, R. & Wilson, T. Method of obtaining optical sectioning by using structured light in a conventional microscope. Opt. Lett. 22, 1905–1907 (1997). doi:10.1364/ol.22.001905

    work page doi:10.1364/ol.22.001905 1905

  18. [19]

    Lim, D., Chu, K. K. & Mertz, J. Wide-field fluorescence sectioning with hybrid speckle and uniform-illumination microscopy. Opt. Lett. 33, 1819 (2008). doi:10.1364/OL.33.001819

    work page doi:10.1364/ol.33.001819 2008

  19. [20]

    N., Chu, K

    Lim, D., Ford, T. N., Chu, K. K. & Mertz, J. Optically sectioned in vivo imaging with speckle illumination HiLo microscopy. J. Biomed. Opt. 16, 016014 (2011). doi:10.1117/1.3528656

    work page doi:10.1117/1.3528656 2011

  20. [21]

    Dan, D. et al. DMD-based LED-illumination super-resolution and optical sectioning microscopy. Sci. Rep. 3, 1116 (2013). doi:10.1038/srep01116

    work page doi:10.1038/srep01116 2013

  21. [22]

    Zhou, X. et al. Double-exposure optical sectioning structured illumination microscopy based on Hilbert transform reconstruction. PLoS ONE 10, e0120892 (2015). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0120892

    work page doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0120892 2015

  22. [23]

    Qian, J. et al. Full-color structured illumination optical sectioning microscopy. Sci. Rep. 5, 14513 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep14513

    work page doi:10.1038/srep14513 2015

  23. [24]

    Qian, J. et al. Large-scale 3D imaging of insects with natural color. Opt. Express 27, 4845 (2019). doi:10.1364/OE.27.004845

    work page doi:10.1364/oe.27.004845 2019

  24. [25]

    Zhao, T. et al. Reconstructing the color 3D tomography of lunar samples. At. Spectrosc. 43, 6–12 (2022). doi:10.46770/AS.2022.009

    work page doi:10.46770/as.2022.009 2022

  25. [26]

    Wang, Z. et al. Breathing colour into fossils: a tomographic system for reconstructing the soft tissue microstructure of amber inclusions. Opt. Lasers Eng. 148, 106775 (2022). doi:10.1016/j.optlaseng.2021.106775

    work page doi:10.1016/j.optlaseng.2021.106775 2022

  26. [27]

    Wang, M. et al. Three-dimensional natural color imaging based on focus level correlation algorithm using structured illumination microscopy. Front. Phys. 10, 1041577 (2022). doi:10.3389/fphy.2022.1041577

    work page doi:10.3389/fphy.2022.1041577 2022

  27. [28]

    Murray, J. M. Methods for imaging thick specimens: confocal microscopy, deconvolution, and structured illumination. Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2011, 1399– 1437 (2011). doi:10.1101/pdb.top066936

    work page doi:10.1101/pdb.top066936 2011

  28. [29]

    & Tkaczyk, T

    Hagen, N., Gao, L. & Tkaczyk, T. S. Quantitative sectioning and noise analysis for structured illumination microscopy. Opt. Express 20, 403–413 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.20.000403

    work page doi:10.1364/oe.20.000403 2012

  29. [30]

    Dang, S. et al. Background noise suppression of optical sectioning structured illumination microscopy via Fourier domain reconstruction . Front. Phys. 10, 900686 (2022). doi:10.3389/fphy.2022.900686

    work page doi:10.3389/fphy.2022.900686 2022

  30. [31]

    & Guo, Y

    Qiao, C., Chen, X., Zhang, S. & Guo, Y. 3D structured illumination microscopy via channel attention generative adversarial network. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 27, 1–11 (2021). doi:10.1109/JSTQE.2021.3060762

    work page doi:10.1109/jstqe.2021.3060762 2021

  31. [32]

    Jing, D. et al. Tissue clearing of both hard and soft tissue organs with the PEGASOS method. Cell Res. 28, 803–818 (2018). doi:10.1038/s41422-018-0049-z

    work page doi:10.1038/s41422-018-0049-z 2018

  32. [33]

    Ni, H., Williams J. A. & Ding, W. Mitochondrial dynamics and mitochondri al quality control. Redox. Biol. 4, 6–13 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redox.2014.11.006

    work page doi:10.1016/j.redox.2014.11.006 2015

  33. [34]

    & Scorrano, L

    Pernas, L. & Scorrano, L. Mito-morphosis: mitochondrial fusion, fission, and cristae remodeling as key mediators of cellular function. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 78, 505– 531 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physiol-021115-105011

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-physiol-021115-105011 2016

  34. [35]

    Jenkins, B. C. et al. Mitochondria in disease: changes in shapes and dynamics. Trends Biochem. Sci. 49, 346–360 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2024.01.011

    work page doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2024.01.011 2024

  35. [36]

    Yu, C. et al. Structural insights into G domain dimerization and pathogenic mutation of OPA1. J. Cell Biol. 219, e201907098 (2020). doi:10.1083/jcb.201907098

    work page doi:10.1083/jcb.201907098 2020

  36. [37]

    Ma, L. et al. Discovery of the migrasome, an organelle mediating release of cytoplasmic contents during cell migration. Cell Res. 25, 24-38 (2015). doi:10.1038/cr.2014.135

    work page doi:10.1038/cr.2014.135 2015

  37. [38]

    Yu, S. & Yu, L. Migrasome biogenesis and functions. FEBS J. 289, 7246-7254 (2022). doi:10.1111/febs.16183

    work page doi:10.1111/febs.16183 2022

  38. [40]

    Jiang, D., Li, Y. & Yu, L. Detection, purification, characterization, and manipulation of migrasomes. Curr. Protoc. 3, e856 (2023). doi:10.1002/cpz1.856

    work page doi:10.1002/cpz1.856 2023

  39. [42]

    Huang, Y. et al. Migrasome formation is mediated by assembly of micron-scale tetraspanin macrodomains. Nat. Cell Biol. 21, 991–1002 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41556 -019-0367-5

    work page doi:10.1038/s41556 2019

  40. [43]

    Wang, J. et al. Deep super-resolution imaging of thick tissue using structured illumination with adaptive optics. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.12.21.572818 (2023)

    work page doi:10.1101/2023.12.21.572818 2023

  41. [44]

    Zhao, W. et al. Sparse deconvolution improves the resolution of live-cell super- resolution fluorescence microscopy. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 606–617 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587 -021-01092-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41587 2022

  42. [45]

    Hou, Y. et al. Multi-resolution analysis enables fidelity-ensured deconvolution for fluorescence microscopy. eLight 4, 14 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43593 -024- 00073-7

    work page doi:10.1186/s43593 2024

  43. [46]

    & Mertz, J

    Zhao, B. & Mertz, J. Resolution enhancement with deblurring by pixel reassignment . Adv. Photon. 5, 066004 (2023). doi:10.1117/1.AP.5.6.066004

    work page doi:10.1117/1.ap.5.6.066004 2023

  44. [47]

    Qiao, C. et al. Zero-shot learning enables instant denoising and super-resolution in optical fluorescence microscopy. Nat. Commun. 15, 4180 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467 -024-48575-9

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467 2024

  45. [48]

    Zhao, T. et al. Fast single-layer reconstruction for three-dimensional structured illumination microscopy. Opt. Lasers Eng. 167, 107606 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2023.107606

    work page doi:10.1016/j.optlaseng.2023.107606 2023

  46. [49]

    Wang, Z. et al. High-speed image reconstruction for optically sectioned, super- resolution structured illumination microscopy. Adv. Photon. 4, 026003 (2022). doi:10.1117/1.AP.4.2.026003

    work page doi:10.1117/1.ap.4.2.026003 2022

  47. [50]

    Wang, Z. et al. Rapid, artifact -reduced, image reconstruction for super-resolution structured illumination microscopy. Innovation 4, 100425 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xinn.2023.100425

    work page doi:10.1016/j.xinn.2023.100425 2023