Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 64 references

Elucidating microstructural influences on fatigue behavior for additively manufactured Hastelloy X using Bayesian-calibrated crystal plasticity model

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Bayesian optimization calibrates a nine-parameter crystal-plasticity model of additively manufactured Hastelloy X and identifies large, favorably oriented grains at twin boundaries as fatigue-failure sites.

desk verdict Competent BO calibration study with a useful new objective term, but the headline microstructural failure-site claim is built on a non-unique parameter set and needs to be walked back or validated. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.10405 v1 pith:W33K3ZZ4 submitted 2024-12-06 cs.CE cond-mat.mtrl-scics.LGcs.NAmath.NA

Ajay Kushwaha , Eralp Demir , Amrita Basak This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CEcond-mat.mtrl-scics.LGcs.NAmath.NA
keywords crystalplasticityBayesianoptimizationGaussianprocesssurrogateHastelloyXlow-cyclefatiguetwinboundariesadditivemanufacturingindicatorparameter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes that a nine-parameter strain-gradient crystal-plasticity model of additively manufactured Hastelloy X can be calibrated to measured fatigue data by Bayesian optimization with a Gaussian-process surrogate, using as few as 50 initial simulations and at most 75 optimization iterations. The authors add a second term to the usual stress-error objective that penalizes the small hardening difference between consecutive loading cycles, which is what lets the fit match two stable experimental cycles at both 0.5% and 0.75% strain amplitude. The calibrated model is then used to ask which microstructural features concentrate fatigue damage, measured by accumulated plastic strain energy density. It finds that the predicted failure sites are almost always at twin boundaries in the largest grains, with high Schmid factor (favorable slip orientation) and an average neighboring-grain misorientation of about 42°±1.67°, giving a concrete microstructural fingerprint for low-cycle fatigue in this alloy.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is the coupling of a Gaussian-process surrogate model with expected-improvement Bayesian optimization, wrapped around a strain-gradient crystal-plasticity finite-element model of a representative volume element (a 200-µm cubic patch of about 300 grains). The Gaussian process learns the map from the nine constitutive parameters to an objective $\Delta\sigma$ that combines the root-mean-square error between simulated and experimental stress at 44 points on two consecutive cycles with a $\lambda$-weighted term penalizing cycle-to-cycle hardening mismatch. The strain-gradient formulation matters because it computes geometrically necessary dislocation densities from the curl of the plastic deformation gradient, and those densities feed both the effective slip resistance and the accumulated plastic strain energy density $W$ used as the fatigue indicator; this is the channel through which a macroscopically calibrated model produces grain-scale failure-site predictions.

What would settle it

Interrupt fatigue tests of the same L-PBF Hastelloy X at 500°F, locate the first cracks by post-test EBSD or in-situ imaging, and compare those sites with the grains the model flags as having the highest accumulated plastic strain energy density; if early cracks appear in small, poorly oriented, low-misorientation grains, the proposed $42^\circ$ large-grain criterion is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a single set of nine strain-gradient crystal-plasticity parameters, found by Bayesian optimization against macroscopic stress-strain loops, reproduces the 500°F cyclic response of L-PBF Hastelloy X at ±0.5% and ±0.75% strain and provides trustworthy grain-scale fatigue-damage indicators. The optimized fit reaches an average $\Delta\sigma$ of 15.06 MPa in 61 iterations once the objective includes a $\lambda$-weighted hardening-mismatch penalty, with as few as 50 initial Latin-hypercube simulations; SHAP-based sensitivity analysis shows the yield-related parameters ($\rho_{SSD}^a$, $\tau_c^0$, $C$) dominate the stress response, with backstress parameters gaining influence during compressive loading. In ten 200-µm RVEs with and without inserted twins, the homogenized stress-strain curves are nearly identical, but the location of maximum plastic strain energy density shifts from a normal grain boundary to a twin boundary when twins are present, and the overall strain-energy distribution shifts to higher values. Across all RVEs, the grain with the highest accumulated $W$ sits near the top of the grain-size distribution, has a Schmid factor typically near 0.46, and has an average misorientation of $42^\circ \pm 1.67^\circ$ with its neighbours, which the paper proposes as the probable fatigue-failure criterion.

Load-bearing premise

The grain-scale failure predictions assume that parameters fitted to the overall stress-strain loops also give the correct local deformation and dislocation patterns inside grains, since the model is never checked against measured crack-start locations; the twin fraction in the RVEs is also below the measured EBSD range.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Calibrating a new crystal-plasticity model needs no more than about 50 initial simulations and 75 optimization rounds, so inverse calibration becomes feasible on a single workstation.
  • Adding a $\lambda$-weighted penalty for cycle-to-cycle hardening mismatch makes the simulated loops reproduce the near-overlapping experimental cycles, which a plain stress-error objective fails to do.
  • Synthetic microstructures without twins can reproduce the macroscopic stress-strain curve yet mislocate the predicted fatigue-initiation site, so twin boundaries must be included for micromechanical fatigue studies.
  • The identified failure-site fingerprint—large grain diameter, high Schmid factor, and average misorientation near $42^\circ$—can serve as a screening criterion for fatigue-prone microstructures in L-PBF Hastelloy X at 500°F.
  • Because the optimization and sensitivity analysis are formulated at the level of the constitutive parameters and the stress-strain objective, the same Bayesian optimization procedure transfers to other alloys and other crystal-plasticity laws.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An implication left implicit is that the $42^\circ$ misorientation band should be checked against measured grain-boundary character distributions; the paper's EBSD shows a high twin fraction, so the 39°–45° range may partly reflect the prevalence of $\Sigma3$ boundaries rather than a damage-specific preference.
  • A testable extension would be to calibrate the model on one strain amplitude and predict the other: the paper calibrates both amplitudes together, so it does not demonstrate that the parameters generalize beyond the fitted loading conditions.
  • The twin fraction in the RVEs (0.4–0.5) is below the EBSD-measured range (0.62–0.73), so re-running the failure-site analysis at the measured twin fraction would show whether the large-grain/$42^\circ$ criterion is robust to twin density.
  • The sensitivity ranking suggests a cheaper variant of the method: fix low-influence parameters at reasonable values before optimization and use the remaining parameters in Bayesian optimization, then compare fit quality; the paper identifies which parameters matter but does not run this ablation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. This manuscript proposes a Bayesian optimization (BO) framework with a Gaussian-process surrogate to calibrate a nine-parameter strain-gradient crystal plasticity model for laser powder bed fusion Hastelloy X using cyclic stress-strain data at ±0.5% and ±0.75% strain amplitudes and 500 °F. A modified objective function that penalizes cycle-to-cycle hardening is introduced, and the authors report that calibration is achieved within 75 iterations with as few as 50 initial simulations. SHAP-based sensitivity analysis is used to rank parameter influence along the hysteresis loop, and synthetic RVEs with and without twins are compared. The authors conclude that twin boundaries alter local fields but not the macroscale response, and that grains with larger diameter, high Schmid factor, and average misorientation of about 42°±1.67° are probable fatigue failure sites.

Significance. If the claims are established, the work would be a useful contribution to efficient crystal-plasticity calibration, which is a recognized bottleneck. The use of cyclic data at multiple strain amplitudes, the explicit treatment of cycle-to-cycle hardening in the objective, and the inclusion of twins in synthetic microstructures address relevant gaps in the literature. The paper also benefits from concrete computational infrastructure: the OXFORD-UMAT is public, the RVE generation is detailed, and 10 RVEs are used. These strengths make the calibration workflow potentially reproducible and transferable. However, the central efficiency claim and the microstructural failure-site claim are each weakened by load-bearing issues: the reduced-initial-data experiment is not a fair test, and the calibrated parameters demonstrably lie on an identifiability valley, so the grain-scale predictions are not shown to be robust.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 3.4, Fig. 9] The conclusion that 'as few as 50 initial simulations' suffice is not supported by the experiment as conducted. The text states that the 50- and 25-point initial datasets are taken from the 100-point set 'by removing the best performing, i.e., simulations that have low Δσ values.' This is not a realistic 50-point initial design: it removes the most informative points, so the retained set is biased to look better than a fresh LHS-50 sample. The comparison therefore does not establish the stated efficiency claim. The experiment should be repeated with independent LHS draws of size 50 and 25, or at least with repeated random subsampling of the 100-point set, reporting the distribution of achieved Δσ.
  2. [Sec. 3.5, Eq. (5), Table 3] The calibration is overparameterized with respect to the macroscopic data, and the authors themselves observe the coupling in Figure 11(e): the objective constrains essentially the product C*sqrt(rho_SSD), while C and rho_SSD individually continue to fluctuate. This is consistent with Eq. (5), because at the small applied strains (<0.0075) the GND contribution to rho_total is secondary and the yield stress depends mainly on C*sqrt(rho_SSD). The optimized values C=0.1 and rho_SSD=83.7 in Table 3 are therefore one point on a near-equal-fit valley, not a uniquely identified parameter set. Since rho_SSD enters the forest density through Eq. (8) and hence affects the GND-influenced local fields used in Section 4.3, the microstructural failure-site statistics in Table 4 are conditional on that arbitrary point. The paper should either demonstrate that alternative parameter sets with equivalent macroscopic Δσ produce the same maximum-W grains, the same CDF rankings, and the same ~42° misorientation statistic, or it should reframe the microstructural findings as conditional on the selected point. The fact that C converges to the lower bound of the search range further suggests an active boundary rather than an identified optimum.
  3. [Sec. 4.3, Table 4] The central microstructural claim—that larger grains with high Schmid factor and average misorientation of about 42°±1.67° are probable failure sites—is not validated against experimental observations of crack initiation. The simulations use the optimized parameters from Table 3 and the maximum plastic strain energy density to identify failure sites, but no comparison is made to measured crack locations, EBSD-based damage maps, or fractography from the experimental program cited as [37]. A macroscopic stress-strain fit cannot by itself establish that grain-scale FIP fields are correct, especially given the parameter non-uniqueness noted above. At minimum, the paper should present the 42° result as a model prediction requiring validation, and ideally it should compare against available experimental failure-site data for the same or similar specimens.
  4. [Sec. 2.2.1 and Secs. 4.1–4.3] The synthetic RVEs contain a twin fraction of only 0.4–0.5, whereas the EBSD measurements show a twin fraction of 0.62–0.73. The authors acknowledge this mismatch but do not assess its effect on the twin-related conclusions. Since Sections 4.1–4.3 rely on the presence and placement of twin boundaries to make claims about strain energy density accumulation, TB-based failure sites, and the 42° misorientation statistic, the systematic under-representation of twins is a load-bearing limitation. A sensitivity study with higher twin fractions, or at least a discussion of whether the conclusions are expected to be insensitive to twin fraction, is needed before those claims can be accepted.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Sec. 2.3.1 and Sec. 2.2.2] Equation numbers are duplicated: Eq. (12) is used for both the Gaussian process prior and the effective plastic strain rate, and Eq. (13) is used for both the expected improvement acquisition function and the plastic strain energy density. Please renumber.
  2. [Sec. 3.2, Fig. 6] The text reports R² scores but does not explicitly state whether the quoted values are for the held-out 30% test set or for the training set. Please clarify, and if possible report both training and test R².
  3. [Sec. 3.4, Fig. 9] The caption says 'number of iterations to achieve optimal solution,' but the algorithm is run for a fixed budget of 75 iterations and the reported value is the best found within that budget. Rephrase to 'best value found within the iteration budget' to avoid implying that a stopping criterion detected a global optimum.
  4. [Sec. 4.3] The definition of 'average misorientation of a grain' should be made more precise: it is defined as a number-weighted average of misorientation with neighboring grains, but the weighting rule and angular cutoff used should be stated explicitly.
  5. [Sec. 2.2.2, Eq. (5)] The symbol tau_c^a appears to denote both the current slip resistance in Eq. (9) and a term in Eq. (5) described as 'strength due to statistical hardening.' The notation is confusing and should be disambiguated.
  6. [General] Reference [51] is a duplicate of [34]; please consolidate or cite the original source once.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the BO/GP calibration is a standard inverse fit, and the microstructure/fatigue conclusions are post-hoc simulation analyses rather than predictions forced by the objective.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation chain is a standard inverse problem: experimental cyclic stress-strain curves (from Pal et al. [37]) define a scalar misfit, a Gaussian-process surrogate is fit to simulation responses over a parameter domain, and Bayesian optimization minimizes that misfit. Nothing in this chain is defined in terms of the quantities it later claims to predict. The λ-dependent objective (Eq. 15) explicitly adds a penalty on the two-cycle endpoint stress difference, so the observation that increasing λ reduces Δσmax32 is a property of the chosen objective, not a prediction from calibrated parameters; the paper does not mislabel this design feature as a prediction. The SHAP sensitivity studies (Figs. 12-13) describe the surrogate's input-output mapping and are not circular. The microstructural failure-site findings in Sec. 4.3 are post-hoc summaries of the calibrated model: plastic strain energy density W is a simulation output, and the grain size, Schmid factor, and misorientation are extracted from the same grains identified by high W. Whether the macroscopic calibration uniquely determines these grain-scale fields is a genuine identifiability and validation concern—indeed Sec. 3.5 reports that C and ρ_SSD only converge in the product C√ρ_SSD (Fig. 11(e))—but non-uniqueness is not circularity. Self-citations ([37], [45], [47]) provide measured fatigue data, the CP code, and the GND formulation; these are external measurements or code-reproduced model components, and no uniqueness theorem is imported. Overall, no load-bearing claim reduces by construction to its input.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central results rest on a standard strain-gradient crystal plasticity framework, several material-modeling choices taken from the literature or from hand fitting, and a Bayesian optimization calibration whose objective includes a hand-selected penalty weight. No new physical entities are introduced. The weakest ledger entries are the hand-adjusted elastic constants, the imperfect twin-fraction match between synthetic and EBSD microstructures, and the unvalidated transfer of macro-calibrated parameters to grain-scale fatigue indicator predictions.

free parameters (4)
  • CP parameter vector (n, tau_c0, C, rho_SSD, h0, tau_s, m, h, hd) = n=21.9, tau_c0=22.2 MPa, C=0.1, rho_SSD=83.7 um^-2, h0=87.1 MPa, tau_s=437.4 MPa, m=9, h=32694.6 MPa, hd=711
    Nine constitutive parameters fitted by Bayesian optimization to cyclic stress-strain data at both strain amplitudes; the reported agreement is a training fit, not an independent validation.
  • Elastic constants C11, C22, C44 = 250 GPa, 139 GPa, 70.2 GPa
    Taken from a prior study then adjusted by hand to match experimental results (Section 2.2.2). No fitting procedure or uncertainty is reported for these adjusted constants.
  • Objective function weight lambda = 0.5 in the final calibration; 0, 0.5, and 1 were tested
    Chosen based on optimization performance across runs (Sections 3.3 to 3.5). This weight controls the inter-cycle hardening penalty in Equation 15.
  • Failed-simulation penalty = 500 MPa added to the objective
    An arbitrary penalty value assigned when simulations fail for parameters suggested by the Bayesian optimizer (Section 3.3). It shapes the optimization trajectory but is not a physical quantity.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Hutchinson-type power-law flow rule with reference shear rate and rate sensitivity exponent n
    Equation 4 is the constitutive assumption for slip system shear rate; all calibration results depend on this phenomenological flow rule.
  • domain assumption Taylor relation for effective critical resolved shear stress with forest and GND contributions
    Equations 5 to 8 define yield and hardening from dislocation densities; taken from prior crystal plasticity literature without independent verification for this material.
  • domain assumption SSD density is treated as constant because applied strain is below 0.0075
    Invoked after Equation 8. This limits the model to small-strain fatigue and may bias the fitted hardening parameters.
  • domain assumption Latent hardening ratios q = 1.0 for coplanar slip and q = 1.2 otherwise
    Fixed values taken from reference [4] and not calibrated; the macroscopic stress-strain fit depends on them.
  • domain assumption 2D EBSD grain diameters are converted to 3D equivalent sphere diameters by multiplying by 4/pi
    Used in DREAM.3D microstructure generation (Section 2.2.1). This is a geometric approximation with no direct 3D verification.
  • ad hoc to paper Twin fraction 0.4 to 0.5 in synthetic RVEs is sufficient even though EBSD shows 0.62 to 0.73
    Acknowledged software limitation in Section 2.2.1. If the actual twin fraction matters for fatigue indicator values, the twin-related conclusions could change.
  • domain assumption Ten RVEs of 200 micrometers with about 300 grains represent the texture and homogenized response
    Cited to reference [43]. No grain-count or RVE-count convergence study is reported for this material.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Elucidating microstructural influences on fatigue behavior for additively manufactured Hastelloy X using Bayesian-calibrated crystal plasticity model." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/W33K3ZZ4

@misc{pith2026241210405,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Elucidating microstructural influences on fatigue behavior for additively manufactured Hastelloy X using Bayesian-calibrated crystal plasticity model},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/W33K3ZZ4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.10405}
}
read the original abstract

Crystal plasticity (CP) modeling is a vital tool for predicting the mechanical behavior of materials, but its calibration involves numerous (>8) constitutive parameters, often requiring time-consuming trial-and-error methods. This paper proposes a robust calibration approach using Bayesian optimization (BO) to identify optimal CP model parameters under fatigue loading conditions. Utilizing cyclic data from additively manufactured Hastelloy X specimens at 500 degree-F, the BO framework, integrated with a Gaussian process surrogate model, significantly reduces the number of required simulations. A novel objective function is developed to match experimental stress-strain data across different strain amplitudes. Results demonstrate that effective CP model calibration is achieved within 75 iterations, with as few as 50 initial simulations. Sensitivity analysis reveals the influence of CP parameters at various loading points on the stress-strain curve. The results show that the stress-strain response is predominantly controlled by parameters related to yield, with increased influence from backstress parameters during compressive loading. In addition, the effect of introducing twins into the synthetic microstructure on fatigue behavior is studied, and a relationship between microstructural features and the fatigue indicator parameter is established. Results show that larger diameter grains, which exhibit a higher Schmid factor and an average misorientation of approximately 42 degrees +/- 1.67 degree, are identified as probable sites for failure. The proposed optimization framework can be applied to any material system or CP model, streamlining the calibration process and improving the predictive accuracy of such models.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.10405 by the authors.

Figure 9
Figure 9. Performance of BO algorithm: (a) number of iterations to achieve optimal solution for different number of initial simulations with (b) corresponding Δσ values for each 𝜆. 3.5 Optimization for multiple strains After evaluating the algorithm for a single strain and determining that the combination of initial number of simulations of 50 and 𝜆 = 0.5 allows for efficient convergence to a low Δσ, the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:fig… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages

  1. [37]

    Fatigue life prediction of rough Hastelloy X specimens fabricated using laser powder bed fusion,

    R. Pal, B. Kemerling, D. Ryan, S. Bollapragada, and A. Basak, “Fatigue life prediction of rough Hastelloy X specimens fabricated using laser powder bed fusion,” Addit Manuf, vol. 94, p. 104450, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.1016/J.ADDMA.2024.104450

    work page arXiv 2024

  2. [1]

    Overview of constitutive laws, kinematics, homogenization and multiscale methods in crystal plasticity finite-element modeling: Theory, experiments, applications,

    F. Roters, P. Eisenlohr, L. Hantcherli, D. D. Tjahjanto, T. R. Bieler, and D. Raabe, “Overview of constitutive laws, kinematics, homogenization and multiscale methods in crystal plasticity finite-element modeling: Theory, experiments, applications,” Acta Mater, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 1152–1211, Feb. 2010, doi: 10.1016/J.ACTAMAT.2009.10.058

    doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2009.10.058 2010

  3. [2]

    Crystallographic texture evolution in bulk deformation processing of FCC metals,

    S. R. Kalidindi, C. A. Bronkhorst, and L. Anand, “Crystallographic texture evolution in bulk deformation processing of FCC metals,” J Mech Phys Solids, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 537– 569, Jan. 1992, doi: 10.1016/0022-5096(92)80003-9

    doi:10.1016/0022-5096(92)80003-9 1992

  4. [3]

    F. Roters et al., “DAMASK – The Düsseldorf Advanced Material Simulation Kit for modeling multi-physics crystal plasticity, thermal, and damage phenomena from the single crystal up to the component scale,” Comput Mater Sci, vol. 158, pp. 420–478, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.1016/J.COMMATSCI.2018.04.030

    doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.04.030 2019

  5. [4]

    Microstructure- sensitive critical plastic strain energy density criterion for fatigue life prediction across various loading regimes,

    R. Bandyopadhyay, V. Prithivirajan, A. D. Peralta, and M. D. Sangid, “Microstructure- sensitive critical plastic strain energy density criterion for fatigue life prediction across various loading regimes,” Proceedings of the Royal Society A, vol. 476, no. 2236, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1098/RSPA.2019.0766

    work page arXiv 2020

  6. [5]

    A crystal plasticity approach to understand fatigue response with respect to pores in additive manufactured aluminium alloys,

    M. Cao, Y. Liu, and F. P. E. Dunne, “A crystal plasticity approach to understand fatigue response with respect to pores in additive manufactured aluminium alloys,” Int J Fatigue, vol. 161, p. 106917, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.1016/J.IJFATIGUE.2022.106917

    work page arXiv 2022

  7. [6]

    The role of defects and critical pore size analysis in the fatigue response of additively manufactured IN718 via crystal plasticity,

    V. Prithivirajan and M. D. Sangid, “The role of defects and critical pore size analysis in the fatigue response of additively manufactured IN718 via crystal plasticity,” Mater Des, vol. 150, pp. 139–153, Jul. 2018, doi: 10.1016/J.MATDES.2018.04.022

    work page doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2018.04.022 2018

  8. [7]

    A physics-based crystal plasticity model for the prediction of the dislocation densities in micropillar compression,

    J. Jeong and G. Z. Voyiadjis, “A physics-based crystal plasticity model for the prediction of the dislocation densities in micropillar compression,” J Mech Phys Solids, vol. 167, p. 105006, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1016/J.JMPS.2022.105006

    arXiv 2022

Show all 64 references
  1. [8]

    Asymptotic fields in steady crack growth with linear strain- hardening,

    P. Ponte Castañeda, “Asymptotic fields in steady crack growth with linear strain- hardening,” J Mech Phys Solids, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 227–268, Jan. 1987, doi: 10.1016/0022-5096(87)90037-8

    1987 doi

  2. [9]

    An analysis of nonuniform and localized deformation in ductile single crystals,

    D. Peirce, R. J. Asaro, and A. Needleman, “An analysis of nonuniform and localized deformation in ductile single crystals,” Acta Metallurgica, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 1087–1119, Jun. 1982, doi: 10.1016/0001-6160(82)90005-0

    1982 doi

  3. [10]

    Kinetics of flow and strain-hardening,

    H. Mecking and U. F. Kocks, “Kinetics of flow and strain-hardening,” Acta Metallurgica, vol. 29, no. 11, pp. 1865–1875, Nov. 1981, doi: 10.1016/0001-6160(81)90112-7

    1981 doi

  4. [11]

    Materials at High Temperatures A mathematical representation of the multiaxial Bauschinger effect,

    C. O. Frederick and P. J. Armstrong, “Materials at High Temperatures A mathematical representation of the multiaxial Bauschinger effect,” 2014, doi: 10.1179/096034007X207589

    2014 doi

  5. [12]

    Kinematic hardening rules with critical state of dynamic recovery, part I: formulation and basic features for ratchetting behavior,

    N. Ohno and J. D. Wang, “Kinematic hardening rules with critical state of dynamic recovery, part I: formulation and basic features for ratchetting behavior,” Int J Plast, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 375–390, Jan. 1993, doi: 10.1016/0749-6419(93)90042-O

    1993 doi

  6. [13]

    Application of a nanoindentation-based approach for parameter identification to a crystal plasticity model for bcc metals,

    F. J. Gallardo-Basile et al., “Application of a nanoindentation-based approach for parameter identification to a crystal plasticity model for bcc metals,” Materials Science and Engineering: A, vol. 881, p. 145373, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1016/J.MSEA.2023.145373

    2023

  7. [14]

    Identification of crystal plasticity parameters using DIC measurements and weighted FEMU,

    A. Guery, F. Hild, F. Latourte, and S. Roux, “Identification of crystal plasticity parameters using DIC measurements and weighted FEMU,” Mechanics of Materials, vol. 100, pp. 55–71, Sep. 2016, doi: 10.1016/J.MECHMAT.2016.06.007

    2016 doi

  8. [15]

    Comparative assessment of backstress models using high-energy X-ray diffraction microscopy experiments and crystal plasticity finite element simulations,

    R. Bandyopadhyay, S. E. Gustafson, K. Kapoor, D. Naragani, D. C. Pagan, and M. D. Sangid, “Comparative assessment of backstress models using high-energy X-ray diffraction microscopy experiments and crystal plasticity finite element simulations,” Int J Plast, vol. 136, p. 10288...

    2021

  9. [16]

    Low-cycle fatigue life prediction of a polycrystalline nickel-base superalloy using crystal plasticity modelling approach,

    G. J. Yuan, X. C. Zhang, B. Chen, S. T. Tu, and C. C. Zhang, “Low-cycle fatigue life prediction of a polycrystalline nickel-base superalloy using crystal plasticity modelling approach,” J Mater Sci Technol, vol. 38, pp. 28–38, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.1016/J.JMST.2019.05.072

    2020 doi

  10. [17]

    Crystal plasticity finite element modeling of grain size and morphology effects on yield strength and extreme value fatigue response,

    A. Lakshmanan, M. Yaghoobi, K. S. Stopka, and V. Sundararaghavan, “Crystal plasticity finite element modeling of grain size and morphology effects on yield strength and extreme value fatigue response,” Journal of Materials Research and Technology, vol. 19, pp. 3337–3354, Jul. ...

    2022 doi

  11. [18]

    Life prediction and damage analysis of creep-fatigue combined with high- low cycle loading by using a crystal plasticity-based approach,

    K. S. Li et al., “Life prediction and damage analysis of creep-fatigue combined with high- low cycle loading by using a crystal plasticity-based approach,” Int J Fatigue, vol. 164, p. 107154, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1016/J.IJFATIGUE.2022.107154

    2022

  12. [19]

    An inverse optimization strategy to determine single crystal mechanical behavior from polycrystal tests: Application to AZ31 Mg alloy,

    V. Herrera-Solaz, J. Llorca, E. Dogan, I. Karaman, and J. Segurado, “An inverse optimization strategy to determine single crystal mechanical behavior from polycrystal tests: Application to AZ31 Mg alloy,” Int J Plast, vol. 57, pp. 1–15, Jun. 2014, doi: 10.1016/J.IJPLAS.2014.02.001

    2014 doi

  13. [20]

    Evaluation of an inverse methodology for estimating constitutive parameters in face-centered cubic materials from single crystal indentations,

    A. Chakraborty and P. Eisenlohr, “Evaluation of an inverse methodology for estimating constitutive parameters in face-centered cubic materials from single crystal indentations,” European Journal of Mechanics - A/Solids, vol. 66, pp. 114–124, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.1016/J.EUROMECHS...

    2017 doi

  14. [21]

    Calibration and surrogate model-based sensitivity analysis of crystal plasticity finite element models,

    H. Dorward, D. M. Knowles, E. Demir, M. Mostafavi, and M. J. Peel, “Calibration and surrogate model-based sensitivity analysis of crystal plasticity finite element models,” 2023

    2023

  15. [22]

    Uncertainty Quantification in the Mechanical Response of Crystal Plasticity Simulations,

    R. Bandyopadhyay, V. Prithivirajan, and M. D. Sangid, “Uncertainty Quantification in the Mechanical Response of Crystal Plasticity Simulations,” JOM, vol. 71, no. 8, pp. 2612– 2624, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.1007/S11837-019-03551-3/FIGURES/7

    2019 doi

  16. [23]

    An efficient and robust approach to determine material parameters of crystal plasticity constitutive laws from macro-scale stress–strain curves,

    K. Sedighiani, M. Diehl, K. Traka, F. Roters, J. Sietsma, and D. Raabe, “An efficient and robust approach to determine material parameters of crystal plasticity constitutive laws from macro-scale stress–strain curves,” Int J Plast, vol. 134, p. 102779, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1016/...

    2020

  17. [24]

    On the determination of single-crystal plasticity parameters by diffraction: optimization of a polycrystalline plasticity model using a genetic algorithm,

    T. Skippon, C. Mareau, and M. R. Daymond, “On the determination of single-crystal plasticity parameters by diffraction: optimization of a polycrystalline plasticity model using a genetic algorithm,” urn:issn:0021-8898, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 627–643, Jul. 2012, doi: 10.1107/S0021...

    2012 doi

  18. [25]

    Identification of crystal plasticity model parameters by multi-objective optimization integrating microstructural evolution and mechanical data,

    D. J. Savage, Z. Feng, and M. Knezevic, “Identification of crystal plasticity model parameters by multi-objective optimization integrating microstructural evolution and mechanical data,” Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng, vol. 379, p. 113747, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.1016/J.CMA.2021.113747

    2021

  19. [26]

    Multi-Fidelity Surrogate-Based Process Mapping with Uncertainty Quantification in Laser Directed Energy Deposition,

    N. Menon, S. Mondal, and A. Basak, “Multi-Fidelity Surrogate-Based Process Mapping with Uncertainty Quantification in Laser Directed Energy Deposition,” Materials 2022, Vol. 15, Page 2902, vol. 15, no. 8, p. 2902, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.3390/MA15082902

    2022 doi

  20. [27]

    An Automated Gaussian Process Integrated With Bayesian Optimization Approach to Designing Spline-Based Pin- Fin Arrays,

    S. Dharmadhikari, R. A. Berdanier, K. A. Thole, and A. Basak, “An Automated Gaussian Process Integrated With Bayesian Optimization Approach to Designing Spline-Based Pin- Fin Arrays,” Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo, vol. 13D, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.1115/GT2023-102018

    2023 doi

  21. [28]

    An asynchronous parallel high-throughput model calibration framework for crystal plasticity finite element constitutive models,

    A. Tran and H. Lim, “An asynchronous parallel high-throughput model calibration framework for crystal plasticity finite element constitutive models,” Comput Mech, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 485–498, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.1007/S00466-023-02308-9/FIGURES/5

    2023 doi

  22. [29]

    A Method for Crystal Plasticity Model Parameter Calibration Based on Bayesian Optimization,

    X. Sun and H. Wang, “A Method for Crystal Plasticity Model Parameter Calibration Based on Bayesian Optimization,” Minerals, Metals and Materials Series, pp. 105–111, 2022, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-92533-8_18/FIGURES/5

    2022 doi

  23. [30]

    Identifying material parameters in crystal plasticity by Bayesian optimization,

    J. Kuhn, J. Spitz, P. Sonnweber-Ribic, M. Schneider, and T. Böhlke, “Identifying material parameters in crystal plasticity by Bayesian optimization,” Optimization and Engineering, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 1489–1523, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1007/S11081-021-09663- 7/FIGURES/17

    2022 doi

  24. [31]

    The physics of fatigue crack initiation,

    M. D. Sangid, “The physics of fatigue crack initiation,” Int J Fatigue, vol. 57, pp. 58–72, Dec. 2013, doi: 10.1016/J.IJFATIGUE.2012.10.009

    2013 doi

  25. [32]

    High-temperature high cycle fatigue performance of laser powder bed fusion fabricated Hastelloy X: Study into the microstructure and oxidation effects,

    M. Liu et al., “High-temperature high cycle fatigue performance of laser powder bed fusion fabricated Hastelloy X: Study into the microstructure and oxidation effects,” Mater Des, vol. 243, p. 113037, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.1016/J.MATDES.2024.113037

    2024

  26. [33]

    Fatigue crack initiation in Hastelloy X – the role of boundaries,

    W. Abuzaid, A. Oral, H. Sehitoglu, J. Lambros, and H. J. Maier, “Fatigue crack initiation in Hastelloy X – the role of boundaries,” Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct, vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 809–826, Aug. 2013, doi: 10.1111/FFE.12048

    2013 doi

  27. [35]

    Microstructure sensitive fatigue life prediction model for SLM fabricated Hastelloy-X,

    C. M. Pilgar, A. M. Fernandez, and J. Segurado, “Microstructure sensitive fatigue life prediction model for SLM fabricated Hastelloy-X,” Int J Fatigue, vol. 168, p. 107372, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1016/J.IJFATIGUE.2022.107372

    2023

  28. [36]

    LCF life prediction of turbine disc alloy using crystal plasticity and 3D representative volume element containing twin boundaries,

    Y. Zhao et al., “LCF life prediction of turbine disc alloy using crystal plasticity and 3D representative volume element containing twin boundaries,” Int J Fatigue, vol. 179, p. 108075, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.1016/J.IJFATIGUE.2023.108075

    2024

  29. [38]

    ASTM E606

    “ASTM E606.” Accessed: Oct. 13, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://compass.astm.org/document/?contentCode=ASTM%7CE0606_E0606M- 21%7Cen-US&proxycl=https%3A%2F%2Fsecure.astm.org&fromLogin=true

    2024

  30. [39]

    ASTM E3-11

    “ASTM E3-11.” Accessed: Feb. 26, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://compass.astm.org/document/?contentCode=ASTM%7CE0003-11R17%7Cen- US&proxycl=https%3A%2F%2Fsecure.astm.org&fromLogin=true

    2024

  31. [40]

    The structure of high-angle grain boundaries,

    D. G. Brandon, “The structure of high-angle grain boundaries,” Acta Metallurgica, vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 1479–1484, Nov. 1966, doi: 10.1016/0001-6160(66)90168-4

    1966 doi

  32. [41]

    DREAM.3D: A Digital Representation Environment for the Analysis of Microstructure in 3D,

    M. A. Groeber and M. A. Jackson, “DREAM.3D: A Digital Representation Environment for the Analysis of Microstructure in 3D,” Integr Mater Manuf Innov, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 56–72, Dec. 2014, doi: 10.1186/2193-9772-3-5/FIGURES/6

    2014 doi

  33. [42]

    Microstructure based fatigue life prediction framework for polycrystalline nickel-base superalloys with emphasis on the role played by twin boundaries in crack initiation,

    S. R. Yeratapally, M. G. Glavicic, M. Hardy, and M. D. Sangid, “Microstructure based fatigue life prediction framework for polycrystalline nickel-base superalloys with emphasis on the role played by twin boundaries in crack initiation,” Acta Mater, vol. 107, pp. 152–167, Apr. ...

    2016 doi

  34. [43]

    Modeling cyclic deformation of inconel 718 superalloy by means of crystal plasticity and computational homogenization,

    A. Cruzado, J. LLorca, and J. Segurado, “Modeling cyclic deformation of inconel 718 superalloy by means of crystal plasticity and computational homogenization,” Int J Solids Struct, vol. 122–123, pp. 148–161, Sep. 2017, doi: 10.1016/J.IJSOLSTR.2017.06.014

    2017 doi

  35. [44]

    GitHub - TarletonGroup/CrystalPlasticity: CP UMAT and CZM UEL for Abaqus

    “GitHub - TarletonGroup/CrystalPlasticity: CP UMAT and CZM UEL for Abaqus.” Accessed: Oct. 13, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/TarletonGroup/CrystalPlasticity

    2024

  36. [45]

    OXFORD-UMAT: An efficient and versatile crystal plasticity framework,

    E. Demir, A. Martinez-Pechero, C. Hardie, and E. Tarleton, “OXFORD-UMAT: An efficient and versatile crystal plasticity framework,” Int J Solids Struct, vol. 307, p. 113110, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.1016/J.IJSOLSTR.2024.113110

    2025

  37. [46]

    Bounds and self-consistent estimates for creep of polycrystalline materials,

    “Bounds and self-consistent estimates for creep of polycrystalline materials,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences, vol. 348, no. 1652, pp. 101–127, Feb. 1976, doi: 10.1098/RSPA.1976.0027

    1976

  38. [48]

    Dislocation-type evolution in quasi-statically compressed polycrystalline nickel,

    C. Zhu, T. Harrington, G. T. Gray, and K. S. Vecchio, “Dislocation-type evolution in quasi-statically compressed polycrystalline nickel,” Acta Mater, vol. 155, pp. 104–116, Aug. 2018, doi: 10.1016/J.ACTAMAT.2018.05.022

    2018 doi

  39. [49]

    High- and low-cycle fatigue crack initiation using polycrystal plasticity,

    A. Manonukul and F. P. E. Dunne, “High- and low-cycle fatigue crack initiation using polycrystal plasticity,” Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, vol. 460, no. 2047, pp. 1881–1903, Jul. 2004, doi: 10.1098/RSPA.2003.1258

    1903

  40. [50]

    Comparative assessment of dissipated energy and other fatigue criteria,

    A. M. Korsunsky, D. Dini, F. P. E. Dunne, and M. J. Walsh, “Comparative assessment of dissipated energy and other fatigue criteria,” Int J Fatigue, vol. 29, no. 9–11, pp. 1990– 1995, Sep. 2007, doi: 10.1016/J.IJFATIGUE.2007.01.007

    1990 doi

  41. [51]

    Deformation mechanisms of additively manufactured Hastelloy-X: A neutron diffraction experiment and crystal plasticity finite element modeling,

    A. Aburakhia, A. Bonakdar, M. Molavi-Zarandi, J. Kelleher, and H. Abdolvand, “Deformation mechanisms of additively manufactured Hastelloy-X: A neutron diffraction experiment and crystal plasticity finite element modeling,” Mater Des, vol. 222, p. 111030, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.101...

    2022

  42. [52]

    Global Optimization and the Bayesian Approach,

    J. Mockus, “Global Optimization and the Bayesian Approach,” pp. 1–3, 1989, doi: 10.1007/978-94-009-0909-0_1

    1989 doi

  43. [53]

    Gaussian Processes in Machine Learning,

    C. E. Rasmussen, “Gaussian Processes in Machine Learning,” Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), vol. 3176, pp. 63–71, 2004, doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-28650-9_4

    2004 doi

  44. [54]

    GitHub - SheffieldML/GPyOpt: Gaussian Process Optimization using GPy

    “GitHub - SheffieldML/GPyOpt: Gaussian Process Optimization using GPy.” Accessed: Oct. 13, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/SheffieldML/GPyOpt

    2024

  45. [55]

    A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output from a Computer Code,

    M. D. McKay, R. J. Beckman, and W. J. Conover, “A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output from a Computer Code,” Technometrics, vol. 21, no. 2, p. 239, May 1979, doi: 10.2307/1268522

    1979 doi

  46. [56]

    A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions

    S. M. Lundberg, P. G. Allen, and S.-I. Lee, “A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions”, Accessed: Oct. 13, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/slundberg/shap

    2024

  47. [57]

    Influence of Crystal Plasticity Parameters on the Strain Hardening Behavior of Polycrystals,

    M. Shahmardani, N. Vajragupta, and A. Hartmaier, “Influence of Crystal Plasticity Parameters on the Strain Hardening Behavior of Polycrystals,” Crystals 2021, Vol. 11, Page 1473, vol. 11, no. 12, p. 1473, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.3390/CRYST11121473

    2021 doi

  48. [58]

    Direct comparison of microstructure-sensitive fatigue crack initiation via crystal plasticity simulations and in situ high-energy X-ray experiments,

    V. Prithivirajan, P. Ravi, D. Naragani, and M. D. Sangid, “Direct comparison of microstructure-sensitive fatigue crack initiation via crystal plasticity simulations and in situ high-energy X-ray experiments,” Mater Des, vol. 197, p. 109216, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1016/J.MATDES.2020.109216

    2021

  49. [59]

    Slip transfer and plastic strain accumulation across grain boundaries in Hastelloy X,

    W. Z. Abuzaid, M. D. Sangid, J. D. Carroll, H. Sehitoglu, and J. Lambros, “Slip transfer and plastic strain accumulation across grain boundaries in Hastelloy X,” J Mech Phys Solids, vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 1201–1220, Jun. 2012, doi: 10.1016/J.JMPS.2012.02.001

    2012 doi

  50. [60]

    Crystallography and elastic anisotropy in fatigue crack nucleation at nickel alloy twin boundaries,

    X. Zhang, J. C. Stinville, T. M. Pollock, and F. P. E. Dunne, “Crystallography and elastic anisotropy in fatigue crack nucleation at nickel alloy twin boundaries,” J Mech Phys Solids, vol. 155, p. 104538, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.1016/J.JMPS.2021.104538

    2021

  51. [61]

    Crystallographic fatigue crack initiation in nickel-based superalloy René 88DT at elevated temperature,

    J. Miao, T. M. Pollock, and J. Wayne Jones, “Crystallographic fatigue crack initiation in nickel-based superalloy René 88DT at elevated temperature,” Acta Mater, vol. 57, no. 20, pp. 5964–5974, Dec. 2009, doi: 10.1016/J.ACTAMAT.2009.08.022

    2009 doi

  52. [62]

    The role of grain boundaries on fatigue crack initiation – An energy approach,

    M. D. Sangid, H. J. Maier, and H. Sehitoglu, “The role of grain boundaries on fatigue crack initiation – An energy approach,” Int J Plast, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 801–821, May 2011, doi: 10.1016/J.IJPLAS.2010.09.009

    2011 doi

  53. [63]

    The influence of grain and twin boundaries in fatigue cracking,

    A. l. Thompson, “The influence of grain and twin boundaries in fatigue cracking,” Acta Metallurgica, vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 1085–1094, Sep. 1972, doi: 10.1016/0001- 6160(72)90172-1

    1972 doi

  54. [64]

    Temperature Distribution Prediction in Laser Powder Bed Fusion using Transferable and Scalable Graph Neural Networks,

    R. Raut, A. K. Ball, and A. Basak, “Temperature Distribution Prediction in Laser Powder Bed Fusion using Transferable and Scalable Graph Neural Networks,” Jul. 2024, Accessed: Oct. 13, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.13838v1

    2024 arXiv

  55. [65]

    Graph neural network modeling of grain-scale anisotropic elastic behavior using simulated and measured microscale data,

    D. C. Pagan, C. R. Pash, A. R. Benson, and M. P. Kasemer, “Graph neural network modeling of grain-scale anisotropic elastic behavior using simulated and measured microscale data,” npj Computational Materials 2022 8:1, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–12, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1038/s41524-022-00952-y

    2022 doi

  56. [66]

    A temporal graph neural network for cross-scale modelling of polycrystals considering microstructure interaction,

    Y. Hu, G. Zhou, M. G. Lee, P. Wu, and D. Li, “A temporal graph neural network for cross-scale modelling of polycrystals considering microstructure interaction,” Int J Plast, vol. 179, p. 104017, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.1016/J.IJPLAS.2024.104017

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.