Emergent Response Planning in LLMs
Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:NSHVO5ZGrecord.jsonopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
In this work, we argue that large language models (LLMs), though trained to predict only the next token, exhibit emergent planning behaviors: $\textbf{their hidden representations encode future outputs beyond the next token}$. Through simple probing, we demonstrate that LLM prompt representations encode global attributes of their entire responses, including $\textit{structure attributes}$ (e.g., response length, reasoning steps), $\textit{content attributes}$ (e.g., character choices in storywriting, multiple-choice answers at the end of response), and $\textit{behavior attributes}$ (e.g., answer confidence, factual consistency). In addition to identifying response planning, we explore how it scales with model size across tasks and how it evolves during generation. The findings that LLMs plan ahead for the future in their hidden representations suggest potential applications for improving transparency and generation control.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Do Large Language Models Plan Answer Positions? Position Bias in Multiple-Choice Question Generation
LLMs implicitly plan answer positions during MCQ generation, as shown by predictive signals in hidden representations and controllable shifts via activation steering.
-
Towards Reasoning Era: A Survey of Long Chain-of-Thought for Reasoning Large Language Models
The paper unifies perspectives on Long CoT in reasoning LLMs by introducing a taxonomy, detailing characteristics of deep reasoning and reflection, and discussing emergence phenomena and future directions.
-
From Tokens to States: LLMs as a Special Case of World Models and the Continuous Path Beyond
LLMs are reframed as a degenerate case of world models with a continuous spectrum of architectures from next-token prediction to joint-embedding predictive architectures.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.