pith. sign in

arxiv: 2502.06717 · v1 · pith:EIFLRHCAnew · submitted 2025-02-10 · 🪐 quant-ph

A Review and Collection of Metrics and Benchmarks for Quantum Computers: definitions, methodologies and software

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords metricsquantumcomputersagreementareasbenchmarkbenchmarkshardware
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Quantum computers have the potential to provide an advantage over classical computers in a number of areas. Numerous metrics to benchmark the performance of quantum computers, ranging from their individual hardware components to entire applications, have been proposed over the years. Navigating the resulting extensive literature can be overwhelming. Objective comparisons are further hampered in practice as different variations of the same metric are used, and the data disclosed together with a reported metric value is often not sufficient to reproduce the measurements. This article addresses these challenges by providing a review of metrics and benchmarks for quantum computers and 1) a comprehensive collection of benchmarks allowing holistic comparisons of quantum computers, 2) a consistent format of the definitions across all metrics including a transparent description of the methodology and of the main assumptions and limitations, and 3) a reproducible approach by linking the metrics to open-source software used to evaluate them. We identify five areas where international standardization working groups could be established, namely: i) the identification and agreement on the categories of metrics that comprehensively benchmark device performance; ii) the identification and agreement on a set of well-established metrics that together comprehensively benchmark performance; iii) the identification of metrics specific to hardware platforms, including non-gate-based quantum computers; iv) inter-laboratory comparison studies to develop best practice guides for measurement methodology; and v) agreement on what data and software should be reported together with a metric value to ensure trust, transparency and reproducibility. We provide potential routes to advancing these areas. We expect this compendium to accelerate the progress of quantum computing hardware towards quantum advantage.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Quantum Accreditation with Non-Clifford Two-qubit Gates

    quant-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Develops practical scalable protocols to upper-bound total variation distance for quantum circuits with non-Clifford two-qubit gates and generalizes Pauli twirling to non-Pauli bases.

  2. QCalEval: Benchmarking Vision-Language Models for Quantum Calibration Plot Understanding

    quant-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Introduces QCalEval benchmark showing best zero-shot VLM score of 72.3 on quantum calibration plots, with fine-tuning and in-context learning effects varying by model type.

  3. Practical Insights into Fair Comparison and Evaluation Frame for Neutral-Atom Compilers

    cs.ET 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A new RSQASM-based framework for neutral-atom compiler evaluation demonstrates that prior performance differences between HybridMapper, DasAtom, and Enola largely disappear under consistent transpilation, movement, an...

  4. Large-Scale Quantum Circuit Simulation on an Exascale System for QPU Benchmarking

    quant-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Exascale classical simulation validates noise-tolerant performance of a 98-qubit QPU up to 48 qubits for LR-QAOA, with statistical analysis showing coherent regime up to 93 qubits before outputs become indistinguishab...