A Review and Collection of Metrics and Benchmarks for Quantum Computers: definitions, methodologies and software
read the original abstract
Quantum computers have the potential to provide an advantage over classical computers in a number of areas. Numerous metrics to benchmark the performance of quantum computers, ranging from their individual hardware components to entire applications, have been proposed over the years. Navigating the resulting extensive literature can be overwhelming. Objective comparisons are further hampered in practice as different variations of the same metric are used, and the data disclosed together with a reported metric value is often not sufficient to reproduce the measurements. This article addresses these challenges by providing a review of metrics and benchmarks for quantum computers and 1) a comprehensive collection of benchmarks allowing holistic comparisons of quantum computers, 2) a consistent format of the definitions across all metrics including a transparent description of the methodology and of the main assumptions and limitations, and 3) a reproducible approach by linking the metrics to open-source software used to evaluate them. We identify five areas where international standardization working groups could be established, namely: i) the identification and agreement on the categories of metrics that comprehensively benchmark device performance; ii) the identification and agreement on a set of well-established metrics that together comprehensively benchmark performance; iii) the identification of metrics specific to hardware platforms, including non-gate-based quantum computers; iv) inter-laboratory comparison studies to develop best practice guides for measurement methodology; and v) agreement on what data and software should be reported together with a metric value to ensure trust, transparency and reproducibility. We provide potential routes to advancing these areas. We expect this compendium to accelerate the progress of quantum computing hardware towards quantum advantage.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Quantum Accreditation with Non-Clifford Two-qubit Gates
Develops practical scalable protocols to upper-bound total variation distance for quantum circuits with non-Clifford two-qubit gates and generalizes Pauli twirling to non-Pauli bases.
-
QCalEval: Benchmarking Vision-Language Models for Quantum Calibration Plot Understanding
Introduces QCalEval benchmark showing best zero-shot VLM score of 72.3 on quantum calibration plots, with fine-tuning and in-context learning effects varying by model type.
-
Practical Insights into Fair Comparison and Evaluation Frame for Neutral-Atom Compilers
A new RSQASM-based framework for neutral-atom compiler evaluation demonstrates that prior performance differences between HybridMapper, DasAtom, and Enola largely disappear under consistent transpilation, movement, an...
-
Large-Scale Quantum Circuit Simulation on an Exascale System for QPU Benchmarking
Exascale classical simulation validates noise-tolerant performance of a 98-qubit QPU up to 48 qubits for LR-QAOA, with statistical analysis showing coherent regime up to 93 qubits before outputs become indistinguishab...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.