REVIEW 1 cited by
JAM: Controllable and Responsible Text Generation via Causal Reasoning and Latent Vector Manipulation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
While large language models (LLMs) have made significant strides in generating coherent and contextually relevant text, they often function as opaque black boxes, trained on vast unlabeled datasets with statistical objectives, lacking an interpretable framework for responsible control. In this paper, we introduce JAM (Just A Move), a novel framework that interprets and controls text generation by integrating cause-effect analysis within the latent space of LLMs. Based on our observations, we uncover the inherent causality in LLM generation, which is critical for producing responsible and realistic outputs. Moreover, we explore latent vectors as fundamental components in LLM architectures, aiming to understand and manipulate them for more effective and efficient controllable text generation. We evaluate our framework using a range of tools, including the HHH criteria, toxicity reduction benchmarks, and GPT-4 alignment measures. Our results show that JAM achieves up to a 22% improvement over previous Controllable Text Generation (CTG) methods across multiple quantitative metrics and human-centric evaluations. Furthermore, JAM demonstrates greater computational efficiency compared to other CTG methods. These results highlight the effectiveness and efficiency of JAM for responsible and realistic text generation, paving the way for more interpretable and controllable models.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
A Survey on Evaluating Quality and Trustworthiness in LLM-Generated Data
A metric-oriented survey that classifies intrinsic quality and trustworthiness metrics for LLM-generated data across six modalities and documents systematic evaluation gaps in the current literature.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.