Defense against Prompt Injection Attacks via Mixture of Encodings
Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:3NHKS4JZrecord.jsonopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as a dominant approach for a wide range of NLP tasks, with their access to external information further enhancing their capabilities. However, this introduces new vulnerabilities, known as prompt injection attacks, where external content embeds malicious instructions that manipulate the LLM's output. Recently, the Base64 defense has been recognized as one of the most effective methods for reducing success rate of prompt injection attacks. Despite its efficacy, this method can degrade LLM performance on certain NLP tasks. To address this challenge, we propose a novel defense mechanism: mixture of encodings, which utilizes multiple character encodings, including Base64. Extensive experimental results show that our method achieves one of the lowest attack success rates under prompt injection attacks, while maintaining high performance across all NLP tasks, outperforming existing character encoding-based defense methods. This underscores the effectiveness of our mixture of encodings strategy for both safety and task performance metrics.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
SkillScope: Toward Fine-Grained Least-Privilege Enforcement for Agent Skills
SkillScope detects over-privileged LLM agent skills with 94.53% F1 score via graph analysis and replay validation, finding 7,039 problematic skills in the wild and reducing violations by 88.56% while preserving task c...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.