Exploring GRBs and supernovae connection: does a superluminous hypernova population exist?

Achille Fiore; Giulia Stratta; Ludovica Crosato Menegazzi

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Exploring GRBs and supernovae connection: does a superluminous hypernova population exist?

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read No distinct superluminous-hypernova population is observationally established, and the lone GRB 111209A/SN 2011kl case is not enough to establish one.

desk verdict Useful, honest review that correctly says the 'superluminous hypernova' extension rests on a single anchor event; treat the 'tends to disfavor' conclusion as a caution, not a demonstrated inference. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.12224 v2 pith:APCAOOXQ submitted 2025-04-16 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.SR

Achille Fiore , Ludovica Crosato Menegazzi , Giulia Stratta This is my paper · ORCID

classification astro-ph.HEastro-ph.SR

keywords gamma-rayburstssuperluminoussupernovaehypernovaeultra-longmagnetarcentralengineGRB-SNconnectionSN2011klGRB111209A

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review asks whether gamma-ray bursts can be tied to a new class of superluminous supernovae ('superluminous hypernovae'), extending the well-established GRB-SN connection for broad-lined Type Ic supernovae. After surveying the roughly 45 known GRB-SN associations, the authors conclude that the only claimed case, GRB 111209A/SN 2011kl, rests on limited data and on theoretical models that require fine-tuned engine parameters. The classification of SN 2011kl as a hydrogen-poor superluminous supernova depends on one low-signal-to-noise spectrum and on a photometric bump recovered after subtracting a power-law afterglow. Every proposed single-engine model, chiefly the millisecond magnetar, needs a narrow range of spin periods, magnetic field strengths, and dipole misalignment angles to power both the ultra-long burst and the bright supernova. If the review is right, the GRB-SN connection stays confined to broad-lined Type Ic supernovae, with superluminous events as rare exceptions rather than a new class.

What carries the argument

The central object is the millisecond magnetar as a unified central engine, with spin-down luminosity $L_{\rm sd}(t)=L_0/(1+t/t_{\rm sd})^2$ and peak SN luminosity set by $L_{\rm peak}\propto E_{\rm rot}t_{\rm sd}/t_m^2$. The load-bearing identity is the partition of magnetar spin-down power into a collimated relativistic jet (fraction $f_j$) and an isotropic thermal component (fraction $f_{\rm th}$), controlled by the misalignment angle between the rotation and magnetic axes; jet breakout through the SN ejecta requires $f_j E_{\rm e}\gtrsim 0.195 E_{\rm SN}$. The review uses this machinery to show that the same engine can power both an ultra-long GRB and an SLSN only in a narrow region of the magnetic-field/spin-period plane, making the single observed association look like a fine-tuned event rather than a class.

What would settle it

Take a high-signal-to-noise optical spectrum of a supernova associated with an ultra-long GRB within days of the burst, before maximum light, and look for the O II P-Cygni absorption and blue continuum characteristic of hydrogen-poor superluminous supernovae; one unambiguous detection would contradict the review's conclusion that no superluminous-hypernova population is established.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The review's central claim is that no distinct 'superluminous hypernova-GRB' population is observationally established. The only candidate, GRB 111209A/SN 2011kl, is an ultra-long GRB with roughly seven hours of prompt emission associated with a supernova classified as hydrogen-poor superluminous; however, that classification depends on one spectrum taken about two days before maximum in which O II absorption is not unambiguously detected, and on a light-curve bump recovered after subtracting a power-law afterglow. Theoretically, a single millisecond magnetar can supply both the GRB and the superluminous supernova only for a narrow parameter range; the magnetar spin-down timescale inferred for SN 2011kl is about 13 days, two orders of magnitude longer than the GRB duration, so unified models require fine-tuned magnetic-field and geometry evolution. The authors therefore conclude that the paucity of observed SLSNe I-GRB associations and the theoretical difficulties disfavor a superluminous-hypernova connection analogous to the well-established connection with SNe Ic BL.

Load-bearing premise

The entire argument against a superluminous-hypernova population rests on the single association GRB 111209A/SN 2011kl being real and correctly classified; if the one low-signal-to-noise spectrum or the afterglow-subtracted photometric bump is misread, the only observational anchor for such a population disappears.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If the conclusion holds, the confirmed GRB-SN connection remains limited to broad-lined Type Ic supernovae, and SN 2011kl is an outlier rather than the first member of a new class.
A second spectroscopically confirmed superluminous supernova associated with an ultra-long GRB would reopen the case for a population and directly test the review's conclusion.
The magnetar model's fine-tuning can be tested by measuring whether GRB-SNe and SLSNe occupy distinct regions in the magnetic-field versus spin-period plane predicted by spin-down models.
Off-axis or weak jets in SLSNe should produce short-lived UV flares at $10^{44}$-$10^{45}$ erg s$^{-1}$ and late-time radio afterglows, signatures that high-cadence wide-field surveys can search for.
The comparable volumetric rates of SLSNe I and ultra-long GRBs imply that even a modest beaming fraction can explain why only one coincident event has been seen in roughly twenty years.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the SN 2011kl classification is wrong, the entire observational case for a superluminous-hypernova population reduces to a single under-sampled event; a decisive test would be a high-signal-to-noise spectrum of a future ultra-long GRB supernova taken within days of the burst to seek O II P-Cygni absorption.
The two-orders-of-magnitude mismatch between the inferred spin-down timescale and the GRB duration could indicate that the two signals come from different mechanisms in the same event, such as fallback accretion powering the GRB and magnetar spin-down powering the supernova, a hybrid the review does not fully develop.
The extended helium-star progenitor model with pulsational pair instability predicts fast blue optical transients when the jet is choked or viewed off-axis; finding such transients in SLSN samples would connect ultra-long GRBs to a broader class of engine-powered explosions.
The rate comparison implies that many SLSNe could harbor hidden jets; targeted radio follow-up of nearby SLSNe could test the prediction of orphan afterglows without waiting for a GRB trigger.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Short version: this is a review, not a new claim. If you read it, the takeaway is that the GRB–SLSN link is propped up by one event, GRB 111209A/SN 2011kl, and the models that unify ultra-long GRBs with SLSNe I are plausible but not established. The authors say this explicitly, and they deserve credit for not overselling the connection.

The review does real work as a synthesis. The sections on magnetar engines, the Margalit misaligned-magnetar picture, the Moriya pulsational-pair-instability model, and the rate comparison are useful and mostly even-handed. It gives a newcomer a clear map of where the field stands. The discussion of host galaxies and competing progenitor channels is fine. The one piece of original data, a TigerFit fit to the GRB 101225A SN light curve giving 0.036 solar masses of 56Ni, is consistent with the helium-star merger scenario but is presented without uncertainties or fit details, so it carries little weight.

The main soft spot is the central conclusion. The phrase 'tends to disfavor' sounds modest, but the judgment that unified models require 'fine-tuned conditions' is never quantified. The paper itself cites Margalit et al., where a misaligned magnetar naturally partitions spin-down power between a jet and a thermal SLSN component, and Moriya et al., which is described as self-consistent and not ruled out. Those alternatives weaken the disfavoring step. The single observed event is also what a rare beamed channel would look like. That doesn't make the review wrong; it makes the headline conclusion a qualitative model-selection opinion rather than a demonstrated negative. Worth saying in a referee report.

Minor items: some object-name typos (GRB 11209A etc.), the SN 2011kl classification rests on one low-S/N spectrum, and the original fit should be flagged as preliminary. The self-citation pattern is not a problem; those cited works support context, not the load-bearing claim.

Who is this for? People writing or teaching the GRB-SN/SLSN interface, and anyone tempted to cite SN 2011kl as proof of a superluminous-hypernova class. It deserves serious peer review and publication as a review, with requests to quantify or soften the 'disfavor' claim and to clean up the fit documentation and typos. I'd send it to referees, and I'd bring it to a reading group, but I wouldn't cite it as evidence for a new class.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This review in Galaxies surveys the observational and theoretical evidence for a possible extension of the GRB–supernova connection to a superluminous hypernova population. It opens with the phenomenology of long and ultra-long GRBs, the classification of classical and superluminous supernovae, and the magnetar central-engine framework. It then discusses how a single engine could power both a GRB and an SN, reviews the candidate associations (GRB 101225A, GRB 111209A/SN 2011kl, GRB 140506A, GRB 210704A, GRB 221009A), and compares host-galaxy properties. The main conclusion, stated in Section 7, is that theoretical scenarios powering both an SLSN I and a (U)LGRB in one event require fine-tuned conditions, so the existence of a distinct superluminous hypernova population is not established and the single GRB 111209A/SN 2011kl case remains the only anchor.

Significance. If the cautious negative conclusion is read as a statement that the observational case is currently inconclusive, the review is useful and largely defensible. Its strengths are breadth, balance, and transparency: it presents both collapsar and magnetar frameworks, reproduces key comparison figures, and explicitly notes the poor signal-to-noise of the single SN 2011kl spectrum and the absence of unambiguous O II features. The review also gives a fair hearing to alternatives, including the misaligned-magnetar model of Margalit et al., the extended-helium PPI model of Moriya et al., and fallback-accretion scenarios. The main weakness is that the final 'tends to disfavor' statement is a model-selection judgment rather than a demonstrated quantitative inference, and the same paragraph contains a rate-based caveat that arguably undercuts it. The paper has no machine-checked proofs or new data release; its value lies in synthesis, and that synthesis is competent.

major comments (2)

[Section 7, final two paragraphs] The load-bearing inference that unified engines require 'fine-tuned conditions' is asserted without a quantitative criterion. The manuscript itself presents at least two alternatives that do not obviously require fine tuning: the misaligned-magnetar partition of Margalit et al. gives a continuous thermal-jet split through fth≈1.025α/(0.636+α^4)^(1/4), and the Moriya et al. extended-helium PPI model is described as 'self-consistent' and 'cannot be ruled out.' The observed single event is also expected from a rare beamed channel once the rates quoted in the same section (SLSNe I ≈40–90 Gpc^-3 yr^-1 and ULGRB ≈30 Gpc^-3 yr^-1) are multiplied by a magnetar fraction and a geometric beaming factor. To make 'tends to disfavor' a valid inference, the authors should quantify the fine-tuning claim, for example by giving the parameter-space fraction satisfying Equation (22) and the jet-breakout condition, or by computing the expected joint rate of GRB+SLSN events under the magnetar and PPI models. Absent such a calculation, the conclusion should be explicitly downgraded to 'observationally unconstrained,' especially because the final paragraph's mention of beaming and magnetar fraction already explains the paucity without invoking disfavor.
[Section 5.2 and Section 7] The review's observational anchor is SN 2011kl, but the body concedes that the association rests on one low-signal-to-noise spectrum taken about two days before maximum, with no unambiguous O II detection, and on a photometric bump recovered after subtraction of a power-law afterglow. The authors should state the logical consequence explicitly: if SN 2011kl is not a hydrogen-poor SLSN I, then the GRB–SLSN connection currently has zero confirmed members, which would strengthen the negative conclusion; if the classification is retained, a sample of one cannot statistically distinguish a rare beamed channel from a disfavored one. The conclusion should therefore be conditioned on this classification uncertainty, rather than presented in the Abstract as a settled classification ('was classified as superluminous') while the body treats it as tentative.

minor comments (4)

[Section 5.1 and Figure 5] The original bolometric light-curve fit for the GRB 101225A SN is presented without uncertainties on the data points, without the fitted parameters beyond M56Ni=0.036 M⊙, and without a description of the assumed distance, reddening, or band integration errors; this makes the new fit difficult to evaluate and should be completed or clearly marked as illustrative.
[Sections 2.1.2, 5.1, 5.2] There are several object-name inconsistencies: 'GRB 111009A' in Section 2.1.2 should be 'GRB 111209A,' 'GRB 11209A' in Section 5.2 is missing a digit, and 'GRB 1012225A' in Section 5.1 has an extra digit.
[Section 5.4.4] The discussion of SN 1997cy alternates between GRB 970514 and GRB 970403 as the possible counterpart; the text should clarify which burst is meant in each statement and why both are mentioned.
[Sections 1 and 2.2.2] There are small language typos, including 'has been been used' in Section 1 and 'cold be due' for 'could be due' in Section 2.2.2, which a copyedit pass should correct.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the review's negative conclusion is a synthesis of external models and observations, not a reduction to the authors' own fitted quantities or self-cited uniqueness claims.

full rationale

The paper is a review whose central claim—that the theoretical scenarios powering both an SLSN I and a GRB in one event require fine-tuned conditions and that this tends to disfavor a superluminous-hypernova–GRB connection—is built from independent, cited analyses rather than from the authors' own fits. The load-bearing steps are: (i) the magnetar luminosity relation in Equation (18), (ii) Ioka et al.'s two-orders-of-magnitude mismatch between the magnetar spin-down time needed for SN 2011kl (~1.1e6 s) and the GRB duration (~1e4 s), (iii) the alternative models of Metzger et al., Margalit et al. and Moriya et al., which the review explicitly weighs, and (iv) literature rate estimates for SLSNe I and ULGRBs. None of these inputs is defined in terms of the conclusion, and the conclusion is not obtained by fitting a parameter to one subset and then predicting a closely related quantity. The authors do cite their own prior works (Gendre et al. 2013; Stratta et al. 2013; Fiore et al. 2021, 2022; Crosato Menegazzi et al. 2024, 2025), but these citations serve as observational anchors and modeling context, not as a uniqueness theorem or as the sole justification for the disfavoring conclusion. The only original quantitative exercise (the 56Ni fit for GRB 101225A in Section 5.1) is peripheral to the main argument. The skeptical concern that the fine-tuning judgment is unquantified is a correctness or robustness criticism, not a circularity: the review itself presents viable alternatives that cut against its conclusion, which is the opposite of a self-confirming derivation. Hence no circular step meeting the evidentiary standard is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The review introduces no new free parameters except the peripheral 56Ni fit. Its reasoning depends on domain-level assumptions about the authenticity of the sole GRB-SLSN association, the viability of the magnetar engine, and the interpretability of rate comparisons. No new particles, forces, or exotic entities are postulated.

free parameters (1)

M56Ni of GRB 101225A SN = 0.036 M_sun
New TigerFit fit to the bolometric light curve in Figure 5. No uncertainties, covariance, or fit ranges are reported, and the fit is peripheral to the central claim.

assumptions (3)

domain assumption The photometric identification of SN 2011kl as an SLSN I is secure enough to anchor the discussion.
Section 5.2 notes the only SN spectrum has low signal-to-noise and the O II absorption is not unambiguous. If the association or classification is wrong, the central question loses its only observational anchor.
domain assumption Magnetar spin-down is a plausible common power source for LGRBs and SLSNe, with B and P inferable from light curves.
Sections 3 and 4.2 use the magnetar model to frame both GRB and SN emission. The review itself notes the absence of strong independent constraints and the fine-tuning problem raised by Ioka et al. in Section 5.2.
domain assumption The SLSN-I rate and ULGRB rate can be compared within z < 1 to argue that the lack of associations is not surprising.
Section 7 compares quoted rates, but the review does not fully establish that selection effects, redshift completeness, and beaming corrections are controlled in that comparison.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Exploring GRBs and supernovae connection: does a superluminous hypernova population exist?." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/APCAOOXQ

@misc{pith2026250412224,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Exploring GRBs and supernovae connection: does a superluminous hypernova population exist?},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/APCAOOXQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.12224}
}

read the original abstract

Observations of several gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) that are temporally and spatially compatible with energetic supernovae (hypernovae) has established their common origin. In one case (GRB 111209A/SN 2011kl) the associated supernova was classified as superluminous (SN 2011kl). The exceptional duration of the observed gamma-ray prompt emission of GRB 111209A (about 7 hours) is widely considered key to unlocking the physics behind the still mysterious origin of superluminous supernovae (SLSNe). We review the main observational and theoretical findings that may link some ultra-long GRBs to SLSNe. Specifically, we examine notable events, the role of progenitors and host galaxies in shaping these phenomena, and focus on the proposed models. While a magnetar central engine is a plausible mechanism for both luminous and long-duration GRBs, a conclusive answer remains elusive, as alternative explanations are still viable. Further observational and theoretical work is required to clarify progenitor pathways and explosion mechanisms, potentially extending the classical GRB-SN connection to rare superluminous hypernovae.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.12224 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** A schematic representation of a GRB illustrating the physical mechanisms producing the prompt and the afterglow emissions due to internal and external shocks, respectively. Credit: NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center. As is well known from stellar evolution theory, massive stars (MZAMS ≳ 8 M⊙ [2]) undergo the collapse of their degenerate cores and can be progenitors of core-collapse SNe; in a number of cases, LGRBs h… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Different components of the optical light curve of an LGRB with an associated SN. Different contributions are labeled in the top-right corner. This figure ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Distribution of different classes of GRBs according to their typical luminosity and duration. The special cases of GRB 111209A, 121027A and 101225A (see Section 5) are highlighted among a sample of ULGRBs, SGRBs, LGRBs, low-luminosity GRBs (LLGRBs in the figure) [97], soft gamma repeaters (SGRs in the figure) [98,99] and tidal disruption events (TDEs). This figure is from [88] ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p0… view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (4 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: ). light curve IIb IIL IIP IIn ejecta−CSM interaction thermonuclear core collapse yes no yes no SiII no HeI yes hypernovae strong shape Ia Ic Ib Ib/c pec I H II [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: The bolometric (UBgriz) light curve of the GRB 101225A SN fitted with a 56Ni decaypowered diffusion scheme (dashed black lines). The original multiband light curves were taken from Thöne et al. [84] and integrated to obtain the bolometric light curve (red dots) assumi…

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: The bolometric light curve of GRB 111209A/SN 2011kl (blue circles) compared with those of GRB 980425/SN 1998bw (red squares) and of soft GRB (X-ray flash) XRF 060218/SN 2006aj (yellow squares), as well with GRB-less supernovae as SN Ic 1994I (turquoise circles), SLSNe …

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Spectral comparison of SN 1997cy and SN 1999E (light-blue spectra) with SN 1998bw (green spectrum) and SN 2015bn (red spectrum) (see the text for discussion). Each spectrum was smoothed with a Savitzky–Golay filter, and the smoothed spectrum is overplotted on the origi…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

EP241021a: A catastrophic collapse/merger of compact star binary leading to the formation of a remnant millisecond magnetar?
astro-ph.HE 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

EP241021a's ten-day bump is modeled as a magnetar-powered explosion from a compact star collapse or merger, not a normal supernova.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

294 extracted references · 17 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

Identification of Two Classes of Gamma-Ray Bursts

Kouveliotou, C.; Meegan, C.A.; Fishman, G.J.; Bhat, N.P .; Briggs, M.S.; Koshut, T.M.; Paciesas, W.S.; Pendleton, G.N. Identification of Two Classes of Gamma-Ray Bursts. Astrophys. J. Lett. 1993, 413, L101. https://doi.org/10.1086/186969

doi:10.1086/186969 1993
[2]

Progenitors of Core-Collapse Supernovae

Smartt, S.J. Progenitors of Core-Collapse Supernovae. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 2009, 47, 63–106. https://doi.org/10.1146/ annurev-astro-082708-101737

2009
[3]

An unusual supernova in the error box of the γ-ray burst of 25 April 1998

Galama, T.J.; Vreeswijk, P .M.; van Paradijs, J.; Kouveliotou, C.; Augusteijn, T.; Böhnhardt, H.; Brewer, J.P .; Doublier, V .; Gonzalez, J.F.; Leibundgut, B.; et al. An unusual supernova in the error box of the γ-ray burst of 25 April 1998. Nature 1998, 395, 670–672. https://doi.org/10.1038/27150

doi:10.1038/27150 1998
[4]

Are Gamma-Ray Bursts in Star-Forming Regions?Astrophys

Paczy ´ nski, B. Are Gamma-Ray Bursts in Star-Forming Regions?Astrophys. J. Lett. 1998, 494, L45–L48. https://doi.org/10.1086/ 311148

1998
[5]

Systematics and Biases in Observations of Supernovae Associated with Gamma-Ray Bursts

Belkin, S.; Pozanenko, A. Systematics and Biases in Observations of Supernovae Associated with Gamma-Ray Bursts. Pattern Recognit. Image Anal. 2023, 33, 86–91. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1054661823020025

doi:10.1134/s1054661823020025 2023
[6]

A very luminous magnetar-powered supernova associated with an ultra-long γ-ray burst

Greiner, J.; Mazzali, P .A.; Kann, D.A.; Krühler, T.; Pian, E.; Prentice, S.; Olivares E., F.; Rossi, A.; Klose, S.;Taubenberger, S.; et al. A very luminous magnetar-powered supernova associated with an ultra-long γ-ray burst. Nature 2015, 523, 189–192. https: //doi.org/10.1038/nature14579

doi:10.1038/nature14579 2015
[7]

The Ep,I-Eiso correlation: Type I gamma-ray bursts and the new classification method

Minaev, P .Y.; Pozanenko, A.S. The Ep,I-Eiso correlation: Type I gamma-ray bursts and the new classification method. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2020, 492, 1919–1936. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz3611

doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3611 2020
[8]

Short gamma-ray bursts in the SPI-ACS INTEGRAL experiment.Astrophys

Minaev, P .Y.; Pozanenko, A.S.; Loznikov, V .M. Short gamma-ray bursts in the SPI-ACS INTEGRAL experiment.Astrophys. Bull. 2010, 65, 326–333. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1990341310040024

doi:10.1134/s1990341310040024 2010

Show all 294 references

[9]

Zhang, B.; Zhang, B.B.; Virgili, F.J.; Liang, E.W.; Kann, D.A.; Wu, X.F.; Proga, D.; Lv, H.J.; Toma, K.; Mészáros, P .; et al. Discerning the Physical Origins of Cosmological Gamma-ray Bursts Based on Multiple Observational Criteria: The Cases of z = 6.7 GRB 080913, z = 8.2 GR...

2009 doi
[10]

Intrinsic spectra and energetics of BeppoSAX Gamma-Ray Bursts with known redshifts

Amati, L.; Frontera, F.; Tavani, M.; in’t Zand, J.J.M.; Antonelli, A.; Costa, E.; Feroci, M.; Guidorzi, C.; Heise, J.; Masetti, N.; et al. Intrinsic spectra and energetics of BeppoSAX Gamma-Ray Bursts with known redshifts. Astron. Astrophys. 2002, 390, 81–89. https://doi.org/1...

2002 doi
[11]

The E p,i-Eiso correlation in gamma-ray bursts: Updated observational status, re-analysis and main implications

Amati, L. The E p,i-Eiso correlation in gamma-ray bursts: Updated observational status, re-analysis and main implications. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2006, 372, 233–245. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10840.x

2006
[12]

Measuring the cosmological parameters with the Ep,i-Eiso correlation of gamma-ray bursts

Amati, L.; Guidorzi, C.; Frontera, F.; Della Valle, M.; Finelli, F.; Landi, R.; Montanari, E. Measuring the cosmological parameters with the Ep,i-Eiso correlation of gamma-ray bursts. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2008, 391, 577–584. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2 966.2008.13943...

2008
[13]

Extremely energetic Fermi gamma-ray bursts obey spectral energy correlations

Amati, L.; Frontera, F.; Guidorzi, C. Extremely energetic Fermi gamma-ray bursts obey spectral energy correlations. Astron. Astrophys. 2009, 508, 173–180. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/200912788

2009 doi
[14]

How Long does a Burst Burst? Astrophys

Zhang, B.B.; Zhang, B.; Murase, K.; Connaughton, V .; Briggs, M.S. How Long does a Burst Burst? Astrophys. J. 2014, 787, 66. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/787/1/66

2014 doi
[16]

GRB 091024A and the Nature of Ultra-long Gamma-Ray Bursts

Virgili, F.J.; Mundell, C.G.; Pal’shin, V .; Guidorzi, C.; Margutti, R.; Melandri, A.; Harrison, R.; Kobayashi, S.; Chornock, R.; Henden, A.; et al. GRB 091024A and the Nature of Ultra-long Gamma-Ray Bursts. Astrophys. J. 2013, 778, 54. https: //doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/778/1/54

2013 doi
[17]

Are Ultra-long Gamma-Ray Bursts Different? Astrophys

Boër, M.; Gendre, B.; Stratta, G. Are Ultra-long Gamma-Ray Bursts Different? Astrophys. J. 2015, 800, 16. https://doi.org/10.108 8/0004-637X/800/1/16

2015
[18]

Gamma-Ray Bursts and Type Ic Supernova SN 1998bw.Astrophys

Woosley, S.E.; Eastman, R.G.; Schmidt, B.P . Gamma-Ray Bursts and Type Ic Supernova SN 1998bw.Astrophys. J. 1999, 516, 788. https://doi.org/10.1086/307131

1999 doi
[19]

Gamma-Ray Bursts: Multiwavelength Investigations and Models

Pozanenko, A.S.; Barkov, M.V .; Minaev, P .Y.; Volnova, A.A. Gamma-Ray Bursts: Multiwavelength Investigations and Models. Astron. Lett. 2021, 47, 791–830. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063773721120033

2021 doi
[20]

A brief history of the discovery of cosmic gamma-ray bursts

Bonnell, J.T.; Klebesadel, R.W. A brief history of the discovery of cosmic gamma-ray bursts. In Proceedings of the Gamma-ray Bursts: 3rd Huntsville Symposium, Huntsville, AL, USA, 25–27 October 1995; AIP: Melville, NY, USA, 1996; Volume 384, pp. 977–980, American Institute of ...

1995 doi
[21]

Gamma-ray Bursts: 50 Years and Counting! Universe 2024, 10, 57

Vigliano, A.A.; Longo, F. Gamma-ray Bursts: 50 Years and Counting! Universe 2024, 10, 57. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe100 20057

2024 doi
[22]

Observations of Gamma-Ray Bursts of Cosmic Origin

Klebesadel, R.W.; Strong, I.B.; Olson, R.A. Observations of Gamma-Ray Bursts of Cosmic Origin. Astrophys. J. Lett. 1973, 182, L85. https://doi.org/10.1086/181225

1973 doi
[23]

Gamma-ray bursters at cosmological distances

Paczynski, B. Gamma-ray bursters at cosmological distances. Astrophys. J. Lett. 1986, 308, L43–L46. https://doi.org/10.1086/18 4740

1986 doi
[24]

Spatial distribution of γ-ray bursts observed by BATSE

Meegan, C.A.; Fishman, G.J.; Wilson, R.B.; Paciesas, W.S.; Pendleton, G.N.; Horack, J.M.; Brock, M.N.; Kouveliotou, C. Spatial distribution of γ-ray bursts observed by BATSE. Nature 1992, 355, 143–145. https://doi.org/10.1038/355143a0

1992 doi
[25]

Gamma-ray bursts and the fireball model.Phys

Piran, T. Gamma-ray bursts and the fireball model.Phys. Rep. 1999, 314, 575–667. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-1573(98)00127-6

1999 doi
[26]

BATSE Observations of Gamma-Ray Burst Spectra

Band, D.; Matteson, J.; Ford, L.; Schaefer, B.; Palmer, D.; Teegarden, B.; Cline, T.; Briggs, M.; Paciesas, W.; Pendleton, G.; et al. BATSE Observations of Gamma-Ray Burst Spectra. I. Spectral Diversity. Astrophys. J. 1993, 413, 281. https://doi.org/10.1086/17 2995

1993 doi
[27]

A qualitative study of cosmic fireballs and gamma -ray bursts

Cavallo, G.; Rees, M.J. A qualitative study of cosmic fireballs and gamma -ray bursts. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 1978, 183, 359–365. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/183.3.359

1978 doi
[28]

Relativistic fireballs—Energy conversion and time-scales

Rees, M.J.; Meszaros, P . Relativistic fireballs—Energy conversion and time-scales. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 1992, 258, 41. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/258.1.41P

1992 doi
[29]

Relativistic Fireballs and Their Impact on External Matter: Models for Cosmological Gamma-Ray Bursts

Meszaros, P .; Rees, M.J. Relativistic Fireballs and Their Impact on External Matter: Models for Cosmological Gamma-Ray Bursts. Astrophys. J. 1993, 405, 278. https://doi.org/10.1086/172360

1993 doi
[30]

Gasdynamics of Relativistically Expanding Gamma-Ray Burst Sources: Kinematics, Energetics, Magnetic Fields, and Efficiency

Meszaros, P .; Laguna, P .; Rees, M.J. Gasdynamics of Relativistically Expanding Gamma-Ray Burst Sources: Kinematics, Energetics, Magnetic Fields, and Efficiency. Astrophys. J. 1993, 415, 181. https://doi.org/10.1086/173154

1993 doi
[31]

Unsteady Outflow Models for Cosmological Gamma-Ray Bursts

Rees, M.J.; Meszaros, P . Unsteady Outflow Models for Cosmological Gamma-Ray Bursts. Astrophys. J. Lett. 1994, 430, L93. https://doi.org/10.1086/187446

1994 doi
[32]

Electromagnetic extraction of energy from Kerr black holes

Blandford, R.D.; Znajek, R.L. Electromagnetic extraction of energy from Kerr black holes. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 1977, 179, 433–456. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/179.3.433

1977 doi
[33]

Gamma-Ray Bursts from Stellar Mass Accretion Disks around Black Holes

Woosley, S.E. Gamma-Ray Bursts from Stellar Mass Accretion Disks around Black Holes. Astrophys. J. 1993, 405, 273. https://doi.org/10.1086/172359

1993 doi
[34]

Millisecond pulsars with extremely strong magnetic fields as a cosmological source ofγ-ray bursts

Usov, V .V . Millisecond pulsars with extremely strong magnetic fields as a cosmological source ofγ-ray bursts. Nature 1992, 357, 472–474. https://doi.org/10.1038/357472a0

1992 doi
[35]

On the Nature of Nonthermal Radiation from Cosmological Gamma-Ray Bursters.Mon

Usov, V .V . On the Nature of Nonthermal Radiation from Cosmological Gamma-Ray Bursters.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 1994, 267, 1035. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/267.4.1035

1994 doi
[37]

Nucleosynthesis, neutrino bursts and γ-rays from coalescing neutron stars

Eichler, D.; Livio, M.; Piran, T.; Schramm, D.N. Nucleosynthesis, neutrino bursts and γ-rays from coalescing neutron stars. Nature 1989, 340, 126–128. https://doi.org/10.1038/340126a0

1989 doi
[38]

Hyperaccreting Black Holes and Gamma-Ray Bursts

Popham, R.; Woosley, S.E.; Fryer, C. Hyperaccreting Black Holes and Gamma-Ray Bursts. Astrophys. J. 1999, 518, 356–374. https://doi.org/10.1086/307259. Galaxies 2025, 1, 0 41 of 60

1999 doi
[39]

Gamma-ray bursts from accreting black holes in neutron star mergers

Ruffert, M.; Janka, H.T. Gamma-ray bursts from accreting black holes in neutron star mergers. Astron. Astrophys. 1999, 344, 573–606. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9809280

1999 doi arXiv
[40]

Accretion Models of Gamma-Ray Bursts.Astrophys

Narayan, R.; Piran, T.; Kumar, P . Accretion Models of Gamma-Ray Bursts.Astrophys. J. 2001, 557, 949–957. https://doi.org/10.1 086/322267

2001
[41]

Can Neutrino-cooled Accretion Disks Be an Origin of Gamma-Ray Bursts?Astrophys

Kohri, K.; Mineshige, S. Can Neutrino-cooled Accretion Disks Be an Origin of Gamma-Ray Bursts?Astrophys. J. 2002, 577, 311–321. https://doi.org/10.1086/342166

2002 doi
[43]

Neutrino-cooled Accretion Disks around Spinning Black Holes

Chen, W.X.; Beloborodov, A.M. Neutrino-cooled Accretion Disks around Spinning Black Holes. In Proceedings of the Gamma-Ray Bursts in the Swift Era, Washington, DC, USA, 29 November–2 December 2005; AIP: Melville, NY, USA, 2006; Volume 836, pp. 193–196, American Institute of Ph...

2005 doi
[44]

Structure and Luminosity of Neutrino-cooled Accretion Disks.Astrophys

Liu, T.; Gu, W.M.; Xue, L.; Lu, J.F. Structure and Luminosity of Neutrino-cooled Accretion Disks.Astrophys. J. 2007, 661, 1025–1033. https://doi.org/10.1086/513689

2007 doi
[45]

Neutrino pair annihilation near accreting, stellar-mass black holes

Birkl, R.; Aloy, M.A.; Janka, H.T.; Müller, E. Neutrino pair annihilation near accreting, stellar-mass black holes. Astron. Astrophys. 2007, 463, 51–67. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20066293

2007 doi
[47]

Can Black Hole Neutrino-cooled Disks Power Short Gamma-Ray Bursts? Astrophys

Liu, T.; Lin, Y.Q.; Hou, S.J.; Gu, W.M. Can Black Hole Neutrino-cooled Disks Power Short Gamma-Ray Bursts? Astrophys. J. 2015, 806, 58. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/806/1/58

2015 doi
[48]

Neutrino-dominated accretion flows as the central engine of gamma-ray bursts

Liu, T.; Gu, W.M.; Zhang, B. Neutrino-dominated accretion flows as the central engine of gamma-ray bursts. New Astron. Rev. 2017, 79, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newar.2017.07.001

2017 doi
[49]

Testing the neutrino annihilation model for launching GRB jets

Leng, M.; Giannios, D. Testing the neutrino annihilation model for launching GRB jets. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2014, 445, L1–L5. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnrasl/slu122

2014 doi
[50]

Are gamma-ray bursts optically thick? Astrophys

Goodman, J. Are gamma-ray bursts optically thick? Astrophys. J. Lett. 1986, 308, L47. https://doi.org/10.1086/184741

1986 doi
[51]

Relativistic Motion in Gamma-Ray Bursts

Krolik, J.H.; Pier, E.A. Relativistic Motion in Gamma-Ray Bursts. Astrophys. J. 1991, 373, 277. https://doi.org/10.1086/170048

1991 doi
[52]

Plasmas in Gamma-Ray Bursts: Particle acceleration, magnetic fields, radiative Processes and environments

Pe’er, A. Plasmas in Gamma-Ray Bursts: Particle acceleration, magnetic fields, radiative Processes and environments. Galaxies 2019, 7, 33

2019
[53]

Magnetic field production via the Weibel instability in interpenetrating plasma flows

Huntington, C.M.; Manuel, M.J.E.; Ross, J.S.; Wilks, S.C.; Fiuza, F.; Rinderknecht, H.G.; Park, H.S.; Gregori, G.; Higginson, D.P .; Park, J.; et al. Magnetic field production via the Weibel instability in interpenetrating plasma flows. Phys. Plasmas 2017, 24, 041410. https://...

2017 doi
[55]

Rapid variability in the synchrotron self-Compton model for blazars

Chiaberge, M.; Ghisellini, G. Rapid variability in the synchrotron self-Compton model for blazars. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 1999, 306, 551–560. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02538.x

1999
[56]

Observation of inverse Compton emission from a long γ-ray burst

Veres, P .; Bhat, P .N.; Briggs, M.S.; Cleveland, W.H.; Hamburg, R.; Hui, C.M.; Mailyan, B.; Preece, R.D.; Roberts, O.J.; von Kienlin, A.; et al. Observation of inverse Compton emission from a long γ-ray burst. Nature 2019, 575, 459–463. https: //doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1754-6

2019 doi
[57]

Gamma-Ray Bursts Afterglow Physics and the VHE Domain

Miceli, D.; Nava, L. Gamma-Ray Bursts Afterglow Physics and the VHE Domain. Galaxies 2022, 10, 66. https://doi.org/10.3390/ galaxies10030066

2022
[58]

The Internal-collision-induced Magnetic Reconnection and Turbulence (ICMART) Model of Gamma-ray Bursts

Zhang, B.; Yan, H. The Internal-collision-induced Magnetic Reconnection and Turbulence (ICMART) Model of Gamma-ray Bursts. Astrophys. J. 2011, 726, 90. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/726/2/90

2011 doi
[59]

Fermi Observations of High-Energy Gamma-Ray Emission from GRB 080916C

Abdo, A.A.; Ackermann, M.; Arimoto, M.; Asano, K.; Atwood, W.B.; Axelsson, M.; Baldini, L.; Ballet, J.; Band, D.L.; Barbiellini, G.; et al. Fermi Observations of High-Energy Gamma-Ray Emission from GRB 080916C. Science 2009, 323, 1688. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1169101

2009 doi
[60]

The Fireball Model of Gamma-Ray Bursts

Mészáros, P . The Fireball Model of Gamma-Ray Bursts. Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 2001, 143, 33–49. https://doi.org/10.1143/PTPS. 143.33

2001 doi
[61]

Physics of Gamma-Ray Bursts Prompt Emission

Pe’er, A. Physics of Gamma-Ray Bursts Prompt Emission. Adv. Astron. 2015, 2015, 907321. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/907321

2015 doi
[62]

An overview of the current understanding of Gamma Ray Bursts in the Fermi era

Bhat, P .N.; Guiriec, S. An overview of the current understanding of Gamma Ray Bursts in the Fermi era. Bull. Astron. Soc. India 2011, 39, 471–515. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1111.4909

2011 doi arXiv
[64]

Acceleration of GRB outflows by Poynting flux dissipation

Drenkhahn, G. Acceleration of GRB outflows by Poynting flux dissipation. Astron. Astrophys. 2002, 387, 714–724. https: //doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20020390

2002 doi
[65]

Efficient acceleration and radiation in Poynting flux powered GRB outflows

Drenkhahn, G.; Spruit, H.C. Efficient acceleration and radiation in Poynting flux powered GRB outflows. Astron. Astrophys. 2002, 391, 1141–1153. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20020839. Galaxies 2025, 1, 0 42 of 60

2002 doi
[66]

Gamma Ray Bursts as Electromagnetic Outflows

Lyutikov, M.; Blandford, R. Gamma Ray Bursts as Electromagnetic Outflows. arXiv 2003, arXiv:astro-ph/0312347. https: //doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0312347

2003 doi arXiv
[67]

The Jet Composition of GRB 230307A: Poynting-Flux-Dominated Outflow? Mon

Du, Z.W.; Lü, H.; Liu, X.; Liang, E. The Jet Composition of GRB 230307A: Poynting-Flux-Dominated Outflow? Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. Lett. 2024, 529, L67–L72

2024
[68]

An Analysis of Gamma-Ray Burst Spectral Break Models

Zhang, B.; Meszaros, P . An Analysis of Gamma-Ray Burst Spectral Break Models. Astrophys. J. 2002, 581, 1236–1247. https: //doi.org/10.1086/344338

2002 doi
[69]

Events in the life of a cocoon surrounding a light, collapsar jet

Ramirez-Ruiz, E.; Celotti, A.; Rees, M.J. Events in the life of a cocoon surrounding a light, collapsar jet. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2002, 337, 1349–1356. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05995.x

2002
[70]

Universal GRB Jets from Jet-Cocoon Interaction in Massive Stars

Lazzati, D.; Begelman, M.C. Universal GRB Jets from Jet-Cocoon Interaction in Massive Stars. Astrophys. J. 2005, 629, 903–907. https://doi.org/10.1086/430877

2005 doi
[71]

The cocoon emission—An electromagnetic counterpart to gravitational waves from neutron star mergers

Gottlieb, O.; Nakar, E.; Piran, T. The cocoon emission—An electromagnetic counterpart to gravitational waves from neutron star mergers. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2018, 473, 576–584. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx2357

2018 doi
[72]

Observational signatures of stellar explosions driven by relativistic jets

Eisenberg, M.; Gottlieb, O.; Nakar, E. Observational signatures of stellar explosions driven by relativistic jets. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2022, 517, 582–596. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac2184

2022 doi
[73]

Short-duration Gamma-ray Bursts From Off-axis Collapsars

Lazzati, D.; Morsony, B.J.; Begelman, M.C. Short-duration Gamma-ray Bursts From Off-axis Collapsars. Astrophys. J. 2010, 717, 239–244. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/717/1/239

2010 doi
[74]

The Propagation of Relativistic Jets in External Media

Bromberg, O.; Nakar, E.; Piran, T.; Sari, R. The Propagation of Relativistic Jets in External Media. Astrophys. J. 2011, 740, 100. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/740/2/100

2011 doi
[75]

The Observable Signatures of Grb Cocoons

Nakar, E.; Piran, T. The Observable Signatures of Grb Cocoons. Astrophys. J. 2016, 834, 28. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ 834/1/28

2016 doi
[76]

Three Types of Gamma-Ray Bursts

Mukherjee, S.; Feigelson, E.D.; Jogesh Babu, G.; Murtagh, F.; Fraley, C.; Raftery, A. Three Types of Gamma-Ray Bursts. Astrophys. J. 1998, 508, 314–327. https://doi.org/10.1086/306386

1998 doi
[77]

GRB 100816A and the nature of intermediate duration gamma-ray bursts

Tunnicliffe, R.L.; Levan, A. GRB 100816A and the nature of intermediate duration gamma-ray bursts. In Proceedings of the Death of Massive Stars: Supernovae and Gamma-Ray Bursts, Nikko, Japan, 12–26 March 2012; Volume 279, pp. 415–416. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743921312013610

2012 doi
[78]

Short Gamma-Ray Bursts with Extended Emission.Astrophys

Norris, J.P .; Bonnell, J.T. Short Gamma-Ray Bursts with Extended Emission.Astrophys. J. 2006, 643, 266–275. https://doi.org/10.1 086/502796

2006
[79]

A kilonova following a long-duration gamma-ray burst at 350 Mpc

Rastinejad, J.C.; Gompertz, B.P .; Levan, A.J.; Fong, W.f.; Nicholl, M.; Lamb, G.P .; Malesani, D.B.; Nugent, A.E.; Oates, S.R.; Tanvir, N.R.; et al. A kilonova following a long-duration gamma-ray burst at 350 Mpc. Nature 2022, 612, 223–227. https: //doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05390-w

2022 doi
[80]

A long-duration gamma-ray burst with a peculiar origin

Yang, J.; Ai, S.; Zhang, B.B.; Zhang, B.; Liu, Z.K.; Wang, X.I.; Yang, Y.H.; Yin, Y.H.; Li, Y.; Lü, H.J. A long-duration gamma-ray burst with a peculiar origin. Nature 2022, 612, 232–235. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05403-8

2022 doi
[81]

BATSE Observations of Gamma-Ray Burst Tails.Astrophys

Connaughton, V . BATSE Observations of Gamma-Ray Burst Tails.Astrophys. J. 2002, 567, 1028–1036. https://doi.org/10.1086/33 8695

2002 doi
[82]

Superlong Gamma-Ray Bursts

Tikhomirova, Y.Y.; Stern, B.E. Superlong Gamma-Ray Bursts. Astron. Lett. 2005, 31, 291–298. https://doi.org/10.1134/1.1922527

2005 doi
[83]

Fermi/GBM observations of the ultra-long GRB 091024

Gruber, D.; Krühler, T.; Foley, S.; Nardini, M.; Burlon, D.; Rau, A.; Bissaldi, E.; von Kienlin, A.; McBreen, S.; Greiner, J.; et al. Fermi/GBM observations of the ultra-long GRB 091024. A burst with an optical flash. Astron. Astrophys. 2011, 528, A15. https://doi.org/10.1051/...

2011 doi
[84]

The unusualγ-ray burst GRB 101225A from a helium star/neutron star merger at redshift 0.33

Thöne, C.C.; de Ugarte Postigo, A.; Fryer, C.L.; Page, K.L.; Gorosabel, J.; Aloy, M.A.; Perley, D.A.; Kouveliotou, C.; Janka, H.T.; Mimica, P .; et al. The unusualγ-ray burst GRB 101225A from a helium star/neutron star merger at redshift 0.33. Nature 2011, 480, 72–74. https://...

2011 doi
[85]

The Ultra-long Gamma-Ray Burst 111209A: The Collapse of a Blue Supergiant? Astrophys

Gendre, B.; Stratta, G.; Atteia, J.L.; Basa, S.; Boër, M.; Coward, D.M.; Cutini, S.; D’Elia, V .; Howell, E.J.; Klotz, A.; et al. The Ultra-long Gamma-Ray Burst 111209A: The Collapse of a Blue Supergiant? Astrophys. J. 2013, 766, 30. https://doi.org/10.1088/ 0004-637X/766/1/30

2013
[86]

The Ultra-long GRB 111209A

Stratta, G.; Gendre, B.; Atteia, J.L.; Boër, M.; Coward, D.M.; De Pasquale, M.; Howell, E.; Klotz, A.; Oates, S.; Piro, L. The Ultra-long GRB 111209A. II. Prompt to Afterglow and Afterglow Properties. Astrophys. J. 2013, 779, 66. https://doi.org/10.1088/ 0004-637X/779/1/66

2013
[87]

GRB 130925A: An ultralong gamma ray burst with a dust-echo afterglow, and implications for the origin of the ultralong GRBs

Evans, P .A.; Willingale, R.; Osborne, J.P .; O’Brien, P .T.; Tanvir, N.R.; Frederiks, D.D.; Pal’shin, V .D.; Svinkin, D.S.; Lien, A.; Cummings, J.; et al. GRB 130925A: An ultralong gamma ray burst with a dust-echo afterglow, and implications for the origin of the ultralong GR...

2014 doi
[88]

A New Population of Ultra-long Duration Gamma-Ray Bursts

Levan, A.J.; Tanvir, N.R.; Starling, R.L.C.; Wiersema, K.; Page, K.L.; Perley, D.A.; Schulze, S.; Wynn, G.A.; Chornock, R.; Hjorth, J.; et al. A New Population of Ultra-long Duration Gamma-Ray Bursts. Astrophys. J. 2014, 781, 13. https://doi.org/10.108 8/0004-637X/781/1/13. Ga...

2014
[89]

A Hot Cocoon in the Ultralong GRB 130925A: Hints of a POPIII-like Progenitor in a Low-Density Wind Environment

Piro, L.; Troja, E.; Gendre, B.; Ghisellini, G.; Ricci, R.; Bannister, K.; Fiore, F.; Kidd, L.A.; Piranomonte, S.; Wieringa, M.H. A Hot Cocoon in the Ultralong GRB 130925A: Hints of a POPIII-like Progenitor in a Low-Density Wind Environment. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2014, 790, L15....

2014 doi
[90]

Exploring the Origin of Ultralong Gamma-Ray Bursts: Lessons from GRB 221009A

Ror, A.K.; Gupta, R.; Aryan, A.; Pandey, S.B.; Oates, S.R.; Castro-Tirado, A.J.; Kumar, S. Exploring the Origin of Ultralong Gamma-Ray Bursts: Lessons from GRB 221009A. Astrophys. J. 2024, 971, 163. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad5554

2024 doi
[91]

The association of GRB 060218 with a supernova and the evolution of the shock wave

Campana, S.; Mangano, V .; Blustin, A.J.; Brown, P .; Burrows, D.N.; Chincarini, G.; Cummings, J.R.; Cusumano, G.; Della Valle, M.; Malesani, D.; et al. The association of GRB 060218 with a supernova and the evolution of the shock wave. Nature 2006, 442, 1008–1010. https://doi...

2006 doi
[92]

Discovery of the nearby long, soft GRB 100316D with an associated supernova

Starling, R.L.C.; Wiersema, K.; Levan, A.J.; Sakamoto, T.; Bersier, D.; Goldoni, P .; Oates, S.R.; Rowlinson, A.; Campana, S.; Sollerman, J.; et al. Discovery of the nearby long, soft GRB 100316D with an associated supernova. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2011, 411, 2792–2803. htt...

2011
[93]

Neutron star dynamos and the origins of pulsar magnetism

Thompson, C.; Duncan, R.C. Neutron star dynamos and the origins of pulsar magnetism. Astrophys. J. 1993, 408, 194–217

1993
[94]

The source of magnetic fields in (neutron-) stars

Spruit, H.C. The source of magnetic fields in (neutron-) stars. Proc. Int. Astron. Union 2008, 4, 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1 743921309030075

2008 doi
[95]

Ultra-long Gamma-Ray Bursts from the Collapse of Blue Supergiant Stars: An End-to-end Simulation

Perna, R.; Lazzati, D.; Cantiello, M. Ultra-long Gamma-Ray Bursts from the Collapse of Blue Supergiant Stars: An End-to-end Simulation. Astrophys. J. 2018, 859, 48. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aabcc1

2018 doi
[96]

Highly luminous supernovae associated with gamma-ray bursts

Kann, D.A.; Schady, P .; Olivares E., F.; Klose, S.; Rossi, A.; Perley, D.A.; Krühler, T.; Greiner, J.; Nicuesa Guelbenzu, A.; Elliott, J.; et al. Highly luminous supernovae associated with gamma-ray bursts. I. GRB 111209A/SN 2011kl in the context of stripped-envelope and supe...

2019 doi
[97]

Low-Luminosity Gamma-Ray Bursts as a Unique Population: Luminosity Function, Local Rate, and Beaming Factor

Liang, E.; Zhang, B.; Virgili, F.; Dai, Z.G. Low-Luminosity Gamma-Ray Bursts as a Unique Population: Luminosity Function, Local Rate, and Beaming Factor. Astrophys. J. 2007, 662, 1111–1118. https://doi.org/10.1086/517959

2007 doi
[98]

Soft gamma repeaters and anomalous X-ray pulsars: Magnetar candidates

Woods, P .M.; Thompson, C. Soft gamma repeaters and anomalous X-ray pulsars: Magnetar candidates. InCompact Stellar X-Ray Sources; Lewin, W.H.G., van der Klis, M., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2006; Volume 39, pp. 547–586. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.ast...

2006 doi arXiv
[99]

The strongest cosmic magnets: Soft gamma-ray repeaters and anomalous X-ray pulsars

Mereghetti, S. The strongest cosmic magnets: Soft gamma-ray repeaters and anomalous X-ray pulsars. Astron. Astrophys. Rev. 2008, 15, 225–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00159-008-0011-z

2008 doi
[100]

A Brief Review of Historical Supernovae

Al Dallal, S.; Azzam, W.J. A Brief Review of Historical Supernovae. Int. J. Astron. Astrophys. 2021, 11, 73–86. https: //doi.org/10.4236/ijaa.2021.111005

2021
[101]

The Guest Star of AD185 must have been a Supernova

Zhao, F.Y.; Strom, R.G.; Jiang, S.Y. The Guest Star of AD185 must have been a Supernova. Chin. J. Astron. Astrophys. 2006, 6, 635–640. https://doi.org/10.1088/1009-9271/6/5/17

2006 doi
[102]

Failed Supernovae

MacFadyen, A.I.; Woosley, S.E. Collapsars: Gamma-Ray Bursts and Explosions in “Failed Supernovae”. Astrophys. J. 1999, 524, 262–289. https://doi.org/10.1086/307790

1999 doi
[103]

Explosion Mechanisms of Core-Collapse Supernovae

Janka, H.T. Explosion Mechanisms of Core-Collapse Supernovae. Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 2012, 62, 407–451. https: //doi.org/10.1146/annurev-nucl-102711-094901

2012 doi
[104]

New Two-dimensional Models of Supernova Explosions by the Neutrino-heating Mechanism: Evidence for Different Instability Regimes in Collapsing Stellar Cores

Müller, B.; Janka, H.T.; Heger, A. New Two-dimensional Models of Supernova Explosions by the Neutrino-heating Mechanism: Evidence for Different Instability Regimes in Collapsing Stellar Cores. Astrophys. J. 2012, 761, 72. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-6 37X/761/1/72

2012 doi
[105]

Colloquium: Perspectives on core-collapse supernova theory

Burrows, A. Colloquium: Perspectives on core-collapse supernova theory. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2013, 85, 245–261. https: //doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.85.245

2013 doi
[106]

Revival of a stalled supernova shock by neutrino heating

Bethe, H.A.; Wilson, J.R. Revival of a stalled supernova shock by neutrino heating. Astrophys. J. 1985, 295, 14–23. https: //doi.org/10.1086/163343

1985 doi
[107]

A New Multi-Dimensional General Relativistic Neutrino Hydrodynamics Code of Core- Collapse Supernovae

Müller, B.; Janka, H.T.; Marek, A. A New Multi-Dimensional General Relativistic Neutrino Hydrodynamics Code of Core- Collapse Supernovae. III. Gravitational Wave Signals from Supernova Explosion Models. Astrophys. J. 2013, 766, 43. https: //doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/766/1/43

2013 doi
[108]

A Numerical Method for Solving the Neutrino Boltzmann Equation Coupled to Spherically Symmetric Stellar Core Collapse

Mezzacappa, A.; Bruenn, S.W. A Numerical Method for Solving the Neutrino Boltzmann Equation Coupled to Spherically Symmetric Stellar Core Collapse. Astrophys. J. 1993, 405, 669. https://doi.org/10.1086/172395

1993 doi
[109]

Short-duration gamma-ray bursts with extended emission from protomagnetar spin-down

Metzger, B.D.; Quataert, E.; Thompson, T.A. Short-duration gamma-ray bursts with extended emission from protomagnetar spin-down. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2008, 385, 1455–1460. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.12923.x

2008
[110]

The Proto-Neutron Star Phase of the Collapsar Model and the Route to Long-Soft Gamma-Ray Bursts and Hypernovae

Dessart, L.; Burrows, A.; Livne, E.; Ott, C.D. The Proto-Neutron Star Phase of the Collapsar Model and the Route to Long-Soft Gamma-Ray Bursts and Hypernovae. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2008, 673, L43. https://doi.org/10.1086/527519

2008 doi
[111]

Short gamma-ray bursts with extended emission from magnetar birth: jet formation and collimation

Bucciantini, N.; Metzger, B.D.; Thompson, T.A.; Quataert, E. Short gamma-ray bursts with extended emission from magnetar birth: jet formation and collimation. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2012, 419, 1537–1545. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19810.x

2012
[112]

Proto-magnetar jets as central engines for broad-lined Type Ic supernovae

Shankar, S.; Mösta, P .; Barnes, J.; Duffell, P .C.; Kasen, D. Proto-magnetar jets as central engines for broad-lined Type Ic supernovae. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2021, 508, 5390–5401. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab2964. Galaxies 2025, 1, 0 44 of 60

2021 doi
[113]

A GRB and Broad-lined Type Ic Supernova from a Single Central Engine

Barnes, J.; Duffell, P .C.; Liu, Y.; Modjaz, M.; Bianco, F.B.; Kasen, D.; MacFadyen, A.I. A GRB and Broad-lined Type Ic Supernova from a Single Central Engine. Astrophys. J. 2018, 860, 38. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aabf84

2018 doi
[114]

On the Duration of Long GRBs: Effects of Black Hole Spin

Janiuk, A.; Moderski, R.; Proga, D. On the Duration of Long GRBs: Effects of Black Hole Spin. Astrophys. J. 2008, 687, 433–442. https://doi.org/10.1086/591841

2008 doi
[115]

Variety of disc wind-driven explosions in massive rotating stars

Crosato Menegazzi, L.; Fujibayashi, S.; Takahashi, K.; Ishii, A. Variety of disc wind-driven explosions in massive rotating stars. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2024, 529, 178–195. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae544

2024 doi
[116]

Variety of disc wind-driven explosions in massive rotating stars—II

Menegazzi, L.C.; Fujibayashi, S.; Shibata, M.; Betranhandy, A.; Takahashi, K. Variety of disc wind-driven explosions in massive rotating stars—II. Dependence on the progenitor. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2025, 537, 2850–2867. https://doi.org/10.1093/ mnras/staf179

2025
[117]

Protomagnetar and black hole formation in high-mass stars

Obergaulinger, M.; Aloy, M.Á. Protomagnetar and black hole formation in high-mass stars. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2017, 469, L43–L47. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnrasl/slx046

2017 doi
[118]

Magnetorotational core collapse of possible GRB progenitors—I

Obergaulinger, M.; Aloy, M.Á. Magnetorotational core collapse of possible GRB progenitors—I. Explosion mechanisms. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2020, 492, 4613–4634. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa096

2020 doi
[119]

Characterizing the Gravitational Wave Signal from Core-collapse Supernovae

Radice, D.; Morozova, V .; Burrows, A.; Vartanyan, D.; Nagakura, H. Characterizing the Gravitational Wave Signal from Core-collapse Supernovae. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2019, 876, L9. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ab191a

2019 doi
[120]

LSST: From Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products

Ivezi´ c, Ž.; Kahn, S.M.; Tyson, J.A.; Abel, B.; Acosta, E.; Allsman, R.; Alonso, D.; AlSayyad, Y.; Anderson, S.F.;Andrew, J.; et al. LSST: From Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products. Astrophys. J. 2019, 873, 111. https://doi.org/10 .3847/1538-4357/ab042c

2019
[121]

The Automatic Learning for the Rapid Classification of Events (ALeRCE) Alert Broker

Förster, F.; Cabrera-Vives, G.; Castillo-Navarrete, E.; Estévez, P .A.; Sánchez-Sáez, P .; Arredondo, J.; Bauer, F.E.; Carrasco-Davis, R.; Catelan, M.; Elorrieta, F.; et al. The Automatic Learning for the Rapid Classification of Events (ALeRCE) Alert Broker. Astron. J. 2021, 1...

2021 doi
[122]

Classification of Supernovae

Turatto, M. Classification of Supernovae. In Supernovae and Gamma-Ray Bursters ; Weiler, K., Ed.; Lecture Notes in Physics; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2003; Volume 598, pp. 21–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45863-8_3

2003 doi
[123]

The fate of accreting white dwarfs: Type I supernovae vs

Nomoto, K. The fate of accreting white dwarfs: Type I supernovae vs. collapse. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 1986, 17, 249–266. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0146-6410(86)90020-7

1986 doi
[124]

Type Ia supernovae from chemically segregated white dwarfs

Bravo, E.; Isern, J.; Piersanti, L. Type Ia supernovae from chemically segregated white dwarfs. Astron. Astrophys. 2024, 683, A237. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202348187

2024 doi
[125]

Type Ia supernovae

Blondin, S. Type Ia supernovae. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2411.09740

2024 arXiv
[126]

The Supernova Gamma-Ray Burst Connection

Woosley, S.E.; Heger, A. The Supernova Gamma-Ray Burst Connection. In Proceedings of the Gamma-Ray Bursts in the Swift Era, Washington, DC, USA, 29 November–2 December 2005; AIP: Melville, NY, USA, 2006; Volume 836, pp. 398–407. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2207927

2005 doi
[127]

Physics of Core-Collapse Supernovae in Three Dimensions: A Sneak Preview

Janka, H.T.; Melson, T.; Summa, A. Physics of Core-Collapse Supernovae in Three Dimensions: A Sneak Preview. Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 2016, 66, 341–375. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-nucl-102115-044747

2016 doi
[128]

Core-collapse supernova explosion theory

Burrows, A.; Vartanyan, D. Core-collapse supernova explosion theory. Nature 2021, 589, 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586 -020-03059-w

2021 doi
[129]

Self-consistent 3D Supernova Models From -7 Minutes to +7 s: A 1-bethe Explosion of a 19 M⊙ Progenitor

Bollig, R.; Yadav, N.; Kresse, D.; Janka, H.T.; Müller, B.; Heger, A. Self-consistent 3D Supernova Models From -7 Minutes to +7 s: A 1-bethe Explosion of a 19 M⊙ Progenitor. Astrophys. J. 2021, 915, 28. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/abf82e

2021 doi
[130]

Gravitational-wave signal of a core-collapse supernova explosion of a 15 M ⊙ star

Mezzacappa, A.; Marronetti, P .; Landfield, R.E.; Lentz, E.J.; Yakunin, K.N.; Bruenn, S.W.; Hix, W.R.; Messer, O.E.B.; Endeve, E.; Blondin, J.M.; et al. Gravitational-wave signal of a core-collapse supernova explosion of a 15 M ⊙ star. Phys. Rev. D 2020, 102, 023027. https://d...

2020 doi
[131]

The collapse and three-dimensional explosion of three-dimensional massive-star supernova progenitor models

Vartanyan, D.; Coleman, M.S.B.; Burrows, A. The collapse and three-dimensional explosion of three-dimensional massive-star supernova progenitor models. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2021, 510, 4689–4705. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab3702

2021 doi
[132]

Core-collapse Supernova Simulations and the Formation of Neutron Stars, Hybrid Stars, and Black Holes

Kuroda, T.; Fischer, T.; Takiwaki, T.; Kotake, K. Core-collapse Supernova Simulations and the Formation of Neutron Stars, Hybrid Stars, and Black Holes. Astrophys. J. 2022, 924, 38. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac31a8

2022 doi
[133]

Comparison of the Core-collapse Evolution of Two Nearly Equal-mass Progenitors

Bruenn, S.W.; Sieverding, A.; Lentz, E.J.; Sukhbold, T.; Hix, W.R.; Huk, L.N.; Harris, J.A.; Messer, O.E.B.; Mezzacappa, A. Comparison of the Core-collapse Evolution of Two Nearly Equal-mass Progenitors. Astrophys. J. 2023, 947, 35. https: //doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acbb65

2023 doi
[134]

A new subclass of type II supernovae ? Mon

Schlegel, E.M. A new subclass of type II supernovae ? Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 1990, 244, 269–271

1990
[135]

Optical Spectra of Supernovae

Filippenko, A.V . Optical Spectra of Supernovae. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 1997, 35, 309–355. https://doi.org/10.1146/ annurev.astro.35.1.309

1997
[136]

Interacting Supernovae: Types IIn and Ibn

Smith, N. Interacting Supernovae: Types IIn and Ibn. In Handbook of Supernovae ; Alsabti, A.W., Murdin, P ., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2017; p. 403. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21846-5_38

2017 doi
[137]

The Extremes of Thermonuclear Supernovae

Taubenberger, S. The Extremes of Thermonuclear Supernovae. In Handbook of Supernovae; Alsabti, A.W.; Murdin, P ., Eds.; Springer International Publishing AG: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2017; p. 317. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21846-5_37. Galaxies 2025, 1, 0 45 of 60

2017 doi
[138]

The Spectral SN-GRB Connection: Systematic Spectral Comparisons between Type Ic Supernovae and Broad-lined Type Ic Supernovae with and without Gamma-Ray Bursts

Modjaz, M.; Liu, Y.Q.; Bianco, F.B.; Graur, O. The Spectral SN-GRB Connection: Systematic Spectral Comparisons between Type Ic Supernovae and Broad-lined Type Ic Supernovae with and without Gamma-Ray Bursts. Astrophys. J. 2016, 832, 108. https://doi.org/10.3847/0004-637X/832/2/108

2016 doi
[139]

Analysis of broad-lined Type Ic supernovae from the (intermediate) Palomar Transient Factory

Taddia, F.; Sollerman, J.; Fremling, C.; Barbarino, C.; Karamehmetoglu, E.; Arcavi, I.; Cenko, S.B.; Filippenko, A.V .; Gal-Yam, A.; Hiramatsu, D.; et al. Analysis of broad-lined Type Ic supernovae from the (intermediate) Palomar Transient Factory. Astron. Astrophys. 2019, 621...

2019 doi
[140]

The Peculiar Type IC Supernova 1997EF: Another Hypernova

Iwamoto, K.; Nakamura, T.; Nomoto, K.; Mazzali, P .A.; Danziger, I.J.; Garnavich, P .; Kirshner, R.; Jha, S.; Balam, D.; Thorstensen, J. The Peculiar Type IC Supernova 1997EF: Another Hypernova. Astrophys. J. 2000, 534, 660–669. https://doi.org/10.1086/308761

doi
[141]

A physically motivated classification of stripped-envelope supernovae

Prentice, S.J.; Mazzali, P .A. A physically motivated classification of stripped-envelope supernovae. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2017, 469, 2672–2694. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx980

2017 doi
[142]

On the origin of short GRBs with extended emission and long GRBs without associated SN

van Putten, M.H.P .M.; Lee, G.M.; Della Valle, M.; Amati, L.; Levinson, A. On the origin of short GRBs with extended emission and long GRBs without associated SN. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2014, 444, L58–L62. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnrasl/slu113

2014 doi
[143]

Core-collapse, superluminous, and gamma-ray burst supernova host galaxy populations at low redshift: The importance of dwarf and starbursting galaxies

Taggart, K.; Perley, D.A. Core-collapse, superluminous, and gamma-ray burst supernova host galaxy populations at low redshift: The importance of dwarf and starbursting galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2021, 503, 3931–3952. https://doi.org/10.1093/ mnras/stab174

2021
[144]

A Comparative Study of the Absolute Magnitude Distributions of Supernovae

Richardson, D.; Branch, D.; Casebeer, D.; Millard, J.; Thomas, R.C.; Baron, E. A Comparative Study of the Absolute Magnitude Distributions of Supernovae. Astron. J. 2002, 123, 745–752. https://doi.org/10.1086/338318

2002 doi
[145]

Luminous Supernovae

Gal-Yam, A. Luminous Supernovae. Science 2012, 337, 927. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1203601

2012 doi
[146]

Superluminous Supernovae

Howell, D.A. Superluminous Supernovae. In Handbook of Supernovae ; Alsabti, A.W.; Murdin, P ., Eds.; Springer International Publishing AG: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2017; p. 431. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21846-5_41

2017 doi
[147]

The Most Luminous Supernovae

Gal-Yam, A. The Most Luminous Supernovae. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 2019, 57, 305–333. https://doi.org/10.1146/ annurev-astro-081817-051819

2019
[148]

Spectrum formation in superluminous supernovae (Type I).Mon

Mazzali, P .A.; Sullivan, M.; Pian, E.; Greiner, J.; Kann, D.A. Spectrum formation in superluminous supernovae (Type I).Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2016, 458, 3455–3465. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw512

2016 doi
[149]

Spectra of Hydrogen-poor Superluminous Supernovae from the Palomar Transient Factory

Quimby, R.M.; De Cia, A.; Gal-Yam, A.; Leloudas, G.; Lunnan, R.; Perley, D.A.; Vreeswijk, P .M.; Yan, L.; Bloom, J.S.; Cenko, S.B.; et al. Spectra of Hydrogen-poor Superluminous Supernovae from the Palomar Transient Factory. Astrophys. J. 2018, 855, 2. https://doi.org/10.3847/...

2018 doi
[150]

Premaximum Spectroscopic Diversity of Hydrogen-poor Superluminous Supernovae

Könyves-Tóth, R. Premaximum Spectroscopic Diversity of Hydrogen-poor Superluminous Supernovae. Astrophys. J. 2022, 940, 69. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac9903

2022 doi
[151]

An extremely luminous X-ray outburst at the birth of a supernova

Soderberg, A.M.; Berger, E.; Page, K.L.; Schady, P .; Parrent, J.; Pooley, D.; Wang, X.Y.; Ofek, E.O.; Cucchiara, A.; Rau, A.; et al. An extremely luminous X-ray outburst at the birth of a supernova. Nature 2008, 453, 469–474. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06997

2008 doi
[152]

SN 2020wnt: A slow-evolving carbon-rich superluminous supernova with no O II lines and a bumpy light curve

Gutiérrez, C.P .; Pastorello, A.; Bersten, M.; Benetti, S.; Orellana, M.; Fiore, A.; Karamehmetoglu, E.; Kravtsov, T.; Reguitti, A.; Reynolds, T.M.; et al. SN 2020wnt: A slow-evolving carbon-rich superluminous supernova with no O II lines and a bumpy light curve. Mon. Not. R. ...

2022 doi
[153]

Transitional events in the spectrophotometric regime between stripped envelope and superluminous su- pernovae

Prentice, S.J.; Inserra, C.; Schulze, S.; Nicholl, M.; Mazzali, P .A.; Vergani, S.D.; Galbany, L.; Anderson, J.P .; Ashall, C.; Chen, T.W.; et al. Transitional events in the spectrophotometric regime between stripped envelope and superluminous su- pernovae. Mon. Not. R. Astron...

2021 doi
[154]

Luminous Supernovae: Unveiling a Population between Superluminous and Normal Core-collapse Supernovae

Gomez, S.; Berger, E.; Nicholl, M.; Blanchard, P .K.; Hosseinzadeh, G. Luminous Supernovae: Unveiling a Population between Superluminous and Normal Core-collapse Supernovae. Astrophys. J. 2022, 941, 107. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac9842

2022 doi
[155]

Ultra-bright Optical Transients are Linked with Type Ic Supernovae

Pastorello, A.; Smartt, S.J.; Botticella, M.T.; Maguire, K.; Fraser, M.; Smith, K.; Kotak, R.; Magill, L.; Valenti, S.; Young, D.R.; et al. Ultra-bright Optical Transients are Linked with Type Ic Supernovae. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2010, 724, L16–L21. https://doi.org/10.1 088/2041...

2010
[156]

Observational properties of extreme supernovae

Inserra, C. Observational properties of extreme supernovae. Nat. Astron. 2019, 3, 697–705. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-019-0 854-4

2019 doi
[157]

On the diversity of superluminous supernovae: Ejected mass as the dominant factor

Nicholl, M.; Smartt, S.J.; Jerkstrand, A.; Inserra, C.; Sim, S.A.; Chen, T.W.; Benetti, S.; Fraser, M.; Gal-Yam, A.; Kankare, E.; et al. On the diversity of superluminous supernovae: Ejected mass as the dominant factor. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2015, 452, 3869–3893. https://d...

2015 doi
[158]

Light Curves of Hydrogen-poor Superluminous Supernovae from the Palomar Transient Factory

De Cia, A.; Gal-Yam, A.; Rubin, A.; Leloudas, G.; Vreeswijk, P .; Perley, D.A.; Quimby, R.; Yan, L.; Sullivan, M.; Flörs, A.; et al. Light Curves of Hydrogen-poor Superluminous Supernovae from the Palomar Transient Factory. Astrophys. J. 2018, 860, 100. https://doi.org/10.3847...

2018 doi
[159]

Hydrogen-poor Superluminous Supernovae from the Pan-STARRS1 Medium Deep Survey

Lunnan, R.; Chornock, R.; Berger, E.; Jones, D.O.; Rest, A.; Czekala, I.; Dittmann, J.; Drout, M.R.; Foley, R.J.; Fong, W.; et al. Hydrogen-poor Superluminous Supernovae from the Pan-STARRS1 Medium Deep Survey. Astrophys. J. 2018, 852, 81. https: //doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa...

2018 doi
[160]

Superluminous supernovae from the Dark Energy Survey

Angus, C.R.; Smith, M.; Sullivan, M.; Inserra, C.; Wiseman, P .; D’Andrea, C.B.; Thomas, B.P .; Nichol, R.C.; Galbany, L.; Childress, M.; et al. Superluminous supernovae from the Dark Energy Survey. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2019, 487, 2215–2241. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz1321

2019 doi
[161]

Gaia16apd—A link between fast and slowly declining type I superluminous supernovae

Kangas, T.; Blagorodnova, N.; Mattila, S.; Lundqvist, P .; Fraser, M.; Burgaz, U.; Cappellaro, E.; Carrasco Martínez, J.M.; Elias-Rosa, N.; Hardy, L.K.; et al. Gaia16apd—A link between fast and slowly declining type I superluminous supernovae. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2017, 4...

2017 doi
[162]

SN 2017gci: A nearby Type I Superluminous Supernova with a bumpy tail

Fiore, A.; Chen, T.W.; Jerkstrand, A.; Benetti, S.; Ciolfi, R.; Inserra, C.; Cappellaro, E.; Pastorello, A.; Leloudas, G.;Schulze, S.; et al. SN 2017gci: A nearby Type I Superluminous Supernova with a bumpy tail. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2021, 502, 2120–2139. https://doi.org/...

2021 doi
[163]

Detection of Broad Hα Emission Lines in the Late-time Spectra of a Hydrogen-poor Superluminous Supernova

Yan, L.; Quimby, R.; Ofek, E.; Gal-Yam, A.; Mazzali, P .; Perley, D.; Vreeswijk, P .M.; Leloudas, G.; De Cia, A.; Masci, F.; et al. Detection of Broad Hα Emission Lines in the Late-time Spectra of a Hydrogen-poor Superluminous Supernova. Astrophys. J. 2015, 814, 108. https://d...

2015 doi
[164]

Hydrogen-poor Superluminous Supernovae with Late-time Hα Emission: Three Events from the Intermediate Palomar Transient Factory

Yan, L.; Lunnan, R.; Perley, D.A.; Gal-Yam, A.; Yaron, O.; Roy, R.; Quimby, R.; Sollerman, J.; Fremling, C.; Leloudas, G.; et al. Hydrogen-poor Superluminous Supernovae with Late-time Hα Emission: Three Events from the Intermediate Palomar Transient Factory. Astrophys. J. 2017...

2017 doi
[165]

SN 2018bsz: A Type I superluminous supernova with aspherical circumstellar material

Pursiainen, M.; Leloudas, G.; Paraskeva, E.; Cikota, A.; Anderson, J.P .; Angus, C.R.; Brennan, S.; Bulla, M.; Camacho-Iñiguez, E.; Charalampopoulos, P .; et al. SN 2018bsz: A Type I superluminous supernova with aspherical circumstellar material. Astron. Astrophys. 2022, 666, ...

2022 doi
[166]

SN 2020qlb: A hydrogen-poor superluminous supernova with well-characterized light curve undulations

West, S.L.; Lunnan, R.; Omand, C.M.B.; Kangas, T.; Schulze, S.; Strotjohann, N.L.; Yang, S.; Fransson, C.; Sollerman, J.; Perley, D.; et al. SN 2020qlb: A hydrogen-poor superluminous supernova with well-characterized light curve undulations. Astron. Astrophys. 2023, 670, A7. h...

2023 doi
[167]

SN 2017egm: A Helium-rich Superluminous Supernova with Multiple Bumps in the Light Curves

Zhu, J.; Jiang, N.; Dong, S.; Filippenko, A.V .; Rudy, R.J.; Pastorello, A.; Ashall, C.; Bose, S.; Post, R.S.; Bersier, D.; et al. SN 2017egm: A Helium-rich Superluminous Supernova with Multiple Bumps in the Light Curves. Astrophys. J. 2023, 949, 23. https://doi.org/10.3847/15...

2023 doi
[168]

Bumpy Superluminous Supernovae Powered by a Magnetar–Star Binary Engine

Zhu, J.P .; Liu, L.D.; Yu, Y.W.; Mandel, I.; Hirai, R.; Zhang, B.; Chen, A. Bumpy Superluminous Supernovae Powered by a Magnetar–Star Binary Engine. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2024, 970, L42. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ad63a8

2024 doi
[169]

Super-luminous Type Ic Supernovae: Catching a Magnetar by the Tail

Inserra, C.; Smartt, S.J.; Jerkstrand, A.; Valenti, S.; Fraser, M.; Wright, D.; Smith, K.; Chen, T.W.; Kotak, R.; Pastorello, A.; et al. Super-luminous Type Ic Supernovae: Catching a Magnetar by the Tail. Astrophys. J. 2013, 770, 128. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004 -637X/770/2/128

2013 doi
[170]

The Properties of NI CO Fe Decay

Nadyozhin, D.K. The Properties of NI CO Fe Decay. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 1994, 92, 527. https://doi.org/10.1086/192008

1994 doi
[171]

Theoretical Astrophysics—Volume 2, Stars and Stellar Systems ; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2001; Volume 2

Padmanabhan, T. Theoretical Astrophysics—Volume 2, Stars and Stellar Systems ; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2001; Volume 2. https://doi.org/10.2277/0521562414

2001 doi
[172]

A meta-analysis of core-collapse supernova56Ni masses

Anderson, J.P . A meta-analysis of core-collapse supernova56Ni masses. Astron. Astrophys. 2019, 628, A7. https://doi.org/10.105 1/0004-6361/201935027

2019
[173]

Progenitor-explosion Connection and Remnant Birth Masses for Neutrino-driven Supernovae of Iron-core Progenitors

Ugliano, M.; Janka, H.T.; Marek, A.; Arcones, A. Progenitor-explosion Connection and Remnant Birth Masses for Neutrino-driven Supernovae of Iron-core Progenitors. Astrophys. J. 2012, 757, 69. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/757/1/69

2012 doi
[174]

The Nucleosynthetic Signature of Population III

Heger, A.; Woosley, S.E. The Nucleosynthetic Signature of Population III. Astrophys. J. 2002, 567, 532–543. https://doi.org/10.1 086/338487

2002
[175]

Slowly fading super-luminous supernovae that are not pair-instability explosions

Nicholl, M.; Smartt, S.J.; Jerkstrand, A.; Inserra, C.; McCrum, M.; Kotak, R.; Fraser, M.; Wright, D.; Chen, T.W.;Smith, K.; et al. Slowly fading super-luminous supernovae that are not pair-instability explosions. Nature 2013, 502, 346–349. https://doi.org/10 .1038/nature12569

2013
[176]

Can pair-instability supernova models match the observations of superluminous supernovae? Mon

Kozyreva, A.; Blinnikov, S. Can pair-instability supernova models match the observations of superluminous supernovae? Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2015, 454, 4357–4365. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv2287

2015 doi
[177]

The nature of PISN candidates: Clues from nebular spectra.Mon

Mazzali, P .A.; Moriya, T.J.; Tanaka, M.; Woosley, S.E. The nature of PISN candidates: Clues from nebular spectra.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2019, 484, 3451–3462. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz177

2019 doi
[178]

Synthetic spectra of energetic core-collapse supernovae and the early spectra of SN 2007bi and SN 1999as

Moriya, T.J.; Mazzali, P .A.; Tanaka, M. Synthetic spectra of energetic core-collapse supernovae and the early spectra of SN 2007bi and SN 1999as. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2019, 484, 3443–3450. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz262

2019 doi
[179]

Radiative properties of pair-instability supernova explosions

Dessart, L.; Waldman, R.; Livne, E.; Hillier, D.J.; Blondin, S. Radiative properties of pair-instability supernova explosions. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2013, 428, 3227–3251. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sts269

2013 doi
[180]

Nebular spectra of pair-instability supernovae

Jerkstrand, A.; Smartt, S.J.; Heger, A. Nebular spectra of pair-instability supernovae. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2016, 455, 3207–3229. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv2369

2016 doi
[181]

Supernova Interaction with a Circumstellar Medium

Chevalier, R.A.; Fransson, C. Supernova Interaction with a Circumstellar Medium. In Supernovae and Gamma-Ray Bursters ; Weiler, K., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2003; Volume 598, pp. 171–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45863-8_10

2003 doi
[182]

Shock Breakout in Dense Mass Loss: Luminous Supernovae

Chevalier, R.A.; Irwin, C.M. Shock Breakout in Dense Mass Loss: Luminous Supernovae. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2011, 729, L6. https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/729/1/L6. Galaxies 2025, 1, 0 47 of 60

2011 doi
[183]

Generalized Semi-analytical Models of Supernova Light Curves

Chatzopoulos, E.; Wheeler, J.C.; Vinko, J. Generalized Semi-analytical Models of Supernova Light Curves. Astrophys. J. 2012, 746, 121. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/746/2/121

2012 doi
[184]

Superluminous Light Curves from Supernovae Exploding in a Dense Wind

Ginzburg, S.; Balberg, S. Superluminous Light Curves from Supernovae Exploding in a Dense Wind. Astrophys. J. 2012, 757, 178. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/757/2/178

2012 doi
[185]

Superluminous supernovae from PESSTO

Nicholl, M.; Smartt, S.J.; Jerkstrand, A.; Inserra, C.; Anderson, J.P .; Baltay, C.; Benetti, S.; Chen, T.W.; Elias-Rosa, N.;Feindt, U.; et al. Superluminous supernovae from PESSTO. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2014, 444, 2096–2113. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu1 579

2014 doi
[186]

The host galaxy and late-time evolution of the superluminous supernova PTF12dam

Chen, T.W.; Smartt, S.J.; Jerkstrand, A.; Nicholl, M.; Bresolin, F.; Kotak, R.; Polshaw, J.; Rest, A.; Kudritzki, R.; Zheng, Z.; et al. The host galaxy and late-time evolution of the superluminous supernova PTF12dam. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2015, 452, 1567–1586. https://doi....

2015 doi
[187]

Supernova Light Curves Powered by Fallback Accretion

Dexter, J.; Kasen, D. Supernova Light Curves Powered by Fallback Accretion. Astrophys. J. 2013, 772, 30. https://doi.org/10.108 8/0004-637X/772/1/30

2013
[188]

Magnetar-driven Shock Breakout and Double-peaked Supernova Light Curves

Kasen, D.; Metzger, B.D.; Bildsten, L. Magnetar-driven Shock Breakout and Double-peaked Supernova Light Curves. Astrophys. J. 2016, 821, 36. https://doi.org/10.3847/0004-637X/821/1/36

2016 doi
[189]

Systematic Investigation of the Fallback Accretion-powered Model for Hydrogen-poor Superluminous Supernovae

Moriya, T.J.; Nicholl, M.; Guillochon, J. Systematic Investigation of the Fallback Accretion-powered Model for Hydrogen-poor Superluminous Supernovae. Astrophys. J. 2018, 867, 113. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aae53d

2018 doi
[190]

Testing the magnetar scenario for superluminous supernovae with circular polarimetry

Cikota, A.; Leloudas, G.; Bulla, M.; Inserra, C.; Chen, T.W.; Spyromilio, J.; Patat, F.; Cano, Z.; Cikota, S.; Coughlin, M.W.; et al. Testing the magnetar scenario for superluminous supernovae with circular polarimetry. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2018, 479, 4984–4990. https://d...

2018 doi
[191]

Early optical imaging polarimetry of type I superluminous supernova 2020ank

Lee, C.H. Early optical imaging polarimetry of type I superluminous supernova 2020ank. Astron. Nachrichten 2020, 341, 651–655. https://doi.org/10.1002/asna.202013805

2020 doi
[192]

Post maximum light and late time optical imaging polarimetry of type I superluminous supernova 2020znr

Poidevin, F.; Omand, C.M.B.; Pérez-Fournon, I.; Clavero, R.; Shirley, R.; Marques-Chaves, R.; Jimenez Angel, C.; Geier, S. Post maximum light and late time optical imaging polarimetry of type I superluminous supernova 2020znr. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2022, 511, 5948–5963. ht...

2022 doi
[193]

Polarimetry of hydrogen-poor superluminous supernovae

Pursiainen, M.; Leloudas, G.; Cikota, A.; Bulla, M.; Inserra, C.; Patat, F.; Wheeler, J.C.; Aamer, A.; Gal-Yam, A.; Maund, J.; et al. Polarimetry of hydrogen-poor superluminous supernovae. Astron. Astrophys. 2023, 674, A81. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-636 1/202345945

2023 doi
[194]

Close, bright, and boxy: The superluminous SN 2018hti

Fiore, A.; Benetti, S.; Nicholl, M.; Reguitti, A.; Cappellaro, E.; Campana, S.; Bose, S.; Paraskeva, E.; Berger, E.;Bravo, T.M.; et al. Close, bright, and boxy: The superluminous SN 2018hti. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2022, 512, 4484–4502. https://doi.org/10.1093/ mnras/stac744

2022
[195]

Fermi-LAT discovery of the GeV emission of the superluminous supernovae SN 2017egm

Li, S.; Liang, Y.F.; Liao, N.H.; Lei, L.; Fan, Y.Z. Fermi-LAT discovery of the GeV emission of the superluminous supernovae SN 2017egm. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2407.05968. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2407.05968

2024 doi arXiv
[196]

Pulsational pair instability as an explanation for the most luminous supernovae

Woosley, S.E.; Blinnikov, S.; Heger, A. Pulsational pair instability as an explanation for the most luminous supernovae. Nature 2007, 450, 390–392. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06333

2007 doi
[197]

Pulsational Pair-instability Supernovae

Woosley, S.E. Pulsational Pair-instability Supernovae. Astrophys. J. 2017, 836, 244. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/836/2/244

2017 doi
[198]

Predictions for the hydrogen- free ejecta of pulsational pair-instability supernovae

Renzo, M.; Farmer, R.; Justham, S.; Götberg, Y.; de Mink, S.E.; Zapartas, E.; Marchant, P .; Smith, N. Predictions for the hydrogen- free ejecta of pulsational pair-instability supernovae. Astron. Astrophys. 2020, 640, A56. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/2020 37710

2020 doi
[199]

Strong late-time circumstellar interaction in the peculiar supernova iPTF14hls

Andrews, J.E.; Smith, N. Strong late-time circumstellar interaction in the peculiar supernova iPTF14hls. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2018, 477, 74–79. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty584

2018 doi
[200]

A Numerical Example of the Collapse of a Rotating Magnetized Star

LeBlanc, J.M.; Wilson, J.R. A Numerical Example of the Collapse of a Rotating Magnetized Star. Astrophys. J. 1970, 161, 541. https://doi.org/10.1086/150558

1970 doi
[201]

The Magnetohydrodynamic Rotational Model of Supernova Explosion

Bisnovatyi-Kogan, G.S.; Popov, I.P .; Samokhin, A.A. The Magnetohydrodynamic Rotational Model of Supernova Explosion. Astrophys. Space Sci. 1976, 41, 287–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00646184

1976 doi
[202]

Magnetohydrodynamic phenomena in collapsing stellar cores

Meier, D.L.; Epstein, R.I.; Arnett, W.D.; Schramm, D.N. Magnetohydrodynamic phenomena in collapsing stellar cores. Astrophys. J. 1976, 204, 869–878. https://doi.org/10.1086/154235

1976 doi
[203]

A magnetohydrodynamical supernova model

Mueller, E.; Hillebrandt, W. A magnetohydrodynamical supernova model. Astron. Astrophys. 1979, 80, 147–154

1979
[204]

Magnetorotational supernovae: A nucleosynthetic analysis of sophisticated 3D models

Reichert, M.; Obergaulinger, M.; Aloy, M.Á.; Gabler, M.; Arcones, A.; Thielemann, F.K. Magnetorotational supernovae: A nucleosynthetic analysis of sophisticated 3D models. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2023, 518, 1557–1583. https://doi.org/10.1093/ mnras/stac3185

2023
[205]

Superluminous Supernovae as Standardizable Candles and High-redshift Distance Probes

Inserra, C.; Smartt, S.J. Superluminous Supernovae as Standardizable Candles and High-redshift Distance Probes. Astrophys. J. 2014, 796, 87. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/796/2/87

2014 doi
[206]

Testing Cosmological Models with Type Ic Super Luminous Supernovae.Astron

Wei, J.J.; Wu, X.F.; Melia, F. Testing Cosmological Models with Type Ic Super Luminous Supernovae.Astron. J. 2015, 149, 165. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-6256/149/5/165. Galaxies 2025, 1, 0 48 of 60

2015 doi
[207]

The first Hubble diagram and cosmological constraints using superluminous supernovae

Inserra, C.; Sullivan, M.; Angus, C.R.; Macaulay, E.; Nichol, R.C.; Smith, M.; Frohmaier, C.; Gutiérrez, C.P .; Vicenzi, M.; Möller, A.; et al. The first Hubble diagram and cosmological constraints using superluminous supernovae. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2021, 504, 2535–2549....

2021 doi
[208]

The rest-frame ultraviolet of superluminous supernovae—I

Khetan, N.; Cooke, J.; Branchesi, M. The rest-frame ultraviolet of superluminous supernovae—I. Potential as cosmological probes. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2023, 521, 2814–2832. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad661

2023 doi
[209]

The Soft Gamma Repeaters as Very Strongly Magnetized Neutron Stars

Thompson, C.; Duncan, R.C. The Soft Gamma Repeaters as Very Strongly Magnetized Neutron Stars. II. Quiescent Neutrino, X-Ray, and Alfven Wave Emission. Astrophys. J. 1996, 473, 322. https://doi.org/10.1086/178147

1996 doi
[210]

An ultraluminous X-ray source powered by an accreting neutron star

Bachetti, M.; Harrison, F.A.; Walton, D.J.; Grefenstette, B.W.; Chakrabarty, D.; Fürst, F.; Barret, D.; Beloborodov, A.; Boggs, S.E.; Christensen, F.E.; et al. An ultraluminous X-ray source powered by an accreting neutron star. Nature 2014, 514, 202–204. https://doi.org/10.103...

2014 doi
[211]

A fast radio burst associated with a Galactic magnetar

Bochenek, C.D.; Ravi, V .; Belov, K.V .; Hallinan, G.; Kocz, J.; Kulkarni, S.R.; McKenna, D.L. A fast radio burst associated with a Galactic magnetar. Nature 2020, 587, 59–62. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2872-x

2020 doi
[212]

A survey of magnetic Ap/Bp stars for weak longitudinal magnetic fields

Auriere, M.; Silvester, J.; Wade, G.A.; Bagnulo, S.; Donati, J.F.; Johnson, N.; Landstreet, J.D.; Ligneres, F.; Lueftinger, T.; Mouillet, D.; et al. A survey of magnetic Ap/Bp stars for weak longitudinal magnetic fields. A-Peculiar Newsl. 2003, 39

2003
[213]

Magnetized massive stars as magnetar progenitors

Hu, R.Y.; Lou, Y.Q. Magnetized massive stars as magnetar progenitors. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2009, 396, 878–886. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14648.x

2009
[214]

A fossil origin for the magnetic field in A stars and white dwarfs

Braithwaite, J.; Spruit, H.C. A fossil origin for the magnetic field in A stars and white dwarfs. Nature 2004, 431, 819–821. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02934

2004 doi
[215]

Formation of Very Strongly Magnetized Neutron Stars: Implications for Gamma-Ray Bursts

Duncan, R.C.; Thompson, C. Formation of Very Strongly Magnetized Neutron Stars: Implications for Gamma-Ray Bursts. Astrophys. J. Lett. 1992, 392, L9. https://doi.org/10.1086/186413

1992 doi
[216]

The Collapse of Rotating Massive Stars in Three Dimensions

Fryer, C.L.; Warren, M.S. The Collapse of Rotating Massive Stars in Three Dimensions. Astrophys. J. 2004, 601, 391. https: //doi.org/10.1086/380193

2004 doi
[217]

Two-dimensional hydrodynamic core-collapse supernova simulations with spectral neutrino transport: I

Buras, R.; Rampp, M.; Janka, H.T.; Kifonidis, K. Two-dimensional hydrodynamic core-collapse supernova simulations with spectral neutrino transport: I. Numerical method and results for a 15 M ⊙ star. Astron. Astrophys. 2006, 447, 1049–1092. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20053783

2006 doi
[218]

On the Nature of Pulsars

Ostriker, J.P .; Gunn, J.E. On the Nature of Pulsars. I. Theory. Astrophys. J. 1969, 157, 1395. https://doi.org/10.1086/150160

1969 doi
[219]

Supernova Light Curves Powered by Young Magnetars

Kasen, D.; Bildsten, L. Supernova Light Curves Powered by Young Magnetars. Astrophys. J. 2010, 717, 245–249. https: //doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/717/1/245

2010 doi
[220]

Long γ-ray bursts and core-collapse supernovae have different environments

Fruchter, A.S.; Levan, A.J.; Strolger, L.; Vreeswijk, P .M.; Thorsett, S.E.; Bersier, D.; Burud, I.; Castro Cerón, J.M.; Castro-Tirado, A.J.; Conselice, C.; et al. Long γ-ray bursts and core-collapse supernovae have different environments. Nature 2006, 441, 463–468. https://do...

2006 doi
[221]

Measured Metallicities at the Sites of Nearby Broad-Lined Type Ic Supernovae and Implications for the Supernovae Gamma-Ray Burst Connection

Modjaz, M.; Kewley, L.; Kirshner, R.P .; Stanek, K.Z.; Challis, P .; Garnavich, P .M.; Greene, J.E.; Kelly, P .L.; Prieto, J.L. Measured Metallicities at the Sites of Nearby Broad-Lined Type Ic Supernovae and Implications for the Supernovae Gamma-Ray Burst Connection. Astron. ...

2008 doi
[222]

Merging binary black holes formed through chemically homogeneous evolution in short-period stellar binaries

Mandel, I.; de Mink, S.E. Merging binary black holes formed through chemically homogeneous evolution in short-period stellar binaries. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2016, 458, 2634–2647. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw379

2016 doi
[223]

Wolf-Rayet spin at low metallicity and its implication for black hole formation channels

Vink, J.S.; Harries, T.J. Wolf-Rayet spin at low metallicity and its implication for black hole formation channels. Astron. Astrophys. 2017, 603, A120. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201730503

2017 doi
[224]

Binary black holes in young star clusters: The impact of metallicity

Di Carlo, U.N.; Mapelli, M.; Giacobbo, N.; Spera, M.; Bouffanais, Y.; Rastello, S.; Santoliquido, F.; Pasquato, M.; Ballone, A.; Trani, A.A.; et al. Binary black holes in young star clusters: The impact of metallicity. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2020, 498, 495–506. https://doi....

2020 doi
[225]

Evolution of rapidly rotating metal-poor massive stars towards gamma-ray bursts

Yoon, S.C.; Langer, N. Evolution of rapidly rotating metal-poor massive stars towards gamma-ray bursts. Astron. Astrophys. 2005, 443, 643–648. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20054030

2005 doi
[226]

Stellar core-merger-induced collapse: New formation pathways for black holes, Thorne– ˙Zytkow objects, magnetars, and superluminous supernovae

Ablimit, I.; Podsiadlowski, P .; Hirai, R.; Wicker, J. Stellar core-merger-induced collapse: New formation pathways for black holes, Thorne– ˙Zytkow objects, magnetars, and superluminous supernovae. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2022, 513, 4802–4813. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac631

2022 doi
[227]

Preferential Occurrence of Fast Radio Bursts in Massive Star-Forming Galaxies

Sharma, K.; Ravi, V .; Connor, L.; Law, C.; Ocker, S.K.; Sherman, M.; Kosogorov, N.; Faber, J.; Hallinan, G.; Harnach, C.; et al. Preferential Occurrence of Fast Radio Bursts in Massive Star-Forming Galaxies. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2409.16964

2024 arXiv
[228]

Long-duration Gamma-Ray Burst Progenitors and Magnetar Formation

Song, C.Y.; Liu, T. Long-duration Gamma-Ray Burst Progenitors and Magnetar Formation. Astrophys. J. 2023, 952, 156. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acd6ee

2023 doi
[229]

Do Pulsars Make Supernovae? 11

Bodenheimer, P .; Ostriker, J.P . Do Pulsars Make Supernovae? 11. Calculations of Light Curves for Type 11 Events.Astrophys. J. 1974, 191, 465–472. https://doi.org/10.1086/152985

1974 doi
[230]

Do Pulsars Make Supernovae? Astrophys

Ostriker, J.P .; Gunn, J.E. Do Pulsars Make Supernovae? Astrophys. J. Lett. 1971, 164, L95. https://doi.org/10.1086/180699

1971 doi
[231]

Pulsar theory of supernova light curves

Gaffet, B. Pulsar theory of supernova light curves. I. Dynamical effect and thermalization of the pulsar strong waves. Astrophys. J. 1977, 216, 565–577. https://doi.org/10.1086/155498. Galaxies 2025, 1, 0 49 of 60

1977 doi
[232]

Pulsar theory of supernova light curves

Gaffet, B. Pulsar theory of supernova light curves. II. The light curve and the continuum spectrum.Astrophys. J. 1977, 216, 852–864. https://doi.org/10.1086/155530

1977 doi
[233]

SN 2005bf: A Possible Transition Event between Type Ib/c Supernovae and Gamma-Ray Bursts

Folatelli, G.; Contreras, C.; Phillips, M.M.; Woosley, S.E.; Blinnikov, S.; Morrell, N.; Suntzeff, N.B.; Lee, B.L.; Hamuy, M.; González, S.; et al. SN 2005bf: A Possible Transition Event between Type Ib/c Supernovae and Gamma-Ray Bursts. Astrophys. J. 2006, 641, 1039–1050. htt...

2006 doi
[234]

The Unique Type Ib Supernova 2005bf at Nebular Phases: A Possible Birth Event of a Strongly Magnetized Neutron Star

Maeda, K.; Tanaka, M.; Nomoto, K.; Tominaga, N.; Kawabata, K.; Mazzali, P .A.; Umeda, H.; Suzuki, T.; Hattori, T. The Unique Type Ib Supernova 2005bf at Nebular Phases: A Possible Birth Event of a Strongly Magnetized Neutron Star. Astrophys. J. 2007, 666, 1069–1082. https://do...

2007 doi
[235]

A neutron-star- driven X-ray flash associated with supernova SN 2006aj

Mazzali, P .A.; Deng, J.; Nomoto, K.; Sauer, D.N.; Pian, E.; Tominaga, N.; Tanaka, M.; Maeda, K.; Filippenko, A.V . A neutron-star- driven X-ray flash associated with supernova SN 2006aj. Nature 2006, 442, 1018–1020. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05081

2006 doi
[236]

Analytical Light Curve Models of Superluminous Supernovae: χ2-minimization of Parameter Fits

Chatzopoulos, E.; Wheeler, J.C.; Vinko, J.; Horvath, Z.L.; Nagy, A. Analytical Light Curve Models of Superluminous Supernovae: χ2-minimization of Parameter Fits. Astrophys. J. 2013, 773, 76. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/773/1/76

2013 doi
[237]

The Magnetar Model for Type I Superluminous Supernovae

Nicholl, M.; Guillochon, J.; Berger, E. The Magnetar Model for Type I Superluminous Supernovae. I. Bayesian Analysis of the Full Multicolor Light-curve Sample with MOSFiT. Astrophys. J. 2017, 850, 55. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa9334

2017 doi
[238]

The GRB-SLSN connection: Misaligned magnetars, weak jet emergence, and observational signatures

Margalit, B.; Metzger, B.D.; Thompson, T.A.; Nicholl, M.; Sukhbold, T. The GRB-SLSN connection: Misaligned magnetars, weak jet emergence, and observational signatures. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2018, 475, 2659–2674. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty013

2018 doi
[239]

Magnetar-driven Shock Breakout Revisited and Implications for Double-peaked Type I Superluminous Supernovae

Liu, L.D.; Gao, H.; Wang, X.F.; Yang, S. Magnetar-driven Shock Breakout Revisited and Implications for Double-peaked Type I Superluminous Supernovae. Astrophys. J. 2021, 911, 142. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/abf042

2021 doi
[240]

Late Jets, Early Sparks: Illuminating the Pre-Maximum Bumps in Superluminous Supernovae

Gottlieb, O.; Metzger, B.D. Late Jets, Early Sparks: Illuminating the Pre-Maximum Bumps in Superluminous Supernovae. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2407.20348. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2407.20348

2024 doi arXiv
[241]

Superluminous supernovae: 56Ni power versus magnetar radiation

Dessart, L.; Hillier, D.J.; Waldman, R.; Livne, E.; Blondin, S. Superluminous supernovae: 56Ni power versus magnetar radiation. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2012, 426, L76–L80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3933.2012.01329.x

2012
[242]

Superluminous Supernova SN 2015bn in the Nebular Phase: Evidence for the Engine-powered Explosion of a Stripped Massive Star

Nicholl, M.; Berger, E.; Margutti, R.; Chornock, R.; Blanchard, P .K.; Jerkstrand, A.; Smartt, S.J.; Arcavi, I.; Challis, P .; Chambers, K.C.; et al. Superluminous Supernova SN 2015bn in the Nebular Phase: Evidence for the Engine-powered Explosion of a Stripped Massive Star. A...

2016 doi
[243]

Toward nebular spectral modeling of magnetar-powered supernovae

Omand, C.M.B.; Jerkstrand, A. Toward nebular spectral modeling of magnetar-powered supernovae. Astron. Astrophys. 2023, 673, A107. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202245406

2023 doi
[244]

Unveiling the engines of fast radio bursts, superluminous supernovae, and gamma-ray bursts

Margalit, B.; Metzger, B.D.; Berger, E.; Nicholl, M.; Eftekhari, T.; Margutti, R. Unveiling the engines of fast radio bursts, superluminous supernovae, and gamma-ray bursts. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2018, 481, 2407–2426. https://doi.org/10.1093/ mnras/sty2417

2018
[245]

The Swift Gamma-Ray Burst Mission

Gehrels, N.; Chincarini, G.; Giommi, P .; Mason, K.O.; Nousek, J.A.; Wells, A.A.; White, N.E.; Barthelmy, S.D.; Burrows, D.N.; Cominsky, L.R.; et al. The Swift Gamma-Ray Burst Mission. Astrophys. J. 2004, 611, 1005–1020. https://doi.org/10.1086/422091

2004 doi
[246]

Spectra and Light Curves of Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows

Sari, R.; Piran, T.; Narayan, R. Spectra and Light Curves of Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows. Astrophys. J. Lett. 1998, 497, L17–L20. https://doi.org/10.1086/311269

1998 doi
[247]

Can magnetar spin-down power extended emission in some short GRBs? Mon

Gompertz, B.P .; O’Brien, P .T.; Wynn, G.A.; Rowlinson, A. Can magnetar spin-down power extended emission in some short GRBs? Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2013, 431, 1745–1751. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt293

2013 doi
[248]

Evidence for a Canonical Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglow Light Curve in the Swift XRT Data

Nousek, J.A.; Kouveliotou, C.; Grupe, D.; Page, K.L.; Granot, J.; Ramirez-Ruiz, E.; Patel, S.K.; Burrows, D.N.; Mangano, V .; Barthelmy, S.; et al. Evidence for a Canonical Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglow Light Curve in the Swift XRT Data. Astrophys. J. 2006, 642, 389–400. https://d...

2006 doi
[249]

Gamma-Ray Bursts in the Swift Era

Gehrels, N.; Ramirez-Ruiz, E.; Fox, D.B. Gamma-Ray Bursts in the Swift Era. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 2009, 47, 567–617. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145147

2009
[250]

Thick Fireballs and the Steep Decay in the Early X-Ray Afterglow of Gamma-Ray Bursts

Lazzati, D.; Begelman, M.C. Thick Fireballs and the Steep Decay in the Early X-Ray Afterglow of Gamma-Ray Bursts. Astrophys. J. 2006, 641, 972–977. https://doi.org/10.1086/500502

2006 doi
[251]

A wind environment and Lorentz factors of tens explain gamma-ray bursts X-ray plateau

Dereli-Bégué, H.; Pe’er, A.; Ryde, F.; Oates, S.R.; Zhang, B.; Dainotti, M.G. A wind environment and Lorentz factors of tens explain gamma-ray bursts X-ray plateau. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 5611. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-32881-1

2022 doi
[252]

Robust features of off-axis gamma-ray burst afterglow light curves.Mon

Beniamini, P .; Gill, R.; Granot, J. Robust features of off-axis gamma-ray burst afterglow light curves.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2022, 515, 555–570. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac1821

2022 doi
[253]

The Central Engine of Gamma-Ray Bursters

Klu´ zniak, W.; Ruderman, M. The Central Engine of Gamma-Ray Bursters. Astrophys. J. Lett. 1998, 505, L113–L117. https: //doi.org/10.1086/311622

1998 doi
[254]

Asymmetric Supernovae, Pulsars, Magnetars, and Gamma-Ray Bursts.Astrophys

Wheeler, J.C.; Yi, I.; Höflich, P .; Wang, L. Asymmetric Supernovae, Pulsars, Magnetars, and Gamma-Ray Bursts.Astrophys. J. 2000, 537, 810–823. https://doi.org/10.1086/309055

doi
[255]

Gamma-ray burst afterglows and evolution of postburst fireballs with energy injection from strongly magnetic millisecond pulsars

Dai, Z.G.; Lu, T. Gamma-ray burst afterglows and evolution of postburst fireballs with energy injection from strongly magnetic millisecond pulsars. Astron. Astrophys. 1998, 333, L87–L90. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9810402

1998 doi arXiv
[256]

Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglow with Continuous Energy Injection: Signature of a Highly Magnetized Millisecond Pulsar

Zhang, B.; Mészáros, P . Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglow with Continuous Energy Injection: Signature of a Highly Magnetized Millisecond Pulsar. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2001, 552, L35–L38. https://doi.org/10.1086/320255. Galaxies 2025, 1, 0 50 of 60

2001 doi
[257]

Gamma-ray bursts afterglows with energy injection from a spinning down neutron star

Dall’Osso, S.; Stratta, G.; Guetta, D.; Covino, S.; De Cesare, G.; Stella, L. Gamma-ray bursts afterglows with energy injection from a spinning down neutron star. Astron. Astrophys. 2011, 526, A121. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201014168

2011 doi
[258]

Signatures of magnetar central engines in short GRB light curves

Rowlinson, A.; O’Brien, P .T.; Metzger, B.D.; Tanvir, N.R.; Levan, A.J. Signatures of magnetar central engines in short GRB light curves. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2013, 430, 1061–1087. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sts683

2013 doi
[259]

Constraining the Type of Central Engine of GRBs with Swift Data

Li, L.; Wu, X.F.; Lei, W.H.; Dai, Z.G.; Liang, E.W.; Ryde, F. Constraining the Type of Central Engine of GRBs with Swift Data. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 2018, 236, 26. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/aabaf3

2018 doi
[260]

On the Magnetar Origin of the GRBs Presenting X-Ray Afterglow Plateaus

Stratta, G.; Dainotti, M.G.; Dall’Osso, S.; Hernandez, X.; Cesare, G.D. On the Magnetar Origin of the GRBs Presenting X-Ray Afterglow Plateaus. Astrophys. J. 2018, 869, 155. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aadd8f

2018 doi
[261]

Statistical Study of Gamma-Ray Bursts with a Plateau Phase in the X-Ray Afterglow

Tang, C.H.; Huang, Y.F.; Geng, J.J.; Zhang, Z.B. Statistical Study of Gamma-Ray Bursts with a Plateau Phase in the X-Ray Afterglow. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 2019, 245, 1. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/ab4711

2019 doi
[262]

Combined X-ray and optical analysis to probe the origin of the plateau emission in γ-ray burst afterglows

Ronchini, S.; Stratta, G.; Rossi, A.; Kann, D.A.; Oganeysan, G.; Dall’Osso, S.; Branchesi, M.; Cesare, G.D. Combined X-ray and optical analysis to probe the origin of the plateau emission in γ-ray burst afterglows. Astron. Astrophys. 2023, 675, A117. https://doi.org/10.1051/00...

2023 doi
[263]

The X-ray light curve of gamma-ray bursts: Clues to the central engine

Bernardini, M.G.; Margutti, R.; Mao, J.; Zaninoni, E.; Chincarini, G. The X-ray light curve of gamma-ray bursts: Clues to the central engine. Astron. Astrophys. 2012, 539, A3. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201117895

2012 doi
[264]

Formation and evolution of binary and millisecond radio pulsars

Bhattacharya, D.; van den Heuvel, E.P .J. Formation and evolution of binary and millisecond radio pulsars. Phys. Rep. 1991, 203, 1–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-1573(91)90064-S

1991 doi
[265]

Binary Pulsars in Magnetic Field versus Spin Period Diagram.arXiv 2013, arXiv:1304.2489

Yuanyue, P .; Na, W.; Chengmin, Z. Binary Pulsars in Magnetic Field versus Spin Period Diagram.arXiv 2013, arXiv:1304.2489. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1304.2489

2013 doi arXiv
[266]

Why the Number of Galactic X-ray Stars Is so Small? Astron

Illarionov, A.F.; Sunyaev, R.A. Why the Number of Galactic X-ray Stars Is so Small? Astron. Astrophys. 1975, 39, 185

1975
[267]

Intermittent Stellar Wind Acceleration and the Long-Term Activity of Population I Binary Systems Containing an X-Ray Pulsar

Stella, L.; White, N.E.; Rosner, R. Intermittent Stellar Wind Acceleration and the Long-Term Activity of Population I Binary Systems Containing an X-Ray Pulsar. Astrophys. J. 1986, 308, 669. https://doi.org/10.1086/164538

1986 doi
[268]

How to Switch a Gamma-Ray Burst On and Off through a Magnetar

Bernardini, M.G.; Campana, S.; Ghisellini, G.; D’Avanzo, P .; Burlon, D.; Covino, S.; Ghirlanda, G.; Melandri, A.; Salvaterra, R.; Vergani, S.D.; et al. How to Switch a Gamma-Ray Burst On and Off through a Magnetar. Astrophys. J. 2013, 775, 67. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637...

2013 doi
[269]

Magnetar Central Engines in Gamma-Ray Bursts Follow the Universal Relation of Accreting Magnetic Stars

Dall’Osso, S.; Stratta, G.; Perna, R.; Cesare, G.D.; Stella, L. Magnetar Central Engines in Gamma-Ray Bursts Follow the Universal Relation of Accreting Magnetic Stars. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2023, 949, L32. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/acccec

2023 doi
[270]

A universal relation for the propeller mechanisms in magnetic rotating stars at different scales

Campana, S.; Stella, L.; Mereghetti, S.; de Martino, D. A universal relation for the propeller mechanisms in magnetic rotating stars at different scales. Astron. Astrophys. 2018, 610, A46. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201730769

2018 doi
[271]

The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory

Punturo, M.; Abernathy, M.; Acernese, F.; Allen, B.; Andersson, N.; Arun, K.; Barone, F.; Barr, B.; Barsuglia, M.;Beker, M.; et al. The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory. Class. Quantum Gravity 2010, 27, 194002. https: //doi.org/10.1088/0264...

2010 doi
[272]

The THESEUS space mission concept: Science case, design and expected performances

Amati, L.; O’Brien, P .; Götz, D.; Bozzo, E.; Tenzer, C.; Frontera, F.; Ghirlanda, G.; Labanti, C.; Osborne, J.P .; Stratta, G.; et al. The THESEUS space mission concept: Science case, design and expected performances. Adv. Space Res. 2018, 62, 191–244. https://doi.org/10.1016...

2018 doi
[273]

The Supernova Gamma-Ray Burst Connection

Woosley, S.E.; Bloom, J.S. The Supernova Gamma-Ray Burst Connection. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 2006, 44, 507–556. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.astro.43.072103.150558

2006 arXiv
[274]

The Gamma-Ray Burst—Supernova Connection

Hjorth, J.; Bloom, J.S. The Gamma-Ray Burst—Supernova Connection. In Chapter 9 in ”Gamma-Ray Bursts ; Kouveliotou, C., Wijers, R.A.M.J., Woosley, S., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2012; pp. 169–190. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.11 04.2274

2012 doi
[275]

The Metamorphosis of SN 1998bw

Patat, F.; Cappellaro, E.; Danziger, J.; Mazzali, P .A.; Sollerman, J.; Augusteijn, T.; Brewer, J.; Doublier, V .; Gonzalez, J.F.; Hainaut, O.; et al. The Metamorphosis of SN 1998bw. Astrophys. J. 2001, 555, 900–917. https://doi.org/10.1086/321526

2001 doi
[276]

The broad-lined Type Ic supernova 2003jd

Valenti, S.; Benetti, S.; Cappellaro, E.; Patat, F.; Mazzali, P .; Turatto, M.; Hurley, K.; Maeda, K.; Gal-Yam, A.; Foley, R.J.; et al. The broad-lined Type Ic supernova 2003jd. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2008, 383, 1485–1500. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.1 2647.x

2008
[277]

Aspherical Explosion Models for SN 1998bw/GRB 980425.Astrophys

Hoflich, P .; Wheeler, J.C.; Wang, L. Aspherical Explosion Models for SN 1998bw/GRB 980425.Astrophys. J. 1999, 521, 179–189. https://doi.org/10.1086/307521

1999 doi
[278]

An Asymmetric Energetic Type Ic Supernova Viewed Off-Axis, and a Link to Gamma Ray Bursts

Mazzali, P .A.; Kawabata, K.S.; Maeda, K.; Nomoto, K.; Filippenko, A.V .; Ramirez-Ruiz, E.; Benetti, S.; Pian, E.; Deng, J.; Tominaga, N.; et al. An Asymmetric Energetic Type Ic Supernova Viewed Off-Axis, and a Link to Gamma Ray Bursts. Science 2005, 308, 1284–1287. https://do...

2005 doi
[279]

An upper limit to the energy of gamma-ray bursts indicates that GRBs/SNe are powered by magnetars

Mazzali, P .A.; McFadyen, A.I.; Woosley, S.E.; Pian, E.; Tanaka, M. An upper limit to the energy of gamma-ray bursts indicates that GRBs/SNe are powered by magnetars. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2014, 443, 67–71. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu1124

2014 doi
[280]

Neutrino-dominated Accretion and Supernovae

Kohri, K.; Narayan, R.; Piran, T. Neutrino-dominated Accretion and Supernovae. Astrophys. J. 2005, 629, 341. https: //doi.org/10.1086/431354. Galaxies 2025, 1, 0 51 of 60

2005 doi
[281]

Neutrino Interactions in the Outflow from Gamma-Ray Burst Accretion Disks

Surman, R.; McLaughlin, G.C. Neutrino Interactions in the Outflow from Gamma-Ray Burst Accretion Disks. Astrophys. J. 2005, 618, 397–402. https://doi.org/10.1086/425901

2005 doi
[282]

Nucleosynthesis in the Outflow from Gamma-Ray Burst Accretion Disks

Surman, R.; McLaughlin, G.C.; Hix, W.R. Nucleosynthesis in the Outflow from Gamma-Ray Burst Accretion Disks. Astrophys. J. 2006, 643, 1057–1064. https://doi.org/10.1086/501116

2006 doi
[283]

Nucleosynthesis of Nickel-56 from Gamma-Ray Burst Accretion Disks

Surman, R.; McLaughlin, G.C.; Sabbatino, N. Nucleosynthesis of Nickel-56 from Gamma-Ray Burst Accretion Disks. Astrophys. J. 2011, 743, 155. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/743/2/155

2011 doi
[284]

Black Hole Hyperaccretion Inflow-Outflow Model

Song, C.Y.; Liu, T. Black Hole Hyperaccretion Inflow-Outflow Model. II. Long-duration Gamma-Ray Bursts and Supernova 56Ni Bumps. Astrophys. J. 2019, 871, 117. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aaf6ae

2019 doi
[285]

Jet-induced Explosions of Core Collapse Supernovae

Khokhlov, A.M.; Höflich, P .A.; Oran, E.S.; Wheeler, J.C.; Wang, L.; Chtchelkanova, A.Y. Jet-induced Explosions of Core Collapse Supernovae. Astrophys. J. Lett. 1999, 524, L107–L110. https://doi.org/10.1086/312305

1999 doi
[286]

Simulations of Magnetically Driven Supernova and Hypernova Explosions in the Context of Rapid Rotation

Burrows, A.; Dessart, L.; Livne, E.; Ott, C.D.; Murphy, J. Simulations of Magnetically Driven Supernova and Hypernova Explosions in the Context of Rapid Rotation. Astrophys. J. 2007, 664, 416–434. https://doi.org/10.1086/519161

2007 doi
[287]

Triggering jet-driven explosions of core-collapse supernovae by accretion from convective regions

Gilkis, A.; Soker, N. Triggering jet-driven explosions of core-collapse supernovae by accretion from convective regions. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2014, 439, 4011–4017. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu257

2014 doi
[288]

Unifying the Zoo of Jet-Driven Stellar Explosions

Lazzati, D.; Morsony, B.J.; Blackwell, C.H.; Begelman, M.C. Unifying the Zoo of Jet-Driven Stellar Explosions. Astrophys. J. 2012, 750, 68. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/750/1/68

2012 doi
[289]

The supernova–gamma-ray burst–jet connection

Hjorth, J. The supernova–gamma-ray burst–jet connection. Philos. T rans. R. Soc. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2013, 371, 20120275. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2012.0275

2013
[290]

The large landscape of supernova, GRB, and cocoon interactions.Mon

De Colle, F.; Kumar, P .; Hoeflich, P . The large landscape of supernova, GRB, and cocoon interactions.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2022, 512, 3627–3637. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac742

2022 doi
[291]

How Massive Single Stars End Their Life

Heger, A.; Fryer, C.L.; Woosley, S.E.; Langer, N.; Hartmann, D.H. How Massive Single Stars End Their Life. Astrophys. J. 2003, 591, 288–300. https://doi.org/10.1086/375341

2003 doi
[292]

The progenitors of core-collapse supernovae

Eldridge, J.J.; Tout, C.A. The progenitors of core-collapse supernovae. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2004, 353, 87–97. https: //doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08041.x

2004
[293]

The Landscape of the Neutrino Mechanism of Core-Collapse Supernovae: Neutron Star and Black Hole Mass Functions, Explosion Energies, and Nickel Yields

Pejcha, O.; Thompson, T.A. The Landscape of the Neutrino Mechanism of Core-Collapse Supernovae: Neutron Star and Black Hole Mass Functions, Explosion Energies, and Nickel Yields. Astrophys. J. 2015, 801, 90. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/801/2/90

2015 doi
[294]

New Solar Metallicity Measurements

Vagnozzi, S. New Solar Metallicity Measurements. Atoms 2019, 7, 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/atoms7020041

2019 doi
[295]

A Collapsar Model with Disk Wind: Implications for Supernovae Associated with Gamma-Ray Bursts

Hayakawa, T.; Maeda, K. A Collapsar Model with Disk Wind: Implications for Supernovae Associated with Gamma-Ray Bursts. Astrophys. J. 2018, 854, 43. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aaa76c

2018 doi
[296]

r-process Viable Outflows are Suppressed in Global Alpha-viscosity Models of Collapsar Disks

Just, O.; Aloy, M.A.; Obergaulinger, M.; Nagataki, S. r-process Viable Outflows are Suppressed in Global Alpha-viscosity Models of Collapsar Disks. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2022, 934, L30. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ac83a1

2022 doi
[297]

Supernovalike explosions of massive rotating stars from disks surrounding a black hole

Fujibayashi, S.; Lam, A.T.L.; Shibata, M.; Sekiguchi, Y. Supernovalike explosions of massive rotating stars from disks surrounding a black hole. Phys. Rev. D 2024, 109, 023031. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.023031

2024 doi
[298]

Collapsar disk outflows: Viscous hydrodynamic evolution in axisymmetry

Dean, C.; Fernández, R. Collapsar disk outflows: Viscous hydrodynamic evolution in axisymmetry. Phys. Rev. D 2024, 109, 083010. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.083010

2024 doi
[299]

The Connection between Gamma-Ray Bursts and Extremely Metal-poor Stars: Black Hole-forming Supernovae with Relativistic Jets

Tominaga, N.; Maeda, K.; Umeda, H.; Nomoto, K.; Tanaka, M.; Iwamoto, N.; Suzuki, T.; Mazzali, P .A. The Connection between Gamma-Ray Bursts and Extremely Metal-poor Stars: Black Hole-forming Supernovae with Relativistic Jets. Astrophys. J. 2007, 657, L77. https://doi.org/10.10...

2007 doi
[300]

Aspherical properties of hydrodynamics and nucleosynthesis in jet-induced supernovae

Tominaga, N. Aspherical properties of hydrodynamics and nucleosynthesis in jet-induced supernovae. Astrophys. J. 2008, 690, 526

2008

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Identification of Two Classes of Gamma-Ray Bursts

Kouveliotou, C.; Meegan, C.A.; Fishman, G.J.; Bhat, N.P .; Briggs, M.S.; Koshut, T.M.; Paciesas, W.S.; Pendleton, G.N. Identification of Two Classes of Gamma-Ray Bursts. Astrophys. J. Lett. 1993, 413, L101. https://doi.org/10.1086/186969

doi:10.1086/186969 1993

[2] [2]

Progenitors of Core-Collapse Supernovae

Smartt, S.J. Progenitors of Core-Collapse Supernovae. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 2009, 47, 63–106. https://doi.org/10.1146/ annurev-astro-082708-101737

2009

[3] [3]

An unusual supernova in the error box of the γ-ray burst of 25 April 1998

Galama, T.J.; Vreeswijk, P .M.; van Paradijs, J.; Kouveliotou, C.; Augusteijn, T.; Böhnhardt, H.; Brewer, J.P .; Doublier, V .; Gonzalez, J.F.; Leibundgut, B.; et al. An unusual supernova in the error box of the γ-ray burst of 25 April 1998. Nature 1998, 395, 670–672. https://doi.org/10.1038/27150

doi:10.1038/27150 1998

[4] [4]

Are Gamma-Ray Bursts in Star-Forming Regions?Astrophys

Paczy ´ nski, B. Are Gamma-Ray Bursts in Star-Forming Regions?Astrophys. J. Lett. 1998, 494, L45–L48. https://doi.org/10.1086/ 311148

1998

[5] [5]

Systematics and Biases in Observations of Supernovae Associated with Gamma-Ray Bursts

Belkin, S.; Pozanenko, A. Systematics and Biases in Observations of Supernovae Associated with Gamma-Ray Bursts. Pattern Recognit. Image Anal. 2023, 33, 86–91. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1054661823020025

doi:10.1134/s1054661823020025 2023

[6] [6]

A very luminous magnetar-powered supernova associated with an ultra-long γ-ray burst

Greiner, J.; Mazzali, P .A.; Kann, D.A.; Krühler, T.; Pian, E.; Prentice, S.; Olivares E., F.; Rossi, A.; Klose, S.;Taubenberger, S.; et al. A very luminous magnetar-powered supernova associated with an ultra-long γ-ray burst. Nature 2015, 523, 189–192. https: //doi.org/10.1038/nature14579

doi:10.1038/nature14579 2015

[7] [7]

The Ep,I-Eiso correlation: Type I gamma-ray bursts and the new classification method

Minaev, P .Y.; Pozanenko, A.S. The Ep,I-Eiso correlation: Type I gamma-ray bursts and the new classification method. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2020, 492, 1919–1936. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz3611

doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3611 2020

[8] [8]

Short gamma-ray bursts in the SPI-ACS INTEGRAL experiment.Astrophys

Minaev, P .Y.; Pozanenko, A.S.; Loznikov, V .M. Short gamma-ray bursts in the SPI-ACS INTEGRAL experiment.Astrophys. Bull. 2010, 65, 326–333. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1990341310040024

doi:10.1134/s1990341310040024 2010