pith. sign in

arxiv: 2505.04048 · v2 · pith:R6WAQ57Snew · submitted 2025-05-07 · 💻 cs.DS

The Kinetic Hourglass Data Structure for Computing the Bottleneck Distance of Dynamic Data

Elizabeth Munch , Elena Xinyi Wang , Carola Wenk This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 08:07 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.DS
keywords kinetic data structuresbottleneck distancegeometric matchingpersistent homology transformdynamic algorithmstopological data analysis
0
0 comments X

The pith

The kinetic hourglass is a kinetic data structure that maintains the bottleneck distance for continuously moving geometric objects.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces the kinetic hourglass as a new kinetic data structure implementation to compute the bottleneck distance for geometric matching problems. It specifies the events and updates required for general graphs and supplies a complexity analysis of those operations. The method is demonstrated by maintaining the bottleneck distance between persistent homology transforms of shapes in the plane, where each transform summarizes topological features seen from every direction on the circle.

Core claim

The kinetic hourglass maintains the minimum bottleneck matching by responding to certificate failures that signal changes in the optimal matching as points move continuously. For general graphs it processes a sequence of events that update the matching while keeping the overall complexity bounded.

What carries the argument

The kinetic hourglass, a kinetic data structure that tracks the bottleneck distance through certificate failures and updates on general graphs.

If this is right

  • The bottleneck distance between two moving point sets can be maintained over time through a sequence of discrete events.
  • The structure extends to computing bottleneck distances between persistent homology transforms of deforming shapes.
  • Complexity bounds hold for general graphs rather than only for special cases such as bipartite matchings.
  • Updates preserve the minimum bottleneck property after each certificate failure.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same event-driven approach could be adapted to maintain other matching costs if suitable certificates can be defined.
  • Dynamic versions of topological summaries become feasible when shapes undergo continuous rigid motions.
  • Integration with existing kinetic structures for convex hulls or Delaunay triangulations might reduce the total event count further.

Load-bearing premise

Certificate failures and event processing in the kinetic hourglass can be bounded efficiently for general graphs without excessive overhead.

What would settle it

A concrete moving configuration of points in which the number of certificate failures processed by the kinetic hourglass exceeds the claimed complexity bound.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.04048 by Carola Wenk, Elena Xinyi Wang, Elizabeth Munch.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Construction of the bipartite graph G based on the persistence diagrams X and Y . the complete bipartite graph G = (U ⊔ V, U × V, c), where for u ∈ U and v ∈ V , the weight function c is given by c(uv) = ( ∥u − v∥∞ if u ∈ X or v ∈ Y 0 if u ∈ X and v ∈ Y . An example of the bipartite graph construction is shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Kinetic heap event updates Scenario Kinetic Heap Kinetic Hanger Lines O(n log2 n) O(n log2 n) Line segments O(n √ m log3/2 m) O(nα(m) log2 m) s-intersecting curves O(n 2 log2 n) O(λs(n) log2 n) s-intersecting curve segments O(mn log2 m) O(n/mλs+2(m) log2 m) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Illustration of construction of the kinetic hourglass. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Illustration of Scenario 1 of and M-Event; see Lemma 3.3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Illustration of Scenario 2 of M-Event; see Lemma 3.3. 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: An example of the weight function c. The two figures in the middle visualize the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The kinetic data structure (KDS) framework is a powerful tool for maintaining various geometric configurations of continuously moving objects. In this work, we introduce the kinetic hourglass, a novel KDS implementation designed to compute the bottleneck distance for geometric matching problems. We detail the events and updates required for handling general graphs, accompanied by a complexity analysis. Furthermore, we demonstrate the utility of the kinetic hourglass by applying it to compute the bottleneck distance between two persistent homology transforms (PHTs) derived from shapes in $\mathbb{R}^2$, which are topological summaries obtained by computing persistent homology from every direction in $\mathbb{S}^1$.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper introduces the kinetic hourglass as a novel kinetic data structure (KDS) for maintaining the bottleneck distance under continuous motion of points in geometric matching problems. It describes the events and updates needed to handle general graphs, provides an accompanying complexity analysis, and applies the structure to compute bottleneck distances between persistent homology transforms (PHTs) of shapes in R^2.

Significance. If the complexity analysis is correct, the kinetic hourglass would extend KDS techniques to a new setting with potential applications in dynamic topological data analysis; the PHT demonstration indicates a concrete use case for shape comparison.

major comments (1)
  1. [Events and updates for general graphs] The section detailing events and updates for general graphs: the central claim that certificate failures and event processing can be bounded efficiently (as required for the stated complexity) is load-bearing, yet the provided description remains at the level of high-level event types without explicit bounds or proof sketches visible in the abstract; this needs to be substantiated to support the overall efficiency claim.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract provides only a high-level overview; including the specific complexity bounds achieved would strengthen the summary of contributions.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful review and the recommendation of minor revision. The positive assessment of the kinetic hourglass and its potential applications in dynamic topological data analysis is appreciated. We respond to the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Events and updates for general graphs] The section detailing events and updates for general graphs: the central claim that certificate failures and event processing can be bounded efficiently (as required for the stated complexity) is load-bearing, yet the provided description remains at the level of high-level event types without explicit bounds or proof sketches visible in the abstract; this needs to be substantiated to support the overall efficiency claim.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract is necessarily high-level. The full manuscript details the event types, certificate failures, and processing for general graphs in the body text (following the introduction of the kinetic hourglass), together with the accompanying complexity analysis. To make the efficiency bounds and their justification more immediately visible and self-contained, we will add explicit statements of the bounds together with a concise proof sketch in a dedicated paragraph or subsection of the revised version. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained

full rationale

The paper introduces the kinetic hourglass as a novel KDS for bottleneck distance computation on general graphs, accompanied by an explicit complexity analysis of events and updates. This rests on the standard KDS framework (certificate failures, event processing) applied to a new structure, without any reduction of the claimed bounds to fitted parameters, self-definitional equations, or load-bearing self-citations. The PHT application is presented as a demonstration rather than a derivation that loops back to the paper's own inputs. No quoted step equates a prediction or uniqueness claim to its own construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

Review based on abstract only; full paper details on parameters and assumptions unavailable. Relies on standard KDS event-driven maintenance without introducing new fitted constants or entities beyond the named structure.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Kinetic data structure framework can maintain geometric configurations of continuously moving objects via discrete events and certificate failures.
    Invoked in the opening sentence as the foundational tool for the new structure.
invented entities (1)
  • kinetic hourglass no independent evidence
    purpose: Compute and maintain bottleneck distance for geometric matching in dynamic settings
    New data structure introduced to handle the specific problem; no independent evidence provided in abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5634 in / 1214 out tokens · 29881 ms · 2026-05-25T08:07:43.757159+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

27 extracted references · 27 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Staying in the middle: Exact and approximate medians in R1 and R2 for moving points

    Pankaj K Agarwal, Mark De Berg, Jie Gao, Leonidas J Guibas, and Sariel Har-Peled. Staying in the middle: Exact and approximate medians in R1 and R2 for moving points. In CCCG, pages 43–46, 2005

    work page 2005

  2. [2]

    Agarwal, Jie Gao, and Leonidas J

    Pankaj K. Agarwal, Jie Gao, and Leonidas J. Guibas. Kinetic medians and kd-trees. In Rolf M¨ ohring and Rajeev Raman, editors, Algorithms — ESA 2002 , pages 5–17, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2002. Springer Berlin Heidelberg

    work page 2002

  3. [3]

    Agarwal and Micha Sharir

    Pankaj K. Agarwal and Micha Sharir. Davenport–schinzel sequences and their geometric applications. In J.-R. Sack and J. Urrutia, editors, Handbook of Computational Geometry, pages 1–47. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 2000

    work page 2000

  4. [4]

    Decomposing the persistent homology transform of star-shaped objects, 2024

    Shreya Arya, Barbara Giunti, Abigail Hickok, Lida Kanari, Sarah McGuire, and Katharine Turner. Decomposing the persistent homology transform of star-shaped objects, 2024

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    Data structures for mobile data

    Julien Basch, Leonidas J Guibas, and John Hershberger. Data structures for mobile data. Journal of Algorithms , 31(1):1–28, 1999

    work page 1999

  6. [6]

    Guibas, and G

    Julien Basch, Leonidas J. Guibas, and G. D. Ramkumar. Sweeping lines and line segments with a heap. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Symposium on Computational Ge- ometry, SCG ’97, page 469–471, New York, NY, USA, 1997. Association for Computing Machinery

    work page 1997

  7. [7]

    Guibas, and G

    Julien Basch, Leonidas J. Guibas, and G. D. Ramkumar. Reporting red—blue intersections between two sets of connected line segments. Algorithmica, 35(1):1–20, Jan 2003

    work page 2003

  8. [8]

    Geometric Matching and Bottleneck Problems

    Sergio Cabello, Siu-Wing Cheng, Otfried Cheong, and Christian Knauer. Geometric Matching and Bottleneck Problems. In Wolfgang Mulzer and Jeff M. Phillips, editors, 40th International Symposium on Computational Geometry (SoCG 2024) , volume 293 of Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs) , pages 31:1–31:15, Dagstuhl, Germany, 2024. Schloss...

    work page 2024

  9. [9]

    A dis- tance for geometric graphs via the labeled merge tree interleaving distance

    Erin Wolf Chambers, Elizabeth Munch, Sarah Percival, and Elena Xinyi Wang. A dis- tance for geometric graphs via the labeled merge tree interleaving distance. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.09442, 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  10. [10]

    Paul Chew and Klara Kedem

    L. Paul Chew and Klara Kedem. Improvements on geometric pattern matching problems. In Otto Nurmi and Esko Ukkonen, editors,Algorithm Theory — SWAT ’92, pages 318–325, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1992. Springer Berlin Heidelberg

    work page 1992

  11. [11]

    Stability of persistence diagrams

    David Cohen-Steiner, Herbert Edelsbrunner, and John Harer. Stability of persistence diagrams. Discrete & Computational Geometry , 37(1):103–120, Jan 2007

    work page 2007

  12. [12]

    Vines and vineyards by updating persistence in linear time

    David Cohen-Steiner, Herbert Edelsbrunner, and Dmitriy Morozov. Vines and vineyards by updating persistence in linear time. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Sym- posium on Computational Geometry , SCG ’06, page 119–126, New York, NY, USA, 2006. Association for Computing Machinery. 17

    work page 2006

  13. [13]

    How many directions determine a shape and other sufficiency results for two topological transforms

    Justin Curry, Sayan Mukherjee, and Katharine Turner. How many directions determine a shape and other sufficiency results for two topological transforms. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, Series B , 2018

    work page 2018

  14. [14]

    da Fonseca, Celina M.H

    Guilherme D. da Fonseca, Celina M.H. de Figueiredo, and Paulo C.P. Carvalho. Kinetic hanger. Information Processing Letters, 89(3):151–157, 2004

    work page 2004

  15. [15]

    Dey and Cheng Xin

    Tamal K. Dey and Cheng Xin. Computing Bottleneck Distance for 2-D Interval Decom- posable Modules. In Bettina Speckmann and Csaba D. T´ oth, editors, 34th International Symposium on Computational Geometry (SoCG 2018) , volume 99 of Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), pages 32:1–32:15, Dagstuhl, Germany, 2018. Schloss Dagstuhl – Leib...

    work page 2018

  16. [16]

    Computational Topology for Data Analysis

    Tamal Krishna Dey and Yusu Wang. Computational Topology for Data Analysis . Cam- bridge University Press, 1 edition, 2017

    work page 2017

  17. [17]

    Computational Topology - an Introduction

    Herbert Edelsbrunner and John Harer. Computational Topology - an Introduction. Amer- ican Mathematical Society, 2010

    work page 2010

  18. [18]

    Efrat, A

    A. Efrat, A. Itai, and M. J. Katz. Geometry helps in bottleneck matching and related problems. Algorithmica, 31(1):1–28, Sep 2001

    work page 2001

  19. [19]

    Persistent homology and Euler integral transforms

    Robert Ghrist, Rachel Levanger, and Huy Mai. Persistent homology and Euler integral transforms. Journal of Applied and Computational Topology , 2(1):55–60, Oct 2018

    work page 2018

  20. [20]

    Leonidas J. Guibas. Kinetic data structures: a state of the art report. In Proceedings of the Third Workshop on the Algorithmic Foundations of Robotics on Robotics: The Algorithmic Perspective: The Algorithmic Perspective , WAFR ’98, page 191–209, USA, 1998. A. K. Peters, Ltd

    work page 1998

  21. [21]

    Modeling motion

    Leonidas J Guibas and Marcel Roeloffzen. Modeling motion. In Csba D. Toth, Joseph O’Rourke, and Jacob E. Goodman, editors, Handbook of Discrete and Computational Ge- ometry (3rd ed.), chapter 57, pages 1117 – 1134. Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2017

    work page 2017

  22. [22]

    Hopcroft and Richard M

    John E. Hopcroft and Richard M. Karp. An n5/2 algorithm for maximum matchings in bipartite graphs. SIAM J. Comput. , 2(4):225–231, Dec 1973

    work page 1973

  23. [23]

    Geometry helps to compare persistence diagrams

    Michael Kerber, Dmitriy Morozov, and Arnur Nigmetov. Geometry helps to compare persistence diagrams. ACM J. Exp. Algorithmics , 22, sep 2017

    work page 2017

  24. [24]

    Spatiotemporal persistent homology for dynamic metric spaces

    Woojin Kim and Facundo M´ emoli. Spatiotemporal persistent homology for dynamic metric spaces. Discrete & Computational Geometry , 66(3):831–875, Oct 2021

    work page 2021

  25. [25]

    Katharine Turner, Sayan Mukherjee, and Doug M. Boyer. Persistent homology transform for modeling shapes and surfaces. Information and Inference: A Journal of the IMA , 3(4):310–344, 12 2014

    work page 2014

  26. [26]

    The extended persistent homology transform of manifolds with boundary

    Katharine Turner, Vanessa Robins, and James Morgan. The extended persistent homology transform of manifolds with boundary. Journal of Applied and Computational Topology , May 2024

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    Topaz, and Lori Ziegelmeier

    Lu Xian, Henry Adams, Chad M. Topaz, and Lori Ziegelmeier. Capturing dynamics of time-varying data via topology, 2022. 18

    work page 2022