The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2505.18523 · v1 · pith:XU7WQC5W · submitted 2025-05-24 · cs.CY

Diversity and Inclusion in AI: Insights from a Survey of AI/ML Practitioners

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:XU7WQC5Wrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.CY
keywords practicesprinciplesawarenessbarrierschallengescurrentdespitediversity
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Growing awareness of social biases and inequalities embedded in Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems has brought increased attention to the integration of Diversity and Inclusion (D&I) principles throughout the AI lifecycle. Despite the rise of ethical AI guidelines, there is limited empirical evidence on how D&I is applied in real-world settings. This study explores how AI and Machine Learning(ML) practitioners perceive and implement D&I principles and identifies organisational challenges that hinder their effective adoption. Using a mixed-methods approach, we surveyed industry professionals, collecting both quantitative and qualitative data on current practices, perceived impacts, and challenges related to D&I in AI. While most respondents recognise D&I as essential for mitigating bias and enhancing fairness, practical implementation remains inconsistent. Our analysis revealed a disconnect between perceived benefits and current practices, with major barriers including the under-representation of marginalised groups, lack of organisational transparency, and limited awareness among early-career professionals. Despite these barriers, respondents widely agree that diverse teams contribute to ethical, trustworthy, and innovative AI systems. By underpinning the key pain points and areas requiring improvement, this study highlights the need to bridge the gap between D&I principles and real-world AI development practices.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.