REVIEW 3 cited by
Reinforcing VLMs to Use Tools for Detailed Visual Reasoning Under Resource Constraints
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Reinforcing VLMs to Use Tools for Detailed Visual Reasoning Under Resource Constraints
read the original abstract
Despite tremendous recent advances in large model reasoning ability, vision-language models (VLMs) still struggle with detailed visual reasoning, especially when compute resources are limited. To address this challenge, we draw inspiration from methods like Deepseek-r1 for VLMs and train smaller-scale models with Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) to use external tools such as zoom. The greatest benefit is obtained with a combination of GRPO learning, a simple reward structure, a simplified tool-calling interface, allocating additional tokens to the result of the tool call, and a training data mix that over-represents visually difficult examples. Compared to similarly-sized baseline models, our method achieves better performance on some visual question-answering (VQA) tasks, thanks to the detailed visual information gathered from the external tool.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Visual Reasoning through Tool-supervised Reinforcement Learning
ToolsRL trains MLLMs via a tool-specific then accuracy-focused RL curriculum to master visual tools for complex reasoning tasks.
-
From Structure to Synergy: A Survey of Vision-Language Perception Paradigm Evolution in Multimodal Large Language Models
The survey formalizes MLLM perception as a unified vision-language capability and traces its evolution via a new five-stage taxonomy while outlining future challenges.
-
Robusto-2: Benchmarking Humans & VLMs for Autonomous Driving in Lima & New York City
Humans and VLMs diverge in VQA responses on driving footage, with human answers consistent across origins and no strong geography modulation observed, likely due to high OOD nature.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.