Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 52 references

Tunable magnon emission from a nano-optomagnet

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A single ~130 nm gold nanodisc on yttrium iron garnet converts an amplitude-modulated infrared laser into coherent magnons at the modulation frequency—a tunable, all-optical, nanoscale magnon source.

desk verdict A believable first demonstration of tunable GHz magnon emission from a single gold nanodisc under modulated CW light; the IFE mechanism is plausible but not established, and the paper's own model mismatches keep it conditional. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.10742 v1 pith:S62LZSZS submitted 2025-07-14 physics.optics physics.app-ph

Anna Duvakina , Vage Karakhanyan , Mingran Xu , Miguel-Angel Suarez , Axel J. M. Deenen , Marina Raschetti , Andrea Mucchietto , Thierry Grosjean
show 1 more author
Dirk Grundler
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticsphysics.app-ph
keywords magnonicsspinwavesinverseFaradayeffectplasmonicsBrillouinlightscatteringyttriumirongarnetnanoscalemagnonsourceall-opticalexcitation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports a nanoscale source of spin waves (magnons) made from a single gold nanodisc on a magnetic garnet film. The disc is illuminated by an infrared laser whose intensity is chopped at a gigahertz frequency, and Brillouin light scattering detects magnons in the film at exactly that chopping frequency. The authors interpret the conversion as a plasmon-enhanced inverse Faraday effect: the disc's plasmon resonance concentrates the light and generates a time-varying magnetic field that drives spin precession in the garnet. Because the magnon frequency is set by the external modulator, the source is tunable by simply changing the modulation frequency, and it operates with a low-power continuous-wave laser. If this holds, it would replace bulky microwave antennas with compact, optically driven magnon emitters for magnonic circuits.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the plasmon-enhanced inverse Faraday effect in an individual Au nanodisc. The localized surface plasmon resonance concentrates the modulated 808 nm field and drives azimuthal currents in the disc; via the inverse Faraday effect these currents generate a dynamic magnetic field, whose out-of-plane component $B_z$ is computed with a hydrodynamic free-electron model and Biot-Savart integration. This field, multiplied by the modulation envelope $|\sin(2\pi(f/2)t)|$, acts as a time-dependent source term in Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert simulations of the YIG film, producing coherent magnons at the modulation frequency. The frequency is set externally by an electro-optic modulator, which is what makes the source tunable.

What would settle it

Record the angular emission pattern and the diameter series using a nanodisc with near-perfect circular symmetry and no edge roughness. If the inverse Faraday mechanism as modeled is correct, the measured pattern should match the simulated one without the -90° rotation and the diameter optimum should move toward the predicted 110 nm. A second test is to sweep the pump helicity from right to left: the emission should reverse its handedness-dependent phase or direction; a helicity-insensitive response would rule out the inverse Faraday effect as the driver.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that an integrated Au nanodisc, about 130 nm in diameter, functions as an optomagnetic nanoemitter: when a right-circularly-polarized, amplitude-modulated 808 nm laser is focused on it, the disc launches coherent spin waves into the underlying 113-nm YIG film at the laser's modulation frequency (3.6, 4.5, or 7.4 GHz). The magnons appear only when the beam is modulated, only when it strikes the disc (not bare YIG), and only when the applied magnetic field places the magnon band below the modulation frequency. The amplitude is largest for circular polarization and varies with disc diameter, peaking near 150 nm while the simplified optomagnetic-field model predicts a peak at 110 nm; the paper attributes the shift and the non-ideal emission pattern to edge roughness, heating, and possible spin injection. The authors support the mechanism with micromagnetic simulations that show coherent, anisotropic spin-wave emission from the computed plasmonic optomagnetic field, and conclude that plasmonic nanoantennas can serve as reconfigurable nanoscale magnon sources controlled entirely by optical modulation.

Load-bearing premise

The central premise is that the observed magnons are generated by the plasmon-enhanced inverse Faraday effect; if the actual driver is heating, spin injection, or another mechanism, the tunable emission would persist but the paper's interpretation would not.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Magnon sources can shrink to a single nanodisc footprint rather than requiring coplanar waveguides tens to hundreds of micrometers across.
  • A single modulated laser can drive many emitters at different frequencies simultaneously using multi-tone modulation, enabling frequency-division multiplexing in magnonic circuits.
  • The emission frequency is set by the external modulator, so upgrading to faster electro-optic modulators should push magnon generation to tens of gigahertz and beyond.
  • The scheme works with a standard 3 mW continuous-wave laser, avoiding high-peak-power pulsed lasers and lowering the energy budget for generating spin waves.
  • Spin waves detectable by Brillouin light scattering provide a sensitive local probe of plasmon-induced optomagnetic fields, so the same platform can be used to study nanoscale light-matter interaction.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension the authors gesture at but do not compute: the measured BLS amplitude as a function of position could be inverted to reconstruct the vector optomagnetic field generated by the disc, turning the magnon pattern into a nanoscale field-mapping tool.
  • The systematic -90° rotation between the simulated and measured emission patterns suggests the static in-plane magnetic field's Lorentz force on the opto-induced currents matters; modeling that force explicitly (as the authors note is needed) would predict the rotation and provide a sharper test of the inverse Faraday mechanism.
  • The diameter mismatch (optimum at 150 nm measured vs 110 nm predicted) may indicate that the relevant drive is not the $B_z$ component at the interface but its gradient or the spatial overlap with the spin-wave mode profile; a simulation using the full vector field as the source term could test this without new experiments.
  • If the mechanism extends to arrays, the same modulated laser could write reconfigurable magnonic circuits by addressing selected discs, with each disc acting as an independent phase-controlled emitter—this is speculative but follows directly from the demonstrated frequency selectivity.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports micro-focus BLS measurements showing that an amplitude-modulated continuous-wave 808 nm laser focused on individual Au nanodiscs on a YIG film generates magnons at the modulation frequency (3.6, 4.5, and 7.4 GHz). The core observation is supported by control measurements: the enhanced BLS peak appears only with the Au disc present, with the IR beam on, and with the IR beam modulated, and it disappears when the magnetic field is raised to 100 mT so that the modulation frequency lies below the magnon band. The authors attribute the mechanism to a plasmon-enhanced inverse Faraday effect, using a hydrodynamic model of the optomagnetic field and micromagnetic simulations to compare with the measured diameter dependence and angular emission pattern. The basic emissive phenomenon is credible, but the quantitative validation of the IFE mechanism is incomplete: the model predicts a diameter optimum and a spatial pattern that differ from the measurements, and the handedness test that would distinguish the IFE is absent.

Significance. If the mechanism is confirmed, the result would be a valuable nanoscale, frequency-tunable magnon source that avoids coplanar waveguide antennas and is controlled entirely by the modulation of a CW laser. The direct observation of modulation-frequency magnons with clear controls is a solid experimental result, and the manuscript is transparent about its simulation protocol, normalization, and parameter choices. However, the paper's central mechanistic claim currently rests on comparisons that do not quantitatively match the model. The diameter response and the angular emission pattern are both inconsistent with the simulation in ways the authors attribute to unspecified effects, and the helicity reversal expected for the inverse Faraday effect is untested. The significance is therefore conditional on additional experimental and modeling work.

major comments (4)
  1. [Results, 'Tuning the plasmon resonance of nanodiscs'; Figure 2b] The quantitative support for the inverse Faraday effect mechanism is not established by the diameter dependence. The hydrodynamic model predicts a maximum of the out-of-plane optomagnetic field Bz at D = 110 nm, whereas the measured BLS amplitude peaks at D = 150 nm and shows a local minimum at D = 110 nm. The manuscript itself states that this local minimum is 'in contrast to the peak predicted' by the calculations. The explanation given, a trade-off between plasmon-enhanced IFE and photothermal or other local modifications of the YIG state, is plausible but is not backed by any independent measurement in this paper. As written, Figure 2b is evidence against the model rather than evidence for it, and the claim that the diameter dependence is 'consistent with a plasmon-enhanced inverse Faraday effect' is therefore not supportable.
  2. [Results, 'Measured spin wave emission pattern...'; Figure 3a vs. Figure S5] The simulated spatial profile of magnon amplitudes is rotated by -90 degrees relative to the measured emission pattern, as the authors note. This is a symmetry mismatch, not a scaling or amplitude discrepancy, and it directly concerns the spatial distribution of the optomagnetic field h0(r) that feeds the micromagnetic simulation. The proposed explanations (edge roughness, local heating, spin injection) are offered without supporting evidence or a testable model. Because the simulated pattern is a direct prediction of the proposed mechanism, the failure to reproduce the measured pattern leaves the quantitative basis of the IFE attribution unvalidated. The authors should either provide a model that matches the measured pattern, or explicitly limit the claim to the qualitative observation of magnon emission.
  3. [Methods, 'Optical bench'; Results, 'Measured spin wave emission pattern...'] The handedness test that would distinguish the inverse Faraday effect from other polarization-dependent mechanisms is missing. The paper compares right circularly polarized (RCP) and linearly polarized (LP) illumination, but never measures left circularly polarized (LCP) illumination. The IFE effective field reverses sign when the helicity is reversed, while polarization-dependent absorption and heating do not reverse in the same way. Without an LCP measurement, the observation that RCP gives stronger BLS than LP does not uniquely identify the IFE; alternative mechanisms such as circular-dichroic heating or polarization-dependent optoelastic driving are not excluded. Adding an LCP comparison is a straightforward and decisive test and should be reported before the mechanism is assigned.
  4. [Supporting Information, Section S1; Results, 'Optical source of spin waves'] The choice of the primary detection position introduces a selection bias that affects the reported angular and polarization comparisons. Section S1 states that Position 1 was selected because, for Nanodisc I, the β = -30 degrees direction gave the highest BLS amplitude. The main text, however, defines Position 1 as β = 30 degrees, and Figure 3b reports β = -30 degrees; the sign inconsistency must be corrected. More importantly, if the main comparison between RCP and LP is made at the angular position that was chosen because it maximized the RCP signal, the measured anisotropy and the RCP/LP amplitude ratio are not representative. The authors should report the full angular maps for each polarization and state how the analysis position was selected.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Supporting Information, Section S1; main text Results] Position 1 is defined with β = 30 degrees in the main text and β = -30 degrees in Section S1; the sign must be made consistent throughout, including in the caption of Figure 3b.
  2. [Methods, 'Micromagnetic simulations'] There is a typo in 'gryomagnetic ratio' which should be 'gyromagnetic ratio'.
  3. [Figure 2b caption and text] The text refers to the calculated component as 'Bz' and the caption also uses 'Bz'; for clarity, identify the coordinate system relative to the nanodisc axis and the YIG film normal, since BLS probes the out-of-plane dynamic magnetization.
  4. [Results, 'Measured spin wave emission pattern...'] The angular emission pattern in Figure 3a is measured on Nanodisc II, whereas Position 1 was selected on Nanodisc I. Please state explicitly which nanodisc is used for each measurement and whether the two discs showed the same position dependence, because nominally identical nanodiscs may differ in edge roughness.
  5. [Methods, 'Optical bench'] The phrase 'a RCP beam reflected from the dichroic mirror' is grammatically awkward; use 'an RCP beam'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular derivation found; the mechanistic model is self-cited but is not fitted to the data and explicitly fails two quantitative comparisons.

full rationale

The core experimental claim, magnon peaks at the laser modulation frequencies, is self-contained: it is supported by BLS spectra with controls (no IR, no modulation, bare YIG, out-of-band magnetic field), and the frequency matching is read directly from the spectra. The mechanistic attribution to the plasmon-enhanced inverse Faraday effect uses an optomagnetic-field profile computed with a hydrodynamic model from the authors' prior work (refs 25,29), but that model is parameter-free, externally published, and not fitted to the BLS amplitudes; therefore the self-citation is independent support rather than a circular reduction. Crucially, the paper itself reports that this model fails on two quantitative points: it predicts the Bz maximum at D=110 nm while the measured BLS maximum is at D=150 nm (Fig. 2b), and the simulated magnon pattern is rotated by -90 degrees relative to the measured emission pattern (Fig. 3a vs Fig. S5). A failed prediction cannot force the claimed result. The arbitrary normalization (6.3 mT) of the micromagnetic drive and the selection of Position 1 based on the strongest measured signal (Section S1) are experimental and interpretive weaknesses that bear on correctness, but neither reduces a prediction to an input by construction. No equation or fitting step makes the derived quantity equivalent to its input, so no circular step is identified.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The experimental observation of magnons at modulation frequencies is largely self-contained and does not depend on the authors' prior model, so the central claim carries low circularity burden. However, the mechanistic interpretation and the quantitative support (Fig. 2b and the micromagnetic simulations) rest entirely on the group's own hydrodynamic optomagnetic model, and the simulation amplitude is chosen by hand. The unmatched diameter peak and -90 degree rotation show the model is not yet predictive, so the interpretation is best treated as a hypothesis.

free parameters (2)
  • Optomagnetic field normalization amplitude = 6.3 mT (maximum out-of-plane component)
    Driving-field amplitude in the Mumax3 simulation; chosen arbitrarily for normalization rather than derived from laser power or a parameter-free model (Methods section on micromagnetic simulations).
  • Primary detection position (Position 1) = ρ=450 nm, β=-30°
    Selected after position-dependent scans because it yielded the highest BLS amplitude for Nanodisc I (Supporting Information Section S1). This data-dependent selection affects all main-spectra comparisons.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The inverse Faraday effect in the gold nanodisc produces a local dynamic magnetic field that drives magnon precession in YIG at the modulation frequency.
    Central interpretation in Introduction/Results; mechanism is supported by prior literature but not independently confirmed here; enters via the circular-polarization dependence claim.
  • domain assumption The hydrodynamic free-electron model of gold correctly predicts the spatial distribution and relative magnitude of the optomagnetic field Bz(D).
    Underlies Figure 2b (orange triangles) and the excitation profile for simulations; originates in the authors' previous papers (refs 25,26,29), no external benchmark in this work.
  • standard math The Kalinikos-Slavin dispersion relation with literature YIG parameters gives the magnon bands used to assign observed frequencies.
    Used to identify allowed modes at 3.6, 4.5, 7.4 GHz; standard theory, parameters from prior literature.
  • domain assumption The BLS signal is proportional to the square of the dynamic out-of-plane magnetization at the probe spot.
    Stated in Methods: 'The BLS signal was assumed to be proportional to the square of the amplitude of the dynamic component of the out-of-plane magnetization.'
  • domain assumption Heating and spin injection do not dominate the spin-wave generation, or if they do, they are accounted for qualitatively.
    Paper uses unchanged PSSW peak to exclude magnetization modification (Fig. S7) but simultaneously invokes heating and spin injection as possible causes of the diameter and anisotropy mismatches; the two statements are in tension.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Tunable magnon emission from a nano-optomagnet." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/S62LZSZS

@misc{pith2026250710742,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Tunable magnon emission from a nano-optomagnet},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/S62LZSZS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.10742}
}
read the original abstract

The growing demand for dense, energy-efficient, and high-frequency signal processing continues to drive device miniaturization. While downscaling remains a central challenge, magnons offer a promising solution as nanoscale signal carriers, supporting broadband operation from GHz to THz without moving charge carriers and generating Joule heating. However, their integration at the nanoscale is limited by conventional electrical excitation based on coplanar waveguides, which require metal pads few to hundreds of micrometres in size. Here, we demonstrate tunable magnon emission into a yttrium iron garnet film by focusing microwave-modulated laser light onto an integrated Au nanodisc. Using inelastic light scattering spectroscopy, we observe magnons whose frequencies match the optical modulation frequencies in the GHz frequency regime. The largest magnon amplitudes are found for circularly polarized laser light and specific nanodisc diameters consistent with a plasmon-enhanced inverse Faraday effect. These results establish plasmonic nanoantennas as reconfigurable nanoscale magnon sources, enabling broadband signal generation governed entirely by optical modulation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.10742 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Broadband excitation of monochromatic spin waves by an optomagnetic nanoemitter. a, Spin waves (blue spheres and wavefronts) are optomagnetically excited by infrared (IR) light (red) focused on top of the Au nanodisc (gold) and detected in the YIG film via inelastic light scattering. The probe laser (green) is positioned at a radial distance ρ and angle β in a cylindrical coordinate system centered on the disc. Inse… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Variation of the Nanodisc Diameters and Plasmon Resonances. a, Brillouin light scattering (BLS) spectra measured for eight Au nanodiscs with diameters ranging from 70 nm to 190 nm, under 20 mT in-plane magnetic field and modulation at fmod = 3.6 GHz of the IR beam (measured at Positions 1). The red curves represent Lorentzian fits to the spectra. b, Black squares: amplitudes of BLS intensity extracted from the Loren… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Directional spin-wave emission from an optomagnet for both RCP and LP excitation. a, Measured spin wave emission pattern under optical excitation modulated at 3.6 GHz in the presence of a 20 mT in-plane external magnetic field. The IR excitation light is either RCP (red dots) or LP (blue dots). Black dashed circle: background BLS signal level on Position 1, in the absence of IR light. Inset: SEM image of the tested … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Experimental setup The laser source (LP808-SA60) emits an 808 nm wavelength laser beam, which passes through a fiber polarizer (ILP780PM-APC), then is directed toward a GHz Modulator (EX￾AIL: NIR-MX800-LN-10), and finally to the coupler (Thorlabs). At the coupler, part…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a) Wavelength dependent permittivity of gold, (b) physical constants, where me is the electron mass, ε0 is the vacuum permittivity, µ0 is the vacuum permeability, c is the speed of light in vacuum, e is the elementary charge. (c) Optical constants of gold. ωp represen…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Khitun, A.; Bao, M.; Wang, K. L. Magnonic logic circuits. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2010, 43, 264005

    work page 2010

  2. [2]

    V.; Serga, A

    Chumak, A. V.; Serga, A. A.; Hillebrands, B. Magnon transistor for all-magnon data processing. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 4700

    work page 2014

  3. [3]

    V.; Hamdioui, S.; Adelmann, C.; Cotofana, S

    Mahmoud, A.; Ciubotaru, F.; Vanderveken, F.; Chumak, A. V.; Hamdioui, S.; Adelmann, C.; Cotofana, S. Introduction to spin wave computing. J. Appl. Phys. 2020, 128, 161101

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    Omnidirectional spin-wave nanograting coupler

    Yu, H.; Duerr, G.; Huber, R.; Bahr, M.; Schwarze, T.; Brandl, F.; Grundler, D. Omnidirectional spin-wave nanograting coupler. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2702

    work page 2013

  5. [5]

    Chiral Emission of Exchange Spin Waves by Magnetic Skyrmions

    Chen, J.; Hu, J.; Yu, H. Chiral Emission of Exchange Spin Waves by Magnetic Skyrmions. ACS Nano 2021, 15, 4372--4379, PMID: 33645959

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    Magnetic vortex cores as tunable spin-wave emitters

    Wintz, S.; Tiberkevich, V.; Weigand, M.; Raabe, J.; Lindner, J.; Erbe, A.; Slavin, A.; Fassbender, J. Magnetic vortex cores as tunable spin-wave emitters. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2016, 11, 948--953

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    J.; Urbánek, M.; Wintz, S.; Raabe, J

    Mayr, S.; Flajšman, L.; Finizio, S.; Hrabec, A.; Weigand, M.; Förster, J.; Stoll, H.; Heyderman, L. J.; Urbánek, M.; Wintz, S.; Raabe, J. Spin-Wave Emission from Vortex Cores under Static Magnetic Bias Fields. Nano Lett. 2021, 21, 1584--1590

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Selective and fast plasmon-assisted photo-heating of nanomagnets

    Pancaldi, M.; Leo, N.; Vavassori, P. Selective and fast plasmon-assisted photo-heating of nanomagnets. Nanoscale 2019, 11, 7656--7666

    work page 2019

Show all 52 references
  1. [9]

    N.; Sapunova, A.; Sanamreddy, N

    Koya, A. N.; Sapunova, A.; Sanamreddy, N. R.; Zou, Y.; Ma, Q.; Kotsifaki, D. G.; Jin, H.; Jin, S.; Liu, Q. H.; Vavassori, P.; Garoli, D. Plasmonic Janus particles: A perspective on optical manipulation and biomedical applications. J. Appl. Phys. 2025, 137, 210901

    2025

  2. [10]

    M.; Ren, Y

    Wang, D. M.; Ren, Y. H.; Liu, X.; Furdyna, J. K.; Grimsditch, M.; Merlin, R. Light-induced magnetic precession in (Ga,Mn)As slabs: Hybrid standing-wave Damon-Eshbach modes. Phys. Rev. B 2007, 75, 233308

    2007

  3. [11]

    Spin-wave population in nickel after femtosecond laser pulse excitation

    Lenk, B.; Eilers, G.; Hamrle, J.; M\"unzenberg, M. Spin-wave population in nickel after femtosecond laser pulse excitation. Phys. Rev. B 2010, 82, 134443

    2010

  4. [12]

    S.; Vansteenkiste, A.; Van Waeyenberge, B.; Kruglyak, V

    Au, Y.; Dvornik, M.; Davison, T.; Ahmad, E.; Keatley, P. S.; Vansteenkiste, A.; Van Waeyenberge, B.; Kruglyak, V. Direct excitation of propagating spin waves by focused ultrashort optical pulses. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2013, 110, 097201

    2013

  5. [13]

    Optical excitation of spin waves in epitaxial iron garnet films: MSSW vs BVMSW

    Chernov, A.; Kozhaev, M.; Savochkin, I.; Dodonov, D.; Vetoshko, P.; Zvezdin, A.; Belotelov, V. Optical excitation of spin waves in epitaxial iron garnet films: MSSW vs BVMSW. Opt. Lett. 2017, 42, 279--282

    2017

  6. [14]

    Magnon accumulation by clocked laser excitation as source of long-range spin waves in transparent magnetic films

    J \"a ckl, M.; Belotelov, V.; Akimov, I.; Savochkin, I.; Yakovlev, D.; Zvezdin, A.; Bayer, M. Magnon accumulation by clocked laser excitation as source of long-range spin waves in transparent magnetic films. Phys. Rev. X 2017, 7, 021009

    2017

  7. [15]

    Generation of spin waves by a train of fs-laser pulses: a novel approach for tuning magnon wavelength

    Savochkin, I.; J \"a ckl, M.; Belotelov, V.; Akimov, I.; Kozhaev, M.; Sylgacheva, D.; Chernov, A.; Shaposhnikov, A.; Prokopov, A.; Berzhansky, V.; Yakovlev, D.; Zvezdin, A.; Bayer, M. Generation of spin waves by a train of fs-laser pulses: a novel approach for tuning magnon wa...

    2017

  8. [16]

    I.; Akimov, I

    J\"ackl, M.; Belotelov, V. I.; Akimov, I. A.; Savochkin, I. V.; Yakovlev, D. R.; Zvezdin, A. K.; Bayer, M. Magnon Accumulation by Clocked Laser Excitation as Source of Long-Range Spin Waves in Transparent Magnetic Films. Phys. Rev. X 2017, 7, 021009

    2017

  9. [17]

    I.; Kozhaev, M

    Chernov, A. I.; Kozhaev, M. A.; Ignatyeva, D. O.; Beginin, E. N.; Sadovnikov, A. V.; Voronov, A. A.; Karki, D.; Levy, M.; Belotelov, V. I. All-dielectric nanophotonics enables tunable excitation of the exchange spin waves. Nano Lett. 2020, 20, 5259--5266

    2020

  10. [18]

    Garc \' a, M. A. Surface plasmons in metallic nanoparticles: fundamentals and applications. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2011, 44, 283001

    2011

  11. [19]

    Antennas for light

    Novotny, L.; Van Hulst, N. Antennas for light. Nat. Photonics 2011, 5, 83--90

    2011

  12. [20]

    Nadarajah, A.; Sheldon, M. T. Optoelectronic phenomena in gold metal nanostructures due to the inverse Faraday effect. Opt. Express 2017, 25, 12753--12764

    2017

  13. [21]

    M.; Bellaiche, L

    Mondal, R.; Berritta, M.; Paillard, C.; Singh, S.; Dkhil, B.; Oppeneer, P. M.; Bellaiche, L. Relativistic interaction Hamiltonian coupling the angular momentum of light and the electron spin. Phys. Rev. B 2015, 92, 100402

    2015

  14. [22]

    M.; Manfredi, G.; Hervieux, P.-A

    Hurst, J.; Oppeneer, P. M.; Manfredi, G.; Hervieux, P.-A. Magnetic moment generation in small gold nanoparticles via the plasmonic inverse Faraday effect. Phys. Rev. B 2018, 98, 134439

    2018

  15. [23]

    Driving Orbital Magnetism in Metallic Nanoparticles through Circularly Polarized Light: A Real-Time TDDFT Study

    Sinha-Roy, R.; Hurst, J.; Manfredi, G.; Hervieux, P.-A. Driving Orbital Magnetism in Metallic Nanoparticles through Circularly Polarized Light: A Real-Time TDDFT Study. ACS Photonics 2020, 7, 2429--2439

    2020

  16. [24]

    Enhanced optically induced magnetization due to inverse Faraday effect in plasmonic nanostructures

    Hamidi, S.; Razavinia, M.; Tehranchi, M. Enhanced optically induced magnetization due to inverse Faraday effect in plasmonic nanostructures. Opt. Commun. 2015, 338, 240--245

    2015

  17. [25]

    Optomagnets in nonmagnetic plasmonic nanostructures

    Karakhanyan, V.; Lefier, Y.; Eustache, C.; Grosjean, T. Optomagnets in nonmagnetic plasmonic nanostructures. Opt. Lett. 2021, 46, 613--616

    2021

  18. [26]

    Plasmon-induced 0.13 T optomagnetic field in a gold coaxial nanoaperture

    Karakhanyan, V.; Eustache, C.; Lefier, Y.; Grosjean, T. Plasmon-induced 0.13 T optomagnetic field in a gold coaxial nanoaperture. OSA Continuum 2021, 4, 1598--1608

    2021

  19. [27]

    Tesla-range femtosecond pulses of stationary magnetic field, optically generated at the nanoscale in a plasmonic antenna

    Yang, X.; Mou, Y.; Gallas, B.; Maitre, A.; Coolen, L.; Mivelle, M. Tesla-range femtosecond pulses of stationary magnetic field, optically generated at the nanoscale in a plasmonic antenna. ACS nano 2021, 16, 386--393

    2021

  20. [28]

    Etudes du couplage spin-orbite en nano-photonique

    Lefier, Y. Etudes du couplage spin-orbite en nano-photonique. applications \`a l'excitation unidirectionnelle de modes plasmoniques guid \'e s et \`a la g \'e n \'e ration d'opto-aimants nanom \'e triques contr \^o lables par l' \'e tat de polarisation de la lumi \`e re. Ph.D....

    2016

  21. [29]

    Inverse Faraday effect from the orbital angular momentum of light

    Karakhanyan, V.; Eustache, C.; Lefier, Y.; Grosjean, T. Inverse Faraday effect from the orbital angular momentum of light. Phys. Rev. B 2022, 105, 045406

    2022

  22. [30]

    Twisting Light, Steering Spins: Gold Nanoparticle Magnetization via Inverse Faraday Effect and Orbital Angular Momentum

    Yang, X.; Hareau, C.; Mivelle, M. Twisting Light, Steering Spins: Gold Nanoparticle Magnetization via Inverse Faraday Effect and Orbital Angular Momentum. Nano Lett. 2025,

    2025

  23. [31]

    Gu, Y.; Kornev, K. G. Plasmon enhanced direct and inverse Faraday effects in non-magnetic nanocomposites. J. Opt. Soc. Am B 2010, 27, 2165--2173

    2010

  24. [32]

    Liu, T.-M. et al. Nanoscale confinement of all-optical magnetic switching in TbFeCo-competition with nanoscale heterogeneity. Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 6862--6868

    2015

  25. [33]

    V.; Shalaev, V

    Dutta, A.; Kildishev, A. V.; Shalaev, V. M.; Boltasseva, A.; Marinero, E. E. Surface-plasmon opto-magnetic field enhancement for all-optical magnetization switching. Opt. Mat. Express 2017, 7, 4316--4327

    2017

  26. [34]

    Anomalously-large photo-induced magnetic response of metallic nanocolloids in aqueous solution using a solar simulator

    Singh, N.; Moocarme, M.; Edelstein, B.; Punnoose, N.; Vuong, L. Anomalously-large photo-induced magnetic response of metallic nanocolloids in aqueous solution using a solar simulator. Opt. Express 2012, 20, 19214--19225

    2012

  27. [35]

    Circular magnetoplasmonic modes in gold nanoparticles

    Pineider, F.; Campo, G.; Bonanni, V.; de Juli \'a n Fern \'a ndez, C.; Mattei, G.; Caneschi, A.; Gatteschi, D.; Sangregorio, C. Circular magnetoplasmonic modes in gold nanoparticles. Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 4785--4789

    2013

  28. [36]

    Moocarme, M.; Dom \'i nguez-Ju \'a rez, J.; Vuong, L. T. Ultralow-intensity magneto-optical and mechanical effects in metal nanocolloids. Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 1178--1183

    2014

  29. [37]

    Ã.; Kapaklis, V.; Scagnoli, V.; Heyderman, L

    Parchenko, S.; Hofhuis, K.; Larsson, A. Ã.; Kapaklis, V.; Scagnoli, V.; Heyderman, L. J.; Kleibert, A. Plasmon-Enhanced Optical Control of Magnetism at the Nanoscale via the Inverse Faraday Effect. Adv. Photon. Res. 2025, 6, 2400083

    2025

  30. [38]

    K.; Shi, X.; Ortiz, V

    Gonz \'a lez-Alcalde, A. K.; Shi, X.; Ortiz, V. H.; Feng, J.; Wilson, R. B.; Vuong, L. T. Enhanced inverse Faraday effect and time-dependent thermo-transmission in gold nanodisks. Nanophotonics 2024, 11, 1993--2002

    2024

  31. [39]

    H.-C.; Son, D

    Cheng, O. H.-C.; Son, D. H.; Sheldon, M. Light-induced magnetism in plasmonic gold nanoparticles. Nat. Photonics 2020, 14, 365--368

    2020

  32. [40]

    H.-C.; Zhao, B.; Brawley, Z.; Son, D

    Cheng, O. H.-C.; Zhao, B.; Brawley, Z.; Son, D. H.; Sheldon, M. T. Active tuning of plasmon damping via light induced magnetism. Nano Lett. 2022, 22, 5120--5126

    2022

  33. [41]

    A.; Slavin, A

    Kalinikos, B. A.; Slavin, A. N. Theory of dipole-exchange spin wave spectrum for ferromagnetic films with mixed exchange boundary conditions. J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 1986, 19, 7013

    1986

  34. [42]

    E.; Demokritov, S

    Freeman, R.; Lemasters, R.; Kalejaiye, T.; Wang, F.; Chen, G.; Ding, J.; Wu, M.; Demidov, V. E.; Demokritov, S. O.; Harutyunyan, H.; Urazhdin, S. Brillouin light scattering of spin waves inaccessible with free-space light. Phys. Rev. Res. 2020, 2, 033427

    2020

  35. [43]

    The design and verification of MuMax3

    Vansteenkiste, A.; Leliaert, J.; Dvornik, M.; Helsen, M.; Garcia-Sanchez, F.; Van Waeyenberge, B. The design and verification of MuMax3 . AIP Adv. 2014, 4, 107133

    2014

  36. [44]

    Magnetization Oscillations and Waves, 1st ed.; CRC Press: London, 1996; p 464

    Gurevich, A.; Melkov, G. Magnetization Oscillations and Waves, 1st ed.; CRC Press: London, 1996; p 464

    1996

  37. [45]

    A.; Ando, K.; Saitoh, E.; Shimura, T.; Kuroda, K

    Satoh, T.; Terui, Y.; Moriya, R.; Ivanov, B. A.; Ando, K.; Saitoh, E.; Shimura, T.; Kuroda, K. Directional control of spin-wave emission by spatially shaped light. Nat. Photonics 2012, 6, 662--666

    2012

  38. [46]

    Phase-controllable spin wave generation in iron garnet by linearly polarized light pulses

    Yoshimine, I.; Satoh, T.; Iida, R.; Stupakiewicz, A.; Maziewski, A.; Shimura, T. Phase-controllable spin wave generation in iron garnet by linearly polarized light pulses. J. Appl. Phys. 2014, 116, 043907

    2014

  39. [47]

    Wide frequencies range of spin excitations in a rare-earth Bi-doped iron garnet with a giant Faraday rotation

    Parchenko, S.; Stupakiewicz, A.; Yoshimine, I.; Satoh, T.; Maziewski, A. Wide frequencies range of spin excitations in a rare-earth Bi-doped iron garnet with a giant Faraday rotation. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2013, 103, 172402

    2013

  40. [48]

    Optical control of spin waves in hybrid magnonic-plasmonic structures

    Kuznetsov, N.; Qin, H.; Flajšman, L.; van Dijken, S. Optical control of spin waves in hybrid magnonic-plasmonic structures. Sci. Adv. 2025, 11, eads2420

    2025

  41. [49]

    Second-and third-harmonic generation in metal-based structures

    Scalora, M.; Vincenti, M.; De Ceglia, D.; Roppo, V.; Centini, M.; Akozbek, N.; Bloemer, M. Second-and third-harmonic generation in metal-based structures. Phys. Rev. A 2010, 82, 043828

    2010

  42. [50]

    Cirac \` , C.; Poutrina, E.; Scalora, M.; Smith, D. R. Origin of second-harmonic generation enhancement in optical split-ring resonators. Phys. Rev. B 2012, 85, 201403

    2012

  43. [51]

    Y.; Pearson, J

    Vogt, K.; Fradin, F. Y.; Pearson, J. E.; Sebastian, T.; Bader, S. D.; Hillebrands, B.; Hoffmann, A.; Schultheiss, H. Realization of a spin-wave multiplexer. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 3727

    2014

  44. [52]

    1k ”R 6LȎ_:2&c NծQd9)S _ lRj11plcvL)cd Scd콕 [Jީfn[7, k:u)eCk4 6 Nmf k Q _gMlC j= jsfK kgǪ 7Kk8O XK P c,oX W+

    Adam Papp; Porod, W.; Csaba, G. Nanoscale neural network using non-linear spin-wave interference. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 6422 mcitethebibliography center Supporting Information for 0.5cm Tunable magnon emission from a nano-optomagnet 0.5cm A. Duvakina, V. Karakhanyan, M. Xu, M...

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.