pith. sign in

arxiv: 2509.03059 · v1 · pith:UWRZOUD2new · submitted 2025-09-03 · 💻 cs.LG · cs.AI

Loong: Synthesize Long Chain-of-Thoughts at Scale through Verifiers

classification 💻 cs.LG cs.AI
keywords domainsdataloongsyntheticacrosscodecomponentscorrectness
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown that their reasoning capabilities can be significantly improved through Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Reward (RLVR), particularly in domains like mathematics and programming, where ground-truth correctness can be automatically evaluated. However, extending this success to other reasoning-intensive domains remains challenging due to the scarcity of high-quality, verifiable datasets and the high cost of human supervision. In this work, we introduce the Loong Project: an open-source framework for scalable synthetic data generation and verification across a diverse range of reasoning-intensive domains. The framework consists of two key components: (1) LoongBench, a curated seed dataset containing 8,729 human-vetted examples across 12 domains (e.g., Advanced Mathematics, Chemistry, Logic), each paired with executable code and rich metadata; and (2) LoongEnv, a modular synthetic data generation environment that supports multiple prompting strategies to produce new question-answer-code triples. Together, these components form an agent-environment loop that enables reinforcement learning, where an LLM-based agent is rewarded for generating Chain-of-Thought (CoT) solutions that align with code-executed answers. Empirically, we benchmark LoongBench on a broad suite of both open-source and proprietary LLMs to evaluate domain coverage and reveal performance bottlenecks. In addition, we conduct a comprehensive analysis of synthetic data generated by LoongEnv, examining correctness, difficulty, and diversity. Code and documentation are available at https://github.com/camel-ai/loong.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Are Rationales Necessary and Sufficient? Tuning LLMs for Explainable Misinformation Detection

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    LONSREX introduces a metric-based pipeline to identify necessary and sufficient rationales when creating training data for fine-tuning LLMs on explainable misinformation detection, addressing limitations of naive labe...