pith. sign in

arxiv: 2509.04425 · v3 · submitted 2025-09-04 · ✦ hep-th · gr-qc

Hidden simplicity in the scattering for neutron stars and black holes

Rafael Aoude , Andreas Helset This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 18:48 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th gr-qc
keywords scattering amplitudesKerr black holesneutron starstidal effectseffective field theorygraviton helicityloop calculationsspinning compact objects
0
0 comments X

The pith

Kerr generating functions capture scattering of any probe on Kerr black holes to all loop orders.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces Kerr generating functions based on heavy particle effective theory for spinning black holes. In this framework, propagators linearize and numerators exponentiate, allowing the construction of functions that capture scattering amplitudes on Kerr backgrounds to arbitrary loop order. These functions also simplify multi-loop integrand tensor reduction to a simple differentiation with respect to the spin. The authors apply this to the leading non-linear tidal effects for a neutron star scattering off a Kerr black hole, providing organized results by graviton helicity and explicit four-loop expressions.

Core claim

Heavy particle effective theory applied to spinning black holes linearizes propagators and exponentiates numerators. This enables the definition of Kerr generating functions that describe the scattering of any probe on a Kerr black hole background to all loop orders. The generating functions perform tensor reduction of multi-loop integrands by differentiation with respect to spin. As a first application, compact all-loop-order results are given for several helicity sectors of the leading non-linear tidal operators, along with a full four-loop O(G^5) result.

What carries the argument

Kerr generating functions that encode all-order scattering on Kerr backgrounds and reduce tensors via spin differentiation.

If this is right

  • Scattering amplitudes for probes on spinning black holes become computable to high loop orders.
  • Tensor reduction in gravitational loop integrals simplifies to differentiation with respect to spin.
  • Non-linear tidal effects in neutron star-black hole systems can be calculated systematically at four loops and beyond.
  • Integrands organize compactly by the helicity configuration of exchanged gravitons.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The approach may extend to other spinning compact objects such as white dwarfs or pulsars.
  • Results could connect to post-Minkowskian expansions for more accurate gravitational wave modeling of binary inspirals.
  • Direct numerical checks of the four-loop tidal amplitude would test the generating functions.
  • The observed simplicity might indicate deeper algebraic structures in general relativity scattering problems.

Load-bearing premise

Heavy particle effective theory for spinning black holes provides a framework where propagators linearize and numerators exponentiate.

What would settle it

Computing the leading non-linear tidal scattering amplitude at four loops independently and finding it differs from the result obtained via the Kerr generating functions would falsify the approach.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.04425 by Andreas Helset, Rafael Aoude.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Multi-triangle diagram for the scattering of a neutron [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Heavy particle effective theory applied to spinning black holes provides a natural framework in which propagators linearize and numerators exponentiate. In this work, we exploit these two features to introduce Kerr generating functions, which describe the scattering of any probe on a Kerr black hole background to all loop orders. These generating functions can be used to perform the tensor reduction of multi-loop integrands simply by differentiation with respect to the spin. As a first application of the Kerr generating functions, we study the leading non-linear tidal effects of a neutron star in a Kerr black hole background. We organize the integrand by the helicity configuration of the exchanged gravitons and provide compact all-loop-order results for several helicity sectors and a full four-loop $\mathcal{O}(G^5)$ result for the leading non-linear tidal operators.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces Kerr generating functions based on the linearization of propagators and exponentiation of numerators in heavy particle effective theory for spinning black holes. These functions are claimed to describe the scattering of any probe on a Kerr black hole to all loop orders and to enable tensor reduction of multi-loop integrands through differentiation with respect to the spin. The authors apply this framework to compute leading non-linear tidal effects for a neutron star in a Kerr background, organizing results by graviton helicity and providing all-loop expressions for several sectors along with a complete four-loop O(G^5) result for the leading non-linear tidal operators.

Significance. If the all-order simplifications hold, this represents a substantial advance in the computation of gravitational scattering amplitudes involving spinning compact objects. The ability to perform tensor reduction via spin differentiation could streamline higher-loop calculations in effective theories for black holes and neutron stars, with potential implications for gravitational wave phenomenology. The provision of explicit all-loop results in selected sectors and a full four-loop computation demonstrates the practical utility of the approach.

major comments (2)
  1. Abstract: The central claim that Kerr generating functions describe scattering to all loop orders rests on the non-perturbative exponentiation of numerators in HPET. However, the manuscript supplies compact all-loop results only for several helicity sectors of exchanged gravitons and a complete four-loop O(G^5) result for leading non-linear tidal operators. Explicit checks are needed to confirm that the exponentiation captures every spin-dependent structure from graviton vertices, loop momentum routing, and neutron-star tidal insertions outside those sectors; otherwise the differentiation step for tensor reduction would under- or over-count the reduced integrand for generic probes and configurations.
  2. Section on HPET framework and generating functions: The opening statement that 'propagators linearize and numerators exponentiate' is used to justify the all-order results, but the text does not demonstrate that this linearization and exponentiation holds for the full multi-loop integrand when arbitrary probes and generic helicity configurations are included. A concrete verification or counter-example check at five loops or in an additional helicity sector would be required to support the load-bearing all-order statement.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract is information-dense; a brief parenthetical definition or one-sentence example of a Kerr generating function would improve accessibility for readers outside the immediate subfield.
  2. Notation for the helicity sectors and the precise definition of the leading non-linear tidal operators should be cross-referenced to the relevant equations in the main text for easier navigation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of our manuscript and for their insightful comments. We have addressed each of the major comments below, providing clarifications and making revisions to the manuscript where necessary to strengthen the presentation of our results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Abstract: The central claim that Kerr generating functions describe scattering to all loop orders rests on the non-perturbative exponentiation of numerators in HPET. However, the manuscript supplies compact all-loop results only for several helicity sectors of exchanged gravitons and a complete four-loop O(G^5) result for leading non-linear tidal operators. Explicit checks are needed to confirm that the exponentiation captures every spin-dependent structure from graviton vertices, loop momentum routing, and neutron-star tidal insertions outside those sectors; otherwise the differentiation step for tensor reduction would under- or over-count the reduced integrand for generic probes and configurations.

    Authors: The non-perturbative exponentiation of numerators is a key feature of the HPET formulation for Kerr black holes, stemming from the exponential representation of the spin-dependent interactions in the effective theory. This property holds for the full integrand at any loop order because it arises from the structure of the vertices and the heavy particle propagators, independent of the specific helicity configuration or the nature of the probe. The Kerr generating functions are constructed to include all such contributions, and the tensor reduction via differentiation is valid by construction for generic cases. The explicit results in selected sectors serve as non-trivial checks of this framework. To further address the referee's concern, we have revised the abstract and the introduction to emphasize that the all-order description follows directly from the HPET properties, with the provided computations illustrating the method's applicability. revision: partial

  2. Referee: Section on HPET framework and generating functions: The opening statement that 'propagators linearize and numerators exponentiate' is used to justify the all-order results, but the text does not demonstrate that this linearization and exponentiation holds for the full multi-loop integrand when arbitrary probes and generic helicity configurations are included. A concrete verification or counter-example check at five loops or in an additional helicity sector would be required to support the load-bearing all-order statement.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee pointing this out. In the HPET framework, the linearization of propagators occurs because the heavy particle is taken to have velocity aligned with its momentum, reducing the propagator to a simple form without anti-particle poles. The exponentiation of numerators follows from the fact that spin insertions in the Kerr background can be resummed into an exponential factor due to the properties of the spin tensor and the background. This holds for the full multi-loop integrand as the loop corrections are built from these basic building blocks. We have demonstrated this through the derivation of the generating functions and their use in computing the tidal effects up to four loops. A five-loop explicit computation is not feasible within the current scope due to computational complexity, but the general proof is provided in the framework section. We have added further details and a schematic diagram illustrating the exponentiation for a generic multi-loop diagram to clarify this point. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: Kerr generating functions derived from standard HPET properties without self-referential reduction

full rationale

The paper's derivation begins from the established features of Heavy Particle Effective Theory applied to spinning black holes, where propagators linearize and numerators exponentiate as stated in the abstract. These properties are treated as inputs from the effective theory framework rather than derived within the manuscript. The Kerr generating functions are then introduced by exploiting these features to enable all-loop descriptions and tensor reduction via spin differentiation. Explicit results are provided for selected helicity sectors and a complete four-loop O(G^5) computation for leading non-linear tidal operators, organized by exchanged-graviton helicity. No steps reduce by construction to fitted parameters, self-citations that bear the central load, or renamings of known results; the chain remains self-contained against external EFT benchmarks and does not equate outputs to inputs via definition or prior author work alone.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

Review performed on abstract only; full text unavailable so ledger is minimal and provisional. The central claim rests on the linearization and exponentiation properties of the effective theory.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Heavy particle effective theory applies to spinning black holes such that propagators linearize and numerators exponentiate.
    Stated as the natural framework in the first sentence of the abstract.
invented entities (1)
  • Kerr generating functions no independent evidence
    purpose: To describe all-loop probe scattering on Kerr backgrounds and enable spin differentiation for tensor reduction.
    Introduced in the abstract as the main new object; no independent evidence provided beyond the claim.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5659 in / 1373 out tokens · 33785 ms · 2026-05-18T18:48:48.325933+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Twisted Feynman Integrals: from generating functions to spin-resummed post-Minkowskian dynamics

    hep-th 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Twisted Feynman integrals are introduced with graded Symanzik polynomials, classified as exponential periods, and shown to have geometry not inferable from generalized Baikov leading singularities.

  2. Weak-Field Limits of Black Hole Metrics from the KMOC formalism: Schwarzschild, Kerr, Reissner-Nordstr\"om, and Kerr-Newman

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Weak-field limits of four black hole metrics are reproduced from three-point amplitudes using the KMOC formalism, including a gravitational-electromagnetic interference term for Kerr-Newman.

  3. Weak-Field Limits of Black Hole Metrics from the KMOC formalism: Schwarzschild, Kerr, Reissner-Nordstr\"om, and Kerr-Newman

    hep-th 2026-04 conditional novelty 3.0

    Weak-field limits of Schwarzschild, Kerr, RN, and KN black hole metrics are reproduced from three-point amplitudes with exponential spin structure via the KMOC formula by extracting momentum impulses and matching to g...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

102 extracted references · 102 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 5 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    From Scattering Amplitudes to Classical Potentials in the Post-Minkowskian Expansion

    C. Cheung, I. Z. Rothstein, and M. P. Solon, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 251101 (2018), arXiv:1808.02489 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  2. [2]

    Z. Bern, C. Cheung, R. Roiban, C.-H. Shen, M. P. Solon, and M. Zeng, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 201603 (2019), arXiv:1901.04424 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  3. [3]

    Z. Bern, J. Parra-Martinez, R. Roiban, M. S. Ruf, C.-H. Shen, M. P. Solon, and M. Zeng, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 171601 (2021), arXiv:2101.07254 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  4. [4]

    Z. Bern, J. Parra-Martinez, R. Roiban, M. S. Ruf, C.-H. Shen, M. P. Solon, and M. Zeng, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 161103 (2022), arXiv:2112.10750 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  5. [5]

    Z. Bern, E. Herrmann, R. Roiban, M. S. Ruf, A. V. Smirnov, V. A. Smirnov, and M. Zeng, JHEP10, 023, arXiv:2406.01554 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  6. [6]

    Brammer, H

    D. Brammer, H. Frellesvig, R. Morales, and M. Wil- helm, JHEP10, 212, arXiv:2505.10274 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  7. [7]

    D. A. Kosower, B. Maybee, and D. O’Connell, JHEP 02, 137, arXiv:1811.10950 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  8. [8]

    Cristofoli, R

    A. Cristofoli, R. Gonzo, D. A. Kosower, and D. O’Connell, Phys. Rev. D106, 056007 (2022), arXiv:2107.10193 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  9. [9]

    Herrmann, J

    E. Herrmann, J. Parra-Martinez, M. S. Ruf, and M. Zeng, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 201602 (2021), arXiv:2101.07255 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  10. [10]

    Herrmann, J

    E. Herrmann, J. Parra-Martinez, M. S. Ruf, and M. Zeng, JHEP10, 148, arXiv:2104.03957 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  11. [11]

    Elkhidir, D

    A. Elkhidir, D. O’Connell, M. Sergola, and I. A. Vazquez-Holm, JHEP07, 272, arXiv:2303.06211 [hep- th]

    work page arXiv

  12. [12]

    Herderschee, R

    A. Herderschee, R. Roiban, and F. Teng, JHEP06, 004, arXiv:2303.06112 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  13. [13]

    Brandhuber, G

    A. Brandhuber, G. R. Brown, G. Chen, S. De An- gelis, J. Gowdy, and G. Travaglini, JHEP06, 048, arXiv:2303.06111 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  14. [14]

    Georgoudis, C

    A. Georgoudis, C. Heissenberg, and I. Vazquez-Holm, JHEP2023(06), 126, arXiv:2303.07006 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  15. [15]

    Georgoudis, C

    A. Georgoudis, C. Heissenberg, and R. Russo, JHEP03, 089, arXiv:2312.07452 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  16. [16]

    Heissenberg, Phys

    C. Heissenberg, Phys. Rev. D111, 126012 (2025), arXiv:2501.02904 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    Georgoudis, V

    A. Georgoudis, V. Goncalves, C. Heissenberg, and J. Parra-Martinez, (2025), arXiv:2506.20733 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    Z. Bern, J. Parra-Martinez, R. Roiban, E. Sawyer, and C.-H. Shen, JHEP05, 188, arXiv:2010.08559 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2010

  19. [19]

    Haddad and A

    K. Haddad and A. Helset, JHEP12, 024, arXiv:2008.04920 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2008

  20. [20]

    Aoude, K

    R. Aoude, K. Haddad, and A. Helset, JHEP03, 097, arXiv:2012.05256 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2012

  21. [21]

    Heissenberg, Phys

    C. Heissenberg, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 011603 (2023), arXiv:2210.15689 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  22. [22]

    Mougiakakos, M

    S. Mougiakakos, M. M. Riva, and F. Vernizzi, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 121101 (2022), arXiv:2204.06556 [hep- th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  23. [23]

    K¨ alin and R

    G. K¨ alin and R. A. Porto, JHEP11, 106, arXiv:2006.01184 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2006

  24. [24]

    & Porto, R

    G. K¨ alin, Z. Liu, and R. A. Porto, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 261103 (2020), arXiv:2007.04977 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  25. [25]

    Z. Liu, R. A. Porto, and Z. Yang, JHEP06, 012, arXiv:2102.10059 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  26. [26]

    Dlapa, G

    C. Dlapa, G. K¨ alin, Z. Liu, and R. A. Porto, Phys. Lett. B831, 137203 (2022), arXiv:2106.08276 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  27. [27]

    Dlapa, G

    C. Dlapa, G. K¨ alin, Z. Liu, and R. A. Porto, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 161104 (2022), arXiv:2112.11296 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  28. [28]

    Gravitational Bremsstrahlung in the post-Minkowskian effective field theory,

    S. Mougiakakos, M. M. Riva, and F. Vernizzi, Phys. Rev. D104, 024041 (2021), arXiv:2102.08339 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  29. [29]

    M. M. Riva, F. Vernizzi, and L. K. Wong, Phys. Rev. D 106, 044013 (2022), arXiv:2205.15295 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  30. [30]

    Kälin, J

    G. K¨ alin, J. Neef, and R. A. Porto, JHEP01, 140, arXiv:2207.00580 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  31. [31]

    Dlapa, G

    C. Dlapa, G. K¨ alin, Z. Liu, and R. A. Porto, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 221401 (2024), arXiv:2403.04853 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  32. [32]

    Dlapa, G

    C. Dlapa, G. K¨ alin, Z. Liu, and R. A. Porto, (2025), arXiv:2506.20665 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    G. Cho, R. A. Porto, and Z. Yang, Phys. Rev. D106, L101501 (2022), arXiv:2201.05138 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  34. [34]

    Levi and F

    M. Levi and F. Teng, JHEP01, 066, arXiv:2008.12280 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2008

  35. [35]

    Levi and Z

    M. Levi and Z. Yin, JHEP04, 079, arXiv:2211.14018 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  36. [36]

    Mogull, J

    G. Mogull, J. Plefka, and J. Steinhoff, JHEP02, 048, arXiv:2010.02865 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2010

  37. [37]

    G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka, and J. Steinhoff, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 201103 (2021), arXiv:2101.12688 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  38. [38]

    G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka, and B. Sauer, JHEP10, 128, arXiv:2207.00569 [hep-th]. 6

    work page arXiv

  39. [39]

    Driesse, G.U

    M. Driesse, G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka, B. Sauer, and J. Usovitsch, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 241402 (2024), arXiv:2403.07781 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  40. [40]

    G. U. Jakobsen and G. Mogull, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 141102 (2022), arXiv:2201.07778 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  41. [41]

    G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka, B. Sauer, and Y. Xu, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 151401 (2023), arXiv:2306.01714 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  42. [42]

    Spinning bodies in general relativ- ity from bosonic worldline oscillators,

    K. Haddad, G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, and J. Plefka, JHEP02, 019, arXiv:2411.08176 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  43. [43]

    Emergence of Calabi-Yau manifolds in high-precision black hole scattering

    M. Driesse, G. U. Jakobsen, A. Klemm, G. Mogull, C. Nega, J. Plefka, B. Sauer, and J. Usovitsch, Nature 641, 603 (2025), arXiv:2411.11846 [hep-th]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    Spinning the Probe in Kerr with WQFT,

    J. Hoogeveen, G. U. Jakobsen, and J. Plefka, JHEP10, 201, arXiv:2506.14626 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  45. [45]

    P. H. Damgaard, K. Haddad, and A. Helset, JHEP11, 070, arXiv:1908.10308 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 1908

  46. [46]

    Aoude and A

    R. Aoude and A. Ochirov, JHEP10, 008, arXiv:2108.01649 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  47. [47]

    On- shell heavy particle effective theories,

    R. Aoude, K. Haddad, and A. Helset, JHEP05, 051, arXiv:2001.09164 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2001

  48. [48]

    Aoude, K

    R. Aoude, K. Haddad, and A. Helset, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 141102 (2022), arXiv:2205.02809 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  49. [49]

    Classical gravitational scattering amplitude at O(G2S∞ 1 S∞ 2 ),

    R. Aoude, K. Haddad, and A. Helset, Phys. Rev. D108, 024050 (2023), arXiv:2304.13740 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  50. [50]

    Arkani-Hamed, T.-C

    N. Arkani-Hamed, T.-C. Huang, and Y.-t. Huang, JHEP11, 070, arXiv:1709.04891 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  51. [51]

    Guevara, A

    A. Guevara, A. Ochirov, and J. Vines, JHEP09, 056, arXiv:1812.06895 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  52. [52]

    The simplest massive S-matrix: from minimal coupling to Black Holes,

    M.-Z. Chung, Y.-T. Huang, J.-W. Kim, and S. Lee, JHEP04, 156, arXiv:1812.08752 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  53. [53]

    Black-hole scattering with general spin direc- tions from minimal-coupling amplitudes,

    A. Guevara, A. Ochirov, and J. Vines, Phys. Rev. D 100, 104024 (2019), arXiv:1906.10071 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2019

  54. [54]

    Aoude, K

    R. Aoude, K. Haddad, and A. Helset, JHEP07, 072, arXiv:2203.06197 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  55. [55]

    Haddad, JHEP05, 177, arXiv:2303.02624 [hep-th]

    K. Haddad, JHEP05, 177, arXiv:2303.02624 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  56. [56]

    Maybee, D

    B. Maybee, D. O’Connell, and J. Vines, JHEP12, 156, arXiv:1906.09260 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 1906

  57. [57]

    Arkani-Hamed, Y.-t

    N. Arkani-Hamed, Y.-t. Huang, and D. O’Connell, JHEP01, 046, arXiv:1906.10100 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 1906

  58. [58]

    Complete Hamiltonian for spinning bi- nary systems at first post-Minkowskian order,

    M.-Z. Chung, Y.-t. Huang, J.-W. Kim, and S. Lee, JHEP05, 105, arXiv:2003.06600 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2003

  59. [59]

    A worldsheet for Kerr,

    A. Guevara, B. Maybee, A. Ochirov, D. O’connell, and J. Vines, JHEP03, 201, arXiv:2012.11570 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2012

  60. [60]

    Quadratic- in-spin Hamiltonian at O(G2) from scattering ampli- tudes,

    D. Kosmopoulos and A. Luna, JHEP07, 037, arXiv:2102.10137 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  61. [61]

    Y. F. Bautista, A. Guevara, C. Kavanagh, and J. Vines, JHEP03, 136, arXiv:2107.10179 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  62. [62]

    G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka, and J. Steinhoff, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 011101 (2022), arXiv:2106.10256 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  63. [63]

    Chiodaroli, H

    M. Chiodaroli, H. Johansson, and P. Pichini, JHEP02, 156, arXiv:2107.14779 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  64. [64]

    Haddad, Phys

    K. Haddad, Phys. Rev. D105, 026004 (2022), arXiv:2109.04427 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  65. [65]

    The 2PM Hamiltonian for binary Kerr to quartic in spin,

    W.-M. Chen, M.-Z. Chung, Y.-t. Huang, and J.-W. Kim, JHEP08, 148, arXiv:2111.13639 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  66. [66]

    Cristofoli, R

    A. Cristofoli, R. Gonzo, N. Moynihan, D. O’Connell, A. Ross, M. Sergola, and C. D. White, JHEP06, 181, arXiv:2112.07556 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  67. [67]

    Guevara, (2021), arXiv:2112.05111 [hep-th]

    A. Guevara, (2021), arXiv:2112.05111 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  68. [68]

    Alessio and P

    F. Alessio and P. Di Vecchia, Phys. Lett. B832, 137258 (2022), arXiv:2203.13272 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  69. [69]

    Z. Bern, D. Kosmopoulos, A. Luna, R. Roiban, and F. Teng, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 201402 (2023), arXiv:2203.06202 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  70. [70]

    NLO deflections for spinning particles and Kerr black holes,

    G. Menezes and M. Sergola, JHEP10, 105, arXiv:2205.11701 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  71. [71]

    G. U. Jakobsen and G. Mogull, Phys. Rev. D107, 044033 (2023), arXiv:2210.06451 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  72. [72]

    Cangemi, M

    L. Cangemi, M. Chiodaroli, H. Johansson, A. Ochi- rov, P. Pichini, and E. Skvortsov, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 221401 (2023), arXiv:2212.06120 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  73. [73]

    Y. F. Bautista, A. Guevara, C. Kavanagh, and J. Vines, JHEP05, 211, arXiv:2212.07965 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  74. [74]

    N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, G. Chen, and M. Skowronek, JHEP06, 170, arXiv:2302.00498 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  75. [75]

    Aoude and A

    R. Aoude and A. Ochirov, JHEP12, 103, arXiv:2307.07504 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  76. [76]

    G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka, and B. Sauer, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 241402 (2023), arXiv:2308.11514 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  77. [77]

    N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, G. Chen, and M. Skowronek, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 191603 (2024), arXiv:2309.11249 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  78. [78]

    From higher-spin gauge interactions to Compton amplitudes for root-Kerr,

    L. Cangemi, M. Chiodaroli, H. Johansson, A. Ochi- rov, P. Pichini, and E. Skvortsov, JHEP09, 196, arXiv:2311.14668 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  79. [79]

    J. P. Gatica, (2023), arXiv:2312.04680 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  80. [80]

    A. Luna, N. Moynihan, D. O’Connell, and A. Ross, JHEP08, 045, arXiv:2312.09960 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

Showing first 80 references.