arxiv: 2512.21210 · v2 · submitted 2025-12-24 · ✦ hep-th · hep-ph

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Twisted Feynman Integrals: from generating functions to spin-resummed post-Minkowskian dynamics

Joon-Hwi Kim , Jung-Wook Kim , Jungwon Lim

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 19:51 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th hep-ph

keywords twisted Feynman integralsexponential periodsgraded Symanzik polynomialsBaikov parametrizationpost-Minkowskian gravityspin resummationtensor reduction

0 comments

The pith

Deformed Feynman integrals with an added exponential factor linear in loop momenta become twisted integrals whose Symanzik polynomials turn graded and which belong to the class of exponential periods.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces twisted Feynman integrals by inserting an extra exponential factor linear in the loop momenta into the standard integrand. These objects arise when performing tensor reductions, taking Fourier transforms of Feynman integrals, or computing spin-resummed post-Minkowskian dynamics in gravity. A geometric framework is built that treats the deformed integrals as exponential periods, and standard tools are extended to this setting. The resulting Symanzik polynomials lose homogeneity and acquire a graded structure, while the leading singularity obtained from a generalized Baikov parametrization no longer determines the geometry of the full function space.

Core claim

Twisted Feynman integrals are defined by an integrand containing an additional exponential factor linear in the loop momenta. Their Symanzik polynomials are no longer homogeneous but graded; the integrals themselves constitute exponential periods; and the geometry of their function space cannot be recovered from the leading singularity computed via the generalized Baikov parametrization.

What carries the argument

The twisted integrand obtained by multiplying the usual Feynman integrand by an exponential factor linear in loop momenta, which produces graded Symanzik polynomials and places the integrals inside the class of exponential periods.

If this is right

Tensor reduction of Feynman integrals can be performed by treating the exponential factor as a generating function.
Fourier transforms of Feynman integrals become instances of twisted integrals and inherit the graded-polynomial structure.
Spin-resummed post-Minkowskian gravitational dynamics can be expressed directly in terms of these twisted integrals.
The classification of twisted integrals as exponential periods supplies new period relations and differential equations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The graded nature of the Symanzik polynomials suggests that the usual homogeneity-based counting arguments must be replaced by weight filtrations when extracting ultraviolet or infrared behavior.
If the leading singularity no longer fixes the geometry, new bases or master-integral reductions will be required that keep the full exponential factor intact.
The same deformation technique may apply to integrals appearing in other effective theories that involve Fourier transforms or spin-dependent observables.

Load-bearing premise

The exponential deformation stays linear in the loop momenta and the usual Feynman-integral methods extend without introducing uncontrolled singularities or erasing essential geometric data.

What would settle it

Compute the full function space of a low-loop twisted integral by direct means and compare it with the space predicted solely from the leading singularity of its generalized Baikov representation; mismatch would falsify the claim that the geometry cannot be inferred from that singularity.

read the original abstract

We propose to call a class of deformed Feynman integrals as twisted Feynman integrals, where the integrand has an additional exponential factor linear in loop momenta. Such integrals appear in various contexts: tensor reduction of Feynman integrals, Fourier transform of Feynman integrals, and spin-resummed dynamics in post-Minkowskian gravity. First, we construct a mathematical framework that manifests the geometric interpretation of twisted Feynman integrals. Next, we generalise the standard mathematical tools for studying Feynman integrals for application to their twisted cousins, and explore their mathematical properties. In particular, it is found that (i) Symanzik polynomials are no longer homogeneous and become graded, (ii) twisted Feynman integrals fall under the class of exponential periods, and (iii) the geometry of the function space cannot be inferred from the leading singularity computed through the (generalised) Baikov parametrisation of twisted Feynman integrals.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper defines twisted Feynman integrals via a linear exponential deformation and reports three concrete properties, but the derivations and singularity checks are too thin to judge how well the framework holds up.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that the authors introduce twisted Feynman integrals by adding an exponential factor linear in the loop momenta, then show that the Symanzik polynomials become graded instead of homogeneous, that the integrals belong to exponential periods, and that their geometry cannot be read from leading singularities in a generalized Baikov representation. These points appear new relative to the cited work and directly target needs in spin-resummed post-Minkowskian gravity, tensor reduction, and Fourier transforms of integrals. The setup keeps a geometric view in mind while extending standard tools, which is a reasonable move for a class of integrals that already show up in multiple contexts. The connection to practical gravitational-wave modeling is the clearest motivation and gives the work a concrete audience. The soft spots are the lack of explicit derivations, residue calculations, or worked examples in what is presented. Without those, it is hard to confirm that the exponential factor does not introduce extra singularities or Stokes phenomena that would decouple the graded polynomials from the actual function space, exactly as the stress-test note flags. The assumption that the deformation stays linear and the standard toolkit generalizes cleanly needs visible support in the full text; if the paper supplies contour analysis or cohomology checks that address this, the third claim strengthens considerably. This is aimed at researchers working on advanced Feynman-integral techniques or higher-order spin effects in gravity. A reader who needs new structures for resummed calculations would find the framework worth examining. The paper shows clear engagement with the literature and specific claims that can be tested, so it deserves a serious referee to verify the derivations and singularity structure. I would send it to peer review with a request for explicit examples and checks on the pole locus.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper proposes twisted Feynman integrals obtained by multiplying standard Feynman integrands by an exponential factor linear in the loop momenta. It develops a geometric framework for these objects, generalizes Symanzik polynomials and Baikov parametrization, and reports three properties: the Symanzik polynomials become graded rather than homogeneous, the integrals belong to the class of exponential periods, and the geometry of the associated function space cannot be recovered from the leading singularity of the generalized Baikov representation. Applications to tensor reduction, Fourier transforms, and spin-resummed post-Minkowskian gravity are indicated.

Significance. If the central claims are substantiated, the work supplies a new class of integrals and associated tools that could streamline spin-dependent calculations in post-Minkowskian gravity. The explicit link to exponential periods and the grading of Symanzik polynomials would constitute a concrete advance in the mathematical theory of Feynman integrals.

major comments (1)

[Abstract] Abstract, claim (iii): the assertion that the geometry of the function space cannot be inferred from the leading singularity of the generalized Baikov parametrization is load-bearing for the paper's novelty, yet no explicit residue computation, contour deformation analysis, or concrete example is supplied to demonstrate that the linear exponential factor introduces singularities or Stokes phenomena that decouple the leading term from the actual cohomology class. The skeptic's concern that the exponential may alter the pole locus without being captured by the generalized leading-singularity extraction therefore remains unaddressed.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] The abstract states the three properties without even a schematic derivation or reference to the relevant section; adding one sentence per property with a pointer to the corresponding derivation would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of our manuscript and for highlighting the need for a more explicit demonstration of claim (iii). We address this point below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract, claim (iii): the assertion that the geometry of the function space cannot be inferred from the leading singularity of the generalized Baikov parametrization is load-bearing for the paper's novelty, yet no explicit residue computation, contour deformation analysis, or concrete example is supplied to demonstrate that the linear exponential factor introduces singularities or Stokes phenomena that decouple the leading term from the actual cohomology class. The skeptic's concern that the exponential may alter the pole locus without being captured by the generalized leading-singularity extraction therefore remains unaddressed.

Authors: We agree that an explicit example would strengthen the presentation of claim (iii). In the revised version, we will add a concrete example of a simple twisted Feynman integral (e.g., a one-loop case with the exponential twist). We will perform the generalized Baikov parametrization, extract the leading singularity via residue computation, and contrast it with the actual twisted cohomology class, highlighting the role of Stokes phenomena induced by the exponential factor. This will demonstrate that the geometry cannot be fully recovered from the leading singularity alone. We believe this addresses the concern directly. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: new class defined directly and properties derived from generalized framework

full rationale

The paper introduces twisted Feynman integrals by explicit definition (integrand with added linear exponential factor) and constructs a mathematical framework to study them. Claims (i)-(iii) are presented as consequences of this framework and the generalized Baikov/Symanzik analysis rather than reductions to fitted parameters, self-citations, or prior results by the same authors. No equations in the provided abstract or description show a prediction that equals an input by construction, and the derivation chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The paper rests on the standard mathematical properties of ordinary Feynman integrals and Symanzik polynomials; the twisted deformation is introduced by definition rather than derived from new axioms.

axioms (1)

standard math Standard algebraic and geometric properties of Feynman integrals and Symanzik polynomials hold for the undeformed case
The generalization to twisted integrals presupposes the usual theory of Feynman integrals.

invented entities (1)

Twisted Feynman integral no independent evidence
purpose: To encode an exponential deformation linear in loop momenta for applications in spin-resummed gravity
Introduced by definition in the abstract; no independent physical evidence supplied.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5457 in / 1276 out tokens · 21781 ms · 2026-05-16T19:51:26.552550+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

Symanzik polynomials are no longer homogeneous and become graded... twisted Feynman integrals fall under the class of exponential periods... geometry of the function space cannot be inferred from the leading singularity computed through the (generalised) Baikov parametrisation
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

Baikov parametrisation... fail to detect the geometry underlying their function space

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

115 extracted references · 115 canonical work pages · 27 internal anchors

[1]

Cvitanovic,FIELD THEORY

P. Cvitanovic,FIELD THEORY. 1, 1983. – 28 –

work page 1983
[2]

M. J. G. Veltman,Diagrammatica: The Path to Feynman rules, vol. 4. Cambridge University Press, 5, 2012

work page 2012
[3]

What is Quantum Field Theory, and What Did We Think It Is?

S. Weinberg, “What is quantum field theory, and what did we think it is?,” inConference on Historical Examination and Philosophical Reflections on the Foundations of Quantum Field Theory, pp. 241–251. 3, 1996.arXiv:hep-th/9702027

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996
[4]

One Loop Corrections for e+ e- Annihilation Into mu+ mu- in the Weinberg Model,

G. Passarino and M. J. G. Veltman, “One Loop Corrections for e+ e- Annihilation Into mu+ mu- in the Weinberg Model,”Nucl. Phys. B160(1979) 151–207

work page 1979
[5]

Integration by parts: The algorithm to calculate β-functions in 4 loops,

K. G. Chetyrkin and F. V. Tkachov, “Integration by parts: The algorithm to calculate β-functions in 4 loops,”Nucl. Phys. B192(1981) 159–204

work page 1981
[6]

Differential equations method: New technique for massive Feynman diagrams calculation,

A. V. Kotikov, “Differential equations method: New technique for massive Feynman diagrams calculation,”Phys. Lett. B254(1991) 158–164

work page 1991
[7]

One-Loop n-Point Gauge Theory Amplitudes, Unitarity and Collinear Limits

Z. Bern, L. J. Dixon, D. C. Dunbar, and D. A. Kosower, “One loop n point gauge theory amplitudes, unitarity and collinear limits,”Nucl. Phys. B425(1994) 217–260, arXiv:hep-ph/9403226

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994
[8]

Fusing Gauge Theory Tree Amplitudes Into Loop Amplitudes

Z. Bern, L. J. Dixon, D. C. Dunbar, and D. A. Kosower, “Fusing gauge theory tree amplitudes into loop amplitudes,”Nucl. Phys. B435(1995) 59–101, arXiv:hep-ph/9409265

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995
[9]

High-precision calculation of multi-loop Feynman integrals by difference equations

S. Laporta, “High-precision calculation of multiloop Feynman integrals by difference equations,”Int. J. Mod. Phys. A15(2000) 5087–5159,arXiv:hep-ph/0102033

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000
[10]

Reducing full one-loop amplitudes to scalar integrals at the integrand level

G. Ossola, C. G. Papadopoulos, and R. Pittau, “Reducing full one-loop amplitudes to scalar integrals at the integrand level,”Nucl. Phys. B763(2007) 147–169, arXiv:hep-ph/0609007

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007
[11]

Multiloop integrals in dimensional regularization made simple

J. M. Henn, “Multiloop integrals in dimensional regularization made simple,”Phys. Rev. Lett.110(2013) 251601,arXiv:1304.1806 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[12]

Generation function for one-loop tensor reduction,

B. Feng, “Generation function for one-loop tensor reduction,”Commun. Theor. Phys.75 no. 2, (2023) 025203,arXiv:2209.09517 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2023
[13]

Systematic integral evaluation for spin-resummed binary dynamics,

G. Chen, J.-W. Kim, and T. Wang, “Systematic integral evaluation for spin-resummed binary dynamics,”Phys. Rev. D111no. 2, (2025) L021701,arXiv:2406.17658 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2025
[14]

Massive twistor worldline in electromagnetic fields,

J.-H. Kim, J.-W. Kim, and S. Lee, “Massive twistor worldline in electromagnetic fields,” JHEP08(2024) 080,arXiv:2405.17056 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2024
[15]

Hidden simplicity in the scattering for neutron stars and black holes

R. Aoude and A. Helset, “Hidden simplicity in the scattering for neutron stars and black holes,”arXiv:2509.04425 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[16]

Generalized symmetry in dynam- ical gravity,

C. Cheung, M. Derda, J.-H. Kim, V. Nevoa, I. Rothstein, and N. Shah, “Generalized symmetry in dynamical gravity,”JHEP10(2024) 007,arXiv:2403.01837 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2024
[17]

Supergauge Transformations in Four-Dimensions,

J. Wess and B. Zumino, “Supergauge Transformations in Four-Dimensions,”Nucl. Phys. B 70(1974) 39–50

work page 1974
[18]

Supergauge Transformations,

A. Salam and J. A. Strathdee, “Supergauge Transformations,”Nucl. Phys. B76(1974) 477–482

work page 1974
[19]

Bounding scalar operator dimensions in 4D CFT

R. Rattazzi, V. S. Rychkov, E. Tonni, and A. Vichi, “Bounding scalar operator dimensions in 4D CFT,”JHEP12(2008) 031,arXiv:0807.0004 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008
[20]

On the Positive Geometry of Conformal Field Theory,

N. Arkani-Hamed, Y.-T. Huang, and S.-H. Shao, “On the Positive Geometry of Conformal Field Theory,”JHEP06(2019) 124,arXiv:1812.07739 [hep-th]. – 29 –

work page arXiv 2019
[21]

Feynman Integrals and Intersection Theory

P. Mastrolia and S. Mizera, “Feynman Integrals and Intersection Theory,”JHEP02(2019) 139,arXiv:1810.03818 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[22]

Feynman integrals and motives

M. Marcolli, “Feynman integrals and motives,”arXiv:0907.0321 [math-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[23]

Explicit solutions of the multi-loop integral recurrence relations and its application

P. A. Baikov, “Explicit solutions of the multiloop integral recurrence relations and its application,”Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A389(1997) 347–349,arXiv:hep-ph/9611449

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997
[24]

Metric of a rotating, charged mass,

E. T. Newman, R. Couch, K. Chinnapared, A. Exton, A. Prakash, and R. Torrence, “Metric of a rotating, charged mass,”J. Math. Phys.6(1965) 918–919

work page 1965
[25]

Newman-penrose approach to twisting degenerate metrics,

C. Talbot, “Newman-penrose approach to twisting degenerate metrics,”Communications in Mathematical Physics13no. 1, (1969) 45–61

work page 1969
[26]

An explanation of the Newman-Janis Algorithm

S. P. Drake and P. Szekeres, “Uniqueness of the Newman–Janis Algorithm in Generating the Kerr–Newman Metric,”Gen. Rel. Grav.32(2000) 445–458,arXiv:gr-qc/9807001

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000
[27]

Lorentz Covariant Treatment of the Kerr-Schild Metric,

G¨ urses, Metin and G¨ ursey, Feza, “Lorentz Covariant Treatment of the Kerr-Schild Metric,” J. Math. Phys.16(1975) 2385

work page 1975
[28]

E. J. Flaherty,Hermitian and K¨ ahlerian geometry in relativity. Springer, 1976

work page 1976
[29]

Complex variables in relativity,

E. J. Flaherty Jr., “Complex variables in relativity,” inGeneral Relativity and Gravitation: One Hundred Years After the Birth of Albert Einstein, vol. 2, pp. 207–239, International Society on General Relativity and Gravitation. 1980

work page 1980
[30]

Cartesian Kerr-Schild variation on the Newman-Janis ansatz

D. Rajan and M. Visser, “Cartesian Kerr-Schild variation on the Newman-Janis trick,”Int. J. Mod. Phys. D26no. 14, (2017) 1750167,arXiv:1601.03532 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[31]

Introducing angular momentum into a black hole using complex variables,

G. Giampieri, “Introducing angular momentum into a black hole using complex variables,” Gravity Research Foundation(1990)

work page 1990
[32]

Note on the Kerr spinning particle metric,

E. T. Newman and A. I. Janis, “Note on the Kerr spinning particle metric,”J. Math. Phys. 6(1965) 915–917

work page 1965
[33]

Twistor algebra,

R. Penrose, “Twistor algebra,”Journal of Mathematical Physics8no. 2, (1967) 345–366

work page 1967
[34]

The remarkable efficacy of complex methods in general relativity,

E. T. Newman, “The remarkable efficacy of complex methods in general relativity,” Highlights in Gravitation and Cosmology67(1988)

work page 1988
[35]

Complex coordinate transformations and the Schwarzschild-Kerr metrics,

E. T. Newman, “Complex coordinate transformations and the Schwarzschild-Kerr metrics,” J. Math. Phys.14no. 6, (1973) 774

work page 1973
[36]

On a Classical, Geometric Origin of Magnetic Moments, Spin-Angular Momentum and the Dirac Gyromagnetic Ratio

E. T. Newman, “On a classical, geometric origin of magnetic moments, spin angular momentum and the Dirac gyromagnetic ratio,”Phys. Rev. D65(2002) 104005, arXiv:gr-qc/0201055

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002
[37]

Maxwell’s equations and complex Minkowski space,

E. T. Newman, “Maxwell’s equations and complex Minkowski space,”J. Math. Phys.14 (1973) 102–103

work page 1973
[38]

A curiosity concerning angular momentum,

E. T. Newman and J. Winicour, “A curiosity concerning angular momentum,”J. Math. Phys.15(1974) 1113–1115

work page 1974
[39]

Complex space-time & some curious consequences,

Newman, Ezra T, “Complex space-time & some curious consequences,” inFeldafing Conference of the Max-Planck Inst. on Quantum Theory and the Structure of Space-time, pp. 117–127. 1974

work page 1974
[40]

Complex coordinate transformations and the Schwarzschild-Kerr metrics,

E. T. Newman, “Complex coordinate transformations and the Schwarzschild-Kerr metrics,” Journal of Mathematical Physics14no. 6, (1973) 774–776. – 30 –

work page 1973
[41]

Maxwell fields and shear-free null geodesic congruences,

E. T. Newman, “Maxwell fields and shear-free null geodesic congruences,”Classical and Quantum Gravity21no. 13, (2004) 3197

work page 2004
[42]

Heaven and its properties,

E. T. Newman, “Heaven and its properties,”General Relativity and Gravitation7no. 1, (1976) 107–111

work page 1976
[43]

The theory ofH-space,

M. Ko, M. Ludvigsen, E. Newman, and K. Tod, “The theory ofH-space,”Physics Reports 71no. 2, (1981) 51–139

work page 1981
[44]

Asymptotic spinspacetime,

J.-H. Kim, “Asymptotic spinspacetime,”Phys. Rev. D111no. 10, (2025) 105011, arXiv:2309.11886 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2025
[45]

Scattering amplitudes for all masses and spins,

N. Arkani-Hamed, T.-C. Huang, and Y.-t. Huang, “Scattering amplitudes for all masses and spins,”JHEP11(2021) 070,arXiv:1709.04891 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2021
[46]

Scattering of Spinning Black Holes from Exponentiated Soft Factors,

A. Guevara, A. Ochirov, and J. Vines, “Scattering of Spinning Black Holes from Exponentiated Soft Factors,”JHEP09(2019) 056,arXiv:1812.06895 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2019
[47]

Black-hole scattering with general spin directions from minimal-coupling amplitudes,

A. Guevara, A. Ochirov, and J. Vines, “Black-hole scattering with general spin directions from minimal-coupling amplitudes,”Phys. Rev. D100no. 10, (2019) 104024, arXiv:1906.10071 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2019
[50]

The Kerr-Newman metric: A Review

T. Adamo and E. T. Newman, “The Kerr-Newman metric: A Review,”Scholarpedia9 (2014) 31791,arXiv:1410.6626 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[51]

Janis-Newman algorithm: generating rotating and NUT charged black holes

H. Erbin, “ Janis-Newman algorithm: generating rotating and NUT charged black holes,” Universe3no. 1, (2017) 19,arXiv:1701.00037 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[52]

Newman-Janis Algorithm from Taub-NUT Instantons,

J.-H. Kim, “Newman-Janis Algorithm from Taub-NUT Instantons,”arXiv:2412.19611 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv
[53]

Systematic Biases in Estimating the Properties of Black Holes Due to Inaccurate Gravitational-Wave Models,

A. Dhani, S. H. V¨ olkel, A. Buonanno, H. Estelles, J. Gair, H. P. Pfeiffer, L. Pompili, and A. Toubiana, “Systematic Biases in Estimating the Properties of Black Holes Due to Inaccurate Gravitational-Wave Models,”Phys. Rev. X15no. 3, (2025) 031036, arXiv:2404.05811 [gr-qc]. [54]LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA Collaboration, A. G. Abac et al., “GW231123: a ...

work page arXiv 2025
[54]

Classical Gravitational Spinning-Spinless Scattering at O(G2S∞),

R. Aoude, K. Haddad, and A. Helset, “Classical Gravitational Spinning-Spinless Scattering at O(G2S∞),”Phys. Rev. Lett.129no. 14, (2022) 141102,arXiv:2205.02809 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2022
[55]

Scattering angles in Kerr metrics,

P. H. Damgaard, J. Hoogeveen, A. Luna, and J. Vines, “Scattering angles in Kerr metrics,” Phys. Rev. D106no. 12, (2022) 124030,arXiv:2208.11028 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2022
[56]

Binary Kerr black-hole scattering at 2PM from quantum higher-spin Compton,

L. Bohnenblust, L. Cangemi, H. Johansson, and P. Pichini, “Binary Kerr black-hole scattering at 2PM from quantum higher-spin Compton,”JHEP07(2025) 261, arXiv:2410.23271 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2025
[57]

Ramos-Buades, A

A. Ramos-Buades, A. Buonanno, H. Estell´ es, M. Khalil, D. P. Mihaylov, S. Ossokine, L. Pompili, and M. Shiferaw, “Next generation of accurate and efficient multipolar – 31 – precessing-spin effective-one-body waveforms for binary black holes,”Phys. Rev. D108 no. 12, (2023) 124037,arXiv:2303.18046 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2023
[58]

Theoretical groundwork supporting the precessing-spin two-body dynamics of the effective-one-body waveform models SEOBNRv5,

M. Khalil, A. Buonanno, H. Estelles, D. P. Mihaylov, S. Ossokine, L. Pompili, and A. Ramos-Buades, “Theoretical groundwork supporting the precessing-spin two-body dynamics of the effective-one-body waveform models SEOBNRv5,”Phys. Rev. D108 no. 12, (2023) 124036,arXiv:2303.18143 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2023
[59]

Buonanno, G

A. Buonanno, G. U. Jakobsen, and G. Mogull, “Post-Minkowskian theory meets the spinning effective-one-body approach for two-body scattering,”Phys. Rev. D110no. 4, (2024) 044038,arXiv:2402.12342 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[60]

The simplest massive S-matrix: from minimal coupling to Black Holes,

M.-Z. Chung, Y.-T. Huang, J.-W. Kim, and S. Lee, “The simplest massive S-matrix: from minimal coupling to Black Holes,”JHEP04(2019) 156,arXiv:1812.08752 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2019
[61]

Kerr-Newman stress-tensor from minimal coupling,

M.-Z. Chung, Y.-T. Huang, and J.-W. Kim, “Kerr-Newman stress-tensor from minimal coupling,”JHEP12(2020) 103,arXiv:1911.12775 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2020
[62]

Kerr black holes as elementary particles,

N. Arkani-Hamed, Y.-t. Huang, and D. O’Connell, “Kerr black holes as elementary particles,”JHEP01(2020) 046,arXiv:1906.10100 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2020
[63]

Compton black-hole scattering for s≤5/2,

M. Chiodaroli, H. Johansson, and P. Pichini, “Compton black-hole scattering for s≤5/2,” JHEP02(2022) 156,arXiv:2107.14779 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2022
[64]

Kerr Black Holes From Massive Higher-Spin Gauge Symmetry,

L. Cangemi, M. Chiodaroli, H. Johansson, A. Ochirov, P. Pichini, and E. Skvortsov, “Kerr Black Holes From Massive Higher-Spin Gauge Symmetry,”Phys. Rev. Lett.131no. 22, (2023) 221401,arXiv:2212.06120 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2023
[65]

Classical spin gravitational Compton scattering,

N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, G. Chen, and M. Skowronek, “Classical spin gravitational Compton scattering,”JHEP06(2023) 170,arXiv:2302.00498 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2023
[66]

Covariant Compton Amplitudes in Gravity with Classical Spin,

N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, G. Chen, and M. Skowronek, “Covariant Compton Amplitudes in Gravity with Classical Spin,”Phys. Rev. Lett.132no. 19, (2024) 191603, arXiv:2309.11249 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2024
[67]

A worldsheet for Kerr,

A. Guevara, B. Maybee, A. Ochirov, D. O’connell, and J. Vines, “A worldsheet for Kerr,” JHEP03(2021) 201,arXiv:2012.11570 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2021
[68]

Symplectic Perturbation Theory in Massive Ambitwistor Space: A Zig-Zag Theory of Massive Spinning Particles,

J.-H. Kim and S. Lee, “Symplectic Perturbation Theory in Massive Ambitwistor Space: A Zig-Zag Theory of Massive Spinning Particles,”arXiv:2301.06203 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[69]

A Magic Electromagnetic Field

D. Lynden-Bell, “A magic electromagnetic field,” inStellar Astrophysical Fluid Dynamics, ch. 25, pp. 369–376. Cambridge University Press, 2003. arXiv:astro-ph/0207064

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003
[70]

The relativistic spherical top as a massive twistor,

J.-H. Kim, J.-W. Kim, and S. Lee, “The relativistic spherical top as a massive twistor,”J. Phys. A54no. 33, (2021) 335203,arXiv:2102.07063 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2021
[71]

Note on the kerr spinning-particle equations of motion

J.-H. Kim, “Note on the kerr spinning-particle equations of motion.” To Appear

work page
[72]

Kerr effective action from orbit-spin duality

J.-H. Kim, “Kerr effective action from orbit-spin duality.” To Appear

work page
[73]

Geodesic deviation to all orders via a tangent bundle formalism,

J.-H. Kim, “Geodesic deviation to all orders via a tangent bundle formalism,” arXiv:2509.23600 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv
[74]

Gravitational Instantons,

S. W. Hawking, “Gravitational Instantons,”Phys. Lett. A60(1977) 81

work page 1977
[75]

Gravitational Multi-Instantons,

G. W. Gibbons and S. W. Hawking, “Gravitational Multi-Instantons,”Phys. Lett. B78 (1978) 430. – 32 –

work page 1978
[76]

Empty space-times admitting a three parameter group of motions,

A. H. Taub, “Empty space-times admitting a three parameter group of motions,”Annals Math.53(1951) 472–490

work page 1951
[77]

Empty space generalization of the Schwarzschild metric,

E. Newman, L. Tamburino, and T. Unti, “Empty space generalization of the Schwarzschild metric,”J. Math. Phys.4(1963) 915

work page 1963
[78]

The Flatter regions of Newman, Unti and Tamburino’s generalized Schwarzschild space,

C. W. Misner, “The Flatter regions of Newman, Unti and Tamburino’s generalized Schwarzschild space,”J. Math. Phys.4(1963) 924–938

work page 1963
[79]

A new interpretation of the NUT metric in general relativity,

W. B. Bonnor, “A new interpretation of the NUT metric in general relativity,”Math. Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc.66no. 1, (1969) 145–151

work page 1969
[80]

Physical interpretation of NUT metric,

A. Sackfield, “Physical interpretation of NUT metric,” inMathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, vol. 1, pp. 89–94, Cambridge University Press. 1971

work page 1971
[81]

A combined Kerr-NUT solution of the Einstein field equations,

M. Demianski and E. T. Newman, “A combined Kerr-NUT solution of the Einstein field equations,”Bulletin de l’Academie Polonaise des Sciences, Serie des Sciences Mathematiques, Astronomiques et Physiques14(12, 1966) 653–657

work page 1966
[82]

A class of solutions of Einstein-Maxwell equations,

J. F. Pleba´ nski, “A class of solutions of Einstein-Maxwell equations,”Annals Phys.90no. 1, (1975) 196–255

work page 1975

Showing first 80 references.