Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 4 minor 67 references

Time-domain sound field estimation using kernel ridge regression

T0 review · 1 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A time-domain reproducing kernel Hilbert space lets kernel ridge regression estimate whole room impulse response functions in one closed form, wave equation included.

desk verdict Useful time-domain KRR extension with broad experiments, but the central derivation of the data-weighted estimator has a fixable ordering error in Eq. (29). read the letter →

arxiv 2509.05720 v1 pith:BINEG457 submitted 2025-09-06 eess.AS cs.SDeess.SP

Jesper Brunnström , Martin Bo M{o}ller , Jan {O}stergaard , Shoichi Koyama , Toon van Waterschoot , Marc Moonen This is my paper · ORCID
classification eess.AScs.SDeess.SP PACS 43.60.+d
keywords soundfieldestimationkernelridgeregressionroomimpulseresponsereproducingHilbertspacetime-domainaudiodirectionalweightingdataHelmholtzequation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper extends kernel ridge regression (KRR) sound field estimation from single-frequency fields to discrete-time sound fields. It constructs a reproducing kernel Hilbert space whose functions are discrete-time room impulse responses defined over a spatial region, with a closed-form kernel derived from the Herglotz plane-wave model (a superposition of plane waves) and the DFT. In this space, the optimal estimate is given in closed form and automatically satisfies the homogeneous wave equation, so no soft physics penalty is needed. The paper shows that weighting microphone data by a time envelope, built from propagation delay and reverberation time, improves estimation error in noisy conditions, and that this temporal weighting combines with directional weighting. If right, the method makes a broad class of time-domain sound field reconstruction problems solvable by KRR with exact physical constraints.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the time-domain reproducing kernel Gamma-tilde(r,r') = F^{-1} Gamma(r,r') F = Re[BC Gamma(r,r') F], whose frequency-domain diagonal entries are spherical Bessel kernels j0(omega_l / c * ||r - r'||). It turns the wave equation from a constraint into a built-in property of the function space, so the infinite-dimensional optimization collapses to a finite linear system via the representer theorem. A secondary mechanism is the data-weighting envelope Q_tilde_m: a diagonal operator over time samples that encodes the expected signal-to-noise ratio of the RIR over time, such as the exponential envelope constructed from propagation delay and RT60.

What would settle it

Synthesize a noise-free sound field from a point source placed inside the estimation region and estimate it with many microphones; the plane-wave RKHS cannot represent the source term, so the error should plateau above zero and reveal the source-free assumption as the limiting factor.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that time-domain sound field estimation can be solved exactly, in closed form, by kernel ridge regression. Starting from the usual per-frequency RKHS of solutions to the Helmholtz equation, the authors use the DFT to build a time-domain RKHS whose kernel is Gamma-tilde(r,r') = F^{-1} Gamma(r,r') F. The representer theorem then reduces the infinite-dimensional estimation problem to solving the linear system a_opt = (Gamma + lambda I)^{-1} h, or, with regularization and data weighting, a_opt = (Gamma_r + lambda Q^{-1})^{-1} h; the estimate at any position is a weighted sum of kernel blocks. The paper proves that with identity weighting this is equivalent to solving

Load-bearing premise

The sound field in the target region is source-free and can be represented as a superposition of plane waves through the Herglotz integral; if a source or evanescent field lies inside the region, the RKHS model is incomplete and the estimate can be biased.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • With identity weighting, the time-domain estimate equals the inverse DFT of per-frequency KRR estimates (except the Nyquist bin), so the method reduces to prior KRR when no time-domain prior is used.
  • Problems requiring joint treatment of frequencies, such as estimating full RIRs rather than single tones, become solvable by KRR with a closed-form solution.
  • A practical exponential envelope using only propagation delay and reverberation time nearly matches the oracle envelope, so the temporal weighting is implementable in real rooms.
  • Combining temporal data weighting with directional weighting improves NMSE in free-field, simulated reverberant, and real-room tests, especially at low SNR and at low frequencies.
  • The estimator remains linear in the data, so it can be embedded in spatial active noise control and sound zone control pipelines just like the single-frequency version.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the RKHS separates space and time through the DFT, a natural extension would be to build space-time kernels for moving microphones, letting one KRR problem use recordings taken at different positions and times jointly.
  • The envelope weighting could be learned from a first-pass estimate of the RIR instead of being fixed by RT60, giving an iterative estimator that adapts the temporal prior to the data.
  • The same construction likely extends to other wave models, such as spherical or higher-order basis functions, whenever a closed-form Herglotz-type kernel exists, though the paper does not derive those.
  • An immediate testable extension is to compare the exactly constrained time-domain estimator against physics-informed neural networks in low-data regimes; the closed form should win when the sound field is truly source-free and noise-dominated.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper generalizes single-frequency kernel ridge regression (KRR) sound field estimation to discrete-time sound fields. A time-domain reproducing kernel Hilbert space is constructed via the DFT of the frequency-domain plane-wave kernel, yielding a closed-form estimator (Eqs. (20), (24)). The framework is extended to include directional regularization and a time-domain data weighting (Eqs. (25)-(30)), with envelopes motivated by RIR delay and reverberation time. The method is evaluated on free-field, simulated room, and real MeshRIR data under four noise models, and the data weighting is shown to improve NMSE, especially when combined with directional weighting.

Significance. If the derivation is correct, this is a useful and nontrivial extension of the KRR sound field estimation framework: it moves from per-frequency processing to joint time-domain estimation, permits temporal priors, and provides closed-form solutions with physical wave-equation constraints. The paper is careful in its appendices: the kernel construction, the DFT convention, and the equivalence with the frequency-domain solution are all addressed explicitly. The availability of code and the use of real recorded RIRs are also strengths. The main caveats are the source-free/Herglotz model assumption and the heuristic choices of λ, β, τ_init, which are not the central claims of the paper. The data-weighting envelopes use physical priors (delay, RT60) rather than being fitted to the evaluation data, and the oracle envelope is explicitly an upper bound.

major comments (1)
  1. [§IV-B, Eq. (29)] The cross term in the expansion of the weighted data term is mis-ordered. Expanding the first sum in (26) with u(r)=Σ Γ_r(r,r_m)a_m gives -2⟨Qh, Γ_r a⟩, which, because Γ_r is self-adjoint, equals -2⟨Γ_r Q h, a⟩, not -2⟨Q Γ_r h, a⟩ as printed. The matrices Γ_r and Q do not commute in general (already for M=1, L=2, Γ_r is a non-diagonal symmetric matrix while Q is diagonal). With the printed expression, the optimality condition becomes (Γ_r Q Γ_r + λΓ_r)a = QΓ_r h, which does not factor to (30). With the corrected cross term, the optimality condition is Γ_r Q Γ_r a + λΓ_r a = Γ_r Q h; for invertible Γ_r this is equivalent to (Γ_r + λQ^{-1})a = h and hence to (30). Thus the final estimator is correct for the intended objective, but the derivation as written is algebraically inconsistent and must be corrected.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§V-B, Eq. (37)] The inequality in the linear envelope definition is malformed: "l0 ≥ l ≤ l0 + f_s τ_decay" should presumably be "l0 ≤ l ≤ l0 + f_s τ_decay" (or the intended interval should be stated more carefully).
  2. [§VI-A, Fig. 2] The caption leaves it to the reader to infer which panel is simulated and which is real. Please state this explicitly in the caption.
  3. [Appendix D] The statement that the equivalence with the frequency-domain method holds "except for the Nyquist frequency" is made before the assumption of odd L is introduced. It would be clearer to state the odd-L assumption at the start of the derivation and then discuss the Nyquist caveat.
  4. [Code availability] The code link is given as a version-less GitHub URL. For reproducibility, a release or persistent identifier (e.g., Zenodo DOI) would be preferable.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the time-domain estimator is derived from the DFT and representer theorem; the data-weighting envelopes are priors or explicitly labeled as infeasible oracles, not fitted predictions.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained: the time-domain RKHS is constructed from the frequency-domain plane-wave model via the DFT, and the estimator in (20)-(24) follows by the representer theorem and convex quadratic minimization. The data-weighting envelopes are not fitted to the evaluation data: exponential/linear envelopes use physical priors (propagation delay, RT60), and the oracle envelope is explicitly described as infeasible in practice, so its use is a controlled upper bound rather than a predicted quantity. The citations to prior work by the same group, especially [27], [33], and the MeshRIR dataset [62], are to independently established results and data; Appendix D proves equivalence to [27] rather than assuming the target result, and the spherical-integral identity (50) is a standard mathematical fact. Thus no claim reduces to its input by construction. One non-circular issue should be noted separately: in Eq. (29) the cross term is printed as -2⟨QΓ_r h,a⟩, whereas the claimed solution (30) follows only from the correctly ordered cross term -2⟨Γ_r Q h,a⟩ (or if Q and Γ_r commute). This is a concrete derivation/typo problem, but it is a correctness defect, not a circularity, because it does not make the result equivalent to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The method introduces no new physical entities. The free parameters are standard hyperparameters for KRR (λ, β) and envelope shapes (τ_init, q_min); room parameters (l_0, RT60) are external inputs. The main assumptions are the source-free plane-wave model and a known active source.

free parameters (5)
  • lambda = (σ²_p - σ²_s)/(10 σ²_s)
    Regularization parameter tied to SNR; hand-set rather than estimated.
  • tau_init = 0.05 s
    Initial time constant for exponential envelope, chosen by hand (Section VI).
  • beta_l = 5 (free field), 1 (reverberant)
    Directional weighting strength, selected per scenario (Section VI-D).
  • q_min = 10^-6
    Floor for envelope values to ensure invertibility (Section V-B).
  • l_0 and RT60 = from room acoustics
    Inputs to the envelope model, measured or estimated from the room, not fitted to estimation error.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Sound field in Ω satisfies homogeneous Helmholtz equation (7)
    Basis of the RKHS construction.
  • standard math Herglotz integral (8) can approximate any solution to (7) arbitrarily well
    Used to represent sound fields as plane wave superpositions.
  • standard math DFT F as defined is a unitary map between t and f
    Required for time/frequency kernel equivalence.
  • domain assumption R is invertible with domain H~, so Z is infinite-dimensional
    Needed for closed-form regularized solution (Appendix E).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Time-domain sound field estimation using kernel ridge regression." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BINEG457

@misc{pith2026250905720,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Time-domain sound field estimation using kernel ridge regression},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BINEG457}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.05720}
}
read the original abstract

Sound field estimation methods based on kernel ridge regression have proven effective, allowing for strict enforcement of physical properties, in addition to the inclusion of prior knowledge such as directionality of the sound field. These methods have been formulated for single-frequency sound fields, restricting the types of data and prior knowledge that can be used. In this paper, the kernel ridge regression approach is generalized to consider discrete-time sound fields. The proposed method provides time-domain sound field estimates that can be computed in closed form, are guaranteed to be physically realizable, and for which time-domain properties of the sound fields can be exploited to improve estimation performance. Exploiting prior information on the time-domain behaviour of room impulse responses, the estimation performance of the proposed method is shown to be improved using a time-domain data weighting, demonstrating the usefulness of the proposed approach. It is further shown using both simulated and real data that the time-domain data weighting can be combined with a directional weighting, exploiting prior knowledge of both spatial and temporal properties of the room impulse responses. The theoretical framework of the proposed method enables solving a broader class of sound field estimation problems using kernel ridge regression where it would be required to consider the time-domain response rather than the frequency-domain response of each frequency separately.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.05720 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Examples of envelopes used for the data weighting [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Positions of microphones, loudspeaker and evaluation points for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Estimation performance for different noise levels and data weighting [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Estimation performance for different number of microphones [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Estimation performance in free field (top) and reverberant (bottom) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Estimation performance on real RIRs for different amounts of wind [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Estimation performance per frequency using real data from [62] [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The sound field estimates using the real RIR data without added noise, shown at all evaluation points, the geometry of which can be seen in Fig. 2. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_10.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 66 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Personal sound zones: Delivering interface-free audio to multiple listeners,

    T. Betlehem, W. Zhang, M. A. Poletti, and T. D. Abhayapala, “Personal sound zones: Delivering interface-free audio to multiple listeners,”IEEE Signal Process. Mag., vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 81–91, Mar. 2015

    work page 2015

  2. [2]

    Sur- round by sound: A review of spatial audio recording and reproduction,

    W. Zhang, P. N. Samarasinghe, H. Chen, and T. D. Abhayapala, “Sur- round by sound: A review of spatial audio recording and reproduction,” Appl. Sci., vol. 7, no. 5, May 2017, Art. no. 532

    work page 2017

  3. [3]

    The plenacoustic function and its sampling,

    T. Ajdler, L. Sbaiz, and M. Vetterli, “The plenacoustic function and its sampling,”IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 54, no. 10, pp. 3790–3804, Oct. 2006

    work page 2006

  4. [4]

    Optimally regular- ized adaptive filtering algorithms for room acoustic signal enhancement,

    T. van Waterschoot, G. Rombouts, and M. Moonen, “Optimally regular- ized adaptive filtering algorithms for room acoustic signal enhancement,” Signal Process., vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 594–611, Mar. 2008

    work page 2008

  5. [5]

    Sound field analysis in room acoustics,

    B. Bernsch ¨utz, P. Stade, and M. R ¨uhl, “Sound field analysis in room acoustics,” inProc. VDT Int. Conv., 2012, pp. 1–22

    work page 2012

  6. [6]

    Maximum a posteriori estimation of room impulse responses,

    D. Florencio and Z. Zhang, “Maximum a posteriori estimation of room impulse responses,” inProc. IEEE Int. Conf. Acoust., Speech, Signal Process. (ICASSP), Apr. 2015, pp. 728–732

    work page 2015

  7. [7]

    Low-rank tensor modeling of room impulse responses,

    M. J ¨almby, F. Elvander, and T. van Waterschoot, “Low-rank tensor modeling of room impulse responses,” inProc. European Signal Process. Conf. (EUSIPCO), Aug. 2021, pp. 111–115

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Generative modeling based manifold learning for adaptive filtering guidance,

    K. Helwani, P. Smaragdis, and M. M. Goodwin, “Generative modeling based manifold learning for adaptive filtering guidance,” inProc. IEEE Int. Conf. Acoust., Speech, Signal Process. (ICASSP), 2023

    work page 2023

Show all 67 references
  1. [9]

    Room impulse response variation due to thermal fluctuation and its impact on acoustic echo cancellation,

    G. Elko, E. Diethorn, and T. Gaensler, “Room impulse response variation due to thermal fluctuation and its impact on acoustic echo cancellation,” Proc. Int. Workshop Acoust. Echo Noise Cont. (IWAENC), Jan. 2003

    2003

  2. [10]

    Time variance in measured room impulse responses,

    K. Prawda, S. Schlecht, and V . V ¨alim¨aki, “Time variance in measured room impulse responses,” inProc. Forum Acusticum, Sept. 2023

    2023

  3. [11]

    Sound zones: On the effect of ambient temperature variations in feed-forward systems,

    M. Olsen and M. B. Møller, “Sound zones: On the effect of ambient temperature variations in feed-forward systems,” inProc. AES Conv. May 2017, pp. 1009–1018

    2017

  4. [12]

    Short-time coherence between repeated room impulse response measurements,

    K. Prawda, S. J. Schlecht, and V . V ¨alim¨aki, “Short-time coherence between repeated room impulse response measurements,”J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 156, no. 2, pp. 1017–1028, Aug. 2024

    2024

  5. [13]

    Reconstruction of the sound field in a room using compressive sensing,

    S. A. Verburg and E. Fernandez-Grande, “Reconstruction of the sound field in a room using compressive sensing,”J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 143, no. 6, pp. 3770–3779, June 2018

    2018

  6. [14]

    A compressed sensing framework for dynamic sound-field measurements,

    F. Katzberg, R. Mazur, M. Maass, P. Koch, and A. Mertins, “A compressed sensing framework for dynamic sound-field measurements,” IEEE/ACM Trans. Audio, Speech, Lang. Process., vol. 26, no. 11, pp. 1962–1975, Nov. 2018

    1962

  7. [15]

    Sparse representation of a spatial sound field in a reverberant environment,

    S. Koyama and L. Daudet, “Sparse representation of a spatial sound field in a reverberant environment,”IEEE J. Sel. Top. Signal Process., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 172–184, Mar. 2019

    2019

  8. [16]

    A compressive sensing approach for the reconstruction of the soundfield produced by directive sources in reverberant rooms,

    S. Damiano, F. Borra, A. Bernardini, F. Antonacci, and A. Sarti, “A compressive sensing approach for the reconstruction of the soundfield produced by directive sources in reverberant rooms,”IEEE/ACM Trans. Audio, Speech, Lang. Process., vol. 32, pp. 2667–2679, 2024

    2024

  9. [17]

    Spatio-temporal bayesian regression for room impulse response reconstruction with spherical waves,

    D. Caviedes-Nozal and E. Fernandez-Grande, “Spatio-temporal bayesian regression for room impulse response reconstruction with spherical waves,”IEEE/ACM Trans. Audio, Speech, Lang. Process., vol. 31, pp. 3263–3277, 2023

    2023

  10. [18]

    Spatial reconstruction of the sound field in a room in the modal frequency range using Bayesian inference,

    J. M. Schmid, E. Fernandez-Grande, M. Hahmann, C. Gurbuz, M. Eser, and S. Marburg, “Spatial reconstruction of the sound field in a room in the modal frequency range using Bayesian inference,”J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 150, no. 6, pp. 4385–4394, Dec. 2021

    2021

  11. [19]

    Generative adversarial networks with physical sound field priors,

    X. Karakonstantis and E. Fernandez-Grande, “Generative adversarial networks with physical sound field priors,”J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 154, no. 2, pp. 1226–1238, Aug. 2023

    2023

  12. [20]

    Deep prior-based audio inpainting using multi-resolution harmonic convolutional neural networks,

    F. Miotello, M. Pezzoli, L. Comanducci, F. Antonacci, and A. Sarti, “Deep prior-based audio inpainting using multi-resolution harmonic convolutional neural networks,”IEEE/ACM Trans. Audio, Speech, Lang. Process., vol. 32, pp. 113–123, 2024

    2024

  13. [21]

    Physics- informed convolutional neural network with bicubic spline interpolation for sound field estimation,

    K. Shigemi, S. Koyama, T. Nakamura, and H. Saruwatari, “Physics- informed convolutional neural network with bicubic spline interpolation for sound field estimation,” inProc. Int. Workshop Acoust. Signal Enhancement (IWAENC), Sept. 2022

    2022

  14. [22]

    Sound field reconstruction in rooms: Inpainting meets super- resolution,

    F. Llu ´ıs, P. Mart ´ınez-Nuevo, M. Bo Møller, and S. Ewan Shep- stone, “Sound field reconstruction in rooms: Inpainting meets super- resolution,”J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 148, no. 2, pp. 649–659, Aug. 2020

    2020

  15. [23]

    Physics-informed neural network for volumetric sound field reconstruction of speech signals,

    M. Olivieri, X. Karakonstantis, M. Pezzoli, F. Antonacci, A. Sarti, and E. Fernandez-Grande, “Physics-informed neural network for volumetric sound field reconstruction of speech signals,”EURASIP Journal on 13 Audio, Speech, and Music Processing, vol. 2024, no. 1, pp. 42, Sept. 2024

    2024

  16. [24]

    Room impulse response interpolation using a sparse spatio-temporal representation of the sound field,

    N. Antonello, E. D. Sena, M. Moonen, P. A. Naylor, and T. van Waterschoot, “Room impulse response interpolation using a sparse spatio-temporal representation of the sound field,”IEEE/ACM Trans. Audio, Speech, Lang. Process., vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 1929–1941, Oct. 2017

    1929

  17. [25]

    Optimal transport based impulse response interpolation in the presence of calibration errors,

    D. Sundstr ¨om, F. Elvander, and A. Jakobsson, “Optimal transport based impulse response interpolation in the presence of calibration errors,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 72, pp. 1548–1559, 2024

    2024

  18. [26]

    Saburou and Y

    S. Saburou and Y . Sawano,Theory of Reproducing Kernels and Applications, vol. 44 ofDevelopments in Mathematics, Springer, 2016

    2016

  19. [27]

    Kernel ridge regression with constraint of Helmholtz equation for sound field interpolation,

    N. Ueno, S. Koyama, and H. Saruwatari, “Kernel ridge regression with constraint of Helmholtz equation for sound field interpolation,” inProc. Int. Workshop Acoust. Signal Enhancement (IWAENC). Sept. 2018, pp. 436–440

    2018

  20. [28]

    Feedforward spatial active noise control based on kernel interpolation of sound field,

    H. Ito, S. Koyama, N. Ueno, and H. Saruwatari, “Feedforward spatial active noise control based on kernel interpolation of sound field,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Acoust., Speech, Signal Process. (ICASSP). May 2019, pp. 511–515

    2019

  21. [29]

    Kernel-interpolation-based filtered-x least mean square for spatial active noise control in time domain,

    J. Brunnstr ¨om and S. Koyama, “Kernel-interpolation-based filtered-x least mean square for spatial active noise control in time domain,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Acoust., Speech, Signal Process. (ICASSP), June 2021, pp. 161–165

    2021

  22. [30]

    Spatial active noise control based on kernel interpolation of sound field,

    S. Koyama, J. Brunnstr ¨om, H. Ito, N. Ueno, and H. Saruwatari, “Spatial active noise control based on kernel interpolation of sound field,” IEEE/ACM Trans. Audio, Speech, Lang. Process., vol. 29, pp. 3052– 3063, Aug. 2021

    2021

  23. [31]

    Variable span trade-off filter for sound zone control with kernel interpolation weighting,

    J. Brunnstr ¨om, S. Koyama, and M. Moonen, “Variable span trade-off filter for sound zone control with kernel interpolation weighting,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Acoust., Speech, Signal Process. (ICASSP), May 2022, pp. 1071–1075

    2022

  24. [32]

    Weighted pressure matching based on kernel interpolation for sound field reproduction,

    S. Koyama and K. Arikawa, “Weighted pressure matching based on kernel interpolation for sound field reproduction,” inProc. Int. Congr. Acoust. (ICA), Oct. 2022

    2022

  25. [33]

    Directionally weighted wave field estimation exploiting prior information on source direction,

    N. Ueno, S. Koyama, and H. Saruwatari, “Directionally weighted wave field estimation exploiting prior information on source direction,”IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 69, pp. 2383–2395, Apr. 2021

    2021

  26. [34]

    Sound field estimation based on physics-constrained kernel interpolation adapted to environment,

    J. Ribeiro, S. Koyama, and H. Saruwatari, “Sound field estimation based on physics-constrained kernel interpolation adapted to environment,” IEEE/ACM Trans. Audio, Speech, Lang. Process., vol. 32, pp. 4369– 4383, Sept. 2024

    2024

  27. [35]

    Wavefield analysis over large areas using distributed higher order microphones,

    P. Samarasinghe, T. Abhayapala, and M. Poletti, “Wavefield analysis over large areas using distributed higher order microphones,”IEEE/ACM Trans. Audio, Speech, Lang. Process., vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 647–658, Mar. 2014

    2014

  28. [36]

    An efficient parameterization of the room transfer function,

    P. Samarasinghe, T. Abhayapala, M. Poletti, and T. Betlehem, “An efficient parameterization of the room transfer function,”IEEE/ACM Trans. Audio, Speech, Lang. Process., vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 2217–2227, Dec. 2015

    2015

  29. [37]

    Sound field recording using distributed microphones based on harmonic analysis of infinite order,

    N. Ueno, S. Koyama, and H. Saruwatari, “Sound field recording using distributed microphones based on harmonic analysis of infinite order,” IEEE Signal Process. Lett., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 135–139, Jan. 2018

    2018

  30. [38]

    Bayesian sound field estimation using uncertain data,

    J. Brunnstr ¨om, M. B. Møller, J. Østergaard, and M. Moonen, “Bayesian sound field estimation using uncertain data,” inProc. Int. Workshop Acoust. Signal Enhancement (IWAENC), Sept. 2024, pp. 329–333

    2024

  31. [39]

    Bayesian sound field estimation using moving microphones,

    J. Brunnstr ¨om, M. B. Møller, and M. Moonen, “Bayesian sound field estimation using moving microphones,”IEEE Open J. Signal Process., vol. 6, pp. 312–322, Jan. 2025

    2025

  32. [40]

    C. E. Rasmussen and C. K. I. Williams,Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning, Adaptive Computation and Machine Learning. MIT Press, 2006

    2006

  33. [41]

    Gaussian processes for sound field reconstruction,

    D. Caviedes-Nozal, N. A. B. Riis, F. M. Heuchel, J. Brunskog, P. Ger- stoft, and E. Fernandez-Grande, “Gaussian processes for sound field reconstruction,”J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 149, no. 2, pp. 1107–1119, Feb. 2021

    2021

  34. [42]

    Reconstruction of room impulse responses over extended domains for navigable sound field reproduction,

    E. Fernandez-Grande, D. Caviedes-Nozal, M. Hahmann, X. Karakon- stantis, and S. A. Verburg, “Reconstruction of room impulse responses over extended domains for navigable sound field reproduction,” inProc. Int. Conf. Immersive 3D Audio, Sept. 2021

    2021

  35. [43]

    Room impulse response reconstruction using pattern-coupled sparse bayesian learning with spherical waves,

    X. Feng, J. Cheng, S. Chen, and Y . Shen, “Room impulse response reconstruction using pattern-coupled sparse bayesian learning with spherical waves,”IEEE Signal Process. Lett., vol. 31, pp. 1925–1929, 2024

    1925

  36. [44]

    Sound field reconstruction using neural processes with dynamic kernels,

    Z. Liang, W. Zhang, and T. D. Abhayapala, “Sound field reconstruction using neural processes with dynamic kernels,”EURASIP J. Audio Speech Music Process., vol. 2024, Feb. 2024

    2024

  37. [45]

    A generalized representer theorem,

    B. Sch ¨olkopf, R. Herbrich, and A. J. Smola, “A generalized representer theorem,” inProc. Int. Conf. Comput. Learn. Theory. July 2001, pp. 416–426

    2001

  38. [46]

    The representer theorem for Hilbert spaces: A necessary and sufficient condition,

    F. Dinuzzo and B. Sch ¨olkopf, “The representer theorem for Hilbert spaces: A necessary and sufficient condition,” inAdv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst.2012, vol. 25

    2012

  39. [47]

    A unifying view of representer theorems,

    A. Argyriou and F. Dinuzzo, “A unifying view of representer theorems,” inProc. Int. Conf. Mach. Learn. (ICML), June 2014, vol. 32, pp. 748– 756

    2014

  40. [48]

    A unifying framework in vector-valued reproducing kernel hilbert spaces for manifold regulariza- tion and co-regularized multi-view learning,

    H. Q. Minh, L. Bazzani, and V . Murino, “A unifying framework in vector-valued reproducing kernel hilbert spaces for manifold regulariza- tion and co-regularized multi-view learning,”J. Mach. Learn. Res., vol. 17, pp. 1–72, 2016

    2016

  41. [49]

    A generalized representer theorem for Hilbert space-valued functions,

    S. Diwale and C. Jones, “A generalized representer theorem for Hilbert space-valued functions,” Sept. 2018, arXiv preprint, arXiv:1809.07347

    2018 arXiv

  42. [50]

    On representer theorems and convex regularization,

    C. Boyer, A. Chambolle, Y . D. Castro, V . Duval, F. de Gournay, and P. Weiss, “On representer theorems and convex regularization,”SIAM J. Optim., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 1260–1281, Jan. 2019

    2019

  43. [51]

    Sound field estimation using deep kernel learning regularized by the wave equation,

    D. Sundstr ¨om, S. Koyama, and A. Jakobsson, “Sound field estimation using deep kernel learning regularized by the wave equation,” inProc. Int. Workshop Acoust. Signal Enhancement (IWAENC), Sept. 2024, pp. 319–323

    2024

  44. [52]

    P. A. Martin,Multiple Scattering: Interaction of Time-Harmonic Waves with N Obstacles, vol. 107 ofEncyclopedia of Mathematics and Its Applications, Cambridge University Press, 2006

    2006

  45. [53]

    JAX: Composable transformations of Python+NumPy programs,

    J. Bradbury, R. Frostig, P. Hawkins, M. J. Johnson, C. Leary, D. Maclau- rin, G. Necula, A. Paszke, J. VanderPlas, S. Wanderman-Milne, and Q. Zhang, “JAX: Composable transformations of Python+NumPy programs,” 2018, [Online]. Available: http://github.com/jax-ml/jax

    2018

  46. [54]

    Array programming with NumPy,

    C. R. Harris, K. J. Millman, S. J. van der Walt, R. Gommers, P. Virtanen, D. Cournapeau, E. Wieser, J. Taylor, S. Berg, N. J. Smith, R. Kern, M. Picus, S. Hoyer, M. H. van Kerkwijk, M. Brett, A. Haldane, J. F. del R´ıo, M. Wiebe, P. Peterson, P. G´erard-Marchant, K. Sheppard, ...

    2020

  47. [55]

    R. A. Kennedy and P. Sadeghi,Hilbert Space Methods in Signal Processing, Cambridge University Press, Mar. 2013

    2013

  48. [56]

    E. G. Williams and J. A. Mann,Fourier Acoustics: Sound Radiation and Nearfield Acoustical Holography, vol. 108, Academic Press, 1999

    1999

  49. [57]

    Physics-constrained adaptive kernel interpolation for region-to-region acoustic transfer func- tion: A Bayesian approach,

    J. G. C. Ribeiro, S. Koyama, and H. Saruwatari, “Physics-constrained adaptive kernel interpolation for region-to-region acoustic transfer func- tion: A Bayesian approach,”EURASIP Journal on Audio, Speech, and Music Processing, vol. 2024, no. 1, pp. 43, Sept. 2024

    2024

  50. [58]

    Mardia and P

    K. Mardia and P. Jupp,Directional Statistics, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. John Wiley & Sons, 2000

    2000

  51. [59]

    Towards optimal regularization by incorporating prior knowledge in an acoustic echo canceller,

    T. van Waterschoot, G. Rombouts, and M. Moonen, “Towards optimal regularization by incorporating prior knowledge in an acoustic echo canceller,” inProc. Int. Workshop Acoust. Echo Noise Cont. (IWAENC), Sept. 2005, pp. 157–160

    2005

  52. [60]

    Image method for efficiently simulating small-room acoustics,

    J. B. Allen and D. A. Berkley, “Image method for efficiently simulating small-room acoustics,”J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 943–950, Apr. 1979

    1979

  53. [61]

    Pyroomacoustics: A Python package for audio room simulations and array processing algorithms,

    R. Scheibler, E. Bezzam, and I. Dokmani ´c, “Pyroomacoustics: A Python package for audio room simulations and array processing algorithms,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Acoust., Speech, Signal Process. (ICASSP), Apr. 2018, pp. 351–355

    2018

  54. [62]

    MeshRIR: A dataset of room impulse responses on meshed grid points for evaluating sound field analysis and synthesis methods,

    S. Koyama, T. Nishida, K. Kimura, T. Abe, N. Ueno, and J. Brunnstr ¨om, “MeshRIR: A dataset of room impulse responses on meshed grid points for evaluating sound field analysis and synthesis methods,” inProc. IEEE Int. Workshop Appl. Signal Process. Audio Acoust. (WASPAA), Oct....

    2021

  55. [63]

    Perfect sequence excitation of the NLMS algorithm and its application to acoustic echo control,

    C. Antweiler and M. D ¨orbecker, “Perfect sequence excitation of the NLMS algorithm and its application to acoustic echo control,”Ann. T´el´ecommun., vol. 49, no. 7, pp. 386–397, July 1994

    1994

  56. [64]

    NLMS-type system identification of MISO systems with shifted perfect sequences,

    C. Antweiler, A. Telle, and P. Vary, “NLMS-type system identification of MISO systems with shifted perfect sequences,” inProc. Int. Workshop Acoust. Signal Enhancement (IWAENC), Sept. 2008

    2008

  57. [65]

    Measurement, analysis and simulation of wind noise signals for mobile communication devices,

    C. M. Nelke and P. Vary, “Measurement, analysis and simulation of wind noise signals for mobile communication devices,” inProc. Int. Workshop Acoust. Signal Enhancement (IWAENC), Sept. 2014, pp. 327–331

    2014

  58. [66]

    Wind noise database,

    C. Nelke, “Wind noise database,” 2014, [Online]. Available: https://www.iks.rwth-aachen.de/forschung/tools- downloads/databases/wind-noise-database

    2014

  59. [67]

    J. B. Conway,A Course in Functional Analysis, Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer, 2nd edition, Sept. 1990

    1990

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.