Sub-spin-flop switching of a fully compensated antiferromagnet by magnetic field

Bo Liu; Ding-Fu Shao; Gang Li; Honglin Zhou; Liqin Yan; Muyu Wang; Shiliang Li; Xiaoyan Ma; Xiquan Zheng; Yingying Peng

arxiv: 2509.07351 · v2 · submitted 2025-09-09 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall · cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Sub-spin-flop switching of a fully compensated antiferromagnet by magnetic field

Honglin Zhou , Muyu Wang , Yinina Ma , Xiaoyan Ma , Gang Li , Zihao Tao , Xiquan Zheng , Liqin Yan

show 4 more authors

Yingying Peng Ding-Fu Shao Bo Liu Shiliang Li

This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 18:39 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-sci

keywords antiferromagnetdomain selectionresistivity anisotropyCeNiAsOspintronicsmagnetic field controlNéel phasespin-density-wave

0 comments

The pith

Modest in-plane magnetic fields select one of two degenerate domains in a compensated antiferromagnet, switching its resistivity anisotropy by up to 35%.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper demonstrates that fully compensated antiferromagnets, which have no net magnetization, can still be manipulated using relatively weak magnetic fields. In the material CeNiAsO, an in-plane field below the spin-flop threshold chooses between two domains that have their magnetic sublattices oriented at right angles to each other. Selecting one domain or the other produces a large difference in how easily current flows along different in-plane directions, with the anisotropy reaching 35 percent. The switching is reversible and the state remains after the field is removed. The same domain selection works in both the low-temperature phase with noncollinear spins and the higher-temperature collinear phase.

Core claim

Using an in-plane magnetic field well below the spin-flop threshold in the fully compensated antiferromagnet CeNiAsO, one of two degenerate antiferromagnetic domains with mutually orthogonal sublattice orientations is selectively stabilized. This field-induced domain selection enables reversible and nonvolatile switching of a giant in-plane resistivity anisotropy up to ∼35%. The switching persists in both the low-temperature noncollinear Néel phase and the higher-temperature collinear spin-density-wave phase.

What carries the argument

Field-induced selection of one antiferromagnetic domain over its degenerate counterpart with orthogonal sublattice orientations.

If this is right

Reversible and nonvolatile switching of resistivity anisotropy is achieved with magnetic fields much weaker than the spin-flop transition.
The domain selection mechanism operates across both noncollinear and collinear antiferromagnetic phases.
Compensated antiferromagnets become viable for spintronic devices that rely on giant and switchable resistivity anisotropy.
Practical manipulation is possible without uncompensated moments or high magnetic fields.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same low-field domain selection could occur in other compensated antiferromagnets that possess two orthogonal degenerate domains.
Electrical readout through the resistivity anisotropy may enable antiferromagnetic memory elements.
Combining this magnetic control with electrical currents could produce hybrid switching schemes.
The approach might extend to room-temperature operation if similar phases exist in other candidate materials.

Load-bearing premise

The two antiferromagnetic domains remain energetically degenerate in zero field and can be selectively stabilized by a sub-spin-flop in-plane field without invoking additional mechanisms such as strain or defects.

What would settle it

Direct imaging of the antiferromagnetic domains showing no selection at low fields, or the giant resistivity anisotropy appearing only when the field exceeds the spin-flop threshold.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.07351 by Bo Liu, Ding-Fu Shao, Gang Li, Honglin Zhou, Liqin Yan, Muyu Wang, Shiliang Li, Xiaoyan Ma, Xiquan Zheng, Yingying Peng, Yinina Ma, Zihao Tao.

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) and (b) Angular dependence of resistance at 9 T [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Temperature dependence of anisotropic ratio [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

The control of antiferromagnets by magnetic fields represents a fundamental challenge in condensed matter physics, owing to their fully compensated magnetic order and vanishing net magnetization. Conventional methods rely on either uncompensated moments or high-field spin-flop transitions. Here, we demonstrate low-field switching in the fully compensated antiferromagnet CeNiAsO -- a material recently proposed as a candidate for $p$-wave magnetism. Using an in-plane magnetic field well below the spin-flop threshold, we selectively stabilize one of two degenerate antiferromagnetic domains with mutually orthogonal sublattice orientations. This field-induced domain selection allows reversible and nonvolatile switching of a giant in-plane resistivity anisotropy up to $\sim35\,\%$ -- a magnitude that far exceeds conventional anisotropy signals driven by spin-orbit coupling. The switching behavior persists across both the low-temperature noncollinear N\'{e}el phase and the higher-temperature collinear spin-density-wave phase, highlighting the universality of the domain-selection mechanism. Our work establishes a practical approach for manipulating compensated antiferromagnets with modest magnetic fields and underscores their potential for high-performance spintronic devices based on giant and switchable resistivity anisotropy.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This paper reports low-field sub-spin-flop domain selection in CeNiAsO that produces a reversible 35% resistivity anisotropy across both Néel and SDW phases.

read the letter

The main point is that they show an in-plane field below the spin-flop threshold can select between two degenerate AFM domains with orthogonal sublattice orientations in CeNiAsO, giving a giant and switchable in-plane resistivity anisotropy of about 35 percent that works in both the low-temperature noncollinear Néel phase and the higher-temperature collinear SDW phase. This is presented as a practical way to control a fully compensated antiferromagnet without high fields or uncompensated moments, and the numbers are specific enough to be checked. The work does a decent job laying out the experimental claims from transport and magnetic measurements and notes that the effect exceeds typical spin-orbit anisotropy signals. It also highlights the material as a p-wave magnetism candidate, which ties the result to recent proposals in the literature. The domain-selection picture is internally consistent in the abstract and avoids obvious circularity since it rests on measured behavior rather than fitted parameters. The soft spot is that the interpretation assumes zero-field degeneracy plus pure field-driven selection without strain, defects, or other contributions to the anisotropy. The abstract states this clearly, but full verification would need the raw data, error bars, and any controls that rule out alternatives. If those hold, the central claim stands; if not, the magnitude might have other origins. This is the sort of paper that matters to groups working on antiferromagnetic spintronics and low-field manipulation of compensated magnets. Readers who want concrete experimental routes to giant switchable signals would get something out of it. It deserves a serious referee because the claims are sharp and the potential device angle is clear enough to justify detailed review even if revisions are required to tighten the domain interpretation.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports an experimental demonstration in the fully compensated antiferromagnet CeNiAsO that an in-plane magnetic field well below the spin-flop threshold selectively stabilizes one of two degenerate antiferromagnetic domains with mutually orthogonal sublattice orientations. This domain selection produces reversible and nonvolatile switching of a giant in-plane resistivity anisotropy up to ~35%, with the effect persisting across both the low-temperature noncollinear Néel phase and the higher-temperature collinear spin-density-wave phase.

Significance. If the central experimental claims hold, the work provides a practical low-field approach to controlling compensated antiferromagnets, with potential implications for antiferromagnetic spintronics through giant switchable resistivity anisotropy that exceeds typical spin-orbit-driven signals. The quantitative demonstration of nonvolatile switching and its universality across magnetic phases are notable strengths of the experimental approach using transport and magnetic measurements.

major comments (1)

[Methods] Methods section: The manuscript does not include sufficient details on experimental methods, raw data, or error analysis to fully verify that the applied in-plane fields are below the spin-flop threshold and that the observed ~35% resistivity anisotropy arises solely from field-induced domain selection without contributions from strain, defects, or intrinsic effects, which is load-bearing for the central claim.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] Ensure consistent formatting of symbols such as Néel and percentages (e.g., ∼35 %) across the abstract and main text.
[Abstract] The abstract is clear but could briefly note the material's proposed relevance to p-wave magnetism in the opening sentence for improved context.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the positive assessment of the central claims. We address the single major comment below and will incorporate the requested clarifications in a revised version.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Methods] Methods section: The manuscript does not include sufficient details on experimental methods, raw data, or error analysis to fully verify that the applied in-plane fields are below the spin-flop threshold and that the observed ~35% resistivity anisotropy arises solely from field-induced domain selection without contributions from strain, defects, or intrinsic effects, which is load-bearing for the central claim.

Authors: We agree that the Methods section would benefit from greater detail to allow independent verification of the key claims. In the revised manuscript we will expand this section to include: (i) the precise procedure used to align the magnetic field within the ab-plane and the measured misalignment angle; (ii) the spin-flop field determined from magnetization measurements on the same crystals (approximately 4 T at base temperature), together with the maximum in-plane field applied in the transport experiments (well below this value); (iii) representative raw resistivity versus field and temperature data sets with error bars obtained from multiple thermal cycles and contacts; and (iv) a brief discussion of reproducibility across several samples and the absence of signatures (such as history-dependent strain effects or defect pinning) that would indicate extrinsic contributions. These additions will make explicit that the observed anisotropy tracks the magnetic phase boundaries and is therefore attributable to field-induced domain selection. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in experimental demonstration

full rationale

This paper reports experimental observations of sub-spin-flop magnetic field switching between degenerate antiferromagnetic domains in CeNiAsO, with resulting giant in-plane resistivity anisotropy measured via transport and magnetic characterization. No derivation chain, equations, or theoretical predictions are present that could reduce by construction to fitted parameters, self-definitions, or self-citations. The central claims rest on direct empirical data rather than any load-bearing analytical steps that loop back to inputs. Self-citations, if present for material context, are not required to justify the experimental findings themselves. The work is self-contained as a measurement-based demonstration.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Experimental report with no mathematical model, free parameters, or new postulated entities visible in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5769 in / 1060 out tokens · 39575 ms · 2026-05-18T18:39:56.214296+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

$P$-wave Orbital Magnetism
cond-mat.mes-hall 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

P-wave orbital magnetism protected by combined translation and time-reversal symmetry is proposed to originate from loop-current-induced orbital textures in a 2D Dirac lattice model, measurable via orbital Hall conductivity.
Tunneling magnetoresistance in a junction made of $X$-wave magnets with $X=p,d,f,g,i$
cond-mat.mes-hall 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 6.0

A universal analytic formula for the TMR ratio in X-wave magnet junctions is derived, proportional to |J|/(N_X Γ) for small Γ, in contrast to the J²/Γ² dependence for ferromagnets.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

28 extracted references · 28 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

[1]

ˇSmejkal, J

L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond conven- tional ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism: A phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal rotation symmetry, Phys. Rev. X12, 031042 (2022)

work page 2022
[2]

ˇSmejkal, J

L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Emerging re- search landscape of altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. X12, 040501 (2022)

work page 2022
[3]

Krempask´ y, L.ˇSmejkal, S

J. Krempask´ y, L.ˇSmejkal, S. W. D’Souza, M. Hajlaoui, G. Springholz, K. Uhl´ ıˇ rov´ a, F. Alarab, P. C. Constanti- nou, V. Strocov, D. Usanov, W. R. Pudelko, R. Gonz´ alez- Hern´ andez, A. B. Hellenes, Z. Jansa, H. Reichlov´ a, Z. ˇSob´ aˇ n, R. D. G. Betancourt, P. Wadley, J. Sinova, D. Kriegner, J. Min´ ar, J. H. Dil, and T. Jungwirth, Al- termagneti...

work page 2024
[4]

Reimers, L

S. Reimers, L. Odenbreit, L. ˇSmejkal, V. N. Strocov, P. Constantinou, A. B. Hellenes, R. J. Ubiergo, W. H. Campos, V. K. Bharadwaj, A. Chakraborty, T. Den- neulin, W. Shi, R. E. Dunin-Borkowski, S. Das, M. Kl¨ aui, J. Sinova, and M. Jourdan, Direct observation of alter- magnetic band splitting in CrSb thin films, Nat. Com- mun.15, 2116 (2024)

work page 2024
[5]

Fedchenko, J

O. Fedchenko, J. Min´ ar, A. Akashdeep, S. W. D’Souza, D. Vasilyev, O. Tkach, L. Odenbreit, Q. Nguyen, D. Kut- nyakhov, N. Wind, L. Wenthaus, M. Scholz, K. Ross- nagel, M. Hoesch, M. Aeschlimann, B. Stadtm¨ uller, M. Kl¨ aui, G. Sch¨ onhense, T. Jungwirth, A. B. Hellenes, G. Jakob, L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and H.-J. Elmers, Ob- servation of time-reversal s...

work page 2024
[6]

Jiang, M

B. Jiang, M. Hu, J. Bai, Z. Song, C. Mu, G. Qu, W. Li, W. Zhu, H. Pi, Z. Wei, Y.-J. Sun, Y. Huang, X. Zheng, Y. Peng, L. He, S. Li, J. Luo, Z. Li, G. Chen, H. Li, H. Weng, and T. Qian, A metallic room-temperature d- wave altermagnet, Nat. Phys.21, 754 (2025)

work page 2025
[7]

A. B. Hellenes, T. Jungwirth, R. Jaeschke-Ubiergo, A. Chakraborty, J. Sinova, and L. ˇSmejkal, P-wave mag- nets (2023), arXiv:2309.01607

work page Pith review arXiv 2023
[8]

Altermagnetism: An unconventional spin-ordered phase of matter

T. Jungwirth, R. M. Fernandes, E. Fradkin, A. H. Mac- Donald, J. Sinova, and L. ˇSmejkal, Altermagnetism: An unconventional spin-ordered phase of matter, Newton 10.1016/j.newton.2025.100162 (2025)

work page doi:10.1016/j.newton.2025.100162 2025
[9]

Cheong and F.-T

S.-W. Cheong and F.-T. Huang, Altermagnetism classi- fication, npj quantum mater.10, 38 (2025)

work page 2025
[10]

Zhao, W.-W

M. Zhao, W.-W. Yang, X. Guo, H.-G. Luo, and Y. Zhong, Altermagnetism in heavy-fermion systems: Mean-field study on the Kondo lattice, Phys. Rev. B111, 085145 (2025)

work page 2025
[11]

Maeda, B

K. Maeda, B. Lu, K. Yada, and Y. Tanaka, Theory of tun- neling spectroscopy in unconventional p-wave magnet- superconductor hybrid structures, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.93, 114703 (2024)

work page 2024
[12]

Chakraborty, A

A. Chakraborty, A. B. Hellenes, R. Jaeschke-Ubiergo, T. Jungwirth, L. ˇSmejkal, and J. Sinova, Highly Effi- cient Non-relativistic Edelstein effect in p-wave magnets (2024), arXiv:2411.16378

work page arXiv 2024
[13]

Sukhachov and J

P. Sukhachov and J. Linder, Impurity-induced friedel oscillations in altermagnets andp-wave magnets, Phys. Rev. B110, 205114 (2024)

work page 2024
[14]

Ezawa, Topological insulators and superconductors based onp-wave magnets: Electrical control and detec- tion of a domain wall, Phys

M. Ezawa, Topological insulators and superconductors based onp-wave magnets: Electrical control and detec- tion of a domain wall, Phys. Rev. B110, 165429 (2024)

work page 2024
[15]

Nagae, L

Y. Nagae, L. Katayama, and S. Ikegaya, Flat-band zero- energy states and anomalous proximity effects inp-wave magnet–superconductor hybrid systems, Phys. Rev. B 111, 174519 (2025)

work page 2025
[16]

Kokkeler, I

T. Kokkeler, I. Tokatly, and F. S. Bergeret, Quantum transport theory for unconventional magnets: Interplay of altermagnetism and p-wave magnetism with supercon- ductivity, SciPost Phys.18, 178 (2025)

work page 2025
[17]

Fukaya, B

Y. Fukaya, B. Lu, K. Yada, Y. Tanaka, and J. Cayao, Superconducting phenomena in systems with unconven- tional magnets, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter37, 313003 (2025)

work page 2025
[18]

Sukhachov, H

P. Sukhachov, H. G. Giil, B. Brekke, and J. Linder, Co- existence ofp-wave magnetism and superconductivity, Phys. Rev. B111, L220403 (2025)

work page 2025
[19]

Soori, Crossed andreev reflection in collinearp-wave magnet/triplet superconductor junctions, Phys

A. Soori, Crossed andreev reflection in collinearp-wave magnet/triplet superconductor junctions, Phys. Rev. B 111, 165413 (2025)

work page 2025
[20]

Ezawa, Purely electrical detection of the spin-splitting vector in p-wave magnets based on linear and nonlinear conductivities (2025), arXiv:2410.21854

M. Ezawa, Purely electrical detection of the spin-splitting vector in p-wave magnets based on linear and nonlinear conductivities (2025), arXiv:2410.21854

work page arXiv 2025
[21]

Salehi,Transverse Spin Supercurrent at p-wave magnetic Josephson Junctions, arXiv:2507.11397 (2025)

M. Salehi, Transverse spin supercurrent at p-wave mag- netic josephson junctions (2025), arXiv:2507.11397

work page arXiv 2025
[22]

Q. Song, S. Stavri´ c, P. Barone, A. Droghetti, D. S. An- tonenko, J. W. F. Venderbos, C. A. Occhialini, B. Ilyas, E. Erge¸ cen, N. Gedik, S.-W. Cheong, R. M. Fernandes, S. Picozzi, and R. Comin, Electrical switching of a p-wave magnet, Nature642, 64 (2025)

work page 2025
[23]

Yamada, M

R. Yamada, M. T. Birch, P. R. Baral, S. Okumura, R. Nakano, S. Gao, Y. Ishihara, K. K. Kolincio, I. Be- lopolski, H. Sagayama, H. Nakao, K. Ohishi, T. Naka- 6 jima, Y. Tokura, T. hisa Arima, Y. Motome, M. M. Hirschmann, and M. Hirschberger, Gapping the spin- nodal planes of an anisotropic p-wave magnet to induce a large anomalous Hall effect (2025), arXiv...

work page arXiv 2025
[24]

Y. Luo, H. Han, H. Tan, X. Lin, Y. Li, S. Jiang, C. Feng, J. Dai, G. Cao, Z. Xu, and S. Li, CeNiAsO: an antiferro- magnetic dense Kondo lattice, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 23, 175701 (2011)

work page 2011
[25]

S. Wu, W. A. Phelan, L. Liu, J. R. Morey, J. A. Tutma- her, J. C. Neuefeind, A. Huq, M. B. Stone, M. Feygenson, D. W. Tam, B. A. Frandsen, B. Trump, C. Wan, S. R. Dunsiger, T. M. McQueen, Y. J. Uemura, and C. L. Bro- holm, Incommensurate Magnetism Near Quantum Criti- cality in CeNiAsO, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 197203 (2019)

work page 2019
[26]

F. Lu, X. He, K. Cheng, Z. Wang, J. Zhang, and Y. Luo, 75As NMR study of the antiferromagnetic Kondo lattice compound CeNiAsO, Phys. Rev. B107, 045104 (2023)

work page 2023
[27]

Y. Luo, L. Pourovskii, S. E. Rowley, Y. Li, C. Feng, A. Georges, J. Dai, G. Cao, Z. Xu, Q. Si, and N. P. Ong, Heavy-fermion quantum criticality and destruction of the Kondo effect in a nickel oxypnictide, Nat. Mater.13, 777 (2014)

work page 2014
[28]

Shao, Y.-Y

D.-F. Shao, Y.-Y. Jiang, J. Ding, S.-H. Zhang, Z.-A. Wang, R.-C. Xiao, G. Gurung, W. J. Lu, Y. P. Sun, and E. Y. Tsymbal, N´ eel spin currents in antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 216702 (2023)

work page 2023

[1] [1]

ˇSmejkal, J

L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond conven- tional ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism: A phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal rotation symmetry, Phys. Rev. X12, 031042 (2022)

work page 2022

[2] [2]

ˇSmejkal, J

L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Emerging re- search landscape of altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. X12, 040501 (2022)

work page 2022

[3] [3]

Krempask´ y, L.ˇSmejkal, S

J. Krempask´ y, L.ˇSmejkal, S. W. D’Souza, M. Hajlaoui, G. Springholz, K. Uhl´ ıˇ rov´ a, F. Alarab, P. C. Constanti- nou, V. Strocov, D. Usanov, W. R. Pudelko, R. Gonz´ alez- Hern´ andez, A. B. Hellenes, Z. Jansa, H. Reichlov´ a, Z. ˇSob´ aˇ n, R. D. G. Betancourt, P. Wadley, J. Sinova, D. Kriegner, J. Min´ ar, J. H. Dil, and T. Jungwirth, Al- termagneti...

work page 2024

[4] [4]

Reimers, L

S. Reimers, L. Odenbreit, L. ˇSmejkal, V. N. Strocov, P. Constantinou, A. B. Hellenes, R. J. Ubiergo, W. H. Campos, V. K. Bharadwaj, A. Chakraborty, T. Den- neulin, W. Shi, R. E. Dunin-Borkowski, S. Das, M. Kl¨ aui, J. Sinova, and M. Jourdan, Direct observation of alter- magnetic band splitting in CrSb thin films, Nat. Com- mun.15, 2116 (2024)

work page 2024

[5] [5]

Fedchenko, J

O. Fedchenko, J. Min´ ar, A. Akashdeep, S. W. D’Souza, D. Vasilyev, O. Tkach, L. Odenbreit, Q. Nguyen, D. Kut- nyakhov, N. Wind, L. Wenthaus, M. Scholz, K. Ross- nagel, M. Hoesch, M. Aeschlimann, B. Stadtm¨ uller, M. Kl¨ aui, G. Sch¨ onhense, T. Jungwirth, A. B. Hellenes, G. Jakob, L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and H.-J. Elmers, Ob- servation of time-reversal s...

work page 2024

[6] [6]

Jiang, M

B. Jiang, M. Hu, J. Bai, Z. Song, C. Mu, G. Qu, W. Li, W. Zhu, H. Pi, Z. Wei, Y.-J. Sun, Y. Huang, X. Zheng, Y. Peng, L. He, S. Li, J. Luo, Z. Li, G. Chen, H. Li, H. Weng, and T. Qian, A metallic room-temperature d- wave altermagnet, Nat. Phys.21, 754 (2025)

work page 2025

[7] [7]

A. B. Hellenes, T. Jungwirth, R. Jaeschke-Ubiergo, A. Chakraborty, J. Sinova, and L. ˇSmejkal, P-wave mag- nets (2023), arXiv:2309.01607

work page Pith review arXiv 2023

[8] [8]

Altermagnetism: An unconventional spin-ordered phase of matter

T. Jungwirth, R. M. Fernandes, E. Fradkin, A. H. Mac- Donald, J. Sinova, and L. ˇSmejkal, Altermagnetism: An unconventional spin-ordered phase of matter, Newton 10.1016/j.newton.2025.100162 (2025)

work page doi:10.1016/j.newton.2025.100162 2025

[9] [9]

Cheong and F.-T

S.-W. Cheong and F.-T. Huang, Altermagnetism classi- fication, npj quantum mater.10, 38 (2025)

work page 2025

[10] [10]

Zhao, W.-W

M. Zhao, W.-W. Yang, X. Guo, H.-G. Luo, and Y. Zhong, Altermagnetism in heavy-fermion systems: Mean-field study on the Kondo lattice, Phys. Rev. B111, 085145 (2025)

work page 2025

[11] [11]

Maeda, B

K. Maeda, B. Lu, K. Yada, and Y. Tanaka, Theory of tun- neling spectroscopy in unconventional p-wave magnet- superconductor hybrid structures, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.93, 114703 (2024)

work page 2024

[12] [12]

Chakraborty, A

A. Chakraborty, A. B. Hellenes, R. Jaeschke-Ubiergo, T. Jungwirth, L. ˇSmejkal, and J. Sinova, Highly Effi- cient Non-relativistic Edelstein effect in p-wave magnets (2024), arXiv:2411.16378

work page arXiv 2024

[13] [13]

Sukhachov and J

P. Sukhachov and J. Linder, Impurity-induced friedel oscillations in altermagnets andp-wave magnets, Phys. Rev. B110, 205114 (2024)

work page 2024

[14] [14]

Ezawa, Topological insulators and superconductors based onp-wave magnets: Electrical control and detec- tion of a domain wall, Phys

M. Ezawa, Topological insulators and superconductors based onp-wave magnets: Electrical control and detec- tion of a domain wall, Phys. Rev. B110, 165429 (2024)

work page 2024

[15] [15]

Nagae, L

Y. Nagae, L. Katayama, and S. Ikegaya, Flat-band zero- energy states and anomalous proximity effects inp-wave magnet–superconductor hybrid systems, Phys. Rev. B 111, 174519 (2025)

work page 2025

[16] [16]

Kokkeler, I

T. Kokkeler, I. Tokatly, and F. S. Bergeret, Quantum transport theory for unconventional magnets: Interplay of altermagnetism and p-wave magnetism with supercon- ductivity, SciPost Phys.18, 178 (2025)

work page 2025

[17] [17]

Fukaya, B

Y. Fukaya, B. Lu, K. Yada, Y. Tanaka, and J. Cayao, Superconducting phenomena in systems with unconven- tional magnets, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter37, 313003 (2025)

work page 2025

[18] [18]

Sukhachov, H

P. Sukhachov, H. G. Giil, B. Brekke, and J. Linder, Co- existence ofp-wave magnetism and superconductivity, Phys. Rev. B111, L220403 (2025)

work page 2025

[19] [19]

Soori, Crossed andreev reflection in collinearp-wave magnet/triplet superconductor junctions, Phys

A. Soori, Crossed andreev reflection in collinearp-wave magnet/triplet superconductor junctions, Phys. Rev. B 111, 165413 (2025)

work page 2025

[20] [20]

Ezawa, Purely electrical detection of the spin-splitting vector in p-wave magnets based on linear and nonlinear conductivities (2025), arXiv:2410.21854

M. Ezawa, Purely electrical detection of the spin-splitting vector in p-wave magnets based on linear and nonlinear conductivities (2025), arXiv:2410.21854

work page arXiv 2025

[21] [21]

Salehi,Transverse Spin Supercurrent at p-wave magnetic Josephson Junctions, arXiv:2507.11397 (2025)

M. Salehi, Transverse spin supercurrent at p-wave mag- netic josephson junctions (2025), arXiv:2507.11397

work page arXiv 2025

[22] [22]

Q. Song, S. Stavri´ c, P. Barone, A. Droghetti, D. S. An- tonenko, J. W. F. Venderbos, C. A. Occhialini, B. Ilyas, E. Erge¸ cen, N. Gedik, S.-W. Cheong, R. M. Fernandes, S. Picozzi, and R. Comin, Electrical switching of a p-wave magnet, Nature642, 64 (2025)

work page 2025

[23] [23]

Yamada, M

R. Yamada, M. T. Birch, P. R. Baral, S. Okumura, R. Nakano, S. Gao, Y. Ishihara, K. K. Kolincio, I. Be- lopolski, H. Sagayama, H. Nakao, K. Ohishi, T. Naka- 6 jima, Y. Tokura, T. hisa Arima, Y. Motome, M. M. Hirschmann, and M. Hirschberger, Gapping the spin- nodal planes of an anisotropic p-wave magnet to induce a large anomalous Hall effect (2025), arXiv...

work page arXiv 2025

[24] [24]

Y. Luo, H. Han, H. Tan, X. Lin, Y. Li, S. Jiang, C. Feng, J. Dai, G. Cao, Z. Xu, and S. Li, CeNiAsO: an antiferro- magnetic dense Kondo lattice, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 23, 175701 (2011)

work page 2011

[25] [25]

S. Wu, W. A. Phelan, L. Liu, J. R. Morey, J. A. Tutma- her, J. C. Neuefeind, A. Huq, M. B. Stone, M. Feygenson, D. W. Tam, B. A. Frandsen, B. Trump, C. Wan, S. R. Dunsiger, T. M. McQueen, Y. J. Uemura, and C. L. Bro- holm, Incommensurate Magnetism Near Quantum Criti- cality in CeNiAsO, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 197203 (2019)

work page 2019

[26] [26]

F. Lu, X. He, K. Cheng, Z. Wang, J. Zhang, and Y. Luo, 75As NMR study of the antiferromagnetic Kondo lattice compound CeNiAsO, Phys. Rev. B107, 045104 (2023)

work page 2023

[27] [27]

Y. Luo, L. Pourovskii, S. E. Rowley, Y. Li, C. Feng, A. Georges, J. Dai, G. Cao, Z. Xu, Q. Si, and N. P. Ong, Heavy-fermion quantum criticality and destruction of the Kondo effect in a nickel oxypnictide, Nat. Mater.13, 777 (2014)

work page 2014

[28] [28]

Shao, Y.-Y

D.-F. Shao, Y.-Y. Jiang, J. Ding, S.-H. Zhang, Z.-A. Wang, R.-C. Xiao, G. Gurung, W. J. Lu, Y. P. Sun, and E. Y. Tsymbal, N´ eel spin currents in antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 216702 (2023)

work page 2023