Forecasting Generative Amplification
read the original abstract
Generative networks are perfect tools to enhance the speed and precision of LHC simulations. It is important to understand their statistical precision, especially when generating events beyond the size of the training dataset. We present two complementary methods to estimate the amplification factor without large holdout datasets. Averaging amplification uses Bayesian networks or ensembling to estimate amplification from the precision of integrals over given phase-space volumes. Differential amplification uses hypothesis testing to quantify amplification without any resolution loss. Applied to state-of-the-art event generators, both methods indicate that amplification is possible in specific regions of phase space, but not yet across the entire distribution.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
One Generator, Any Process: LLM-Conditioning for the LHC
LLM embeddings condition generative networks for LHC events, yielding faster convergence, higher quality, and generalization to unseen processes.
-
CaloTrilogy: Toward a Breakthrough in One-Step, End-to-End, Physics-Guided Shower Generation for Modern Calorimeters
Presents CaloTrilogy, a unified one-step generative model for high-granularity calorimeter showers that combines velocity field integration, learned priors, and physics losses to match SOTA quality.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.