The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2509.11068 · v1 · pith:GYA6U77B · submitted 2025-09-14 · cs.AI

Tractable Asymmetric Verification for Large Language Models via Deterministic Replicability

Reviewed by Pithpith:GYA6U77Bopen to challenge →

classification cs.AI
keywords verificationmodelssystemstractableasymmetricchallengecostdeterministic
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

The landscape of Large Language Models (LLMs) shifts rapidly towards dynamic, multi-agent systems. This introduces a fundamental challenge in establishing computational trust, specifically how one agent can verify that another's output was genuinely produced by a claimed LLM, and not falsified or generated by a cheaper or inferior model. To address this challenge, this paper proposes a verification framework that achieves tractable asymmetric effort, where the cost to verify a computation is substantially lower than the cost to perform it. Our approach is built upon the principle of deterministic replicability, a property inherent to autoregressive models that strictly necessitates a computationally homogeneous environment where all agents operate on identical hardware and software stacks. Within this defined context, our framework enables multiple validators to probabilistically audit small, random segments of an LLM's output and it distributes the verification workload effectively. The simulations demonstrated that targeted verification can be over 12 times faster than full regeneration, with tunable parameters to adjust the detection probability. By establishing a tractable mechanism for auditable LLM systems, our work offers a foundational layer for responsible AI and serves as a cornerstone for future research into the more complex, heterogeneous multi-agent systems.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. When Planning Fails Despite Correct Execution: On Epistemic Calibration for LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Introduces EPC-AW to mitigate epistemic miscalibration in LLM multi-agent planning via consistency-based selection and refinement, reporting 9.75% average success improvement.