pith. sign in

arxiv: 2511.23371 · v3 · submitted 2025-11-28 · ⚛️ physics.soc-ph

Multilayer network science: theory, methods, and applications

Alberto Aleta , Andreia Sofia Teixeira , Guilherme Ferraz de Arruda , Andrea Baronchelli , Alain Barrat , J\'anos Kert\'esz , Albert D\'iaz-Guilera , Oriol Artime
show 9 more authors
Michele Starnini Giovanni Petri M\'arton Karsai Siddharth Patwardhan Kathryn Coronges Ann McCranie Alessandro Vespignani Yamir Moreno Santo Fortunato
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 04:15 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.soc-ph
keywords multilayer networkscomplex systemsnetwork sciencecommunity detectiondynamical processestemporal networkshigher-order interactionsnetwork applications
0
0 comments X

The pith

Multilayer network science provides a framework for analysing interconnected and interdependent complex systems.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This review establishes multilayer network science as essential for modelling systems where entities interact through multiple distinct channels rather than a single type of link. It surveys theoretical and methodological progress in community detection, dynamical processes, temporal networks, higher-order interactions, and machine-learning techniques that exploit rich heterogeneous data. The authors then map concrete applications across infrastructure, spreading processes, social science, economics, ecology, science studies, medicine, and neuroscience. If the covered developments hold, the framework shifts analysis from isolated networks toward systems whose layers influence one another.

Core claim

The paper claims that multilayer network science has emerged as a central framework for analysing interconnected and interdependent complex systems, with its relevance growing due to the availability of rich, heterogeneous data that reveals inherently multilayered organisation in real-world networks. It summarises recent advances on the theoretical and methodological side in community detection, dynamical processes, temporal networks, higher-order interactions, and machine-learning-based approaches, and on the application side across interdependent infrastructures, spreading dynamics, computational social science, economic and financial systems, ecological and climate networks, science-of-s,

What carries the argument

The multilayer network representation, in which the same nodes connect through distinct layers that capture different interaction types and thereby expose interdependencies across layers.

If this is right

  • Standardised datasets and software become necessary to compare multilayer methods across studies.
  • Deeper integration of temporal and higher-order structures yields more accurate models of evolving systems.
  • The field shifts from descriptive to genuinely predictive models of complex systems.
  • Applications in network medicine and neuroscience gain from accounting for multiple interaction types simultaneously.
  • Spreading dynamics and infrastructure resilience analyses improve by modelling cross-layer dependencies.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Multilayer models could be tested for forecasting cascading failures in power and transport systems by comparing predicted versus observed outage patterns.
  • Integration with existing single-layer tools might reveal when adding layers changes community structure enough to alter policy recommendations in social networks.
  • Climate and ecological applications could be extended to predict how disruptions in one layer propagate to others, such as species loss affecting food webs and carbon cycles.
  • Predictive models might be validated by checking whether multilayer forecasts outperform single-layer ones on held-out financial or epidemic data.

Load-bearing premise

The selected advances in theory, methods, and applications are representative and balanced without major omissions in coverage of the literature.

What would settle it

An independent literature survey that documents large, systematically omitted subfields or that shows single-layer models suffice for most cited applications would undermine the claim that multilayer networks form a central framework.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.23371 by Alain Barrat, Albert D\'iaz-Guilera, Alberto Aleta, Alessandro Vespignani, Andrea Baronchelli, Andreia Sofia Teixeira, Ann McCranie, Giovanni Petri, Guilherme Ferraz de Arruda, J\'anos Kert\'esz, Kathryn Coronges, M\'arton Karsai, Michele Starnini, Oriol Artime, Santo Fortunato, Siddharth Patwardhan, Yamir Moreno.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Comparison between the second smallest eigenval [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Eigenratio [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Multilayer communities. The continuous (red) contours indicate communities. (a) Intralayer communities group state [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Schematic representation of different networked sys [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. General approach to multiplex embedding. Given a multiplex network, the first step involves identifying node pairs [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Schematic representation of an epidemic-economic model. The figure illustrates the interplay between two very [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Multilayer representation of Madrid’s public transportation system in 2016. The network is organized into three layers, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Multilayer network featuring different omics (genes, proteins, metabolites) and their mutual interactions/associations. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Multilayer network science has emerged as a central framework for analysing interconnected and interdependent complex systems. Its relevance has grown substantially with the increasing availability of rich, heterogeneous data, which makes it possible to uncover and exploit the inherently multilayered organisation of many real-world networks. In this review, we summarise recent developments in the field. On the theoretical and methodological front, we outline core concepts and survey advances in community detection, dynamical processes, temporal networks, higher-order interactions, and machine-learning-based approaches. On the application side, we discuss progress across diverse domains, including interdependent infrastructures, spreading dynamics, computational social science, economic and financial systems, ecological and climate networks, science-of-science studies, network medicine, and network neuroscience. We conclude with a forward-looking perspective, emphasizing the need for standardised datasets and software, deeper integration of temporal and higher-order structures, and a transition toward genuinely predictive models of complex systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a narrative review asserting that multilayer network science has emerged as a central framework for analysing interconnected and interdependent complex systems. It summarises recent theoretical and methodological advances in core concepts, community detection, dynamical processes, temporal networks, higher-order interactions, and machine-learning approaches, while surveying applications across interdependent infrastructures, spreading dynamics, computational social science, economic and financial systems, ecological and climate networks, science-of-science studies, network medicine, and network neuroscience. The review closes with forward-looking remarks on the need for standardised datasets and software, deeper integration of temporal and higher-order structures, and a shift toward predictive models.

Significance. If the selected advances prove representative, the review could serve as a useful consolidation of the field, facilitating entry for new researchers and highlighting cross-domain applications of multilayer networks. The interdisciplinary scope and emphasis on future directions toward predictive modelling are strengths that could increase the manuscript's utility as a reference.

major comments (1)
  1. The central claim that multilayer network science 'has emerged as a central framework' depends on the representativeness of the surveyed advances in theory, methods, and applications. As a narrative review without stated inclusion criteria, citation thresholds, or coverage metrics, the selection process is not justified, raising the risk that important recent strands (e.g., multilayer hypergraph models or causal inference methods) receive insufficient attention.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract and conclusion could more explicitly link the listed application domains to specific methodological advances discussed earlier to strengthen the narrative flow.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and insightful report. We address the major comment below, clarifying the scope of our narrative review and outlining targeted revisions to improve transparency.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim that multilayer network science 'has emerged as a central framework' depends on the representativeness of the surveyed advances in theory, methods, and applications. As a narrative review without stated inclusion criteria, citation thresholds, or coverage metrics, the selection process is not justified, raising the risk that important recent strands (e.g., multilayer hypergraph models or causal inference methods) receive insufficient attention.

    Authors: We appreciate this observation regarding the justification of our selection. Our manuscript is explicitly framed as a narrative review, which in the network science literature commonly relies on expert curation to highlight influential developments and provide an accessible synthesis rather than exhaustive enumeration. This approach aligns with similar reviews in the field that prioritize coherence and cross-domain connections over systematic protocols. Nevertheless, to directly address the concern, we will revise the introduction to include an explicit statement of scope, explaining that topics were chosen to represent core theoretical advances and high-impact applications based on their prominence in recent literature and their relevance to the review's narrative arc. We will also acknowledge that the review is not exhaustive. On the specific examples raised, the higher-order interactions section already covers related structures; we will expand it with additional references to multilayer hypergraph models. For causal inference methods, we will add a concise paragraph within the machine-learning approaches section to note emerging integrations with multilayer frameworks. These changes will better support the central claim while preserving the review's intended length and focus. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: review aggregates external literature

full rationale

This manuscript is a narrative review that summarizes theoretical and applied advances in multilayer networks by citing prior external work across community detection, dynamics, temporal networks, and domain applications. The central framing that multilayer network science has emerged as a central framework rests on the aggregation of that cited literature rather than on any internal derivation, fitted parameter, self-defined quantity, or uniqueness theorem internal to the paper. No equations, predictions, or ansatzes are presented that reduce to the paper's own inputs by construction, and any self-citations that may exist function as standard scholarly references rather than load-bearing justifications that close a circular loop. The representativeness of topic selection is a matter of review scope, not a circularity issue under the defined criteria.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

As a review paper the contribution is synthesis of existing work rather than new derivations. No free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced in the provided abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5532 in / 927 out tokens · 34521 ms · 2026-05-17T04:15:31.291355+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Symmetry-Breaking and Hysteresis in a Duplex Voter Model

    nlin.AO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A duplex voter model on multiplex networks exhibits spontaneous symmetry-breaking and a cusp bifurcation with noise that unfolds explosive versus non-explosive transitions.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

299 extracted references · 299 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Dorogovtsev and Jos´ e F

    Sergei N. Dorogovtsev and Jos´ e F. F. Mendes.Evolution of networks: From biological nets to the Internet and WWW. Oxford University Press, 2013

    work page 2013

  2. [2]

    Cambridge university press Cambridge, 2004

    Alessandro Vespignani and R Pastor-Satorras.Evolu- tion and Structure of the Internet. Cambridge university press Cambridge, 2004

    work page 2004

  3. [3]

    Oxford Univer- sity Press, Oxford, UK, 2007

    Guido Caldarelli.Scale-free networks. Oxford Univer- sity Press, Oxford, UK, 2007

    work page 2007

  4. [4]

    Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2008

    Alain Barrat, Marc Barth´ elemy, and Alessandro Vespig- nani.Dynamical processes on complex networks. Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2008

    work page 2008

  5. [5]

    Cambridge Uni- versity Press, Cambridge, UK, 2010

    Reuven Cohen and Shlomo Havlin.Complex Networks: Structure, Robustness and Function. Cambridge Uni- versity Press, Cambridge, UK, 2010. 22

    work page 2010

  6. [6]

    Oxford University Press, Inc., New York, NY, USA, 2018

    Mark Newman.Networks: An Introduction. Oxford University Press, Inc., New York, NY, USA, 2018

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    Oxford University Press, UK, 2011

    Ernesto Estrada.The structure of complex networks: theory and applications. Oxford University Press, UK, 2011

    work page 2011

  8. [8]

    Knight.A First Course in Network Theory

    Ernesto Estrada and Philip A. Knight.A First Course in Network Theory. Oxford University Press, UK, 2015

    work page 2015

  9. [9]

    Cambridge university press, 2016

    Albert-L´ aszl´ o Barab´ asi.Network science. Cambridge university press, 2016

    work page 2016

  10. [10]

    Complex networks: principles, methods and applica- tions

    Vito Latora, Vincenzo Nicosia, and Giovanni Russo. Complex networks: principles, methods and applica- tions. Cambridge University Press, 2017

    work page 2017

  11. [11]

    Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2020

    Filippo Menczer, Santo Fortunato, and Clayton A Davis.A First Course in Network Science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2020

    work page 2020

  12. [12]

    Cambridge University Press, 2024

    James Bagrow and Yong-Yeol Ahn.Working with Net- work Data. Cambridge University Press, 2024

    work page 2024

  13. [13]

    Watts and Steven H

    Duncan J. Watts and Steven H. Strogatz. Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks.Nature, 393:440– 442, June 1998

    work page 1998

  14. [14]

    Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks.Science, 286(5439):509– 512, October 1999

    Albert-L´ aszl´ o Barab´ asi and R´ eka Albert. Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks.Science, 286(5439):509– 512, October 1999

    work page 1999

  15. [15]

    Multi- layer networks.J

    Mikko Kivel¨ a, Alex Arenas, Marc Barthelemy, James P Gleeson, Yamir Moreno, and Mason A Porter. Multi- layer networks.J. Complex Netw., 2(3):203–271, 2014

    work page 2014

  16. [16]

    Boccaletti, G

    S. Boccaletti, G. Bianconi, R. Criado, C.I. del Genio, J. G´ omez-Garde˜ nes, M. Romance, I. Sendi˜ na-Nadal, Z. Wang, and M. Zanin. The structure and dynamics of multilayer networks.Phys. Rep., 544(1):1–122, 2014

    work page 2014

  17. [17]

    Structural measures for multiplex networks.Physical Review E, 89(3):032804, 2014

    Federico Battiston, Vincenzo Nicosia, and Vito Latora. Structural measures for multiplex networks.Physical Review E, 89(3):032804, 2014

    work page 2014

  18. [18]

    Oxford university press, 2018

    Ginestra Bianconi.Multilayer networks: structure and function. Oxford university press, 2018

    work page 2018

  19. [19]

    Multilayer Networks in a Nutshell.Annu

    Alberto Aleta and Yamir Moreno. Multilayer Networks in a Nutshell.Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys., 10:45–62, March 2019

    work page 2019

  20. [20]

    Elements in Structure and Dynamics of Complex Networks

    Oriol Artime, Barbara Benigni, Giulia Bertagnolli, Va- leria d’Andrea, Riccardo Gallotti, Arsham Ghavasieh, Sebastian Raimondo, and Manlio De Domenico.Mul- tilayer network science. Elements in Structure and Dynamics of Complex Networks. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, September 2022

    work page 2022

  21. [21]

    More is different in real-world multilayer networks.Nature Physics, 19(9):1247–1262, September 2023

    Manlio De Domenico. More is different in real-world multilayer networks.Nature Physics, 19(9):1247–1262, September 2023

    work page 2023

  22. [22]

    Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, UK, November 1994

    Stanley Wasserman and Katherine Faust.Social Net- work Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, UK, November 1994

    work page 1994

  23. [23]

    Multirelational organization of large-scale social net- works in an online world.Proc

    Michael Szell, Renaud Lambiotte, and Stefan Thurner. Multirelational organization of large-scale social net- works in an online world.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 107(31):13636–13641, August 2010

    work page 2010

  24. [24]

    Buldyrev, Roni Parshani, Gerald Paul, H

    Sergey V. Buldyrev, Roni Parshani, Gerald Paul, H. Eu- gene Stanley, and Shlomo Havlin. Catastrophic cas- cade of failures in interdependent networks.Nature, 464(7291):1025–1028, April 2010. Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    work page 2010

  25. [25]

    The fragility of interdepen- dency.Nature, 464:984–985, April 2010

    Alessandro Vespignani. The fragility of interdepen- dency.Nature, 464:984–985, April 2010

    work page 2010

  26. [26]

    Porter, Sergio G´ omez, and Alex Arenas

    Manlio De Domenico, Albert Sol´ e-Ribalta, Emanuele Cozzo, Mikko Kivel¨ a, Yamir Moreno, Mason A. Porter, Sergio G´ omez, and Alex Arenas. Mathematical for- mulation of multilayer networks.Physical Review X, 3:041022, Dec 2013

    work page 2013

  27. [27]

    P´ erez-Vicente, Yamir Moreno, and Alex Arenas

    Sergio G´ omez, Albert D´ ıaz-Guilera, Jes´ us G´ omez- Garde˜ nes, Conrad J. P´ erez-Vicente, Yamir Moreno, and Alex Arenas. Diffusion dynamics on multiplex networks. Phys. Rev. Lett., 110:028701, Jan 2013

    work page 2013

  28. [28]

    Kouvaris, Albert D´ ıaz-Guilera, Sergio G´ omez, and Alex Arenas

    Albert Sol´ e-Ribalta, Manlio De Domenico, Nikos E. Kouvaris, Albert D´ ıaz-Guilera, Sergio G´ omez, and Alex Arenas. Spectral properties of the laplacian of multiplex networks.Phys. Rev. E, 88:032807, Sep 2013

    work page 2013

  29. [29]

    Link prediction in multiplex networks via triadic closure.Phys

    Alberto Aleta, Marta Tuninetti, Daniela Paolotti, Yamir Moreno, and Michele Starnini. Link prediction in multiplex networks via triadic closure.Phys. Rev. Res., 2(4):042029, November 2020

    work page 2020

  30. [30]

    Ranking in interconnected multilayer networks reveals versatile nodes.Nature Communications, 6(1):6868, April 2015

    Manlio De Domenico, Albert Sol´ e-Ribalta, Elisa Omodei, Sergio G´ omez, and Alex Arenas. Ranking in interconnected multilayer networks reveals versatile nodes.Nature Communications, 6(1):6868, April 2015

    work page 2015

  31. [31]

    Eigenvector centrality of nodes in multiplex networks

    Luis Sol´ a, Miguel Romance, Regino Criado, Julio Flo- res, Alejandro Garc´ ıa del Amo, and Stefano Boccaletti. Eigenvector centrality of nodes in multiplex networks. Chaos, 23(3):033131, 2013

    work page 2013

  32. [32]

    Porter, and Peter J

    Dane Taylor, Mason A. Porter, and Peter J. Mucha. Tunable eigenvector-based centralities for multiplex and temporal networks.Multiscale Modeling & Simulation, 19(1):113–147, 2021

    work page 2021

  33. [33]

    Mondrag´ on, Pietro Panzarasa, and Ginestra Bianconi

    Arda Halu, Ra´ ul J. Mondrag´ on, Pietro Panzarasa, and Ginestra Bianconi. Multiplex Pagerank.PloS one, 8(10):e78293, 2013

    work page 2013

  34. [34]

    Random walk centrality in interconnected multilayer networks.Physica D, 323:73– 79, 2016

    Albert Sol´ e-Ribalta, Manlio De Domenico, Sergio G´ omez, and Alex Arenas. Random walk centrality in interconnected multilayer networks.Physica D, 323:73– 79, 2016

    work page 2016

  35. [35]

    P´ erez- Vicente

    Alex Arenas, Albert D´ ıaz-Guilera, and Conrad J. P´ erez- Vicente. Synchronization reveals topological scales in complex networks.Physical Review Letters, 96:114102, 2006

    work page 2006

  36. [36]

    Almendral and Albert D´ ıaz-Guilera

    Juan A. Almendral and Albert D´ ıaz-Guilera. Dynam- ical and spectral properties of complex networks.New Journal of Physics, 9(6):187, 2007

    work page 2007

  37. [37]

    Algebraic connectivity of graphs

    Miroslav Fiedler. Algebraic connectivity of graphs. Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal, 23(2):298–305, 1973

    work page 1973

  38. [38]

    Spectral properties of networks with community struc- ture.Physical Review E, 80:056114, 11 2009

    Sanjeev Chauhan, Michelle Girvan, and Edward Ott. Spectral properties of networks with community struc- ture.Physical Review E, 80:056114, 11 2009

    work page 2009

  39. [39]

    Abrupt transition in the structural formation of interconnected networks

    Filippo Radicchi and Alex Arenas. Abrupt transition in the structural formation of interconnected networks. Nature Physics, 9(11):717, 2013

    work page 2013

  40. [40]

    Pecora and Thomas L

    Louis M. Pecora and Thomas L. Carroll. Master stabil- ity functions for synchronized coupled systems.Physical Review Letters, 80:2109–2112, Mar 1998

    work page 1998

  41. [41]

    Robustness and re- silience of complex networks.Nature Reviews Physics, 6(2):114–131, 2024

    Oriol Artime, Marco Grassia, Manlio De Domenico, James P Gleeson, Hern´ an A Makse, Giuseppe Mangioni, Matjaˇ z Perc, and Filippo Radicchi. Robustness and re- silience of complex networks.Nature Reviews Physics, 6(2):114–131, 2024

    work page 2024

  42. [42]

    Buldyrev, H

    Jianxi Gao, Sergey V. Buldyrev, H. Eugene Stanley, and Shlomo Havlin. Networks formed from interdependent networks.Nature Physics, 8(1):40, 2012

    work page 2012

  43. [43]

    Schieber, Laura Carpi, Albert D´ ıaz-Guilera, Panos M

    Tiago A. Schieber, Laura Carpi, Albert D´ ıaz-Guilera, Panos M. Pardalos, Cristina Masoller, and Mart´ ın G. Ravetti. Quantification of network structural dissimi- 23 larities.Nature Communications, 8(1):13928, 2017

    work page 2017

  44. [44]

    Enhanc- ing transport properties in interconnected systems with- out altering their structure.Physical Review Research, 2:013155, 2020

    Arsham Ghavasieh and Manlio De Domenico. Enhanc- ing transport properties in interconnected systems with- out altering their structure.Physical Review Research, 2:013155, 2020

    work page 2020

  45. [45]

    Dynamical and correlation properties of the internet.Physical Review Letters, 87(25):258701, 2001

    Romualdo Pastor-Satorras, Alexei V´ azquez, and Alessandro Vespignani. Dynamical and correlation properties of the internet.Physical Review Letters, 87(25):258701, 2001

    work page 2001

  46. [46]

    Mark E. J. Newman. Assortative mixing in networks. Physical Review Letters, 89(20):208701, 2002

    work page 2002

  47. [47]

    Roxana Pamfil, Sam D

    A. Roxana Pamfil, Sam D. Howison, Renaud Lam- biotte, and Mason A. Porter. Relating modularity max- imization and stochastic block models in multilayer net- works.SIAM Journal on Mathematics of Data Science, 1(4):667–698, 2019

    work page 2019

  48. [48]

    Measuring and mod- eling correlations in multiplex networks.Physical Re- view E, 92(3):032805, 2015

    Vincenzo Nicosia and Vito Latora. Measuring and mod- eling correlations in multiplex networks.Physical Re- view E, 92(3):032805, 2015

    work page 2015

  49. [49]

    James, and Raissa M

    Haochen Wu, Ryan G. James, and Raissa M. D’Souza. Correlated structural evolution within multiplex net- works.Journal of Complex Networks, 8(2):cnaa014, 2020

    work page 2020

  50. [50]

    Growing multiplex networks.Physi- cal Review Letters, 111:058701, 2013

    Vincenzo Nicosia, Ginestra Bianconi, Vito Latora, and Marc Barthelemy. Growing multiplex networks.Physi- cal Review Letters, 111:058701, 2013

    work page 2013

  51. [51]

    Statistical mechanics of multiplex networks: entropy and overlap.Physical Review E, 87:062806, 2013

    Ginestra Bianconi. Statistical mechanics of multiplex networks: entropy and overlap.Physical Review E, 87:062806, 2013

    work page 2013

  52. [52]

    Mondrag´ on, and Ginestra Bianconi

    Giulia Menichetti, Daniel Remondini, Pietro Panzarasa, Ra´ ul J. Mondrag´ on, and Ginestra Bianconi. Weighted multiplex networks.PloS one, 9(6):e97857, 2014

    work page 2014

  53. [53]

    Kyu-Min Lee, Jung Yeol Kim, Won-kuk Cho, Kwang-Il Goh, and I. M. Kim. Correlated multiplexity and con- nectivity of multiplex random networks.New Journal of Physics, 14(3):033027, 2012

    work page 2012

  54. [54]

    Community detection in multi-layer graphs: A survey.ACM SIGMOD Record, 44(3):37–48, 2015

    Jungeun Kim and Jae-Gil Lee. Community detection in multi-layer graphs: A survey.ACM SIGMOD Record, 44(3):37–48, 2015

    work page 2015

  55. [55]

    Community detection in multiplex networks.ACM Computing Sur- veys (CSUR), 54(3):1–35, 2021

    Matteo Magnani, Obaida Hanteer, Roberto Interdo- nato, Luca Rossi, and Andrea Tagarelli. Community detection in multiplex networks.ACM Computing Sur- veys (CSUR), 54(3):1–35, 2021

    work page 2021

  56. [56]

    A survey of community detection methods in multilayer networks.Data Mining and Knowledge Dis- covery, 35:1–45, 2021

    Xinyu Huang, Dongming Chen, Tao Ren, and Dongqi Wang. A survey of community detection methods in multilayer networks.Data Mining and Knowledge Dis- covery, 35:1–45, 2021

    work page 2021

  57. [57]

    Finding and characterizing communities in mul- tidimensional networks

    Michele Berlingerio, Michele Coscia, and Fosca Gian- notti. Finding and characterizing communities in mul- tidimensional networks. In2011 international confer- ence on advances in social networks analysis and min- ing, pages 490–494. IEEE, 2011

    work page 2011

  58. [58]

    Differential flattening: A novel framework for community detection in multi-layer graphs.ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST), 8(2):1–23, 2016

    Jungeun Kim, Jae-Gil Lee, and Sungsu Lim. Differential flattening: A novel framework for community detection in multi-layer graphs.ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST), 8(2):1–23, 2016

    work page 2016

  59. [59]

    Coherent closed quasi-clique discovery from large dense graph databases

    Zhiping Zeng, Jianyong Wang, Lizhu Zhou, and George Karypis. Coherent closed quasi-clique discovery from large dense graph databases. InProceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 797–802, 2006

    work page 2006

  60. [60]

    Abacus: frequent pattern mining-based com- munity discovery in multidimensional networks.Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 27:294–320, 2013

    Michele Berlingerio, Fabio Pinelli, and Francesco Cal- abrese. Abacus: frequent pattern mining-based com- munity discovery in multidimensional networks.Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 27:294–320, 2013

    work page 2013

  61. [61]

    Clustering on multi-layer graphs via subspace analysis on grassmann manifolds.IEEE Transactions on signal processing, 62(4):905–918, 2013

    Xiaowen Dong, Pascal Frossard, Pierre Vandergheynst, and Nikolai Nefedov. Clustering on multi-layer graphs via subspace analysis on grassmann manifolds.IEEE Transactions on signal processing, 62(4):905–918, 2013

    work page 2013

  62. [62]

    Multiview clus- tering via adaptively weighted procrustes

    Feiping Nie, Lai Tian, and Xuelong Li. Multiview clus- tering via adaptively weighted procrustes. InProceed- ings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD international confer- ence on knowledge discovery & data mining, pages 2022– 2030, 2018

    work page 2022

  63. [64]

    Ensemble-based community detection in multilayer net- works.Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 31:1506– 1543, 2017

    Andrea Tagarelli, Alessia Amelio, and Francesco Gullo. Ensemble-based community detection in multilayer net- works.Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 31:1506– 1543, 2017

    work page 2017

  64. [65]

    Cluster analysis of multivariate data: efficiency versus interpretability of classifications.Bio- metrics, 21:768–769, 1965

    Edward W Forgy. Cluster analysis of multivariate data: efficiency versus interpretability of classifications.Bio- metrics, 21:768–769, 1965

    work page 1965

  65. [66]

    J. B. MacQueen. Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. In L. M. Le Cam and J. Neyman, editors,Proc. of the fifth Berkeley Sym- posium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, vol- ume 1, pages 281–297, Berkeley, USA, 1967. University of California Press

    work page 1967

  66. [67]

    Cluster ensem- bles — a knowledge reuse framework for combining mul- tiple partitions.J

    Alexander Strehl and Joydeep Ghosh. Cluster ensem- bles — a knowledge reuse framework for combining mul- tiple partitions.J. Mach. Learn. Res., 3:583–617, March 2002

    work page 2002

  67. [68]

    Community structure in time-dependent, multiscale, and multiplex networks.science, 328(5980):876–878, 2010

    Peter J Mucha, Thomas Richardson, Kevin Macon, Ma- son A Porter, and Jukka-Pekka Onnela. Community structure in time-dependent, multiscale, and multiplex networks.science, 328(5980):876–878, 2010

    work page 2010

  68. [69]

    Local commu- nity detection in multilayer networks.Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 31:1444–1479, 2017

    Roberto Interdonato, Andrea Tagarelli, Dino Ienco, Ar- naud Sallaberry, and Pascal Poncelet. Local commu- nity detection in multilayer networks.Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 31:1444–1479, 2017

    work page 2017

  69. [70]

    Mining community structures in multidimensional networks

    Oualid Boutemine and Mohamed Bouguessa. Mining community structures in multidimensional networks. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data (TKDD), 11(4):1–36, 2017

    work page 2017

  70. [71]

    Partial and overlapping community detection in mul- tiplex social networks

    Nazanin Afsarmanesh Tehrani and Matteo Magnani. Partial and overlapping community detection in mul- tiplex social networks. InInternational conference on social informatics, pages 15–28. Springer, 2018

    work page 2018

  71. [72]

    Identifying modular flows on multilayer networks reveals highly overlapping organi- zation in interconnected systems.Physical Review X, 5(1):011027, 2015

    Manlio De Domenico, Andrea Lancichinetti, Alex Are- nas, and Martin Rosvall. Identifying modular flows on multilayer networks reveals highly overlapping organi- zation in interconnected systems.Physical Review X, 5(1):011027, 2015

    work page 2015

  72. [73]

    Community detection in multiplex networks using locally adaptive random walks

    Zhana Kuncheva and Giovanni Montana. Community detection in multiplex networks using locally adaptive random walks. InProceedings of the 2015 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Net- works Analysis and Mining 2015, pages 1308–1315, 2015

    work page 2015

  73. [74]

    Inferring the mesoscale structure of layered, edge-valued, and time-varying networks.Phys- ical Review E, 92(4):042807, 2015

    Tiago P Peixoto. Inferring the mesoscale structure of layered, edge-valued, and time-varying networks.Phys- ical Review E, 92(4):042807, 2015

    work page 2015

  74. [75]

    Community detection, link prediction, and layer interdependence in multilayer 24 networks.Physical Review E, 95(4):042317, 2017

    Caterina De Bacco, Eleanor A Power, Daniel B Lar- remore, and Cristopher Moore. Community detection, link prediction, and layer interdependence in multilayer 24 networks.Physical Review E, 95(4):042317, 2017

    work page 2017

  75. [76]

    Community detection in networks: Structural com- munities versus ground truth.Physical Review E, 90(6):062805, 2014

    Darko Hric, Richard K Darst, and Santo Fortunato. Community detection in networks: Structural com- munities versus ground truth.Physical Review E, 90(6):062805, 2014

    work page 2014

  76. [77]

    The ground truth about metadata and community detection in networks.Science advances, 3(5):e1602548, 2017

    Leto Peel, Daniel B Larremore, and Aaron Clauset. The ground truth about metadata and community detection in networks.Science advances, 3(5):e1602548, 2017

    work page 2017

  77. [78]

    Net- work structure, metadata, and the prediction of missing nodes and annotations.Physical Review X, 6(3):031038, 2016

    Darko Hric, Tiago P Peixoto, and Santo Fortunato. Net- work structure, metadata, and the prediction of missing nodes and annotations.Physical Review X, 6(3):031038, 2016

    work page 2016

  78. [79]

    Structure and infer- ence in annotated networks.Nat

    MEJ Newman and Aaron Clauset. Structure and infer- ence in annotated networks.Nat. Commun., 7:11863, 2016

    work page 2016

  79. [80]

    Mining heterogeneous information networks: a structural analysis approach

    Yizhou Sun and Jiawei Han. Mining heterogeneous information networks: a structural analysis approach. ACM SIGKDD explorations newsletter, 14(2):20–28, 2013

    work page 2013

  80. [81]

    Network diffusion frame- work to simulate spreading processes in complex net- works.Big Data Mining And Analytics, 7(3):637–654, 2024

    Micha l Czuba, Mateusz Nurek, Damian Serwata, Yu- Xuan Qi, Mingshan Jia, Katarzyna Musial, Rados law Michalski, and Piotr Br´ odka. Network diffusion frame- work to simulate spreading processes in complex net- works.Big Data Mining And Analytics, 7(3):637–654, 2024

    work page 2024

Showing first 80 references.