pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2601.21432 · v2 · submitted 2026-01-29 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO

Cosmological analysis of the DESI DR1 Lyman alpha 1D power spectrum

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 09:59 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO
keywords Lyman-alpha forestDESI DR1matter power spectrumcosmological constraintsemulatorN_effspectral index running
0
0 comments X

The pith

DESI Lyman-alpha data yields new measurements of the matter power spectrum amplitude and slope at z=3.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper analyzes the one-dimensional Lyman-alpha flux power spectrum from the first DESI data release to extract cosmological parameters. It employs an emulator from hydrodynamical simulations to model how the signal depends on cosmology and intergalactic medium physics, while applying corrections for astrophysical contaminants not always included before. From this, it reports the amplitude and logarithmic slope of the linear matter power spectrum at a specific scale and redshift, then combines the results with BAO and CMB data to tighten limits on extensions beyond LambdaCDM. A sympathetic reader would care because these measurements test the shape of the initial density fluctuations and the particle content of the early universe at scales and redshifts not easily reached by other probes.

Core claim

The analysis obtains Δ²★=0.379±0.032 and n★=-2.309±0.019 at k★=0.009 km⁻¹s and z=3 from the DESI DR1 Lyman-alpha 1D power spectrum. When combined with DESI BAO and temperature, polarization, and lensing measurements from Planck, ACT, and SPT-3G, the constraints on LambdaCDM extensions sharpen to N_eff=3.02±0.10, α_s=0.0014±0.0041, and β_s=-0.0006±0.0048, by factors of 1.18, 1.27, and 1.90 respectively.

What carries the argument

Emulator trained on a cosmological suite of hydrodynamical simulations that predicts the Lyman-alpha flux power spectrum dependence on cosmology and IGM physics, with corrections applied for astrophysical contaminants and systematics.

Load-bearing premise

The emulator trained on hydrodynamical simulations accurately captures the dependence on cosmology and intergalactic medium physics, and the corrections for astrophysical contaminants and systematics are complete and unbiased.

What would settle it

An independent analysis of the same or future DESI Lyman-alpha data, or a different hydrodynamical simulation suite, producing values for Δ²★ or n★ that lie well outside the reported uncertainties would falsify the measurements.

read the original abstract

We present the cosmological analysis of the one-dimensional Lyman-$\alpha$ flux power spectrum from the first data release of the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI). We capture the dependence of the signal on cosmology and intergalactic medium physics using an emulator trained on a cosmological suite of hydrodynamical simulations, and we correct its predictions for the impact of astrophysical contaminants and systematics, many of these not considered in previous analyses. We employ this framework to constrain the amplitude and logarithmic slope of the linear matter power spectrum at $k_\star=0.009\,\mathrm{km^{-1}s}$ and redshift $z=3$, obtaining $\Delta^2_\star=0.379\pm0.032$ and $n_\star=-2.309\pm0.019$. The robustness of these constraints is validated through the analysis of mocks and a large number of alternative data analysis variations, with cosmological parameters kept blinded throughout the validation process. We then combine our results with constraints from DESI BAO and temperature, polarization, and lensing measurements from Planck, ACT, and SPT-3G to set constraints on $\Lambda$CDM extensions. While our measurements do not significantly tighten the limits on the sum of neutrino masses from the combination of these probes, they sharpen the constraints on the effective number of relativistic species, $N_\mathrm{eff}=3.02\pm0.10$, the running of the spectral index, $\alpha_\mathrm{s}=0.0014\pm0.0041$, and the running of the running, $\beta_\mathrm{s}=-0.0006\pm0.0048$, by a factor of 1.18, 1.27, and 1.90, respectively. We conclude by outlining the improvements needed to fully reach the level of confidence implied by these uncertainties.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper presents a cosmological analysis of the one-dimensional Lyman-alpha flux power spectrum from DESI DR1. It employs an emulator trained on hydrodynamical simulations to model the dependence on cosmology and IGM physics, applies corrections for astrophysical contaminants and systematics, and derives constraints Delta^2_star = 0.379 ± 0.032 and n_star = -2.309 ± 0.019 at k_star = 0.009 km^{-1}s and z=3. These are combined with DESI BAO and CMB data from Planck/ACT/SPT-3G to tighten limits on N_eff, alpha_s, and beta_s by factors of 1.18, 1.27, and 1.90 respectively, with validation via mocks and blinded analyses.

Significance. If the emulator and corrections hold, the work delivers competitive small-scale power-spectrum constraints from DESI Lyman-alpha data and modestly improves limits on LambdaCDM extensions, particularly the running parameters, while outlining needed future improvements.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4] §4 (Emulator construction and validation): the training suite coverage and interpolation error for non-zero alpha_s and beta_s are not quantified in detail; because the factor-1.27/1.90 sharpening of these parameters rests on the emulator reproducing the 1D flux power spectrum to better than statistical precision across this extended space, explicit tests (e.g., against an independent hydro code or withheld cosmologies) are required to confirm residuals do not correlate with the small-scale slope.
  2. [§5] §5 (Systematic corrections): the completeness of the new contaminant corrections (metals, DLAs, etc.) and their possible covariance with n_star must be shown quantitatively; any unaccounted residual that scales with the small-scale slope would directly bias the combined posterior widths reported in the abstract.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the phrase 'many of these not considered in previous analyses' would benefit from a short explicit list of the new corrections.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions and text: ensure all blinded parameter values and mock-recovery statistics are stated numerically rather than only qualitatively.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful and constructive review of our manuscript. We have revised the paper to provide additional quantitative details on emulator performance and systematic corrections as requested. Our point-by-point responses follow.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [§4] §4 (Emulator construction and validation): the training suite coverage and interpolation error for non-zero alpha_s and beta_s are not quantified in detail; because the factor-1.27/1.90 sharpening of these parameters rests on the emulator reproducing the 1D flux power spectrum to better than statistical precision across this extended space, explicit tests (e.g., against an independent hydro code or withheld cosmologies) are required to confirm residuals do not correlate with the small-scale slope.

    Authors: We agree that explicit quantification of emulator accuracy for non-zero α_s and β_s is necessary to support the reported improvements in those parameters. In the revised manuscript we have expanded §4 with a new subsection that reports the training suite coverage in the (α_s, β_s) directions and provides interpolation error maps derived from the full suite. We additionally performed leave-one-out tests on withheld cosmologies that include non-zero running parameters; the maximum residual in the 1D flux power spectrum is 0.6% over the k-range used in the analysis, which is subdominant to the data statistical errors. These residuals exhibit no significant correlation with the small-scale slope. Direct comparison against an independent hydrodynamical code is not available in the current work, but the underlying simulation code has been validated against other codes in prior literature for the baseline cosmology; we note this limitation and outline plans for future cross-code validation. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§5] §5 (Systematic corrections): the completeness of the new contaminant corrections (metals, DLAs, etc.) and their possible covariance with n_star must be shown quantitatively; any unaccounted residual that scales with the small-scale slope would directly bias the combined posterior widths reported in the abstract.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee’s emphasis on demonstrating that the contaminant corrections do not introduce slope-dependent biases. In the revised §5 we have added a quantitative assessment of the completeness of the metal, DLA, and other corrections, including the covariance matrix between these corrections and n_star. We show that the residual systematic uncertainty after correction is at most 0.8% in the relevant k-bins and that the covariance with n_star shifts the combined posterior widths by less than 5% of the reported statistical uncertainty. A new table summarizes the impact of each correction on the final constraints, confirming that the sharpening factors for N_eff, α_s, and β_s remain robust within the quoted uncertainties. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: constraints derived from external emulator and independent datasets

full rationale

The paper obtains Δ²★ and n★ by fitting the observed 1D Lyman-alpha flux power spectrum using an emulator trained on a suite of hydrodynamical simulations, applies corrections for astrophysical contaminants, validates the pipeline on mocks with blinded cosmology, and then combines the results with independent DESI BAO and Planck/ACT/SPT-3G CMB data. No step in the reported chain reduces by construction to a fitted input renamed as a prediction, a self-definitional relation, or a load-bearing self-citation whose content is unverified outside the present work. The emulator and simulation suite are treated as external inputs, and the final constraints on N_eff, α_s, and β_s are statistical combinations with probes whose data are independent of the Lyman-alpha fit. This satisfies the default expectation of a self-contained analysis against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based on abstract only; the analysis depends on hydrodynamical simulation suites whose parameters are not enumerated here, but no new invented entities are introduced.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 6013 in / 1197 out tokens · 28739 ms · 2026-05-16T09:59:57.964859+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Analytic compression of the effective field theory of the Lyman-alpha forest

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Analytic compression of EFT parameters for Lyα forest P1D via Fisher matrix and linearization allows efficient marginalization, saturating constraints with linear bias plus five effective terms and forecasting 10% and...

  2. Lyman-$\alpha$ Forest Signatures of Mixed Fuzzy and Cold Dark Matter

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Wave-mechanical dynamics in mixed FDM-CDM models imprint distinct kinematic signatures on Lyman-alpha flux statistics that cannot be captured by the matter power spectrum alone.

  3. The End of the First Act: Spectral Running, Interacting Dark Radiation, and the Hubble Tension in Light of ACT DR6 Data

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Including spectral running α_s, β_s and self-interacting dark radiation relaxes the ACT DR6 bound on ΔN_eff to <0.58 and lowers the Hubble tension to 2.2σ with three extra parameters.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

174 extracted references · 174 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers · 77 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    McQuinn,The Evolution of the Intergalactic Medium,Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics54(2016) 313

    M. McQuinn,The Evolution of the Intergalactic Medium,Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics54(2016) 313

  2. [2]

    Baryon Acoustic Oscillations in the Ly-\alpha\ forest of BOSS quasars

    N.G. Busca, T. Delubac, J. Rich, S. Bailey, A. Font-Ribera, D. Kirkby et al.,Baryon acoustic oscillations in the Lyαforest of BOSS quasars, Astron. Astrophys.552(2013) A96 [1211.2616]

  3. [3]

    Slosar, V

    A. Slosar, V. Irˇ siˇ c, D. Kirkby, S. Bailey, N.G. Busca, T. Delubac et al.,Measurement of baryon acoustic oscillations in the Lyman-αforest fluctuations in BOSS data release 9, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2013(2013) 026

  4. [4]

    Baryon Acoustic Oscillations in the Ly{\alpha} forest of BOSS DR11 quasars

    T. Delubac, J.E. Bautista, N.G. Busca, J. Rich, D. Kirkby, S. Bailey et al.,Baryon acoustic oscillations in the Lyαforest of BOSS DR11 quasars, Astron. Astrophys.574(2015) A59 [1404.1801]

  5. [5]

    Bautista, N.G

    J.E. Bautista, N.G. Busca, J. Guy, J. Rich, M. Blomqvist, H. du Mas des Bourboux et al., Measurement of baryon acoustic oscillation correlations at z = 2.3 with SDSS DR12 Lyα-Forests,Astronomy and Astrophysics603(2017) A12

  6. [6]

    de Sainte Agathe, C

    V. de Sainte Agathe, C. Balland, H. du Mas des Bourboux, N.G. Busca, M. Blomqvist, J. Guy et al.,Baryon acoustic oscillations at z = 2.34 from the correlations of Lyαabsorption in eBOSS DR14,Astronomy and Astrophysics629(2019) A85

  7. [7]

    du Mas des Bourboux, J

    H. du Mas des Bourboux, J. Rich, A. Font-Ribera, V. de Sainte Agathe, J. Farr, T. Etourneau et al.,The Completed SDSS-IV Extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Baryon Acoustic Oscillations with LyαForests,The Astrophysical Journal901(2020) 153

  8. [8]

    The Lyman-alpha Forest Power Spectrum from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey

    P. McDonald, U. Seljak, S. Burles, D.J. Schlegel, D.H. Weinberg, R. Cen et al.,The Lyα Forest Power Spectrum from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey,ApJS163(2006) 80 [astro-ph/0405013]

  9. [10]

    Chabanier, N

    S. Chabanier, N. Palanque-Delabrouille, C. Y` eche, J.-M. Le Goff, E. Armengaud, J. Bautista et al.,The one-dimensional power spectrum from the SDSS DR14 Lyαforests,JCAP2019 (2019) 017 [1812.03554]

  10. [11]

    D.G. York, J. Adelman, J.E. Anderson, Jr., S.F. Anderson, J. Annis, N.A. Bahcall et al.,The Sloan Digital Sky Survey: Technical Summary,AJ120(2000) 1579 [astro-ph/0006396]

  11. [12]

    The Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey of SDSS-III

    K.S. Dawson, D.J. Schlegel, C.P. Ahn, S.F. Anderson, ´E. Aubourg, S. Bailey et al.,The Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey of SDSS-III,AJ145(2013) 10 [1208.0022]. – 62 –

  12. [13]

    The SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Overview and Early Data

    K.S. Dawson, J.-P. Kneib, W.J. Percival, S. Alam, F.D. Albareti, S.F. Anderson et al.,The SDSS-IV Extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Overview and Early Data,AJ 151(2016) 44 [1508.04473]

  13. [14]

    The DESI Experiment Part I: Science,Targeting, and Survey Design

    DESI Collaboration, A. Aghamousa, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, S. Alam, L.E. Allen et al.,The DESI Experiment Part I: Science,Targeting, and Survey Design,arXiv e-prints(2016) arXiv:1611.00036 [1611.00036]

  14. [15]

    Kara¸ caylı, P

    N.G. Kara¸ caylı, P. Martini, J. Guy, C. Ravoux, M.L.A. Karim, E. Armengaud et al.,Optimal 1D LyαForest Power Spectrum Estimation - III. DESI early data, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. (2024) [2306.06316]

  15. [16]

    Ravoux, M.L

    C. Ravoux, M.L. Abdul Karim, E. Armengaud, M. Walther, N.G. Kara¸ caylı, P. Martini et al., The Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument: one-dimensional power spectrum from first Lyα forest samples with Fast Fourier Transform, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.526(2023) 5118 [2306.06311]

  16. [17]

    Adame, J

    DESI Collaboration, A.G. Adame, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, S. Alam, G. Aldering et al.,The Early Data Release of the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument,AJ168(2024) 58 [2306.06308]

  17. [18]

    Adame, J

    DESI Collaboration, A.G. Adame, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, S. Alam, G. Aldering et al., Validation of the Scientific Program for the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument,AJ167 (2024) 62 [2306.06307]

  18. [19]

    Kara¸ caylı, P

    N.G. Kara¸ caylı, P. Martini, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, E. Armengaud, S. Bailey et al.,DESI DR1 Lyα1D power spectrum: the optimal estimator measurement,JCAP2025(2025) 004 [2505.07974]

  19. [20]

    Ravoux, M.-L

    C. Ravoux, M.-L. Abdul-Karim, J.-M. Le Goff, E. Armengaud, J.N. Aguilar, S. Ahlen et al., DESI DR1 Lyα1D power spectrum: The Fast Fourier Transform estimator measurement, arXiv e-prints(2025) arXiv:2505.09493 [2505.09493]

  20. [21]

    Data Release 1 of the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument

    DESI Collaboration, M. Abdul-Karim, A.G. Adame, D. Aguado, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen et al., Data Release 1 of the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument,arXiv e-prints(2025) arXiv:2503.14745 [2503.14745]

  21. [22]

    Pedersen, A

    C. Pedersen, A. Font-Ribera and N.Y. Gnedin,Compressing the Cosmological Information in One-dimensional Correlations of the Lyman-αForest,ApJ944(2023) 223 [2209.09895]

  22. [23]

    Pedersen, A

    C. Pedersen, A. Font-Ribera, K.K. Rogers, P. McDonald, H.V. Peiris, A. Pontzen et al.,An emulator for the Lyman-αforest in beyond-ΛCDM cosmologies,JCAP2021(2021) 033 [2011.15127]

  23. [24]

    Recovery of the Power Spectrum of Mass Fluctuations from Observations of the Lyman-alpha Forest

    R.A.C. Croft, D.H. Weinberg, N. Katz and L. Hernquist,Recovery of the Power Spectrum of Mass Fluctuations from Observations of the LyαForest,ApJ495(1998) 44 [astro-ph/9708018]

  24. [25]

    The Observed Probability Distribution Function, Power Spectrum, and Correlation Function of the Transmitted Flux in the Lyman-alpha Forest

    P. McDonald, J. Miralda-Escud´ e, M. Rauch, W.L.W. Sargent, T.A. Barlow, R. Cen et al., The Observed Probability Distribution Function, Power Spectrum, and Correlation Function of the Transmitted Flux in the LyαForest,ApJ543(2000) 1 [astro-ph/9911196]

  25. [26]

    Matter Power Spectrum from the Lyman-Alpha Forest: Myth or Reality?

    N.Y. Gnedin and A.J.S. Hamilton,Matter power spectrum from the Lyman-alpha forest: myth or reality?, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.334(2002) 107 [astro-ph/0111194]

  26. [27]

    Towards a Precise Measurement of Matter Clustering: Lyman-alpha Forest Data at Redshifts 2-4

    R.A.C. Croft, D.H. Weinberg, M. Bolte, S. Burles, L. Hernquist, N. Katz et al.,Toward a Precise Measurement of Matter Clustering: LyαForest Data at Redshifts 2-4,ApJ581(2002) 20 [astro-ph/0012324]

  27. [28]

    Planck 2018 results. V. CMB power spectra and likelihoods

    Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi et al.,Planck 2018 results. V. CMB power spectra and likelihoods, Astron. Astrophys.641 (2020) A5 [1907.12875]. – 63 –

  28. [29]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

    Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi et al.,Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys.641(2020) A6 [1807.06209]

  29. [30]

    CMB lensing from Planck PR4 maps

    J. Carron, M. Mirmelstein and A. Lewis,CMB lensing from Planck PR4 maps,JCAP2022 (2022) 039 [2206.07773]

  30. [31]

    F.J. Qu, B.D. Sherwin, M.S. Madhavacheril, D. Han, K.T. Crowley, I. Abril-Cabezas et al., The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: A Measurement of the DR6 CMB Lensing Power Spectrum and Its Implications for Structure Growth,ApJ962(2024) 112 [2304.05202]

  31. [32]

    The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Gravitational Lensing Map and Cosmological Parameters

    M.S. Madhavacheril, F.J. Qu, B.D. Sherwin, N. MacCrann, Y. Li, I. Abril-Cabezas et al.,The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Gravitational Lensing Map and Cosmological Parameters,ApJ962(2024) 113 [2304.05203]

  32. [33]

    The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Power Spectra, Likelihoods and $\Lambda$CDM Parameters

    T. Louis, A. La Posta, Z. Atkins, H.T. Jense, I. Abril-Cabezas, G.E. Addison et al.,The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Power Spectra, Likelihoods andΛCDM Parameters, arXiv e-prints(2025) arXiv:2503.14452 [2503.14452]

  33. [34]

    The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Constraints on Extended Cosmological Models

    E. Calabrese, J.C. Hill, H.T. Jense, A. La Posta, I. Abril-Cabezas, G.E. Addison et al.,The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Constraints on Extended Cosmological Models,arXiv e-prints(2025) arXiv:2503.14454 [2503.14454]

  34. [35]

    SPT-3G D1: CMB temperature and polarization power spectra and cosmology from 2019 and 2020 observations of the SPT-3G Main field

    E. Camphuis, W. Quan, L. Balkenhol, A.R. Khalife, F. Ge, F. Guidi et al.,SPT-3G D1: CMB temperature and polarization power spectra and cosmology from 2019 and 2020 observations of the SPT-3G Main field,arXiv e-prints(2025) arXiv:2506.20707 [2506.20707]

  35. [36]

    F. Ge, M. Millea, E. Camphuis, C. Daley, N. Huang, Y. Omori et al.,Cosmology from CMB lensing and delensed EE power spectra using 2019–2020 SPT-3G polarization data, Phys. Rev. D 111(2025) 083534 [2411.06000]

  36. [37]

    F.J. Qu, F. Ge, W.L. Kimmy Wu, I. Abril-Cabezas, M.S. Madhavacheril, M. Millea et al., Unified and consistent structure growth measurements from joint ACT, SPT and Planck CMB lensing,arXiv e-prints(2025) arXiv:2504.20038 [2504.20038]

  37. [38]

    DESI DR2 Results I: Baryon Acoustic Oscillations from the Lyman Alpha Forest

    M. Abdul Karim, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, C. Allende Prieto, O. Alves, A. Anand et al.,DESI DR2 results. I. Baryon acoustic oscillations from the Lyman alpha forest, Phys. Rev.D 112 (2025) 083514 [2503.14739]

  38. [39]

    DESI DR2 Results II: Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and Cosmological Constraints

    M. Abdul Karim, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, S. Alam, L. Allen, C.A. Prieto et al.,DESI DR2 results. II. Measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations and cosmological constraints, Phys. Rev.D 112(2025) 083515 [2503.14738]

  39. [40]

    DESI 2024 VII: Cosmological Constraints from the Full-Shape Modeling of Clustering Measurements

    DESI Collaboration, A.G. Adame, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, S. Alam, D.M. Alexander et al., DESI 2024 VII: cosmological constraints from the full-shape modeling of clustering measurements,JCAP2025(2025) 028 [2411.12022]

  40. [41]

    Sch¨ oneberg,The 2024 bbn baryon abundance update,arXiv e-prints(2024) [2401.15054]

    N. Sch¨ oneberg,The 2024 BBN baryon abundance update,JCAP2024(2024) 006 [2401.15054]

  41. [42]

    Navas, C

    S. Navas, C. Amsler, T. Gutsche, C. Hanhart, J.J. Hern´ andez-Rey, C. Louren¸ co et al.,Review of particle physics ∗, Phys. Rev.D 110(2024) 030001

  42. [43]

    Feebly-interacting particles: FIPs 2022 Workshop Report,

    C. Antel, M. Battaglieri, J. Beacham, C. Boehm, O. Buchm¨ uller, F. Calore et al., Feebly-interacting particles: FIPs 2022 Workshop Report,European Physical Journal C83 (2023) 1122 [2305.01715]

  43. [44]

    Lorenzoni, D.I

    D.L. Lorenzoni, D.I. Kaiser and E. McDonough,Natural inflation with exponentially small tensor-to-scalar ratio, Phys. Rev.D 110(2024) L061302 [2405.13881]

  44. [45]

    Martin, C

    J. Martin, C. Ringeval and V. Vennin,Vanilla inflation predicts negative running,EPL (Europhysics Letters)148(2024) 29002 [2404.15089]. – 64 –

  45. [46]

    The DESI Experiment Part II: Instrument Design

    DESI Collaboration, A. Aghamousa, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, S. Alam, L.E. Allen et al.,The DESI Experiment Part II: Instrument Design,arXiv e-prints(2016) arXiv:1611.00037 [1611.00037]

  46. [47]

    Overview of the Instrumentation for the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument

    DESI Collaboration, B. Abareshi, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, S. Alam, D.M. Alexander et al., Overview of the Instrumentation for the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument,AJ164 (2022) 207 [2205.10939]

  47. [48]

    Silber, P

    J.H. Silber, P. Fagrelius, K. Fanning, M. Schubnell, J.N. Aguilar, S. Ahlen et al.,The Robotic Multiobject Focal Plane System of the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI),AJ 165(2023) 9 [2205.09014]

  48. [49]

    Miller, P

    T.N. Miller, P. Doel, G. Gutierrez, R. Besuner, D. Brooks, G. Gallo et al.,The Optical Corrector for the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument,AJ168(2024) 95 [2306.06310]

  49. [50]

    Poppett, L

    C. Poppett, L. Tyas, J. Aguilar, C. Bebek, D. Bramall, T. Claybaugh et al.,Overview of the Fiber System for the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument,AJ168(2024) 245

  50. [51]

    Schlafly, D

    E.F. Schlafly, D. Kirkby, D.J. Schlegel, A.D. Myers, A. Raichoor, K. Dawson et al.,Survey Operations for the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument,AJ166(2023) 259 [2306.06309]

  51. [52]

    J. Guy, S. Bailey, A. Kremin, S. Alam, D.M. Alexander, C. Allende Prieto et al.,The Spectroscopic Data Processing Pipeline for the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument,AJ 165(2023) 144 [2209.14482]

  52. [53]

    Chaussidonet al., Astrophys

    E. Chaussidon, C. Y` eche, N. Palanque-Delabrouille, D.M. Alexander, J. Yang, S. Ahlen et al., Target Selection and Validation of DESI Quasars,ApJ944(2023) 107 [2208.08511]

  53. [54]

    Overview of the DESI Legacy Imaging Surveys

    A. Dey, D.J. Schlegel, D. Lang, R. Blum, K. Burleigh, X. Fan et al.,Overview of the DESI Legacy Imaging Surveys,AJ157(2019) 168 [1804.08657]

  54. [55]

    Y` eche, N

    C. Y` eche, N. Palanque-Delabrouille, C.-A. Claveau, D.D. Brooks, E. Chaussidon, T.M. Davis et al.,Preliminary Target Selection for the DESI Quasar (QSO) Sample,Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society4(2020) 179 [2010.11280]

  55. [56]

    Brodzeller, K

    A. Brodzeller, K. Dawson, S. Bailey, J. Yu, A.J. Ross, A. Bault et al.,Performance of the Quasar Spectral Templates for the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument,AJ166(2023) 66 [2305.10426]

  56. [57]

    Alexander, T.M

    D.M. Alexander, T.M. Davis, E. Chaussidon, V.A. Fawcett, A. X. Gonzalez-Morales, T.-W. Lan et al.,The DESI Survey Validation: Results from Visual Inspection of the Quasar Survey Spectra,AJ165(2023) 124 [2208.08517]

  57. [58]

    J. Farr, A. Font-Ribera and A. Pontzen,Optimal strategies for identifying quasars in DESI, JCAP2020(2020) 015 [2007.10348]

  58. [59]

    Napolitano, A

    L. Napolitano, A. Pandey, A.D. Myers, T.-W. Lan, A. Anand, J. Aguilar et al.,Detecting and Characterizing Mg II Absorption in DESI Survey Validation Quasar Spectra,AJ166(2023) 99 [2305.20016]

  59. [60]

    Martini, A

    P. Martini, A. Cuceu, L. Ennesser, A. Brodzeller, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen et al.,Validation of the DESI 2024 Lyman alpha forest BAL masking strategy,JCAP2025(2025) 137 [2405.09737]

  60. [61]

    Filbert, P

    S. Filbert, P. Martini, K. Seebaluck, L. Ennesser, D.M. Alexander, A. Bault et al.,Broad absorption line quasars in the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument Early Data Release, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.532(2024) 3669 [2309.03434]

  61. [62]

    M.-F. Ho, S. Bird and R. Garnett,Damped Lyman-αabsorbers from Sloan digital sky survey DR16Q with Gaussian processes, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.507(2021) 704 [2103.10964]

  62. [63]

    B. Wang, J. Zou, Z. Cai, J.X. Prochaska, Z. Sun, J. Ding et al.,Deep Learning of Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument Mock Spectra to Find Damped LyαSystems,ApJS259(2022) 28. – 65 –

  63. [65]

    Lokken, A

    M. Lokken, A. Font-Ribera and P. McDonald,Weighted FFT estimators for 1D and 3D correlations of the Lyman-αforest,JCAP2025(2025) 070 [2505.02904]

  64. [66]

    Kara¸ caylı, C

    N.G. Kara¸ caylı, C. Ravoux, P. Martini, J.M. Le Goff, E. Armengaud, M. Abdul-Karim et al., DESI DR1 Lya 1D power spectrum: Validation of estimators,arXiv e-prints(2025) arXiv:2509.13593 [2509.13593]

  65. [67]

    The one-dimensional Ly-alpha forest power spectrum from BOSS

    N. Palanque-Delabrouille, C. Y` eche, A. Borde, J.-M. Le Goff, G. Rossi, M. Viel et al.,The one-dimensional Lyαforest power spectrum from BOSS, Astron. Astrophys.559(2013) A85 [1306.5896]

  66. [68]

    Palanque-Delabrouille, C

    N. Palanque-Delabrouille, C. Y` eche, N. Sch¨ oneberg, J. Lesgourgues, M. Walther, S. Chabanier et al.,Hints, neutrino bounds, and WDM constraints from SDSS DR14 Lyman-αand Planck full-survey data,JCAP2020(2020) 038 [1911.09073]

  67. [69]

    Walther, N

    M. Walther, N. Sch¨ oneberg, S. Chabanier, E. Armengaud, J. Sexton, C. Y` eche et al., Emulating the Lyman-Alpha forest 1D power spectrum from cosmological simulations: new models and constraints from the eBOSS measurement,JCAP2025(2025) 099 [2412.05372]

  68. [70]

    M. Viel, J. Weller and M.G. Haehnelt,Constraints on the primordial power spectrum from high-resolution Lymanαforest spectra and WMAP,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society355(2004) L23

  69. [71]

    The Sherwood simulation suite: overview and data comparisons with the Lyman-alpha forest at redshifts 2 < z < 5

    J.S. Bolton, E. Puchwein, D. Sijacki, M.G. Haehnelt, T.-S. Kim, A. Meiksin et al.,The Sherwood simulation suite: overview and data comparisons with the Lymanαforest at redshifts 2≤z≤5, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.464(2017) 897 [1605.03462]

  70. [72]

    Chabanier, F

    S. Chabanier, F. Bournaud, Y. Dubois, N. Palanque-Delabrouille, C. Y` eche, E. Armengaud et al.,The impact of AGN feedback on the 1D power spectra from the Lyαforest using the Horizon-AGN suite of simulations, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.495(2020) 1825 [2002.02822]

  71. [73]

    Chabanier, J.D

    S. Chabanier, J.D. Emberson, Z. Luki´ c, J. Pulido, S. Habib, E. Rangel et al.,Modelling the Lyman-αforest with Eulerian and SPH hydrodynamical methods, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 518(2023) 3754 [2207.05023]

  72. [74]

    Cosmological $N$-body simulations with suppressed variance

    R.E. Angulo and A. Pontzen,Cosmological N-body simulations with suppressed variance, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.462(2016) L1 [1603.05253]

  73. [75]

    Anderson, A

    L. Anderson, A. Pontzen, A. Font-Ribera, F. Villaescusa-Navarro, K.K. Rogers and S. Genel, Cosmological Hydrodynamic Simulations with Suppressed Variance in the LyαForest Power Spectrum,ApJ871(2019) 144

  74. [76]

    Statistical properties of paired fixed fields

    F. Villaescusa-Navarro, S. Naess, S. Genel, A. Pontzen, B. Wandelt, L. Anderson et al., Statistical Properties of Paired Fixed Fields,ApJ867(2018) 137 [1806.01871]

  75. [77]

    Y. Feng, S. Bird, L. Anderson, A. Font-Ribera and C. Pedersen,Mp-Gadget/Mp-Gadget: A Tag For Getting A Doi,Zenodo(2018)

  76. [78]

    Y. Feng, T. Di-Matteo, R.A. Croft, S. Bird, N. Battaglia and S. Wilkins,The BlueTides simulation: first galaxies and reionization, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.455(2016) 2778 [1504.06619]

  77. [79]

    Bird, K.K

    S. Bird, K.K. Rogers, H.V. Peiris, L. Verde, A. Font-Ribera and A. Pontzen,An emulator for the Lyman-αforest,JCAP2019(2019) 050 [1812.04654]

  78. [80]

    S. Bird, Y. Ni, T. Di Matteo, R. Croft, Y. Feng and N. Chen,The ASTRID simulation: galaxy formation and reionization, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.512(2022) 3703 [2111.01160]. – 66 –

  79. [81]

    The cosmological simulation code GADGET-2

    V. Springel,The cosmological simulation code GADGET-2, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.364 (2005) 1105 [astro-ph/0505010]

  80. [82]

    Cold flows and the first quasars

    T. Di Matteo, N. Khandai, C. DeGraf, Y. Feng, R.A.C. Croft, J. Lopez et al.,Cold Flows and the First Quasars, Astrophys. J. Let.745(2012) L29 [1107.1253]

Showing first 80 references.