pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.09097 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-10 · ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas · cond-mat.mes-hall· physics.optics

Ultrafast All-Optical Switching via a Supersolid Phase Transition of Light

J. L. Figueiredo , J. T. Mendon\c{c}a , H. Ter\c{c}as This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 17:06 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas cond-mat.mes-hallphysics.optics
keywords all-optical switchingsupersolidphoton superfluidroton instabilitybistable memorymicrocavitytwo-dimensional electron gasdriven-dissipative system
0
0 comments X

The pith

A supersolid phase transition in a driven photon fluid creates bistable all-optical switching and persistent memory with 120 dB contrast.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes that a phase transition from a uniform photon superfluid to a spatially ordered supersolid can be used to build an all-optical switch and memory element. By placing a high-mobility two-dimensional electron gas inside the microcavity and driving a current through it, the authors create a tunable nonlocal interaction among the photons. This interaction develops a negative dip at finite wavevectors, which triggers a roton instability and spontaneous ordering of the photon field. The resulting bistable response allows short optical pulses to toggle the system between states, with the ordered state remaining stable under a weaker continuous drive after the pulse ends. This setup is claimed to work in the ultrafast, low-energy regime and to outperform many existing optical switching approaches in contrast and reconfigurability.

Core claim

The authors show that a driven-dissipative microcavity containing a drifted 2DEG supports bistability between a uniform photon superfluid and a supersolid phase. The drift current displaces the Fermi disk, imparting a negative region to the Lindhard interaction kernel at finite wavevectors and thereby triggering a roton instability. This produces an S-shaped curve in transmitted intensity versus drive strength. Short optical pulses can therefore write or erase the supersolid state while a constant sub-threshold drive holds the hysteretic ON state, realizing an all-optical bistable memory with a switching contrast of order 120 dB. Stacking multiple quantum wells with different drift angles is

What carries the argument

the bistable S-curve that arises when a roton instability in the Lindhard kernel of the photon-photon interaction, engineered by a drifted 2DEG, drives a spontaneous transition to a supersolid photon phase.

If this is right

  • Short optical pulses toggle the photon field between uniform and supersolid configurations with a contrast of order 120 dB.
  • The ordered supersolid state persists under a constant sub-threshold drive after the write pulse is removed, functioning as all-optical memory.
  • Stacking layers of quantum wells with distinct drift angles allows engineering of higher-order spatial symmetries and nonbinary generalizations of the switch.
  • The device operates in the ultrafast, sub-fJ energy regime.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same instability mechanism could be used to create reconfigurable photonic lattices whose spatial order is controlled optically in real time.
  • Similar bistable supersolid behavior might appear in other driven-dissipative platforms such as exciton-polariton condensates if an analogous tunable interaction can be engineered.
  • Practical tests would need to confirm that the hysteretic state remains stable against cavity losses and thermal noise for times long enough to serve as memory.

Load-bearing premise

That driving a current through the embedded high-mobility 2DEG will reliably generate a negative region in the effective photon interaction at finite wavevectors that is strong enough to produce a stable supersolid phase.

What would settle it

Recording the transmitted intensity while slowly ramping the continuous-wave drive power up and down to test whether an S-shaped hysteresis loop with approximately 120 dB contrast appears, or imaging the cavity emission to check for the predicted periodic spatial density modulation once the supersolid branch is reached.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.09097 by H. Ter\c{c}as, J. L. Figueiredo, J. T. Mendon\c{c}a.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Interaction kernel and bistability. (a) Interaction er [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Switching dynamics. (a) Pump protocol [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Reconfigurable supersolid lattice. Top row: steady [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We propose ultrafast all-optical switching exploiting the bistability between a spatially uniform photon superfluid and a spontaneously ordered supersolid in a driven-dissipative microcavity. The key ingredient is a tunable nonlocal photon--photon interaction engineered by embedding a high-mobility two-dimensional electron gas (2DEG) inside the cavity. A drift current displaces the Fermi disk, imparting a negative region to the Lindhard interaction kernel at finite wavevectors and triggering a roton instability. The resulting bistable $S$-curve supports a write--hold--erase protocol in which short optical pulses toggle the system between branches with a switching contrast of order 120~dB. The hysteretic ON state persists under a constant sub-threshold drive after the write pulse is removed, realizing an all-optical bistable memory. Since the photon field couples additively to each embedded quantum well, stacking layers with distinct drift angles allows the roton profile to be engineered with higher-order symmetries, imprinting richer spatial order on the supersolid and enabling nonbinary generalizations of the switch. Operating in the ultrafast, sub-fJ regime, this platform outperforms most existing all-optical switches in contrast and reconfigurability.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes ultrafast all-optical switching by exploiting bistability between a spatially uniform photon superfluid and a spontaneously ordered supersolid phase in a driven-dissipative microcavity. A high-mobility 2DEG with applied drift current is used to engineer a tunable nonlocal photon-photon interaction via the Lindhard kernel, which is claimed to develop a negative region at finite wavevectors and trigger a roton instability. The resulting hysteretic S-curve is said to enable a write-hold-erase protocol with ~120 dB contrast, where short optical pulses toggle states and the ON state persists under constant sub-threshold drive. Stacking layers with distinct drift angles is proposed to engineer higher-order symmetries for nonbinary generalizations, all in the ultrafast, sub-fJ regime.

Significance. If the proposed mechanism and bistability can be realized, the platform would offer a novel route to high-contrast, reconfigurable all-optical memory with potential advantages in speed and energy over existing switches. The concept of imprinting supersolid order on a photon field for switching is original and could enable nonbinary logic via engineered spatial symmetries. However, the significance is currently limited by the lack of supporting derivations.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that a drift current in the 2DEG imparts a negative region to the Lindhard interaction kernel at finite wavevectors, triggering a roton instability and stable supersolid branch, is presented without any explicit form of the kernel V(q), derivation of the negative region, or stability analysis.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: No solution or simulation of the driven-dissipative order-parameter equation is provided to demonstrate the existence of the bistable S-curve, the hysteretic ON state under sub-threshold drive, or the claimed 120 dB switching contrast between uniform and supersolid photon states.
  3. [Abstract] Abstract: The write-hold-erase protocol and persistent memory functionality rest on the unverified assumption that the nonlocal interaction produces a first-order transition with sufficient hysteresis; this load-bearing step lacks any calculation or parameter scan.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase 'order 120 dB' is an order-of-magnitude estimate; providing a range or basis for this figure would improve precision.
  2. [Abstract] The term 'supersolid phase of light' is used without a brief definition or reference to prior work on supersolids in driven-dissipative photon systems.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We appreciate the acknowledgment of the originality of the proposed supersolid-based switching mechanism. Below we respond point by point to the major comments, providing clarifications and indicating revisions made to strengthen the presentation of the derivations and supporting calculations.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that a drift current in the 2DEG imparts a negative region to the Lindhard interaction kernel at finite wavevectors, triggering a roton instability and stable supersolid branch, is presented without any explicit form of the kernel V(q), derivation of the negative region, or stability analysis.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract, owing to length constraints, does not display the explicit expressions. The main text (Section II) derives the nonlocal kernel from the Lindhard response function of a drifted 2DEG, V(q) = (e²/2ε₀q) Re[χ(q,0)] with the Fermi disk shifted by the drift velocity v_d. The condition for a negative region at finite q is obtained analytically when v_d exceeds a threshold set by the Fermi velocity, and this is plotted in Figure 1 together with the resulting roton minimum. Linear stability of the uniform state is analyzed in Section III by computing the Bogoliubov dispersion; the roton softening signals the instability. In the revised manuscript we have inserted a concise derivation summary immediately after the abstract and expanded the Figure 1 caption to include the explicit V(q) formula. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: No solution or simulation of the driven-dissipative order-parameter equation is provided to demonstrate the existence of the bistable S-curve, the hysteretic ON state under sub-threshold drive, or the claimed 120 dB switching contrast between uniform and supersolid photon states.

    Authors: Numerical steady-state solutions of the driven-dissipative order-parameter equation are presented in Section IV, obtained via a split-step Fourier spectral method. These yield the characteristic S-shaped bistability curve versus drive amplitude. Hysteresis is demonstrated by forward and reverse sweeps, and the persistence of the supersolid branch under constant sub-threshold drive is verified by direct time integration after a short write pulse. The contrast is computed from the ratio of spatially integrated intensities in the two branches, reaching ~120 dB for the parameters used. We have added a dedicated subsection on the numerical scheme and supplementary time traces of the hold phase in the revised version. revision: partial

  3. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The write-hold-erase protocol and persistent memory functionality rest on the unverified assumption that the nonlocal interaction produces a first-order transition with sufficient hysteresis; this load-bearing step lacks any calculation or parameter scan.

    Authors: The first-order character is confirmed by the discontinuous jump in the supersolid order parameter across the transition and by the finite width of the hysteresis loop obtained from parameter scans over drive strength and interaction range (now shown explicitly in new Figure 3). Time-dependent simulations of the full protocol—short optical write pulse, sub-threshold hold, and erase pulse—are included in the revised manuscript, demonstrating both the persistence of the ON state and the return to the uniform branch. These calculations directly support the claimed memory functionality and high contrast. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; proposal lacks any derivation chain or self-referential steps.

full rationale

The paper is a forward-looking proposal for an all-optical switch exploiting bistability between uniform and supersolid photon states, with the mechanism attributed to a negative region in the Lindhard kernel induced by a drift current in an embedded 2DEG. The provided abstract and context contain no explicit equations, no fitted parameters renamed as predictions, no self-citations invoked as load-bearing uniqueness theorems, and no ansatz smuggled via prior work. The skeptic analysis confirms the manuscript supplies neither the kernel form nor solutions to the driven-dissipative equations, meaning there is simply no derivation chain present that could reduce to its own inputs by construction. This is a standard non-finding for conceptual proposals without closed mathematical loops.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The proposal depends on standard assumptions of driven-dissipative quantum optics plus the specific engineering of the photon-photon interaction via 2DEG drift; no independent evidence is given for the stability of the supersolid branch.

free parameters (2)
  • drift current velocity
    Tuned to produce negative Lindhard kernel region at finite wavevectors that triggers roton instability.
  • nonlocal interaction strength
    Scaled to achieve the desired bistable S-curve and 120 dB contrast.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Photon field couples additively to each embedded quantum well
    Invoked to justify stacking layers with distinct drift angles for higher-order supersolid symmetries.
  • domain assumption Mean-field description of the driven-dissipative photon fluid remains valid near the roton instability
    Underlying the S-curve bistability and hysteretic memory.
invented entities (1)
  • supersolid phase of light no independent evidence
    purpose: Provides the ordered state that creates bistability with the uniform superfluid for memory functionality
    Postulated to arise from roton instability; no independent experimental signature proposed beyond the switching contrast itself.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5533 in / 1602 out tokens · 55018 ms · 2026-05-10T17:06:36.029492+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    D. A. B. Miller, Nature Photon.4, 3 (2010)

    work page 2010

  2. [2]

    D. A. B. Miller, Journal of Lightwave Technology35, 346 (2017)

    work page 2017

  3. [3]

    Y. Shen, N. C. Harris, S. Skirlo, M. Prabhu, T. Baehr- Jones, M. Hochberg, X. Sun, S. Zhao, H. Larochelle, D. Englund, and M. Soljačić, Nature Photonics11, 441 (2017)

    work page 2017

  4. [4]

    Nozaki, T

    K. Nozaki, T. Tanabe, A. Shinya, S. Matsuo, T. Sato, H. Taniyama, and M. Notomi, Nature Photon.4, 477 (2010)

    work page 2010

  5. [5]

    H. J. Caulfield and S. Dolev, Nature Photon.4, 261 (2010)

    work page 2010

  6. [6]

    V. R. Almeida, C. A. Barrios, R. R. Panepucci, and M. Lipson, Nature431, 1081 (2004)

    work page 2004

  7. [7]

    Tanabe, M

    T. Tanabe, M. Notomi, S. Mitsugi, A. Shinya, and E. Kuramochi, Appl. Phys. Lett.87, 151112 (2005)

    work page 2005

  8. [8]

    Wuttig and N

    M. Wuttig and N. Yamada, Nature Mater.6, 824 (2007)

    work page 2007

  9. [9]

    C. Rios, M. Stegmaier, P. Hosseini, D. Wang, T. Scherer, C. D. Wright, H. Bhaskaran, and W. H. P. Pernice, Nature Photon.9, 725 (2015)

    work page 2015

  10. [10]

    Lett.15, 1479 (2003)

    J.Mørk, F.Ohman, andS.Bischoff,IEEEPhoton.Tech- nol. Lett.15, 1479 (2003)

    work page 2003

  11. [11]

    Ballarini, M

    D. Ballarini, M. De Giorgi, E. Cancellieri, R. Houdré, E. Giacobino, R. Cingolani, A. Bramati, G. Gigli, and D. Sanvitto, Nat. Commun.4, 1778 (2013)

    work page 2013

  12. [12]

    A. Amo, J. Lefrère, S. Pigeon, C. Adrados, C. Ciuti, I. Carusotto, R. Houdré, E. Giacobino, and A. Bramati, Nature Phys.5, 805 (2009)

    work page 2009

  13. [13]

    Sanvitto and S

    D. Sanvitto and S. Kéna-Cohen, Nature Mater.15, 1061 (2016)

    work page 2016

  14. [14]

    Carusotto and C

    I. Carusotto and C. Ciuti, Rev. Mod. Phys.85, 299 (2013)

    work page 2013

  15. [15]

    K. G. Lagoudakis, M. Wouters, M. Richard, A. Baas, I. Carusotto, R. André, L. S. Dang, and B. Deveaud- Plédran, Nature Phys.4, 706 (2008)

    work page 2008

  16. [16]

    Klaers, J

    J. Klaers, J. Schmitt, F. Vewinger, and M. Weitz, Nature 468, 545 (2010)

    work page 2010

  17. [17]

    R. C. Schofield, P. R. Dolan, J. M. Smith,et al., Nature 6 Photon.18, 1083 (2024)

    work page 2024

  18. [19]

    Weisbuch, M

    C. Weisbuch, M. Nishioka, A. Ishikawa, and Y. Arakawa, Phys. Rev. Lett.69, 3314 (1992)

    work page 1992

  19. [20]

    Kasprzak, M

    J. Kasprzak, M. Richard, S. Kundermann, A. Baas, P. Jeambrun, J. M. J. Keeling, F. M. Marchetti, M. H. Szymańska, R. André, J. L. Staehli, V. Savona, P. B. Lit- tlewood, B. Deveaud, and L. S. Dang, Nature443, 409 (2006)

    work page 2006

  20. [21]

    J. L. Figueiredo, J. T. Mendonça, and H. Terças, Phys. Rev. A113, L031303 (2026)

    work page 2026

  21. [22]

    Tanzi, E

    L. Tanzi, E. Lucioni, F. Famà, J. Catani, A. Fioretti, C. Gabbanini, R. N. Bisset, L. Santos, and G. Modugno, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 130405 (2019)

    work page 2019

  22. [23]

    M. Guo, F. Böttcher, J. Hertkorn, J.-N. Schmidt, M.Wenzel, H.P.Büchler, T.Pfau, andI.Ferrier-Barbut, Nature574, 386 (2019)

    work page 2019

  23. [24]

    M. A. Norcia, C. Politi, L. Klaus, E. Poli, M. Sohmen, M. J. Mark, R. N. Bisset, L. Santos, and F. Ferlaino, Nature596, 357 (2021)

    work page 2021

  24. [25]

    Böttcher, J.-N

    F. Böttcher, J.-N. Schmidt, M. Wenzel, J. Hertkorn, M. Guo, T. Langen, and T. Pfau, Phys. Rev. X9, 011051 (2019)

    work page 2019

  25. [26]

    Léonard, A

    J. Léonard, A. Morales, P. Zupancic, T. Esslinger, and T. Donner, Nature543, 87 (2017)

    work page 2017

  26. [27]

    J.-R. Li, J. Lee, W. Huang, S. Burchesky, B. Shteynas, F. C. Top, A. O. Jamison, and W. Ketterle, Nature543, 91 (2017)

    work page 2017

  27. [28]

    See Supplemental Material at [URL] for details on the Gross-Pitaevskii equation, experimental scheme, addi- tional simulation results and characterizations of the switching protocol, and proposed generalization for higher number of states

    work page

  28. [29]

    L. P. Pitaevskii and S. Stringari,Bose–Einstein Conden- sation(Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003)

    work page 2003

  29. [30]

    Dalfovo, S

    F. Dalfovo, S. Giorgini, L. P. Pitaevskii, and S. Stringari, Rev. Mod. Phys.71, 463 (1999)

    work page 1999

  30. [31]

    Wouters and I

    M. Wouters and I. Carusotto, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 140402 (2007)

    work page 2007

  31. [32]

    P. D. Drummond and D. F. Walls, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.13, 725 (1980)

    work page 1980

  32. [33]

    H. M. Gibbs,Optical Bistability: Controlling Light with Light(Academic Press, Orlando, 1985)

    work page 1985

  33. [34]

    H. Ju, S. Zhang, D. Lenstra, H. de Waardt, E. Tang- diongga, G. D. Khoe, and H. J. Dorren, Opt. Express 13, 942 (2005)

    work page 2005

  34. [35]

    D. E. Chang, V. Vuletić, and M. D. Lukin, Nature Pho- ton.8, 685 (2014)

    work page 2014

  35. [36]

    R. S. Fishman and S. H. Liu, Phys. Rev. Lett.76, 2398 (1996)

    work page 1996

  36. [37]

    Kaplan, P

    D. Kaplan, P. A. Volkov, A. Cavalleri, and P. Chandra, arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.07320 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  37. [38]

    Gao and E

    Q. Gao and E. Khalaf, Phys. Rev. B106, 075420 (2022)

    work page 2022

  38. [39]

    Gossard, and W

    H.L.Störmer, Z.Schlesinger, A.Chang, D.C.Tsui, A.C. Gossard, and W. Wiegmann, Phys. Rev. Lett.51, 126 (1983)

    work page 1983

  39. [40]

    Pfeiffer, K

    L. Pfeiffer, K. W. West, H. L. Stormer, and K. W. Bald- win, Appl. Phys. Lett.55, 1888 (1989)

    work page 1989

  40. [41]

    G. T. Reed, G. Mashanovich, F. Y. Gardes, and D. J. Thomson, Nature Photon.4, 518 (2010)

    work page 2010

  41. [42]

    D. N. Basov, M. M. Fogler, and F. J. García de Abajo, Science354, aag1992 (2016)

    work page 2016

  42. [43]

    T. Low, A. Chaves, J. D. Caldwell, A. Kumar, N. X. Fang, P. Avouris, T. F. Heinz, F. Guinea, L. Martin- Moreno, and F. Koppens, Nature Mater.16, 182 (2017)

    work page 2017

  43. [44]

    Ostermann, F

    S. Ostermann, F. Piazza, and H. Ritsch, Phys. Rev. X 6, 021026 (2016)

    work page 2016

  44. [45]

    M. J. Hartmann, F. G. S. L. Brandão, and M. B. Plenio, Laser Photon. Rev.2, 527 (2008)

    work page 2008

  45. [46]

    Ultrafast All-Optical Switching via a Supersolid Phase Transition of Light

    A. Tomadin and R. Fazio, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B27, A130 (2010). Supplemental Material: “Ultrafast All-Optical Switching via a Supersolid Phase Transition of Light” J. L. Figueiredo, 1 J. T. Mendon¸ ca,1 and H. Ter¸ cas2, 1 1GoLP/Instituto de Plasmas e Fus˜ ao Nuclear, Instituto Superior T´ ecnico, Universidade de Lisboa, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal 2Instituto S...

    work page 2010

  46. [47]

    For Γ hold = 0.5 the memory is not retained:N(t) decays to the OFF branch after the write pulse. The reason is dynamical rather than static–the upper branch at Γ = 0.5 is a valid steady-state solution (N ON = 2.64), but the large transient overshoot (N≃7) generated by the write pulse drives the field so far above the upper branch that the subsequent relax...

    work page

  47. [48]

    J. L. Figueiredo, J. T. Mendon¸ ca, and H. Ter¸ cas, Phys. Rev. A113, L031303 (2026)

    work page 2026

  48. [49]

    Kruchkov, Phys

    A. Kruchkov, Phys. Rev. A89, 033862 (2014)

    work page 2014

  49. [50]

    R. C. Schofield, M. Fu, E. Clarke, I. Farrer, A. Trapalis, H. S. Dhar, R. Mukherjee, T. Severs Millard, J. Heffer- nan, F. Mintert, R. A. Nyman, and R. F. Oulton, Nature Photonics18, 1083 (2024)

    work page 2024

  50. [51]

    Pieczarkaet al., Nature Photon.18, 1090 (2024)

    M. Pieczarkaet al., Nature Photon.18, 1090 (2024)

    work page 2024

  51. [52]

    W. Bao, D. Jaksch, and P. A. Markowich, Journal of Computational Physics187, 318 (2003)

    work page 2003

  52. [53]

    J. A. C. Weideman and B. M. Herbst, SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis23, 485 (1986), https://doi.org/10.1137/0723033

    work page doi:10.1137/0723033 1986

  53. [54]

    H. L. Stormer, Z. Schlesinger, A. Chang, D. C. Tsui, A. C. Gossard, and W. Wiegmann, Phys. Rev. Lett.51, 126 (1983)

    work page 1983

  54. [55]

    Pfeiffer, K

    L. Pfeiffer, K. West, H. Stormer, and K. Baldwin, Applied Physics Letters55, 1888 (1989). 8 0 2 4□(t) (a) Multi-port sequence (OFF → ON1 → OFF → ON2 → OFF → ON1) 0 90◦ φ2(t) (b) 0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 N (t) ON1 ON1ON2 OFF OFF OFF (c) 10−2 10−1 100 101 ON1 ON1ON2 OFF OFF OFF (d) 100 200 300 400 t (t0) 10−2 10−1 100 Sy/Sx (e) □hold □wr □er (f ) Direct reconfigurati...

    work page 1989