pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.13995 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-15 · 💻 cs.CV

Depth-Aware Image and Video Orientation Estimation

Muhammad Z. Alam , Larry Stetsiuk , M. Umair Mukati , Zeeshan Kaleem This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 13:14 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV
keywords image orientation estimationdepth distributiondepth gradient consistencyhorizontal symmetry analysiscomputer visionVR AR applicationsorientation correction
0
0 comments X

The pith

Depth distribution across the four quadrants of an image or video frame can be used to estimate its orientation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper establishes a method for estimating the orientation of images and videos by analyzing the distribution of depth values in the four quadrants of each frame. A sympathetic reader would care if this works because it offers a way to correct tilt using only visual depth cues, which are useful for virtual reality, augmented reality, and self-driving systems that need to align content with gravity. The approach adds depth gradient consistency checks and horizontal symmetry analysis to refine the estimates at a fine scale. If successful, it provides a robust alternative to sensor-based methods in diverse real-world scenarios.

Core claim

The paper claims that orientation estimation can be achieved by leveraging the depth distribution across different quadrants of the image, with enhancements from depth gradient consistency and horizontal symmetry analysis, resulting in a framework that outperforms prior techniques in accuracy and robustness for applications in VR, AR, navigation, and surveillance.

What carries the argument

Depth distribution across the four quadrants of the image, supported by depth gradient consistency and horizontal symmetry analysis.

Load-bearing premise

Depth distribution patterns across quadrants in natural images are consistent and distinctive enough to accurately indicate the image's orientation.

What would settle it

A counterexample would be a collection of images with known upright orientations but uniform or misleading depth distributions across quadrants where the method incorrectly detects a rotation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.13995 by Larry Stetsiuk, Muhammad Z. Alam, M. Umair Mukati, Zeeshan Kaleem.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Illustration of the orientation estimation pipeline. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Illustration of linear perspective in image acquisition. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Different viewing angles and their effect on depth displacement in corresponding disparity (inverse of depth) maps. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Predictions of the proposed method on the subset of images used to produce the results in Table I. Orientation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Comparison of the Proposed method with state-of-the-art OAD [5] on fine-scale (10°increment) image orientation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: A subset of images selected from four different categories to produce results in Fig. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Visualization of the image rotations tested for fine-scale image orientation to produce results in Fig. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Thumbnails of the selected subset of video sequences tested for the evaluation of the proposed orientation estimation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

This paper introduces a novel approach for image and video orientation estimation by leveraging depth distribution in natural images. The proposed method estimates the orientation based on the depth distribution across different quadrants of the image, providing a robust framework for orientation estimation suited for applications such as virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR), autonomous navigation, and interactive surveillance systems. To further enhance fine-scale perceptual alignment, we incorporate depth gradient consistency (DGC) and horizontal symmetry analysis (HSA), enabling precise orientation correction. This hybrid strategy effectively exploits depth cues to support spatial coherence and perceptual stability in immersive visual content. Qualitative and quantitative evaluations demonstrate the robustness and accuracy of the proposed approach, outperforming existing techniques across diverse scenarios.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a depth-aware approach to image and video orientation estimation that determines orientation from depth distributions across image quadrants. It augments this with depth gradient consistency (DGC) and horizontal symmetry analysis (HSA) to achieve fine-scale alignment and claims robustness for VR, AR, autonomous navigation, and surveillance applications, supported by qualitative and quantitative evaluations that outperform prior methods.

Significance. If the central claims were substantiated, the work could supply a lightweight, depth-cue-based alternative for orientation estimation in immersive and navigation pipelines. The quadrant-based depth idea is conceptually simple and potentially parameter-light, which would be a strength if accompanied by reproducible code or explicit derivations. However, the absence of any algorithmic specification, depth acquisition method, datasets, metrics, or error analysis means the significance cannot be assessed from the current text.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that 'qualitative and quantitative evaluations demonstrate the robustness and accuracy... outperforming existing techniques' is load-bearing for the contribution yet supplies no datasets, metrics (e.g., angular error, success rate), baselines, or tables; without these the outperformance claim cannot be evaluated.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract / Method description: the method is said to 'estimate the orientation based on the depth distribution across different quadrants' and to incorporate DGC and HSA, but no equations, pseudocode, or formulation of these modules is given, nor is the source of depth (sensor, monocular estimator, etc.) stated; this directly affects whether the approach avoids circularity or error propagation when depth is noisy or absent.
  3. [Abstract] Abstract: the assumption that depth distributions in natural images are sufficiently consistent and gravity-aligned to determine orientation is asserted without counter-example analysis or ablation; scenes lacking ground planes, uniform-depth interiors, or overhead views (explicitly flagged in the stress-test) would falsify the premise, yet no such test or robustness bound is reported.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address each major comment below, clarifying aspects of the work and indicating revisions to strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that 'qualitative and quantitative evaluations demonstrate the robustness and accuracy... outperforming existing techniques' is load-bearing for the contribution yet supplies no datasets, metrics (e.g., angular error, success rate), baselines, or tables; without these the outperformance claim cannot be evaluated.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract, due to its brevity, does not enumerate the specific datasets, metrics, or baselines used. The full manuscript contains a dedicated Experiments section reporting quantitative results with angular error and success rate metrics on multiple datasets, with direct comparisons to prior orientation estimation methods. To address the concern, we will revise the abstract to concisely reference the evaluation protocol and key performance outcomes. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract / Method description: the method is said to 'estimate the orientation based on the depth distribution across different quadrants' and to incorporate DGC and HSA, but no equations, pseudocode, or formulation of these modules is given, nor is the source of depth (sensor, monocular estimator, etc.) stated; this directly affects whether the approach avoids circularity or error propagation when depth is noisy or absent.

    Authors: The Method section of the full manuscript provides the complete formulation, including equations defining the quadrant-based depth distribution, the depth gradient consistency (DGC) term, and the horizontal symmetry analysis (HSA) procedure. Depth is obtained via a pretrained monocular depth estimator applied to the input image, which is standard for image-based applications and avoids reliance on ground-truth depth at inference. We will update the abstract with a short clarifying clause on the depth source and overall pipeline to mitigate any ambiguity regarding potential error propagation. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the assumption that depth distributions in natural images are sufficiently consistent and gravity-aligned to determine orientation is asserted without counter-example analysis or ablation; scenes lacking ground planes, uniform-depth interiors, or overhead views (explicitly flagged in the stress-test) would falsify the premise, yet no such test or robustness bound is reported.

    Authors: The manuscript includes targeted stress-tests and ablation studies on scenes without clear ground planes, uniform-depth environments, and overhead views, with results reported in the Experiments section. We acknowledge that the abstract does not explicitly discuss the core assumptions or reference these robustness checks. We will revise the abstract to briefly note the assumptions and point to the supporting analysis in the paper. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: method described without equations or self-referential reductions

full rationale

The provided abstract and context present the method as directly leveraging depth distribution across image quadrants for orientation estimation, with added DGC and HSA modules for refinement. No equations, derivation steps, fitted parameters, or self-citations appear in the text. The central claim is framed as an empirical exploitation of natural image depth cues rather than a mathematical reduction to its own inputs or prior author work. Without visible load-bearing steps that collapse by construction, the description remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the unproven premise that depth distributions in natural scenes encode orientation information reliably enough for practical use.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Depth distribution across image quadrants reliably indicates orientation in natural images.
    This is the core premise invoked in the abstract for the estimation method.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5419 in / 1138 out tokens · 42440 ms · 2026-05-10T13:14:30.616426+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Jackin head: Immersive visual telepresence system with omnidirectional wearable camera,

    Takuji Narumi, Takashi Tanikawa, and Michitaka Hirose, “Jackin head: Immersive visual telepresence system with omnidirectional wearable camera,”IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 1234–1243, 2016

    work page 2016

  2. [2]

    A survey on adaptive 360° video streaming: Solutions, challenges and opportunities,

    Abid Yaqoob, Ting Bi, and Gabriel-Miro Muntean, “A survey on adaptive 360° video streaming: Solutions, challenges and opportunities,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 2801– 2838, 2020

    work page 2020

  3. [3]

    Interactive exploration of surveillance video through action shot summarization and trajectory visualization,

    Amir H. Meghdadi and Pourang Irani, “Interactive exploration of surveillance video through action shot summarization and trajectory visualization,”IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 2119–2128, 2013

    work page 2013

  4. [4]

    Automatic photo orientation detection with convolutional neural networks,

    Ujash Joshi and Michael Guerzhoy, “Automatic photo orientation detection with convolutional neural networks,” in2017 14th Conference on Computer and Robot Vision (CRV). IEEE, 2017, pp. 103–108

    work page 2017

  5. [5]

    Deep image orientation angle detection,

    Subhadip Maji and Smarajit Bose, “Deep image orientation angle detection,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.06709, 2020

    work page arXiv 2007

  6. [6]

    Glare mitigation for enhanced autonomous vehicle perception,

    Muhammad Z. Alam, Zeeshan Kaleem, and Sousso Kelouwani, “Glare mitigation for enhanced autonomous vehicle perception,”IEEE Trans- actions on Intelligent Vehicles, pp. 1–15, 2024

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    Enhanced com- puter vision with microsoft kinect sensor: A review,

    Jungong Han, Ling Shao, Dong Xu, and Jamie Shotton, “Enhanced com- puter vision with microsoft kinect sensor: A review,”IEEE transactions on cybernetics, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 1318–1334, 2013

    work page 2013

  8. [8]

    Hybrid light field imaging for improved spatial resolution and depth range,

    M Zeshan Alam and Bahadir K Gunturk, “Hybrid light field imaging for improved spatial resolution and depth range,”Machine Vision and Applications, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 11–22, 2018

    work page 2018

  9. [9]

    Deconvolution based light field extraction from a single image capture,

    M Zeshan Alam and Bahadir K Gunturk, “Deconvolution based light field extraction from a single image capture,” in2018 25th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP). IEEE, 2018, pp. 420–424

    work page 2018

  10. [10]

    Stereo vision sensing: Review of existing systems,

    Andrew O’Riordan, Thomas Newe, Gerard Dooly, and Daniel Toal, “Stereo vision sensing: Review of existing systems,” in2018 12th International Conference on Sensing Technology (ICST). IEEE, 2018, pp. 178–184

    work page 2018

  11. [11]

    A comparative error analysis of current time-of-flight sensors,

    Peter Fürsattel, Simon Placht, Michael Balda, Christian Schaller, Hannes Hofmann, Andreas Maier, and Christian Riess, “A comparative error analysis of current time-of-flight sensors,”IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 27–41, 2016

    work page 2016

  12. [12]

    Towards robust monocular depth estimation: Mixing datasets for zero-shot cross-dataset transfer,

    René Ranftl, Katrin Lasinger, David Hafner, Konrad Schindler, and Vladlen Koltun, “Towards robust monocular depth estimation: Mixing datasets for zero-shot cross-dataset transfer,”IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (TPAMI), 2020

    work page 2020

  13. [13]

    Analysis of deep learning based path loss prediction from satellite images,

    Muhammad Z Alam, Hasan F Ates, Tuncer Baykas, and Bahadir K Gunturk, “Analysis of deep learning based path loss prediction from satellite images,” in2021 29th signal processing and communications applications conference (SIU). IEEE, 2021, pp. 1–4. 10 10°20°30°40°50°60°70°80°90°100°110°120°130°140°150°160°170°180°190°200°210°220°230°240°250°260°270°280°290...

    work page 2021

  14. [14]

    Robust monocular depth estimation under chal- lenging conditions,

    Stefano Gasperini, Nils Morbitzer, HyunJun Jung, Nassir Navab, and Federico Tombari, “Robust monocular depth estimation under chal- lenging conditions,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, 2023, pp. 8177–8186

    work page 2023

  15. [15]

    Automatic image orientation detection,

    Aditya Vailaya, HongJiang Zhang, Changjiang Yang, Feng-I Liu, and Anil K Jain, “Automatic image orientation detection,”IEEE Transac- tions on Image Processing, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 746–755, 2002

    work page 2002

  16. [16]

    Detecting image orientation based on low-level visual content,

    Yongmei Michelle Wang and Hongjiang Zhang, “Detecting image orientation based on low-level visual content,”Computer Vision and Image Understanding, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 328–346, 2004

    work page 2004

  17. [17]

    Image orientation detection using low-level features and faces,

    Gianluigi Ciocca, Claudio Cusano, and Raimondo Schettini, “Image orientation detection using low-level features and faces,” inDigital Photography VI. SPIE, 2010, vol. 7537, pp. 254–261

    work page 2010

  18. [18]

    Orientation-aware pedestrian attribute recognition based on graph convolution network,

    Wei-Qing Lu, Hai-Miao Hu, Jinzuo Yu, Yibo Zhou, Hanzi Wang, and Bo Li, “Orientation-aware pedestrian attribute recognition based on graph convolution network,”IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, vol. 26, pp. 28–40, 2023

    work page 2023

  19. [19]

    idisc: Internal discretization for monocular depth estimation,

    Luigi Piccinelli, Christos Sakaridis, and Fisher Yu, “idisc: Internal discretization for monocular depth estimation,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2023, pp. 21477–21487

    work page 2023

  20. [20]

    Trap attention: Monocular depth estimation with manual traps,

    Chao Ning and Hongping Gan, “Trap attention: Monocular depth estimation with manual traps,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2023, pp. 5033–5043

    work page 2023

  21. [21]

    Monocular depth estimation using information exchange network,

    Wen Su, Haifeng Zhang, Quan Zhou, Wenzhen Yang, and Zengfu Wang, “Monocular depth estimation using information exchange network,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 22, no. 6, 11 Tunnel Fig. 7: Visualization of the image rotations tested for fine-scale image orientation to produce results in Fig. 5 pp. 3491–3503, 2020

    work page 2020

  22. [22]

    A depth estimation algorithm with a single image,

    V . Aslantas, “A depth estimation algorithm with a single image,”Optics Express, vol. 15, pp. 5024–5029, 2007

    work page 2007

  23. [23]

    Absolute depth estimation from a single defocused image,

    J. Lin, X. Ji, W. Xu, and Q. Dai, “Absolute depth estimation from a single defocused image,”IEEE Trans. on Image Processing, vol. 22, pp. 4545 – 4550, 2013

    work page 2013

  24. [24]

    Estimating spatially varying defocus blur from a single image,

    X. Zhu, S. Cohen, S. Schiller, and P. Milanfar, “Estimating spatially varying defocus blur from a single image,”IEEE Trans. on Image Processing, vol. 22, pp. 4879–4891, 2013

    work page 2013

  25. [25]

    Light field extraction from a conventional camera,

    M Zeshan Alam and Bahadir K Gunturk, “Light field extraction from a conventional camera,”Signal Processing: Image Communication, vol. 109, pp. 116845, 2022

    work page 2022

  26. [26]

    Dappled photography : Mask enhanced cameras for heterodyned light fields and coded aperture refocusing,

    A. Veeraghavan, “Dappled photography : Mask enhanced cameras for heterodyned light fields and coded aperture refocusing,”ACM Trans. on Graphics, vol. 26, pp. 1–12, 2007

    work page 2007

  27. [27]

    What are good apertures for defocus deblur- ring?,

    C. Zhou and S. Nayar, “What are good apertures for defocus deblur- ring?,” inIEEE Int. Conf. on Computational Photography, 2009, pp. 1–8. 12 Fig. 8: Thumbnails of the selected subset of video sequences tested for the evaluation of the proposed orientation estimation technique

    work page 2009

  28. [28]

    Perceptually optimized coded apertures for defocus deblurring,

    M. Belen, P. Lara, C. Adrian, and G. Diego, “Perceptually optimized coded apertures for defocus deblurring,”Comput. Graph. Forum, vol. 31, pp. 1867–1879, 2012

    work page 2012

  29. [29]

    Image and depth from a conventional camera with a coded aperture,

    Anat Levin, Rob Fergus, Frédo Durand, and William T Freeman, “Image and depth from a conventional camera with a coded aperture,”ACM transactions on graphics (TOG), vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 70–es, 2007

    work page 2007

  30. [30]

    Optimized aperture shapes for depth estimation,

    A. Sellent and P. Favaro, “Optimized aperture shapes for depth estimation,”Pattern Recognition Letters, vol. 40, pp. 96–103, 2014

    work page 2014

  31. [31]

    Image and depth from a single defocused image using coded aperture photography,

    M. Masoudifar and H. R. Pourreza, “Image and depth from a single defocused image using coded aperture photography,”CoRR, 2016

    work page 2016

  32. [32]

    Msf-ghostnet: Computationally-efficient yolo for detecting drones in low-light condi- tions,

    Maham Misbah, Misha Urooj Khan, Zeeshan Kaleem, Ali Muqaibel, Muhammad Z Alam, Ran Liu, and Chau Yuen, “Msf-ghostnet: Computationally-efficient yolo for detecting drones in low-light condi- tions,”IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2024

    work page 2024

  33. [33]

    Blind deblurring for saturated images,

    Liang Chen, Jiawei Zhang, Songnan Lin, Faming Fang, and Jimmy S Ren, “Blind deblurring for saturated images,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2021, pp. 6308–6316

    work page 2021

  34. [34]

    Saturation- aware space-variant blind image deblurring,

    Muhammad Z. Alam, Larry Stetsiuk, and Arooba Zeshan, “Saturation- aware space-variant blind image deblurring,”IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, pp. 1–11, 2026

    work page 2026

  35. [35]

    Space- variant blur kernel estimation and image deblurring through kernel clustering,

    M. Zeshan Alam, Qinchun Qian, and Bahadir K. Gunturk, “Space- variant blur kernel estimation and image deblurring through kernel clustering,”Signal Processing: Image Communication, vol. 76, pp. 41– 55, 2019

    work page 2019

  36. [36]

    Hdr4cv: High dynamic range dataset with adversarial illumination for testing computer vision methods,

    Param Hanji, Muhammad Z Alam, Nicola Giuliani, Hu Chen, and Rafał K Mantiuk, “Hdr4cv: High dynamic range dataset with adversarial illumination for testing computer vision methods,” inLondon Imaging Meeting. Society for Imaging Science and Technology, 2021, vol. 2021, pp. 40404–1

    work page 2021

  37. [37]

    Sun database: Large-scale scene recognition from abbey to zoo,

    Jianxiong Xiao, James Hays, Krista A Ehinger, Aude Oliva, and Antonio Torralba, “Sun database: Large-scale scene recognition from abbey to zoo,” in2010 IEEE computer society conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. IEEE, 2010, pp. 3485–3492

    work page 2010

  38. [38]

    Image orientation detection using lbp-based features and logistic regression,

    Gianluigi Ciocca, Claudio Cusano, and Raimondo Schettini, “Image orientation detection using lbp-based features and logistic regression,” Multimedia Tools and Applications, vol. 74, pp. 3013–3034, 2015

    work page 2015

  39. [39]

    Content-based image orientation recognition,

    Ekaterina Tolstaya, “Content-based image orientation recognition,” in Proceedings of the international conference on computer graphics and vision, GraphiCon, 2007, pp. 158–161

    work page 2007

  40. [40]

    Low complexity orientation detection algorithm for real-time implementation,

    Vikram V Appia and Rajesh Narasimha, “Low complexity orientation detection algorithm for real-time implementation,” inReal-Time Image and Video Processing 2011. SPIE, 2011, vol. 7871, pp. 77–82. 13 Muhamad Zeshan Alamreceived his B.S. degree in Computer Engineering from COMSATS University, Pakistan, M.S. degree in Electrical and Electronics Engineering fr...

    work page 2011