pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.21574 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-23 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.stat-mech· cond-mat.str-el

Generalized stochastic spin-wave theory for open quantum spin systems

Zejian Li , Anna Delmonte , Rosario Fazio This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 22:01 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.stat-mechcond-mat.str-el
keywords open quantum systemsspin-wave theoryquantum trajectoriesdriven-dissipative Ising modelphase transitionssemiclassical approximationsmany-body physics
0
0 comments X

The pith

A semiclassical spin-wave method on quantum trajectories simulates large open quantum spin systems with short-range interactions and local jumps.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a generalized stochastic spin-wave theory for open quantum spin systems. It applies semiclassical approximations not to the averaged state but to individual quantum trajectories obtained by unraveling the master equation. This allows the method to work in regimes with short-range interactions and local dissipation processes that break conventional spin-wave theories. The framework is tested on a variable-range driven-dissipative Ising model in two dimensions, where it identifies how the range of interactions and the direction of dissipation determine whether phase transitions are continuous or first-order. Such a tool makes it feasible to explore the non-equilibrium behavior of large interacting spin systems numerically.

Core claim

We propose a semiclassical framework for solving open quantum dynamics in driven-dissipative spin systems. Our method consists of generalized spin-wave approximations tailored to describing quantum trajectories unravelled from the master equation, and generically applies to regimes beyond the reach of conventional spin-wave theories, including short-range interactions and local quantum jumps, enabling the efficient simulation of large-scale interacting spins. We illustrate the versatility of our framework by studying a variable-range driven-dissipative Ising model on a 2D lattice. When the dissipation acts along the drive axis, we find a continuous phase transition breaking the Z2 symmetry,

What carries the argument

Generalized spin-wave approximations applied to quantum trajectories unravelled from the master equation.

Load-bearing premise

The semiclassical spin-wave expansion accurately describes the dynamics even when applied to individual stochastic trajectories that include local quantum jumps and short-range interactions.

What would settle it

Direct comparison of steady-state magnetization or correlation functions obtained from the generalized spin-wave theory against exact solutions of the master equation for small lattices with nearest-neighbor interactions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.21574 by Anna Delmonte, Rosario Fazio, Zejian Li.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Semiclassical representation of driven-dissipative spin dynamics with the generalized framework of spin-wave quantum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Pictorial summary of our main results on Model I [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Benchmark of the spin-wave quantum trajectories (SWQT) with heterodyne (het.) unraveling for a 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) SWQT heterodyne dynamics for a single trajec [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Steady-state magnetization X 2 as a function of γ in a 10 × 10 lattice, for different interaction ranges represented by α, shown together with the mean-field result (see legend). manifest via a non-vanishing spin-wave density provid￾ing a correction to the classical (zeroth-order) compo￾nent of the theory. The most evident effect is a shifted critical point, which can already be observed at finite sizes [… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Steady-state results for the same quantities as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Finite-size scaling parameters as a function of inter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: SWQT quantum jump (QJ) benchmark results for a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: SWQT quantum jump (QJ) results for a 2D spin [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_10.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We propose a semiclassical framework for solving open quantum dynamics in driven-dissipative spin systems. Our method consists of generalized spin-wave approximations tailored to describing quantum trajectories unravelled from the master equation, and generically applies to regimes beyond the reach of conventional spin-wave theories, including short-range interactions and local quantum jumps, enabling the efficient simulation of large-scale interacting spins. We illustrate the versatility of our framework by studying a variable-range driven-dissipative Ising model on a 2D lattice. When the dissipation acts along the drive axis, we find a continuous phase transition breaking the $\mathbb{Z}_2$ symmetry, and demonstrate that the interaction range, when tuned from fully-connected to nearest-neighbour, profoundly alters the universality class of the criticality. With the dissipation along the interaction axis, we show the emergence of a first-order transition. Demonstrated with both state-diffusion and quantum-jump types of trajectory dynamics, our framework provides a powerful toolbox for the efficient semiclassical description of non-equilibrium dynamics and many-body phases in spin systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a generalized stochastic spin-wave theory for open quantum spin systems, extending semiclassical approximations to quantum trajectories unravelled from the Lindblad master equation. It claims this framework applies beyond conventional spin-wave limits to short-range interactions and local quantum jumps, enabling large-scale simulations. Applied to a variable-range driven-dissipative Ising model on a 2D lattice, the work reports a continuous Z2 symmetry-breaking phase transition whose universality class depends on interaction range (fully connected to nearest-neighbor), a first-order transition when dissipation aligns with the interaction axis, and results for both state-diffusion and quantum-jump unravelings.

Significance. If the approximation's accuracy is established, the framework would provide an efficient tool for accessing non-equilibrium criticality and many-body phases in dissipative spin systems at scales beyond exact methods, particularly highlighting how interaction range tunes universality classes outside the fully-connected limit.

major comments (3)
  1. [Method (generalized spin-wave expansion)] The central applicability claim (short-range interactions and local jumps) rests on the semiclassical truncation remaining accurate for stochastic trajectories, but no controlled error bounds, 1/S expansion analysis, or discussion of O(1) site deviations from local jumps are provided.
  2. [Results on phase transitions] The reported change in universality class for the continuous transition (interaction range tuned from fully-connected to nearest-neighbor) lacks finite-size scaling, exponent extraction details, or comparison to known limits (e.g., mean-field vs. 2D Ising), undermining the criticality findings.
  3. [Numerical illustrations and validation] No direct benchmarks against exact small-lattice trajectory simulations (e.g., 4x4 systems) are reported to validate quantitative accuracy when local jumps and short-range couplings are present, which is required to support the efficiency and applicability claims.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Model definition] Clarify the precise definition and interpolation of the variable-range interaction parameter in the model Hamiltonian.
  2. [Figures] Ensure figures for phase diagrams and trajectories include explicit labels distinguishing state-diffusion vs. quantum-jump results.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for providing constructive feedback. We address each major comment point by point below, indicating the revisions we plan to incorporate.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Method (generalized spin-wave expansion)] The central applicability claim (short-range interactions and local jumps) rests on the semiclassical truncation remaining accurate for stochastic trajectories, but no controlled error bounds, 1/S expansion analysis, or discussion of O(1) site deviations from local jumps are provided.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript lacks a formal 1/S expansion analysis or controlled error bounds for the generalized spin-wave truncation applied to stochastic trajectories. The framework is presented as a practical semiclassical approximation supported by numerical results, but without rigorous bounds on deviations arising from local jumps. We will revise the manuscript to include a new discussion subsection on the validity regime, providing qualitative arguments for why O(1) site deviations do not preclude accurate large-scale dynamics, along with references to related semiclassical analyses in closed systems. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results on phase transitions] The reported change in universality class for the continuous transition (interaction range tuned from fully-connected to nearest-neighbor) lacks finite-size scaling, exponent extraction details, or comparison to known limits (e.g., mean-field vs. 2D Ising), undermining the criticality findings.

    Authors: The referee is correct that the current manuscript does not present detailed finite-size scaling collapses, explicit critical exponent values, or direct comparisons to mean-field or 2D Ising universality classes. Our statements on the interaction-range dependence of the universality class rely on qualitative changes in scaling behavior observed across system sizes. We will add finite-size scaling analysis, including data collapses and estimated exponents, together with comparisons to the expected mean-field limit for long-range interactions and the 2D Ising class for nearest-neighbor cases. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Numerical illustrations and validation] No direct benchmarks against exact small-lattice trajectory simulations (e.g., 4x4 systems) are reported to validate quantitative accuracy when local jumps and short-range couplings are present, which is required to support the efficiency and applicability claims.

    Authors: We acknowledge that direct validation against exact trajectory simulations on small lattices is absent and would strengthen the applicability claims. Although the focus is on large-scale simulations, we will add an appendix with benchmarks for 4x4 and similar small systems, comparing the generalized spin-wave results to exact quantum trajectory simulations for both state-diffusion and quantum-jump unravelings under short-range couplings. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; method is a self-contained extension of standard approximations

full rationale

The paper proposes a generalized spin-wave framework for unravelled quantum trajectories in open spin systems, applying it to a variable-range Ising model to identify phase transitions and universality classes. No step reduces a claimed result to a fitted input, self-defined quantity, or load-bearing self-citation by construction. The central claims rest on the application of the semiclassical truncation to stochastic trajectories, which is presented as an independent methodological advance rather than a tautological renaming or prediction forced by prior definitions within the text. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of semiclassical approximations applied to stochastic trajectories and on the standard Lindblad master equation for open quantum systems; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The dynamics of the open spin system are governed by a Lindblad master equation that can be unraveled into individual quantum trajectories.
    Standard assumption in open quantum systems theory invoked to justify the trajectory-based approach.
  • ad hoc to paper A spin-wave expansion around a classical mean-field direction remains valid for the stochastic trajectories even with short-range couplings and local jumps.
    The generalization that enables the method; its accuracy is the load-bearing assumption.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5485 in / 1510 out tokens · 37999 ms · 2026-05-09T22:01:34.236667+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 66 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Note that the frame ˆQi is kept constant within this step, which implies that the local ˜zi axes no longer align with the individual spins after the update asδβ i ̸= 0 in general

    Calculate the infinitesimal increments for the Gaus- sian parametersδβ i,δu ij, andδv ij using the stochastic master equation, and update these quan- tities with the increments. Note that the frame ˆQi is kept constant within this step, which implies that the local ˜zi axes no longer align with the individual spins after the update asδβ i ̸= 0 in general

    work page

  2. [2]

    1 (c)] such thatβ i = 0 after the rotation

    Update local frames ˆQi each along ageodesicro- tation [see Fig. 1 (c)] such thatβ i = 0 after the rotation. This can be achieved self-consistently by considering the evolution of the bosonic mode ˆbi generated by the (passive) rotation of the frame alone. Finally, increase the time byδtand start a new iteration. From the procedure described above, we not...

    work page

  3. [3]

    3, where both the spin-wave quantum trajectories (SWQT) and the exact ones are solved with the same fixed time step dtand the noise realization in the heterodyne dynamics

    Benchmark To demonstrate the validity of the (unconventional and possibly counterintuitive) local spin-wave approx- imations, we first benchmark this method against ex- act solutions in a small system withN= 2×2 spins ath= 2γ,J= 0.5γand nearest-neighbor interactions (α=∞), as shown in Fig. 3, where both the spin-wave quantum trajectories (SWQT) and the ex...

    work page

  4. [4]

    As described in Sec

    Symmetry breaking along trajectories Let us now apply the generalized SWQT framework to larger system sizes and study the temporal trajectory dynamics in the power-law spin system. As described in Sec. II, the Liouvillian of the model I admits aZ 2 symmetry due to its invariance under the transformation ˆsx,y i 7→ −ˆsx,y. This implies that at any finite s...

    work page

  5. [5]

    magnetization

    Steady-state phases with long-range interactionsα= 1 The dynamics presented in the previous section sug- gests the onset of a symmetry-breaking phase transition in the steady-state of the dynamics. To probe the order- disorder crossover at finiteN, we adopt the two-point correlation functionX 2 defined in Eq. (33) as the or- der parameter, which effective...

    work page

  6. [6]

    worst-case scenarios

    Universality class crossover One of the advantages of the generalized SWQT frame- work is that its applicability reaches beyond the usual long-range (α < d) regime typically required by the con- ventional spin-wave theory, and we now embark on the investigation of the effect of different interaction ranges on the symmetry-breaking phase transition. At sho...

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    Heterodyne dynamics Within the Gaussian approximation, the heterodyne equation (6) translates into the stochastic dynamics of the variational parameters, which are conveniently de- scribed by the adjoint stochastic master equation. For a time-independent operator ˆO, its expectation value along the heterodyne dynamics evolves as follows, d⟨ ˆO⟩= dt⟨L ‡ ˆO...

    work page

  8. [8]

    Quantum-jump dynamics Similar to our previous treatment, to find the stochas- tic dynamics governing the Gaussian variational param- eters, we proceed by first recasting the quantum-jump 14 equation (9) in its adjoint form, d⟨ ˆO⟩= dt ( i D [ ˆH, ˆO] E − 1 2 X i D H‡[ˆL† i ˆLi] ˆO E) + X i dMi(t) D J ‡[ˆLi] ˆO E , (B7) where the adjoint superoperators rea...

    work page

  9. [9]

    Fazio, J

    R. Fazio, J. Keeling, L. Mazza, and M. Schir` o, Many- body open quantum systems, SciPost Physics Lecture Notes , 099 (2025)

    work page 2025

  10. [10]

    Breuer and F

    H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione,The theory of open quantum systems(OUP Oxford, 2002)

    work page 2002

  11. [11]

    Preskill, Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond, Quantum2, 79 (2018)

    J. Preskill, Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond, Quantum2, 79 (2018)

    work page 2018

  12. [12]

    H. M. Wiseman and G. J. Milburn,Quantum measure- ment and control(Cambridge university press, 2009)

    work page 2009

  13. [13]

    Greiner, O

    M. Greiner, O. Mandel, T. Esslinger, T. W. H¨ ansch, and I. Bloch, Quantum phase transition from a superfluid to a mott insulator in a gas of ultracold atoms, Nature415, 39 (2002)

    work page 2002

  14. [14]

    Gross and I

    C. Gross and I. Bloch, Quantum simulations with ultra- cold atoms in optical lattices, Science357, 995 (2017)

    work page 2017

  15. [15]

    Monroe, W

    C. Monroe, W. C. Campbell, L.-M. Duan, Z.-X. Gong, A. V. Gorshkov, P. W. Hess, R. Islam, K. Kim, N. M. Linke, G. Pagano, P. Richerme, C. Senko, and N. Y. Yao, Programmable quantum simulations of spin systems with trapped ions, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 025001 (2021)

    work page 2021

  16. [16]

    Blais, A

    A. Blais, A. L. Grimsmo, S. M. Girvin, and A. Wall- raff, Circuit quantum electrodynamics, Reviews of Mod- ern Physics93, 025005 (2021)

    work page 2021

  17. [17]

    Blais, S

    A. Blais, S. M. Girvin, and W. D. Oliver, Quantum infor- mation processing and quantum optics with circuit quan- tum electrodynamics, Nature Physics16, 247 (2020)

    work page 2020

  18. [18]

    D. L. Underwood, W. E. Shanks, J. Koch, and A. A. Houck, Low-disorder microwave cavity lattices for quan- tum simulation with photons, Phys. Rev. A86, 023837 (2012)

    work page 2012

  19. [19]

    Safavi-Naini, R

    A. Safavi-Naini, R. J. Lewis-Swan, J. G. Bohnet, M. G¨ arttner, K. A. Gilmore, J. E. Jordan, J. Cohn, J. K. Freericks, A. M. Rey, and J. J. Bollinger, Verification of a many-ion simulator of the dicke model through slow quenches across a phase transition, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 040503 (2018)

    work page 2018

  20. [20]

    D. C. Cole, J. J. Wu, S. D. Erickson, P.-Y. Hou, A. C. Wilson, D. Leibfried, and F. Reiter, Dissipative prepara- tion of w states in trapped ion systems, New Journal of Physics23, 073001 (2021)

    work page 2021

  21. [21]

    Leghtas, S

    Z. Leghtas, S. Touzard, I. M. Pop, A. Kou, B. Vlastakis, A. Petrenko, K. M. Sliwa, A. Narla, S. Shankar, M. J. Hatridge,et al., Confining the state of light to a quantum manifold by engineered two-photon loss, Science (New York, N.Y.)347, 853 (2015)

    work page 2015

  22. [22]

    Fitzpatrick, N

    M. Fitzpatrick, N. M. Sundaresan, A. C. Y. Li, J. Koch, and A. A. Houck, Observation of a dissipative phase tran- sition in a one-dimensional circuit qed lattice, Phys. Rev. X7, 011016 (2017)

    work page 2017

  23. [23]

    Pieczarka, E

    M. Pieczarka, E. Estrecho, M. Boozarjmehr, O. Bleu, M. Steger, K. West, L. N. Pfeiffer, D. W. Snoke, J. Levin- sen, M. M. Parish, A. G. Truscott, and E. A. Ostro- vskaya, Observation of quantum depletion in a non- equilibrium exciton–polariton condensate, Nature Com- munications11, 10.1038/s41467-019-14243-6 (2020)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-019-14243-6 2020

  24. [24]

    G. W. Castellanos, M. Ramezani, S. Murai, and J. G´ omez Rivas, Non-equilibrium bose–einstein conden- sation of exciton-polaritons in silicon metasurfaces, Ad- vanced Optical Materials11, 2202305 (2023)

    work page 2023

  25. [25]

    Z. Li, F. Claude, T. Boulier, E. Giacobino, Q. Glo- rieux, A. Bramati, and C. Ciuti, Dissipative phase transi- tion with driving-controlled spatial dimension and diffu- sive boundary conditions, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 093601 (2022)

    work page 2022

  26. [26]

    Mei, B.-W

    Q.-X. Mei, B.-W. Li, Y.-K. Wu, M.-L. Cai, Y. Wang, L. Yao, Z.-C. Zhou, and L.-M. Duan, Experimental re- alization of the rabi-hubbard model with trapped ions, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 160504 (2022)

    work page 2022

  27. [27]

    L. M. Sieberer, M. Buchhold, and S. Diehl, Keldysh field theory for driven open quantum systems, Rep. Prog. Phys.79, 096001 (2016)

    work page 2016

  28. [28]

    Eisert, M

    J. Eisert, M. Friesdorf, and C. Gogolin, Quantum many- body systems out of equilibrium, Nat. Phys.11, 124 (2015)

    work page 2015

  29. [29]

    Camacho, C

    G. Camacho, C. Kl¨ ockner, D. M. Kennes, and C. Karrasch, Review of recent developments of the functional renormalization group for systems out of equilibrium, The European Physical Journal B95, 10.1140/epjb/s10051-022-00445-3 (2022)

    work page doi:10.1140/epjb/s10051-022-00445-3 2022

  30. [30]

    Vasseur and J

    R. Vasseur and J. E. Moore, Nonequilibrium quantum dynamics and transport: from integrability to many- body localization, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: The- ory and Experiment2016, 064010 (2016)

    work page 2016

  31. [31]

    Bernard and B

    D. Bernard and B. Doyon, Conformal field theory out of equilibrium: a review, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2016, 064005 (2016)

    work page 2016

  32. [32]

    Foss-Feig, J

    M. Foss-Feig, J. T. Young, V. V. Albert, A. V. Gor- shkov, and M. F. Maghrebi, Solvable Family of Driven- Dissipative Many-Body Systems, Physical Review Let- ters119, 190402 (2017). 16

    work page 2017

  33. [33]

    D. A. Paz and M. F. Maghrebi, Driven-dissipative ising model: An exact field-theoretical analysis, Phys. Rev. A 104, 023713 (2021)

    work page 2021

  34. [34]

    Bartolo, F

    N. Bartolo, F. Minganti, W. Casteels, and C. Ciuti, Ex- act steady state of a Kerr resonator with one- and two- photon driving and dissipation: Controllable Wigner- function multimodality and dissipative phase transitions, Physical Review A94, 033841 (2016)

    work page 2016

  35. [35]

    Herring and C

    C. Herring and C. Kittel, On the Theory of Spin Waves in Ferromagnetic Media, Physical Review81, 869 (1951)

    work page 1951

  36. [36]

    Kubo, The Spin-Wave Theory as a Variational Method and Its Application to Antiferromagnetism, Re- views of Modern Physics25, 344 (1953)

    R. Kubo, The Spin-Wave Theory as a Variational Method and Its Application to Antiferromagnetism, Re- views of Modern Physics25, 344 (1953)

    work page 1953

  37. [37]

    Van Kranendonk and J

    J. Van Kranendonk and J. H. Van Vleck, Spin Waves, Rev. Mod. Phys.30, 1 (1958)

    work page 1958

  38. [38]

    F. Bloch, Zur Theorie des Austauschproblems und der Remanenzerscheinung der Ferromagnetika, inZur The- orie des Austauschproblems und der Remanenzerschein- ung der Ferromagnetika: Probleme des Atomkernbaues, edited by F. Bloch (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1932) pp. 295–335

    work page 1932

  39. [39]

    Holstein and H

    T. Holstein and H. Primakoff, Field Dependence of the Intrinsic Domain Magnetization of a Ferromagnet, Phys. Rev.58, 1098 (1940)

    work page 1940

  40. [40]

    R¨ uckriegel, A

    A. R¨ uckriegel, A. Kreisel, and P. Kopietz, Time- dependent spin-wave theory, Phys. Rev. B85, 054422 (2012)

    work page 2012

  41. [41]

    Lerose, B

    A. Lerose, B. ˇZunkoviˇ c, J. Marino, A. Gambassi, and A. Silva, Impact of nonequilibrium fluctuations on prethermal dynamical phase transitions in long-range in- teracting spin chains, Phys. Rev. B99, 045128 (2019)

    work page 2019

  42. [42]

    Seetharam, A

    K. Seetharam, A. Lerose, R. Fazio, and J. Marino, Dy- namical scaling of correlations generated by short- and long-range dissipation, Phys. Rev. B105, 184305 (2022)

    work page 2022

  43. [43]

    Defenu, A

    N. Defenu, A. Lerose, and S. Pappalardi, Out-of- equilibrium dynamics of quantum many-body systems with long-range interactions, Physics Reports Out-of- Equilibrium Dynamics of Quantum Many-Body Systems with Long-Range Interactions,1074, 1 (2024)

    work page 2024

  44. [44]

    Z. Li, A. Delmonte, X. Turkeshi, and R. Fazio, Moni- tored long-range interacting systems: Spin-wave theory for quantum trajectories, Nature Communications16, 4329 (2025)

    work page 2025

  45. [45]

    Verstraelen and M

    W. Verstraelen and M. Wouters, Gaussian quantum tra- jectories for the variational simulation of open quantum- optical systems, App. Sci.8, 1427 (2018)

    work page 2018

  46. [46]

    Delmonte, Z

    A. Delmonte, Z. Li, R. Fazio, and A. Romito, Measurement-induced phase transition in interacting bosons from most likely quantum trajectory, SciPost Physics20, 109 (2026)

    work page 2026

  47. [47]

    Note that with periodic boundary condi- tions, the distance is defined as∥r i −r j∥ ≡qP µ=x,y min(|rµ i −r µ j |, L− |r µ i −r µ j |)2

    work page

  48. [48]

    M. Kac, G. E. Uhlenbeck, and P. C. Hemmer, On the van der Waals Theory of the Vapor-Liquid Equilibrium. I. Discussion of a One-Dimensional Model, J. Math. Phys. 4, 216 (1963)

    work page 1963

  49. [49]

    J. Jin, A. Biella, O. Viyuela, C. Ciuti, R. Fazio, and D. Rossini, Phase diagram of the dissipative quantum Ising model on a square lattice, Physical Review B98, 241108 (2018)

    work page 2018

  50. [50]

    L. E. J. Brouwer, ¨Uber Abbildung von Mannig- faltigkeiten, Mathematische Annalen71, 97 (1912)

    work page 1912

  51. [51]

    Note that this condition can be more easily satisfied along trajectories than on the level of the average mixed state

    work page

  52. [52]

    K¨ onig and F

    J. K¨ onig and F. Hucht, Newton series expansion of bosonic operator functions, SciPost Physics10, 007 (2021)

    work page 2021

  53. [53]

    See Appendix B 2 b for technical details in implementing local quantum jumps, where this result requires further correction

    work page

  54. [54]

    Z. Li, A. Delmonte, and R. Fazio, Emergent determin- istic entanglement dynamics in monitored infinite-range bosonic systems, Physical Review B112, 104315 (2025)

    work page 2025

  55. [55]

    Minganti,Out-of-Equilibrium Phase Transitions in Nonlinear Optical Systems, Ph.D

    F. Minganti,Out-of-Equilibrium Phase Transitions in Nonlinear Optical Systems, Ph.D. thesis, Universit´ e Sor- bonne Paris Cit´ e (2018)

    work page 2018

  56. [56]

    Botet and R

    R. Botet and R. Jullien, Large-size critical behavior of in- finitely coordinated systems, Physical Review B28, 3955 (1983)

    work page 1983

  57. [57]

    Binder, M

    K. Binder, M. Nauenberg, V. Privman, and A. P. Young, Finite-size tests of hyperscaling, Physical Review B31, 1498 (1985)

    work page 1985

  58. [58]

    L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz,Statistical Physics(El- sevier Science, 1980)

    work page 1980

  59. [59]

    M. F. Maghrebi and A. V. Gorshkov, Nonequilibrium many-body steady states via Keldysh formalism, Physi- cal Review B93, 014307 (2016)

    work page 2016

  60. [60]

    Vicentini, A

    F. Vicentini, A. Biella, N. Regnault, and C. Ciuti, Varia- tional Neural-Network Ansatz for Steady States in Open Quantum Systems, Physical Review Letters122, 250503 (2019)

    work page 2019

  61. [61]

    D. Luo, Z. Chen, J. Carrasquilla, and B. K. Clark, Au- toregressive neural network for simulating open quantum systems via a probabilistic formulation, Physical Review Letters128, 10.1103/physrevlett.128.090501 (2022)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.128.090501 2022

  62. [62]

    Mellak, E

    J. Mellak, E. Arrigoni, and W. von der Linden, Deep neural networks as variational solutions for correlated open quantum systems, Communications Physics7, 10.1038/s42005-024-01757-9 (2024)

    work page doi:10.1038/s42005-024-01757-9 2024

  63. [63]

    Vogel and H

    K. Vogel and H. Risken, Quasiprobability distributions in dispersive optical bistability, Phys. Rev. A39, 4675 (1989)

    work page 1989

  64. [64]

    Delmonte, Z

    A. Delmonte, Z. Li, G. Passarelli, E. Y. Song, D. Bar- berena, A. M. Rey, and R. Fazio, Measurement-induced phase transitions in monitored infinite-range interacting systems, Physical Review Research7, 023082 (2025)

    work page 2025

  65. [65]

    Tosca, F

    J. Tosca, F. Carnazza, L. Giacomelli, and C. Ciuti, Efficient Variational Dynamics of Open Quantum Bosonic Systems via Automatic Differentiation (2025), arXiv:2507.14076

    work page arXiv 2025

  66. [66]

    Tosca, Z

    J. Tosca, Z. Li, F. Carnazza, and C. Ciuti, Variational Dynamics of Open Quantum Spin Systems in Phase Space (2026), arXiv:2604.01165

    work page arXiv 2026