pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.23945 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-27 · ⚛️ physics.bio-ph

An in situ self-adaptive hydrogel coating enables seamless neural interfaces via okra mucilage polysaccharide and {α}-helical peptide amphiphiles co-assembly

Tenglong Luo , Yiqing Guo , Shanshan Su , Qiaoyu Yang , Wen Deng , Zhangfeng Huang , Zhiquan Yu , Dawen Yu
show 5 more authors
Yubin Ke Hua Yang Jiecong Wang Dewen Zhang Yuanhao Wu
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 17:28 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.bio-ph
keywords okra mucilagehydrogel coatingneural interfacessupramolecular assemblyforeign body responseglial scarringpeptide amphiphilesin situ coating
0
0 comments X

The pith

A hydrogel from okra polysaccharide and helical peptides coats electrodes in place to reduce brain inflammation and stabilize recordings.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper sets out to demonstrate that co-assembling a natural plant polysaccharide from okra with synthetic peptide molecules produces a soft hydrogel that can be formed directly onto electrode surfaces inside tissue. This material changes its internal fibre arrangement when exposed to normal body pH or electrical activity, gaining better tissue adhesion and signal-carrying ability without any added metals or particles that could irritate cells. If the approach succeeds, neural implants could avoid the chronic swelling and scar tissue that currently cause most long-term devices to lose function after weeks or months. Readers would care because stable brain recordings are needed for treating paralysis, epilepsy, and other neurological conditions, yet existing interfaces often fail due to mechanical mismatch and immune reactions.

Core claim

The supramolecular co-assembly of okra mucilage polysaccharide and α-helical peptide amphiphiles produces an OP gel that undergoes interfacial liquid-liquid phase separation to form an ultra-thin coating on carbon fibre electrodes; physiological pH and electrical stimulation then trigger rearrangements in fibre architecture that increase bioadhesion and charge transport, resulting in markedly lower foreign-body responses and glial scarring that permit stable, high-quality neural recordings in a mouse cortical implant model.

What carries the argument

Supramolecular co-assembly of okra mucilage polysaccharide and α-helical peptide amphiphiles into a stimulus-responsive hydrogel whose fibre orientation changes with pH and electrical input.

Load-bearing premise

The fibre rearrangements and functional improvements seen in test tubes will occur inside living brain tissue without causing toxicity, coating detachment, or interference with electrode performance.

What would settle it

No measurable reduction in glial scar thickness or improvement in long-term recording stability when OP-gel-coated electrodes are compared with uncoated controls after several weeks in the mouse cortical model.

read the original abstract

Long-term stability of neural interfaces is frequently compromised by mechanical mismatch and chronic neuroinflammation, often leading to electrode detachment and signal failure. While hydrogel coatings offer a solution, conventional designs typically rely on exogenous conductive fillers that can sacrifice mechanical flexibility or induce toxicity. Here, we report on a soft neural interface based on the supramolecular co-assembly of a renewable natural polysaccharide, okra mucilage polysaccharide (OMP), and an {\alpha}-helical peptide amphiphiles (APA). The resulting OMP-APA hydrogel (OP gel) exhibits environment-responsive enhancements in bioadhesion and charge-transport capability triggered by physiological pH and electrical stimulation. These properties arise from intrinsic, stimulus-responsive alterations in fibre architecture and orientation, eliminating the need for conductive fillers. Leveraging interfacial liquid-liquid phase separation, we demonstrate the in situ coating of ultra-thin OP-gel coating onto carbon fibre electrodes (CFE). The OP-gel-coated electrodes (OP-CFE) significantly mitigate foreign body responses and glial scarring, enabling stable, high-quality neural recordings in a mouse cortical in vivo model. Our findings provide a versatile strategy for constructing seamless, multifunctional bio-interfaces through supramolecular co-assembly, with broad implications for advancing neural prosthetics and neuroscience research.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a supramolecular co-assembly of okra mucilage polysaccharide (OMP) and α-helical peptide amphiphiles (APA) forming an OP gel that is applied in situ as a thin coating on carbon fiber electrodes (CFE) via interfacial liquid-liquid phase separation. The gel is claimed to exhibit pH- and electrically-triggered changes in fiber architecture and orientation that enhance bioadhesion and charge transport without exogenous fillers. In a mouse cortical implantation model, OP-CFE electrodes are reported to reduce foreign-body responses and glial scarring while enabling stable, high-quality neural recordings.

Significance. If the stimulus-responsive mechanism is shown to operate in vivo, the work would provide a filler-free, renewable-material route to mechanically compliant neural interfaces that avoids toxicity risks associated with conductive additives. The in-situ coating strategy and use of natural polysaccharide-peptide co-assembly represent a potentially scalable approach with implications for long-term neural prosthetics.

major comments (1)
  1. [In vivo experiments and results] The central claim that stimulus-responsive fiber reorientation and network changes mitigate foreign body responses rests on the in vivo performance of OP-CFE. However, the in vivo histology and electrophysiology results provide no post-implantation SEM, polarized microscopy, cryo-EM, or spectroscopic evidence confirming that fiber architecture or orientation actually changed after implantation or during stimulation. Without this link, the observed reduction in glial scarring and improved recording stability cannot be attributed specifically to the adaptive supramolecular mechanism rather than passive mechanical or surface properties of any soft hydrogel coating.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract asserts significant mitigation of foreign body responses and stable recordings but supplies no quantitative metrics, error bars, sample sizes, or statistical tests; these should be added to allow readers to evaluate the strength of the in vivo claims.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and insightful comments on our manuscript. We have carefully reviewed the major concern regarding the in vivo evidence for the stimulus-responsive mechanism and provide a detailed response below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [In vivo experiments and results] The central claim that stimulus-responsive fiber reorientation and network changes mitigate foreign body responses rests on the in vivo performance of OP-CFE. However, the in vivo histology and electrophysiology results provide no post-implantation SEM, polarized microscopy, cryo-EM, or spectroscopic evidence confirming that fiber architecture or orientation actually changed after implantation or during stimulation. Without this link, the observed reduction in glial scarring and improved recording stability cannot be attributed specifically to the adaptive supramolecular mechanism rather than passive mechanical or surface properties of any soft hydrogel coating.

    Authors: We acknowledge the referee's point that direct post-implantation structural characterization would provide the most definitive causal link between the adaptive supramolecular changes and the observed in vivo benefits. Our manuscript presents extensive in vitro data (SEM, polarized microscopy, and spectroscopic analyses) demonstrating pH- and electrically-triggered fiber reorientation and network reorganization in the OP gel. The in vivo results show that OP-CFE electrodes significantly outperform bare CFEs in reducing glial scarring and maintaining stable recordings. While the paper does not include post-implantation imaging of the coating's internal architecture (due to the technical challenges of imaging the thin, in situ-formed layer within brain tissue), we will revise the manuscript to: (1) add a dedicated limitations paragraph explicitly discussing the absence of direct in vivo structural confirmation and the possibility of contributions from passive hydrogel properties; (2) strengthen the comparison to any available non-responsive hydrogel controls or literature benchmarks to better isolate the role of the stimulus-responsive features; and (3) clarify that the attribution to the adaptive mechanism is supported by the combination of in vitro mechanistic data and differential in vivo performance rather than by direct in vivo imaging alone. These textual revisions will temper the mechanistic claims accordingly. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely experimental claims with no derivations or self-referential predictions

full rationale

The manuscript describes synthesis of an OMP-APA hydrogel, its in-vitro stimulus-responsive fiber changes, in-situ coating onto electrodes, and in-vivo recording/histology outcomes. No equations, fitted parameters, model predictions, or derivation chains appear in the provided text. Central claims rest on direct experimental measurements and animal data rather than any step that reduces to its own inputs by construction. Self-citations, if present, are not load-bearing for any mathematical result. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained and non-circular.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available; no explicit free parameters, mathematical axioms, or newly postulated entities are stated. The work relies on standard experimental assumptions about material biocompatibility and in vivo translation that are not detailed here.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5570 in / 1083 out tokens · 62560 ms · 2026-05-07T17:28:18.229169+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references · 81 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    & Anikeeva, P

    Frank, J.A., Antonini, M.J. & Anikeeva, P. Next -generation interfaces for studying neural function. Nat Biotechnol 37, 1013–1023 (2019)

    work page 2019

  2. [2]

    & Nicolelis, M.A

    Lebedev, M.A. & Nicolelis, M.A. Brain -Machine Interfaces: From Basic Science to Neuroprostheses and Neurorehabilitation. Physiol Rev 97, 767–837 (2017)

    work page 2017

  3. [3]

    & Brown, P

    Cagnan, H., Denison, T., McIntyre, C. & Brown, P. Emerging technologies for improved deep brain stimulation. Nat Biotechnol 37, 1024–1033 (2019)

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    & Shenoy, K.V

    Santhanam, G., Ryu, S.I., Y u, B.M., Afshar, A. & Shenoy, K.V . A high-performance brain- computer interface. Nature 442, 195–198 (2006)

    work page 2006

  5. [5]

    Yang, X. et al. Kirigami electronics for long -term electrophysiological recording of human neural organoids and assembloids. Nat Biotechnol 42, 1836–1843 (2024)

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    Sui, Y . et al. Deep brain-machine interfaces: sensing and modulating the human deep brain. Natl Sci Rev 9, nwac212 (2022)

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    Apollo, N.V . et al. Gels, jets, mosquitoes, and magnets: a review of implantation strategies for soft neural probes. J Neural Eng 17, 041002 (2020)

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    Zhang, E.N. et al. Mechanically matched silicone brain implants reduce brain foreign body response. Advanced Materials Technologies 6, 2000909 (2021)

    work page 2021

  9. [9]

    Karumbaiah, L. et al. The upregulation of specific interleukin (IL) receptor antagonists and paradoxical enhancement of neuronal apoptosis due to electrode induced strain and brain micromotion. Biomaterials 33, 5983–5996 (2012)

    work page 2012

  10. [10]

    & Vitale, F

    Boufidis, D., Garg, R., Angelopoulos, E., Cullen, D.K. & Vitale, F. Bio -inspired electronics: Soft, biohybrid, and "living" neural interfaces. Nat Commun 16, 1861 (2025)

    work page 2025

  11. [11]

    Chen, D. et al. An Ultra -Flexible Neural Electrode with Bioelectromechanical Compatibility and Brain Micromotion Detection. Adv Healthc Mater, e03101 (2025)

    work page 2025

  12. [12]

    & Purcell, E.K

    Salatino, J.W., Ludwig, K.A., Kozai, T.D.Y . & Purcell, E.K. Glial responses to implanted electrodes in the brain. Nat Biomed Eng 1, 862–877 (2017)

    work page 2017

  13. [13]

    Trotier, A. et al. Micromotion Derived Fluid Shear Stress Mediates Peri -Electrode Gliosis through Mechanosensitive Ion Channels. Adv Sci (Weinh) 10, e2301352 (2023)

    work page 2023

  14. [14]

    & Reichert, W.M

    Polikov, V .S., Block, M.L., Fellous, J.M., Hong, J.S. & Reichert, W.M. In vitro model of glial scarring around neuroelectrodes chronically implanted in the CNS. Biomaterials 27, 5368–5376 (2006)

    work page 2006

  15. [15]

    Wang, L. et al. Bioaugmented design and functional evaluation of low damage implantable array electrodes. Bioact Mater 47, 18–31 (2025)

    work page 2025

  16. [16]

    & Maharbiz, M.M

    Shen, K., Chen, O., Edmunds, J.L., Piech, D.K. & Maharbiz, M.M. Translational opportunities and challenges of invasive electrodes for neural interfaces. Nat Biomed Eng 7, 424–442 (2023)

    work page 2023

  17. [17]

    Tian, G. et al. Electrostatic Interaction -Based High Tissue Adhesive, Stretchable Microelectrode Arrays for the Electrophysiological Interface. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 14, 4852– 4861 (2022)

    work page 2022

  18. [18]

    Lao, J. et al. Intrinsically Adhesive and Conductive Hydrogel Bridging the Bioelectronic - Tissue Interface for Biopotentials Recording. ACS Nano 19, 7755–7766 (2025)

    work page 2025

  19. [19]

    Perez-Chirinos, L. et al. Tuning the Dimensionality of Protein-Peptide Coassemblies to Build 2D Conductive Nanomaterials. ACS Nano 19, 16500–16516 (2025)

    work page 2025

  20. [20]

    Wang, L. et al. Tough and Functional Hydrogel Coating by Electrostatic Spraying. Small, e2408780 (2024)

    work page 2024

  21. [21]

    Liang, Q. et al. Electron Conductive and Transparent Hydrogels for Recording Brain Neural Signals and Neuromodulation. Adv Mater 35, e2211159 (2023)

    work page 2023

  22. [22]

    Zhang, J. et al. Engineering Electrodes with Robust Conducting Hydrogel Coating for Neural Recording and Modulation. Adv Mater 35, e2209324 (2023)

    work page 2023

  23. [23]

    & Zhang, Q

    Khan, W.U., Shen, Z., Mugo, S.M., Wang, H. & Zhang, Q. Implantable hydrogels as pioneering materials for next-generation brain-computer interfaces. Chem Soc Rev 54, 2832–2880 (2025)

    work page 2025

  24. [24]

    Xue, X.Y . et al. Conductive Hydrogel‐Based Neural Interfaces: From Fabrication Methods, Properties, to Applications. Small Structures, 2400696 (2025)

    work page 2025

  25. [25]

    Zhang, P. et al. Conducting Hydrogel‐Based Neural Biointerfacing Technologies. Advanced Functional Materials, 2422869 (2025)

    work page 2025

  26. [26]

    Lv, S. et al. Long-term stability strategies of deep brain flexible neural interface. NPJ Flexible Electronics 9, 40 (2025)

    work page 2025

  27. [27]

    Chu, T. et al. Highly Conductive, Adhesive and Biocompatible Hydrogel for Closed -Loop Neuromodulation in Nerve Regeneration. ACS Nano 19, 18729–18746 (2025)

    work page 2025

  28. [28]

    & Ma, M.-G

    Guo, W.-Y . & Ma, M.-G. Conductive nanocomposite hydrogels for flexible wearable sensors. Journal of Materials Chemistry A 12, 9371–9399 (2024)

    work page 2024

  29. [29]

    & Liu, X

    Chen, J., Liu, F., Abdiryim, T. & Liu, X. An overview of conductive composite hydrogels for flexible electronic devices. Advanced Composites and Hybrid Materials 7, 35 (2024)

    work page 2024

  30. [30]

    Zhou, T. et al. 3D printable high -performance conducting polymer hydrogel for all -hydrogel bioelectronic interfaces. Nat Mater 22, 895–902 (2023)

    work page 2023

  31. [31]

    Vashist, A. et al. Advances in Carbon Nanotubes -Hydrogel Hybrids in Nanomedicine for Therapeutics. Adv Healthc Mater 7, e1701213 (2018)

    work page 2018

  32. [32]

    & Flahaut, E

    Kougkolos, G., Golzio, M., Laudebat, L., Valdez -Nava, Z. & Flahaut, E. Hydrogels with electrically conductive nanomaterials for biomedical applications. J Mater Chem B 11, 2036–2062 (2023)

    work page 2036

  33. [33]

    & Wan, P

    Zhang, Y ., Gong, M. & Wan, P. MXene hydrogel for wearable electronics. Matter 4, 2655– 2658 (2021)

    work page 2021

  34. [34]

    Won, D. et al. Digital selective transformation and patterning of highly conductive hydrogel bioelectronics by laser-induced phase separation. Sci Adv 8, eabo3209 (2022)

    work page 2022

  35. [35]

    Wang, J. et al. Ultra-High Electrical Conductivity in Filler-Free Polymeric Hydrogels Toward Thermoelectrics and Electromagnetic Interference Shielding. Adv Mater 34, e2109904 (2022)

    work page 2022

  36. [36]

    & Stupp, S.I

    Capito, R.M., Azevedo, H.S., Velichko, Y .S., Mata, A. & Stupp, S.I. Self-assembly of large and small molecules into hierarchically ordered sacs and membranes. Science 319, 1812–1816 (2008)

    work page 2008

  37. [37]

    Wu, Y . et al. Disordered protein -graphene oxide co -assembly and supramolecular biofabrication of functional fluidic devices. Nat Commun 11, 1182 (2020)

    work page 2020

  38. [38]

    & Cui, H

    Wang, H., Mills, J., Sun, B. & Cui, H. Therapeutic Supramolecular Polymers: Designs and Applications. Prog Polym Sci 148 (2024)

    work page 2024

  39. [39]

    Finkelstein-Zuta, G. et al. A self -healing multispectral transparent adhesive peptide glass. Nature 630, 368–374 (2024)

    work page 2024

  40. [40]

    Nam, J. et al. Supramolecular Peptide Hydrogel-Based Soft Neural Interface Augments Brain Signals through a Three-Dimensional Electrical Network. ACS Nano 14, 664–675 (2020)

    work page 2020

  41. [41]

    Jain, D. et al. Low -Molecular-Weight Hydrogels as New Supramolecular Materials for Bioelectrochemical Interfaces. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9, 1093–1098 (2017)

    work page 2017

  42. [42]

    Xu, H. et al. An investigation of the conductivity of peptide nanotube networks prepared by enzyme-triggered self-assembly. Nanoscale 2, 960–966 (2010)

    work page 2010

  43. [43]

    & Stupp, S.I

    Tovar, J.D., Rabatic, B.M. & Stupp, S.I. Conducting polymers confined within bioactive peptide amphiphile nanostructures. Small 3, 2024–2028 (2007)

    work page 2024

  44. [44]

    & Stupp, S.I

    Arnold, M.S., Guler, M.O., Hersam, M.C. & Stupp, S.I. Encapsulation of carbon nanotubes by self-assembling peptide amphiphiles. Langmuir 21, 4705–4709 (2005)

    work page 2005

  45. [45]

    Okesola, B.O. et al. Covalent co -assembly between resilin -like polypeptide and peptide amphiphile into hydrogels with controlled nanostructure and improved mechanical properties. Biomater Sci 8, 846–857 (2020)

    work page 2020

  46. [46]

    Wu, Y . et al. Co-assembling living material as an in vitro lung epithelial infection model. Matter 7, 216–236 (2024)

    work page 2024

  47. [47]

    Wu, Y . et al. Disinfector‐assisted low temperature reduced graphene oxide‐protein surgical dressing for the postoperative photothermal treatment of melanoma. Advanced Functional Materials 32, 2205802 (2022)

    work page 2022

  48. [48]

    Su, S. et al. De novo design of alpha-helical peptide amphiphiles repairing fragmented collagen type I via supramolecular co-assembly. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.14577 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  49. [49]

    Agregán, R. et al. Biological activity and development of functional foods fortified with okra (Abelmoschus esculentus). Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 63, 6018–6033 (2023)

    work page 2023

  50. [50]

    & Tu, Z.C

    Zhu, X.M., Xu, R., Wang, H., Chen, J.Y . & Tu, Z.C. Structural Properties, Bioactivities, and Applications of Polysaccharides from Okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench]: A Review. J Agric Food Chem (2020)

    work page 2020

  51. [51]

    Xu, Y ., Cao, H. & He, J. Research advances in okra polysaccharides: Green extraction technology, structural features, bioactivity, processing properties and application in foods. Food Res Int 202, 115686 (2025)

    work page 2025

  52. [52]

    & Wang, J

    Liu, Y ., Ye, Y ., Hu, X. & Wang, J. Structural characterization and anti-inflammatory activity of a polysaccharide from the lignified okra. Carbohydr Polym 265, 118081 (2021)

    work page 2021

  53. [53]

    & Yan, J.K

    Wang, C., Yu, Y .B., Chen, T.T., Wang, Z.W. & Yan, J.K. Innovative preparation, physicochemical characteristics and functional properties of bioactive polysaccharides from fresh okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench). Food Chem 320, 126647 (2020)

    work page 2020

  54. [54]

    & Brar, V

    Kaur, G., Singh, D. & Brar, V . Bioadhesive okra polymer based buccal patches as platform for controlled drug delivery. Int J Biol Macromol 70, 408–419 (2014)

    work page 2014

  55. [55]

    Nie, X.R. et al. Structural characteristics, rheological properties, and biological activities of polysaccharides from different cultivars of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) collected in China. Int J Biol Macromol 139, 459–467 (2019)

    work page 2019

  56. [56]

    & Gorb, S.N

    Gorges, H., Kovalev, A. & Gorb, S.N. Structure, mechanical and adhesive properties of the cellulosic mucilage in Ocimum basilicum seeds. Acta Biomater 184, 286–295 (2024)

    work page 2024

  57. [57]

    rigid-flexible

    Zhao, Z., Dong, Z., Chen, C., Peng, J. & Ma, P. Synergistically improving interface behavior by designing physical twisting structure and “rigid-flexible” interface layer on ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) fiber surface. Thin-Walled Structures 199, 111805 (2024)

    work page 2024

  58. [58]

    & Datla, N.V

    Chanda, A., Sinha, S.K. & Datla, N.V . Electrical conductivity of random and aligned nanocomposites: Theoretical models and experimental validation. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing 149, 106543 (2021)

    work page 2021

  59. [59]

    Won, C. et al. Emerging fiber-based neural interfaces with conductive composites. Mater Horiz 12, 4545–4572 (2025)

    work page 2025

  60. [60]

    Chen, Y . et al. Helical peptide structure improves conductivity and stability of solid electrolytes. Nat Mater 23, 1539–1546 (2024)

    work page 2024

  61. [61]

    & Hochbaum, A.I

    Ing, N.L., Spencer, R.K., Luong, S.H., Nguyen, H.D. & Hochbaum, A.I. Electronic Conductivity in Biomimetic α-Helical Peptide Nanofibers and Gels. ACS Nano 12, 2652 –2661 (2018)

    work page 2018

  62. [62]

    Grosvirt-Dramen, A. et al. Hierarchical Assembly of Conductive Fibers from Coiled -Coil Peptide Building Blocks. ACS Nano 19, 10162–10172 (2025)

    work page 2025

  63. [63]

    Zhang, Z. et al. Supramolecular Structure Enabled Photo -Responsive Charge Transport in Porphyrin-Based Junctions. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 64, e202508443 (2025)

    work page 2025

  64. [64]

    & Gramlich, W.M

    Kelly, P.V ., Gardner, D.J. & Gramlich, W.M. Optimizing lignocellulosic nanofibril dimensions and morphology by mechanical refining for enhanced adhesion. Carbohydr Polym 273, 118566 (2021)

    work page 2021

  65. [65]

    Fu, H. et al. Supramolecular polymers form tactoids through liquid -liquid phase separation. Nature 626, 1011–1018 (2024)

    work page 2024

  66. [66]

    Inostroza-Brito, K.E. et al. Co-assembly, spatiotemporal control and morphogenesis of a hybrid protein–peptide system. Nature Chemistry 7, 897–904 (2015)

    work page 2015

  67. [67]

    Zheng, R. et al. Assembly of short amphiphilic peptoids into nanohelices with controllable supramolecular chirality. Nat Commun 15, 3264 (2024). 68.Hu, X. et al. Neutron reflection and scattering in characterising peptide assemblies. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 322, 103033 (2023)

    work page 2024

  68. [68]

    Lu, Y .B. et al. Viscoelastic properties of individual glial cells and neurons in the CNS. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103, 17759–17764 (2006)

    work page 2006

  69. [69]

    Denk, J. et al. Synergistic enhancement of thermomechanical properties and oxidation resistance in aligned Co -continuous carbon -ceramic hybrid fibers. Mater Horiz 11, 5777 –5785 (2024)

    work page 2024

  70. [70]

    & Zhang, P

    Xu, J., Zhu, X., Zhao, J., Ling, G. & Zhang, P. Biomedical applications of supramolecular hydrogels with enhanced mechanical properties. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 321, 103000 (2023)

    work page 2023

  71. [71]

    Regulation and modulation of pH in the brain

    Chesler, M. Regulation and modulation of pH in the brain. Physiological reviews 83, 1183– 1221 (2003)

    work page 2003

  72. [72]

    & Huang, W

    Zheng, H., Zhang, Z., Cai, S., An, Z. & Huang, W. Enhancing Purely Organic Room Temperature Phosphorescence via Supramolecular Self-Assembly. Adv Mater 36, e2311922 (2024)

    work page 2024

  73. [73]

    & Park, S

    Lam, C.D. & Park, S. Nanomechanical characterization of soft nanomaterial using atomic force microscopy. Mater Today Bio 31, 101506 (2025)

    work page 2025

  74. [74]

    Li, F. et al. Low -intensity pulsed ultrasound stimulation (LIPUS) modulates microglial activation following intracortical microelectrode implantation. Nat Commun 15, 5512 (2024)

    work page 2024

  75. [75]

    & Richter, C.P

    Villa, J., Cury, J., Kessler, L., Tan, X. & Richter, C.P. Enhancing biocompatibility of the brain- machine interface: A review. Bioact Mater 42, 531–549 (2024)

    work page 2024

  76. [76]

    Chen, F. et al. Visualization of electrochemical reactions on microelectrodes using light - addressable potentiometric sensor imaging. Anal Chim Acta 1224, 340237 (2022)

    work page 2022

  77. [77]

    Wang, S. et al. 3D culture of neural stem cells within conductive PEDOT layer -assembled chitosan/gelatin scaffolds for neural tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 93, 890– 901 (2018)

    work page 2018

  78. [78]

    & Shakeri, R

    Hallaj, R., Ghafary, Z., Kamal Mohammed, O. & Shakeri, R. Induced ultrasensitive electrochemical biosensor for target MDA -MB-231 cell cytoplasmic protein detection based on RNA-cleavage DNAzyme catalytic reaction. Biosens Bioelectron 227, 115168 (2023)

    work page 2023

  79. [79]

    Wei, M. et al. How to Choose a Proper Theoretical Analysis Model Based on Cell Adhesion and Nonadhesion Impedance Measurement. ACS Sens 6, 673–687 (2021)

    work page 2021

  80. [80]

    & Stupp, S.I

    Mata, A., Palmer, L., Tejeda -Montes, E. & Stupp, S.I. in Nanotechnology in Regenerative Medicine: Methods and Protocols 39–49 (Springer, 2011)

    work page 2011

Showing first 80 references.