pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.26914 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-29 · 🪐 quant-ph

Digital Simulation of Non-Hermitian Knotted Bands on Quantum Hardware

Truman Yu Ng , Yuzhu Wang , Wei Jie Chan , Ruizhe Shen , Tianqi Chen , Ching Hua Lee This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 11:13 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords non-Hermitian topologyknotted bandsquantum simulationbraid invariantsknot polynomialssuperconducting quantum processorspectral topologytwister models
0
0 comments X

The pith

Non-Hermitian knotted bands are simulated on quantum hardware by mapping eigenstate windings to braid topology.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper establishes a method to simulate and characterize multi-band non-Hermitian systems with knotted structures using programmable quantum processors. It introduces twister models and a non-variational protocol that uses eigenstate winding measurements to extract braid words and knot invariants. This approach avoids full tomography and optimization steps that are difficult on current hardware. If successful, it provides a practical route for studying exotic non-Hermitian topologies on near-term devices. The experimental reconstruction of knots like the Hopf chain demonstrates the method's capability.

Core claim

We introduce a family of non-Hermitian multi-band twister models and implement a non-variational protocol on a superconducting quantum processor to characterize their complex braided band structures. By mapping the winding of eigenstates to the spectral topology, the protocol extracts braid information including braid words and knot invariants such as the Alexander and Jones polynomials without full spectral tomography or repeated optimization. We experimentally reconstruct complicated knots and links such as the Hopf chain and Solomon's knot.

What carries the argument

The mapping from eigenstate winding to spectral topology in non-Hermitian multi-band twister models, which enables extraction of braid words and knot invariants from quantum measurements.

Load-bearing premise

The winding of eigenstates in these models accurately reflects the spectral topology and braid information even in the presence of noise on the quantum hardware.

What would settle it

Running the protocol on the quantum processor for the Solomon's knot and finding that the extracted Jones polynomial does not match the expected mathematical value for that knot.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.26914 by Ching Hua Lee, Ruizhe Shen, Tianqi Chen, Truman Yu Ng, Wei Jie Chan, Yuzhu Wang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: ), all eight inequivalent knots/links shown can be distinctly identified view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8 view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: illustrates how the k-independent winding number Wij can be determined without performing an explicit integration by leveraging the geometric interpretation introduced above. Consider the leftmost column as an example: the phase traced by the vector Ei(k)−Ej (k) initially increases, subsequently decreases, and ultimately returns to zero. Here, we treat complex numbers in C and their corresponding two-dimen… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10 view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11 view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Knots and links represent a fundamental motif of non-local connectivity that permeates the physical sciences from string theory to protein folds. While spectral braiding has been explored in two-band non-Hermitian models across various platforms, its direct simulation and characterization on programmable quantum hardware, particularly beyond two strands, remains a formidable challenge due to the limitations of variational optimization in these systems. Here, we introduce a family of non-Hermitian multi-band twister models and implement a non-variational protocol to characterize their complex braided band structures on a programmable superconducting quantum processor. By mapping the winding of eigenstates to the spectral topology, we devise an efficient measurement strategy that extracts braid information, including braid words and knot invariants like the Alexander and Jones polynomials, without requiring full spectral tomography or repeated optimization. We experimentally demonstrate the reconstruction of complicated knots and links such as the Hopf chain and Solomon's knot. Our approach provides a general framework for investigating exotic non-Hermitian topology on near-term quantum devices, opening a route to simulate more sophisticated topological structures in knot theory.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper introduces a family of non-Hermitian multi-band twister models and a non-variational protocol to simulate their complex braided band structures on a programmable superconducting quantum processor. By mapping the winding of eigenstates to spectral topology, the protocol extracts braid words and knot invariants (Alexander and Jones polynomials) without full tomography or optimization, and the authors report an experimental demonstration of reconstructing structures such as the Hopf chain and Solomon's knot.

Significance. If the winding-to-topology mapping remains faithful under realistic device noise for multi-band systems, the work supplies a general, scalable framework for hardware simulation of non-Hermitian knotted topology that extends beyond two-band models and avoids variational methods, thereby opening routes to study more intricate topological structures in knot theory on near-term quantum devices.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central experimental claim that the protocol reconstructs the Hopf chain and Solomon's knot is presented without quantitative fidelity metrics, error bars on extracted invariants, or explicit checks that finite-shot winding measurements preserve the braid word under typical superconducting-device noise (decoherence, readout errors, imperfect non-Hermitian dilation).
  2. [Protocol description] The non-variational mapping from measured eigenstate windings to braid words and invariants is asserted to be accurate for multi-band twister models, yet the manuscript supplies no noise-robustness analysis or comparison against full tomography that would confirm the mapping does not shift topology on noisy hardware.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Model definition] Notation for the multi-band twister models and the precise definition of the winding extraction procedure could be clarified with an explicit algorithmic pseudocode or flowchart to aid reproducibility.
  2. [Abstract and Introduction] The abstract and introduction would benefit from a brief statement of the number of qubits, circuit depth, and shot counts used in the hardware runs.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments. We address each major point below and have revised the manuscript to strengthen the presentation of the experimental results and protocol validation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central experimental claim that the protocol reconstructs the Hopf chain and Solomon's knot is presented without quantitative fidelity metrics, error bars on extracted invariants, or explicit checks that finite-shot winding measurements preserve the braid word under typical superconducting-device noise (decoherence, readout errors, imperfect non-Hermitian dilation).

    Authors: We agree that the abstract would benefit from these quantitative details. The original version was kept concise, but we have revised the abstract to report fidelity metrics for the reconstructed invariants along with error bars obtained from finite-shot statistics. We have also added explicit discussion and supporting numerical checks in the main text and supplementary material confirming that the braid word is preserved under realistic levels of decoherence, readout errors, and imperfect dilation for the device parameters employed. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Protocol description] The non-variational mapping from measured eigenstate windings to braid words and invariants is asserted to be accurate for multi-band twister models, yet the manuscript supplies no noise-robustness analysis or comparison against full tomography that would confirm the mapping does not shift topology on noisy hardware.

    Authors: The referee correctly notes the absence of a dedicated robustness study in the initial submission. While the mapping is derived exactly in the ideal case, we have now added a direct comparison of the protocol outputs against full state tomography on both simulated and experimental data, showing agreement within statistical uncertainties. We have further included noise-robustness analysis in the revised methods and supplementary sections using realistic superconducting-device noise models, which demonstrates that the extracted braid words and knot invariants remain topologically stable. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental extraction of braid invariants from measured eigenstate windings is self-contained

full rationale

The paper introduces non-Hermitian multi-band twister models and a non-variational protocol that maps measured eigenstate windings directly to spectral topology on quantum hardware. Braid words and knot invariants (Alexander/Jones polynomials) are extracted from finite-shot measurements without optimization or full tomography, and the reported reconstructions of structures such as the Hopf chain and Solomon's knot are presented as direct experimental outcomes. No derivation step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, self-citation chain, or definitional equivalence; the central mapping is a newly devised measurement strategy whose validity is tested against hardware data rather than assumed tautologically. The work is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the newly postulated multi-band twister models and the validity of the eigenstate-winding-to-spectral-topology mapping; these are introduced without independent external benchmarks in the provided abstract.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Standard non-Hermitian Hamiltonian formalism and eigenstate topology
    The models rely on complex eigenvalues and eigenstate winding numbers as in prior non-Hermitian topology literature.
invented entities (1)
  • non-Hermitian multi-band twister models no independent evidence
    purpose: To generate controllable knotted and linked band structures beyond two bands
    Introduced in the paper as the core modeling framework for the simulation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5495 in / 1336 out tokens · 78900 ms · 2026-05-07T11:13:11.930670+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Fibonacci many-body scars in a decorated Rule-54 quantum cellular automaton

    quant-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Exact Fibonacci many-body scars engineered via soliton skeleton and invisible decorations in Rule-54 QCA, with finite translation orbits producing low-entanglement Floquet states.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

151 extracted references · 151 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    K. Wang, J. L. K. König, K. Yang, L. Xiao, W. Yi, E. J. Bergholtz, and P. Xue, Observation of braid- protected unpaired exceptional points, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 056602 (2026)

    work page 2026

  2. [2]

    S. H. Simon,Topological Quantum(Oxford University Press, 2023)

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    Kitaev, Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons, Ann

    A. Kitaev, Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons, Ann. Phys. (N. Y).303, 2 (2003)

    work page 2003

  4. [4]

    Nayak, S

    C. Nayak, S. H. Simon, A. Stern, M. Freedman, and S. Das Sarma, Non-Abelian anyons and topologi- cal quantum computation, Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 1083 (2008)

    work page 2008

  5. [5]

    T. I. Andersenet al., Non-Abelian braiding of graph vertices in a superconducting processor, Nature618, 264 (2023)

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    Z. K. Minev, K. Najafi, S. Majumder, J. Wang, A. Stern, E.-A. Kim, C.-M. Jian, and G. Zhu, Realiz- ing string-net condensation: Fibonacci anyon braiding for universal gates and sampling chromatic polynomials, Nat. Commun.16, 6225 (2025)

    work page 2025

  7. [7]

    Iqbal, N

    M. Iqbal, N. Tantivasadakarn, R. Verresen, S. L. Camp- bell, J. M. Dreiling, C. Figgatt, J. P. Gaebler, J. Jo- hansen, M. Mills, S. A. Moses, J. M. Pino, A. Rans- ford, M. Rowe, P. Siegfried, R. P. Stutz, M. Foss-Feig, A. Vishwanath, and H. Dreyer, Non-Abelian topologi- cal order and anyons on a trapped-ion processor, Nature 626, 505 (2024)

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Xu, Z.-Z

    S. Xu, Z.-Z. Sun, K. Wang, H. Li, Z. Zhu, H. Dong, J. Deng, X. Zhang, J. Chen, Y. Wu, C. Zhang, F. Jin, X. Zhu, Y. Gao, A. Zhang, N. Wang, Y. Zou, Z. Tan, F. Shen, J. Zhong, Z. Bao, W. Li, W. Jiang, L.-W. Yu, Z. Song, P. Zhang, L. Xiang, Q. Guo, Z. Wang, C. Song, H. Wang, and D.-L. Deng, Non-Abelian braiding of Fi- bonacci anyons with a superconducting pr...

    work page 2024

  9. [9]

    W. D. Heiss, The physics of exceptional points, J. Phys. A Math. Theor.45, 444016 (2012)

    work page 2012

  10. [10]

    Dembowski, H.-D

    C. Dembowski, H.-D. Gräf, H. L. Harney, A. Heine, W. D. Heiss, H. Rehfeld, and A. Richter, Experimental 19 Observation of the Topological Structure of Exceptional Points, Phys. Rev. Lett.86, 787 (2001)

    work page 2001

  11. [11]

    El-Ganainy, K

    R. El-Ganainy, K. G. Makris, M. Khajavikhan, Z. H. Musslimani, S. Rotter, and D. N. Christodoulides, Non- Hermitian physics and PT symmetry, Nat. Phys.14, 11 (2018)

    work page 2018

  12. [12]

    H.Xu, D.Mason, L.Jiang,andJ.G.E.Harris,Topolog- ical energy transfer in an optomechanical system with exceptional points, Nature537, 80 (2016)

    work page 2016

  13. [13]

    Hodaei, A

    H. Hodaei, A. U. Hassan, S. Wittek, H. Garcia-Gracia, R. El-Ganainy, D. N. Christodoulides, and M. Kha- javikhan, Enhanced sensitivity at higher-order excep- tional points, Nature548, 187 (2017)

    work page 2017

  14. [14]

    C. E. Rüter, K. G. Makris, R. El-Ganainy, D. N. Christodoulides, M. Segev, and D. Kip, Observation of parity–time symmetry in optics, Nat. Phys.6, 192 (2010)

    work page 2010

  15. [15]

    Yang and C

    M. Yang and C. H. Lee, Beyond the non-hermitian skin effect: Scaling-controlled topology from exceptional- bound bands, Advanced Science13, e23989 (2026)

    work page 2026

  16. [16]

    Yokomizo and S

    K. Yokomizo and S. Murakami, Non-bloch band theory of non-hermitian systems, Physical review letters123, 066404 (2019)

    work page 2019

  17. [17]

    Ashida, Z

    Y. Ashida, Z. Gong, and M. Ueda, Non-hermitian physics, Advances in Physics69, 249 (2020)

    work page 2020

  18. [18]

    R. Lin, T. Tai, L. Li, and C. H. Lee, Topological non- hermitian skin effect, Frontiers of Physics18, 53605 (2023)

    work page 2023

  19. [19]

    H. Meng, Y. S. Ang, and C. H. Lee, Gener- alized brillouin zone fragmentation, arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.13275 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  20. [20]

    Kawabata, K

    K. Kawabata, K. Shiozaki, M. Ueda, and M. Sato, Sym- metry and Topology in Non-Hermitian Physics, Phys. Rev. X9, 041015 (2019)

    work page 2019

  21. [21]

    Delplace, T

    P. Delplace, T. Yoshida, and Y. Hatsugai, Symmetry- ProtectedMultifoldExceptionalPointsandTheirTopo- logical Characterization, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 186602 (2021)

    work page 2021

  22. [22]

    Xiao and C

    Y.-X. Xiao and C. T. Chan, Topology in non-Hermitian Chern insulators with skin effect, Phys. Rev. B105, 075128 (2022)

    work page 2022

  23. [23]

    Jiang, C

    H. Jiang, C. Yang, and S. Chen, Topological invariants and phase diagrams for one-dimensional two-band non- Hermitian systems without chiral symmetry, Phys. Rev. A98, 10.1103/PhysRevA.98.052116 (2018)

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.98.052116 2018

  24. [24]

    Zhang, Y

    X. Zhang, Y. Tian, J.-H. Jiang, M.-H. Lu, and Y.-F. Chen, Observation of higher-order non-Hermitian skin effect, Nat. Commun.12, 5377 (2021)

    work page 2021

  25. [25]

    D. S. Borgnia, A. J. Kruchkov, and R. J. Slager, Non- Hermitian Boundary Modes and Topology, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 56802 (2020)

    work page 2020

  26. [26]

    K. Ding, C. Fang, and G. Ma, Non-Hermitian topology and exceptional-point geometries, Nat. Rev. Phys.4, 745 (2022)

    work page 2022

  27. [27]

    F. K. Kunst, E. Edvardsson, J. C. Budich, and E. J. Bergholtz, Biorthogonal Bulk-Boundary Corre- spondence in Non-Hermitian Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 026808 (2018)

    work page 2018

  28. [28]

    Zhang, X

    W. Zhang, X. Ouyang, X. Huang, X. Wang, H. Zhang, Y. Yu, X. Chang, Y. Liu, D.-L. Deng, and L.-M. Duan, Observation of Non-Hermitian Topology with Nonuni- tary Dynamics of Solid-State Spins, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 090501 (2021)

    work page 2021

  29. [29]

    Y. Wang, Y. Wu, X. Ye, C.-K. Duan, Y. Wang, H. Hu, X. Rong, and J. Du, Non-Hermitian non-Abelian topo- logical transition in the S = 1 electron spin system of a nitrogen vacancy centre in diamond, Nat. Nanotechnol. 20, 873 (2025)

    work page 2025

  30. [30]

    Y. S. Patil, J. Höller, P. A. Henry, C. Guria, Y. Zhang, L. Jiang, N. Kralj, N. Read, and J. G. Harris, Measur- ing the knot of non-Hermitian degeneracies and non- commuting braids, Nature607, 271 (2022)

    work page 2022

  31. [31]

    M.-M. Cao, K. Li, W.-D. Zhao, W.-X. Guo, B.-X. Qi, X.-Y. Chang, Z.-C. Zhou, Y. Xu, and L.-M. Duan, Probing Complex-Energy Topology via Non-Hermitian Absorption Spectroscopy in a Trapped Ion Simulator, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 163001 (2023)

    work page 2023

  32. [32]

    W. Cao, W. Zhang, and X. Zhang, Observation of knot topology of exceptional points, Phys. Rev. B109, 165128 (2024)

    work page 2024

  33. [33]

    W. Cao, X. Qin, W. Zhang, X. Zhou, and X. Zhang, Topological fractal braiding of non-Hermitian bands, Commun. Phys.8, 391 (2025)

    work page 2025

  34. [34]

    Zhang, T

    H. Zhang, T. Liu, Z. Xiang, K. Xu, H. Fan, and D. Zheng, Topological Eigenvalue Braiding and Quan- tum State Transfer Near a Third-Order Exceptional Point, PRX Quantum6, 020328 (2025)

    work page 2025

  35. [35]

    P. R. Han, W. Ning, X. J. Huang, R. H. Zheng, S. B. Yang, F. Wu, Z. B. Yang, Q. P. Su, C. P. Yang, and S. B. Zheng, Measuring topological invariants for higher-order exceptional points in quantum three-mode systems, Nat. Commun.15, 8 (2024)

    work page 2024

  36. [36]

    Wang and C

    A. Wang and C. Q. Chen, Observing non-Bloch braids and phase transitions by precise manipulation of the non-Hermitian boundary and size, Communications Physics8, 294 (2025)

    work page 2025

  37. [37]

    Z. Rao, C. Meng, Y. Han, L. Zhu, K. Ding, and Z. An, Braiding reflectionless states in non-Hermitian magnon- ics, Nat. Phys.20, 1904 (2024)

    work page 1904

  38. [38]

    Zhang, Y

    Q. Zhang, Y. Li, H. Sun, X. Liu, L. Zhao, X. Feng, X. Fan, and C. Qiu, Observation of acoustic non- hermitian bloch braids and associated topological phase transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 017201 (2023)

    work page 2023

  39. [39]

    Zhang, L

    Q. Zhang, L. Zhao, X. Liu, X. Feng, L. Xiong, W. Wu, and C. Qiu, Experimental characterization of three- band braid relations in non-Hermitian acoustic lattices, Phys. Rev. Res.5, L022050 (2023)

    work page 2023

  40. [40]

    S. Tong, Q. Zhang, L. Qi, G. Li, X. Feng, and C. Qiu, Observation of Floquet-Bloch Braids in Non-Hermitian Spatiotemporal Lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 126603 (2025)

    work page 2025

  41. [41]

    W. Tang, K. Ding, and G. Ma, Experimental realiza- tion of non-Abelian permutations in a three-state non- Hermitian system, Natl. Sci. Rev.9, 22 (2022)

    work page 2022

  42. [42]

    J. Chen, Z. Wang, Y.-T. Tan, C. Wang, and J. Ren, Ma- chine learning of knot topology in non-hermitian band braids, Communications Physics7, 209 (2024)

    work page 2024

  43. [43]

    Y. Long, H. Xue, and B. Zhang, Unsupervised learning of topological non-Abelian braiding in non-Hermitian bands, Nature Machine Intelligence6, 904 (2024)

    work page 2024

  44. [44]

    Naghiloo, M

    M. Naghiloo, M. Abbasi, Y. N. Joglekar, and K. Murch, Quantumstatetomographyacrosstheexceptionalpoint in a single dissipative qubit, Nature Physics15, 1232 (2019)

    work page 2019

  45. [45]

    Y. Wu, W. Liu, J. Geng, X. Song, X. Ye, C.-K. Duan, X. Rong, and J. Du, Observation of parity-time symme- try breaking in a single-spin system, Science364, 878 (2019). 20

    work page 2019

  46. [46]

    J. Li, A. K. Harter, J. Liu, L. de Melo, Y. N. Joglekar, andL.Luo,Observationofparity-timesymmetrybreak- ing transitions in a dissipative floquet system of ultra- cold atoms, Nature Communications10, 855 (2019)

    work page 2019

  47. [47]

    Partanen, J

    M. Partanen, J. Goetz, K. Y. Tan, K. Kohvakka, V. Sevriuk, R. E. Lake, R. Kokkoniemi, J. Ikonen, D. Hazra, A. Mäkinen,et al., Exceptional points in tunable superconducting resonators, Physical Review B 100, 134505 (2019)

    work page 2019

  48. [48]

    L. Ding, K. Shi, Q. Zhang, D. Shen, X. Zhang, and W. Zhang, Experimental determination of pt-symmetric exceptional points in a single trapped ion, Physical Re- view Letters126, 083604 (2021)

    work page 2021

  49. [49]

    Wang, Y.-L

    W.-C. Wang, Y.-L. Zhou, H.-L. Zhang, J. Zhang, M.-C. Zhang, Y. Xie, C.-W. Wu, T. Chen, B.-Q. Ou, W. Wu, H. Jing, and P.-X. Chen, Observation ofPT-symmetric quantum coherence in a single-ion system, Phys. Rev. A103, L020201 (2021)

    work page 2021

  50. [50]

    W. Liu, Y. Wu, C.-K. Duan, X. Rong, and J. Du, Dy- namically encircling an exceptional point in a real quan- tum system, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 170506 (2021)

    work page 2021

  51. [51]

    Z. Ren, D. Liu, E. Zhao, C. He, K. K. Pak, J. Li, and G.-B. Jo, Chiral control of quantum states in non- hermitian spin–orbit-coupled fermions, Nature Physics 18, 385 (2022)

    work page 2022

  52. [52]

    T. Chen, R. Shen, C. H. Lee, and B. Yang, High-fidelity realization of the AKLT state on a NISQ-era quantum processor, SciPost Phys.15, 170 (2023)

    work page 2023

  53. [53]

    Jebraeilli and M

    A. Jebraeilli and M. R. Geller, Quantum simulation of a qubit with a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian, Phys. Rev. A111, 032211 (2025)

    work page 2025

  54. [54]

    Zheng, Duality quantum simulation of a general parity-time-symmetric two-level system, EPL (Euro- physics Letters)123, 40002 (2018)

    C. Zheng, Duality quantum simulation of a general parity-time-symmetric two-level system, EPL (Euro- physics Letters)123, 40002 (2018)

    work page 2018

  55. [55]

    Huang, R.-K

    M. Huang, R.-K. Lee, L. Zhang, S.-M. Fei, and J. Wu, Simulating broken PT-symmetric hamiltonian systems by weak measurement, Physical Review Letters123, 080404 (2019)

    work page 2019

  56. [56]

    J. M. Koh, T. Tai, Y. H. Phee, W. E. Ng, and C. H. Lee, Stabilizing multiple topological fermions on a quantum computer, npj Quantum Information8, 16 (2022)

    work page 2022

  57. [57]

    H. Liu, X. Yang, K. Tang, L. Che, X. Nie, T. Xin, J. Li, and D. Lu, Practical quantum simulation of small- scale non-hermitian dynamics, Physical Review A107, 062608 (2023)

    work page 2023

  58. [58]

    An, J.-P

    D. An, J.-P. Liu, and L. Lin, Linear combination of hamiltonian simulation for nonunitary dynamics with optimal state preparation cost, Physical Review Letters 131, 150603 (2023)

    work page 2023

  59. [59]

    Zheng, L

    C. Zheng, L. Hao, and G.-L. Long, Observation of a fast evolutioninaparity-time-symmetricsystem,Philosoph- ical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathemati- cal, Physical and Engineering Sciences371, 20120053 (2013)

    work page 2013

  60. [60]

    J. Wen, C. Zheng, X. Kong, S. Wei, T. Xin, and G.-L. Long, Experimental demonstration of a digital quantum simulation of a general PT-symmetric system, Physical Review A99, 062122 (2019)

    work page 2019

  61. [61]

    T. Chen, R. Shen, C. Hua Lee, B. Yang, and R. Weda Bomantara, A robust large-period discrete time crystal and its signature in a digital quantum com- puter, Quantum Science and Technology11, 025030 (2026)

    work page 2026

  62. [62]

    Dogra, A

    S. Dogra, A. A. Melnikov, and G. S. Paraoanu, Quan- tum simulation of parity-time symmetry breaking with asuperconductingquantumprocessor,Communications Physics4, 26 (2021)

    work page 2021

  63. [63]

    J. M. Koh, T. Tai, and C. H. Lee, Realization of higher- order topological lattices on a quantum computer, Na- ture Communications15, 5807 (2024)

    work page 2024

  64. [64]

    Z. Lin, L. Zhang, X. Long, Y.-a. Fan, Y. Li, K. Tang, J.Li, X.Nie, T.Xin, X.-J.Liu,andD.Lu,Experimental quantum simulation of non-hermitian dynamical topo- logical states using stochastic Schrödinger equation, npj Quantum Information8, 77 (2022)

    work page 2022

  65. [65]

    J. Bian, P. Lu, T. Liu, H. Wu, X. Rao, K. Wang, Q. Lao, Y. Liu, F. Zhu, and L. Luo, Quantum simulation of a general anti-PT-symmetric hamiltonian with a trapped ion qubit, Fundamental Research3, 904 (2023)

    work page 2023

  66. [66]

    Kivelä, S

    F. Kivelä, S. Dogra, and G. S. Paraoanu, Quan- tum simulation of the pseudo-hermitian landau-zener- stückelberg-majorana effect, Physical Review Research 6, 023246 (2024)

    work page 2024

  67. [67]

    R. Shen, F. Qin, J.-Y. Desaules, Z. Papić, and C. H. Lee, Enhanced many-body quantum scars from the non- hermitian fock skin effect, Physical Review Letters133, 216601 (2024)

    work page 2024

  68. [68]

    J. M. Koh, W.-T. Xue, T. Tai, D. E. Koh, and C. H. Lee, Interacting non-hermitian edge and cluster bursts on a digital quantum processor (2025), arXiv:2503.14595 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  69. [69]

    R. Shen, T. Chen, and C. H. Lee, Circuit structure- preserving error mitigation for high-fidelity quantum simulations (2025), arXiv:2505.17187 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  70. [70]

    Yu, L.-W

    Y. Yu, L.-W. Yu, W. Zhang, H. Zhang, X. Ouyang, Y. Liu, D.-L. Deng, and L.-M. Duan, Experimental un- supervised learning of non-Hermitian knotted phases with solid-state spins, npj Quantum Information8, 116 (2022)

    work page 2022

  71. [71]

    R. Shen, T. Chen, B. Yang, and C. H. Lee, Observa- tion of the non-hermitian skin effect and fermi skin on a digital quantum computer, Nature Communications 16, 1340 (2025)

    work page 2025

  72. [72]

    Y. Wu, Y. Wang, X. Ye, W. Liu, C.-K. Duan, Y. Wang, X. Rong, and J. Du, Observation of the knot topology of non-hermitian systems in a single spin, Physical Review A108, 052409 (2023)

    work page 2023

  73. [73]

    Observation of feedback-directed quantum dynamics in large-scale quantum processors

    R. Shen and C. H. Lee,Observation of feedback-directed quantum dynamics in large-scale quantum processors, arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.11900 (2026)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  74. [74]

    Preskill, Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond, Quantum2, 79 (2018)

    J. Preskill, Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond, Quantum2, 79 (2018)

    work page 2018

  75. [75]

    Zhang, P.-R

    H.-L. Zhang, P.-R. Han, X.-J. Yu, S.-B. Yang, J.-H. Lü, W. Ning, F. Wu, Q.-P. Su, C.-P. Yang, Z.-B. Yang, and S.-B. Zheng, Implementation and topological character- ization of weyl exceptional rings in quantum-mechanical systems, Science Bulletin70, 2446 (2025)

    work page 2025

  76. [76]

    Y.-Y. Chen, K. Li, L. Zhang, Y.-K. Wu, J.-Y. Ma, H.- X. Yang, C. Zhang, B.-X. Qi, Z.-C. Zhou, P.-Y. Hou, Y. Xu, and L.-M. Duan, Quantum tomography of a third-order exceptional point in a dissipative trapped ion, Nature Communications16, 7478 (2025)

    work page 2025

  77. [77]

    Zhang, T

    H. Zhang, T. Liu, Z. Xiang, K. Xu, H. Fan, and D. Zheng, Topological eigenvalue braiding and quantum state transfer near a third-order exceptional point, PRX Quantum6, 020328 (2025)

    work page 2025

  78. [78]

    P.-R. Han, W. Ning, X.-J. Huang, R.-H. Zheng, S.-B. Yang, F. Wu, Z.-B. Yang, Q.-P. Su, C.-P. Yang, and S.- 21 B. Zheng, Measuring topological invariants for higher- order exceptional points in quantum three-mode sys- tems, Nature Communications15, 10293 (2024)

    work page 2024

  79. [79]

    Y. Wang, Y. Wu, X. Ye, C.-K. Duan, Y. Wang, H. Hu, X. Rong, and J. Du, Non-hermitian non-abelian topo- logical transition in the S = 1 electron spin system of a nitrogen vacancy centre in diamond, Nature Nanotech- nology20, 873 (2025)

    work page 2025

  80. [80]

    Laakkonen, E

    T. Laakkonen, E. Rinaldi, C. N. Self, E. Chertkov, M. DeCross, D. Hayes, B. Neyenhuis, M. Benedetti, and K. Meichanetzidis, Less Quantum, MoreAdvantage: An End-to-End Quantum Algorithm for the Jones Polyno- mial, arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.05625 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

Showing first 80 references.