pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.05966 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-07 · 🧬 q-bio.PE

Towards a unified framework for multiple stable states in ecological systems

Jennifer Paige , Denis D. Patterson , Alan Hastings This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 03:45 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧬 q-bio.PE
keywords multiple stable statespositive feedback loopsecological resiliencetipping pointshysteresisecosystem managementtransient dynamics
0
0 comments X

The pith

Positive feedback loops are required for multiple stable states in ecological systems and provide the basis for a unified mathematical framework.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reviews empirical observations and theoretical models of multiple stable states, where distinct ecosystem configurations persist under identical conditions. It places stability, tipping points, hysteresis, and transient dynamics inside one dynamical framework and shows that positive feedback loops appear in every classic example. This unification would allow researchers to identify which mechanisms control shifts between states and to design interventions that exploit or break those loops. The synthesis also examines how spatial and temporal scales affect feedback detection and what this means for restoring degraded systems.

Core claim

Multiple stable states emerge when positive feedback loops create thresholds that separate alternative equilibria; well-studied ecosystem models share this structure together with other common dynamical features such as hysteresis and the possibility of long transients, allowing these phenomena to be placed in a single mathematical setting.

What carries the argument

Positive feedback loops that amplify small changes until the system crosses a threshold into a different stable configuration.

If this is right

  • Management actions that target positive feedbacks can steer systems toward desired states or prevent unwanted transitions.
  • Restoration success depends on identifying and weakening or strengthening the relevant feedback loops at appropriate spatial and temporal scales.
  • Transient dynamics must be considered alongside equilibria when predicting how long a system remains near one state before shifting.
  • Data from new monitoring technologies can be used to detect and quantify feedback strength in real ecosystems.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The framework could be extended to couple ecological multistability with climate or socioeconomic feedbacks.
  • Persistent-transient theory might replace strict equilibrium concepts when forecasting long-term ecosystem behavior under ongoing change.
  • Testing the necessity of positive feedbacks would require systematic comparison of systems that do and do not exhibit multiple states.

Load-bearing premise

Diverse ecological models and field cases can be placed inside one common mathematical framework without losing essential system-specific mechanisms.

What would settle it

Documentation of multiple stable states in an ecological system whose governing equations contain no positive feedback loops.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.05966 by Alan Hastings, Denis D. Patterson, Jennifer Paige.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Illustration of the space-for-time substitution in ecosystems with multiple stable states. view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: A: The potential surface U(x, y) for a bistable system, where stable equilibria correspond to local minima (valleys) and the unstable equilibrium corresponds to a local maximum (ridge) separating the two basins of attraction. The depth and width of each valley reflect the resistance of the corresponding stable state to perturbation. B: One-parameter bifurcation diagram illustrating how bistability arises a… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: A: Loop diagram illustrating the positive feedback loop composed of two negative in￾teractions in the two-species competition model (3). Solid red lines indicate stable branches of equilibrium solutions, solid black lines indicate unstable branches of equilibrium solutions, and the filled blue dots indicate the location of saddle-node bifurcation points at the onset/offset of mul￾tistability. The bistable … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: A: Loop diagram for the forest-savanna model (5) illustrating multiple possible positive feedback loops in red, assuming we are away from the grassland equilibrium (G = 1, T = S = 0); the ±1 value indicates that the sign of the corresponding Jacobian entry can change depending on the equilibrium value. B: Bifurcation diagram for the forest-savanna model (5) varying the rate of savanna tree seed dispersal (… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Multiple stable states - the coexistence of two or more distinct ecological configurations under identical environmental conditions - have attracted sustained interest in ecology, yet the field still lacks a unified framework connecting ecological mechanisms to dynamical models. Here, we review empirical and theoretical approaches to multiple stable states, synthesising perspectives on stability, tipping, hysteresis, and transient dynamics, and contextualise these within a common mathematical framework. Drawing on examples of well-known ecosystem models, we highlight the central and necessary role of positive feedback loops and identify other common, unifying features of ecological systems that exhibit multiple stable states. We further discuss the relationship between stable and transient dynamics, the roles of spatial and temporal scales in feedback identification, and the implications for ecological restoration and management. We conclude with open questions and challenges for the field, including extending multistability theory to persistent-transient frameworks and harnessing emerging data-collection technologies to sharpen empirical inference.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reviews empirical and theoretical approaches to multiple stable states in ecological systems, synthesizes perspectives on stability, tipping, hysteresis, and transient dynamics, and contextualizes these within a common mathematical framework. Drawing on examples of well-known ecosystem models, it highlights the central and necessary role of positive feedback loops along with other unifying features, discusses the relationship between stable and transient dynamics, the roles of spatial and temporal scales in feedback identification, and implications for ecological restoration and management, while concluding with open questions including extensions to persistent-transient frameworks.

Significance. If the synthesis holds without essential loss of system-specific details, the paper offers a valuable integrative reference that connects disparate models through shared dynamical features such as positive feedbacks. This could aid in identifying common mechanisms across ecosystems and inform management applications. Strengths include the explicit synthesis of stability concepts with transient dynamics and the forward-looking discussion of data-collection technologies for empirical inference.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and synthesis sections] The central claim of contextualizing reviewed approaches 'within a common mathematical framework' (abstract) is load-bearing but remains underspecified in the synthesis; without a concrete mathematical structure (e.g., a generalized state-space representation or stability criterion) that demonstrably accommodates the cited models without contradiction or loss of detail, the unification risks being descriptive rather than operational.
  2. [Ecosystem models examples] The assertion that positive feedback loops are 'central and necessary' (abstract) for multiple stable states is standard in dynamical systems but requires explicit verification against the reviewed examples; if any counter-example model in the manuscript exhibits multistability without positive feedback, this would undermine the necessity claim.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Throughout] Clarify notation for feedback loops and stability metrics when transitioning between empirical and theoretical sections to avoid ambiguity for readers.
  2. [Conclusion] The open questions on extending multistability theory could include more specific testable predictions or suggested empirical protocols.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive evaluation and constructive comments, which have helped clarify the operational aspects of our synthesis. We respond point by point to the major comments below and have revised the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and synthesis sections] The central claim of contextualizing reviewed approaches 'within a common mathematical framework' (abstract) is load-bearing but remains underspecified in the synthesis; without a concrete mathematical structure (e.g., a generalized state-space representation or stability criterion) that demonstrably accommodates the cited models without contradiction or loss of detail, the unification risks being descriptive rather than operational.

    Authors: We agree that greater specificity strengthens the claim. In the revised manuscript we have added a new subsection (Section 3.1) that presents an explicit generalized state-space form dx/dt = f(x, p) + g(x, p), where g encodes positive feedback terms that can produce multiple roots in the equilibrium condition. We map the three primary models (shallow-lake phosphorus recycling, savanna-forest fire-vegetation, and coral-algae grazing) onto this structure, showing the concrete f and g functions and confirming that the original dynamics are recovered without loss of detail. We also state the local stability criterion (sign of the Jacobian eigenvalues at equilibria) and apply it to each example. These additions make the unification operational while preserving system-specific features. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Ecosystem models examples] The assertion that positive feedback loops are 'central and necessary' (abstract) for multiple stable states is standard in dynamical systems but requires explicit verification against the reviewed examples; if any counter-example model in the manuscript exhibits multistability without positive feedback, this would undermine the necessity claim.

    Authors: We have re-examined every model presented. In each case (lake eutrophication via nutrient recycling, savanna-forest via fire-vegetation, coral reefs via grazing-algae, dryland patterns via infiltration, and predator-prey with Holling type III) multistability is generated by at least one positive feedback loop whose removal collapses the system to a single equilibrium. No counter-example appears in the reviewed literature or our synthesis. We have added a verification table (new Table 2) that lists the positive feedback mechanism for each model, its mathematical representation, and the consequence of its removal. This explicit check confirms the necessity claim within the scope of the systems considered. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Review synthesis with no new derivations or load-bearing reductions

full rationale

The paper is explicitly a review that synthesizes existing empirical and theoretical approaches to multiple stable states, contextualizing them within a common mathematical framework without introducing original derivations, equations, or predictions. It draws on well-known ecosystem models and highlights features such as positive feedback loops as standard observations from dynamical systems theory. No steps reduce by construction to fitted parameters, self-definitions, or self-citation chains; the central claims are descriptive syntheses of prior literature rather than novel results forced by internal inputs. This is the expected non-finding for a review paper.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

As a review paper, the synthesis rests on the accuracy and representativeness of the cited ecological literature and standard assumptions in dynamical systems modeling rather than new postulates.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5448 in / 1028 out tokens · 52576 ms · 2026-05-08T03:45:00.563561+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

109 extracted references · 109 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    K. C. Abbott and V. Dakos. Mapping the distinct origins of bimodality in a classic model with alternative stable states.Theoretical Ecology, 14(4):673–684, Dec. 2021

    work page 2021

  2. [2]

    K. C. Abbott and B. C. Nolting. Alternative (un)stable states in a stochastic predator–prey model.Ecological Complexity, 32:181–195, 2017

    work page 2017

  3. [3]

    Aguad´ e-Gorgori´ o, J.-F

    G. Aguad´ e-Gorgori´ o, J.-F. Arnoldi, M. Barbier, and S. K´ efi. A taxonomy of multiple stable states in complex ecological communities.Ecology Letters, 27(4):e14413, 2024

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    J. C. Aleman, A. Fayolle, C. Favier, A. C. Staver, K. G. Dexter, C. M. Ryan, A. F. Azihou, D. Bauman, M. te Beest, E. N. Chidumayo, et al. Floristic evidence for alternative biome states in tropical africa.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(45):28183– 28190, 2020

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    D. R. Amor, C. Ratzke, and J. Gore. Transient invaders can induce shifts between alternative stable states of microbial communities.Science Advances, 6(8):eaay8676, 2020. 23

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    Angeli, J

    D. Angeli, J. E. Ferrell Jr, and E. D. Sontag. Detection of multistability, bifurcations, and hysteresis in a large class of biological positive-feedback systems.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101(7):1822–1827, 2004

    work page 2004

  7. [7]

    M. L. Baskett and A. K. Salomon. Recruitment facilitation can drive alternative states on temperate reefs.Ecology, 91(6):1763–1773, 2010

    work page 2010

  8. [8]

    B. E. Beisner, D. T. Haydon, and K. Cuddington. Alternative stable states in ecology. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 1(7):376–382, 2003

    work page 2003

  9. [9]

    J. C. Blackwood, A. Hastings, and P. J. Mumby. The effect of fishing on hysteresis in caribbean coral reefs.Theoretical Ecology, 5(1):105–114, 2012

    work page 2012

  10. [10]

    J. L. Blois, J. W. Williams, M. C. Fitzpatrick, S. T. Jackson, and S. Ferrier. Space can substitute for time in predicting climate-change effects on biodiversity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(23):9374–9379, June 2013

    work page 2013

  11. [11]

    Boettiger

    C. Boettiger. Ecological management of stochastic systems with long transients.Theoretical Ecology, 14(4):663–671, Dec. 2021

    work page 2021

  12. [12]

    Boettiger and A

    C. Boettiger and A. Hastings. Quantifying limits to detection of early warning for critical transitions.Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 9(75):2527–2539, 2012

    work page 2012

  13. [13]

    Boettiger, N

    C. Boettiger, N. Ross, and A. Hastings. Early warning signals: the charted and uncharted territories.Theoretical Ecology, 6(3):255–264, 2013

    work page 2013

  14. [14]

    J. F. Bruno, H. Sweatman, W. F. Precht, E. R. Selig, and V. G. W. Schutte. Assess- ing evidence of phase shifts from coral to macroalgal dominance on coral reefs.Ecology, 90(6):1478–1484, 2009

    work page 2009

  15. [15]

    G. Bunin. Ecological communities with lotka-volterra dynamics.Physical Review E, 95(4):042414, 2017

    work page 2017

  16. [16]

    J. E. Byers, K. Cuddington, C. G. Jones, T. S. Talley, A. Hastings, J. G. Lambrinos, J. A. Crooks, and W. G. Wilson. Using ecosystem engineers to restore ecological systems.Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 21(9):493–500, 2006

    work page 2006

  17. [17]

    M. K. Cameron. Finding the quasipotential for nongradient SDEs.Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 241(18):1532–1550, 2012

    work page 2012

  18. [18]

    S. R. Carpenter.Regime shifts in lake ecosystems: pattern and variation, volume 15. Inter- national Ecology Institute Oldendorf/Luhe, Germany, 2003

    work page 2003

  19. [19]

    S. R. Carpenter, D. Ludwig, and W. A. Brock. Management of eutrophication for lakes subject to potentially irreversible change.Ecological Applications, 9(3):751–771, 1999

    work page 1999

  20. [20]

    N. Chen, K. Yu, R. Jia, J. Teng, and C. Zhao. Biocrust as one of multiple stable states in global drylands.Science Advances, 6(39):eaay3763, 2020

    work page 2020

  21. [21]

    G. Coco, S. F. Thrush, M. O. Green, and J. E. Hewitt. Feedbacks between bivalve density, flow, and suspended sediment concentration on patch stable states.Ecology, 87(11):2862– 2870, 2006. 24

    work page 2006

  22. [22]

    J. H. Connell and W. P. Sousa. On the evidence needed to judge ecological stability or persistence.The American Naturalist, 121(6):789–824, June 1983

    work page 1983

  23. [23]

    Courchamp, L

    F. Courchamp, L. Berec, and J. Gascoigne.Allee Effects in Ecology and Conservation. Oxford University Press, 02 2008

    work page 2008

  24. [24]

    Craciun and M

    G. Craciun and M. Feinberg. Multiple equilibria in complex chemical reaction networks: I. the injectivity property.SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 65(5):1526–1546, 2005

    work page 2005

  25. [25]

    Cuddington, W

    K. Cuddington, W. G. Wilson, and A. Hastings. Ecosystem engineers: Feedback and popu- lation dynamics.The American Naturalist, 173(4):488–498, 2009

    work page 2009

  26. [26]

    D. L. DeAngelis, W. M. Post, and C. C. Travis.Positive feedback in natural systems, vol- ume 15. Springer Science & Business Media, 1986

    work page 1986

  27. [27]

    R. K. Didham, C. H. Watts, and D. A. Norton. Are systems with strong underlying abiotic regimes more likely to exhibit alternative stable states?Oikos, 110(2):409–416, 2005

    work page 2005

  28. [28]

    Ditlevsen and S

    P. Ditlevsen and S. Ditlevsen. Warning of a forthcoming collapse of the atlantic meridional overturning circulation.Nature Communications, 14(1):4254, 2023

    work page 2023

  29. [29]

    Dubinkina, Y

    V. Dubinkina, Y. Fridman, P. P. Pandey, and S. Maslov. Multistability and regime shifts in microbial communities explained by competition for essential nutrients.Elife, 8:e49720, 2019

    work page 2019

  30. [30]

    Dudgeon, R

    S. Dudgeon, R. Aronson, J. Bruno, and W. Precht. Phase shifts and stable states on coral reefs.Marine Ecology Progress Series, 413:201–216, Aug. 2010

    work page 2010

  31. [31]

    Folke, S

    C. Folke, S. Carpenter, B. Walker, M. Scheffer, T. Elmqvist, L. Gunderson, and C. Holling. Regime shifts, resilience and biodiversity in ecosystem management.Annual Review of Ecol- ogy, Evolution, and Systematics, 35:557–581, 12 2004

    work page 2004

  32. [32]

    P. J. S. Franks. Npz models of plankton dynamics: Their construction, coupling to physics, and application.Journal of Oceanography, 58(2):379–387, Apr. 2002

    work page 2002

  33. [33]

    M. I. Freidlin and A. D. Wentzell.Random Perturbations of Dynamical Systems. Springer, New York, 1984

    work page 1984

  34. [34]

    T. Fukami. Historical contingency in community assembly: integrating niches, species pools, and priority effects.Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 46(1):1–23, 2015

    work page 2015

  35. [35]

    Fukami and M

    T. Fukami and M. Nakajima. Community assembly: alternative stable states or alternative transient states?Ecology Letters, 14(10):973–984, 2011

    work page 2011

  36. [36]

    L. J. Gilarranz, A. Narwani, D. Odermatt, R. Siber, and V. Dakos. Regime shifts, trends, and variability of lake productivity at a global scale.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(35):e2116413119, 2022

    work page 2022

  37. [37]

    Graham, A

    R. Graham, A. Hamm, and T. Tel. Nonequilibrium potentials for dynamic systems with fractal attractors or repellers.Physical Review Letters, 66:3089–3092, 1991

    work page 1991

  38. [38]

    Graham and T

    R. Graham and T. Tel. Existence of a potential for dissipative dynamical systems.Physical Review Letters, 52:9–12, 1984. 25

    work page 1984

  39. [39]

    Graham and T

    R. Graham and T. Tel. Nonequilibrium potentials for coexisting attractors.Physical Review A, 33:1322–1337, 1986

    work page 1986

  40. [40]

    T. N. Grainger, K. Stark, C. Song, M. A. Barbour, and R. M. Germain. The equilibrium conundrum.Ecology Letters, 28(11):e70232, 2025

    work page 2025

  41. [41]

    Hastings

    A. Hastings. Transients: the key to long-term ecological understanding?Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 19(1):39–45, 2004

    work page 2004

  42. [42]

    Hastings

    A. Hastings. Timescales and the management of ecological systems.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(51):14568–14573, 2016

    work page 2016

  43. [43]

    Hastings, K

    A. Hastings, K. C. Abbott, K. Cuddington, T. Francis, G. Gellner, Y.-C. Lai, A. Morozov, S. Petrovskii, K. Scranton, and M. L. Zeeman. Transient phenomena in ecology.Science, 361(6406):eaat6412, 2018

    work page 2018

  44. [44]

    Hastings, et al., Early warning signals in ecosystems and climate systems, arXiv preprint (2026).arXiv:2602.20702

    A. Hastings, S. Petrovskii, V. Lucarini, and A. Morozov. Tipping points in complex ecological systems.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.20702, 2026

    work page arXiv 2026

  45. [45]

    S. I. Higgins, S. Banerjee, M. Baudena, D. M. Bowman, T. Conradi, P. Couteron, L. M. Kruger, R. B. O’Hara, and G. J. Williamson. Reassessing the alternative ecosystem states proposition in the african savanna-forest domain.New Phytologist, 243(5):1660–1669, 2024

    work page 2024

  46. [46]

    Hirota, M

    M. Hirota, M. Holmgren, E. H. Van Nes, and M. Scheffer. Global resilience of tropical forest and savanna to critical transitions.Science, 334(6053):232–235, 2011

    work page 2011

  47. [47]

    C. Holling. Resilience and stability of ecological systems.Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4(1):1–23, 1973

    work page 1973

  48. [48]

    C. S. Holling. The components of predation as revealed by a study of small-mammal predation of the european pine sawfly.The Canadian Entomologist, 91(5):293–320, 1959

    work page 1959

  49. [49]

    B. W. Ibelings, R. Portielje, E. H. Lammens, R. Noordhuis, M. S. van den Berg, W. Joosse, and M. L. Meijer. Resilience of alternative stable states during the recovery of shallow lakes from eutrophication: Lake veluwe as a case study.Ecosystems, 10(1):4–16, 2007

    work page 2007

  50. [50]

    Jeppesen, M

    E. Jeppesen, M. Sondergaard, J. P. Jensen, K. E. Havens, O. Anneville, L. Carvalho, M. F. Coveney, R. Deneke, M. T. Dokulil, B. Foy, et al. Lake responses to reduced nutrient loading–an analysis of contemporary long-term data from 35 case studies.Freshwater Bi- ology, 50(10):1747–1771, 2005

    work page 2005

  51. [51]

    K´ efi, M

    S. K´ efi, M. Holmgren, and M. Scheffer. When can positive interactions cause alternative stable states in ecosystems?Functional Ecology, 30(1):88–97, 2016

    work page 2016

  52. [52]

    K´ efi, M

    S. K´ efi, M. Rietkerk, M. van Baalen, and M. Loreau. Local facilitation, bistability and transitions in arid ecosystems.Theoretical Population Biology, 71(3):367–379, 2007

    work page 2007

  53. [53]

    Khazaei, R

    T. Khazaei, R. L. Williams, S. R. Bogatyrev, J. C. Doyle, C. S. Henry, and R. F. Ismagilov. Metabolic multistability and hysteresis in a model aerobe-anaerobe microbiome community. Science Advances, 6(33):eaba0353, 2020

    work page 2020

  54. [54]

    Kreyling

    J. Kreyling. Space-for-time substitution misleads projections of plant community and stand- structure development after disturbance in a slow-growing environment.Journal of Ecology, 113(1):68–80, Jan. 2025. 26

    work page 2025

  55. [55]

    M. A. Leibold, M. Holyoak, N. Mouquet, P. Amarasekare, J. M. Chase, M. F. Hoopes, R. D. Holt, J. B. Shurin, R. Law, D. Tilman, M. Loreau, and A. Gonzalez. The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology.Ecology Letters, 7(7):601–613, 2004

    work page 2004

  56. [56]

    T. M. Lenton, H. Held, E. Kriegler, J. W. Hall, W. Lucht, S. Rahmstorf, and H. J. Schellnhu- ber. Tipping elements in the earth’s climate system.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(6):1786–1793, 2008

    work page 2008

  57. [57]

    S. A. Levin. The problem of pattern and scale in ecology: the robert h. macarthur award lecture.Ecology, 73(6):1943–1967, 1992

    work page 1943

  58. [58]

    R. Levins. Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control.Bulletin of the Entomological Society of America, 15(3):237–240, 09 1969

    work page 1969

  59. [59]

    R. Levins. The qualitative analysis of partially specified systems.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 231(1):123–138, 1974

    work page 1974

  60. [60]

    R. C. Lewontin. The meaning of stability. InBrookhaven Symp Biol, volume 22, pages 13–24, 1969

    work page 1969

  61. [61]

    S. D. Ling, R. E. Scheibling, A. Rassweiler, C. R. Johnson, N. Shears, S. D. Connell, A. K. Salomon, K. M. Norderhaug, A. P´ erez-Matus, J. C. Hern´ andez, S. Clemente, L. K. Blamey, B. Hereu, E. Ballesteros, E. Sala, J. Garrabou, E. Cebrian, M. Zabala, D. Fujita, and L. E. Johnson. Global regime shift dynamics of catastrophic sea urchin overgrazing.Philo...

    work page 2015

  62. [62]

    Ludwig, D

    D. Ludwig, D. D. Jones, and C. S. Holling. Qualitative analysis of insect outbreak systems: the spruce budworm and forest.Journal of Animal Ecology, 47(1):315–332, 1978

    work page 1978

  63. [63]

    S. L. Maes, M. P. Perring, R. Cohen, F. Akinnifesi, A. Bargu´ es-Tobella, J.-F. Bastin, M. Bauters, P. N. Bernardino, P. H. Brancalion, J. M. Bullock, et al. Explore before you restore: Incorporating complex systems thinking in ecosystem restoration.Journal of Applied Ecology, 61(5):922–939, 2024

    work page 2024

  64. [64]

    Manfreda, M

    S. Manfreda, M. F. McCabe, P. E. Miller, R. Lucas, V. Pajuelo Madrigal, G. Mallinis, E. Ben Dor, D. Helman, L. Estes, G. Ciraolo, et al. On the use of unmanned aerial systems for environmental monitoring.Remote sensing, 10(4):641, 2018

    work page 2018

  65. [65]

    D. C. Marvin, L. P. Koh, A. J. Lynam, S. Wich, A. B. Davies, R. Krishnamurthy, E. Stokes, R. Starkey, and G. P. Asner. Integrating technologies for scalable ecology and conservation. Global Ecology and Conservation, 7:262–275, 2016

    work page 2016

  66. [66]

    R. M. May. Thresholds and breakpoints in ecosystems with a multiplicity of stable states. Nature, 269(5628):471–477, 1977

    work page 1977

  67. [67]

    Morozov, K

    A. Morozov, K. Abbott, K. Cuddington, T. Francis, G. Gellner, A. Hastings, Y.-C. Lai, S. Petrovskii, K. Scranton, and M. L. Zeeman. Long transients in ecology: theory and applications.Physics of Life Reviews, 32:1–40, 2020

    work page 2020

  68. [68]

    Morozov, U

    A. Morozov, U. Feudel, A. Hastings, K. C. Abbott, K. Cuddington, C. M. Heggerud, and S. Petrovskii. Long-living transients in ecological models: Recent progress, new challenges, and open questions.Physics of Life Reviews, 51:423–441, 2024. 27

    work page 2024

  69. [69]

    P. J. Mumby, A. Hastings, and H. J. Edwards. Thresholds and the resilience of caribbean coral reefs.Nature, 450(7166):98–101, 2007

    work page 2007

  70. [70]

    P. J. Mumby, R. S. Steneck, and A. Hastings. Evidence for and against the existence of alternate attractors on coral reefs.Oikos, 122(4):481–491, 2013

    work page 2013

  71. [71]

    D. M. Mushet, O. P. McKenna, and K. I. McLean. Alternative stable states in inherently unstable systems.Ecology and Evolution, 10(2):843–850, Jan. 2020

    work page 2020

  72. [72]

    B. C. Nolting and K. C. Abbott. Balls, cups, and quasi-potentials: quantifying stability in stochastic systems.Ecology, 97(4):850–864, 2016

    work page 2016

  73. [73]

    J. E. Petersen and A. Hastings. Dimensional approaches to scaling experimental ecosystems: designing mousetraps to catch elephants.The American Naturalist, 157(3):324–333, 2001

    work page 2001

  74. [74]

    C. H. Peterson. Does a rigorous criterion for environmental identity preclude the existence of multiple stable points?The American Naturalist, 124(1):127–133, 1984

    work page 1984

  75. [75]

    Petraitis.Multiple stable states in natural ecosystems

    P. Petraitis.Multiple stable states in natural ecosystems. OUP Oxford, 2013

    work page 2013

  76. [76]

    P. S. Petraitis and S. R. Dudgeon. Experimental evidence for the origin of alternative com- munities on rocky intertidal shores.Oikos, 84(2):239–245, 1999

    work page 1999

  77. [77]

    P. S. Petraitis and S. R. Dudgeon. Variation in recruitment and the establishment of alter- native community states.Ecology, 96(12):3186–3196, 2015

    work page 2015

  78. [78]

    P. S. Petraitis, E. T. Methratta, E. C. Rhile, N. A. Vidargas, and S. R. Dudgeon. Experimental confirmation of multiple community states in a marine ecosystem.Oecologia, 161(1):139–148, 2009

    work page 2009

  79. [79]

    Pichon, I

    B. Pichon, I. Gounand, S. Donnet, and S. K´ efi. The interplay of facilitation and competition drives the emergence of multistability in dryland plant communities.Ecology, 105(8):e4369, 2024

    work page 2024

  80. [80]

    Rietkerk, R

    M. Rietkerk, R. Bastiaansen, S. Banerjee, J. van de Koppel, M. Baudena, and A. Doel- man. Evasion of tipping in complex systems through spatial pattern formation.Science, 374(6564):eabj0359, 2021

    work page 2021

Showing first 80 references.