pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.26077 · v1 · pith:EQZVOL7Znew · submitted 2026-05-25 · ✦ hep-th · gr-qc

On Perturbatively Dressed Observables

Clifford Cheung , Allic Sivaramakrishnan , Jordan Wilson-Gerow , Lihang Zhou This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 20:27 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th gr-qc
keywords dressed observableskinematic singularitiesgauge fixingperturbative matrix elementselectrodynamicsgeneral relativityrelational observablesdynamical gauge
0
0 comments X

The pith

Perturbative dressing of local operators in electrodynamics and gravity induces kinematic singularities and equates to gauge fixing.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper computes perturbatively the matrix elements of local operators dressed with potential and radiative photons or gravitons in electrodynamics and general relativity. It establishes that dressing introduces kinematic singularities that reshape the observables in a substantive manner rather than serving as a minor correction. The authors further demonstrate that dressing is mathematically equivalent to gauge fixing by constructing a dynamical temporal gauge whose gauge-fixing vector is a geodesic fluid. A reader would care because local observables in gravity lack absolute meaning without relational definitions, and these calculations supply explicit perturbative results where formal discussions have predominated.

Core claim

Dressing is not ornamental: it universally induces kinematic singularities that can substantively reshape observables. Dressing is mathematically equivalent to gauge fixing, as demonstrated by a dynamical temporal gauge in which the gauge-fixing vector is itself a geodesic fluid. These conclusions follow from explicit perturbative computations of dressed matrix elements that include both potential and radiative contributions in electrodynamics and general relativity.

What carries the argument

Perturbatively dressed local operators that incorporate interactions with photons or gravitons to enforce relational definitions of observables.

If this is right

  • Kinematic singularities appear in all dressed matrix elements computed in the paper.
  • Observables computed with dressed operators differ from their undressed counterparts through these singularities.
  • Gauge-fixing techniques become interchangeable with dressing for the purpose of evaluating matrix elements.
  • A dynamical temporal gauge with a geodesic-fluid vector provides a concrete realization of the equivalence.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The equivalence may permit gauge-fixing methods to be applied directly to problems involving relational observables without separate dressing constructions.
  • Singularities induced by dressing could influence how infrared divergences are regulated in scattering amplitudes that involve local operators.
  • The scarcity of prior explicit calculations noted in the paper implies that similar perturbative dressings could be carried out for additional operators or backgrounds.

Load-bearing premise

That perturbative expansions of dressed matrix elements can be performed and are sufficient to expose universal kinematic singularities together with the equivalence to gauge fixing.

What would settle it

An explicit perturbative calculation of a dressed matrix element in electrodynamics or general relativity that contains no kinematic singularities or that fails to reproduce the corresponding gauge-fixed result.

read the original abstract

A central lesson of gravity is that local observables are ill-defined. Coordinates themselves are a redundancy of description, so any particular point in spacetime is only meaningful once defined relationally by clocks, rulers, or asymptotic data. Despite extensive formal work on this subject, explicit calculations of the resulting gravitationally-dressed observables are more scarce. In this paper we perturbatively compute dressed matrix elements of local operators in electrodynamics and general relativity, including both potential and radiative photons and gravitons. Our expressions indicate that dressing is not ornamental: it universally induces kinematic singularities that can substantively reshape observables. We further show how dressing is mathematically equivalent to gauge fixing, as demonstrated by a dynamical temporal gauge in which the gauge-fixing vector is itself a geodesic fluid.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents perturbative computations of dressed matrix elements of local operators in electrodynamics and general relativity, including both potential and radiative modes. It concludes that dressing universally induces kinematic singularities that reshape observables and demonstrates mathematical equivalence between dressing and gauge fixing via an explicit construction of a dynamical temporal gauge in which the gauge-fixing vector is a geodesic fluid.

Significance. If the claimed perturbative expressions hold, the work supplies concrete calculations showing that dressing is physically consequential rather than formal, together with a direct link to gauge fixing. This advances the study of relational observables by moving from abstract discussions to explicit results in both QED and GR, and the provision of explicit expressions (including potential and radiative contributions) is a strength.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript, accurate summary of the results on kinematic singularities and the dressing-gauge fixing equivalence, and recommendation to accept. We are pleased that the explicit perturbative calculations in QED and GR, including potential and radiative modes, are viewed as advancing the study of relational observables.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The paper's central claims rest on explicit perturbative computations of dressed matrix elements (including potential and radiative modes) in QED and GR, plus a concrete construction of a dynamical temporal gauge with geodesic-fluid vector. No quoted equations, self-citations, fitted parameters, or ansatze are shown that reduce by construction to the inputs. The derivations are presented as independent calculations yielding new kinematic singularities and gauge equivalence, making the work self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No full text available; unable to extract free parameters, axioms, or invented entities from the abstract alone.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5655 in / 992 out tokens · 41592 ms · 2026-06-29T20:27:55.373930+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 59 canonical work pages · 18 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Advanced ligo,

    J. Aasi et al., “Advanced ligo,”Classical and quantum gravity32no. 7, (2015) 074001

    2015

  2. [2]

    The quantization of geometry,

    B. DeWitt, “The quantization of geometry,” inGravitation: An Introduction to Current Research, L. Witten, ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1962

    1962

  3. [3]

    A CFT Perspective on Gravitational Dressing and Bulk Locality

    A. Lewkowycz, G. J. Turiaci, and H. Verlinde, “A CFT Perspective on Gravitational Dressing and Bulk Locality,”JHEP01(2017) 004,arXiv:1608.08977 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  4. [4]

    Gauge-invariant observables, gravitational dressings, and holography in AdS

    S. B. Giddings and A. Kinsella, “Gauge-invariant observables, gravitational dress- ings, and holography in AdS,”JHEP11(2018) 074,arXiv:1802.01602 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  5. [5]

    Chandrasekaran, G

    V. Chandrasekaran, G. Penington, and E. Witten, “Large N algebras and general- ized entropy,”JHEP04(2023) 009,arXiv:2209.10454 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  6. [6]

    Crossed products and quantum reference frames: on the observer-dependence of gravitational entropy,

    J. De Vuyst, S. Eccles, P. A. Hoehn, and J. Kirklin, “Crossed products and quantum reference frames: on the observer-dependence of gravitational entropy,”JHEP07 (2025) 063,arXiv:2412.15502 [hep-th]. [Erratum: JHEP 10, 234 (2025)]

    work page arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    On the differential representation and color-kinematics duality of AdS boundary correlators,

    A. Herderschee, R. Roiban, and F. Teng, “On the differential representation and color-kinematics duality of AdS boundary correlators,”JHEP05(2022) 026, arXiv:2201.05067 [hep-th]. 61

    work page arXiv 2022

  8. [8]

    Dressing and Screening in Anti-de Sitter,

    Ankur, L. Di Pietro, V. Gorbenko, S. Komatsu, and V. Sacchi, “Dressing and Screening in Anti-de Sitter,”arXiv:2601.04321 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  9. [9]

    An Algebra of Observables for de Sitter Space

    V. Chandrasekaran, R. Longo, G. Penington, and E. Witten, “An algebra of ob- servables for de Sitter space,”JHEP02(2023) 082,arXiv:2206.10780 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  10. [10]

    A clock is just a way to tell the time: gravitational algebras in cosmological spacetimes,

    C.-H. Chen and G. Penington, “A clock is just a way to tell the time: gravitational algebras in cosmological spacetimes,”arXiv:2406.02116 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  11. [11]

    Real observers solving imaginary problems,

    J. Maldacena, “Real observers solving imaginary problems,”arXiv:2412.14014 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  12. [12]

    Abdalla, S

    A. I. Abdalla, S. Antonini, L. V. Iliesiu, and A. Levine, “The gravitational path integral from an observer’s point of view,”JHEP05(2025) 059,arXiv:2501.02632 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  13. [13]

    Harlow, M

    D. Harlow, M. Usatyuk, and Y. Zhao, “Quantum mechanics and observers for grav- ity in a closed universe,”JHEP02(2026) 108,arXiv:2501.02359 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2026

  14. [14]

    Quantum gravity observables: observation, algebras, and math- ematical structure∗,

    S. B. Giddings, “Quantum gravity observables: observation, algebras, and math- ematical structure∗,”J. Phys. A58no. 41, (2025) 415401,arXiv:2505.22708 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  15. [15]

    Dust as a Standard of Space and Time in Canonical Quantum Gravity

    J. D. Brown and K. V. Kuchar, “Dust as a standard of space and time in canonical quantum gravity,”Phys. Rev. D51(1995) 5600–5629,arXiv:gr-qc/9409001

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  16. [16]

    Observables in effective gravity

    S. B. Giddings, D. Marolf, and J. B. Hartle, “Observables in effective gravity,” Phys. Rev. D74(2006) 064018,arXiv:hep-th/0512200

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  17. [17]

    Diffeomorphism-invariant observables and their nonlocal algebra

    W. Donnelly and S. B. Giddings, “Diffeomorphism-invariant observables and their nonlocal algebra,”Phys. Rev. D93no. 2, (2016) 024030,arXiv:1507.07921 [hep-th]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 94, 029903 (2016)]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  18. [18]

    Observables, gravitational dressing, and obstructions to locality and subsystems

    W. Donnelly and S. B. Giddings, “Observables, gravitational dressing, and ob- structions to locality and subsystems,”Phys. Rev. D94no. 10, (2016) 104038, arXiv:1607.01025 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  19. [19]

    One-loop quantum gravitational corrections to the scalar two-point function at fixed geodesic distance

    M. B. Fröb, “One-loop quantum gravitational corrections to the scalar two-point function at fixed geodesic distance,”Class. Quant. Grav.35no. 3, (2018) 035005, arXiv:1706.01891 [hep-th]. 62

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  20. [20]

    GravitoncorrectionstotheNewtonianpotential using invariant observables,

    M.B.Fröb, C.Rein, andR.Verch, “GravitoncorrectionstotheNewtonianpotential using invariant observables,”JHEP01(2022) 180,arXiv:2109.09753 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  21. [21]

    Gauge-invariant quantum gravitational corrections to correlation functions

    M. B. Fröb, “Gauge-invariant quantum gravitational corrections to correlation func- tions,”Class. Quant. Grav.35no. 5, (2018) 055006,arXiv:1710.00839 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  22. [22]

    Cosmological perturbations and invariant observables in geodesic lightcone coordinates,

    M. B. Fröb and W. C. C. Lima, “Cosmological perturbations and invariant observables in geodesic lightcone coordinates,” JCAP01no. 01, (2022) 034, arXiv:2108.11960 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  23. [23]

    Synchronous coordinates and gauge-invariant observables in cosmological spacetimes,

    M. B. Fröb and W. C. C. Lima, “Synchronous coordinates and gauge-invariant observables in cosmological spacetimes,”Class. Quant. Grav.40no. 21, (2023) 215006,arXiv:2303.16218 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  24. [24]

    Non-commutative coordinates from quantum gravity,

    M. B. Fröb, A. Much, and K. Papadopoulos, “Non-commutative coordinates from quantum gravity,”PoSCORFU2022(2023) 307,arXiv:2303.17238 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  25. [25]

    Noncommutative geometry from perturbative quantum gravity in de Sitter spacetime,

    M. B. Fröb, W. C. C. Lima, A. Much, and K. Papadopoulos, “Noncommutative geometry from perturbative quantum gravity in de Sitter spacetime,”Phys. Rev. D 108no. 8, (2023) 086003,arXiv:2305.01517 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  26. [26]

    Noncommutative geometry from perturbative quantum gravity,

    M. B. Fröb, A. Much, and K. Papadopoulos, “Noncommutative geometry from perturbative quantum gravity,”Phys. Rev. D107no. 6, (2023) 064041, arXiv:2207.03345 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  27. [27]

    A perturbative approach to Dirac observables and their space-time algebra

    B. Dittrich and J. Tambornino, “A Perturbative approach to Dirac observ- ables and their space-time algebra,” Class. Quant. Grav.24(2007) 757–784, arXiv:gr-qc/0610060

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  28. [28]

    Gauge invariant perturbations around symmetry reduced sectors of general relativity: applications to cosmology

    B. Dittrich and J. Tambornino, “Gauge invariant perturbations around symmetry reduced sectors of general relativity: Applications to cosmology,”Class. Quant. Grav.24(2007) 4543–4586,arXiv:gr-qc/0702093

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  29. [29]

    V. A. Smirnov,Analytic Toolsfor FeynmanIntegrals, vol. 250 ofSpringer Tractsin Modern Physics. Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012.https://doi.org/10.1007/ 978-[|3-[|642-[|34886-[|0

    2012

  30. [30]

    Introduction to noncovariant gauges,

    G. Leibbrandt, “Introduction to noncovariant gauges,”Rev. Mod. Phys.59(Oct,

  31. [31]

    1067–1119.https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.59.1067

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.59.1067

  32. [32]

    Generalized prescription for unphysical axial gauge singularities

    A. I. Alekseev, “Generalized prescription for unphysical axial gauge singularities.” 1991. 63

    1991

  33. [33]

    The propagator in the a0 = 0 gauge,

    S. Caracciolo, G. Curci, and P. Menotti, “The propagator in the a0 = 0 gauge,”Physics Letters B113no. 4, (1982) 311–314.https://doi.org/10.1016/ 0370-[|2693(82)90046-[|6

    1982

  34. [34]

    Diffeomorphism-invariant observables and dynamical frames in gravity: reconciling bulk locality with general covariance,

    C. Goeller, P. A. Hoehn, and J. Kirklin, “Diffeomorphism-invariant observables and dynamical frames in gravity: reconciling bulk locality with general covariance,” arXiv:2206.01193 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  35. [35]

    Construction of a Complete Set of Independent Observables in the General Theory of Relativity,

    A. Komar, “Construction of a Complete Set of Independent Observables in the General Theory of Relativity,”Phys. Rev.111no. 4, (1958) 1182

    1958

  36. [36]

    Radiation and the classical double copy for color charges

    W. D. Goldberger and A. K. Ridgway, “Radiation and the classical double copy for color charges,”Phys. Rev. D95no. 12, (2017) 125010,arXiv:1611.03493 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  37. [37]

    Classical double copy of worldline quantum field theory,

    C. Shi and J. Plefka, “Classical double copy of worldline quantum field theory,” Phys. Rev. D105no. 2, (2022) 026007,arXiv:2109.10345 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  38. [38]

    Off-diagonal coefficients of the dewitt-schwinger and hadamard representations of the feynman propagator,

    Y. Décanini and A. Folacci, “Off-diagonal coefficients of the dewitt-schwinger and hadamard representations of the feynman propagator,”Phys.Rev.D73(Feb, 2006) 044027.https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.73.044027

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.73.044027 2006

  39. [39]

    The motion of point particles in curved spacetime

    E. Poisson, A. Pound, and I. Vega, “The Motion of point particles in curved space- time,”Living Rev. Rel.14(2011) 7,arXiv:1102.0529 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  40. [40]

    Reference frames, superselection rules, and quantum information

    S. D. Bartlett, T. Rudolph, and R. W. Spekkens, “Reference frames, superse- lection rules, and quantum information,”Rev. Mod. Phys.79(2007) 555–609, arXiv:quant-ph/0610030

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  41. [41]

    A Paradox and its Resolution Illustrate Principles of de Sitter Holog- raphy,

    L. Susskind, “A Paradox and its Resolution Illustrate Principles of de Sitter Holog- raphy,”JHAP5no. 2, (2025) 1–9,arXiv:2304.00589 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  42. [42]

    Physical instabilities and the phase of the Euclidean path integral,

    V. Ivo, J. Maldacena, and Z. Sun, “Physical instabilities and the phase of the Euclidean path integral,”arXiv:2504.00920 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  43. [43]

    Gravitational entropy is observer-dependent,

    J. De Vuyst, S. Eccles, P. A. Hoehn, and J. Kirklin, “Gravitational entropy is observer-dependent,”JHEP07(2025) 146,arXiv:2405.00114 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    Algebraic Observational Cosmology,

    J. Kudler-Flam, S. Leutheusser, and G. Satishchandran, “Algebraic Observational Cosmology,”arXiv:2406.01669 [hep-th]. 64

    work page arXiv

  45. [45]

    Chaos and the Emergence of the Cosmological Horizon,

    D. K. Kolchmeyer and H. Liu, “Chaos and the Emergence of the Cosmological Horizon,”arXiv:2411.08090 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  46. [46]

    Lessons from the information paradox,

    S. Raju, “Lessons from the information paradox,”Phys. Rept.943(2022) 1–80, arXiv:2012.05770 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  47. [47]

    Inconsistency of islands in theories with long-range gravity,

    H. Geng, A. Karch, C. Perez-Pardavila, S. Raju, L. Randall, M. Riojas, and S. Shashi, “Inconsistency of islands in theories with long-range gravity,”JHEP01 (2022) 182,arXiv:2107.03390 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  48. [48]

    Quantum rods and clock in a gravitational universe,

    H. Geng, “Quantum rods and clock in a gravitational universe,”Phys. Rev. D112 no. 2, (2025) 026009,arXiv:2412.03636 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  49. [49]

    An apologia for islands,

    S. Antonini, C.-H. Chen, H. Maxfield, and G. Penington, “An apologia for islands,” JHEP10(2025) 034,arXiv:2506.04311 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  50. [50]

    Seeing Page Curves and Islands with Blinders On,

    H. Geng, A. Karch, C. Perez-Pardavila, S. Raju, L. Randall, and M. Riojas, “Seeing Page Curves and Islands with Blinders On,”arXiv:2602.06543 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  51. [51]

    On-shell correlators and color-kinematics duality in curved symmetric spacetimes,

    C. Cheung, J. Parra-Martinez, and A. Sivaramakrishnan, “On-shell correlators and color-kinematics duality in curved symmetric spacetimes,”JHEP05(2022) 027, arXiv:2201.05147 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  52. [52]

    Energy Correlators: A Journey From Theory to Experi- ment,

    I. Moult and H. X. Zhu, “Energy Correlators: A Journey From Theory to Experi- ment,”arXiv:2506.09119 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  53. [53]

    Energy Correlators in Perturbative Quan- tum Gravity,

    E. Herrmann, M. Kologlu, and I. Moult, “Energy Correlators in Perturbative Quan- tum Gravity,”arXiv:2412.05384 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  54. [54]

    Classical theories of gravity produce entanglement,

    J. Aziz and R. Howl, “Classical theories of gravity produce entanglement,” Nature646no. 8086, (Oct., 2025) 813–817.https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41586-[|025-[|09595-[|7

    2025

  55. [55]

    Photon-Counting Interferometry to Detect Geontropic Space-Time Fluctuations with GQuEST,

    S. M. Vermeulen et al., “Photon-Counting Interferometry to Detect Geontropic Space-Time Fluctuations with GQuEST,”Phys. Rev. X15no. 1, (2025) 011034, arXiv:2404.07524 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  56. [56]

    Gravity- mediated entanglement between oscillators as quantum superposition of geome- tries,

    O. Bengyat, A. Di Biagio, M. Aspelmeyer, and M. Christodoulou, “Gravity- mediated entanglement between oscillators as quantum superposition of geome- tries,”Phys. Rev. D110no. 5, (2024) 056046,arXiv:2309.16312 [quant-ph]. 65

    work page arXiv 2024

  57. [57]

    Observation of a gravitational Aharonov-Bohm effect,

    C. Overstreet, P. Asenbaum, J. Curti, M. Kim, and M. A. Kasevich, “Observation of a gravitational Aharonov-Bohm effect,”Science375no. 6577, (2021) abl7152

    2021

  58. [58]

    Response of interferometers to the vacuum of quantum gravity

    D. Carney, M. Karydas, and A. Sivaramakrishnan, “Response of interferometers to the vacuum of quantum gravity,”Phys. Rev. D113no. 10, (2026) 106002, arXiv:2409.03894 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  59. [59]

    Snowmass 2021 White Paper: Tabletop experiments for infrared quantum gravity,

    D. Carney, Y. Chen, A. Geraci, H. Müller, C. D. Panda, P. C. E. Stamp, and J. M. Taylor, “Snowmass 2021 White Paper: Tabletop experiments for infrared quantum gravity,” inSnowmass 2021. 3, 2022.arXiv:2203.11846 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  60. [60]

    Using an Atom Interferometer to Infer Gravitational Entanglement Generation,

    D. Carney, H. Müller, and J. M. Taylor, “Using an Atom Interferometer to Infer Gravitational Entanglement Generation,”PRX Quantum2no. 3, (2021) 030330, arXiv:2101.11629 [quant-ph]. [Erratum: PRX Quantum 3, 010902 (2022)]

    work page arXiv 2021

  61. [61]

    Detecting single gravitons withquantumsensing,

    G. Tobar, S. K. Manikandan, T. Beitel, and I. Pikovski, “Detecting single gravitons withquantumsensing,”NatureCommun.15no.1, (2024)7229,arXiv:2308.15440 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  62. [62]

    Observer Time from Causality in Perturbative Quantum Gravity,

    A. Sivaramakrishnan, “Observer Time from Causality in Perturbative Quantum Gravity,”arXiv:2506.16109 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  63. [63]

    Quantum Extremal Surfaces: Holographic Entanglement Entropy beyond the Classical Regime

    N. Engelhardt and A. C. Wall, “Quantum Extremal Surfaces: Holographic Entanglement Entropy beyond the Classical Regime,” JHEP01(2015) 073, arXiv:1408.3203 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  64. [64]

    A Quantum Focussing Conjecture

    R. Bousso, Z. Fisher, S. Leichenauer, and A. C. Wall, “Quantum focusing conjec- ture,”Phys. Rev. D93no. 6, (2016) 064044,arXiv:1506.02669 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  65. [65]

    Generalized entropy of gravitational fluctuations,

    S. Colin-Ellerin, G. Lin, and G. Penington, “Generalized entropy of gravitational fluctuations,”JHEP09(2025) 091,arXiv:2501.08308 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  66. [66]

    Algebras, regions, and observers.,

    E. Witten, “Algebras, regions, and observers.,”Proc. Symp. Pure Math.107(2024) 247–276,arXiv:2303.02837 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  67. [67]

    Jensen, J

    K. Jensen, J. Sorce, and A. J. Speranza, “Generalized entropy for general subregions in quantum gravity,”JHEP12(2023) 020,arXiv:2306.01837 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  68. [68]

    LiteRed 1.4: a powerful tool for the reduction of the multiloop integrals

    R. N. Lee, “LiteRed 1.4: a powerful tool for reduction of multiloop integrals,”J. Phys. Conf. Ser.523(2014) 012059,arXiv:1310.1145 [hep-ph]. 66

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014