pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.26254 · v1 · pith:BU3FYRDVnew · submitted 2026-05-25 · 📡 eess.SY · cs.SY

Small-Signal Stability Manifolds in Converter-Dominated Power Systems

Francesco Conte , Fernando Mancilla-David , Federico Silvestro , Samuele Grillo This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 20:11 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SY cs.SY
keywords small-signal stabilityinverter-based resourcesstability manifoldscontroller parameterspower systemseigenvalue analysissupport vector machineadaptive sampling
0
0 comments X

The pith

Stability manifolds identify controller-parameter regions that keep power systems stable across multiple scenarios as inverter shares rise.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces stability manifolds to map regions of controller parameters that ensure small-signal stability in power systems dominated by grid-following inverter-based resources under varying operating conditions. It builds a framework that linearizes the full network, performs eigenvalue analysis, and uses adaptive sampling with probabilistic support vector machine classification to approximate the stability boundaries efficiently. Surrogate optimization then finds initial controller settings that satisfy bandwidth and phase-margin constraints. Results from validation on a modified Cigré HV benchmark with 50 scenarios indicate that stability sensitivity increases with higher inverter penetration and that interactions among inverters reshape the safe parameter regions. A reader would care because these effects mean simplified models risk missing instability risks in real converter-heavy grids.

Core claim

Stability manifolds are the sets of controller parameters that maintain small-signal stability across multiple operating scenarios in systems with high shares of inverter-based resources. The proposed framework approximates these manifolds through full-network linearization combined with eigenvalue analysis and adaptive sampling driven by probabilistic support vector machine classification, while surrogate optimization locates feasible initial controller tunings that meet bandwidth and phase-margin requirements. Validation on a modified Cigré European HV network benchmark across 50 scenarios with rising inverter penetration shows stability sensitivity grows with inverter share, IBR interacti

What carries the argument

Stability manifolds, defined as controller-parameter regions ensuring stability across scenarios, approximated by combining full-network linearization, eigenvalue analysis, and probabilistic support vector machine adaptive sampling.

If this is right

  • Stability sensitivity grows as the share of inverters increases.
  • Interactions among inverter-based resources reshape the admissible controller-parameter regions.
  • Simplified equivalent-network models can overlook critical system-level stability limitations.
  • The framework supports stability-oriented controller design and interconnection studies in converter-dominated systems.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The manifolds could support real-time parameter adjustment if updated with streaming measurements from the network.
  • Interconnection studies for new inverters should use full-network models rather than equivalents once penetration exceeds moderate levels.
  • The method might extend to grids containing grid-forming inverters by adjusting the linearization step to account for different control modes.
  • Parameter regions identified this way could inform standardized tuning guidelines that account for multi-inverter interactions.

Load-bearing premise

Probabilistic support vector machine classification with adaptive sampling can accurately locate the true stability boundaries in high-dimensional controller-parameter space without missing unstable regions.

What would settle it

Direct eigenvalue analysis performed on a dense grid of points both inside and outside the approximated stability manifold to check whether any unstable points fall inside the manifold or stable points fall outside.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.26254 by Federico Silvestro, Fernando Mancilla-David, Francesco Conte, Samuele Grillo.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Dynamic circuit schematic of the two-level three-phase IBR considered [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Block diagram of a single VSI control scheme. In the figure, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Linearization tool, example of subsystems connection. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Layout of the modified Cigre European HV network. ´ VI. CASE STUDY The stability analysis approach presented in this study is carried out on the Cigre European HV transmission system ´ described in [17]. The network layout is illustrated in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Network scenarios: loads and shunt capacitors profiles. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Control parameters regions of practical interest (RPIs) (green) and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: ASM-based analysis over the PLL gains, IBR version with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Stability manifolds for PLL gains, IBR with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Stability manifolds for PLL gains, IBR with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Stability manifolds for current control gains, IBR with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Stability manifolds for v 2 dc control gains. VII. CONCLUSIONS This paper introduced the concept of stability manifolds and a practical methodology for their identification in power sys￾tems with high penetration of IBRs. The approach combines full-network linearization, multi-scenario eigenvalue analysis, and an ASM to efficiently map regions of the controller￾parameter space that guarantee small-signal … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

This paper proposes a systematic framework to assess the small-signal stability of power systems with high shares of grid-following inverter-based resources (IBRs) under varying controller parameters and operating conditions. Stability manifolds are introduced to identify controller-parameter regions that ensure stability across multiple scenarios. Full-network linearization and eigenvalue analysis are combined with adaptive sampling based on probabilistic support vector machine classification to approximate stability boundaries efficiently, while surrogate optimization identifies feasible initial controller settings meeting bandwidth and phase-margin constraints. The approach is validated on a modified Cigr\'e European HV network benchmark with 50 operating scenarios and increasing inverter penetration. Results show that stability sensitivity grows with inverter share, interactions among IBRs reshape admissible parameter regions, and simplified equivalent-network models may overlook critical system-level limitations. The framework supports stability-oriented controller design and interconnection studies in converter-dominated systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a framework to assess small-signal stability in power systems with high shares of grid-following IBRs by defining stability manifolds that delineate controller-parameter regions stable across multiple operating scenarios. It combines full-network linearization and eigenvalue analysis with probabilistic SVM-based adaptive sampling to approximate boundaries, uses surrogate optimization for feasible initial controller settings, and validates the approach on a modified Cigré European HV network benchmark across 50 scenarios with increasing inverter penetration. Key findings include growing stability sensitivity with IBR share, reshaping of admissible regions by IBR interactions, and limitations of simplified equivalent-network models.

Significance. If the sampling-based approximation of stability boundaries proves reliable, the work would offer a practical method for stability-oriented controller design and interconnection studies in converter-dominated systems, with the full-network analysis on a standard benchmark and multi-scenario validation providing concrete evidence of IBR interaction effects.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / framework description] Abstract / framework description: The central claim that stability manifolds correctly identify controller-parameter regions stable across the 50 scenarios rests on the probabilistic SVM adaptive sampling not missing unstable regions. No discussion or bound is provided on the risk of false-stable labels for narrow, high-codimension unstable filaments that can arise with growing IBR interactions, which directly undermines the reported growth in stability sensitivity and the conclusion that equivalent-network models overlook system-level limits.
  2. [Validation section] Validation section: The results assert that stability sensitivity grows with inverter share and IBR interactions reshape admissible regions, yet the manuscript supplies no quantitative validation metrics (e.g., classifier error rates on held-out points, estimated missed-volume bounds, or comparison against exhaustive low-dimensional sampling) to confirm that the adaptive sampling has not overlooked unstable pockets.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that surrogate optimization meets bandwidth and phase-margin constraints but does not indicate how these constraints are formulated or whether they are enforced inside or outside the stability-manifold computation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback. The concerns regarding potential limitations of the adaptive sampling approach are valid, and we will strengthen the manuscript by adding quantitative validation metrics and a discussion of sampling risks in the revision.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / framework description] Abstract / framework description: The central claim that stability manifolds correctly identify controller-parameter regions stable across the 50 scenarios rests on the probabilistic SVM adaptive sampling not missing unstable regions. No discussion or bound is provided on the risk of false-stable labels for narrow, high-codimension unstable filaments that can arise with growing IBR interactions, which directly undermines the reported growth in stability sensitivity and the conclusion that equivalent-network models overlook system-level limits.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the manuscript provides no explicit bounds or discussion on the risk of missing narrow, high-codimension unstable regions with the probabilistic SVM adaptive sampling. The method focuses sampling near the decision boundary, and application to the Cigré benchmark across 50 scenarios showed consistent results without evident missed instabilities. To address the concern directly, the revised manuscript will add a dedicated subsection on sampling reliability, including a discussion of limitations for high-codimension filaments and their potential impact on the reported sensitivity growth and equivalent-model conclusions. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Validation section] Validation section: The results assert that stability sensitivity grows with inverter share and IBR interactions reshape admissible regions, yet the manuscript supplies no quantitative validation metrics (e.g., classifier error rates on held-out points, estimated missed-volume bounds, or comparison against exhaustive low-dimensional sampling) to confirm that the adaptive sampling has not overlooked unstable pockets.

    Authors: We agree that the absence of quantitative metrics such as classifier error rates or missed-volume estimates leaves the validation open to the critique raised. The current results rely on the adaptive sampling outcomes and observed trends across scenarios. In the revision we will incorporate classifier precision/recall on held-out points collected during sampling, plus a comparison of manifold approximations against denser sampling in selected low-dimensional parameter projections, to provide concrete evidence that unstable pockets were not overlooked. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; standard methods applied without reduction to inputs

full rationale

The paper's framework uses full-network linearization, eigenvalue analysis, probabilistic SVM classification, and adaptive sampling to approximate stability manifolds in controller-parameter space. These are established techniques applied to the problem of IBR-dominated systems; no step equates a claimed prediction or manifold to a fitted quantity by construction, nor relies on self-citation chains or ansatzes smuggled from prior author work. The central results (growth of sensitivity with inverter share, reshaping of regions) follow from the numerical application rather than definitional equivalence. This is the expected non-finding for a computational study using off-the-shelf classification on linearized models.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The ledger records the new conceptual entity introduced and the standard domain assumption underlying the stability assessment; no free parameters are explicitly named in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Small-signal stability of the system can be determined from the eigenvalues of the linearized state-space model
    Invoked when the framework combines full-network linearization and eigenvalue analysis to assess stability.
invented entities (1)
  • stability manifolds no independent evidence
    purpose: To represent regions in controller-parameter space that guarantee stability across multiple operating scenarios
    New concept introduced to organize the stability assessment results

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5675 in / 1388 out tokens · 34905 ms · 2026-06-29T20:11:28.275731+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references

  1. [1]

    Def- inition and Classification of Power System Stability – Revisited & Extended,

    N. Hatziargyriou, J. Milanovic, C. Rahmann, V . Ajjarapu, C. Canizares, I. Erlich, D. Hill, I. Hiskens, I. Kamwa, B. Pal, P. Pourbeik, J. Sanchez- Gasca, A. Stankovic, T. Van Cutsem, V . Vittal, and C. V ournas, “Def- inition and Classification of Power System Stability – Revisited & Extended,”IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 3271–3281, 2021

    2021

  2. [2]

    Analysis of Dynamic Properties of VSCs Connected to Weak Grids Including the Effects of Dead Time and Time Delays,

    A. Rodr ´ıguez-Cabero, M. Prodanovic, and J. Rold ´an-Perez, “Analysis of Dynamic Properties of VSCs Connected to Weak Grids Including the Effects of Dead Time and Time Delays,”IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 1066–1075, 2019

    2019

  3. [3]

    Stability Analysis of Systems With High VSC Penetration: Where Is the Limit?

    C. Collados-Rodriguez, M. Cheah-Mane, E. Prieto-Araujo, and O. Gomis-Bellmunt, “Stability Analysis of Systems With High VSC Penetration: Where Is the Limit?”IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 2021–2031, 2020

    2021

  4. [4]

    Impacts of Phase-Locked Loop Dynamic on the Stability of DC-Link V oltage Control in V oltage Source Converter Integrated to Weak Grid,

    Y . Huang, L. Wang, S. Zhang, D. Wang, X. Deng, and G. Zhu, “Impacts of Phase-Locked Loop Dynamic on the Stability of DC-Link V oltage Control in V oltage Source Converter Integrated to Weak Grid,”IEEE Trans. Emerg. Sel. Topics Circuits Syst., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 48–58, 2022

    2022

  5. [5]

    Small-Signal Stability of Grid- Connected Converter System in Renewable Energy Systems with Fractional-Order Synchronous Reference Frame Phase-Locked Loop,

    P. Zhang, W. Du, and H. Wang, “Small-Signal Stability of Grid- Connected Converter System in Renewable Energy Systems with Fractional-Order Synchronous Reference Frame Phase-Locked Loop,” Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy, pp. 1–12, 2024

    2024

  6. [6]

    Factors affecting voltage stability while integrating inverter based renewable energy sources into weak power grids,

    M. I. Saleem, S. Saha, L. Ang, U. Izhar, and T. K. Roy, “Factors affecting voltage stability while integrating inverter based renewable energy sources into weak power grids,”IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 1216–1231, 2023

    2023

  7. [7]

    Stability assessment of inverter-based renewable energy sources integrated to weak grids,

    M. I. Saleem, S. Saha, U. Izhar, and L. Ang, “Stability assessment of inverter-based renewable energy sources integrated to weak grids,”IET Energy Systems Integration, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 525–544, 2024

    2024

  8. [8]

    Reduced- Order Modeling and Transient Stability Analysis of Grid-Connected VSC in DC-Link V oltage Control Timescale,

    Y . Ma, D. Zhu, J. Hu, D. Liu, X. Ji, X. Zou, and Y . Kang, “Reduced- Order Modeling and Transient Stability Analysis of Grid-Connected VSC in DC-Link V oltage Control Timescale,”IEEE Trans. Emerg. Sel. Topics Power Electron., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 2981–2993, 2024

    2024

  9. [9]

    Grid- forming inverters: A comparative study of different control strategies in frequency and time domains,

    N. Mohammed, H. Udawatte, W. Zhou, D. J. Hill, and B. Bahrani, “Grid- forming inverters: A comparative study of different control strategies in frequency and time domains,”IEEE Open J. Ind. Electron. Soc., vol. 5, pp. 185–214, 2024

    2024

  10. [10]

    Stability and operation limits of power systems with high penetration of power electronics,

    C. Collados-Rodriguez, M. Cheah-Mane, E. Prieto-Araujo, and O. Gomis-Bellmunt, “Stability and operation limits of power systems with high penetration of power electronics,”Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., vol. 138, p. 107728, 2022

    2022

  11. [11]

    Holistic small-signal stability analysis for large-scale inverter-intensive power systems with coupled and full-order dynamics from control systems and power networks,

    L. Ding, Y . Ouyang, X. Lu, J. Qin, S. Dong, A. Hoke, and J. Tan, “Holistic small-signal stability analysis for large-scale inverter-intensive power systems with coupled and full-order dynamics from control systems and power networks,”IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 1131–1147, 2025

    2025

  12. [12]

    Understanding the role of vsc control strategies in the limits of power electronics integration in ac grids using modal analysis,

    R. Mourouvin, J. C. Gonzalez-Torres, J. Dai, A. Benchaib, D. Georges, and S. Bacha, “Understanding the role of vsc control strategies in the limits of power electronics integration in ac grids using modal analysis,” Electr. Power Syst. Res., vol. 192, p. 106930, 2021

    2021

  13. [13]

    Power system stability with a high penetration of inverter-based resources,

    Y . Gu and T. C. Green, “Power system stability with a high penetration of inverter-based resources,”Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 111, no. 7, pp. 832–853, 2023

    2023

  14. [14]

    Revisiting small-signal modeling for analyzing fast dynamic interactions in converter-dominated power systems,

    F. Kelada, J. Buire, and N. HadjSaid, “Revisiting small-signal modeling for analyzing fast dynamic interactions in converter-dominated power systems,”IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 3819–3832, 2025

    2025

  15. [15]

    Efficient global optimiza- tion of expensive black-box functions,

    D. R. Jones, M. Schonlau, and W. J. Welch, “Efficient global optimiza- tion of expensive black-box functions,”J. Glob. Optim, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 455–492, 1998

    1998

  16. [16]

    [Online]

    MathWorks, Inc.,Surrogate Optimization Algorithm, 2025, accessed: 2025-05-21. [Online]. Available: https://www.mathworks.com/help/ gads/surrogateopt.html

    2025

  17. [17]

    Benchmark Systems for Network Integration of Renewable and Distributed Energy Resources,

    Cigr ´e WG C6.04, “Benchmark Systems for Network Integration of Renewable and Distributed Energy Resources,” Cigr´e, Tech. Rep., 2014

    2014

  18. [18]

    Detailed small–signal stability analysis of the cigr ´e high–voltage net- work penetrated by grid–following inverter–based resources,

    F. Conte, F. Mancilla-David, A. Sagar, C. Li, F. Silvestro, and S. Grillo, “Detailed small–signal stability analysis of the cigr ´e high–voltage net- work penetrated by grid–following inverter–based resources,” in2025 International Conference on Clean Electrical Power (ICCEP), 2025, pp. 1115–1121

    2025

  19. [19]

    Kundur,Power System Stability and Control

    P. Kundur,Power System Stability and Control. New York, NY , USA: McGraw-Hill, 1994

    1994

  20. [20]

    P. M. Anderson and A. A. Fouad,Power System Control and Stability, 2nd ed. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE Press, 2003

    2003

  21. [21]

    IEEE Recommended Practice for Excitation System Models for Power System Stability Studies,

    IEEE, “IEEE Recommended Practice for Excitation System Models for Power System Stability Studies,”IEEE Std 421.5-1992, pp. 1–56, 1992

    1992

  22. [22]

    Machowski, J

    J. Machowski, J. W. Bialek, and J. R. Bumby,Power System Dynamics: Stability and Control, 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, 2020

    2020

  23. [23]

    Power System Linearizaton Tool,

    SCooPS Project, “Power System Linearizaton Tool,” https://github.com/ grisamgit/SCooPS, 2026

    2026

  24. [24]

    Yazdani and R

    A. Yazdani and R. Iravani,Voltage-Sourced Converters in Power Sys- tems: Modeling, Control, and Applications. Hoboken, NJ: IEEE Press / Wiley, 2010

    2010

  25. [25]

    A phase tracking system for three phase utility interface inverters,

    S. Chung, “A phase tracking system for three phase utility interface inverters,”IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 431–438, 2000

    2000

  26. [26]

    Dynamic aggregate equivalent modeling of solar parks considering irradiation levels and fault scenar- ios,

    A. Mishra, A. S. Mir, and N. P. Padhy, “Dynamic aggregate equivalent modeling of solar parks considering irradiation levels and fault scenar- ios,”IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 7291–7302, 2024

    2024

  27. [27]

    Stability Analysis of Modern Power Systems,

    C. Collados-Rodr ´ıguez, “Stability Analysis of Modern Power Systems,” PhD thesis, Universitat Polit `ecnica de Catalunya (UPC), Departament d’Enginyeria El`ectrica, 2024

    2024

  28. [28]

    P. W. Sauer and M. A. Pai,Power System Dynamics and Stability. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 1998

    1998

  29. [29]

    [Online]

    MathWorks Ltd.,Steam Turbine and Governor, 2024, accessed: 2025-05-21. [Online]. Available: https://it.mathworks.com/help/releases/ R2024b/sps/powersys/ref/steamturbineandgovernor.html

    2024

  30. [30]

    Dynamic Models for Steam and Hydro Turbines in Power System Studies,

    I. C. Report, “Dynamic Models for Steam and Hydro Turbines in Power System Studies,”IEEE Trans. Power App. Syst., vol. PAS-92, no. 6, pp. 1904–1915, 1973

    1904

  31. [31]

    [Online]

    MathWorks Ltd.,Excitation System, 2024, accessed: 2025-05-21. [Online]. Available: https://it.mathworks.com/help/releases/R2024b/sps/ powersys/ref/excitationsystem.html

    2024

  32. [32]

    Cristianini and J

    N. Cristianini and J. Shawe-Taylor,An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other Kernel-Based Learning Methods. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2000

    2000

  33. [33]

    Teodorescu, M

    R. Teodorescu, M. Liserre, and P. Rodriguez,Grid Converters for Photovoltaic and Wind Power Systems. Chichester, UK: Wiley, 2011

    2011

  34. [34]

    Design and analysis of a current-controlled voltage- source converter with phase-locked loop,

    L. Harnefors, “Design and analysis of a current-controlled voltage- source converter with phase-locked loop,”IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 3472–3480, 2007

    2007

  35. [35]

    Yazdani and R

    A. Yazdani and R. Iravani,Voltage-Sourced Converters in Power Sys- tems: Modeling, Control, and Applications. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2010

    2010

  36. [36]

    Impedance modeling and analysis of grid- connected voltage-source converters,

    M. Cespedes and J. Sun, “Impedance modeling and analysis of grid- connected voltage-source converters,”IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 1254–1261, 2014

    2014

  37. [37]

    Passivity- based stability assessment of grid-connected vscs,

    L. Harnefors, X. Wang, A. G. Yepes, and F. Blaabjerg, “Passivity- based stability assessment of grid-connected vscs,”IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 30, no. 12, pp. 6401–6408, 2015

    2015

  38. [38]

    Design and control of an lcl- filter-based three-phase active rectifier,

    M. Liserre, F. Blaabjerg, and S. Hansen, “Design and control of an lcl- filter-based three-phase active rectifier,”IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 1281–1291, 2005

    2005

  39. [39]

    Power converters & cabinets,

    GamesaElectric, “Power converters & cabinets,” 2025, accessed: 2025- 05-23. [Online]. Available: https://www.gamesaelectric.com/products/

    2025