The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2605.28689 · v1 · pith:I5C6JCBJ · submitted 2026-05-27 · physics.optics

Isotropic fabrication of centimeter-scale, low propagation-loss periodically poled lithium niobate nanophotonic waveguides for efficient second harmonic generation

Guanghui Zhao , Yixuan Yang , Renhong Gao , Jintian Lin , Ya Cheng This is my paper

Reviewed by Pith2026-06-29 10:23 UTCgrok-4.3pith:I5C6JCBJopen to challenge →

classification physics.optics
keywords periodically poled lithium niobatenanophotonic waveguidessecond harmonic generationlow propagation lossisotropic etchingquasi-phase matchingfemtosecond laser fabrication
0
0 comments X

The pith

Domain inversion on a planar film before isotropic etching produces 1.2 cm PPLN waveguides with 0.042 dB/cm loss and 64 percent SHG efficiency.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that carrying out periodic domain inversion on a flat lithium niobate thin film, then defining the waveguide with isotropic chemo-mechanical etching, removes the electric-field distortion that previously limited poling uniformity in etched ridges. This sequence yields a uniform 50 percent duty cycle across a 1.2 cm length together with surface roughness of 0.34 nm, producing a record-low propagation loss of 0.042 dB/cm in the telecom band. The resulting device reaches a normalized second-harmonic-generation efficiency of 2021 percent per watt and an absolute conversion efficiency of 64 percent at 86 mW pump power. These numbers matter because they demonstrate that long, low-loss periodically poled nanophotonic waveguides can now be fabricated at the scale needed for practical integrated nonlinear optics.

Core claim

By inverting domains on a planar thin-film lithium niobate substrate prior to waveguide definition and then applying femtosecond-laser photolithography-assisted chemo-mechanical etching, the authors obtain a 1.2-cm-long periodically poled nanophotonic waveguide that maintains a 50 percent duty cycle, exhibits an average surface roughness of 0.34 nm, and achieves a propagation loss of 0.042 dB/cm together with a normalized quasi-phase-matched SHG conversion efficiency of 2021 percent per watt and 64 percent absolute efficiency at 86 mW pump power.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the reversal of fabrication order—domain inversion on the planar film before isotropic PLACE etching—which avoids field distortion during poling and produces uniform 50 percent duty cycle with smooth sidewalls.

If this is right

  • Centimeter-scale PPLN devices become practical for high-efficiency frequency conversion at modest optical powers.
  • The low propagation loss removes the previous limit on absolute conversion efficiency for single-period nanophotonic PPLN waveguides.
  • Uniform 50 percent duty cycle over long lengths supports precise quasi-phase-matching for narrow-linewidth nonlinear processes.
  • The isotropic etching step produces surfaces smooth enough to support further integration with other on-chip photonic components.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same ordering of steps could be tested on other ferroelectric thin films where post-etch poling has also been problematic.
  • If the process maintains uniformity across different poling periods, it would enable dispersion-engineered devices for broadband conversion.
  • The achieved smoothness and length scale suggest the waveguides could be co-integrated with low-loss linear routing sections on the same chip.

Load-bearing premise

The premise that domain inversion performed on the planar film experiences far less electric-field distortion than poling attempted after the waveguide ridge has already been etched.

What would settle it

A fabricated device showing duty-cycle deviation larger than a few percent from 50 percent or propagation loss above 0.1 dB/cm along the full 1.2 cm length would contradict the claim that the pre-etch poling plus isotropic etching sequence delivers the reported uniformity and loss.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.28689 by Guanghui Zhao, Jintian Lin, Renhong Gao, Ya Cheng, Yixuan Yang.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (a) Optical micrograph of the waveguide. (b) Cross-sectional SEM image. (c) AFM image, showing an RMS roughness of 0.34 nm. (d) Mode resonance of a racetrack microring resonator fabricated on the TFLN wafer by the same process, showing an intrinsic Q factor Qint of 7.98×106 , corresponding to a propagation loss of only 0.042 dB/cm [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (a) Simulated TE00-like fundamental and second-harmonic modes. (b) QPM period versus SiO2 cladding thickness. (c) QPM period versus pump wavelength for a 1.5-µm-thick cladding. (d) SH microscopy image of periodic domains over approximately 100 µm [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Experimental setup for SHG measurement. PC, polarization controller; EDFA, erbium-doped fiber amplifier; OSA, optical spectrum analyzer. Upper Inset: Optical microscope image of second harmonic emission from the output port the waveguide. Lower Inset: a photo of the waveguide under test, where PPLNOI denotes the periodically-poled-lithium-niobate-on-insulator chip [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Periodically poled lithium niobate (PPLN) nanophotonic waveguides that simultaneously feature low propagation-loss and uniform periodic poling are essential for a wide range of applications ranging from classical nonlinear frequency-conversion to scalable integrated quantum technology. However, fabrication imperfections have frequently limited the propagation loss of fully domain-inverted PPLN nanophotonic waveguides to a few dB/cm, primarily due to anisotropic etching issue, thereby restricting the absolute conversion efficiency and scale of photonic integration. Here, we present a fabrication approach that overcomes this challenge, yielding a 1.2-cm-long PPLN nanophotonic waveguide with low propagation loss via femtosecond-laser photolithography-assisted chemo-mechanical etching (PLACE). By carrying out domain inversion on a planar thin-film prior to waveguide definition, electric-field distortion is minimized during poling, while isotropic etching of the waveguide is achieved by PLACE with an average surface roughness of only 0.34 nm, resulting in uniform poling of duty cycle of 50% and a record-low propagation loss of 0.042 dB/cm in the telecom band. Under continuous-wave pumping at 1525 nm, the device demonstrates a high normalized quasi-phase-matched SHG conversion efficiency of 2021%/W, and an absolute conversion efficiency of 64% at a pump power of 86 mW which represents the state of the art for single-period PPLN nanophotonic waveguides.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript describes a fabrication process for 1.2-cm-long periodically poled lithium niobate (PPLN) nanophotonic waveguides that performs domain inversion on a planar thin film prior to waveguide definition via femtosecond-laser photolithography-assisted chemo-mechanical etching (PLACE). The authors claim this ordering minimizes electric-field distortion, yields uniform 50% duty-cycle poling, produces an average surface roughness of 0.34 nm, and results in a record-low propagation loss of 0.042 dB/cm together with normalized SHG efficiency of 2021 %/W and 64% absolute conversion efficiency at 86 mW pump power at 1525 nm.

Significance. If the reported loss and efficiency values are experimentally substantiated with the claimed uniformity, the work would constitute a meaningful advance for integrated nonlinear optics by enabling longer, lower-loss PPLN devices suitable for high-efficiency frequency conversion and quantum applications. The pre-poling plus isotropic-etch sequence directly targets a known fabrication bottleneck in thin-film PPLN.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central performance claims (0.042 dB/cm loss, 2021 %/W normalized efficiency, 64% absolute efficiency) are presented without any accompanying data, error bars, measurement protocols, or figure references. Because these numbers are the sole basis for the 'state of the art' assertion, their absence prevents assessment of whether the pre-etch poling step actually delivers the stated uniformity or performance.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the manuscript asserts that planar pre-poling 'enables uniform poling of duty cycle of 50%' and overcomes anisotropic-etch issues, yet supplies no quantitative metric (e.g., duty-cycle histogram, standard deviation over the 1.2 cm length, or side-by-side comparison with post-etch poling). This uniformity is load-bearing for both the low-loss and high-efficiency claims; without it the attribution to the fabrication sequence cannot be evaluated.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments and positive assessment of the work's significance. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central performance claims (0.042 dB/cm loss, 2021 %/W normalized efficiency, 64% absolute efficiency) are presented without any accompanying data, error bars, measurement protocols, or figure references. Because these numbers are the sole basis for the 'state of the art' assertion, their absence prevents assessment of whether the pre-etch poling step actually delivers the stated uniformity or performance.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract would be strengthened by explicit references to the supporting data. The detailed loss measurements (including error bars and protocols) appear in the propagation-loss section with associated figures, and the SHG efficiency data (with protocols) are in the nonlinear characterization section. In the revised manuscript we will update the abstract to include figure references and a brief note on the measurement methods. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the manuscript asserts that planar pre-poling 'enables uniform poling of duty cycle of 50%' and overcomes anisotropic-etch issues, yet supplies no quantitative metric (e.g., duty-cycle histogram, standard deviation over the 1.2 cm length, or side-by-side comparison with post-etch poling). This uniformity is load-bearing for both the low-loss and high-efficiency claims; without it the attribution to the fabrication sequence cannot be evaluated.

    Authors: The referee correctly notes that a statistical quantification of uniformity would better support the claims. While the manuscript presents SEM images showing the achieved 50% duty cycle, it does not include a histogram or standard deviation along the full length. We will add this analysis in the revised manuscript, reporting a duty-cycle histogram and standard deviation measured at multiple points along the 1.2 cm waveguide. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely experimental fabrication report with direct measurements

full rationale

The manuscript reports an experimental fabrication process (pre-etch planar poling followed by PLACE isotropic etching) and measured outcomes (0.042 dB/cm loss, 2021 %/W efficiency). No derivation chain, parameter fitting, predictions, or self-citation load-bearing steps exist. The abstract and text describe process ordering and resulting metrics without reducing any claim to a fitted input or prior self-citation by construction. This is a standard experimental paper whose central claims rest on fabricated devices and characterization data, not on any of the enumerated circularity patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Experimental fabrication paper; no mathematical free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced. Central claim rests entirely on physical measurements of surface roughness, poling uniformity, propagation loss, and conversion efficiency.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5812 in / 1088 out tokens · 29000 ms · 2026-06-29T10:23:07.654379+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references

  1. [1]

    Recent development in integrated Lithium niobate photonics,

    Z. Xie, F. Bo, J. Lin, H. Hu, X. Cai, X.-H. Tian, Z. Fang, J. Chen, M. Wang, F. Chen, Y. Cheng, J. Xu, S. Zhu, “Recent development in integrated Lithium niobate photonics, ” Adv. Phys. X 9, 2322739 (2024)

    2024

  2. [2]

    Ion-cut lithium niobate on insulator technology: recent advances and perspectives,

    Y. Jia, L. Wang, and F. Chen, “Ion-cut lithium niobate on insulator technology: recent advances and perspectives,” Appl. Phys. Rev. 8, 011307 (2021)

    2021

  3. [3]

    Advances in on-chip photonic devices based on lithium niobate on insulator,

    J. Lin, F. Bo, Y. Cheng, J. Xu, “Advances in on-chip photonic devices based on lithium niobate on insulator,” Photon. Res. 8, 1910–1936 (2020)

    1910

  4. [4]

    Advances in lithium niobate photonics: development status and perspectives,

    G. Chen, N. Li, J. D. Ng, H.-L. Lin, Y. Zhou, Y. H. Fu, L. Y. T. Lee, Y. Yu, A.- Q. Liu, A. J. Danner “Advances in lithium niobate photonics: development status and perspectives,” Adv. Photon. 4, 034003 (2022)

    2022

  5. [5]

    Nonlinear wave mixing in lithium niobate thin film,

    Y. Zheng, X. Chen, “Nonlinear wave mixing in lithium niobate thin film,” Adv. Phys. X 6, 1889402 (2021)

    2021

  6. [6]

    Lithium niobate microring with ultra-high Q factor above 108,

    R. Gao, N.Yao, J. Guan, L. Deng, J. Lin, M. Wang, L. Qiao, W. Fang, Y. Cheng, “Lithium niobate microring with ultra-high Q factor above 108,” Chin. Opt. Lett. 20, 011902 (2022)

    2022

  7. [7]

    Twenty-nine million intrinsic Q- factor monolithic microresonators on thin-film lithium niobate,

    X. Zhu, Y. Hu, S. Lu, H. K. Warner, X. Li, Y. Song, L. Magalhã es, A. Shams- Ansari, A. Cordaro, N. Sinclair, M. Lončar , “Twenty-nine million intrinsic Q- factor monolithic microresonators on thin-film lithium niobate,” Photon. Res. 12, A63–A68 (2024)

    2024

  8. [8]

    Ultra-high Q lithium niobate microring monolithically fabricated by photolithography assisted chemo-mechanical etching,

    C. Li, J. Guan, J. Lin, R. Gao, M. Wang, L. Qiao, L. Deng Y. Cheng, “Ultra-high Q lithium niobate microring monolithically fabricated by photolithography assisted chemo-mechanical etching,” Opt. Express 31, 31556–31562 (2023)

    2023

  9. [9]

    Integrated lithium niobate electro-optic modulators operating at CMOS-compatible voltages,

    C. Wang, M. Zhang, X. Chen, M. Bertrand, A. Shams-Ansari, S. Chandrasekhar, P. Winzer, M. Lončar , “Integrated lithium niobate electro-optic modulators operating at CMOS-compatible voltages,” Nature 562, 101–104 (2018)

    2018

  10. [10]

    High-performance hybrid 14 silicon and lithium niobate Mach–Zehnder modulators for 100 Gbit s−1 and beyond,

    He M, Xu M, Ren Y, J. Jian, Z. Ruan, Y. Xu, S. Gao, S. Sun, X. Wen, L. Zhou, L. Liu, C. Guo, H. Chen, S. Yu, L. Liu, X. Cai, “High-performance hybrid 14 silicon and lithium niobate Mach–Zehnder modulators for 100 Gbit s−1 and beyond,” Nat. Photonics 13, 359–364 (2019)

    2019

  11. [11]

    Self-starting bi-chromatic LiNbO3 soliton microcomb,

    Y. He, Q. F. Yang, J. Ling, R. Luo, H. Liang, M. Li, B. Shen, H. Wang, K. Vahala, Q. Lin, “Self-starting bi-chromatic LiNbO3 soliton microcomb,” Optica 6, 1138–1144 (2019)

    2019

  12. [12]

    Soliton microcomb generation by cavity polygon modes,

    B. Fu, R. Gao, N. Yao, H. Zhang, C. Li, J. Lin, M. Wang, L. Qiao, Y. Cheng, “Soliton microcomb generation by cavity polygon modes,” Opto-Electron. Adv. 7, 240061 (2024)

    2024

  13. [13]

    1550‐ nm band soliton microcombs in ytterbium‐doped lithium‐niobate microrings,

    C. Yang, S. Yang, F. Du, X. Zeng, B. Wang, Z. Yang, Q. Luo, R. Ma, R. Zhang, D. Jia, Z. Hao, Y. Li, Q. Yang, X. Yi, F. Bo, Y. Kong, G. Zhang, J. Xu, “1550‐ nm band soliton microcombs in ytterbium‐doped lithium‐niobate microrings,” Laser Photonics Rev. 17, 2200510 (2023)

    2023

  14. [14]

    Three- octave-spanning supercontinuum generation in z-cut quasi-phase matching thin- film lithium niobate,

    L. Peng, X. Li, L. Hong, B. Chen, Y. Zhao, X. Duan, H. Yu, Z. Li, “Three- octave-spanning supercontinuum generation in z-cut quasi-phase matching thin- film lithium niobate,” APL Photonics 10, 076122 (2025)

    2025

  15. [15]

    Advances in lithium niobate thin-film lasers and amplifiers: a review,

    Q. Luo, F. Bo, Y. Kong, G. Zhang, J. Xu, “Advances in lithium niobate thin-film lasers and amplifiers: a review,” Adv. Photonics 5, 034002–034002 (2023)

    2023

  16. [16]

    On-chip electro-optically tunable narrow linewidth Brillouin microlasers implemented in thin film lithium niobate,

    C. Li, J. Deng, X. Huang, X. Luo, R. Gao, H. Yu, J. Guan, J. B. Khurgin, Z. Li, J. Lin, Y. Cheng, “On-chip electro-optically tunable narrow linewidth Brillouin microlasers implemented in thin film lithium niobate,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 093801 (2026)

    2026

  17. [17]

    Integrated Pockels laser,

    M. Li, L. Chang, L. Wu, J. Staffa, J. Ling, U. A. Javid, S. Xue, Y. He, R. Lopez- rios, T. J. Morin, H. Wang, B. Shen, S. Zeng, L. Zhu, K. J. Vahala, J. E. Bowers, Q. Lin, “Integrated Pockels laser,” Nat. Commun., 13, 5344 (2022)

    2022

  18. [18]

    Broadband quasi-phase-matched harmonic generation in an on-chip monocrystalline lithium niobate microdisk resonator,

    J. Lin, N. Yao, Z. Hao, J. Zhang, W. Mao, M. Wang, W. Chu, R. Wu, Z. Fang, L. Qiao, W. Fang, F. Bo, Y. Cheng, “Broadband quasi-phase-matched harmonic generation in an on-chip monocrystalline lithium niobate microdisk resonator,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 173903 (2019)

    2019

  19. [19]

    Optimizing the efficiency of a periodically poled LNOI waveguide using in situ monitoring of the ferroelectric domains,

    Y. Niu, C. Lin, X. Liu, Y. Chen, X. Hu, Y. Zhang, X. Cai, Y.-X. Gong, Z. Xie, S. Zhu, “Optimizing the efficiency of a periodically poled LNOI waveguide using in situ monitoring of the ferroelectric domains,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 116, 101104 (2020)

    2020

  20. [20]

    Ultralow- threshold thin-film lithium niobate optical parametric oscillator,

    J. Lu, A. Al Sayem, Z. Gong, J. B. Surya, C.-L. Zou, H. X. Tang, “Ultralow- threshold thin-film lithium niobate optical parametric oscillator,” Optica 8, 539– 544 (2021)

    2021

  21. [21]

    Scalable, fiber-compatible lithium-niobate-on- insulator micro-waveguides for efficient nonlinear photonics,

    Y. Zhang, H. Li, T. Ding, Y. Huang, L. Liang, X. Sun, X. Sun, Y. Tang, J. Wang, S. Liu, Y. Zheng, X. Chen, “Scalable, fiber-compatible lithium-niobate-on- insulator micro-waveguides for efficient nonlinear photonics,” Optica 10, 688– 693

  22. [22]

    Efficient transverse multi-wave interactions up to six-wave mixing in a high-Q lithium niobate microresonator,

    C. Li, N. Yao, H. Yu, J. Lin, R. Gao, J. Deng, J. Guan, L. Qiao, Y. Cheng, “Efficient transverse multi-wave interactions up to six-wave mixing in a high-Q lithium niobate microresonator,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 213804 (2025). 15

    2025

  23. [23]

    Actively-monitored periodic-poling in thin-film lithium niobate photonic waveguides with ultrahigh nonlinear conversion efficiency of 4600% W−1 cm−2,

    A. Rao, K. Abdelsalam, T. Sjaardema, A. Honardoost, G. F. Camacho-Gonzalez, S. Fathpour, “Actively-monitored periodic-poling in thin-film lithium niobate photonic waveguides with ultrahigh nonlinear conversion efficiency of 4600% W−1 cm−2,” Opt. Express 27, 25920–25930 (2019)

    2019

  24. [24]

    Ultra-efficient frequency conversion in quasi-phase-matched lithium niobate microrings,

    J.-Y. Chen, Z.-H. Ma, Y. M. Sua, Z. Li, C. Tang, Y.-P. Huang, “ Ultra-efficient frequency conversion in quasi-phase-matched lithium niobate microrings,” Optica 6, 1244–1245 (2019)

    2019

  25. [25]

    Second-harmonic generation using d33 in periodically poled lithium niobate microdisk resonators,

    Z. Hao, L. Zhang, W. Mao, A. Gao, X. Gao, F. Gao, F. Bo, G. Zhang, J. Xu, “Second-harmonic generation using d33 in periodically poled lithium niobate microdisk resonators,” Photonics Res. 8, 311–317 (2020)

    2020

  26. [26]

    Ultrahigh-efficiency wavelength conversion in nanophotonic periodically poled lithium niobate waveguides,

    C Wang, C Langrock, A Marandi, M Jankowski, M. Zhang, B. Desiatov, M. M. Fejer, M. Lončar, “Ultrahigh-efficiency wavelength conversion in nanophotonic periodically poled lithium niobate waveguides,” Optica 5, 1438–1441 (2018)

    2018

  27. [27]

    High quality entangled photon pair generation in periodically poled thin-film lithium niobate waveguides,

    J. Zhao, C. Ma, M. Rü sing, S. Mookherjea, “High quality entangled photon pair generation in periodically poled thin-film lithium niobate waveguides,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 163603 (2020)

    2020

  28. [28]

    Ultrabroadband entangled photons on a nanophotonic chip,

    U. A. Javid, J. Ling, J. Staffa, M. Li, Y. He, Q. Lin, “Ultrabroadband entangled photons on a nanophotonic chip,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 183601 (2021)

    2021

  29. [29]

    Electrically pumped ultrabright entangled photons on chip,

    X.-F. Jiao, M.-Y. Zheng, Y.-H. Chen, B. Cao, X. Wang, Y. Liu, et al., “Electrically pumped ultrabright entangled photons on chip,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 250803 (2025)

    2025

  30. [30]

    Ultrabright multiplexed energy-time-entangled photon generation from lithium niobate on insulator chip,

    G.-T. Xue, Y.-F. Niu, X. Liu, J.-C. Duan, W. Chen, Y. Pan, K. Jia, X. Wang, H.- Y. Liu, Y. Zhang, P. Xu, G. Zhao, X. Cai, Y.-X. Gong, X. Hu, Z. Xie, S. Zhu, “Ultrabright multiplexed energy-time-entangled photon generation from lithium niobate on insulator chip,” Phys. Rev. Appl. 15, 064059 (2021)

    2021

  31. [31]

    Few-cycle vacuum squeezing in nanophotonics,

    R. Nehra, R. Sekine, L. Ledezma, Q. Guo, R. M. Gray, A. Roy, A. Marandi, “Few-cycle vacuum squeezing in nanophotonics,” Science 377, 1333–1337 (2022)

    2022

  32. [32]

    Toward 1% single-photon anharmonicity with periodically poled lithium niobate microring resonators,

    J. Lu, M. Li, C. L. Zou, A. A. Sayem, H. X. Tang, “Toward 1% single-photon anharmonicity with periodically poled lithium niobate microring resonators,” Optica 7, 1654–1659 (2020)

    2020

  33. [33]

    Photon-photon quantum phase gate in a photonic molecule with χ(2) nonlinearity,

    M. Li, Y. L. Zhang, H. X. Tang, C. Dong, G.-C. Guo, C.-L. Zou, “Photon-photon quantum phase gate in a photonic molecule with χ(2) nonlinearity, ” Phys. Rev. Appl. 13, 044013 (2020)

    2020

  34. [34]

    Deterministic N-photon state generation using lithium niobate on insulator device,

    H.-Y. Liu, M. Shang, X. Liu, Y. Wei, M. Mi, L. Zhang, Y.-X. Gong, Z. Xie, S. N. Zhu, “Deterministic N-photon state generation using lithium niobate on insulator device,” Adv. Photon. Nexus 2, 016003 (2023)

    2023

  35. [35]

    R. W. Boyd, Nonlinear Optics, 3rd ed. (Academic Press, New York, 2008), pp. 69–132

    2008

  36. [36]

    Y. Su, X. Zhang, H. Chen, S. Li, J. Ma, W. Li, Y. Niu, Q. Qin, S. Yang, Y. Deng, Y. Zhang, X. Hu, S. Zhu, “High-efficiency nonlinear frequency 16 conversion enabled by optimizing the ferroelectric domain structure in x-cut LNOI ridge waveguide,“ Nanophotonics 13, 3477–3488 (2024)

    2024

  37. [37]

    Wavelength-accurate and wafer-scale process for nonlinear frequency mixers in thin-film lithium niobate,

    C. J. Xin, S. Lu, J. Yang, A. Shams-Ansari, B. Desiatov, L. S. Magalhã es, S. S. Ghosh, E. McGee, D. Renaud, N. Achuthan, A. Zvyagintsev, D. Barton III, N. Sinclair, M. Lončar, “Wavelength-accurate and wafer-scale process for nonlinear frequency mixers in thin-film lithium niobate,” Commun. Phys. 8, 136 (2025)

    2025

  38. [38]

    Efficient photon-pair generation in layer-poled lithium niobate nanophotonic waveguides,

    X. Shi, S. S. Mohanraj, V. Dhyani, A. A. Baiju, S. Wang, J. Sun, L. Zhou, A. Paterova, V. Leong, D. Zhu, “Efficient photon-pair generation in layer-poled lithium niobate nanophotonic waveguides,” Light Sci. Appl. 13, 282 (2024)

    2024

  39. [39]

    Low-loss thin-film periodically poled lithium niobate waveguides fabricated by femtosecond laser photolithography,

    G. Zhao, J. Lin, R. Gao, J. Guan, C. Li, X. Zheng, M. Li, Q. Hou, X. Luo, Y. Qiu, L. Qiao, M. Wang, Y. Cheng, “Low-loss thin-film periodically poled lithium niobate waveguides fabricated by femtosecond laser photolithography,” Opt. Lett. 50, 4310–4313 (2025). 17 Figure 1. Fabrication process of the PPLN nanophotonic ridge waveguide. A Cr film is deposited...

    2025