pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.29431 · v1 · pith:M2RNGD4Bnew · submitted 2026-05-28 · 🧮 math.CO

Rowmotion on hook and two-row alt ν-Tamari lattices

classification 🧮 math.CO
keywords deltamathsfrowmotioncaselatticesorbithookincrement
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

In 2024, Ceballos and Chenevi{\`e}re introduced alt $\nu$-Tamari lattices, parameterized by a lattice path $\nu$ and an increment vector $\delta$, as a common generalization of $\nu$-Tamari and $\nu$-Dyck lattices. We study rowmotion on two families: the alt hook-Tamari lattice $\mathsf{H}_{\delta}(a,b)$ (where $\nu=EN^{a-1}E^{b-1}N$) and the alt $2$-row-Tamari lattice $\mathsf{T}_{\delta}(a,b)$ (where $\nu=E^aNE^bN$). We explicitly determine the orbit structures of $\mathsf{H}_{\delta}(a,b)$ and $\mathsf{T}_{\delta}(a,b)$ under rowmotion, and prove that their orbit structures are independent of the increment vector $\delta$. As a consequence, we show that rowmotion on $\mathsf{H}_{\delta}(a,b)$ exhibits the cyclic sieving phenomenon. We also compute orbit sums for several natural statistics. In the hook case, we evaluate the down-degree, peak, valley, and area statistics; in the $2$-row case, we focus on the down-degree statistic. All of these -- except for the area statistic -- are homometric under rowmotion. Regarding the methodology of this paper, our results in the hook case are obtained by applying a simple local modification to their Hasse diagrams. In the $2$-row case, we introduce a switching property for semidistributive lattices, which allows us to compare the orbit structures arising from different increment vectors.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.