pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.05638 · v1 · pith:C2MUWYEBnew · submitted 2026-06-04 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex

QCD Sum Rule Analysis of a Compact D⁺D⁻K⁺-Like Hidden-Charm Hexaquark with J^(P)=0⁻

Jing-Yi Yan , Wen-Shuai Zhang , Liang Tang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 01:01 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-ex
keywords hidden-charm hexaquarkQCD sum rulesinterpolating currentsexotic hadronsoperator product expansionBorel windowcontinuum thresholdcolor-octet clusters
0
0 comments X

The pith

QCD sum rules estimate the mass of a J^P=0- hidden-charm hexaquark at 3.94 to 4.41 GeV.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper applies QCD sum rules to a compact hexaquark configuration sharing the quark content of D+ D- K+. Six local interpolating currents with J^P=0- are built from three color-octet quark-antiquark clusters coupled to an overall singlet. Two-point correlation functions are computed with perturbative terms and nonperturbative condensates through dimension ten in the operator product expansion. Within Borel windows meeting standard criteria and with suitable continuum thresholds, the ground-state mass emerges in the interval 3.94-4.41 GeV. The result supplies a concrete mass window for experimental searches of this exotic state.

Core claim

Our analysis indicates that, within Borel windows satisfying standard sum rule criteria and with a reasonable choice of continuum threshold, the mass of the J^P=0− hidden-charm hexaquark state is estimated to be in the range 3.94--4.41 GeV.

What carries the argument

Six independent local interpolating currents with J^P=0- constructed from three color-octet quark-antiquark clusters.

If this is right

  • The mass range supplies a direct target for experimental identification of the hidden-charm hexaquark.
  • The state is predicted to appear as a compact configuration rather than a loosely bound molecular state.
  • Higher-dimensional condensates up to dimension ten are required to achieve stability in the sum-rule windows.
  • The same framework of three color-octet clusters can be extended to other hidden-charm hexaquark quantum numbers.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the state exists at this mass, it is likely to be produced and decay in channels involving D mesons and kaons.
  • The prediction could be cross-checked by lattice QCD calculations of the same six-quark operator.
  • Observation or non-observation would constrain models of few-body hadronic dynamics for the DDK system.

Load-bearing premise

The six chosen local interpolating currents actually couple strongly to a compact hexaquark ground state rather than to scattering states or other configurations, and the operator product expansion truncated at dimension ten plus the chosen Borel window reliably isolates that state.

What would settle it

A QCD sum rule analysis that yields no stable mass pole inside the 3.94-4.41 GeV window under the stated Borel and threshold conditions, or an experimental search that finds no resonance with these quantum numbers in that interval.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.05638 by Jing-Yi Yan, Liang Tang, Wen-Shuai Zhang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Shown here are the Feynman diagrams for the hexaquark s [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: The figures for current [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: The masses [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: The same caption as in Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: The same caption as in Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: The same caption as in Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: The same caption as in Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: The same caption as in Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: The same caption as in Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: The same caption as in Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11: The same caption as in Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12: The same caption as in Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13: The same caption as in Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_13.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In this work, we study a compact hexaquark configuration motivated by the same quark content as $D^{+} D^{-} K^+$ using QCD sum rules, where the $D D K$ system has been extensively studied within theoretical frameworks of few-body hadronic dynamics and coupled-channel interactions. The state is constructed from three color-octet quark--antiquark clusters coupled to an overall color singlet. We construct six independent local interpolating currents with the quantum numbers $J^{P}=0^{-}$ and analyze the corresponding two-point correlation functions. Both perturbative contributions and nonperturbative condensates up to dimension ten are included in the operator product expansion. Our analysis indicates that, within Borel windows satisfying standard sum rule criteria and with a reasonable choice of continuum threshold, the mass of the $J^{P}=0^{-}$ hidden-charm hexaquark state is estimated to be in the range $3.94$--$4.41~\mathrm{GeV}$. This prediction can provide a valuable theoretical reference for identifying such exotic hidden-charm hexaquark state in future experiments.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript applies QCD sum rules to six local interpolating currents for a compact hidden-charm hexaquark with J^P=0^- constructed from three color-octet quark-antiquark clusters. Including perturbative terms and condensates up to dimension 10 in the OPE, the authors identify Borel windows satisfying standard criteria and extract a mass in the interval 3.94-4.41 GeV for a reasonable choice of continuum threshold.

Significance. Should the central assumption hold—that the chosen currents have dominant overlap with a compact hexaquark ground state rather than DDK scattering states—the result would provide a useful benchmark for experimental searches of exotic hexaquarks in the hidden-charm sector. The use of multiple currents and high-dimensional condensates adds robustness to the OPE side.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the reported mass interval 3.94--4.41 GeV spans 0.47 GeV and overlaps the D^+D^-K^+ threshold near 4.2 GeV; this breadth shows that the extracted mass depends sensitively on the adjusted values of the continuum threshold s_0 and Borel mass M^2, both free parameters whose specific choices directly determine the numerical result.
  2. [Abstract] The analysis assumes the six J^P=0^- currents couple dominantly to a single compact hexaquark pole, yet the same currents create three-meson scattering states whose thresholds lie inside the quoted window; standard sum-rule criteria (pole dominance, OPE convergence to dim 10) do not automatically suppress multi-particle cuts, and no explicit check of the residue against threshold behavior is provided.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of the manuscript and the constructive comments. We respond to each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the reported mass interval 3.94--4.41 GeV spans 0.47 GeV and overlaps the D^+D^-K^+ threshold near 4.2 GeV; this breadth shows that the extracted mass depends sensitively on the adjusted values of the continuum threshold s_0 and Borel mass M^2, both free parameters whose specific choices directly determine the numerical result.

    Authors: The quoted interval is obtained by collecting the central mass values extracted from the six independent interpolating currents, each analyzed in its own Borel window with a continuum threshold s_0 chosen so that the pole contribution is at least 50% and the dimension-10 OPE converges. Within each individual window the extracted mass is stable against moderate variations of M^2, as required by the standard sum-rule criteria. The spread therefore reflects the variation across different current choices rather than an uncontrolled sensitivity. We will revise the abstract to state this explicitly and to note the proximity of the predicted window to the D^+D^-K^+ threshold. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] The analysis assumes the six J^P=0^- currents couple dominantly to a single compact hexaquark pole, yet the same currents create three-meson scattering states whose thresholds lie inside the quoted window; standard sum-rule criteria (pole dominance, OPE convergence to dim 10) do not automatically suppress multi-particle cuts, and no explicit check of the residue against threshold behavior is provided.

    Authors: We agree that local interpolating currents can couple to both compact multiquark configurations and to multi-meson scattering states, and that the usual Borel-window criteria do not automatically eliminate the latter. The present analysis is performed under the working assumption of dominant overlap with a compact state, motivated by the color-octet cluster construction of the currents. An explicit decomposition of the spectral density into compact-pole and scattering contributions lies outside the scope of a standard QCD sum-rule study and would require additional techniques. We will add a brief remark in the manuscript acknowledging this inherent limitation of the method. revision: partial

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Mass estimate depends on chosen continuum threshold and Borel window

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Abstract]
    "within Borel windows satisfying standard sum rule criteria and with a reasonable choice of continuum threshold, the mass of the J^{P}=0^{-} hidden-charm hexaquark state is estimated to be in the range 3.94--4.41 GeV. This prediction can provide a valuable theoretical reference"

    The mass range is produced only after the continuum threshold is chosen 'reasonably' and Borel windows are selected to satisfy the sum-rule criteria; the extracted mass is therefore determined by these adjustable inputs rather than being fixed by the OPE side without such choices.

full rationale

The derivation uses standard QCD sum-rule machinery: the two-point correlator is computed via OPE (perturbative + condensates to dim-10), Borel-transformed, and matched to a phenomenological pole plus continuum. The mass is then extracted from the ratio of moments after selecting a Borel window (for OPE convergence and pole dominance) and a continuum threshold s0. The quoted range 3.94-4.41 GeV is obtained precisely by varying these inputs within 'reasonable' values that satisfy the criteria; the numerical output is therefore a function of the chosen s0 and window rather than a parameter-free result from the OPE alone. This matches the fitted-input-called-prediction pattern. No self-citation, self-definitional, or uniqueness-theorem steps appear in the supplied text, and the central OPE calculation itself remains independent content. The physical assumption that the currents couple dominantly to a compact hexaquark (rather than DDK scattering states) is a modeling choice, not a circular reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The mass extraction rests on standard QCD sum-rule machinery plus choices for the continuum threshold and Borel window; the hexaquark itself is introduced as a compact configuration without independent experimental evidence.

free parameters (2)
  • continuum threshold s0
    Chosen reasonably to suppress higher states; directly affects the mass window extracted from the sum rule.
  • Borel mass M^2
    Window selected to satisfy standard sum-rule criteria of pole dominance and OPE convergence.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The operator product expansion of the correlation function is valid and can be truncated at dimension ten
    Invoked when including perturbative and condensate contributions up to dim 10.
  • domain assumption The local interpolating currents couple to the desired compact hexaquark state
    Assumed when constructing the six currents with J^P=0-.
invented entities (1)
  • compact D+D-K+ like hidden-charm hexaquark no independent evidence
    purpose: To model the exotic six-quark bound state with the given quark content and quantum numbers
    Postulated configuration; no independent experimental evidence supplied in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5732 in / 1609 out tokens · 49301 ms · 2026-06-28T01:01:11.723572+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages · 24 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    are displayed in Fig. 1. On the phenomenological side, after isolating the ground-s tate contribution of the hex- aquark state, the phenomenological representation of the c orrelation function Π i(q2) can be 6 FIG. 1: Shown here are the Feynman diagrams for the hexaquark s tate with three color-octet clusters, where only representative topologies are disp...

  2. [2]

    A Schematic Model of Baryons and Mesons,

    M. Gell-Mann, “A Schematic Model of Baryons and Mesons,” Phys. Lett. 8, 214–215 (1964) 10.1016/S0031-9163(64)92001-3

    work page doi:10.1016/s0031-9163(64)92001-3 1964

  3. [3]

    An SU(3) model for strong interaction symmetry and its breaking. Version 1,

    G. Zweig, “An SU(3) model for strong interaction symmetry and its breaking. Version 1,” CERN- TH-401

  4. [4]

    Perhaps a Stable Dihyperon,

    R. L. Jaffe, “Perhaps a Stable Dihyperon,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 195–198 (1977) [erratum: Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 617 (1977)] 10.1103/PhysRevLett.38.195

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.38.195 1977

  5. [5]

    Heavy-Quark QCD Exotica

    R. F. Lebed, R. E. Mitchell and E. S. Swanson, “Heavy-Quark QC D Exotica,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 93, 143–194 (2017) 10.1016/j.ppnp.2016.11.003 [arXiv:1610.04528 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2016.11.003 2017

  6. [6]

    The hidden-charm pentaquark and tetraquark states

    H. X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu and S. L. Zhu, “The hidden-charm pen taquark and tetraquark states,” Phys. Rept. 639, 1–121 (2016) 10.1016/j.physrep.2016.05.004 [arXiv:1601.02092 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2016.05.004 2016

  7. [7]

    Evidence for a New Resonance from Polarized Neutron-Proton Scattering

    P. Adlarson et al. [W ASA-at-COSY], “Evidence for a New Resonance from Polarized Neu tron- Proton Scattering,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 202301 (2014) 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.202301 [arXiv:1402.6844 [nucl-ex]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.112.202301 2014

  8. [8]

    Observation of a narrow charmonium-like state in exclusive B+ -> K+ pi+pi- J/psi decays

    S. K. Choi et al. [Belle], “Observation of a narrow charmonium-like state in exclusive B± → K ±π +π −J/ψ decays,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 262001 (2003) 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.262001 [arXiv:hep-ex/0309032 [hep-ex]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.91.262001 2003

  9. [9]

    Evidence for exotic hadron contributions to $\Lambda_b^0 \to J/\psi p \pi^-$ decays

    R. Aaij et al. [LHCb], “Evidence for exotic hadron contributions to Λ 0 b → J/ψpπ − decays,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 082003 (2016) 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.082003 [arXiv:1606.06999 [hep-ex]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.082003 2016

  10. [10]

    Observation of a narrow pentaquark state, $P_c(4312)^+$, and of two-peak structure of the $P_c(4450)^+$

    R. Aaij et al. [LHCb], “Observation of a narrow pentaquark state, Pc(4312)+, and of two-peak structure of the Pc(4450)+,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 222001 (2019) 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.222001 [arXiv:1904.03947 [hep-ex]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.222001 2019

  11. [11]

    Exotics: Heavy Pentaquarks and Tetraquarks

    A. Ali, J. S. Lange and S. Stone, “Exotics: Heavy Pentaquarks and Tetraquarks,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 97, 123–198 (2017) 10.1016/j.ppnp.2017.08.003 [arXiv:1706.00610 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2017.08.003 2017

  12. [12]

    Multiquark Resonances

    A. Esposito, A. Pilloni and A. D. Polosa, “Multiquark Resonances ,” Phys. Rept. 668, 1–97 (2017) 10.1016/j.physrep.2016.11.002 [arXiv:1611.07920 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2016.11.002 2017

  13. [13]

    Exotic hadrons: review and perspectives

    J. M. Richard, “Exotic hadrons: review and perspectives,” Few Body Syst. 57, 1185–1212 (2016) 10.1007/s00601-016-1159-0 [arXiv:1606.08593 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s00601-016-1159-0 2016

  14. [14]

    Pentaquark and Tetraquark states

    Y. R. Liu, H. X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu and S. L. Zhu, “Pentaquar k and Tetraquark states,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 107, 237–320 (2019) 10.1016/j.ppnp.2019.04.003 [arXiv:1903.11976 [hep-ph]]. 19

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2019.04.003 2019

  15. [15]

    Observation of a charged charmoniumlike structure in e+e- to pi+pi-J/psi at \sqrt{s}=4.26 GeV

    M. Ablikim et al. [BESIII], “Observation of a Charged Charmoniumlike Structure in e+e− → π +π − J/ψ at √ s = 4 . 26 GeV,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 252001 (2013) 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.252001 [arXiv:1303.5949 [hep-ex]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.110.252001 2013

  16. [16]

    The XYZ states: experimental and theoretical status and perspectives ,

    N. Brambilla, S. Eidelman, C. Hanhart, A. Nefediev, C. P. Shen, C . E. Thomas, A. Vairo and C. Z. Yuan, “The XYZ states: experimental and theoretical status and perspectives ,” Phys. Rept. 873, 1–154 (2020) 10.1016/j.physrep.2020.05.001 [arXiv:1907.07583 [hep-ex]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2020.05.001 2020

  17. [17]

    Analysis of the hidden-charm tetraquark mass sp ectrum with the QCD sum rules,

    Z. G. Wang, “Analysis of the hidden-charm tetraquark mass sp ectrum with the QCD sum rules,” Phys. Rev. D 102, 014018 (2020) 10.1103/PhysRevD.102.014018 [arXiv:1908.07914 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.014018 2020

  18. [18]

    Hadronic molecules

    F. K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U. G. Meißner, Q. Wang, Q. Zhao and B. S . Zou, “Hadronic molecules,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015004 (2018) 10.1103/RevModPhys.90.015004 [arXiv:1705.00141 [hep- ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/revmodphys.90.015004 2018

  19. [19]

    Heavy quark spin selection rule and the properties of the X(3872)

    M. B. Voloshin, “Heavy quark spin selection rule and the propert ies of the X(3872),” Phys. Lett. B 604, 69–73 (2004) 10.1016/j.physletb.2004.11.003 [arXiv:hep-ph/0408321 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2004.11.003 2004

  20. [20]

    Isospin breaking of the narrow charmonium s tate of Belle at 3872 MeV as a deuson,

    N. A. Tornqvist, “Isospin breaking of the narrow charmonium s tate of Belle at 3872 MeV as a deuson,” Phys. Lett. B 590, 209–215 (2004) 10.1016/j.physletb.2004.03.077 [arXiv:hep- ph/0402237 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2004.03.077 2004

  21. [21]

    Diquark-Antidiquarks with Hidden or Open Charm and the Nature of X(3872)

    L. Maiani, F. Piccinini, A. D. Polosa and V. Riquer, “Diquark-antidiq uarks with hid- den or open charm and the nature of X(3872),” Phys. Rev. D 71, 014028 (2005) 10.1103/PhysRevD.71.014028 [arXiv:hep-ph/0412098 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.71.014028 2005

  22. [22]

    Analysis of the X(3872), Z_c(3900) and Z_c(3885) as axial-vector tetraquark states with QCD sum rules

    Z. G. Wang and T. Huang, “Analysis of the X(3872), Zc(3900) and Zc(3885) as axial-vector tetraquark states with QCD sum rules,” Phys. Rev. D 89, 054019 (2014) 10.1103/PhysRevD.89.054019 [arXiv:1310.2422 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.89.054019 2014

  23. [23]

    How to reveal the exotic nature of the P_c(4450)

    F. K. Guo, U. G. Meißner, W. Wang and Z. Yang, “How to reveal t he exotic nature of the Pc(4450),” Phys. Rev. D 92, 071502 (2015) 10.1103/PhysRevD.92.071502 [arXiv:1507.04950 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.92.071502 2015

  24. [24]

    Triangle Singularities and XYZ Quarkonium Peaks

    A. P. Szczepaniak, “Triangle Singularities and XYZ Quarkonium Pe aks,” Phys. Lett. B 747, 410–416 (2015) 10.1016/j.physletb.2015.06.029 [arXiv:1501.01691 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2015.06.029 2015

  25. [25]

    Analysis of the scalar doubly charmed hexaquark state with QCD sum rules

    Z. G. Wang, “Analysis of the scalar doubly charmed hexaquark s tate with QCD sum rules,” Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 642 (2017), doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5207-9 [arXiv:1707.09767 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5207-9 2017

  26. [26]

    Study of Λ cΛ c dibaryon and Λ c ¯Λ c baryonium states via QCD sum rules,

    X. W. Wang, Z. G. Wang, and G. L. Yu, “Study of Λ cΛ c dibaryon and Λ c ¯Λ c baryonium states via QCD sum rules,” Eur. Phys. J. A 57, 275 (2021), doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-021-00576-8 [arXiv:2107.04751 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-021-00576-8 2021

  27. [27]

    Hidden-bottom and -charm hexaquark states in QCD sum rules,

    B. D. Wan, L. Tang, and C. F. Qiao, “Hidden-bottom and -charm hexaquark states in QCD sum rules,” Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 121 (2020), doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-7701-8 [arXiv:1912.12046 20 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-7701-8 2020

  28. [28]

    Mass spectra of Λ Q ¯Σ Q hexaquark states in QCD sum rules,

    X. H. Zhang and C. F. Qiao, “Mass spectra of Λ Q ¯Σ Q hexaquark states in QCD sum rules,” arXiv:2512.22019 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  29. [29]

    Mass spectra of 0 −− and 0 +− hidden-heavy baryoniums,

    B. D. Wan, “Mass spectra of 0 −− and 0 +− hidden-heavy baryoniums,” Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 760 (2024), doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13126-5 [arXiv:2311.13161 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13126-5 2024

  30. [30]

    Search for the Λ cΣ c and ¯Λ cΣ c dibaryon structures via the QCD sum rules,

    X. W. Wang, Z. G. Wang, and G. L. Yu, “Search for the Λ cΣ c and ¯Λ cΣ c dibaryon structures via the QCD sum rules,” arXiv:2604.14597 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  31. [31]

    Searching for hidden-charm baryonium signals in QCD sum rules

    H. X. Chen, D. Zhou, W. Chen, X. Liu, and S. L. Zhu, “Searching for hidden-charm baryonium signals in QCD sum rules,” Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 602 (2016), doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4459-0 [arXiv:1605.07453 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4459-0 2016

  32. [32]

    Search for the charmed baryonium and dibaryon structures via the QCD sum rules,

    X. W. Wang and Z. G. Wang, “Search for the charmed baryonium and dibaryon structures via the QCD sum rules,” Adv. High Energy Phys. 2022, 6224597 (2022), doi:10.1155/2022/6224597 [arXiv:2110.14133 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1155/2022/6224597 2022

  33. [33]

    Bound state formation in the $DDK$ system

    A. Martinez Torres, K. P. Khemchandani and L. S. Geng, “Bou nd state formation in the DDK system,” Phys. Rev. D 99, 076017 (2019) 10.1103/PhysRevD.99.076017 [arXiv:1809.01059 [hep- ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.99.076017 2019

  34. [34]

    Excited K meson, Kc(4180), with hidden charm as a ¯D ¯DK bound state,

    T. W. Wu, M. Z. Liu and L. S. Geng, “Excited K meson, Kc(4180), with hidden charm as a ¯D ¯DK bound state,” Phys. Rev. D 103, L031501 (2021) 10.1103/PhysRevD.103.L031501 [arXiv:2102.08109 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.l031501 2021

  35. [35]

    DK , DDK , and DDDK molecules—understanding the nature of the D∗ s0(2317),

    T. W. Wu, M. Z. Liu, L. S. Geng, E. Hiyama and M. P. Valderrama, “ DK , DDK , and DDDK molecules—understanding the nature of the D∗ s0(2317),” Phys. Rev. D 100, 034029 (2019) 10.1103/PhysRevD.100.034029 [arXiv:1906.11995 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.034029 2019

  36. [36]

    Implication of the Existence o fJ P C = 0 −− ¯DsDK Bound State on the Nature of D∗ s0(2317), and a New Configuration of Exotic State,

    T. W. Wu, M. Z. Liu and L. S. Geng, “Implication of the Existence o fJ P C = 0 −− ¯DsDK Bound State on the Nature of D∗ s0(2317), and a New Configuration of Exotic State,” Phys. Rev. Lett . 135, 031902 (2025) 10.1103/3gbb-ms8c [arXiv:2501.11358 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1103/3gbb-ms8c 2025

  37. [37]

    Strong decays of the explicitly exotic doubly charmed DDK bound state,

    Y. Huang, M. Z. Liu, Y. W. Pan, L. S. Geng, A. Mart ´ ınez Torres and K. P. Khemchandani, “Strong decays of the explicitly exotic doubly charmed DDK bound state,” Phys. Rev. D 101, 014022 (2020) 10.1103/PhysRevD.101.014022 [arXiv:1909.09021 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.101.014022 2020

  38. [38]

    Binding of the three- hadron DD∗K system from the lattice effective field theory,

    Z. Zhang, X. Y. Hu, G. He, J. Liu, J. A. Shi, B. N. Lu and Q. Wang, “Binding of the three- hadron DD∗K system from the lattice effective field theory,” Phys. Rev. D 111, 036002 (2025) 10.1103/PhysRevD.111.036002 [arXiv:2409.01325 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.111.036002 2025

  39. [39]

    QCD and Re sonance Physics. Theoretical Foundations,

    M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein and V. I. Zakharov, “QCD and Re sonance Physics. Theoretical Foundations,” Nucl. Phys. B 147, 385–447 (1979) 10.1016/0550-3213(79)90022-1

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(79)90022-1 1979

  40. [40]

    QCD and Re sonance Physics: Applica- 21 tions,

    M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein and V. I. Zakharov, “QCD and Re sonance Physics: Applica- 21 tions,” Nucl. Phys. B 147, 448–518 (1979) 10.1016/0550-3213(79)90023-3

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(79)90023-3 1979

  41. [41]

    Hadron Propertie s from QCD Sum Rules,

    L. J. Reinders, H. Rubinstein and S. Yazaki, “Hadron Propertie s from QCD Sum Rules,” Phys. Rept. 127, 1 (1985) 10.1016/0370-1573(85)90065-1

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-1573(85)90065-1 1985

  42. [42]

    Charmonium Exotic States,

    R. M. Albuquerque, “Charmonium Exotic States,” arXiv:1306.467 1 [hep-ph]

  43. [43]

    Hybrid Quarkonia From QCD Sum Rules,

    J. Govaerts, L. J. Reinders, H. R. Rubinstein and J. Weyers, “ Hybrid Quarkonia From QCD Sum Rules,” Nucl. Phys. B 258, 215–229 (1985) 10.1016/0550-3213(85)90609-1

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(85)90609-1 1985

  44. [44]

    QCD Sum Rules, a Modern Perspective

    P. Colangelo and A. Khodjamirian, “QCD Sum Rules, a Modern Pers pective,” in At the Frontier of Particle Physics / Handbook of QCD , edited by M. Shifman (World Scientific, Singapore, 2001), Vol. 3, pp. 1495–1576 10.1142/9789812810458_0033 [arXiv:hep-ph/0010175]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1142/9789812810458_0033 2001

  45. [45]

    QCD sum rules, a modern pers pective,

    P. Colangelo and A. Khodjamirian, “QCD sum rules, a modern pers pective,” arXiv:hep- ph/0010175 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  46. [46]

    QCD spectral sum rules,

    S. Narison, “QCD spectral sum rules,” World Sci. Lect. Notes Ph ys. 26, 1–527 (1989) 10.1142/9789812799265

    work page doi:10.1142/9789812799265 1989

  47. [47]

    Review of Particle Physics,

    R. L. Workman et al. [Particle Data Group], “Review of Particle Physics,” PTEP 2022, 083C01 (2022) 10.1093/ptep/ptac097

    work page doi:10.1093/ptep/ptac097 2022

  48. [48]

    Baryons and baryoniums in the pers pective of QCD sum rules,

    S. Q. Zhang and C. F. Qiao, “Baryons and baryoniums in the pers pective of QCD sum rules,” arXiv:2512.24706 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  49. [49]

    QCD sum rule calculation for the charmonium-like structures in the J/psi phi and J/psi omega invariant mass spectra

    S. I. Finazzo, M. Nielsen and X. Liu, “QCD sum rule calculation for t he charmonium-like structures in the J/ψφ and J/ψω invariant mass spectra,” Phys. Lett. B 701, 101–106 (2011) 10.1016/j.physletb.2011.05.042 [arXiv:1102.2347 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2011.05.042 2011

  50. [50]

    Estimating the mass of the hidden charm $1^+(1^{+})$ tetraquark state via QCD sum rules

    C. F. Qiao and L. Tang, “Estimating the mass of the hidden charm 1+(1+) tetraquark state via QCD sum rules,” Eur. Phys. J. C 74, 3122 (2014) 10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-3122-x [arXiv:1307.6654 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-3122-x 2014

  51. [51]

    Interpretation of $Z_c(4025)$ as the Hidden Charm Tetraquark States via QCD Sum Rules

    C. F. Qiao and L. Tang, “Interpretation of Zc(4025) as the hidden charm tetraquark states via QCD Sum Rules,” Eur. Phys. J. C 74, 2810 (2014) 10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-2810-x [arXiv:1308.3439 [hep-ph]]. 22 Appendix: Spectral density for the current j1 For completeness, we present in this appendix the spectral d ensity ρOPE 1 (s) entering Eq. (

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-2810-x 2014

  52. [52]

    for the current j1 defined in Eq. ( 2). This expression is given as a representa- tive example; the spectral densities for the other currents have analogous structures and are not displayed explicitly for brevity. The full spectral den sity is decomposed as ρOPE 1 (s) = ρpert 1 (s) +ρ(3) 1 (s) +ρ(4) 1 (s) + · · ·+ρ(10) 1 (s). (30) The short-hand notations ...