pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.05656 · v2 · pith:KTDAG2HFnew · submitted 2026-06-04 · ✦ hep-th · math-ph· math.DG· math.MP

On Quantum Aspects of 1-Form Symmetries I: BV-BRST Cohomology and Anomaly Polynomials

Weizhen Jia , Yi-Nan Wang , Yi Zhang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 11:11 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th math-phmath.DGmath.MP
keywords U(1) gerbe1-form symmetryBV-BRST cohomologyanomaly polynomialsČech-de Rham bicomplexLie 2-algebroidCourant algebroid2-form gauge field
0
0 comments X

The pith

Local Čech data of a U(1) gerbe directly encodes the BV-BRST complex for 2-form gauge fields and supplies a setting for anomaly descent of 1-form symmetries.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs the infinitesimal symmetry structure of a U(1) 2-form gauge field as a Lie 2-algebroid directly from the local Čech data of the describing gerbe. Paired with the associated exact Courant algebroid, this yields the full BV-BRST complex, with the field-ghost tower and the higher Russian formula arising from the gerbe's connective structure, curving, and 3-form curvature. The resulting Čech-de Rham bicomplex then serves as the natural arena for anomaly descent equations of U(1) 1-form symmetries. The construction is verified through explicit examples in Maxwell theory.

Core claim

Starting from the local Čech data of the U(1) gerbe, the infinitesimal symmetry structure is constructed as a Lie 2-algebroid. Together with the associated exact Courant algebroid, this provides a geometric framework for the BV-BRST complex of the higher-form gauge theory. The field-ghost tower is encoded in the local gerbe data, and the higher Russian formula arises naturally from the relations among the connective structure, the curving, and the 3-form curvature. This setup yields the Čech-de Rham bicomplex as a natural setting for anomaly descent for U(1) 1-form symmetries.

What carries the argument

Lie 2-algebroid constructed from the local Čech data of the U(1) gerbe, which encodes the field-ghost tower and supports the Čech-de Rham bicomplex for anomaly descent.

Load-bearing premise

The local Čech data of the gerbe together with its connective structure and curving directly encodes the full field-ghost tower of the BV-BRST complex without additional choices.

What would settle it

An explicit computation in Maxwell theory in which the Čech-de Rham bicomplex fails to reproduce the standard anomaly descent equations or polynomials for the U(1) 1-form symmetry would falsify the claim that the bicomplex provides a natural setting.

read the original abstract

We investigate the quantum aspects of gauging continuous 1-form global symmetries. In this paper, we study the BV-BRST quantization of a $U(1)$ 2-form gauge field, described geometrically by a $U(1)$ gerbe. Starting from the local \v{C}ech data of the gerbe, we construct the corresponding infinitesimal symmetry structure in terms of a Lie 2-algebroid, and show that, together with the associated exact Courant algebroid, it provides a natural geometric framework for the BV-BRST complex of this higher-form gauge theory. In this formulation, the field-ghost tower is encoded directly in the local gerbe data, and the higher Russian formula arises naturally from the relations among the connective structure, the curving, and the 3-form curvature. We further show that the resulting \v{C}ech-de Rham bicomplex provides a natural setting for anomaly descent for $U(1)$ 1-form symmetries, and illustrate the construction with explicit examples in Maxwell theory.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that the local Čech data of a U(1) gerbe, together with its connective structure and curving, directly encodes the field-ghost tower and BRST differential of the BV-BRST complex for the associated 2-form gauge theory via an associated Lie 2-algebroid and exact Courant algebroid. The higher Russian formula is said to arise naturally from the gerbe relations, and the resulting Čech-de Rham bicomplex furnishes a natural setting for anomaly descent of U(1) 1-form symmetries, illustrated with examples in Maxwell theory.

Significance. If the identification is canonical and free of auxiliary choices, the work supplies a geometric unification of gerbe cohomology with BV-BRST quantization for higher-form gauge theories and a concrete framework for anomaly polynomials of 1-form symmetries. The explicit Maxwell examples provide a falsifiable test of the descent procedure.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract, §3] Abstract and §3 (Lie 2-algebroid construction): the central claim that the Čech cocycle data plus connective/curving structure 'directly supplies' the full field-ghost tower and BRST differential without auxiliary choices is load-bearing. The paper does not exhibit an explicit uniqueness argument showing that the algebroid bracket and higher Russian formula relations are fixed solely by the gerbe data; if additional structure is implicitly chosen, the asserted naturality of the Čech-de Rham bicomplex for anomaly descent is weakened.
  2. [§4] §4 (Courant algebroid and BV complex): the identification of the exact Courant algebroid with the standard BV-BRST complex for the 2-form gauge field is asserted but not shown to be the unique extension compatible with the gerbe curvature; a concrete check that the ghost number assignments and differential match the conventional tower (without extra data) is required to support the claim.
minor comments (2)
  1. [§2] Notation for the curving 2-form and 3-form curvature should be introduced with a single consistent symbol set in §2 to avoid confusion when descending to the bicomplex.
  2. [§5] The Maxwell theory examples in §5 would benefit from an explicit table comparing the anomaly polynomial obtained via the Čech-de Rham descent with the standard result from the literature.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and insightful comments. The points raised highlight areas where additional explicit arguments would strengthen the presentation of the naturality of the construction. We address each major comment below and will incorporate clarifications in the revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract, §3] Abstract and §3 (Lie 2-algebroid construction): the central claim that the Čech cocycle data plus connective/curving structure 'directly supplies' the full field-ghost tower and BRST differential without auxiliary choices is load-bearing. The paper does not exhibit an explicit uniqueness argument showing that the algebroid bracket and higher Russian formula relations are fixed solely by the gerbe data; if additional structure is implicitly chosen, the asserted naturality of the Čech-de Rham bicomplex for anomaly descent is weakened.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit uniqueness statement would make the claim more robust. The construction in §3 is derived canonically from the local Čech cocycle, connection, and curving via the standard Lie 2-algebroid associated to a gerbe (with bracket induced by the 2-form data and higher Russian formula following from the Bianchi identity on the 3-curvature). In the revision we will add a short uniqueness subsection showing that any Lie 2-algebroid structure compatible with the given gerbe data must coincide with the one presented, up to isomorphism. This will be done without introducing new auxiliary choices. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4] §4 (Courant algebroid and BV complex): the identification of the exact Courant algebroid with the standard BV-BRST complex for the 2-form gauge field is asserted but not shown to be the unique extension compatible with the gerbe curvature; a concrete check that the ghost number assignments and differential match the conventional tower (without extra data) is required to support the claim.

    Authors: We accept that a direct, side-by-side verification strengthens the identification. The exact Courant algebroid is the standard one associated to the gerbe curvature 3-form; its sections and bracket reproduce the field-ghost tower with the usual ghost-number grading (0-forms of degree 0, 1-forms of degree 1, etc.) and the BRST differential is the Chevalley-Eilenberg differential of the algebroid. In the revision we will insert an explicit dictionary in §4 mapping generators and differentials to the conventional BV-BRST complex for a 2-form gauge field, confirming agreement on Maxwell theory without extra data. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: construction starts from external Čech gerbe data and builds Lie 2-algebroid/BV-BRST identification without self-definition or fitted predictions

full rationale

The paper's central derivation begins with the standard local Čech cocycle data of a U(1) gerbe (connective structure, curving, 3-form curvature) as input and constructs the Lie 2-algebroid and exact Courant algebroid from it, then identifies the resulting Čech-de Rham bicomplex with the BV-BRST complex. No equations or steps in the provided text reduce a claimed output to a fitted parameter, self-citation chain, or renamed input by construction; the higher Russian formula is stated to arise from the gerbe relations themselves rather than being presupposed. The derivation is therefore self-contained against the external geometric data of gerbes and does not exhibit any of the enumerated circularity patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract only; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are extractable.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5731 in / 1068 out tokens · 19308 ms · 2026-06-30T11:11:57.226840+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. On Quantum Aspects of 1-Form Symmetries II: Bordism, Invertible Phases, and Anomalies

    hep-th 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Bordism computation for K(Z,3) identifies a new mixed perturbative anomaly in 5D and a new Z2 discrete anomaly in 7D for U(1) 1-form symmetries.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

103 extracted references · 69 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 45 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Generalized Global Symmetries

    D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, N. Seiberg, and B. Willett, “Generalized global symmetries,”JHEP 02(2015) 172,arXiv:1412.5148 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  2. [2]

    An introduction to higher-form symmetries,

    P. R. S. Gomes, “An introduction to higher-form symmetries,”SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes74 (2023) 1,arXiv:2303.01817 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  3. [3]

    Lectures on Generalized Symmetries

    L. Bhardwaj, L. E. Bottini, L. Fraser-Taliente, L. Gladden, D. S. W. Gould, A. Platschorre, and H. Tillim, “Lectures on generalized symmetries,”Phys. Rept.1051(2024) 1–87, arXiv:2307.07547 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  4. [4]

    Luo, Q.-R

    R. Luo, Q.-R. Wang, and Y.-N. Wang, “Lecture notes on generalized symmetries and applications,”Phys. Rept.1065(2024) 1–43,arXiv:2307.09215 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    Jena lectures on generalized global symmetries: principles and applications,

    N. Iqbal, “Jena lectures on generalized global symmetries: principles and applications,” 2024. arXiv:2407.20815 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    Kaidi,Introduction to Generalized Symmetries,2603.08798

    J. Kaidi, “Introduction to generalized symmetries,”arXiv:2603.08798 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  7. [7]

    Anomalies in String Theory with D-Branes

    D. S. Freed and E. Witten, “Anomalies in string theory with D-branes,”Asian J. Math.3 (1999) 819,arXiv:hep-th/9907189. 39

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  8. [8]

    D-branes in a topologically nontrivial B-field

    A. Kapustin, “D-branes in a topologically nontrivial B field,”Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.4 (2000) 127–154,arXiv:hep-th/9909089

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  9. [9]

    D-brane charge, flux quantisation and relative (co)homology

    J. M. Figueroa-O’Farrill and S. Stanciu, “D-brane charge, flux quantization and relative (co)homology,”JHEP01(2001) 006,arXiv:hep-th/0008038

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  10. [10]

    Twisted K-theory and K-theory of bundle gerbes

    P. Bouwknegt, A. L. Carey, V. Mathai, M. K. Murray, and D. Stevenson, “Twisted K theory and K theory of bundle gerbes,”Commun. Math. Phys.228(2002) 17–49, arXiv:hep-th/0106194

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  11. [11]

    Gerbes, M5-Brane Anomalies and E_8 Gauge Theory

    P. Aschieri and B. Jurco, “Gerbes, M5-brane anomalies and E(8) gauge theory,”JHEP10 (2004) 068,arXiv:hep-th/0409200

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  12. [12]

    Higher Gauge Theory: 2-Connections on 2-Bundles

    J. Baez and U. Schreiber, “Higher gauge theory: 2-connections on 2-bundles,” arXiv:hep-th/0412325

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  13. [13]

    An Invitation to Higher Gauge Theory

    J. C. Baez and J. Huerta, “An invitation to higher gauge theory,”Gen. Rel. Grav.43(2011) 2335–2392,arXiv:1003.4485 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  14. [14]

    Mean string field theory: Landau-Ginzburg theory for 1-form symmetries,

    N. Iqbal and J. McGreevy, “Mean string field theory: Landau-Ginzburg theory for 1-form symmetries,”SciPost Phys.13(2022) 114,arXiv:2106.12610 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  15. [15]

    Effective brane field theory with higher-form symmetry,

    Y. Hidaka and K. Kawana, “Effective brane field theory with higher-form symmetry,”JHEP 01(2024) 016,arXiv:2310.07993 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  16. [16]

    Higher-matter and Landau-Ginzburg theory of higher-group symmetries,

    R. Liu, R. Luo, and Y.-N. Wang, “Higher-matter and Landau-Ginzburg theory of higher-group symmetries,”SciPost Phys.18(2025) no. 2, 052,arXiv:2406.03974 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    Landau theory for lattice higher-form gauge theories and the Kramers-Wannier duality,

    K. Kawana, “Landau theory for lattice higher-form gauge theories and the Kramers-Wannier duality,”Phys. Rev. D112(2025) no. 7, 074514,arXiv:2507.06555 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    Variational method for interacting surfaces with higher-form global symmetries,

    K. Kawana, “Variational method for interacting surfaces with higher-form global symmetries,”arXiv:2602.08310 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    work page arXiv

  19. [19]

    On Quantum Aspects of 1-Form Symmetries II: Bordism, Invertible Phases, and Anomalies

    W. Jia, Y.-N. Wang, and Y. Zhang, “On quantum aspects of 1-form symmetries II: bordism, invertible phases, and anomalies,”arXiv:2606.07056 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  20. [20]

    Gauge algebra and quantization,

    I. A. Batalin and G. A. Vilkovisky, “Gauge algebra and quantization,”Phys. Lett. B102 (1981) 27–31

    1981

  21. [21]

    Quantization of gauge theories with linearly dependent generators,

    I. Batalin and G. Vilkovisky, “Quantization of gauge theories with linearly dependent generators,”Phys. Rev. D28(1983) 2567–2582. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 30, 508 (1984)]

    1983

  22. [22]

    Henneaux and C

    M. Henneaux and C. Teitelboim,Quantization of Gauge Systems. Princeton University Press, 1992

    1992

  23. [23]

    Antibracket, Antifields and Gauge-Theory Quantization

    J. Gomis, J. Paris, and S. Samuel, “Antibracket, antifields and gauge theory quantization,” Phys. Rept.259(1995) 1–145,arXiv:hep-th/9412228

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  24. [24]

    Algebraic structure and topological origin of anomalies,

    R. Stora, “Algebraic structure and topological origin of anomalies,” inProgress in Gauge Field Theory, G. ’t Hooft, A. Jaffe, H. Lehmann, P. K. Mitter, I. M. Singer, and R. Stora, eds., pp. 543–562. Springer US, Boston, 1984. 40

    1984

  25. [25]

    Consequences of anomalous Ward identities,

    J. Wess and B. Zumino, “Consequences of anomalous Ward identities,”Phys. Lett. B37 (1971) 95–97

    1971

  26. [26]

    Continuum gauge theories,

    R. Stora, “Continuum gauge theories,” inNew Developments in Quantum Field Theory and Statistical Mechanics Cargèse 1976, M. Lévy and P. Mitter, eds., pp. 201–224. Springer US, Boston, 1977

    1976

  27. [27]

    Chiral anomalies, higher dimensions, and differential geometry,

    B. Zumino, Y.-S. Wu, and A. Zee, “Chiral anomalies, higher dimensions, and differential geometry,”Nucl. Phys. B239(1984) 477–507

    1984

  28. [28]

    Cohomology of gauge groups: cocycles and Schwinger terms,

    B. Zumino, “Cohomology of gauge groups: cocycles and Schwinger terms,”Nucl. Phys. B 253(1985) 477–493

    1985

  29. [29]

    Chiral anomalies and differential geometry,

    B. Zumino, “Chiral anomalies and differential geometry,” inCurrent Algebra and Anomalies, pp. 361–392. Princeton University Press, 1985

    1985

  30. [30]

    BRST cohomology is Lie algebroid cohomology,

    W. Jia, M. S. Klinger, and R. G. Leigh, “BRST cohomology is Lie algebroid cohomology,” Nucl. Phys. B994(2023) 116317,arXiv:2303.05540 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  31. [31]

    Lie algebroids and the geometry of off-shell BRST,

    L. Ciambelli and R. G. Leigh, “Lie algebroids and the geometry of off-shell BRST,”Nucl. Phys. B972(2021) 115553,arXiv:2101.03974 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  32. [32]

    Complex analytic connections in fibre bundles,

    M. F. Atiyah, “Complex analytic connections in fibre bundles,”Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.85 (1957) no. 1, 181–207

    1957

  33. [33]

    Higher-Dimensional Algebra V: 2-Groups

    J. C. Baez and A. D. Lauda, “Higher-dimensional algebra V: 2-groups,” arXiv:math/0307200

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  34. [34]

    Higher-Dimensional Algebra VI: Lie 2-Algebras

    J. C. Baez and A. S. Crans, “Higher-dimensional algebra VI: Lie 2-algebras,”Theor. Appl. Categor.12(2004) 492–528,arXiv:math/0307263

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  35. [35]

    L∞-algebra connections and applications to string- and Chern-Simonsn-transport,

    H. Sati, U. Schreiber, and J. Stasheff, “L∞-algebra connections and applications to string- and Chern-Simonsn-transport,” inQuantum Field Theory: Competitive Models, pp. 303–424. Springer, 2009

    2009

  36. [36]

    Multiple M5-branes, String 2-connections, and 7d nonabelian Chern-Simons theory

    D. Fiorenza, H. Sati, and U. Schreiber, “Multiple M5-branes, string 2-connections, and 7d nonabelian Chern-Simons theory,”Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.18(2014) no. 2, 229–321, arXiv:1201.5277 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  37. [37]

    L∞-Algebras of Classical Field Theories and the Batalin-Vilkovisky Formalism,

    B. Jurčo, L. Raspollini, C. Sämann, and M. Wolf, “L∞-algebras of classical field theories and the Batalin-Vilkovisky formalism,”Fortsch. Phys.67(2019) no. 7, 1900025, arXiv:1809.09899 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2019

  38. [38]

    The insidious bicategory of algebra bundles,

    P. Kristel, M. Ludewig, and K. Waldorf, “The insidious bicategory of algebra bundles,” arXiv:2204.03900 [math.DG]

    work page arXiv

  39. [39]

    The stringor bundle,

    P. Kristel, M. Ludewig, and K. Waldorf, “The stringor bundle,”arXiv:2206.09797 [math.AT]

    work page arXiv

  40. [40]

    Gauging the gauge and anomaly resolution,

    H. Chen and F. Girelli, “Gauging the gauge and anomaly resolution,”arXiv:2211.08549 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  41. [41]

    A representation of the string 2-group,

    P. Kristel, M. Ludewig, and K. Waldorf, “A representation of the string 2-group,” arXiv:2308.05139 [math.OA]. 41

    work page arXiv

  42. [42]

    Higher geometric structures on manifolds and the gauge theory of Deligne cohomology,

    S. Bunk and C. S. Shahbazi, “Higher geometric structures on manifolds and the gauge theory of Deligne cohomology,”arXiv:2304.06633 [math.DG]

    work page arXiv

  43. [43]

    Rist,Non-Abelian Gerbes with Connections in Higher Gauge Theory

    D. Rist,Non-Abelian Gerbes with Connections in Higher Gauge Theory. PhD thesis, Heriot-Watt U., 2023

    2023

  44. [44]

    Infinitesimal Symmetries of Dixmier-Douady Gerbes

    B. L. Collier, “Infinitesimal symmetries of Dixmier-Douady gerbes,”arXiv:1108.1525 [math.DG]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  45. [45]

    Higher extensions of Lie algebroids,

    Y. Sheng and C. Zhu, “Higher extensions of Lie algebroids,”Commun. Contemp. Math.19 (2017) no. 03, 1650034

    2017

  46. [46]

    The first Pontryagin class of a quadratic Lie 2-algebroid,

    Y. Sheng, “The first Pontryagin class of a quadratic Lie 2-algebroid,”Comm. Math. Phys. 362(2018) no. 2, 689–716

    2018

  47. [47]

    Atiyah sequence and gauge transformations of a principal 2-bundle over a Lie groupoid,

    S. Chatterjee, A. Chaudhuri, and P. Koushik, “Atiyah sequence and gauge transformations of a principal 2-bundle over a Lie groupoid,”J. Geom. Phys.176(2022) 104509

    2022

  48. [48]

    Lie 2-algebroids and matched pairs of 2-representations: a geometric approach,

    M. Jotz Lean, “Lie 2-algebroids and matched pairs of 2-representations: a geometric approach,”Pacific J. Math.301(2019) no. 1, 143–188

    2019

  49. [49]

    Beyond Poisson structures,

    T. J. Courant and A. Weinstein, “Beyond Poisson structures,” inAction Hamiltoniennes de Groupes. Troisième Théorème de Lie (Lyon, 1986), vol. 27 ofTravaux en Cours, pp. 39–49. Hermann, Paris, 1988

    1986

  50. [50]

    Dirac manifolds,

    T. J. Courant, “Dirac manifolds,”Trans. Am. Math. Soc.319(1990) no. 2, 631–661

    1990

  51. [51]

    Manin triples for Lie bialgebroids,

    Z.-J. Liu, A. Weinstein, and P. Xu, “Manin triples for Lie bialgebroids,”J. Differ. Geom.45 (1997) no. 3, 547–574

    1997

  52. [52]

    Roytenberg,Courant Algebroids, Derived Brackets and Even Symplectic Supermanifolds

    D. Roytenberg,Courant Algebroids, Derived Brackets and Even Symplectic Supermanifolds. PhD thesis, UC, Berkeley, 1999

    1999

  53. [53]

    Courant Algebroids

    P. Bressler and A. Chervov, “Courant algebroids,”arXiv:hep-th/0212195

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  54. [54]

    Generalized Calabi-Yau manifolds

    N. Hitchin, “Generalized Calabi-Yau manifolds,”Quart. J. Math. Oxford Ser.54(2003) 281–308,arXiv:math/0209099

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  55. [55]

    Generalized complex geometry

    M. Gualtieri,Generalized Complex Geometry. PhD thesis, Oxford U., 2003. arXiv:math/0401221

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  56. [56]

    Brackets, forms and invariant functionals

    N. Hitchin, “Brackets, forms and invariant functionals,”arXiv:math/0508618

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  57. [57]

    Lectures on generalized geometry

    N. Hitchin, “Lectures on generalized geometry,”arXiv:1008.0973 [math.DG]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  58. [58]

    Generalized complex geometry

    M. Gualtieri, “Generalized complex geometry,”Ann. Math.(2011) 75–123, arXiv:math/0703298

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  59. [59]

    Supersymmetric Backgrounds from Generalized Calabi-Yau Manifolds

    M. Grana, R. Minasian, M. Petrini, and A. Tomasiello, “Supersymmetric backgrounds from generalized Calabi-Yau manifolds,”JHEP08(2004) 046,arXiv:hep-th/0406137

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  60. [60]

    Generalized structures of N=1 vacua

    M. Grana, R. Minasian, M. Petrini, and A. Tomasiello, “Generalized structures of N=1 vacua,”JHEP11(2005) 020,arXiv:hep-th/0505212. 42

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  61. [61]

    T-duality, Generalized Geometry and Non-Geometric Backgrounds

    M. Grana, R. Minasian, M. Petrini, and D. Waldram, “T-duality, generalized geometry and non-geometric backgrounds,”JHEP04(2009) 075,arXiv:0807.4527 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  62. [62]

    Double Field Theory

    C. Hull and B. Zwiebach, “Double field theory,”JHEP09(2009) 099,arXiv:0904.4664 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  63. [63]

    AdS_5 Solutions of Type IIB Supergravity and Generalized Complex Geometry

    M. Gabella, J. P. Gauntlett, E. Palti, J. Sparks, and D. Waldram, “AdS(5) solutions of type IIB supergravity and generalized complex geometry,”Commun. Math. Phys.299(2010) 365–408,arXiv:0906.4109 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  64. [64]

    Generalized metric formulation of double field theory

    O. Hohm, C. Hull, and B. Zwiebach, “Generalized metric formulation of double field theory,” JHEP08(2010) 008,arXiv:1006.4823 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  65. [65]

    Generalized Geometry and M theory

    D. S. Berman and M. J. Perry, “Generalized geometry and M theory,”JHEP06(2011) 074, arXiv:1008.1763 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  66. [66]

    Frame-like Geometry of Double Field Theory

    O. Hohm and S. K. Kwak, “Frame-like geometry of double field theory,”J. Phys. A44 (2011) 085404,arXiv:1011.4101 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  67. [67]

    The Spacetime of Double Field Theory: Review, Remarks, and Outlook

    O. Hohm, D. Lüst, and B. Zwiebach, “The spacetime of double field theory: review, remarks, and outlook,”Fortsch. Phys.61(2013) 926–966,arXiv:1309.2977 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  68. [68]

    Exploring Double Field Theory

    D. Geissbuhler, D. Marques, C. Nunez, and V. Penas, “Exploring double field theory,”JHEP 06(2013) 101,arXiv:1304.1472 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  69. [69]

    K. C. Mackenzie,General Theory of Lie Groupoids and Lie Algebroids. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005

    2005

  70. [70]

    Jia,Topics in Weyl Geometry and Quantum Anomalies

    W. Jia,Topics in Weyl Geometry and Quantum Anomalies. PhD thesis, Illinois U., Urbana, 2024.arXiv:2407.02695 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  71. [71]

    Formulation of gauge theories on transitive Lie algebroids

    C. Fournel, S. Lazzarini, and T. Masson, “Formulation of gauge theories on transitive Lie algebroids,”J. Geom. Phys.64(2013) 174–191,arXiv:1205.6725 [math-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  72. [72]

    Connections on Lie algebroids and on derivation-based noncommutative geometry,

    S. Lazzarini and T. Masson, “Connections on Lie algebroids and on derivation-based noncommutative geometry,”J. Geom. Phys.62(2012) no. 2, 387–402

    2012

  73. [73]

    Topological quantization and cohomology,

    O. Alvarez, “Topological quantization and cohomology,”Commun. Math. Phys.100(1985) 279

    1985

  74. [74]

    Differentiable and algebroid cohomology, van Est isomorphisms, and characteristic classes,

    M. Crainic, “Differentiable and algebroid cohomology, van Est isomorphisms, and characteristic classes,”Comment. Math. Helv.78(2003) no. 4, 681–721

    2003

  75. [75]

    Van Est isomorphism for homogeneous cochains,

    A. Cabrera and T. Drummond, “Van Est isomorphism for homogeneous cochains,”Pac. J. Math.287(2017) no. 2, 297–336

    2017

  76. [76]

    Brylinski,Loop Spaces, Characteristic Classes and Geometric Quantization, vol

    J.-L. Brylinski,Loop Spaces, Characteristic Classes and Geometric Quantization, vol. 107 of Progress in Mathematics. Birkhäuser Boston, Boston, 1993

    1993

  77. [77]

    Bundle gerbes

    M. K. Murray, “Bundle gerbes,”J.Lond.Math.Soc.54(1996) no. 2, 403–416, arXiv:dg-ga/9407015 [dg-ga]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  78. [78]

    D. S. Chatterjee,On Gerbs. PhD thesis, Cambridge U., 1998. 43

    1998

  79. [79]

    Lectures on Special Lagrangian Submanifolds

    N. J. Hitchin, “Lectures on special Lagrangian submanifolds,”AMS/IP Stud. Adv. Math.23 (2001) 151–182,arXiv:math/9907034

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  80. [80]

    An Introduction to Bundle Gerbes

    M. K. Murray, “An introduction to bundle gerbes,” inThe Many Facets of Geometry: A Tribute to Nigel Hitchin, O. Garcia-Prada, J. P. Bourguignon, and S. Salamon, eds., ch. XII. Oxford University Press, 07, 2010.arXiv:0712.1651 [math.DG]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

Showing first 80 references.