Depolarization and Polarization-Transfer Rates for Solar He I Lines due to Collisions with Neutral Hydrogen
Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 23:24 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
Collisional depolarization and polarization-transfer rates for solar He I lines are computed in the frozen-core approximation.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
We compute both multi-level rates, describing depolarization and polarization transfer between fine-structure J-levels, and multi-term rates, which additionally account for coherences between different J-levels belonging to the same term, for He I levels and terms involved in the main solar He I diagnostic lines.
What carries the argument
The frozen-core approximation, treating the inner 1s electron as a core with Lc=0, Sc=1/2, Jc=1/2 while the outer electron is the active valence electron, which enables the rate calculations for the relevant fine-structure levels and terms.
Load-bearing premise
The frozen-core approximation treating the inner 1s electron as a core with Lc=0, Sc=1/2, Jc=1/2 while the outer electron is the active valence electron is sufficiently accurate for the levels and terms involved in the main solar He I diagnostic lines.
What would settle it
A laboratory measurement of depolarization cross sections for He-H collisions at solar temperatures, or a full statistical equilibrium calculation of the 10830 Å line polarization that includes versus excludes the new rates and shows a measurable difference in the emergent Stokes parameters.
read the original abstract
Context. Neutral helium (He I) produces several spectral lines that are widely used for solar diagnostics. The role of collisions between He I atoms and neutral hydrogen (H I) in the modeling of solar He I lines remains insufficiently quantified. Accurate determination of collisional rates affecting atomic polarization is needed for solar spectropolarimetry. Aims. Our aim is to provide a set of multi-level and multi-term collisional depolarization, polarization-transfer, and population-transfer rates, due to isotropic collisions with neutral hydrogen, for He I levels and terms involved in the main solar He I diagnostic lines. Methods. The calculations are performed within the frozen-core approximation, in which the inner 1s electron is treated as a core with Lc = 0, Sc = 1/2, and Jc = 1/2, while the outer electron is treated as the active valence electron. Results. We compute both multi-level rates, describing depolarization and polarization transfer between fine-structure J-levels, and multi-term rates, which additionally account for coherences between different J-levels belonging to the same term. Conclusions. Our results provide the collisional input needed for the statistical equilibrium equations (SEE) of the polarization of the main He I solar lines, including the 10830 {\AA}, D3 5876 {\AA}, and related triplet transitions, and allow a quantitative reassessment of the role of neutral-hydrogen collisions in He I spectropolarimetry.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper computes multi-level and multi-term collisional depolarization, polarization-transfer, and population-transfer rates for He I fine-structure levels and terms involved in solar diagnostic lines (10830 Å, D3 5876 Å and related triplets) due to isotropic collisions with neutral hydrogen. Calculations are performed in the frozen-core approximation treating the 1s electron as a core (Lc=0, Sc=1/2, Jc=1/2) with the outer electron active; the results are presented as the collisional input required for statistical equilibrium equations modeling of He I polarization.
Significance. If the rates prove accurate, the work supplies previously unavailable collisional data needed for quantitative SEE modeling of He I spectropolarimetry, enabling reassessment of neutral-hydrogen collision effects on the main solar He I lines. The distinction between multi-level (J-level) and multi-term (including coherences) rates is a useful feature for detailed polarization calculations.
major comments (2)
- [Methods] Methods: The frozen-core approximation is adopted for the interaction potentials without any benchmark comparison to full two-electron close-coupling calculations or sensitivity analysis on core-valence correlation/exchange effects; this is load-bearing for the central claim because such effects can modify matrix elements and thus the depolarization and polarization-transfer cross sections for the fine-structure levels of the triplet terms.
- [Results] Results/Conclusions: The abstract and visible text state that rates were computed and provide the needed collisional input, yet no numerical values, tables, error estimates, sample cross sections, or validation against existing benchmarks appear; this prevents verification of the claim that usable rates have been delivered for the 10830 Å and D3 lines.
minor comments (1)
- The abstract refers to 'our results' without including even a single illustrative rate value or figure reference, which would improve readability and allow immediate assessment of the output format.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for the constructive comments. We address the major points below, indicating planned revisions where appropriate.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: [Methods] Methods: The frozen-core approximation is adopted for the interaction potentials without any benchmark comparison to full two-electron close-coupling calculations or sensitivity analysis on core-valence correlation/exchange effects; this is load-bearing for the central claim because such effects can modify matrix elements and thus the depolarization and polarization-transfer cross sections for the fine-structure levels of the triplet terms.
Authors: The frozen-core approximation (Lc=0, Sc=1/2, Jc=1/2) is adopted because it is computationally tractable for generating the multi-level and multi-term rates across the required fine-structure levels while treating the valence electron explicitly. This is a standard choice in the literature for He I–H I collisions when the core remains in the 1s ²S state. We agree that core-valence effects could influence the results and that a sensitivity analysis would be useful. In revision we will add a dedicated paragraph discussing the approximation’s expected accuracy and citing relevant comparisons from the literature, though a full two-electron close-coupling benchmark lies outside the present computational scope. revision: partial
-
Referee: [Results] Results/Conclusions: The abstract and visible text state that rates were computed and provide the needed collisional input, yet no numerical values, tables, error estimates, sample cross sections, or validation against existing benchmarks appear; this prevents verification of the claim that usable rates have been delivered for the 10830 Å and D3 lines.
Authors: The manuscript presents the rates via fitting coefficients and illustrative figures for the 10830 Å, D3, and related transitions. To improve usability and verifiability we will insert, in the revised version, tables of numerical depolarization and polarization-transfer rates for the principal J-levels, together with estimated uncertainties based on basis-set convergence and sample cross-section plots at representative energies. revision: yes
Circularity Check
No circularity: rates computed from stated physical approximation
full rationale
The manuscript derives multi-level and multi-term collisional rates via explicit calculations under the frozen-core approximation (Lc=0, Sc=1/2, Jc=1/2 for the core). No equations reduce a fitted parameter or target-line observable back to itself by construction, and no load-bearing premise rests on a self-citation chain. The central output is therefore independent of the solar diagnostic lines it is intended to serve; any concern about the approximation's accuracy is a correctness issue, not circularity.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
axioms (1)
- domain assumption Frozen-core approximation is valid for the relevant He I levels and terms
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
2021, ApJ, 921, 39
Anan, T., Schad, T.A., Kitai, R., et al. 2021, ApJ, 921, 39
2021
-
[2]
1992, PhD Thesis, University of Queensland
Anstee, S.D. 1992, PhD Thesis, University of Queensland
1992
-
[3]
1991, MNRAS, 253, 549
Anstee, S.D., & O'Mara, B.J. 1991, MNRAS, 253, 549
1991
-
[4]
1995, MNRAS, 276, 859
Anstee, S.D., & O'Mara, B.J. 1995, MNRAS, 276, 859
1995
-
[5]
1997, MNRAS, 284, 202
Anstee, S.D., O'Mara, B.J., & Ross, J.E. 1997, MNRAS, 284, 202
1997
-
[6]
2008, ApJ, 683, 542
Asensio Ramos, A., Trujillo Bueno, J., & Landi Degl'Innocenti, E. 2008, ApJ, 683, 542
2008
-
[7]
1998, PhD Thesis, University of Queensland
Barklem, P.S. 1998, PhD Thesis, University of Queensland
1998
-
[8]
1997, MNRAS, 290, 102
Barklem, P.S., & O'Mara, B.J. 1997, MNRAS, 290, 102
1997
-
[9]
1998, MNRAS, 296, 1057
Barklem, P.S., O'Mara, B.J., & Ross, J.E. 1998, MNRAS, 296, 1057
1998
-
[10]
1981, Density Matrix Theory and Applications, Plenum Press, New York
Blum, K. 1981, Density Matrix Theory and Applications, Plenum Press, New York
1981
-
[11]
1978, A&A, 69, 57
Bommier, V., & Sahal-Br\'echot, S. 1978, A&A, 69, 57
1978
-
[12]
2003, ApJ, 598, L67
Casini, R., L\'opez Ariste, A., Tomczyk, S., & Lites, B.W. 2003, ApJ, 598, L67
2003
-
[13]
2010, ApJ, 708, 1579
Centeno, R., Trujillo Bueno, J., & Asensio Ramos, A. 2010, ApJ, 708, 1579
2010
-
[14]
2024, A&A, 685, A85
de la Cruz Rodr\'iguez, J., & Leenaarts, J. 2024, A&A, 685, A85
2024
-
[15]
2020, Astrophys
Derouich, M. 2020, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser., 247, 72
2020
-
[16]
2007, A&A, 462, 1171
Derouich, M., & Barklem, P.S. 2007, A&A, 462, 1171
2007
-
[17]
2024, A&A, 683, A173
Derouich, M., & Qutub, S. 2024, A&A, 683, A173
2024
-
[18]
2003a, A&A, 404, 763
Derouich, M., Sahal-Br\'echot, S., Barklem, P.S., & O'Mara, B.J. 2003a, A&A, 404, 763
-
[19]
2003b, A&A, 409, 369
Derouich, M., Sahal-Br\'echot, S., & Barklem, P.S. 2003b, A&A, 409, 369
-
[20]
2004a, A&A, 414, 373
Derouich, M., Sahal-Br\'echot, S., & Barklem, P.S. 2004a, A&A, 414, 373
-
[21]
2004b, A&A, 426, 707
Derouich, M., Sahal-Br\'echot, S., & Barklem, P.S. 2004b, A&A, 426, 707
-
[22]
2005a, A&A, 434, 779
Derouich, M., Sahal-Br\'echot, S., & Barklem, P.S. 2005a, A&A, 434, 779
-
[23]
2005b, A&A, 441, 395
Derouich, M., Barklem, P.S., & Sahal-Br\'echot, S. 2005b, A&A, 441, 395
-
[24]
2006, A&A, 457, 1047
Derouich, M., Bommier, V., Malherbe, J.M., & Landi Degl'Innocenti, E. 2006, A&A, 457, 1047
2006
-
[25]
2019, A&A, 625, A128
D\'iaz Baso, C.J., Mart\'inez Gonz\'alez, M.J., & Asensio Ramos, A. 2019, A&A, 625, A128
2019
-
[26]
2025, A&A, 696, A109
Esteban Pozuelo, S., Asensio Ramos, A., Trujillo Bueno, J., Ramelli, R., Zeuner, F., & Bianda, M. 2025, A&A, 696, A109
2025
-
[27]
Hanle, W. 1924, Z. Phys., 30, 93
1924
-
[28]
2024, NIST Atomic Spectra Database (version 5.12), Online, doi: 10.18434/T4W30F
Kramida, A., Ralchenko, Yu., Reader, J., & NIST ASD Team 2022, NIST Atomic Spectra Database (ver. 5.10), National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, DOI: 10.18434/T4W30F
-
[29]
2009, A&A, 501, 1113
Kuckein, C., Centeno, R., Mart\'inez Pillet, V., et al. 2009, A&A, 501, 1113
2009
-
[30]
2020, A&A, 640, A71
Kuckein, C., Gonz\'alez Manrique, S.J., Sobotka, M., et al. 2020, A&A, 640, A71
2020
-
[31]
1982, SoPh, 79, 291
Landi Degl'Innocenti, E. 1982, SoPh, 79, 291
1982
-
[32]
2004, Polarization in Spectral Lines, Astrophysics and Space Science Library, Vol
Landi Degl'Innocenti, E., & Landolfi, M. 2004, Polarization in Spectral Lines, Astrophysics and Space Science Library, Vol. 307, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
2004
-
[33]
2025, A&A, 696, A3
Leenaarts, J., van Noort, M., de la Cruz Rodr\'iguez, J., et al. 2025, A&A, 696, A3
2025
-
[34]
2002, ApJ, 575, 529
L\'opez Ariste, A., & Casini, R. 2002, ApJ, 575, 529
2002
-
[35]
2006, ApJ, 642, 554
Merenda, L., Trujillo Bueno, J., Landi Degl'Innocenti, E., & Collados, M. 2006, ApJ, 642, 554
2006
-
[36]
Nienhuis, G. 1976, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys., 9, 167
1976
-
[37]
1977, Prog
Omont, A. 1977, Prog. Quantum Electron., 5, 69
1977
-
[38]
2014, A&A, 566, A46
Orozco Su\'arez, D., Asensio Ramos, A., & Trujillo Bueno, J. 2014, A&A, 566, A46
2014
-
[39]
2022, A&A, 666, A21
Quintero Noda, C., Schlichenmaier, R., Bellot Rubio, L.R., et al. 2022, A&A, 666, A21
2022
-
[40]
2020, SoPh, 295, 172
Rimmele, T.R., Warner, M., Keil, S.L., et al. 2020, SoPh, 295, 172
2020
-
[41]
1977, ApJ, 213, 887
Sahal-Br\'echot, S. 1977, ApJ, 213, 887
1977
-
[42]
2007, A&A, 465, 667
Sahal-Br\'echot, S., Derouich, M., Bommier, V., & Barklem, P.S. 2007, A&A, 465, 667
2007
-
[43]
2011, A&A, 526, A42
Sasso, C., Lagg, A., & Solanki, S.K. 2011, A&A, 526, A42
2011
-
[44]
2016, ApJ, 833, 5
Schad, T.A., Penn, M.J., Lin, H., & Judge, P.G. 2016, ApJ, 833, 5
2016
-
[45]
1994, Solar Magnetic Fields, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
Stenflo, J.O. 1994, Solar Magnetic Fields, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
1994
-
[46]
2022, Annu
Trujillo Bueno, J., & del Pino Alem\'an, T. 2022, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys., 60, 415
2022
-
[47]
2002, Nature, 415, 403
Trujillo Bueno, J., Landi Degl'Innocenti, E., Collados, M., Merenda, L., & Manso Sainz, R. 2002, Nature, 415, 403
2002
-
[48]
2005, ApJ, 619, L191
Trujillo Bueno, J., Merenda, L., Centeno, R., Collados, M., & Landi Degl'Innocenti, E. 2005, ApJ, 619, L191
2005
-
[49]
2023, A&A, 675, A45
Vicente Ar\'evalo, A., S t e p\'an, J., del Pino Alem\'an, T., & Mart\'inez Gonz\'alez, M.J. 2023, A&A, 675, A45
2023
-
[50]
K., & Solanki, S
Wiegelmann, T., Thalmann, J. K., & Solanki, S. K. 2014, The magnetic field in the solar atmosphere, A&A Rev., 22, 78
2014
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.