pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.08859 · v2 · pith:5WOY7KLEnew · submitted 2026-06-07 · 🌌 astro-ph.EP · astro-ph.IM· astro-ph.SR· physics.comp-ph

A Framework to Model Stellar Irradiated Disks with Frequency-dependent Absorption and Scattering Opacities in Athena++

Stanley A. Baronett , Yan-Fei Jiang , Zhaohuan Zhu , Shangjia Zhang , Philip J. Armitage This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 17:39 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.EP astro-ph.IMastro-ph.SRphysics.comp-ph
keywords protoplanetary disksstellar irradiationfrequency-dependent opacityradiation transportAthena++hydrostatic equilibriumMonte Carlo comparison
0
0 comments X

The pith

A new multigroup radiation framework in Athena++ models stellar irradiated disks with frequency-dependent opacities and matches Monte Carlo benchmarks within 2-5% using 64 bands.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a radiation transport framework for protoplanetary disks that incorporates frequency-dependent absorption and scattering to determine their thermal structure. It calibrates the method on hydrostatic models to isolate radiative effects and compares results to Monte Carlo radiative-transfer benchmarks. The work shows that using more frequency bands improves accuracy in capturing the vertical temperature gradient where ultraviolet light heats the atmosphere more than the midplane. This establishes a foundation for accurate and efficient modeling that can extend to dynamical simulations.

Core claim

Our hydrostatic models achieve equilibrium temperatures that differ from Monte Carlo radiative-transfer benchmarks on average by 2--5% with 64 frequency bands and 7--11% with 3 bands. Reducing the number of bands lowers computational cost by at least an order of magnitude while increasing the maximum possible temperature deviation only from 8% to 19%.

What carries the argument

Multigroup radiation transport with frequency-dependent absorption and scattering opacities and newly implemented radial rays to represent the stellar flux in the Athena++ finite-volume code.

If this is right

  • The vertical temperature gradient is captured more accurately when more frequency bands are used or when scattering is included.
  • Reducing the number of bands lowers computational cost by at least an order of magnitude while increasing the maximum possible temperature deviation only from 8% to 19%.
  • This calibration provides a solid foundation for future self-consistent studies of irradiated protoplanetary disks, including fully dynamical simulations and applications involving chemical processes and time-dependent stellar luminosity.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This method could enable studies of how accurate thermal structures affect planet formation processes like migration and accretion in dynamical disks.
  • Similar frequency-dependent approaches might improve models of other optically thick irradiated systems beyond protoplanetary disks.
  • Extending the framework to include time-dependent effects could help simulate variable stellar activity on disk evolution.

Load-bearing premise

The premise that restricting the study to hydrostatic disk models isolates radiative effects without dynamical complexity, allowing the reported accuracy to generalize to future moving-disk simulations.

What would settle it

Running a full radiation-hydrodynamic simulation with moving gas and comparing the resulting temperature profiles directly to Monte Carlo benchmarks would test if the accuracy persists under dynamical conditions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.08859 by Philip J. Armitage, Shangjia Zhang, Stanley A. Baronett, Yan-Fei Jiang, Zhaohuan Zhu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Visualizing the angular discretization within a finite-volume cell with global spherical coordinates (r, θ, ϕ). Arrows show the directional unit vectors nˆ used in equa￾tion (1). Blue ones show the standard set described by Y.-F. Jiang (2021, § 3.2.4) for Nζ = 1 and Nψ = 2 (Section 2.1). Orange ones show the new pair nˆr aligned to the global radial direction ˆr (Section 2.2). (Section 2.1) that point inwa… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Example dust opacities and relevant Planck spectra. In the left panel, curve colors show the Planck mean κp,f [equation (8)], Rosseland mean κr,f [equation (9)], and pure-scattering-mean κs,f [equation (10)] opacities as functions of tem￾perature for each one of Nf = 4 log-uniform frequency bands f differentiated by line styles (Section 2.1); the red shaded region, bounded by dashed red vertical lines, hig… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Midplane radial profiles at θmid ≡ π/2 = 0◦ latitude (cf [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Meridional profiles at r = R0 = 17.0 au (cf. Fig￾ure 3). The upper horizontal axis converts latitudes along the bottom to Z(R0) = R0 cos θ in scale heights H0 at R0 (Section 3.1). Referring to the left vertical axis, the solid blue curve shows the density ρ in the thin-disk limit [equation (17)] and the dashed orange the Athena++ out￾put [equation (15)] with floor ρmin = 4.28 × 10−26 g cm−3 . Referring to … view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The axisymmetric protoplanetary disk model. In this meridional projection, radius r is in astronomical units (au), and disk latitudes are in degrees with the midplane at 0◦ and the poles at ±90◦ . The left half shows the time-independent (Sections 3.3) dust density ρ [equation (15)] and the right the effective optical depth to peak stellar irradiation τ∗ as integrated radially outward [equation (19)]. to w… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Similar to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Total radiation energy density Er,tot [equa￾tion (24)] as a function of time for hydrostatic models that include frequency-dependent absorption and scattering opac￾ities across Nf = 64 bands. The blue curve shows the case for radiative attenuation only (i.e., without dust heating), the orange shows that for absorption (i.e., with dust thermal ree￾mission), the dotted gray vertical line shows the light-cros… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: shows the relative (i.e., fractional) error in Fr(τ ) between the Athena++ solution and equation (28) at latitudes representing the three distinct regions in optical depth (Section 3.2; cf [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Equilibrium temperatures Teq from models sharing the same gray absorption opacity κ abs = 300 cm2 g −1 . The left panels show radial profiles, while the right ones show them as functions of gray optical depth τ [equation (27)]. The upper panels show absolute temperatures, while the lower ones show the absolute relative (i.e., fractional) difference between RADMC-3D (Section 4.1.1) and Athena++ with either … view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Similar to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Similar to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Similar to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Similar to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Similar to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Total core hours (i.e., the multiplicative product of the number of CPU cores and the elapsed real time) used to integrate various Athena++ models up to the same simulation time limit tlim ≈ 6.5×105 s ≈ 2.6teq ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Similar to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Similar to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_17.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The frequency dependence of opacity is crucial for determining the thermal structure of protoplanetary disks, which in turn influences disk dynamics and planet formation. Yet many disk models adopt simplified thermodynamics, and common radiation-hydrodynamic approaches often use gray opacities, ignore scattering, and yield inaccurate results in regions with intermediate optical depth. We present a comprehensive framework that models stellar irradiation with frequency-dependent absorption and scattering across all optical depths using the Athena++ finite-volume code, extended with multigroup radiation transport and newly implemented radial rays to more accurately represent the stellar flux. To calibrate this framework, we focus exclusively on hydrostatic disk models, allowing us to isolate radiative effects and evaluate the method without additional dynamical complexity. Because dust opacity increases strongly with frequency, ultraviolet stellar irradiation heats the tenuous disk atmosphere while the optically thick midplane remains cooler. This vertical temperature gradient is captured more accurately when more frequency bands are used or when scattering is included. Our hydrostatic models achieve equilibrium temperatures that differ from Monte Carlo radiative-transfer benchmarks on average by 2--5% with 64 frequency bands and 7--11% with 3 bands. Reducing the number of bands lowers computational cost by at least an order of magnitude while increasing the maximum possible temperature deviation only from 8% to 19%. This calibration demonstrates the accuracy and efficiency of the framework and provides a solid foundation for future self-consistent studies of irradiated protoplanetary disks, including fully dynamical simulations and applications involving chemical processes and time-dependent stellar luminosity.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a framework implemented in Athena++ for modeling stellar-irradiated protoplanetary disks that incorporates frequency-dependent absorption and scattering opacities via multigroup radiation transport and newly added radial rays for the stellar flux. Calibration is restricted to hydrostatic disk models to isolate radiative effects, yielding average equilibrium temperature differences from Monte Carlo benchmarks of 2--5% (64 bands) and 7--11% (3 bands), with a reported order-of-magnitude cost reduction when using fewer bands.

Significance. If the benchmark agreements hold, the work supplies a practical, frequency-dependent radiative module for disk simulations that captures vertical temperature gradients arising from opacity variations. Credit is given for the explicit quantitative comparison to independent Monte Carlo results, the demonstration of accuracy-cost trade-offs with band number, and the deliberate choice to benchmark in a hydrostatic setting before dynamical extensions.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that the framework 'provides a solid foundation for future self-consistent studies... including fully dynamical simulations' is forward-looking but unsupported by any dynamical test data; consider qualifying the language to reflect the hydrostatic calibration scope.
  2. [Methods (inferred from framework description)] The description of how the radial-ray method interfaces with the multigroup solver (including boundary conditions at the stellar source) lacks an explicit equation or pseudocode reference; adding this would improve reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript, including recognition of the quantitative Monte Carlo benchmarks, the accuracy-cost trade-offs with band number, and the choice to calibrate in hydrostatic models. We appreciate the recommendation for minor revision.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; validation against external benchmarks

full rationale

The paper's central result is a direct numerical comparison of equilibrium temperatures in hydrostatic models against independent Monte Carlo radiative-transfer benchmarks (2-5% average difference with 64 bands). This is an external calibration step, not an internal reduction. The hydrostatic restriction is explicitly framed as a deliberate isolation choice for calibration, without any claim that the error levels are derived from or forced by the paper's own equations. No self-definitional steps, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the derivation chain. The framework is presented as a code implementation whose accuracy is measured against outside references.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters or invented physical entities; relies on standard finite-volume numerical methods and external Monte Carlo benchmarks for validation. Number of frequency bands is a user choice tested at discrete values rather than fitted.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Standard assumptions of the Athena++ finite-volume radiation transport scheme
    The framework extends the existing code base without re-deriving its core discretization.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5827 in / 1119 out tokens · 21320 ms · 2026-06-27T17:39:16.197928+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

87 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    2020, ApJ, 905, 68, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abc1d6

    Barraza-Alfaro, M. 2020, ApJ, 905, 68, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abc1d6

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abc1d6 2020

  2. [2]

    The Disk Substructures at High Angular Resolution Project (DSHARP): I. Motivation, Sample, Calibration, and Overview

    Andrews, S. M., Huang, J., P´ erez, L. M., et al. 2018, ApJL, 869, L41, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aaf741

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aaf741 2018

  3. [3]

    M., & Fung, J

    Bailey, A., Stone, J. M., & Fung, J. 2024, MNRAS, 534, 1127, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae2126

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae2126 2024

  4. [4]

    Baronett, S. A. 2025, sabaronett/irrad disk: ApJ submission, v1.0.0 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.16934710

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.16934710 2025

  5. [5]

    2012, A&A, 539, A148, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201118136

    Birnstiel, T., Klahr, H., & Ercolano, B. 2012, A&A, 539, A148, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201118136

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201118136 2012

  6. [6]

    P., Zhu, Z., et al

    Birnstiel, T., Dullemond, C. P., Zhu, Z., et al. 2018, ApJL, 869, L45, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aaf743

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aaf743 2018

  7. [7]

    E., & Wood, K

    Bjorkman, J. E., & Wood, K. 2001, ApJ, 554, 615, doi: 10.1086/321336

    work page doi:10.1086/321336 2001

  8. [8]

    W., Rozyczka, M., & Tohline, J

    Bodenheimer, P., Yorke, H. W., Rozyczka, M., & Tohline, J. E. 1990, ApJ, 355, 651, doi: 10.1086/168798

    work page doi:10.1086/168798 1990

  9. [9]

    C., Durisen, R

    Boley, A. C., Durisen, R. H., Nordlund, ˚A., & Lord, J. 2007, ApJ, 665, 1254, doi: 10.1086/519767

    work page doi:10.1086/519767 2007

  10. [10]

    Bruls, J. H. M. J., Vollm¨ oller, P., & Sch¨ ussler, M. 1999, A&A, 348, 233

    1999

  11. [11]

    K., Bergin, E

    Calahan, J. K., Bergin, E. A., Zhang, K., et al. 2021, ApJS, 257, 17, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac143f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac143f 2021

  12. [12]

    Carlson, B. G. 1963, in Methods in Computational Physics, ed. B. Alder, S. Fernbach, & M. Rotenberg, Vol. 1 (New York: Academic Press), 1–42. https://vdoc.pub/documents/methods-in-computational- physics-vol-01-statistical-physics-iklre00kl640

    1963

  13. [13]

    I., & Goldreich, P

    Chiang, E. I., & Goldreich, P. 1997, ApJ, 490, 368, doi: 10.1086/304869

    work page doi:10.1086/304869 1997

  14. [14]

    M., et al

    Curone, P., Facchini, S., Andrews, S. M., et al. 2025, ApJL, 984, L9, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adc438 D’Alessio, P., Cant¨ o, J., Calvet, N., & Lizano, S. 1998, ApJ, 500, 411, doi: 10.1086/305702

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adc438 2025

  15. [15]

    W., & Gammie, C

    Davis, S. W., & Gammie, C. F. 2020, ApJ, 888, 94, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab5950

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab5950 2020

  16. [16]

    W., Stone, J

    Davis, S. W., Stone, J. M., & Jiang, Y.-F. 2012, ApJS, 199, 9, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/199/1/9

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/199/1/9 2012

  17. [17]

    Draine, B. T. 2003, ARA&A, 41, 241, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.41.011802.094840

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.41.011802.094840 2003

  18. [18]

    doi:10.48550/arXiv.2203.09759 , editor =

    Drazkowska, J., Bitsch, B., Lambrechts, M., et al. 2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 534, Protostars and Planets VII, ed. S. Inutsuka, Y. Aikawa, T. Muto, K. Tomida, & M. Tamura, 717, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2203.09759

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.09759 2023

  19. [19]

    Du, F., & Bergin, E. A. 2014, ApJ, 792, 2, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/792/1/2

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/792/1/2 2014

  20. [20]

    2002, Journal of Computational Physics, 180, 584, doi: 10.1006/jcph.2002.7106

    Dubroca, B., & Klar, A. 2002, Journal of Computational Physics, 180, 584, doi: 10.1006/jcph.2002.7106

    work page doi:10.1006/jcph.2002.7106 2002

  21. [21]

    P., & Dominik, C

    Dullemond, C. P., & Dominik, C. 2004, A&A, 421, 1075, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20040284

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20040284 2004

  22. [22]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20042080 , eprint =

    Dullemond, C. P., & Dominik, C. 2005, A&A, 434, 971, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20042080

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20042080 2005

  23. [23]

    P., Juhasz, A., Pohl, A., et al

    Dullemond, C. P., Juhasz, A., Pohl, A., et al. 2012, RADMC-3D: A multi-purpose radiative transfer tool,, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1202.015

    2012

  24. [24]

    An efficient algorithm for two-dimensional radiative transfer in axisymmetric circumstellar envelopes and disks

    Dullemond, C. P., & Turolla, R. 2000, A&A, 360, 1187, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0003456

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/0003456 2000

  25. [25]

    P., van Zadelhoff, G

    Dullemond, C. P., van Zadelhoff, G. J., & Natta, A. 2002, A&A, 389, 464, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20020608

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20020608 2002

  26. [26]

    M., Kokotanekova, R., & Samarasinha, N

    Espaillat, C., Muzerolle, J., Najita, J., et al. 2014, in Protostars and Planets VI, ed. H. Beuther, R. S. Klessen, C. P. Dullemond, & T. Henning, 497–520, doi: 10.2458/azu uapress 9780816531240-ch022 31

    work page doi:10.2458/azu 2014

  27. [27]

    2011, A&A, 534, A107, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201016068

    Fromang, S., Lyra, W., & Masset, F. 2011, A&A, 534, A107, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201016068

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201016068 2011

  28. [28]

    F., et al

    Galloway-Sprietsma, M., Bae, J., Izquierdo, A. F., et al. 2025, ApJL, 984, L10, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adc437

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adc437 2025

  29. [29]

    and Millman, K

    Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., et al. 2020, Nature, 585, 357, doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 2020

  30. [30]

    C., & Norman, M

    Hayes, J. C., & Norman, M. L. 2003, ApJS, 147, 197, doi: 10.1086/374658

    work page doi:10.1086/374658 2003

  31. [31]

    1996, A&A, 311, 291

    Henning, T., & Stognienko, R. 1996, A&A, 311, 291

    1996

  32. [32]

    G., & Greenstein, J

    Henyey, L. G., & Greenstein, J. L. 1941, ApJ, 93, 70, doi: 10.1086/144246

    work page doi:10.1086/144246 1941

  33. [33]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering, 9, 90, doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55

    work page doi:10.1109/mcse.2007.55 2007

  34. [34]

    2021, ApJS, 253, 49, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/abe303

    Jiang, Y.-F. 2021, ApJS, 253, 49, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/abe303

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/abe303 2021

  35. [35]

    2022, ApJS, 263, 4, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac9231

    Jiang, Y.-F. 2022, ApJS, 263, 4, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac9231

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac9231 2022

  36. [36]

    M., & Davis, S

    Jiang, Y.-F., Stone, J. M., & Davis, S. W. 2014, ApJS, 213, 7, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/213/1/7

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/213/1/7 2014

  37. [37]

    2006, A&A, 445, 747, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20053238

    Klahr, H., & Kley, W. 2006, A&A, 445, 747, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20053238

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20053238 2006

  38. [38]

    H., Henning, T., & Kley, W

    Klahr, H. H., Henning, T., & Kley, W. 1999, ApJ, 514, 325, doi: 10.1086/306926

    work page doi:10.1086/306926 1999

  39. [39]

    M., Youdin, A

    Krapp, L., Kratter, K. M., Youdin, A. N., et al. 2024, ApJ, 973, 153, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad644a

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad644a 2024

  40. [40]

    D., & Wolf, S

    Krieger, A., Klahr, H., Melon Fuksman, J. D., & Wolf, S. 2025, A&A, 694, A52, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451780

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451780 2025

  41. [41]

    R., Klein, R

    Krumholz, M. R., Klein, R. I., McKee, C. F., & Bolstad, J. 2007, ApJ, 667, 626, doi: 10.1086/520791

    work page doi:10.1086/520791 2007

  42. [42]

    R., & Thompson, T

    Krumholz, M. R., & Thompson, T. A. 2013, MNRAS, 434, 2329, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt1174

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1174 2013

  43. [43]

    2010, A&A, 511, A81, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200912355

    Henning, T. 2010, A&A, 511, A81, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200912355

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200912355 2010

  44. [44]

    Kuiper, R., & Klessen, R. S. 2013, A&A, 555, A7, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321404

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321404 2013

  45. [45]

    W., & Mignone, A

    Kuiper, R., Yorke, H. W., & Mignone, A. 2020, ApJS, 250, 13, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab9a36

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab9a36 2020

  46. [46]

    J., Teague, R., Loomis, R

    Law, C. J., Teague, R., Loomis, R. A., et al. 2021a, ApJS, 257, 4, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac1439

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac1439

  47. [47]

    J., Loomis, R

    Law, C. J., Loomis, R. A., Teague, R., et al. 2021b, ApJS, 257, 3, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac1434

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac1434

  48. [48]

    doi:10.48550/arXiv.2203.09821 , editor =

    Lesur, G., Flock, M., Ercolano, B., et al. 2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 534, Protostars and Planets VII, ed. S. Inutsuka, Y. Aikawa, T. Muto, K. Tomida, & M. Tamura, 465, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2203.09821

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.09821 2023

  49. [49]

    Levermore, C. D. 1984, JQSRT, 31, 149, doi: 10.1016/0022-4073(84)90112-2

    work page doi:10.1016/0022-4073(84)90112-2 1984

  50. [50]

    , keywords =

    Levermore, C. D., & Pomraning, G. C. 1981, ApJ, 248, 321, doi: 10.1086/159157

    work page doi:10.1086/159157 1981

  51. [51]

    Lucy, L. B. 1999, A&A, 344, 282

    1999

  52. [52]

    Lyra, W., & Umurhan, O. M. 2019, PASP, 131, 072001, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/aaf5ff

    work page doi:10.1088/1538-3873/aaf5ff 2019

  53. [53]

    Ma, J.-Z., Pakmor, R., Justham, S., & de Mink, S. E. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.16627, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2503.16627

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.16627 2025

  54. [54]

    , keywords =

    Mathis, J. S., Rumpl, W., & Nordsieck, K. H. 1977, ApJ, 217, 425, doi: 10.1086/155591 Melon Fuksman, D., Flock, M., Klahr, H., Mattia, G., &

    work page doi:10.1086/155591 1977

  55. [55]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2504.13999

    Muley, D. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2504.13999. https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.13999 Melon Fuksman, J. D., & Klahr, H. 2022, ApJ, 936, 16, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7fee

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac7fee 2025

  56. [56]

    2007, ApJS, 170, 228, doi: 10.1086/513316

    Mignone, A., Bodo, G., Massaglia, S., et al. 2007, ApJS, 170, 228, doi: 10.1086/513316

    work page doi:10.1086/513316 2007

  57. [57]

    Mihalas, D., & Mihalas, B. W. 1984, Foundations of radiation hydrodynamics (Oxford University Press)

    1984

  58. [58]

    , keywords =

    Muley, D., Melon Fuksman, J. D., & Klahr, H. 2024, A&A, 690, A355, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451554

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451554 2024

  59. [59]

    P., Gressel, O., & Umurhan, O

    Nelson, R. P., Gressel, O., & Umurhan, O. M. 2013, MNRAS, 435, 2610, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt1475

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1475 2013

  60. [60]

    M., & Sim, S

    Noebauer, U. M., & Sim, S. A. 2019, Living Reviews in Computational Astrophysics, 5, 1, doi: 10.1007/s41115-019-0004-9

    work page doi:10.1007/s41115-019-0004-9 2019

  61. [61]

    L., & Klahr, H

    Ober, F., Wolf, S., Uribe, A. L., & Klahr, H. H. 2015, A&A, 579, A105, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526117 ¨Oberg, K. I., & Bergin, E. A. 2021, PhR, 893, 1, doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2020.09.004 ¨Oberg, K. I., Guzm´ an, V. V., Walsh, C., et al. 2021, ApJS, 257, 1, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac1432

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526117 2015

  62. [62]

    2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Paardekooper, S., Dong, R., Duffell, P., et al. 2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 534, Protostars and Planets VII, ed. S. Inutsuka, Y. Aikawa, T. Muto, K. Tomida, & M. Tamura, 685, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2203.09595

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.09595 2023

  63. [63]

    , keywords =

    Pakmor, R., Bauer, A., & Springel, V. 2011, MNRAS, 418, 1392, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19591.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19591.x 2011

  64. [64]

    2004, A&A, 417, 793, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20040017

    Pascucci, I., Wolf, S., Steinacker, J., et al. 2004, A&A, 417, 793, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20040017

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20040017 2004

  65. [65]

    F., & Duchˆ ene, G

    Pinte, C., Fouchet, L., M´ enard, F., Gonzalez, J. F., & Duchˆ ene, G. 2007, A&A, 469, 963, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20077137

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20077137 2007

  66. [66]

    B., Hollenbach, D., Beckwith, S., et al

    Pollack, J. B., Hollenbach, D., Beckwith, S., et al. 1994, ApJ, 421, 615, doi: 10.1086/173677 Prˇ sa, A., Harmanec, P., Torres, G., et al. 2016, AJ, 152, 41, doi: 10.3847/0004-6256/152/2/41

    work page doi:10.1086/173677 1994

  67. [67]

    B., & Lightman, A

    Rybicki, G. B., & Lightman, A. P. 1979, Radiative processes in astrophysics (Wiley) 32

    1979

  68. [68]

    Turner, N. J. 2019, ApJ, 874, 26, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aafc36

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aafc36 2019

  69. [69]

    1978, Physical processes in the interstellar medium (New York: Wiley), doi: 10.1002/9783527617722

    Spitzer, L. 1978, Physical processes in the interstellar medium (New York: Wiley), doi: 10.1002/9783527617722

    work page doi:10.1002/9783527617722 1978

  70. [70]

    , keywords =

    Springel, V. 2010, MNRAS, 401, 791, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15715.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15715.x 2010

  71. [71]

    Simon, J. B. 2008, ApJS, 178, 137, doi: 10.1086/588755

    work page doi:10.1086/588755 2008

  72. [72]

    M., Tomida, K., White, C

    Stone, J. M., Tomida, K., White, C. J., & Felker, K. G. 2020, ApJS, 249, 4, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab929b

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab929b 2020

  73. [73]

    Takeuchi, T., & Lin, D. N. C. 2002, ApJ, 581, 1344, doi: 10.1086/344437

    work page doi:10.1086/344437 2002

  74. [74]

    2025, ApJL, 984, L6, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adc43b

    Teague, R., Benisty, M., Facchini, S., et al. 2025, ApJL, 984, L6, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adc43b

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adc43b 2025

  75. [75]

    J., & Stone, J

    Turner, N. J., & Stone, J. M. 2001, ApJS, 135, 95, doi: 10.1086/321779 van der Holst, B., T´ oth, G., Sokolov, I. V., et al. 2011, ApJS, 194, 23, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/194/2/23

    work page doi:10.1086/321779 2001

  76. [76]

    Vaytet, N. M. H., Audit, E., Dubroca, B., & Delahaye, F. 2011, JQSRT, 112, 1323, doi: 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2011.01.027

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jqsrt.2011.01.027 2011

  77. [77]

    T., Trapman, L., et al

    Vioque, M., Kurtovic, N. T., Trapman, L., et al. 2025, ApJ, 989, 9, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adc7b0

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adc7b0 2025

  78. [78]

    E., et al

    Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., et al. 2020, Nature Methods, 17, 261, doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 2020

  79. [79]

    G., & Brandt, R

    Warren, S. G., & Brandt, R. E. 2008, Journal of Geophysical Research (Atmospheres), 113, D14220, doi: 10.1029/2007JD009744

    work page doi:10.1029/2007jd009744 2008

  80. [80]

    R., Olivares, H., & Rezzolla, L

    Weih, L. R., Olivares, H., & Rezzolla, L. 2020, MNRAS, 495, 2285, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa1297

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1297 2020

Showing first 80 references.