pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.12167 · v1 · pith:LBNNLC3Anew · submitted 2026-06-10 · 💻 cs.GT

Shared Infrastructure Investment and Pricing: Stackelberg Equilibria in Risk-Aware Take-or-Pay Contracts

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 07:44 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.GT
keywords Stackelberg equilibriumgeneralized Nash equilibriumCVaRtake-or-pay contractsinfrastructure pricingrisk aversionMobile Edge Computing
0
0 comments X

The pith

A Stackelberg game yields an equilibrium where an infrastructure provider optimizes capacity and pricing against risk-averse firms committing to usage under revenue uncertainty.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper models shared infrastructure investment where one provider acts as leader to choose capacity and access prices that recover large upfront costs from firms facing uncertain revenues. Multiple firms act as followers that choose resource commitments influenced by pricing, costs, congestion, and exogenous factors, with their heterogeneous risk aversion captured by CVaR; their joint decisions form a generalized Nash equilibrium. The authors prove that a Stackelberg equilibrium exists in this setting, supply a polynomial-time algorithm that finds an approximate equilibrium with a bounded optimality gap, and derive a lower bound on the firms' probability of profit. Monte Carlo simulations of a mobile edge computing scenario show that greater follower risk aversion produces smaller deployed capacity, lower prices, lower leader profit, and higher follower profit probability.

Core claim

In the Stackelberg game with risk-aware take-or-pay contracting, the infrastructure provider jointly optimizes capacity dimensioning and access pricing while the firms optimize their resource usage commitments under CVaR, and the existence of an equilibrium is established in which the followers' decisions constitute a generalized Nash equilibrium; an approximate equilibrium can be computed in polynomial time with bounded gap, and a lower bound holds on followers' Probability of Profit.

What carries the argument

The Stackelberg game in which the InP leader jointly optimizes capacity dimensioning and access pricing while the CVaR-using firms as followers commit to future resource usage under uncertain revenues and congestion costs, with their responses forming a generalized Nash equilibrium.

If this is right

  • Existence of the equilibrium lets the provider plan capacity knowing that firms will settle on stable usage commitments.
  • The polynomial-time algorithm makes near-optimal pricing and capacity decisions feasible to compute for practical contract design.
  • The lower bound on Probability of Profit supplies firms with a guaranteed minimum chance of positive profit under the take-or-pay terms.
  • Higher follower risk aversion produces strictly smaller optimal capacity, lower prices, and lower leader profit.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same leader-follower structure with CVaR could be tested on shared cloud or energy infrastructure with similar revenue uncertainty.
  • If real revenue distributions deviate from the modeled uncertainty, the computed equilibrium and PoP bound would need recalibration.
  • Regulators could examine whether the derived lower bound on firm profit probability is high enough to encourage participation in shared infrastructure.

Load-bearing premise

The model assumes that firms' resource usage is jointly influenced by exogenous factors, infrastructure pricing, operational costs, and resource congestion, with heterogeneous risk aversion captured exactly by CVaR, allowing the followers' problem to form a generalized Nash equilibrium.

What would settle it

A specific numerical instance of the MEC setting in which no Stackelberg equilibrium exists or in which the polynomial-time algorithm produces a solution whose optimality gap exceeds the claimed bound.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.12167 by Amal Sakr, Andrea Araldo, Tamer Ba\c{s}ar, Tijani Chahed.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: InP profit under different risk classes and CVs. RN MRA HRA ERA SP risk class 60 70 80 90 100 C * ( v C o r e s ) CV = 25% CV = 50% CV = 75% CV = 100% [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Optimal capacity C ∗ under different risk classes and CVs. RN MRA HRA ERA SP risk class 40 50 60 70 * ( $ / v C o r e - h o u r ) CV = 25% CV = 50% CV = 75% CV = 100% [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Lower bound on the PoP νˆi under different SP risk classes and CVs. realizations harder to absorb. For SP 2 and SP 3, the lower bound is sensitive to CV mainly under risk neutrality, whereas once they become risk-averse it remains almost unchanged and close to one across all CV levels. Overall, we show that CVaR-based risk aversion strengthens the PoP, while high revenue uncertainty primarily hurts SP 1. A… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: InP profit when one SP changes risk class at CV = 100%. RN MRA HRA ERA Risk class assigned to changing SP SP 1 changes SP 2 MRA SP 3 MRA SP status 0.29 0.36 0.40 0.49 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 L o w e r b o u n d [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Lower bound when SP 2 changes risk class at CV = 100%. RN MRA HRA ERA Risk class assigned to changing SP SP 1 MRA SP 2 MRA SP 3 changes SP status 0.36 0.36 0.38 0.39 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.36 0.91 0.91 0.99 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 L o w e r b o u n d [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: InP profit and capacity–pricing decisions for 3 and 10 SPs under varying [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Lower bound on the PoP for 3 and 10 SPs under heterogeneous risk classes [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_11.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We study a shared infrastructure deployed by an Infrastructure Provider (InP) and used by multiple firms that generate revenues through resource usage. We focus on a challenging setting where: (i) infrastructure deployment requires substantial upfront investment, which the InP must recover via payments by firms that depend on their uncertain future revenues; (ii) firms' resource usage is jointly influenced by exogenous factors, infrastructure pricing, operational costs, and resource congestion; and (iii) firms exhibit heterogeneous risk aversion. This setting is typical in emerging technologies, e.g., Mobile Edge Computing (MEC). We formalize this setting as a novel Stackelberg game with risk-aware take-or-pay contracting and firm-side operational and congestion costs, in which the InP acts as the leader and jointly optimizes capacity dimensioning and access pricing, while firms act as followers that share the infrastructure and commit upfront to future resource usage under uncertain revenues. Followers' heterogeneous risk aversion is modeled through Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR). We prove the existence of a Stackelberg equilibrium (SE), in which the followers' decisions constitute a generalized Nash equilibrium, and develop a polynomial-time algorithm that computes an approximate SE with a bounded optimality gap. We also derive a lower bound on the followers' Probability of Profit (PoP). Monte Carlo simulations for a MEC case study show that higher followers' risk aversion reduces infrastructure capacity, pricing, and leader profit, while increasing followers' PoP.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper studies shared infrastructure investment and pricing in a Stackelberg game setting with risk-aware take-or-pay contracts. The infrastructure provider acts as the leader optimizing capacity dimensioning and access pricing, while multiple firms with heterogeneous risk aversion (modeled by CVaR) act as followers committing to resource usage under revenue uncertainty, with operational and congestion costs. The authors prove the existence of a Stackelberg equilibrium where followers' decisions form a generalized Nash equilibrium, develop a polynomial-time algorithm for an approximate SE with bounded optimality gap, derive a lower bound on the followers' Probability of Profit (PoP), and present Monte Carlo simulations for a Mobile Edge Computing case study showing the impact of risk aversion on capacity, pricing, leader profit, and PoP.

Significance. If the theoretical results hold, this paper makes a contribution to the literature on game-theoretic models for infrastructure sharing in emerging technologies such as MEC. The proof of SE existence under GNE with CVaR, the poly-time approximate algorithm with bounded gap, and the PoP lower bound are notable strengths. The simulations provide empirical support for the model's implications regarding risk aversion effects. These elements could inform both theoretical advancements and practical contract design in shared infrastructure settings.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that the algorithm computes an approximate SE 'with a bounded optimality gap' but provides no indication of the gap's functional form or dependence on problem parameters; adding this detail would strengthen the claim of a polynomial-time result.
  2. [Model section (inferred from abstract description)] The model formalization assumes that the followers' problem constitutes a generalized Nash equilibrium under the joint effects of exogenous factors, pricing, costs, and congestion; an explicit statement of the convexity or compactness conditions used to guarantee existence would aid verification.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive summary, significance assessment, and recommendation of minor revision. No specific major comments were raised in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper presents a theoretical Stackelberg game model with CVaR risk aversion, proves existence of equilibrium (followers forming GNE), develops a polynomial-time approximation algorithm with bounded gap, and derives a PoP lower bound. These are standard mathematical derivations and proofs that do not reduce by construction to fitted parameters, self-definitions, or load-bearing self-citations. The model formalization and MEC simulations provide independent content supporting the claims, making the derivation self-contained against external game-theoretic benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract provides no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; all modeling elements (CVaR, congestion costs, take-or-pay) are described at a high level without numerical fits or new postulates.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5813 in / 1263 out tokens · 23574 ms · 2026-06-27T07:44:31.685719+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

255 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems , volume=

    A cooperative Stackelberg game based energy management considering price discrimination and risk assessment , author=. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

  2. [2]

    IEEE Internet of Things Journal , volume=

    A Stackelberg-game-based framework for edge pricing and resource allocation in mobile edge computing , author=. IEEE Internet of Things Journal , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

  3. [3]

    Annals of Operations Research , pages=

    A strategic options game approach to support PPP investment decisions under risk-sharing mechanisms , author=. Annals of Operations Research , pages=. 2024 , publisher=

  4. [4]

    IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology , volume=

    A robust Stackelberg game for cyber-security investment in networked control systems , author=. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

  5. [5]

    Electric Power Systems Research , volume=

    An agent-based Stackelberg framework for joint expansion planning of privately Owned regional energy systems and sub-transmission grid , author=. Electric Power Systems Research , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

  6. [6]

    IEEE Access , volume=

    Analysis of strategic renewable energy, grid and storage capacity investments via Stackelberg-cournot modelling , author=. IEEE Access , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

  7. [7]

    Entropy , volume=

    Applying the bayesian stackelberg active deception game for securing infrastructure networks , author=. Entropy , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

  8. [8]

    Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control , volume=

    Coinvestment games under uncertainty , author=. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

  9. [9]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.12059 , year=

    Co-Investment with Payoff-Sharing Mechanism for Cooperative Decision-Making in Network Design Games , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.12059 , year=

  10. [10]

    Wireless Networks , volume=

    Computation offloading and pricing in mobile edge computing based on Stackelberg game , author=. Wireless Networks , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

  11. [11]

    Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing , volume=

    Coordination of co-investments in supply chain infrastructure , author=. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing , volume=. 2012 , publisher=

  12. [12]

    IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society , volume=

    Dynamic pricing in multi-tenant mano with resource sharing: A stackelberg game approach , author=. IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

  13. [13]

    Financial Management , pages=

    Infrastructure investment as a real options game: The case of European airport expansion , author=. Financial Management , pages=. 2003 , publisher=

  14. [14]

    IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution , volume=

    Merchant and regulated storage investment in energy and reserve markets: A Stackelberg game , author=. IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

  15. [15]

    IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications , volume=

    Optimal location and pricing of electric vehicle charging stations using machine learning and Stackelberg game , author=. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

  16. [16]

    IEEE systems journal , volume=

    Price and risk awareness for data offloading decision-making in edge computing systems , author=. IEEE systems journal , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

  17. [17]

    Mathematics , volume=

    Protecting Infrastructure Networks: Solving the Stackelberg Game with Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Number Payoffs , author=. Mathematics , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

  18. [18]

    Digital Communications and Networks , volume=

    SDN assisted Stackelberg Game model for LTE-WiFi offloading in 5G networks , author=. Digital Communications and Networks , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

  19. [19]

    Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications , volume=

    Stackelberg game in critical infrastructures from a network science perspective , author=. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

  20. [20]

    Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science , volume=

    Stackelberg game under asymmetric information in critical infrastructure system: From a complex network perspective , author=. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

  21. [21]

    ICC 2019-2019 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC) , pages=

    Stackelberg game-based network slicing for joint wireless access and backhaul resource allocation , author=. ICC 2019-2019 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC) , pages=. 2019 , organization=

  22. [22]

    ACM Transactions on Algorithms (TALG) , volume=

    The effectiveness of Stackelberg strategies and tolls for network congestion games , author=. ACM Transactions on Algorithms (TALG) , volume=. 2012 , publisher=

  23. [23]

    Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications , volume=

    Three-stage Stackelberg game based edge computing resource management for mobile blockchain , author=. Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

  24. [24]

    Frontiers in environmental science , volume=

    A Bayesian decision model for optimum investment and design of low-impact development in urban stormwater infrastructure and management , author=. Frontiers in environmental science , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

  25. [25]

    IEEE Communications Letters , volume=

    Efficient risk-averse request allocation for multi-access edge computing , author=. IEEE Communications Letters , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

  26. [26]

    Modeling risks in infrastructure asset management , author=

  27. [27]

    IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control , volume=

    Risk-averse decision making under uncertainty , author=. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

  28. [28]

    IEEE Internet of Things Journal , volume=

    Risk-averse investment strategy for MEC service provisioning: A data-driven distributionally robust solution , author=. IEEE Internet of Things Journal , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

  29. [29]

    IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking , volume=

    Risk-aware data offloading in multi-server multi-access edge computing environment , author=. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

  30. [30]

    Innovative Infrastructure Solutions , volume=

    Risk-based decision-making for infrastructure systems under extreme events , author=. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

  31. [31]

    Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

    Risk-sensitive and robust decision-making: a cvar optimization approach , author=. Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

  32. [32]

    IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing , volume=

    Towards risk-averse edge computing with deep reinforcement learning , author=. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

  33. [33]

    IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid , volume=

    Dependable demand response management in the smart grid: A Stackelberg game approach , author=. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

  34. [34]

    IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing , year=

    Distributed offloading in multi-access edge computing systems: A mean-field perspective , author=. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing , year=

  35. [35]

    Journal of optimization theory and applications , volume=

    A Stackelberg network game with a large number of followers , author=. Journal of optimization theory and applications , volume=. 2002 , publisher=

  36. [36]

    Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM , volume=

    Revenue-maximizing pricing and capacity expansion in a many-users regime , author=. Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM , volume=. 2002 , organization=

  37. [37]

    Proceedings of the 38th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (Cat

    Agent mobility under price incentives , author=. Proceedings of the 38th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (Cat. No. 99CH36304) , volume=. 1999 , organization=

  38. [38]

    Dynamic Games and Applications , volume=

    Incentive designs for Stackelberg games with a large number of followers and their mean-field limits , author=. Dynamic Games and Applications , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

  39. [39]

    IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications , volume=

    Optimal nonlinear pricing for a monopolistic network service provider with complete and incomplete information , author=. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications , volume=. 2007 , publisher=

  40. [40]

    Telecommunication Systems , volume=

    Pricing under information asymmetry for a large population of users , author=. Telecommunication Systems , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

  41. [41]

    4or , volume=

    Generalized Nash equilibrium problems , author=. 4or , volume=. 2007 , publisher=

  42. [42]

    Resource and Energy Economics , volume=

    Coupled constraint Nash equilibria in environmental games , author=. Resource and Energy Economics , volume=. 2005 , publisher=

  43. [43]

    Games and Economic Behavior , volume=

    A variational inequality framework for network games: Existence, uniqueness, convergence and sensitivity analysis , author=. Games and Economic Behavior , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

  44. [44]

    Operations Research Letters , volume=

    Mathematical programs with multiobjective generalized nash equilibrium problems in the constraints , author=. Operations Research Letters , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

  45. [45]

    2022 IEEE 61st Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) , pages=

    A Stackelberg game for incentive-based demand response in energy markets , author=. 2022 IEEE 61st Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) , pages=. 2022 , organization=

  46. [46]

    Set-valued and variational analysis , volume=

    A shared-constraint approach to multi-leader multi-follower games , author=. Set-valued and variational analysis , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

  47. [47]

    IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications , volume=

    Stackelberg game for distributed time scheduling in RF-powered backscatter cognitive radio networks , author=. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

  48. [48]

    Automatica , volume=

    On the variational equilibrium as a refinement of the generalized Nash equilibrium , author=. Automatica , volume=. 2012 , publisher=

  49. [49]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.05388 , year=

    A distributed primal-dual algorithm for computation of generalized Nash equilibria with shared affine coupling constraints via operator splitting methods , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.05388 , year=

  50. [50]

    IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control , volume=

    An existence result for hierarchical Stackelberg v/s Stackelberg games , author=. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

  51. [51]

    Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications , volume=

    Existence and uniqueness of open-loop Stackelberg equilibria in linear-quadratic differential games , author=. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications , volume=. 2001 , publisher=

  52. [52]

    The Indian Economic Journal , volume=

    On The Stackelberg Equilibrium Existence, Uniqueness and Stability , author=. The Indian Economic Journal , volume=. 1998 , publisher=

  53. [53]

    Mathematical Programming , pages=

    Robust stackelberg equilibria , author=. Mathematical Programming , pages=. 2025 , publisher=

  54. [54]

    Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications , volume=

    Sequential Stackelberg equilibria in two-person games , author=. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications , volume=. 1988 , publisher=

  55. [55]

    Carpathian Journal of Mathematics , volume=

    A Stackelberg quasi-equilibrium problem via quasi-variational inequalities , author=. Carpathian Journal of Mathematics , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

  56. [56]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.05732 , year=

    Computing algorithm for an equilibrium of the generalized Stackelberg game , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.05732 , year=

  57. [57]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

    Convex-concave min-max Stackelberg games , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

  58. [58]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.08161 , year=

    Finding a Multiple Follower Stackelberg Equilibrium: A Fully First-Order Method , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.08161 , year=

  59. [59]

    International conference on machine learning , pages=

    Implicit learning dynamics in stackelberg games: Equilibria characterization, convergence analysis, and empirical study , author=. International conference on machine learning , pages=. 2020 , organization=

  60. [60]

    Optimization , volume=

    Lower Stackelberg equilibria: from bilevel optimization to Stackelberg games , author=. Optimization , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

  61. [61]

    Journal of Global Optimization , volume=

    Stackelberg equilibria via variational inequalities and projections , author=. Journal of Global Optimization , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

  62. [62]

    The case of zero fixed costs , author=

    Stackelberg equilibrium with many leaders and followers. The case of zero fixed costs , author=. Research in Economics , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

  63. [63]

    Protection and Control of Modern Power Systems , volume=

    Bi-level stackelberg game-based distribution system expansion planning model considering long-term renewable energy contracts , author=. Protection and Control of Modern Power Systems , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

  64. [64]

    Energies , volume=

    Co-operative optimization framework for energy management considering CVaR assessment and game theory , author=. Energies , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

  65. [65]

    Operations Research , volume=

    Dynamic risked equilibrium , author=. Operations Research , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

  66. [66]

    2009 International Conference on Game Theory for Networks , pages=

    N-player cournot and price-quantity function mixed competition , author=. 2009 International Conference on Game Theory for Networks , pages=. 2009 , organization=

  67. [67]

    1998 , publisher=

    Dynamic noncooperative game theory , author=. 1998 , publisher=

  68. [68]

    Mathematical Programming , volume=

    Equilibrium, uncertainty and risk in hydro-thermal electricity systems , author=. Mathematical Programming , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

  69. [69]

    2024 American Control Conference (ACC) , pages=

    Learning of nash equilibria in risk-averse games , author=. 2024 American Control Conference (ACC) , pages=. 2024 , organization=

  70. [70]

    Sustainability , volume=

    Research on risk avoidance and coordination of supply chain subject based on blockchain technology , author=. Sustainability , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

  71. [71]

    Environment, Development and Sustainability , volume=

    Risk aversion in green energy-efficient vehicle-petrol supply chain based on C-VaR model with government intervention: a game theoretic approach , author=. Environment, Development and Sustainability , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

  72. [72]

    Risk-Averse Equilibrium for Autonomous Vehicles in Stochastic Congestion Games , author=

  73. [73]

    International conference on machine learning , pages=

    Risk-averse no-regret learning in online convex games , author=. International conference on machine learning , pages=. 2022 , organization=

  74. [74]

    PloS one , volume=

    Stackelberg game of buyback policy in supply chain with a risk-averse retailer and a risk-averse supplier based on CVaR , author=. PloS one , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

  75. [75]

    European Journal of Operational Research , volume=

    On noncooperative oligopoly equilibrium in the multiple leader--follower game , author=. European Journal of Operational Research , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

  76. [76]

    Operations Research Letters , volume=

    On generalized Nash games and variational inequalities , author=. Operations Research Letters , volume=. 2007 , publisher=

  77. [77]

    2021 IEEE global communications conference (GLOBECOM) , pages=

    A framework for joint admission control, resource allocation and pricing for network slicing in 5G , author=. 2021 IEEE global communications conference (GLOBECOM) , pages=. 2021 , organization=

  78. [78]

    Journal of risk , volume=

    Optimization of conditional value-at-risk , author=. Journal of risk , volume=

  79. [79]

    2016 , publisher=

    Understanding analysis , author=. 2016 , publisher=

  80. [80]

    2003 , publisher=

    Finite-dimensional variational inequalities and complementarity problems , author=. 2003 , publisher=

Showing first 80 references.