pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.13077 · v1 · pith:2ZH5PPPRnew · submitted 2026-06-11 · ✦ hep-ph

A generalised-k_t jet algorithm for Deep Inelastic Scattering

Melissa van Beekveld , Silvia Ferrario Ravasio , Alexander Karlberg , Darcy Peake This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 06:43 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords jet algorithmDeep Inelastic ScatteringBreit framegeneralised k_tstruck quarkhadronisationCentauro algorithm
0
0 comments X

The pith

An inclusive generalised-k_t jet algorithm for Deep Inelastic Scattering is defined in the Breit frame to identify the struck quark jet.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a family of inclusive jet algorithms for Deep Inelastic Scattering that generalize the k_t clustering with a tunable parameter p controlling transverse-momentum weighting. These algorithms are formulated in the Breit frame and include a jet radius R. The authors examine their use for tagging the jet from the struck quark, measure sensitivity to hadronisation, and compare performance against the Centauro algorithm. The p=0 angular-ordered member of the family already supports observables with simple all-order perturbative structure.

Core claim

The authors introduce an inclusive generalised-k_t jet algorithm defined in the Breit frame, governed by the usual parameter p and a jet radius R, and implemented in fjcontrib. The angular-ordered p=0 version can formulate observables with simple all-order structures. The work investigates phenomenological applications to struck-quark jet identification and evaluates sensitivity to non-perturbative effects such as hadronisation, with explicit comparisons to the Centauro algorithm.

What carries the argument

The generalised-k_t clustering algorithm with parameter p, defined in the Breit frame for DIS events.

If this is right

  • The p=0 member permits observables whose all-order structure remains simple.
  • The algorithms can be applied directly to tag the jet associated with the struck quark.
  • Their response to hadronisation can be quantified and compared with existing methods.
  • Direct comparisons with the Centauro algorithm become possible within the same framework.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The Breit-frame definition may reduce frame-choice ambiguities that affect jet reconstruction in other DIS analyses.
  • Varying p continuously could allow optimisation of jet tagging efficiency versus background rejection in precision DIS measurements.
  • Availability in fjcontrib makes the family immediately usable inside standard parton-shower generators for further validation studies.

Load-bearing premise

Defining the algorithm in the Breit frame and extending the p=0 case to general p yields useful phenomenological improvements for struck-quark jet identification.

What would settle it

A side-by-side comparison on the same DIS Monte Carlo samples in which the new algorithms show no gain in struck-quark jet purity or no reduction in hadronisation uncertainty relative to the Centauro algorithm.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.13077 by Alexander Karlberg, Darcy Peake, Melissa van Beekveld, Silvia Ferrario Ravasio.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Normalised Breit-frame energy distribution of the final-state macrojet [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: From left to right, we show the jet and jet boundaries for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The z − η-plane for all jets constructed with the Centauro (pink), C/A (orange), kt (green) and anti-kt (blue) algorithms for R0 = 2/3 (left) and R0 = 1 (right), using Eq. (24). The solid (dashed) curves correspond to 68% (95%) of the jets, in terms of their density in the z − η-plane. tends to produce smaller jets with similar-sized jet radius parameter R0. This is a con￾sequence of a general property of … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Normalised energy distribution of the final-state macrojet in the Breit [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Similar to Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Normalised energy (first row), zjet (second row) and qT (third row) dis￾tributions of the final-state macrojet in the Breit frame for the C/A (first column), kt (second column), anti-kt (third column), and Centauro (fourth column) jet al￾gorithms, with R0 = 2/3. We show results at the parton shower level (labeled PS, dotted), parton shower with beam remnants (labeled PS+remn, dashed), and parton shower wit… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We introduce an inclusive generalised-$k_t$ jet algorithm for Deep Inelastic Scattering, defined in the Breit frame and implemented in fjcontrib. The family of algorithms is governed by the usual parameter $p$, which controls the transverse-momentum dependence of the algorithm, as well as by a jet radius parameter $R$. The angular-ordered ($p=0$) version of the algorithm was already presented by some of us, and can be used to formulate observables with simple all-order structures. In this article we investigate phenomenological applications of the algorithms related to the identification of the jet associated with the struck quark, and assess their sensitivity to non-perturbative effects, such as hadronisation. We also perform comparisons with the recent Centauro algorithm.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper introduces an inclusive generalised-k_t jet algorithm for Deep Inelastic Scattering defined in the Breit frame, governed by the usual parameter p (controlling transverse-momentum dependence) and jet radius R, and implemented in fjcontrib. It extends prior work on the angular-ordered (p=0) case, which admits simple all-order structures, and performs a phenomenological investigation of struck-quark jet identification, sensitivity to non-perturbative effects such as hadronisation, and comparisons with the Centauro algorithm.

Significance. The public implementation in fjcontrib is a clear strength that enables reproducible use by the community. If the phenomenological studies demonstrate concrete advantages in struck-quark tagging or reduced non-perturbative sensitivity relative to existing algorithms, the work would supply a practical tool for precision jet analyses in DIS at facilities such as the EIC.

minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that the algorithms are investigated for struck-quark jet identification and non-perturbative sensitivity, but the manuscript should explicitly state the quantitative figures of merit (e.g., tagging efficiency, purity, or hadronisation corrections) used to reach conclusions.
  2. Ensure that all plots comparing the new algorithm family to Centauro include error bands or statistical uncertainties so that differences can be assessed for significance.
  3. Notation for the distance measure in the generalised-k_t clustering should be written out explicitly once in the main text (even if standard) to aid readers unfamiliar with the p-parameter family.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their report, positive assessment of the work, and recommendation for minor revision. No major comments were raised.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: algorithmic definition, not a derived prediction

full rationale

The paper's core contribution is the explicit definition of a generalised-k_t family (parameter p and radius R) in the Breit frame for inclusive DIS jet finding, together with its implementation. This is a constructive act rather than a derivation whose outputs reduce to its inputs by construction. The p=0 case is cited as prior work by overlapping authors, but the extension to general p and the phenomenological study are presented as new; neither relies on a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction nor on a self-citation chain that forbids alternatives. No equations or claims in the provided text exhibit self-definitional, fitted-input, or uniqueness-imported circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review provides no information on free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the algorithm parameters p and R are user inputs rather than fitted quantities.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5657 in / 1063 out tokens · 17107 ms · 2026-06-27T06:43:15.372521+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Centauric 1-Jettiness in DIS and Universal Power Corrections

    hep-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Introduces Centauric 1-jettiness in DIS, derives N3LL resummation matched to NLO, and establishes universal non-perturbative power corrections scaling as 1/R via reduction to rescaled hemisphere soft function.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 30 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Abtet al.,Measurement of jet production in deep inelastic scattering and NNLO determination of the strong coupling at ZEUS, Eur

    I. Abtet al.,Measurement of jet production in deep inelastic scattering and NNLO determination of the strong coupling at ZEUS, Eur. Phys. J. C83(11), 1082 (2023), doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-12180-9,2309.02889

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-12180-9 2023

  2. [2]

    Andreevet al.,Unbinned deep learning jet substructure measurement in high Q2ep collisions at HERA, Phys

    V. Andreevet al.,Unbinned deep learning jet substructure measurement in high Q2ep collisions at HERA, Phys. Lett. B844, 138101 (2023), doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2023.138101,2303.13620

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2023.138101 2023

  3. [3]

    Abtet al.,The azimuthal correlation between the leading jet and the scattered lepton in deep inelastic scattering at HERA, Eur

    I. Abtet al.,The azimuthal correlation between the leading jet and the scattered lepton in deep inelastic scattering at HERA, Eur. Phys. J. C84(12), 1334 (2024), doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13547-2,2406.01430

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13547-2 2024

  4. [4]

    Andreevet al.,Observation and differential cross section measurement of neutral current DIS events with an empty hemisphere in the Breit frame, Eur

    V. Andreevet al.,Observation and differential cross section measurement of neutral current DIS events with an empty hemisphere in the Breit frame, Eur. Phys. J. C 84(7), 720 (2024), doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13003-1,2403.08982

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13003-1 2024

  5. [5]

    Andreevet al.,Measurement of the 1-jettiness event shape observable in deep- inelastic electron-proton scattering at HERA, Eur

    V. Andreevet al.,Measurement of the 1-jettiness event shape observable in deep- inelastic electron-proton scattering at HERA, Eur. Phys. J. C84(8), 785 (2024), doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13115-8,2403.10109

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13115-8 2024

  6. [6]

    Andreevet al.,Measurement of groomed event shape observables in deep- inelastic electron-proton scattering at HERA, Eur

    V. Andreevet al.,Measurement of groomed event shape observables in deep- inelastic electron-proton scattering at HERA, Eur. Phys. J. C84(7), 718 (2024), doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12987-0,2403.10134

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12987-0 2024

  7. [7]

    Arratia, Y

    M. Arratia, Y. Makris, D. Neill, F. Ringer and N. Sato,Asymmetric jet clustering in deep-inelastic scattering, Phys. Rev. D104(3), 034005 (2021), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.034005,2006.10751. 18 SciPost Physics Submission

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.034005 2021

  8. [8]

    van Beekveld and S

    M. van Beekveld and S. Ferrario Ravasio,Next-to-leading-logarithmic PanScales show- ers for Deep Inelastic Scattering and Vector Boson Fusion, JHEP02, 001 (2024), doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2024)001,2305.08645

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep02(2024)001 2024

  9. [9]

    Caucal, E

    P. Caucal, E. Iancu, A. H. Mueller and F. Yuan,Jet Definition and Transverse- Momentum–Dependent Factorization in Semi-inclusive Deep-Inelastic Scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett.134(6), 061903 (2025), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.061903, 2408.03129

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.134.061903 2025

  10. [10]

    Makris,Revisiting the role of grooming in DIS, Phys

    Y. Makris,Revisiting the role of grooming in DIS, Phys. Rev. D103(5), 054005 (2021), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.054005,2101.02708

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.054005 2021

  11. [11]

    Knobbe, D

    M. Knobbe, D. Reichelt and S. Schumann,(N)NLO+NLL’ accurate predictions for plain and groomed 1-jettiness in neutral current DIS, JHEP09, 194 (2023), doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2023)194,2306.17736

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep09(2023)194 2023

  12. [12]

    Fang, M.-S

    S. Fang, M.-S. Gao, H. T. Li and D. Y. Shao,N 3LL +O α2 s predictions of lepton- jet azimuthal angular distribution in deep-inelastic scattering, JHEP01, 029 (2025), doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2025)029,2409.09248

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep01(2025)029 2025

  13. [13]

    Cao, Z.-B

    H. Cao, Z.-B. Kang, X. Liu and S. Mantry,One-jettiness DIS event shape at N 3LL +O α2 s , Phys. Rev. D110(1), 014045 (2024), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.014045, 2401.01941

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.014045 2024

  14. [14]

    J.-H. Ee, D. Kang, C. Lee and I. W. Stewart,Precision DIS thrust predictions for HERA and EIC, JHEP07, 240 (2025), doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2025)240,2504.05234

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep07(2025)240 2025

  15. [15]

    van Beekveld, L

    M. van Beekveld, L. Buonocore, S. Ferrario Ravasio, P. F. Monni, A. Soto-Ontoso and G. Soyez,A new suite of Lund-tree observables to resolve jets(2025),2511.16723

    arXiv 2025

  16. [16]

    Resummation of thrust distributions in DIS

    V. Antonelli, M. Dasgupta and G. P. Salam,Resummation of thrust distributions in DIS, JHEP02, 001 (2000), doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2000/02/001,hep-ph/9912488

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2000/02/001 2000

  17. [17]

    Resummation of the jet broadening in DIS

    M. Dasgupta and G. P. Salam,Resummation of the jet broadening in DIS, Eur. Phys. J. C24, 213 (2002), doi:10.1007/s100520200915,hep-ph/0110213

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s100520200915 2002

  18. [18]

    Event shapes in e+e- annihilation and deep inelastic scattering

    M. Dasgupta and G. P. Salam,Event shapes ine +e− annihilation and deep in- elastic scattering, J. Phys. G30, R143 (2004), doi:10.1088/0954-3899/30/5/R01, hep-ph/0312283

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0954-3899/30/5/r01 2004

  19. [19]

    D. Kang, C. Lee and I. W. Stewart,Using 1-Jettiness to Measure 2 Jets in DIS 3 Ways, Phys. Rev. D88, 054004 (2013), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.88.054004, 1303.6952

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.88.054004 2013

  20. [20]

    Z.-B. Kang, X. Liu and S. Mantry,1-jettiness DIS event shape: NNLL+NLO results, Phys. Rev. D90(1), 014041 (2014), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.90.014041,1312.0301

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.90.014041 2014

  21. [21]

    Z. Chu, Y. Wang, J.-H. Ee, J. Chen and D. Kang,I-jettiness with jet axis at O(α s) in deep inelastic scattering, JHEP06, 111 (2022), doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2022)111, 2202.08040

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep06(2022)111 2022

  22. [22]

    Agostiniet al.,The Large Hadron–Electron Collider at the HL-LHC, J

    P. Agostiniet al.,The Large Hadron–Electron Collider at the HL-LHC, J. Phys. G 48(11), 110501 (2021), doi:10.1088/1361-6471/abf3ba,2007.14491

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6471/abf3ba 2021

  23. [23]

    Electron Ion Collider: The Next QCD Frontier - Understanding the glue that binds us all

    A. Accardiet al.,Electron Ion Collider: The Next QCD Frontier: Understanding the glue that binds us all, Eur. Phys. J. A52(9), 268 (2016), doi:10.1140/epja/i2016- 16268-9,1212.1701. 19 SciPost Physics Submission

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epja/i2016- 2016

  24. [24]

    Abdul Khaleket al.,Science Requirements and Detector Concepts for the Electron-Ion Collider: EIC Yellow Report, Nucl

    R. Abdul Khaleket al.,Science Requirements and Detector Concepts for the Electron-Ion Collider: EIC Yellow Report, Nucl. Phys. A1026, 122447 (2022), doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2022.122447,2103.05419

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2022.122447 2022

  25. [25]

    The anti-k_t jet clustering algorithm

    M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam and G. Soyez,The anti-k t jet clustering algorithm, JHEP 04, 063 (2008), doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/04/063,0802.1189

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/04/063 2008

  26. [26]

    Catani, Y

    S. Catani, Y. L. Dokshitzer and B. R. Webber,Thek ⊥ clustering algorithm for jets in deep inelastic scattering and hadron collisions, Phys. Lett. B285, 291 (1992), doi:10.1016/0370-2693(92)91467-N

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(92)91467-n 1992

  27. [27]

    Catani, Y

    S. Catani, Y. L. Dokshitzer, M. Olsson, G. Turnock and B. R. Webber,New clustering algorithm for multi - jet cross-sections in e+ e- annihilation, Phys. Lett. B269, 432 (1991), doi:10.1016/0370-2693(91)90196-W

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(91)90196-w 1991

  28. [28]

    Brown and W

    N. Brown and W. J. Stirling,Finding jets and summing soft gluons: A New algorithm, Z. Phys. C53, 629 (1992), doi:10.1007/BF01559740

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01559740 1992

  29. [29]

    Wobisch and T

    M. Wobisch and T. Wengler,Hadronization corrections to jet cross-sections in deep inelastic scattering, InWorkshop on Monte Carlo Generators for HERA Physics (Plenary Starting Meeting), pp. 270–279 (1998),hep-ph/9907280

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  30. [30]

    Y. L. Dokshitzer, G. D. Leder, S. Moretti and B. R. Webber,Better jet clustering algo- rithms, JHEP08, 001 (1997), doi:10.1088/1126-6708/1997/08/001,hep-ph/9707323

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/1997/08/001 1997

  31. [31]

    S. D. Ellis and D. E. Soper,Successive combination jet algorithm for hadron collisions, Phys. Rev. D48, 3160 (1993), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.48.3160,hep-ph/9305266

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.48.3160 1993

  32. [32]

    Catani, Y

    S. Catani, Y. L. Dokshitzer, M. H. Seymour and B. R. Webber,Longitudinally invariantK t clustering algorithms for hadron hadron collisions, Nucl. Phys. B406, 187 (1993), doi:10.1016/0550-3213(93)90166-M

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(93)90166-m 1993

  33. [33]

    Bartelet al.,Experimental Studies on Multi-Jet Production ine +e− Annihilation at PETRA Energies, Z

    W. Bartelet al.,Experimental Studies on Multi-Jet Production ine +e− Annihilation at PETRA Energies, Z. Phys. C33, 23 (1986), doi:10.1007/BF01410449

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01410449 1986

  34. [34]

    Bethkeet al.,Experimental Investigation of the Energy Dependence of the Strong Coupling Strength, Phys

    S. Bethkeet al.,Experimental Investigation of the Energy Dependence of the Strong Coupling Strength, Phys. Lett. B213, 235 (1988), doi:10.1016/0370-2693(88)91032-5

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(88)91032-5 1988

  35. [35]

    M. R. Adamset al.,First measurements of Jet Production Rates in Deep Inelastic Lepton Proton Scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett.69, 1026 (1992), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.1026

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.69.1026 1992

  36. [36]

    M. R. Adamset al.,Q 2 dependence of the average squared transverse energy of jets in deep inelastic muon - nucleon scattering with comparison to QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 466 (1994), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.466

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.72.466 1994

  37. [37]

    Ahmedet al.,Determination of the strong coupling constant from jet rates in deep inelastic scattering, Phys

    T. Ahmedet al.,Determination of the strong coupling constant from jet rates in deep inelastic scattering, Phys. Lett. B346, 415 (1995), doi:10.1016/0370-2693(95)00095- 3

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(95)00095- 1995

  38. [38]

    Gauge Theory of the Confor- mal and Superconformal Group,

    M. Derricket al.,Observation of jet production in deep inelastic scattering with a large rapidity gap at HERA, Phys. Lett. B332, 228 (1994), doi:10.1016/0370- 2693(94)90883-4

    work page doi:10.1016/0370- 1994

  39. [39]

    Measurement of $\alpha_S$ from Jet Rates in Deep Inelastic Scattering at HERA

    M. Derricket al.,Measurement ofα s from jet rates in deep inelastic scattering at HERA, Phys. Lett. B363, 201 (1995), doi:10.1016/0370-2693(95)01284-W, hep-ex/9510001. 20 SciPost Physics Submission

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/0370-2693(95)01284-w 1995

  40. [40]

    Transverse Energy and Forward Jet Production in the Low $x$ Regime at HERA

    S. Aidet al.,Transverse energy and forward jet production in the low x regime at HERA, Phys. Lett. B356, 118 (1995), doi:10.1016/0370-2693(95)00804-T, hep-ex/9506012

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/0370-2693(95)00804-t 1995

  41. [41]

    Diffractive dijet production at HERA

    C. Adloffet al.,Diffractive dijet production at HERA, Eur. Phys. J. C6, 421 (1999), doi:10.1007/s100529801046,hep-ex/9808013

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s100529801046 1999

  42. [42]

    Measurement of Internal Jet Structure in Dijet Production in Deep-Inelastic Scattering at HERA

    C. Adloffet al.,Measurement of internal jet structure in dijet production in deep inelastic scattering at HERA, Nucl. Phys. B545, 3 (1999), doi:10.1016/S0550- 3213(99)00118-2,hep-ex/9901010

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0550- 1999

  43. [43]

    Forward Jet and Particle Production at HERA

    C. Adloffet al.,Forward jet and particle production at HERA, Nucl. Phys. B538, 3 (1999), doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(98)00745-7,hep-ex/9809028

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0550-3213(98)00745-7 1999

  44. [44]

    Measurement and QCD Analysis of Jet Cross Sections in Deep-Inelastic Positron-Proton Collisions at sqrt(s) of 300 GeV

    C. Adloffet al.,Measurement and QCD analysis of jet cross-sections in deep inelastic positron - proton collisions at √sof 300 GeV, Eur. Phys. J. C19, 289 (2001), doi:10.1007/s100520100621,hep-ex/0010054

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s100520100621 2001

  45. [45]

    Measurement of Inclusive Jet Cross-Sections in Deep-Inelastic ep Scattering at HERA

    C. Adloffet al.,Measurement of inclusive jet cross-sections in deep inelastic ep scat- tering at HERA, Phys. Lett. B542, 193 (2002), doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(02)02375-4, hep-ex/0206029

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(02)02375-4 2002

  46. [46]

    Inclusive jet cross sections in the Breit frame in neutral current deep inelastic scattering at HERA and determination of alpha_s

    S. Chekanovet al.,Inclusive jet cross-sections in the Breit frame in neutral current deep inelastic scattering at HERA and determination ofα s, Phys. Lett. B547, 164 (2002), doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(02)02763-6,hep-ex/0208037

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(02)02763-6 2002

  47. [47]

    An NLO QCD analysis of inclusive cross-section and jet-production data from the ZEUS experiment

    S. Chekanovet al.,An NLO QCD analysis of inclusive cross-section and jet- production data from the zeus experiment, Eur. Phys. J. C42, 1 (2005), doi:10.1140/epjc/s2005-02293-x,hep-ph/0503274

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s2005-02293-x 2005

  48. [48]

    Inclusive-jet and dijet cross sections in deep inelastic scattering at HERA

    S. Chekanovet al.,Inclusive-jet and dijet cross-sections in deep inelastic scatter- ing at HERA, Nucl. Phys. B765, 1 (2007), doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2006.09.018, hep-ex/0608048

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2006.09.018 2007

  49. [49]

    Measurement of Inclusive Jet Production in Deep-Inelastic Scattering at High Q^2 and Determination of the Strong Coupling

    A. Aktaset al.,Measurement of inclusive jet production in deep-inelastic scattering at highQ 2 and determination of the strong coupling, Phys. Lett. B653, 134 (2007), doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2007.07.050,0706.3722

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2007.07.050 2007

  50. [50]

    F. D. Aaronet al.,Jet Production in ep Collisions at HighQ 2 and Determination of αs, Eur. Phys. J. C65, 363 (2010), doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-009-1208-7,0904.3870

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-009-1208-7 2010

  51. [51]

    F. D. Aaronet al.,Jet Production in ep Collisions at LowQ 2 and Determination of αs, Eur. Phys. J. C67, 1 (2010), doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-010-1282-x,0911.5678

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-010-1282-x 2010

  52. [52]

    Measurement of Multijet Production in ep Collisions at High Q^2 and Determination of the Strong Coupling alpha_s

    V. Andreevet al.,Measurement of multijet production inepcollisions at highQ 2 and determination of the strong couplingα s, Eur. Phys. J. C75(2), 65 (2015), doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-3223-6,1406.4709

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-3223-6 2015

  53. [53]

    F. A. Dreyer, G. P. Salam and G. Soyez,The Lund Jet Plane, JHEP12, 064 (2018), doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2018)064,1807.04758

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep12(2018)064 2018

  54. [54]

    FastJet user manual

    M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam and G. Soyez,FastJet User Manual, Eur. Phys. J. C72, 1896 (2012), doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-1896-2,1111.6097

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-1896-2 2012

  55. [55]

    B. R. Webber,Factorization and jet clustering algorithms for deep inelastic scattering, J. Phys. G19, 1567 (1993), doi:10.1088/0954-3899/19/10/012. 21 SciPost Physics Submission

    work page doi:10.1088/0954-3899/19/10/012 1993

  56. [56]

    Breit,The Effect of Retardation on the Interaction of Two Electrons, Phys

    G. Breit,The Effect of Retardation on the Interaction of Two Electrons, Phys. Rev. 34, 553 (1929), doi:10.1103/PhysRev.34.553

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.34.553 1929

  57. [57]

    F. J. Ernst, R. G. Sachs and K. C. Wali,Electromagnetic form factors of the nucleon, Phys. Rev.119, 1105 (1960), doi:10.1103/PhysRev.119.1105

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.119.1105 1960

  58. [58]

    R. G. Sachs,High-Energy Behavior of Nucleon Electromagnetic Form Factors, Phys. Rev.126, 2256 (1962), doi:10.1103/PhysRev.126.2256

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.126.2256 1962

  59. [59]

    Austin , title =

    R. Devenish and A. Cooper-Sarkar,Deep inelastic scattering, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198506713.001.0001 (2004)

    work page doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198506713.001.0001 2004

  60. [60]

    A comprehensive guide to the physics and usage of PYTHIA 8.3

    C. Bierlichet al.,A comprehensive guide to the physics and usage of PYTHIA 8.3, Sci- Post Phys. Codeb.2022, 8 (2022), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhysCodeb.8,2203.11601

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.21468/scipostphyscodeb.8 2022

  61. [61]

    Some Dipole Shower Studies

    B. Cabouat and T. Sj¨ ostrand,Some Dipole Shower Studies, Eur. Phys. J. C78(3), 226 (2018), doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-5645-z,1710.00391

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-5645-z 2018

  62. [62]

    Bierlichet al.,Robust Independent Validation of Experiment and Theory: Rivet version 3, SciPost Phys.8, 026 (2020), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.8.2.026, 1912.05451

    C. Bierlichet al.,Robust Independent Validation of Experiment and Theory: Rivet version 3, SciPost Phys.8, 026 (2020), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.8.2.026, 1912.05451

    work page doi:10.21468/scipostphys.8.2.026 2020

  63. [63]

    Tuning PYTHIA 8.1: the Monash 2013 Tune

    P. Skands, S. Carrazza and J. Rojo,Tuning PYTHIA 8.1: the Monash 2013 Tune, Eur. Phys. J. C74(8), 3024 (2014), doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-3024-y,1404.5630

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-3024-y 2013

  64. [64]

    The Catchment Area of Jets

    M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam and G. Soyez,The Catchment Area of Jets, JHEP04, 005 (2008), doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/04/005,0802.1188

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/04/005 2008

  65. [65]

    P. J. Mulders and R. D. Tangerman,The Complete tree level result up to order 1/Q for polarized deep inelastic leptoproduction, Nucl. Phys. B461, 197 (1996), doi:10.1016/0550-3213(95)00632-X, [Erratum: Nucl.Phys.B 484, 538–540 (1997)], hep-ph/9510301. 22

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/0550-3213(95)00632-x 1996