pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2203.11601 · v1 · submitted 2022-03-22 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex

Recognition: 2 theorem links

A comprehensive guide to the physics and usage of PYTHIA 8.3

Christian Bierlich , Smita Chakraborty , Nishita Desai , Leif Gellersen , Ilkka Helenius , Philip Ilten , Leif L\"onnblad , Stephen Mrenna
show 6 more authors
Stefan Prestel Christian T. Preuss Torbj\"orn Sj\"ostrand Peter Skands Marius Utheim Rob Verheyen
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-12 01:38 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-ex
keywords PYTHIA 8.3event generatorMonte Carlo simulationhigh-energy collisionsStandard Modelstrong interactionsheavy ion physicsparton shower
0
0 comments X

The pith

The PYTHIA 8.3 manual supplies enough detail on its physics models and central algorithms for users to understand assumptions, evaluate outputs, and reproduce main results on their own.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper serves as the user manual for the PYTHIA 8.3 event generator, a program that creates sets of particles produced in high-energy collisions. It covers reactions inside and outside the Standard Model, with emphasis on strong-interaction effects and extension to heavy-ion collisions. The text explains the assumptions and approximations inside each physics model so that users can judge the reliability of generated events. A subset of core algorithms receives step-by-step descriptions sufficient for independent reproduction of the program's primary outputs. The manual also supplies worked examples of typical usage and instructions for connecting the generator to external tools.

Core claim

The manual for PYTHIA 8.3 presents both pedagogical overviews and practical instructions. Every included physics model is described at a level that reveals its main assumptions and approximations. Selected central algorithms are given in sufficient detail that their dominant results can be reproduced without inspecting the source code. This combination lets users assess the trustworthiness of the program's output and supports the addition or modification of models.

What carries the argument

The PYTHIA 8.3 event generator, which assembles complete particle final states from high-energy incoming particles by applying successive stages of hard scattering, parton evolution, hadronization, and decay.

If this is right

  • Users obtain a clear overview of the assumptions inside each model and can therefore judge when the output is reliable.
  • The main numerical results of the most important algorithms can be reproduced from the text alone.
  • Readers are positioned to modify existing models or introduce new ones without starting from scratch.
  • Standard analysis tasks are illustrated by concrete code examples that can be copied and adapted.
  • Connections to external programs are specified so that PYTHIA 8.3 can be embedded in larger simulation chains.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Independent reproduction of algorithms may allow external groups to verify the generator's behavior in kinematic regions not explicitly tested in the manual.
  • The level of documentation could lower the barrier for new users to compare simulation predictions directly against experimental data.
  • The same manual format might be adopted by authors of other Monte Carlo generators to improve transparency across the field.
  • Extended use in heavy-ion studies could help isolate effects of the strong force in dense nuclear matter.

Load-bearing premise

The written descriptions of the models and algorithms match the actual current implementation inside the PYTHIA 8.3 code.

What would settle it

A side-by-side comparison, for one of the central algorithms such as parton showering, between the step-by-step procedure written in the manual and the numerical distributions actually produced by running the program, revealing a clear mismatch.

read the original abstract

This manual describes the PYTHIA 8.3 event generator, the most recent version of an evolving physics tool used to answer fundamental questions in particle physics. The program is most often used to generate high-energy-physics collision "events", i.e. sets of particles produced in association with the collision of two incoming high-energy particles, but has several uses beyond that. The guiding philosophy is to produce and reproduce properties of experimentally obtained collisions as accurately as possible. The program includes a wide ranges of reactions within and beyond the Standard Model, and extending to heavy ion physics. Emphasis is put on phenomena where strong interactions play a major role. The manual contains both pedagogical and practical components. All included physics models are described in enough detail to allow the user to obtain a cursory overview of used assumptions and approximations, enabling an informed evaluation of the program output. A number of the most central algorithms are described in enough detail that the main results of the program can be reproduced independently, allowing further development of existing models or the addition of new ones. Finally, a chapter dedicated fully to the user is included towards the end, providing pedagogical examples of standard use cases, and a detailed description of a number of external interfaces. The program code, the online manual, and the latest version of this print manual can be found on the PYTHIA web page: https://www.pythia.org/

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a comprehensive user manual for the PYTHIA 8.3 event generator. It describes the program's physics models and algorithms for simulating high-energy particle collisions (including Standard Model processes, beyond-Standard-Model extensions, and heavy-ion physics), with emphasis on strong-interaction phenomena. The central claim is that the included descriptions provide sufficient detail for a cursory overview of assumptions and approximations, enabling informed evaluation of output, while a subset of central algorithms are specified at a level permitting independent reproduction of main results; the manual also supplies pedagogical usage examples and external-interface documentation.

Significance. If the descriptions accurately match the implementation, the manual is a significant resource for the high-energy physics community. It supports reproducible use of a widely adopted simulation tool, facilitates extension of existing models, and includes practical examples that lower the barrier for new users. The combination of pedagogical overviews and detailed algorithmic sections strengthens its value beyond prior versions.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract, line 3: 'a wide ranges of reactions' contains a grammatical error and should read 'a wide range of reactions'.
  2. [Introduction (inferred from structure)] The manual references external resources and prior versions extensively; a brief consolidated table of key changes from PYTHIA 8.2 would improve navigation for returning users.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript and for recommending acceptance. The recognition of the manual's value as a resource for the high-energy physics community is appreciated.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in this descriptive user manual

full rationale

This is a user manual for the established PYTHIA 8.3 event generator rather than a research paper presenting novel derivations or quantitative predictions. The central claims concern the pedagogical and practical value of the manual's own descriptions of physics models and central algorithms, which are asserted to enable cursory overviews and independent reproduction of main results. These statements are self-referential by nature but do not reduce any 'prediction' or 'first-principles result' to inputs by construction, nor do they involve fitted parameters, self-citation load-bearing arguments, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes smuggled via citation. The document references external code, online resources, and prior versions without internal logical reductions. It is self-contained against external benchmarks (the actual PYTHIA source and web resources), so no circularity patterns apply.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

As this is a software manual rather than a theoretical paper, the central content does not introduce or rely on new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; it documents models from prior literature and the code base.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5612 in / 1127 out tokens · 29810 ms · 2026-05-12T01:38:43.358787+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 36 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Dissecting Jet-Tagger Through Mechanistic Interpretability

    hep-ph 2026-05 accept novelty 8.0

    A Particle Transformer jet tagger contains a sparse six-head circuit whose source-relay-readout structure recovers most performance and whose residual stream preferentially encodes 2-prong energy correlators.

  2. Logarithmically-accurate showers with massive quarks

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    PanScales final-state showers now include quark masses at NLL accuracy while keeping original accuracy for massless observables.

  3. Collider-Bench: Benchmarking AI Agents with Particle Physics Analysis Reproduction

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Collider-Bench is a new benchmark showing that current LLM agents cannot reliably reproduce LHC analyses at the level of a physicist-in-the-loop.

  4. Decaying spin-3/2 dark matter from baryon number violation

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Non-supersymmetric spin-3/2 dark matter with baryon-violating portals can explain the relic abundance through UV and Boltzmann-suppressed freeze-in, with viable parameter space constrained by indirect detection, direc...

  5. Measurement of jet photoproduction in ultra-peripheral Pb+Pb collisions without nuclear breakup at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}} = 5.02$ TeV with the ATLAS detector

    nucl-ex 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    First measurement of γ+IP→jets cross-sections in 0n0n ultra-peripheral Pb+Pb collisions at 5.02 TeV, achieved by statistically separating photon-pomeron, photon-photon, and peripheral photonuclear contributions via te...

  6. A First Account of the Impact of Ion Electromagnetic Dissociation on Event Exclusivity in Ultraperipheral LHC Collisions

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Hadrons from ion electromagnetic dissociation break exclusivity conditions in ultraperipheral collisions, resolving tensions in exclusive muon-pair and coherent J/ψ measurements at the LHC.

  7. Multiplicity dependence of prompt and non-prompt J/$\psi$ production at midrapidity in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 13$ TeV

    hep-ex 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Self-normalized yields of prompt and non-prompt J/ψ increase stronger than linearly with charged-particle multiplicity in pp collisions at 13 TeV, with stronger effect in the toward azimuthal region.

  8. Measurement of charged-particle production in $\sqrt{s_\text{NN}}=9.62$ TeV proton-oxygen collisions as a probe of cosmic-ray air showers with the ATLAS detector

    hep-ex 2026-04 accept novelty 7.0

    ATLAS measured charged-particle production in 9.62 TeV p-O collisions, yielding a fiducial pO cross section of 396 mb and extrapolated p-air inelastic cross section of 406 mb, with distributions an order of magnitude ...

  9. NLO QCD and parton-shower effects for Higgs-boson production in association with a hard photon via vector-boson fusion

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    NLO QCD plus parton-shower matched implementation for VBF Higgs plus photon production, with studies showing small shower effects on Higgs observables and larger effects on sub-leading jets.

  10. MeVPrtl: An Event Generator for Dark Sector Particles in the Short-Baseline Neutrino Program

    hep-ex 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    MeVPrtl is a new event generator that implements Higgs portal, heavy neutral lepton, and heavy QCD axion models for use in short-baseline neutrino experiments.

  11. Observation of impact parameter dependent modifications of nuclear parton distributions in photonuclear Pb+Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}} = 5.02$ TeV with the ATLAS detector

    nucl-ex 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    ATLAS reports a 6 sigma observation that nuclear parton distribution modifications in photonuclear Pb+Pb collisions depend on impact parameter, shown by differing cross-section shapes versus x+ with and without forwar...

  12. Low-Multiplicity Jets as Probes of GeV-Scale Light-Quark-Coupled Particles

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A proposed LHC search using low-multiplicity jets plus a photon can extend sensitivity to GeV-scale particles that couple to light quarks.

  13. A new approach to long-lived particle detection at hadron colliders: the $\textsf{DELIGHT-SHIELD}$ concept

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    DELIGHT-SHIELD uses a dedicated shield followed by tracking to suppress hadronic and electromagnetic backgrounds by up to seven orders of magnitude, reaching branching ratio sensitivity of O(10^{-9}) for h to phi phi ...

  14. Operator structure of power corrections and anomalous scaling in energy correlators

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Linear power corrections in energy correlators have a universal anomalous scaling because the dijet operator must be combined with a triple-jet component at one-loop order.

  15. Dijet invariant mass of charged-particle jets in pp and p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV

    nucl-ex 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    The first measurement of charged-particle dijet invariant mass spectra shows no significant nuclear modification in p-Pb collisions at low masses.

  16. Diffusion-Based Point-Cloud Generation of Heavy-Ion Events

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A two-stage score-driven diffusion model with Point-Edge Transformer generates realistic high-multiplicity heavy-ion events as point clouds.

  17. Monte Carlo Event Generation with Continuous Normalizing Flows

    hep-ph 2026-04 conditional novelty 6.0

    Continuous normalizing flows improve unweighting efficiency in Monte Carlo event generation for high-jet-multiplicity collider processes by factors up to 184, with wall-time gains of about ten when combined with coupl...

  18. Search for pair production of additional neutral scalars within the Inert Doublet Model in a final state with two electrons or two muons in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV and 13.6 TeV

    hep-ex 2026-05 accept novelty 5.0

    No significant excess found; new exclusion limits reach m_H = 108 GeV for m_H - m_A = 78 GeV in the Inert Doublet Model.

  19. Medium Characterization with Hard Probes: From Cherenkov Light in QED to Jet Drift in QCD

    nucl-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    The work presents a dispersive fit for the refractive index of liquid argon incorporating anomalous dispersion and proposes jet drift in simulations of heavy-ion collisions as a way to disentangle medium properties fr...

  20. Probing anomalous quartic gauge couplings via vector boson scattering at the same-sign muon collider

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Projections show the μTRISTAN same-sign muon collider can significantly improve bounds on anomalous quartic gauge couplings via vector boson scattering in multiple final states at 2 and 6 TeV.

  21. Studying the Infrared Behaviour of Improved Logarithmic Accuracy Parton Showers with Herwig

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Implementing improved logarithmic accuracy parton showers in Herwig reveals that differences in infrared cutoffs have important effects on hadron-level predictions and tunability.

  22. New insights into the $b\rightarrow c \bar{u}q$ puzzle through Top-Bottom synergies

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Anomalies in b to c u-bar q transitions remain puzzling as proposed new physics scenarios involving SU(2) doublets are not significantly relaxed by collider dilution or factorization breakdown.

  23. Explainable AI for Jet Tagging: A Comparative Study of GNNExplainer, GNNShap, and GradCAM for Jet Tagging in the Lund Jet Plane

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Explainability techniques applied to LundNet show that assigned node importance correlates with classical jet substructure observables such as N-subjettiness ratios and energy correlation functions, with shifts across...

  24. The KM3NeT event: a primordial high energy neutrino?

    astro-ph.HE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    The KM3NeT neutrino event may be a primordial neutrino from relic particle decay or annihilation near recombination, yielding a narrow spectral peak that evades broad power-law constraints from other telescopes.

  25. Bayesian inference constraints on jet quenching across centrality, beam energy, and observable classes in LHC heavy-ion collisions

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Bayesian posteriors from JETSCAPE jet-quenching model are largely compatible across centrality but exhibit shifts across beam energy and observable class, with varying ability to predict complementary datasets.

  26. LHC signatures of a light pseudoscalar in a flipped two-Higgs scenario: the usefulness of boosted $b{\bar b}$ pairs

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Boosted di-b-jet tagging plus BDT analysis yields 5-10 sigma significance for a light pseudoscalar in flipped 2HDM with 3 ab^{-1} including 10% systematics.

  27. Search for charginos and neutralinos with $B-L$ $R$-parity violating decays in $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV and $13.6$ TeV $pp$ collisions with the ATLAS detector

    hep-ex 2026-05 accept novelty 4.0

    No evidence for charginos and neutralinos in R-parity violating Higgs-decay channels; masses 150-1100 GeV excluded at 95% CL assuming equal lepton branching fractions.

  28. Revisiting predictions for cosmic-ray antinucleon fluxes from Galactic Dark Matter

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Updated predictions for cosmic antinuclei fluxes from dark matter yield tighter upper limits on light DM annihilation cross sections from AMS-02 antiproton data and show that GAPS could improve those limits by up to a...

  29. Study of Particle Fluence Effects on Collected Charge and Depletion Voltage of the ATLAS IBL Planar Pixel Sensors

    physics.ins-det 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Bias voltage scans show the collected charge decreasing and depletion voltage increasing in ATLAS IBL planar pixel sensors as a function of accumulated fluence above 2e15 1 MeV-neutron equivalent per cm2, compared aga...

  30. Medium Characterization with Hard Probes: From Cherenkov Light in QED to Jet Drift in QCD

    nucl-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Presents a dispersive fit for liquid argon refractive index sensitive to Cherenkov angles and uses jet drift in APE simulations to disentangle QGP tomography from energy loss.

  31. Search for quantum black holes in lepton+jet final states using proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13.6$ TeV with the ATLAS detector

    hep-ex 2026-04 accept novelty 4.0

    No significant excess of high-mass lepton+jet events is observed in 164 fb^{-1} of 13.6 TeV pp collisions, setting 95% CL upper limits on quantum black hole production cross-section times branching ratio that reach a ...

  32. Probing inelastic sub-GeV dark matter at the DUNE near detector

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    DUNE's ND-LAr can probe sub-GeV inelastic dark matter parameter space consistent with relic abundance via dark Higgs-mediated annihilation, especially at large dark photon-to-DM mass ratios.

  33. Centrality Dependence of the Balance Functions for Identified Particles in Pb--Pb Collisions Using Pythia + Angantyr

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    PYTHIA+Angantyr reproduces peripheral Pb-Pb balance functions for identified particles but fails to capture the narrowing of pion balance functions in central collisions.

  34. Doubly charged Higgs production within the Higgs triplet model at future electron-positron colliders

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    CLIC offers superior discovery potential for doubly charged Higgs bosons in the Higgs triplet model compared to HL-LHC, reaching masses up to 1.2 TeV in gauge-like scenarios and high significance in Yukawa-like region...

  35. Signals of Doomsday III: Cosmological signatures of the late time $U(1)_{EM}$ symmetry breaking

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    A model of late-time U(1)EM symmetry breaking via scalar-driven first-order phase transition predicts high-energy photon and neutrino bursts as long-range precursors detectable by multi-messenger facilities.

  36. Track and Vertex Reconstruction with the ATLAS Inner Detector

    physics.ins-det 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    ATLAS Inner Detector track and vertex reconstruction maintains high efficiency, good resolution, and low fake rates for up to 80 simultaneous proton-proton interactions in Run 2 and Run 3 data and simulations.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

298 extracted references · 298 canonical work pages · cited by 35 Pith papers · 5 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    An Introduction to PYTHIA 8.2

    T . Sjöstrand, S. Ask, J. R. Christiansen, R. Corke, N. Desai, P . Ilten, S. Mrenna, S. Prestel, C. O. Rasmussen and P . Z. Skands,An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2, Comput. Phys. Commun. 191, 159 (2015), doi:10.1016 /j.cpc.2015.01.024, 1410.3012

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  2. [2]

    Sjöstrand,The PYTHIA Event Generator: Past, Present and Future , Comput

    T . Sjöstrand,The PYTHIA Event Generator: Past, Present and Future , Comput. Phys. Com- mun. 246, 106910 (2020), doi:10.1016 /j.cpc.2019.106910, 1907.09874

    work page arXiv 2020

  3. [3]

    Bartelet al., Experimental Study of Jets in electron - Positron Annihilation, Phys

    W . Bartelet al., Experimental Study of Jets in electron - Positron Annihilation, Phys. Lett. B 101, 129 (1981), doi:10.1016 /0370-2693(81)90505-0

    work page 1981

  4. [4]

    Lönnblad, ARIADNE version 4: A Program for simulation of QCD cascades implement- ing the color dipole model , Comput

    L. Lönnblad, ARIADNE version 4: A Program for simulation of QCD cascades implement- ing the color dipole model , Comput. Phys. Commun. 71, 15 (1992), doi:10.1016 /0010- 4655(92)90068-A

    work page 1992

  5. [5]

    Ingelman, A

    G. Ingelman, A. Edin and J. Rathsman,LEPTO 6.5: A Monte Carlo generator for deep inelastic lepton-nucleon scattering, Comput. Phys. Commun. 101, 108 (1997), doi:10.1016/S0010- 4655(96)00157-9, hep-ph/9605286

    work page doi:10.1016/s0010- 1997

  6. [6]

    Kharraziha and L

    H. Kharraziha and L. Lönnblad,The Linked dipole chain Monte Carlo, JHEP 03, 006 (1998), doi:10.1088/1126-6708/1998/03/006, hep-ph/9709424

    work page doi:10.1088/1126-6708/1998/03/006 1998

  7. [7]

    Nilsson-Almqvist and E

    B. Nilsson-Almqvist and E. Stenlund, Interactions Between Hadrons and Nuclei: The Lund Monte Carlo, Fritiof Version 1.6 , Comput. Phys. Commun. 43, 387 (1987), doi:10.1016/0010-4655(87)90056-7

    work page doi:10.1016/0010-4655(87)90056-7 1987

  8. [8]

    James and L

    F . James and L. Moneta, Review of High-Quality Random Number Generators , Comput. Softw. Big Sci. 4(1), 2 (2020), doi:10.1007 /s41781-019-0034-3, 1903.01247

    work page arXiv 2020

  9. [9]

    Marsaglia, B

    G. Marsaglia, B. Narasimhan and A. Zaman, A random number generator for PC’s, Comput. Phys. Commun. 60, 345 (1990), doi:10.1016 /0010-4655(90)90033-W

    work page 1990

  10. [10]

    Luscher, A Portable high quality random number generator for lattice field theory simu- lations, Comput

    M. Luscher, A Portable high quality random number generator for lattice field theory simu- lations, Comput. Phys. Commun. 79, 100 (1994), doi:10.1016 /0010-4655(94)90232-1, hep-lat/9309020

    work page arXiv 1994

  11. [11]

    K. G. Savvidy ,The MIXMAX random number generator, Comput. Phys. Commun. 196, 161 (2015), doi:10.1016 /j.cpc.2015.06.003, 1403.5355

    work page arXiv 2015

  12. [12]

    Kleiss and R

    R. Kleiss and R. Pittau, Weight optimization in multichannel Monte Carlo , Comput. Phys. Commun. 83, 141 (1994), doi:10.1016 /0010-4655(94)90043-4, hep-ph/9405257

    work page arXiv 1994

  13. [13]

    Sjöstrand and M

    T . Sjöstrand and M. van Zijl,A Multiple Interaction Model for the Event Structure in Hadron Collisions, Phys. Rev. D 36, 2019 (1987), doi:10.1103 /PhysRevD.36.2019

    work page 2019

  14. [14]

    PYTHIA 6.4 Physics and Manual

    T . Sjöstrand, S. Mrenna and P . Z. Skands,PYTHIA 6.4 Physics and Manual, JHEP 05, 026 (2006), doi:10.1088 /1126-6708/2006/05/026, hep-ph/0603175

    work page Pith review arXiv 2006

  15. [15]

    Lönnblad, Fooling Around with the Sudakov Veto Algorithm, Eur

    L. Lönnblad, Fooling Around with the Sudakov Veto Algorithm, Eur. Phys. J. C 73(3), 2350 (2013), doi:10.1140 /epjc/s10052-013-2350-9, 1211.7204. 276 SciPost Physics Codebases Submission

    work page arXiv 2013

  16. [16]

    Plätzer and M

    S. Plätzer and M. Sjödahl, The Sudakov Veto Algorithm Reloaded, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 127, 26 (2012), doi:10.1140 /epjp/i2012-12026-x, 1108.6180

    work page arXiv 2012

  17. [17]

    Kleiss and R

    R. Kleiss and R. Verheyen, Competing Sudakov Veto Algorithms, Eur. Phys. J. C 76(7), 359 (2016), doi:10.1140 /epjc/s10052-016-4231-5, 1605.09246

    work page arXiv 2016

  18. [18]

    P . A. W . Lewis and G. S. Shedler,Simulation of nonhomogeneous poisson processes by thinning, Naval Research Logistics Quarterly 26(3), 403 (1979), doi:10.1002 /nav.3800260304

    work page 1979

  19. [19]

    Devroye, Non-Uniform Random Variate Generation, SpringerLink : Bücher

    L. Devroye, Non-Uniform Random Variate Generation, SpringerLink : Bücher. Springer New York, ISBN 9781461386438 (2013)

    work page 2013

  20. [20]

    Mrenna and P

    S. Mrenna and P . Skands, Automated Parton-Shower Variations in Pythia 8 , Phys. Rev. D 94(7), 074005 (2016), doi:10.1103 /PhysRevD.94.074005, 1605.08352

    work page arXiv 2016

  21. [21]

    James,Monte-Carlo phase space (1968)

    F . James,Monte-Carlo phase space (1968)

    work page 1968

  22. [22]

    Kleiss, W

    R. Kleiss, W . J. Stirling and S. D. Ellis,A New Monte Carlo Treatment of Multiparticle Phase Space at High-energies , Comput. Phys. Commun. 40, 359 (1986), doi:10.1016 /0010- 4655(86)90119-0

    work page 1986

  23. [23]

    Brooks, P

    H. Brooks, P . Skands and R. Verheyen,Interleaved Resonance Decays and Electroweak Radi- ation in Vincia (2021), 2108.10786

    work page arXiv 2021

  24. [24]

    Norrbin and T

    E. Norrbin and T . Sjöstrand,Production and hadronization of heavy quarks, Eur. Phys. J. C 17, 137 (2000), doi:10.1007 /s100520000460, hep-ph/0005110

    work page arXiv 2000

  25. [25]

    J. F . Gunion and Z. Kunszt,Lepton Correlations in Gauge Boson Pair Production and Decay, Phys. Rev. D33, 665 (1986), doi:10.1103 /PhysRevD.33.665

    work page 1986

  26. [26]

    G. T . Bodwin, E. Braaten and G. P . Lepage, Rigorous QCD analysis of inclusive an- nihilation and production of heavy quarkonium , Phys. Rev. D 51, 1125 (1995), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.55.5853, [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 55, 5853 (1997) ], hep-ph/ 9407339

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.55.5853 1995

  27. [27]

    Baier and R

    R. Baier and R. Rückl, Hadronic Collisions: A Quarkonium Factory , Z. Phys. C 19, 251 (1983), doi:10.1007 /BF01572254

    work page 1983

  28. [28]

    Gastmans, W

    R. Gastmans, W . Troost and T . T . Wu,Cross-Sections for Gluon+ Gluon→ Heavy Quarkonium + Gluon, Phys. Lett. B 184, 257 (1987), doi:10.1016 /0370-2693(87)90578-8

    work page 1987

  29. [29]

    P . L. Cho and A. K. Leibovich,Color octet quarkonia production. 2., Phys. Rev. D 53, 6203 (1996), doi:10.1103 /PhysRevD.53.6203, hep-ph/9511315

    work page arXiv 1996

  30. [30]

    Yuan, C.-F

    F . Yuan, C.-F . Qiao and K.-T . Chao,D wave heavy quarkonium production in fixed target experiments, Phys. Rev. D59, 014009 (1999), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.59.014009, hep-ph/ 9807329

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.59.014009 1999

  31. [31]

    Humpert and P

    B. Humpert and P . Mery ,ψψ PRODUCTION AT COLLIDER ENERGIES , Z. Phys. C 20, 83 (1983), doi:10.1007 /BF01577721

    work page 1983

  32. [32]

    Qiao, J /ψ pair production at the Tevatron , Phys

    C.-F . Qiao, J /ψ pair production at the Tevatron , Phys. Rev. D 66, 057504 (2002), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.66.057504, hep-ph/0206093. 277 SciPost Physics Codebases Submission

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.66.057504 2002

  33. [33]

    Nasonet al., Bottom production, In Workshop on Standard Model Physics (and more) at the LHC (First Plenary Meeting), pp

    P . Nasonet al., Bottom production, In Workshop on Standard Model Physics (and more) at the LHC (First Plenary Meeting), pp. 231–304 (1999),hep-ph/0003142

    work page arXiv 1999

  34. [34]

    Bargiotti and V

    M. Bargiotti and V . Vagnoni, Heavy quarkonia sector in PYTHIA 6.324: Tuning, validation and perspectives at LHC(b) (2007)

    work page 2007

  35. [36]

    Aaij et al., Study of J /ψ Production in Jets, Phys

    R. Aaij et al., Study of J /ψ Production in Jets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118(19), 192001 (2017), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.192001, 1701.05116

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.118.192001 2017

  36. [37]

    A. M. Sirunyan et al., Study of J/ψ meson production inside jets in pp collisions at ps = 8 TeV, Phys. Lett. B804, 135409 (2020), doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135409, 1910.01686

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135409 2020

  37. [38]

    Carloni and T

    L. Carloni and T . Sjöstrand,Visible Effects of Invisible Hidden Valley Radiation, JHEP 09, 105 (2010), doi:10.1007 /JHEP09(2010)105, 1006.2911

    work page arXiv 2010

  38. [39]

    Carloni, J

    L. Carloni, J. Rathsman and T . Sjöstrand,Discerning Secluded Sector gauge structures, JHEP 04, 091 (2011), doi:10.1007 /JHEP04(2011)091, 1102.3795

    work page arXiv 2011

  39. [40]

    Dittmaier et al., Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 1

    S. Dittmaier et al., Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 1. Inclusive Observables (2011), doi:10.5170/CERN-2011-002, 1101.0593

    work page doi:10.5170/cern-2011-002 2011

  40. [41]

    S. C. Park, H. S. Song and J.-H. Song, Z boson pair production at CERN LHC in a stabilized Randall-Sundrum scenario , Phys. Rev. D 65, 075008 (2002), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.65.075008, hep-ph/0103308

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.65.075008 2002

  41. [42]

    Kovaˇrík, P

    K. Kovaˇrík, P . M. Nadolsky and D. E. Soper,Hadronic structure in high-energy collisions, Rev. Mod. Phys. 92(4), 045003 (2020), doi:10.1103 /RevModPhys.92.045003, 1905.06957

    work page arXiv 2020

  42. [43]

    V . N. Gribov and L. N. Lipatov, Deep inelastic ep scattering in perturbation theory , Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 15, 438 (1972)

    work page 1972

  43. [44]

    Y. L. Dokshitzer,Calculation of the Structure Functions for Deep Inelastic Scattering ande+e− Annihilation by Perturbation Theory in Quantum Chromodynamics., Sov. Phys. JETP46, 641 (1977)

    work page 1977

  44. [45]

    Altarelli and G

    G. Altarelli and G. Parisi, Asymptotic Freedom in Parton Language, Nucl. Phys. B 126, 298 (1977), doi:10.1016 /0550-3213(77)90384-4

    work page 1977

  45. [46]

    Pionic Parton Distributions Revisited

    M. Glück, E. Reya and I. Schienbein, Pionic parton distributions revisited , Eur. Phys. J. C 10, 313 (1999), doi:10.1007 /s100529900124, hep-ph/9903288

    work page Pith review arXiv 1999

  46. [47]

    Glück, E

    M. Glück, E. Reya and A. Vogt, Pionic parton distributions , Z. Phys. C 53, 651 (1992), doi:10.1007/BF01559743

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01559743 1992

  47. [48]

    Glück, E

    M. Glück, E. Reya and M. Stratmann, Mesonic parton densities derived from constituent quark model constraints , Eur. Phys. J. C 2, 159 (1998), doi:10.1007 /s100520050130, hep-ph/9711369. 278 SciPost Physics Codebases Submission

    work page arXiv 1998

  48. [49]

    Sjöstrand and M

    T . Sjöstrand and M. Utheim, Hadron Interactions for Arbitrary Energies and Species, with Applications to Cosmic rays, Eur. Phys. J. C 82(1), 21 (2022), doi:10.1140 /epjc/s10052- 021-09953-5, 2108.03481

    work page arXiv 2022

  49. [50]

    Bertone, R

    V . Bertone, R. Gauld and J. Rojo, Neutrino Telescopes as QCD Microscopes, JHEP 01, 217 (2019), doi:10.1007 /JHEP01(2019)217, 1808.02034

    work page arXiv 2019

  50. [51]

    V . V . Sudakov,Vertex parts at very high-energies in quantum electrodynamics, Sov. Phys. JETP 3, 65 (1956)

    work page 1956

  51. [52]

    Sjöstrand, A Model for Initial State Parton Showers , Phys

    T . Sjöstrand, A Model for Initial State Parton Showers , Phys. Lett. B 157, 321 (1985), doi:10.1016/0370-2693(85)90674-4

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(85)90674-4 1985

  52. [53]

    Gustafson, Dual Description of a Confined Color Field, Phys

    G. Gustafson, Dual Description of a Confined Color Field, Phys. Lett. B 175, 453 (1986), doi:10.1016/0370-2693(86)90622-2

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(86)90622-2 1986

  53. [54]

    Gustafson and U

    G. Gustafson and U. Pettersson, Dipole Formulation of QCD Cascades , Nucl. Phys. B 306, 746 (1988), doi:10.1016 /0550-3213(88)90441-5

    work page 1988

  54. [55]

    ’t Hooft, A Planar Diagram Theory for Strong Interactions, Nucl

    G. ’t Hooft, A Planar Diagram Theory for Strong Interactions, Nucl. Phys. B 72, 461 (1974), doi:10.1016/0550-3213(74)90154-0

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(74)90154-0 1974

  55. [56]

    Höche, D

    S. Höche, D. Reichelt and F . Siegert,Momentum conservation and unitarity in parton showers and NLL resummation , JHEP 01, 118 (2018), doi:10.1007 /JHEP01(2018)118, 1711. 03497

    work page 2018

  56. [57]

    Baberuxki, C

    N. Baberuxki, C. T . Preuss, D. Reichelt and S. Schumann, Resummed predictions for jet-resolution scales in multijet production in e +e− annihilation, JHEP 04, 112 (2020), doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2020)112, 1912.09396

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep04(2020)112 2020

  57. [58]

    Dasgupta, F

    M. Dasgupta, F . A. Dreyer, K. Hamilton, P . F . Monni and G. P . Salam,Logarithmic accuracy of parton showers: a fixed-order study, JHEP 09, 033 (2018), doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2018)033, [Erratum: JHEP 03, 083 (2020)], 1805.09327

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep09(2018)033 2018

  58. [59]

    Hamilton, R

    K. Hamilton, R. Medves, G. P . Salam, L. Scyboz and G. Soyez,Colour and logarithmic accu- racy in final-state parton showers(2020), doi:10.1007 /JHEP03(2021)041, 2011.10054

    work page arXiv 2020

  59. [60]

    Nagy and D

    Z. Nagy and D. E. Soper, Summations of large logarithms by parton showers , Phys. Rev. D 104(5), 054049 (2021), doi:10.1103 /PhysRevD.104.054049, 2011.04773

    work page arXiv 2021

  60. [61]

    Nagy and D

    Z. Nagy and D. E. Soper, Summations by parton showers of large logarithms in electron- positron annihilation (2020), 2011.04777

    work page arXiv 2020

  61. [62]

    Dasgupta, F

    M. Dasgupta, F . A. Dreyer, K. Hamilton, P . F . Monni, G. P . Salam and G. Soyez, Parton showers beyond leading logarithmic accuracy , Phys. Rev. Lett. 125(5), 052002 (2020), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.052002, 2002.11114

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.052002 2020

  62. [63]

    J. R. Forshaw, J. Holguin and S. Plätzer,Building a consistent parton shower, JHEP 09, 014 (2020), doi:10.1007 /JHEP09(2020)014, 2003.06400

    work page arXiv 2020

  63. [64]

    W . T . Giele, D. A. Kosower and P . Z. Skands,Higher-Order Corrections to Timelike Jets, Phys. Rev. D84, 054003 (2011), doi:10.1103 /PhysRevD.84.054003, 1102.2126. 279 SciPost Physics Codebases Submission

    work page arXiv 2011

  64. [65]

    Plätzer and M

    S. Plätzer and M. Sjödahl, Subleading Nc improved Parton Showers, JHEP 07, 042 (2012), doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2012)042, 1201.0260

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep07(2012)042 2012

  65. [66]

    Plätzer, M

    S. Plätzer, M. Sjödahl and J. Thorén, Color matrix element corrections for parton showers , JHEP 11, 009 (2018), doi:10.1007 /JHEP11(2018)009, 1808.00332

    work page arXiv 2018

  66. [67]

    Bellm, Colour Rearrangement for Dipole Showers , Eur

    J. Bellm, Colour Rearrangement for Dipole Showers , Eur. Phys. J. C 78(7), 601 (2018), doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6070-z, 1801.06113

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6070-z 2018

  67. [68]

    Holguin, J

    J. Holguin, J. R. Forshaw and S. Plätzer, Improvements on dipole shower colour, Eur. Phys. J. C 81(4), 364 (2021), doi:10.1140 /epjc/s10052-021-09145-1, 2011.15087

    work page arXiv 2021

  68. [69]

    Isaacson and S

    J. Isaacson and S. Prestel, Stochastically sampling color configurations, Phys. Rev. D 99(1), 014021 (2019), doi:10.1103 /PhysRevD.99.014021, 1806.10102

    work page arXiv 2019

  69. [70]

    Höche and D

    S. Höche and D. Reichelt,Numerical resummation at subleading color in the strongly ordered soft gluon limit, Phys. Rev. D104(3), 034006 (2021), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.034006, 2001.11492

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.034006 2021

  70. [71]

    Nagy and D

    Z. Nagy and D. E. Soper, Parton shower evolution with subleading color , JHEP 06, 044 (2012), doi:10.1007 /JHEP06(2012)044, 1202.4496

    work page arXiv 2012

  71. [72]

    Nagy and D

    Z. Nagy and D. E. Soper,Effects of subleading color in a parton shower, JHEP 07, 119 (2015), doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2015)119, 1501.00778

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep07(2015)119 2015

  72. [73]

    J. R. Forshaw, J. Holguin and S. Plätzer,Parton branching at amplitude level, JHEP 08, 145 (2019), doi:10.1007 /JHEP08(2019)145, 1905.08686

    work page arXiv 2019

  73. [74]

    De Angelis, J

    M. De Angelis, J. R. Forshaw and S. Plätzer, Resummation and Simulation of Soft Gluon Effects beyond Leading Color , Phys. Rev. Lett. 126(11), 112001 (2021), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.112001, 2007.09648

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.112001 2021

  74. [75]

    Bengtsson and T

    M. Bengtsson and T . Sjöstrand, Coherent Parton Showers Versus Matrix Elements: Im- plications of PETRA - PEP Data , Phys. Lett. B 185, 435 (1987), doi:10.1016 /0370- 2693(87)91031-8

    work page 1987

  75. [76]

    Bengtsson and T

    M. Bengtsson and T . Sjöstrand, A Comparative Study of Coherent and Noncoherent Parton Shower Evolution, Nucl. Phys. B 289, 810 (1987), doi:10.1016 /0550-3213(87)90407-X

    work page 1987

  76. [77]

    QCD Radiation off Heavy Particles

    E. Norrbin and T . Sjöstrand, QCD radiation off heavy particles , Nucl. Phys. B 603, 297 (2001), doi:10.1016 /S0550-3213(01)00099-2, hep-ph/0010012

    work page Pith review arXiv 2001

  77. [78]

    Sjöstrand and P

    T . Sjöstrand and P . Z. Skands,Transverse-momentum-ordered showers and interleaved mul- tiple interactions , Eur. Phys. J. C 39, 129 (2005), doi:10.1140 /epjc/s2004-02084-y, hep-ph/0408302

    work page arXiv 2005

  78. [79]

    Corke and T

    R. Corke and T . Sjöstrand,Interleaved Parton Showers and Tuning Prospects, JHEP 03, 032 (2011), doi:10.1007 /JHEP03(2011)032, 1011.1759

    work page arXiv 2011

  79. [80]

    Cabouat, T

    B. Cabouat and T . Sjöstrand,Some Dipole Shower Studies, Eur. Phys. J. C78(3), 226 (2018), doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-5645-z, 1710.00391. 280 SciPost Physics Codebases Submission

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-5645-z 2018

  80. [81]

    Miu and T

    G. Miu and T . Sjöstrand, Wproduction in an improved parton shower approach, Phys. Lett. B 449, 313 (1999), doi:10.1016 /S0370-2693(99)00068-4, hep-ph/9812455

    work page arXiv 1999

Showing first 80 references.