pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.13669 · v1 · pith:L6V24SB5new · submitted 2026-06-11 · 💻 cs.AI

Agents-K1: Towards Agent-native Knowledge Orchestration

Zongsheng Cao , Bihao Zhan , Jinxin Shi , Jiong Wang , Fangchen Yu , Zhijie Zhong , Zijie Guo , Tianshuo Peng
show 17 more authors
Zhuo Liu Yi Xie Xiang Zhuang Yue Fan Runmin Ma Shiyang Feng Xiangchao Yan Anran Liu Peng Ye Wenlong Zhang Shufei Zhang Chunfeng Song Fenghua Ling Jie Zhou Liang He Bo Zhang Lei Bai
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 06:30 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.AI
keywords agentsknowledge graphsscientific information extractionmultimodal parsingmulti-hop reasoningscholarly dataagent orchestrationknowledge orchestration
0
0 comments X

The pith

Agents-K1 converts entire scientific papers into structured knowledge graphs that agents can query for extraction and multi-hop reasoning.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces Agents-K1 as a pipeline that turns raw documents into agent-native scientific knowledge graphs. It argues that prior LLM agents overlook full-paper content by relying on abstracts and flat citation links, so the new system uses a multimodal parser to capture entities, claims, evidence, mechanisms, and method connections instead. The pipeline combines this parser with a trained extraction model and a unified agent interface, then applies it to millions of papers to create the Scholar-KG collection. Experiments show gains on information extraction, graph building, and reasoning tasks. A sympathetic reader would care because better-structured knowledge could let agents handle complex scientific workflows without losing key details.

Core claim

Agents-K1 is an end-to-end knowledge orchestration pipeline built on three components under a unifying foundation: a multimodal parser whose five-module schema extracts entities, multimodal evidence, citations, and typed inter-entity relations from full papers; a 4B information-extraction backbone trained with GRPO under rule-based rewards; and a graphanything CLI that unifies web search, multimodal graph retrieval, and cross-document traversal. Processing 2.46 million papers yields the Scholar-KG, with a one-million-paper subset released. The pipeline claims superior results over existing approaches in scientific information extraction, knowledge graph construction, and multi-hop scientific

What carries the argument

The multimodal parser's five-module schema that extracts entities, multimodal evidence, citations, and typed relations across the full paper rather than abstracts alone.

If this is right

  • Agents obtain richer structures for tracing method lineages and evidence chains across documents.
  • Knowledge graph construction scales to millions of papers without manual intervention for each domain.
  • The same pipeline applies directly to general-domain corpora and schema-conformant data synthesis.
  • Cross-document traversal becomes a native operation inside agent workflows rather than an add-on.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Grounding agent responses in extracted claims and evidence from the graphs could reduce unsupported statements in scientific summaries.
  • The released Scholar-KG subset could serve as training data for models that generate or verify research hypotheses.
  • Adding explicit temporal or dependency links between methods in the schema might further strengthen multi-hop inference chains.

Load-bearing premise

The five-module schema is assumed to capture every key entity, claim, evidence, mechanism, and method lineage needed for scientific reasoning.

What would settle it

A controlled comparison on a fixed set of multi-hop scientific reasoning questions where an abstract-only baseline matches or exceeds Agents-K1 accuracy would falsify the superiority claim.

read the original abstract

Current LLM-based research agents have advanced through agent orchestration, yet largely overlook scientific knowledge orchestration. Existing works often reduce papers to abstracts, surface mentions, and flat \texttt{cites} edges, omitting key entities, claims, evidence, mechanisms, and method lineages essential for scientific reasoning. To this end, we introduce \textbf{Agents-K1}, an end-to-end knowledge orchestration pipeline that converts raw documents into agent-native scientific knowledge graphs. Agents-K1 integrates three components under a unifying theoretical foundation: a multimodal parser whose five-module schema captures entities, multimodal evidence, citations, and typed inter-entity relations across the full paper rather than abstracts alone; a 4B information-extraction backbone trained with GRPO under a rule-based reward; and a graphanything CLI, a tri-source agent interface that unifies web search, multimodal graph retrieval, and cross-document traversal. On top of this, we process 2.46 million scientific papers across six subjects to produce \textbf{Scholar-KG}, of which we release a one-million-paper subset, and the full Scholar-KG is accessible via the SCP link below. The same pipeline can be extended to general-domain corpora and to schema-conformant data synthesis. Extensive experiments demonstrate that Agents-K1 achieves superior performance in scientific information extraction, knowledge graph construction, and multi-hop scientific reasoning.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper introduces Agents-K1, an end-to-end pipeline for converting raw scientific documents into agent-native knowledge graphs. It comprises a multimodal parser using a five-module schema to extract entities, multimodal evidence, citations, and typed relations from full papers (rather than abstracts alone); a 4B-parameter information-extraction model trained via GRPO with rule-based rewards; and a graphanything CLI unifying web search, multimodal retrieval, and cross-document traversal. The pipeline processes 2.46 million papers across six subjects to produce Scholar-KG (with a 1M-paper subset released), and the authors claim it achieves superior performance in scientific information extraction, knowledge graph construction, and multi-hop scientific reasoning.

Significance. If the performance claims and schema completeness are substantiated with rigorous experiments, the work would offer a scalable approach to richer scientific knowledge representations for agents, addressing the limitation of existing methods that rely on abstracts and flat citations. The release of Scholar-KG and the extensible pipeline design would constitute a concrete community resource.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim of superior performance in scientific information extraction, knowledge graph construction, and multi-hop scientific reasoning is asserted without any metrics, baselines, error bars, ablation results, or experimental setup details, rendering the claim unevaluable and load-bearing for the paper's contribution.
  2. [Multimodal parser description] Multimodal parser (five-module schema): the assertion that this schema captures all key entities, claims, evidence, mechanisms, and method lineages essential for scientific reasoning (and is omitted by prior work) is presented without empirical validation such as gold-standard human annotations for recall on mechanisms/method lineages, module ablations, or comparisons establishing exhaustiveness rather than one possible decomposition.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The description of Scholar-KG does not specify the six subjects, selection criteria for the released 1M-paper subset, or access details beyond the SCP link.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on strengthening the presentation of our claims. We address each major comment below with references to the full manuscript and indicate planned revisions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim of superior performance in scientific information extraction, knowledge graph construction, and multi-hop scientific reasoning is asserted without any metrics, baselines, error bars, ablation results, or experimental setup details, rendering the claim unevaluable and load-bearing for the paper's contribution.

    Authors: The abstract is written as a concise summary of the pipeline and claims. Detailed metrics, baselines (including comparisons to prior extraction and reasoning methods), error bars, ablation studies, and experimental setups are provided in the Experiments section of the full manuscript. To address the concern and improve evaluability at a glance, we will revise the abstract to incorporate key quantitative results. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Multimodal parser description] Multimodal parser (five-module schema): the assertion that this schema captures all key entities, claims, evidence, mechanisms, and method lineages essential for scientific reasoning (and is omitted by prior work) is presented without empirical validation such as gold-standard human annotations for recall on mechanisms/method lineages, module ablations, or comparisons establishing exhaustiveness rather than one possible decomposition.

    Authors: The five-module schema is motivated by a systematic analysis of elements required for agent-native scientific reasoning that are absent from abstract-only and flat-citation approaches in prior work. Its utility is shown via downstream task performance and qualitative case studies in the manuscript. We will add a dedicated discussion subsection on schema design rationale, available module ablations, and explicit acknowledgment that direct human-annotated recall studies on mechanisms/method lineages represent an opportunity for future validation. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: claims rest on experimental results and schema design, not self-referential reduction.

full rationale

The paper presents Agents-K1 as an engineering pipeline with a five-module multimodal parser, a trained IE backbone, and a CLI interface, then reports superior performance on IE, KG construction, and reasoning tasks after processing millions of papers. No equations, fitted parameters, or predictions are described that reduce the central claims to inputs by construction. The schema is asserted to capture key scientific elements, but this is a design choice whose downstream effects are evaluated externally via experiments rather than defined tautologically. No self-citation chains or uniqueness theorems are invoked as load-bearing. The derivation is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review provides no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities beyond naming the pipeline components and Scholar-KG output.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5854 in / 1029 out tokens · 25109 ms · 2026-06-27T06:30:44.626527+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. FlowRAG: Synergizing Explicit Reasoning via Frequency-Aware Multi-Granularity Graph Flow

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    FlowRAG adds a quad-level heterogeneous graph with summary hubs and a frequency-aware flow module to improve semantic recall and explicit multi-hop reasoning over prior GraphRAG methods.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 15 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    The ai scientist-v2: Workshop-level automated scientific discovery via agentic tree search

    Yutaro Yamada et al. “The ai scientist-v2: Workshop-level automated scientific discovery via agentic tree search”. In:arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.08066(2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  2. [2]

    NovelSeek: When Agent Becomes the Scientist–Building Closed-Loop System from Hypothesis to Verification

    NovelSeek Team et al. “NovelSeek: When Agent Becomes the Scientist–Building Closed-Loop System from Hypothesis to Verification”. In:arXiv e-prints(2025), arXiv–2505

    2025

  3. [3]

    Internagent-1.5: A unified agentic framework for long-horizon autonomous scientific discovery

    Shiyang Feng et al. “Internagent-1.5: A unified agentic framework for long-horizon autonomous scientific discovery”. In:arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.08990(2026)

    arXiv 2026

  4. [4]

    Towards an AI co-scientist

    Juraj Gottweis et al. “Towards an AI co-scientist”. In:arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.18864(2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  5. [6]

    Hipporag: Neurobiologically inspired long-term memory for large language models

    Bernal Jimenez Gutierrez et al. “Hipporag: Neurobiologically inspired long-term memory for large language models”. In:Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems37 (2024), pp. 59532–59569

    2024

  6. [8]

    GFM-RAG: graph foundation model for retrieval augmented generation

    Linhao Luo et al. “GFM-RAG: graph foundation model for retrieval augmented generation”. In: arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.01113(2025)

    arXiv 2025

  7. [9]

    Yibo Zhao et al.E2GraphRAG: Streamlining Graph-based RAG for High Efficiency and Effectiveness

  8. [10]

    arXiv:2505.24226 [cs.AI].url:https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.24226

    arXiv

  9. [11]

    Parth Sarthi et al.RAPTOR: Recursive Abstractive Processing for Tree-Organized Retrieval. 2024. arXiv:2401.18059 [cs.CL].url:https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.18059

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  10. [12]

    Yu Wang et al.Knowledge Graph Prompting for Multi-Document Question Answering. 2023. arXiv:2308.11730 [cs.CL].url:https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.11730

    arXiv 2023

  11. [13]

    FrontierScience: Evaluating AI’s Ability to Perform Expert-Level Scientific Tasks

    Miles Wang et al. “FrontierScience: Evaluating AI’s Ability to Perform Expert-Level Scientific Tasks”. In:arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.21165(2026)

    arXiv 2026

  12. [14]

    HotpotQA: A dataset for diverse, explainable multi-hop question answering

    Zhilin Yang et al. “HotpotQA: A dataset for diverse, explainable multi-hop question answering”. In:Proceedings of the 2018 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing. 2018, pp. 2369–2380

    2018

  13. [15]

    Constructing a multi-hop qa dataset for comprehensive evaluation of reasoning steps

    Xanh Ho et al. “Constructing a multi-hop qa dataset for comprehensive evaluation of reasoning steps”. In:arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.01060(2020). 35

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  14. [16]

    MuSiQue: Multihop Questions via Single-hop Question Composition

    Harsh Trivedi et al. “MuSiQue: Multihop Questions via Single-hop Question Composition”. In: Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics10 (2022), pp. 539–554

    2022

  15. [17]

    Retrieval-augmented generation for large language models: A survey

    Yunfan Gao et al. “Retrieval-augmented generation for large language models: A survey”. In: arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.10997(2023)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  16. [18]

    RaDAR: Relation-aware Diffusion-Asymmetric Graph Contrastive Learning for Recommendation

    Yixuan Huang et al. “RaDAR: Relation-aware Diffusion-Asymmetric Graph Contrastive Learning for Recommendation”. In:Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2026. 2026, pp. 6445–6456

    2026

  17. [19]

    MLEvolve: A Self-Evolving Framework for Automated Machine Learning Algorithm Discovery

    Shangheng Du et al. “MLEvolve: A Self-Evolving Framework for Automated Machine Learning Algorithm Discovery”. In:arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.06473(2026)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  18. [20]

    Tv-rag: A temporal-aware and semantic entropy-weighted framework for long video retrieval and understanding

    Zongsheng Cao et al. “Tv-rag: A temporal-aware and semantic entropy-weighted framework for long video retrieval and understanding”. In:Proceedings of the 33rd ACM International Conference on Multimedia. 2025, pp. 9071–9079

    2025

  19. [21]

    Rq-rag: Learning to refine queries for retrieval augmented generation

    Chi-Min Chan et al. “Rq-rag: Learning to refine queries for retrieval augmented generation”. In:arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.00610(2024)

    arXiv 2024

  20. [22]

    LightRAG:SimpleandFastRetrieval-AugmentedGeneration

    ZiruiGuoetal.“LightRAG:SimpleandFastRetrieval-AugmentedGeneration”.In:arXivpreprint arXiv:2410.05779(2024)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  21. [23]

    Memorag: Moving towards next-gen rag via memory-inspired knowledge discovery

    Hongjin Qian et al. “Memorag: Moving towards next-gen rag via memory-inspired knowledge discovery”. In:arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.05591(2024)

    arXiv 2024

  22. [24]

    ChunkRAG: Novel LLM-Chunk Filtering Method for RAG Systems

    Ritvik Aggarwal Ishneet Sukhvinder Singh Ibrahim Allahverdiyev et al. “ChunkRAG: Novel LLM-Chunk Filtering Method for RAG Systems”. In:arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.19572(2024)

    arXiv 2024

  23. [25]

    ViG-RAG: Video-aware Graph Retrieval-Augmented Generation via Temporal and Semantic Hybrid Reasoning

    Zongsheng Cao et al. “ViG-RAG: Video-aware Graph Retrieval-Augmented Generation via Temporal and Semantic Hybrid Reasoning”. In:Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Vol. 40. 1. 2026, pp. 48–56

    2026

  24. [26]

    Fromlocaltoglobal:Agraphragapproachtoquery-focusedsummarization

    DarrenEdgeetal.“Fromlocaltoglobal:Agraphragapproachtoquery-focusedsummarization”. In:arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.16130(2024)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  25. [27]

    Simple is effective: The roles of graphs and large lan- guage models in knowledge-graph-based retrieval-augmented generation

    Mufei Li, Siqi Miao, and Pan Li. “Simple is effective: The roles of graphs and large lan- guage models in knowledge-graph-based retrieval-augmented generation”. In:arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.20724(2024)

    arXiv 2024

  26. [28]

    Colpali: Efficient document retrieval with vision language models

    Manuel Faysse et al. “Colpali: Efficient document retrieval with vision language models”. In: arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.01449(2024)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  27. [29]

    Diffusione: Reasoning on knowledge graphs via diffusion-based graph neural networks

    Zongsheng Cao et al. “Diffusione: Reasoning on knowledge graphs via diffusion-based graph neural networks”. In:Proceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 2024, pp. 222–230

    2024

  28. [30]

    Junde Wu et al.Medical Graph RAG: Towards Safe Medical Large Language Model via Graph Retrieval-Augmented Generation. 2024. arXiv:2408.04187 [cs.CV].url: https://arxiv. org/abs/2408.04187

    arXiv 2024

  29. [31]

    Kartik Sharma, Peeyush Kumar, and Yunqing Li.OG-RAG: Ontology-Grounded Retrieval- Augmented Generation For Large Language Models. 2024. arXiv:2412.15235 [cs.CL].url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.15235

    arXiv 2024

  30. [32]

    LeiLiangetal.KAG:BoostingLLMsinProfessionalDomainsviaKnowledgeAugmentedGeneration

  31. [33]

    arXiv:2409.13731 [cs.CL].url:https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.13731

    arXiv

  32. [34]

    Tianyu Fan et al.MiniRAG: Towards Extremely Simple Retrieval-Augmented Generation. 2025. arXiv:2501.06713 [cs.AI].url:https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.06713

    arXiv 2025

  33. [35]

    Jinyu Wang et al.PIKE-RAG: sPecIalized KnowledgE and Rationale Augmented Generation. 2025. arXiv:2501.11551 [cs.CL].url:https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.11551. 36

    arXiv 2025

  34. [36]

    Boyu Chen et al.PathRAG: Pruning Graph-based Retrieval Augmented Generation with Relational Paths. 2025. arXiv:2502.14902 [cs.CL].url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.14902

    arXiv 2025

  35. [37]

    Bernal Jiménez Gutiérrez et al.From RAG to Memory: Non-Parametric Continual Learning for Large Language Models. 2025. arXiv:2502.14802 [cs.CL].url: https://arxiv.org/ abs/2502.14802

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  36. [38]

    FlowSearch: Advancing deep research with dynamic structured knowledge flow

    Yusong Hu et al. “FlowSearch: Advancing deep research with dynamic structured knowledge flow”. In:arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.08521(2025)

    arXiv 2025

  37. [39]

    AutoMLGen: Navigating Fine-Grained Optimization for Coding Agents

    Shangheng Du et al. “AutoMLGen: Navigating Fine-Grained Optimization for Coding Agents”. In:arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.08511(2025)

    arXiv 2025

  38. [40]

    Tongyi deepresearch technical report

    Tongyi DeepResearch Team et al. “Tongyi deepresearch technical report”. In:arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.24701(2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  39. [41]

    Webthinker:Empoweringlargereasoningmodelswithdeepresearchcapability

    XiaoxiLietal.“Webthinker:Empoweringlargereasoningmodelswithdeepresearchcapability”. In:arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.21776(2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  40. [42]

    DualResearch: Entropy-Gated Dual-Graph Retrieval for Answer Reconstruc- tion

    Jinxin Shi et al. “DualResearch: Entropy-Gated Dual-Graph Retrieval for Answer Reconstruc- tion”. In:arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.08959(2025)

    arXiv 2025

  41. [43]

    https://openai.com/research/deep-research

    OpenAI.DeepResearch. https://openai.com/research/deep-research . Accessed: 2025-09-24. 2025

    2025

  42. [44]

    Accessed: 2025-09-24

    Google DeepMind.Gemini Deep Research.https://deepmind.google/technologies/ gemini/deep-research/. Accessed: 2025-09-24. 2024

    2025

  43. [45]

    DeepSeek-AI et al.DeepSeek-V3 Technical Report. 2025. arXiv:2412.19437 [cs.CL].url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.19437

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  44. [46]

    OpenAI et al.GPT-4 Technical Report. 2024. arXiv:2303.08774 [cs.CL].url: https: //arxiv.org/abs/2303.08774

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  45. [47]

    Aaron Grattafiori et al.The Llama 3 Herd of Models. 2024. arXiv:2407.21783[cs.AI] .url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.21783

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  46. [48]

    We build upon

    Xiaoxin He et al.G-Retriever: Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Textual Graph Understanding and Question Answering. 2024. arXiv:2402.07630 [cs.LG].url: https://arxiv.org/ abs/2402.07630. 37 Appendix A. Citation Context Classification Schema To precisely quantify the intellectual lineage and contextual dependency of the referenced literature, we formulate...

    arXiv 2024