pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.18598 · v1 · pith:S4T7XT4Rnew · submitted 2026-06-17 · 💻 cs.AI · cs.LG

Optimizing Lithium Production Decisions under Geological, Demand, and Pricing Uncertainties: A POMDP Framework for Multi-Objective Decision Making

Anna C. Edmonds , Mansur M. Arief , Robert J. Moss , Mykel J. Kochenderfer , Jef Caers This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 21:29 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.AI cs.LG
keywords lithium productionPOMDPdecision making under uncertaintymining optimizationbelief state planningprice uncertaintyextraction technologymulti-objective optimization
0
0 comments X

The pith

A POMDP model lets lithium producers adapt mine opening, extraction methods, and timing to uncertain prices and geology.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper models lithium production choices, including which mines to open and which extraction technology to use, as a partially observable Markov decision process that tracks geological, demand, and pricing uncertainties. It solves the model with belief state planning methods that maintain probability distributions over hidden states. Across tested price paths and deposit scenarios the resulting policies achieve higher demand fulfillment and more balanced economic-environmental results than human-inspired heuristics. The advantage comes from the planner's ability to revise actions as new information arrives about prices and reserves.

Core claim

We frame the problem as a partially observable Markov decision process (POMDP) and solve using belief state planning methods to get optimal decision making. POMDP solvers outperform human inspired heuristics by dynamically adapting to shifting lithium price regimes (static, linear, exponential, and stochastic) through belief state planning and explicit uncertainty management. By optimally sequencing exploration, production, and technology choice, the framework achieves higher demand fulfillment and more balanced economic environmental outcomes over the projects lifetime in all different pricing and deposit scenarios.

What carries the argument

A partially observable Markov decision process whose state includes uncertain lithium reserves, demand levels, and price paths, solved by maintaining and updating a belief distribution over those hidden variables.

If this is right

  • Optimal policies sequence exploration, production start, and technology switches in response to observed price movements.
  • Demand fulfillment rises relative to heuristic rules in static, linear, exponential, and stochastic price regimes.
  • Economic and environmental objectives reach a better balance over the full project horizon.
  • The same planning loop works across multiple deposit scenarios without manual retuning.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The belief-update step could incorporate real-time market signals or drilling results to tighten uncertainty faster than the current model allows.
  • Extending the state to include permitting delays or supply-chain bottlenecks would test whether the same solver still dominates heuristics.
  • National strategic planners could use the framework to evaluate how different price-support policies affect long-term lithium availability.

Load-bearing premise

The POMDP accurately represents the joint uncertainties in geology, demand, and prices together with the available extraction technologies, and the belief-state policies found in simulation generalize to new price paths and deposits.

What would settle it

Run the POMDP policy on a sequence of actual historical lithium prices and realized deposit outcomes, then compare cumulative demand met and net present value against the same sequence executed by the human heuristics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.18598 by Anna C. Edmonds, Jef Caers, Mansur M. Arief, Mykel J. Kochenderfer, Robert J. Moss.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Pricing Models with their Standard Deviation over Time period [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Average over 30 simulations of deposit belief uncertainty evolution for sites 1-4 under three policies (POMCPOW, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Action timeline over the 29-year horizon showing belief uncertainty and action selection for four policies. All [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Pareto Curve for Linear Pricing The model’s performance across 𝛼 values shows that POMCPOW adapts smoothly to shifting objective weights, maintaining stable and consistent trade-offs even under complex, nonlinear price dynamics. Heuristic policies, by contrast, exhibit rigid behavior optimizing for one goal at the expense of the other resulting in static profit and emissions given the 𝛼 value. POMCPOW achi… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Decision making in lithium production is challenging, whether from an investor's perspective or a strategic production standpoint. Determining which mines to open and when to open them involves not only geological and price uncertainties, but also complexities around the choice of extraction method, from direct lithium extraction to hard rock mining. Prior work explored models of this problem and different methods to optimize mining decisions; these models did not account for uncertainty in pricing, uncertainty in demand, or different mining technologies to extract lithium. Incorporating different pricing models and extraction technology into these models enables more robust strategies for determining not only when and where to open a mine, but also which method of production to pursue. We frame the problem as a partially observable Markov decision process (POMDP) and solve using belief state planning methods to get optimal decision making. In our study, we show that POMDP solvers outperform human inspired heuristics by dynamically adapting to shifting lithium price regimes (static, linear, exponential, and stochastic) through belief state planning and explicit uncertainty management. By optimally sequencing exploration, production, and technology choice, the framework achieves higher demand fulfillment and more balanced economic environmental outcomes over the projects lifetime in all different pricing and deposit scenarios.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript frames lithium production decisions (mine opening, sequencing of exploration/production, and choice between DLE and hard-rock extraction) as a POMDP that incorporates geological deposit uncertainty, demand uncertainty, and four pricing regimes (static, linear, exponential, stochastic). It claims that belief-state planning solvers outperform human-inspired heuristics by dynamically adapting to price shifts and deliver higher demand fulfillment together with more balanced economic-environmental outcomes across all tested regimes and deposit scenarios.

Significance. If the POMDP formulation, transition/ observation models, and quantitative outperformance were rigorously demonstrated, the work could supply a decision-support tool for a strategically important mineral under multiple uncertainty sources. The manuscript supplies none of the required technical elements, however, so significance cannot be evaluated.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract (second paragraph): the central claim that 'POMDP solvers outperform human inspired heuristics' and achieve 'higher demand fulfillment and more balanced economic environmental outcomes' is asserted without any supporting quantitative results, model equations, state-space cardinalities, transition or observation models, reward function, solver (POMCP/SARSOP/etc.), planning horizon, or experimental tables.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: no definition is given of the POMDP tuple (states, actions, observations, T, O, R), the price-regime transition matrix, the drilling observation model, or the multi-objective reward components, rendering the weakest assumption (that the formulation accurately captures the uncertainties and that belief-state planning generalizes) untestable.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their review and constructive feedback. We agree that the submitted manuscript does not provide the detailed technical elements required to substantiate the claims in the abstract. We will undertake a major revision to incorporate the POMDP tuple definitions, transition and observation models, reward function, solver information, planning horizon, and experimental results with tables.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (second paragraph): the central claim that 'POMDP solvers outperform human inspired heuristics' and achieve 'higher demand fulfillment and more balanced economic environmental outcomes' is asserted without any supporting quantitative results, model equations, state-space cardinalities, transition or observation models, reward function, solver (POMCP/SARSOP/etc.), planning horizon, or experimental tables.

    Authors: We acknowledge this point. The current manuscript version does not include these supporting elements. In the revised version, we will add quantitative results from our experiments, model equations, state space details, and experimental tables to the abstract where appropriate or ensure they are clearly presented early in the paper. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: no definition is given of the POMDP tuple (states, actions, observations, T, O, R), the price-regime transition matrix, the drilling observation model, or the multi-objective reward components, rendering the weakest assumption (that the formulation accurately captures the uncertainties and that belief-state planning generalizes) untestable.

    Authors: We agree that without these definitions, the claims cannot be properly evaluated. The revised manuscript will include explicit definitions of the POMDP components (S, A, O, T, O, R), the price regime models, drilling observation model, and the multi-objective reward function, along with the solver used and planning horizon. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: POMDP claims rest on empirical solver comparisons, not self-referential definitions or fitted predictions

full rationale

The paper frames lithium decisions as a POMDP and asserts that belief-state solvers outperform heuristics across price regimes and deposit scenarios. No equations, transition models, reward functions, or parameter-fitting steps appear in the provided text. No self-citations are invoked to justify uniqueness or to rename prior results as new derivations. The outperformance claim is presented as an empirical outcome of running POMDP planners versus heuristics; it does not reduce to a fitted input being relabeled as a prediction, nor to any self-definitional loop. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks (solver performance on the stated scenarios) and receives the default non-circularity finding.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only abstract available; no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are described or can be extracted.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5769 in / 1130 out tokens · 28493 ms · 2026-06-26T21:29:24.306307+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 17 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Impact of critical mineral prices on energy transition

    Attílio LA. Impact of critical mineral prices on energy transition. Applied Energy 2025; 377:124688.doi:10. 1016/j.apenergy.2024.124688

    arXiv 2025

  2. [2]

    Net Zero by 2050: A Roadmap for the Global Energy Sector

    International Energy Agency. Net Zero by 2050: A Roadmap for the Global Energy Sector. Paris: International Energy Agency, 2021. Available from:https://www.iea.org/reports/net-zero-by-2050

    2050

  3. [3]

    Available from:https://www.iea.org/reports/the-role-of-critical-minerals-in- clean-energy-transitions

    InternationalEnergyAgency.TheRoleofCriticalMineralsinCleanEnergyTransitions.Paris:InternationalEnergy Agency, 2021. Available from:https://www.iea.org/reports/the-role-of-critical-minerals-in- clean-energy-transitions

    2021

  4. [4]

    Future material demand for automotive lithium-based batteries

    Xu C, Dai Q, Gaines L, Hu M, Tukker A, and Steubing B. Future material demand for automotive lithium-based batteries. Communications Materials 2020; 1.doi:10.1038/s43246-020-00095-x 21

    work page doi:10.1038/s43246-020-00095-x 2020

  5. [5]

    Giurco D, Dominish E, Florin N, Watari T, and McLellan B. Requirements for Minerals and Metals for 100% RenewableScenarios.AchievingtheParisClimateAgreementGoals:GlobalandRegional100%RenewableEnergy Scenarios with Non-energy GHG Pathways for +1.5°C and +2°C. Ed. by Teske S. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019 :437–57.doi:10.1007/978-3-030-05843-2_11

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-030-05843-2_11 2019

  6. [6]

    Available from:https://www.oxfordenergy.org/wpcms/wp-content/uploads/ 2024/02/Insight-145-Lithium-Price-Volatility.pdf

    MehdiA.LithiumPriceVolatility:WhereNextfortheMarket?EnergyInsight145.Oxford,UK:OxfordInstitutefor Energy Studies, 2024 Feb. Available from:https://www.oxfordenergy.org/wpcms/wp-content/uploads/ 2024/02/Insight-145-Lithium-Price-Volatility.pdf

    2024

  7. [7]

    International Energy Agency. Lithium. 2024. Available from:https://www.iea.org/reports/lithium

    2024

  8. [8]

    2024.Available from:https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/charts/global-lithium-demand-in-the-net- zero-scenario-2023-2040

    InternationalEnergyAgency.GloballithiumdemandintheNetZeroScenario,2023–2040(chart). 2024.Available from:https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/charts/global-lithium-demand-in-the-net- zero-scenario-2023-2040

    2023

  9. [9]

    Global lithium resources: Relative importance of pegmatite, brine and other deposits

    Kesler SE, Gruber PW, Medina PA, Keoleian GA, Everson MP, and Wallington TJ. Global lithium resources: Relative importance of pegmatite, brine and other deposits. Ore Geology Reviews 2012; 48:55–69.doi:https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2012.05.006

    work page doi:10.1016/j.oregeorev.2012.05.006 2012

  10. [10]

    Lithium isotope geochemistry and origin of Canadian Shield brines

    Bottomley DJ, Chan LH, Katz A, Starinsky A, and Clark ID. Lithium isotope geochemistry and origin of Canadian Shield brines. Groundwater 2003; 41:847–56

    2003

  11. [11]

    Lithium brine mining affects geodiversity and Sustainable Develop- ment Goals

    Rentier ES, Hoorn C, and Seijmonsbergen AC. Lithium brine mining affects geodiversity and Sustainable Develop- ment Goals. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2024; 202:114642

    2024

  12. [12]

    Lithium facts

    Natural Resources Canada. Lithium facts. 2025. Available from:https://natural- resources.canada.ca/ minerals-mining/mining-data-statistics-analysis/minerals-metals-facts/lithium-facts

    2025

  13. [13]

    Journal of Environmental Management 2025; 392:126725.doi:10.1016/j.jenvman

    WuJY,YuB,WangG,andWeiYM.Lithiumpriceuncertaintiesduetothedevelopmentofbatterytechnologyunder carbon neutrality target. Journal of Environmental Management 2025; 392:126725.doi:10.1016/j.jenvman. 2025.126725

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jenvman 2025

  14. [14]

    Bubble behaviors in lithium price and the contagion effect: An industry chain perspective

    Wang XQ, Qin M, Moldovan NC, and Su CW. Bubble behaviors in lithium price and the contagion effect: An industry chain perspective. Resources Policy 2023; 83:103725.doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103725

    work page doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103725 2023

  15. [15]

    Direct lithium extraction: A new paradigm for lithium production and resource utilization

    Farahbakhsh J, Arshadi F, Mofidi Z, Mohseni-Dargah M, Kök C, Assefi M, Soozanipour A, Zargar M, Asadnia M, Boroumand Y, Presser V, and Razmjou A. Direct lithium extraction: A new paradigm for lithium production and resource utilization. Desalination 2024; 575:117249.doi:10.1016/j.desal.2023.117249

    work page doi:10.1016/j.desal.2023.117249 2024

  16. [16]

    Direct Lithium Extraction: A potential game changing technology

    Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research. Direct Lithium Extraction: A potential game changing technology

  17. [17]

    Available from:https://www.goldmansachs.com/pdfs/insights/pages/gs- research/direct- lithium-extraction/report.pdf

  18. [19]

    Comparative life cycle assessment of lithium mining, extraction, and refining technologies: a global perspective

    Khakmardan S, Rolinck M, Cerdas F, Herrmann C, Giurco D, Crawford R, and Li W. Comparative life cycle assessment of lithium mining, extraction, and refining technologies: a global perspective. Procedia CIRP 2023; 116:606–11.doi:10.1016/j.procir.2023.02.102

    work page doi:10.1016/j.procir.2023.02.102 2023

  19. [20]

    Halkes RT, Hughes A, Wall F, Petavratzi E, Pell R, and Lindsay JJ. Life cycle assessment and water use impacts of lithiumproductionfromsalardeposits:Challengesandopportunities.Resources,ConservationandRecycling 2024; 207:107554.doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107554

    work page doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107554 2024

  20. [21]

    When Are Real Options Exercised? An Empirical Study of Mine Closings

    Moel A and Tufano P. When Are Real Options Exercised? An Empirical Study of Mine Closings. The Review of Financial Studies 2015 Jun; 15:35–64.doi:10.1093/rfs/15.1.35

    work page doi:10.1093/rfs/15.1.35 2015

  21. [22]

    A numerical study for a mining project using real options valuation under commodity price uncertainty

    Haque MA, Topal E, and Lilford E. A numerical study for a mining project using real options valuation under commodity price uncertainty. Resources Policy 2014; 39:115–23.doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2013.12.004

    work page doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2013.12.004 2014

  22. [23]

    Resources Policy 2024; 99:105423.doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105423

    Buarque Andrade L, Frenzel M, Bookhagen B, Kresse C, Schmidt M, Nassar N, Alonso E, Shojaeddini E, and SandmannD.Fromexplorationtoproduction:Understandingthedevelopmentdynamicsoflithiumminingprojects. Resources Policy 2024; 99:105423.doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105423

    work page doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105423 2024

  23. [24]

    Managing Geological Uncertainty in Critical Mineral Supply Chains: A POMDP Approach with Application to US Lithium Resources

    Arief M, Alonso Y, Oshiro C, Xu W, Corso A, Yin DZ, Caers JK, and Kochenderfer MJ. Managing Geological Uncertainty in Critical Mineral Supply Chains: A POMDP Approach with Application to US Lithium Resources. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.05690 2025

    arXiv 2025

  24. [25]

    Algorithms for Decision Making

    Kochenderfer MJ, Wheeler TA, and Wray KH. Algorithms for Decision Making. MIT Press, 2022

    2022

  25. [26]

    Sensitivity Analysis for Business, Technology, and Policymaking: Made Easy with Simulation Decomposition (SimDec)

    Kozlova M and Yeomans JS. Sensitivity Analysis for Business, Technology, and Policymaking: Made Easy with Simulation Decomposition (SimDec). 1st ed. Routledge, 2024.doi:10.4324/9781003453789

    work page doi:10.4324/9781003453789 2024

  26. [27]

    Online Planning Algorithms for POMDPs

    Ross S, Pineau J, Paquet S, and Chaib-draa B. Online Planning Algorithms for POMDPs. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 2008; 33:151–224.doi:10.1613/jair.2546 22

    work page doi:10.1613/jair.2546 2008

  27. [28]

    MoonC,WhateleyMKG,andEvansAM,eds.IntroductiontoMineralExploration.2nded.Wiley-Blackwell, 2009 Mar :496

    2009

  28. [29]

    Generalised geometric Brownian motion: Theory and applications to option pricing

    Stojkoski V, Sandev T, Basnarkov L, Kocarev L, and Metzler R. Generalised geometric Brownian motion: Theory and applications to option pricing. Entropy 2020; 22:1432

    2020

  29. [30]

    Geological Survey, National Minerals Information Center

    U.S. Geological Survey, National Minerals Information Center. Lithium Statistics and Information. 2025. Avail- able from:https : / / www . usgs . gov / centers / national - minerals - information - center / lithium - statistics-and-information

    2025

  30. [31]

    Average lithium carbonate price from 2010 to 2024 (in U.S

    Statista. Average lithium carbonate price from 2010 to 2024 (in U.S. dollars per metric ton). Available from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/606350/battery-grade-lithium-carbonate-price/

    2010

  31. [32]

    The rise and fall of American lithium

    Miatto A, Reck BK, West J, and Graedel TE. The rise and fall of American lithium. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 2020; 162:105034.doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105034

    work page doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105034 2020

  32. [33]

    Technical Report EPA–HQ–OAR–2021–0317

    U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency.EPAReportontheSocialCostofGreenhouseGases:EstimatesIncorporating Recent Scientific Advances. Technical Report EPA–HQ–OAR–2021–0317. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2023. Available from:https : / / www . epa . gov / system / files / documents / 2023 - 12/epa_scghg_2023_report_final.pdf

    2021

  33. [34]

    Beyond the Kalman Filter: Particle Filters for Tracking Applications

    Ristic B, Arulampalam S, and Gordon N. Beyond the Kalman Filter: Particle Filters for Tracking Applications. Artech House, 2004

    2004

  34. [35]

    Discrete Event Dynamic Systems 2009; 19:377–422

    ChongEKP,KreucherCM,andHeroAO.PartiallyobservableMarkovdecisionprocessapproximationsforadaptive sensing. Discrete Event Dynamic Systems 2009; 19:377–422

    2009

  35. [36]

    2024.Availablefrom:https://juliapomdp

    EgorovM,TianZ,andKochenderferMJ.POMDPs.jlDocumentation. 2024.Availablefrom:https://juliapomdp. github.io/POMDPs.jl/latest/def_solver/

    2024

  36. [37]

    A sequential decision-making framework with uncertainty quantification for groundwater management

    Wang Y, Zechner M, Mern JM, Kochenderfer MJ, and Caers JK. A sequential decision-making framework with uncertainty quantification for groundwater management. Advances in Water Resources 2022; 166:104266.doi: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2022.104266

    work page doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2022.104266 2022

  37. [38]

    Online algorithms for POMDPs with continuous state, action, and observation spaces.Proceedings of the International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling

    Sunberg Z and Kochenderfer M. Online algorithms for POMDPs with continuous state, action, and observation spaces.Proceedings of the International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling. Vol. 28. 2018 :259– 63.doi:10.1609/icaps.v28i1.13882

    work page doi:10.1609/icaps.v28i1.13882 2018

  38. [39]

    2023.Availablefrom:https://www.nasdaq.com/press- release/standard- lithium- announces- positive- results- of- definitive- feasibility- study- for-first

    StandardLithiumLtd.StandardLithiumAnnouncesPositiveResultsofDefinitiveFeasibilityStudyforFirstCommer- cialLithiumExtractionPlantatLANXESSSouthPlant. 2023.Availablefrom:https://www.nasdaq.com/press- release/standard- lithium- announces- positive- results- of- definitive- feasibility- study- for-first

    2023

  39. [40]

    Kachi Project Phase One Definitive Feasibility Study (DFS)

    Lake Resources N.L. Kachi Project Phase One Definitive Feasibility Study (DFS). 2023. Available from:https: //lakeresources.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/lke_kachi-dfs_19-dec-23.pdf

    2023

  40. [41]

    Paradox Lithium Project DFS Confirms Outstanding Economics and ESG Creden- tials for Phase 1 Lithium Development

    Anson Resources Limited. Paradox Lithium Project DFS Confirms Outstanding Economics and ESG Creden- tials for Phase 1 Lithium Development. 2022. Available from:https : / / cdn - api . markitdigital . com / apiman - gateway / ASX / asx - research / 1 . 0 / file / 2924 - 02565661 - 6A1108595 ? access _ token = 83ff96335c2d45a094df02a206a39ff4

    2022

  41. [42]

    NOA Lithium Announces Positive Preliminary Economic Assessment Results for Rio GrandeProject

    NOA Lithium Brines Inc. NOA Lithium Announces Positive Preliminary Economic Assessment Results for Rio GrandeProject. 2025.Availablefrom:https://www.noalithium.com/_resources/news/nr-20251006.pdf

    2025

  42. [43]

    The Future of Canadian Lithium - Corporate Presentation

    E3 Lithium Ltd. The Future of Canadian Lithium - Corporate Presentation. 2025. Available from:https://www. e3lithium.ca/_resources/presentations/corporate-presentation.pdf?v=0.597

    2025

  43. [44]

    2021.Availablefrom:https://www.riotinto

    RioTinto.RioTintoCommitsFundingforJadarLithiumProject. 2021.Availablefrom:https://www.riotinto. com/en/news/releases/2021/rio-tinto-commits-funding-for-jadar-lithium-project

    2021

  44. [45]

    Lithium Americas Increases Mineral Resource and Reserve for Thacker Pass

    Morgan V. Lithium Americas Increases Mineral Resource and Reserve for Thacker Pass. 2025. Available from: https://lithiumamericas.com/news/news-details/2025/Lithium-Americas-Increases-Mineral- Resource-and-reserve-for-thacker-pass/default.aspx

    2025

  45. [46]

    Feasibility Study Estimates Net Present Value of US$1.25 Billion and Internal Rate of Return of 26% for the Sonora Lithium Project

    Bacanora Minerals Ltd. Feasibility Study Estimates Net Present Value of US$1.25 Billion and Internal Rate of Return of 26% for the Sonora Lithium Project. 2017. Available from:https://www.juniorminingnetwork. com / junior - miner - news / press - releases / 924 - tsx - venture / bcn / 39480 - bacanora - minerals - feasibility-study-estimates-net-present-v...

    2017

  46. [47]

    Falchani Project Preliminary Economic Assessment — Technical Report

    Clarke S. Falchani Project Preliminary Economic Assessment — Technical Report. 2024. Available from:https: //americanlithiumcorp.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/NR-Filing_Falchani_-PEA_Technical- Report-Feb-2024-vFinal.pdf 23

    2024

  47. [48]

    2018.Availablefrom:https://mb.cision.com/Public/14755/2547948/b83a99f0255413fe

    KeliberOy.Report. 2018.Availablefrom:https://mb.cision.com/Public/14755/2547948/b83a99f0255413fe. pdf

    2018

  48. [49]

    Lord D, Etheridge M, Willson M, Hall G, and Uttley P. Measuring exploration success: An alternative to the discovery-cost-per-ouncemethodofquantifyingexplorationeffectiveness.SEGDiscovery 2001;45.doi:10.5382/ SEGnews.2001-45.fea/607592

    2001

  49. [50]

    Geological Introduction to E3 Metals Corp

    Eccles R. Geological Introduction to E3 Metals Corp. Clearwater and Exshaw Lithium-Brine Properties in South- Central Alberta. Tech. rep. Edmonton, Alberta, Canada: APEX Geoscience Ltd., prepared for E3 Metals Corp.,

  50. [51]

    Available from:https://e3lithium.ca/_resources/reports/technical/170518_E3+Metals+ Corp_Geo+Intro+43-101.pdf?v=090904%3Fv%3D1753383969

  51. [52]

    Batteries 2021; 7:57.doi:10.3390/batteries7030057

    ManjongNB,UsaiL,BurheimOS,andStrømmanAH.LifeCycleModellingofExtractionandProcessingofBattery Minerals—A Parametric Approach. Batteries 2021; 7:57.doi:10.3390/batteries7030057

    work page doi:10.3390/batteries7030057 2021

  52. [53]

    Lithium Production

    Ritchie H and Roser M. Lithium Production. 2025. Available from:https://archive.ourworldindata.org/ 20250717-120101/grapher/lithium-production.html

    2025

  53. [54]

    EnergyInstitute.StatisticalReviewofWorldEnergy2024(73rdEdition).Tech.rep.EnergyInstitute, 2024.Available from:https://www.energyinst.org/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/1542714/684_EI_Stat_Review_ V16_DIGITAL.pdf 24

    2024