pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.20870 · v1 · pith:TOJKTCTGnew · submitted 2026-06-18 · 🧮 math.AP

Classification of the dynamics of radial solutions to the 2D parabolic-elliptic Keller-Segel System

Federico Buseghin , Charles Collot This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 16:07 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.AP
keywords Keller-Segel systemradial solutionsasymptotic classificationcritical massblow-upself-similar solutionsparabolic-elliptic
0
0 comments X

The pith

Radial solutions to the 2D Keller-Segel system follow one of three mass-dependent asymptotic regimes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper unifies earlier separate results into one classification for all radial initial data with finite second momentum. Depending on the mass, the solutions either spread out to a self-similar expander, concentrate slowly around a stationary profile, or blow up in finite time. The critical-mass case at 8π, which fills the last gap in the picture, was established in a companion paper. The trichotomy therefore covers every radial datum of finite second momentum and shows how each regime matches known persistence results outside the radial setting.

Core claim

For radial solutions with finite second momentum the flow exhibits three distinct asymptotic regimes. Subcritical mass produces convergence to the unique self-similar expander of the same mass. At the critical mass 8π solutions concentrate in infinite time around the stationary state with a universal logarithmic rate. Supercritical mass produces type-II finite-time blow-up with an explicit universal rate and the stationary state as profile.

What carries the argument

The mass trichotomy that partitions the long-time behavior of radial solutions into subcritical spreading, critical logarithmic concentration, and supercritical type-II blow-up.

If this is right

  • Every radial solution with mass below 8π converges to the same self-similar expander.
  • Every radial solution with mass exactly 8π concentrates around the stationary state at the universal logarithmic rate.
  • Every radial solution with mass above 8π undergoes type-II blow-up with the explicit universal rate and stationary profile.
  • The three regimes remain possible even when radial symmetry or finite second momentum is dropped, as shown by separate known constructions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The classification isolates radial symmetry as the condition that eliminates all other possible long-time behaviors.
  • Numerical simulations of the critical-mass case could directly measure the logarithmic concentration rate.
  • The same trichotomy may serve as a template for classifying radial solutions in related aggregation-diffusion equations.

Load-bearing premise

Radial symmetry together with finite second momentum, plus the critical-mass concentration result established only in the companion paper.

What would settle it

A radial initial datum with finite second momentum and mass exactly 8π whose solution fails to concentrate around the stationary state at the claimed logarithmic rate would falsify the classification.

read the original abstract

This note gives a complete classification of the asymptotic behavior of radial solutions to the two-dimensional parabolic-elliptic Keller-Segel system on the whole space, for general initial data in the large. We review previous separate results, and unify them within a single classification framework. Depending on the mass, the flow exhibits three distinct asymptotic regimes. For a subcritical mass, solutions converge toward the unique self-similar expander of same mass. At the critical mass $8\pi$, solutions concentrate in infinite time around the stationary state with a universal logarithmic rate. The determination of this behaviour was the last missing step for achieving a complete radial classification, and we prove it in a companion paper (in fact without radial assumption). For a supercritical mass, solutions undergo type II finite-time blow-up with an explicit universal asymptotic rate and the stationary state as profile. This trichotomy holds for all radial initial data with finite second momentum. For non-radial data or infinite second momentum, it is known that other dynamics can be possible; for each of these three universal regimes we review the known results showing how they persist.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. This note unifies prior results into a trichotomy for the asymptotic behavior of radial solutions to the 2D parabolic-elliptic Keller-Segel system on R^2 with finite second moment: subcritical mass yields convergence to the unique self-similar expander of the same mass; critical mass 8π yields infinite-time concentration around the stationary state with a universal logarithmic rate (proved in a companion paper, without radial assumption); supercritical mass yields type II finite-time blow-up with explicit universal rate and the stationary state as profile. The classification is stated to hold for all such radial data, with other behaviors possible outside radial symmetry or finite second moment.

Significance. If the companion result holds, the manuscript completes the radial classification by assembling separate prior results into one framework, explicitly crediting the companion paper for the critical-mass step and reviewing persistence of the regimes. This provides a clear reference point for the known universal behaviors under the stated assumptions.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the trichotomy is presented as complete for radial finite-second-moment data, yet the critical-mass regime (described as the last missing step) is proved only in the companion paper, which is not reproduced here. This dependence is load-bearing for the central claim of a unified classification.
minor comments (2)
  1. The manuscript could include a short table or bullet list summarizing the three regimes (mass threshold, asymptotic behavior, rate/profile, and key references) to improve readability of the classification.
  2. Clarify in the text whether the explicit universal rates for the subcritical and supercritical cases are derived within this note or taken from the cited prior works.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment and the recommendation of minor revision. The manuscript is a short unifying note whose central contribution is to assemble previously separate results into a single trichotomy framework under the stated assumptions, with explicit credit to the companion paper for the critical-mass case.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the trichotomy is presented as complete for radial finite-second-moment data, yet the critical-mass regime (described as the last missing step) is proved only in the companion paper, which is not reproduced here. This dependence is load-bearing for the central claim of a unified classification.

    Authors: The manuscript already states the dependence transparently: the abstract notes that 'the determination of this behaviour was the last missing step ... and we prove it in a companion paper (in fact without radial assumption)', and the introduction repeats that the critical-mass step is handled elsewhere. The note's purpose is to unify the three regimes into one classification statement, review persistence results for each regime, and record that the trichotomy holds for all radial data with finite second moment. Reproducing the companion proof would change the scope from a unifying note to a full self-contained paper, which is not the stated goal. The claim of a 'complete classification' is therefore conditional on the companion result, as the referee correctly observes, but this condition is already disclosed rather than hidden. revision: no

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Classification assembles external results; minor self-citation to companion for critical-mass case

full rationale

The paper reviews and unifies prior separate results on subcritical, critical, and supercritical regimes into a trichotomy for radial data with finite second momentum. The sole self-citation is the explicit deferral of the critical-mass logarithmic concentration result to a companion paper (proved without radial symmetry). This does not create circularity because the present note does not derive or fit any quantity from its own inputs; it assembles known external theorems. No self-definitional steps, fitted-input predictions, ansatz smuggling, or renaming of known results occur. The central claim remains independent of any internal reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The classification rests on the standard parabolic-elliptic Keller-Segel equations and on prior theorems for subcritical and supercritical regimes; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in this note.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The 2D parabolic-elliptic Keller-Segel system on R^2 with radial symmetry
    The paper studies solutions of this specific system.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5725 in / 1105 out tokens · 39821 ms · 2026-06-26T16:07:08.225363+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Bedrossian and N

    J. Bedrossian and N. Masmoudi,Existence, uniqueness and Lipschitz dependence for Patlak–Keller–Segel and Navier– Stokes inR 2 with measure-valued initial data, Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, Volume 214, Issue 3 (2014), Pages 717–801

    2014

  2. [2]

    Biler,The Cauchy problem and self-similar solutions for a nonlinear parabolic equation, Studia Mathematica, Volume 114, Issue 2 (1995), Pages 181–205

    P. Biler,The Cauchy problem and self-similar solutions for a nonlinear parabolic equation, Studia Mathematica, Volume 114, Issue 2 (1995), Pages 181–205

    1995

  3. [3]

    Biler,Local and global solvability of some parabolic systems modelling chemotaxis, Advances in Mathematical Sciences and Applications, Volume 8 (1998), Pages 715–743

    P. Biler,Local and global solvability of some parabolic systems modelling chemotaxis, Advances in Mathematical Sciences and Applications, Volume 8 (1998), Pages 715–743

    1998

  4. [4]

    Biler,Singularities of Solutions to Chemotaxis Systems, De Gruyter Series in Mathematics and Life Sciences, Vol

    P. Biler,Singularities of Solutions to Chemotaxis Systems, De Gruyter Series in Mathematics and Life Sciences, Vol. 6, De Gruyter, 2019

    2019

  5. [5]

    Biler, G

    P. Biler, G. Karch, P. Lauren¸ cot, T. NadziejaThe8π-problem for radially symmetric solutions of a chemotaxis model in a disc, Topological Methods in Nonlinear Analysis Journal of the Juliusz Schauder Center Volume 27, 2006, 133–147

    2006

  6. [6]

    Blanchet, V

    A. Blanchet, V. Calvez, J. A. CarrilloConvergence of the mass-transport steepest descent scheme for the subcritical Patlak-Keller-Segel modelSIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, Vol. 46, Iss. 2 (2008) CLASSIFICATION OF THE DYNAMICS OF THE 2D KELLER–SEGEL SYSTEM 19

    2008

  7. [7]

    Blanchet, E

    A. Blanchet, E. Carlen, J. A. CarrilloFunctional inequalities, thick tails and asymptotics for the critical mass Pat- lak–Keller–Segel modelJournal of Functional Analysis Volume 262, Issue 5, 1 March 2012, Pages 2142-2230

    2012

  8. [8]

    Blanchet, J

    A. Blanchet, J. A. Carrillo, N. MasmoudiInfinite time aggregation for the critical Patlak-Keller-Segel model inR 2, Communications on Pure and Applied MathematicsVolume 61, Issue 10 pp. 1449-1481

  9. [9]

    Blanchet, J

    A. Blanchet, J. Dolbeault, M. Escobedo and J. Fern´ andez,Asymptotic behaviour for small mass in the two-dimensional parabolic-elliptic Keller–Segel model, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, Volume 361, Issue 2 (2010), Pages 533–542

    2010

  10. [10]

    Blanchet, J

    A. Blanchet, J. Dolbeault, B. PerthameTwo-dimensional Keller-Segel model: optimal critical mass and qualitative properties of the solutionsElectron. J. Differential Equations, (2006), pp. No. 44, 32

    2006

  11. [11]

    Brezis & T

    H. Brezis & T. CazenaveA nonlinear heat equation with singular initial dataJ. Anal. Math. 68, 277–304 (1996)

    1996

  12. [12]

    Buseghin & C

    F. Buseghin & C. CollotDetermination of the long-time dynamics for the 2D Keller–Segel equation at critical mass. To appear

  13. [13]

    Buseghin, J

    F. Buseghin, J. D´ avila, M. del Pino, M. Musso,Existence of finite time blow-up in Keller-Segel system, Annals of PDE12(2026), Article 17

    2026

  14. [14]

    J. Campos SerranoMod` eles attractifs en astrophysique et biologie: points critiques et comportement en temps grand des solutionsPhD thesis, Th` ese de l’Universit´ e Paris Dauphine, 2012

    2012

  15. [15]

    J. F. Campos & J. DolbeaultA functional framework for the Keller-Segel system: logarithmic Hardy-LittlewoodSobolev and related spectral gap inequalitiesC. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris, 350 (2012), pp. 949–954

    2012

  16. [16]

    J. F. Campos and J. Dolbeault,Asymptotic Estimates for the Parabolic-Elliptic Keller–Segel Model in the Plane, Communications in Partial Differential Equations, Volume 39, Issue 5 (2014), Pages 806–841

    2014

  17. [17]

    E. A. Carlen,Stability for the logarithmic Hardy–Littlewood–Sobolev inequality with application to the Keller–Segel equation, J. Funct. Anal. 288 (2025), no. 6, 111081

    2025

  18. [18]

    Carlen & A

    E. Carlen & A. FigalliStability for a GNS inequality and the log-HLS inequality, with application to the critical mass Keller-Segel equationDuke Math. J., 162 (2013), pp. 579–625

    2013

  19. [19]

    Carlen & M

    E. Carlen & M. LossCompeting symmetries, the logarithmic HLS inequality and Onofri’s inequality onS n Geom. Funct. Anal., 2 (1992), pp. 90–104

    1992

  20. [20]

    Carrillo, S

    J.A. Carrillo, S. Hittmeir, B. Volzone & Y. YaoNonlinear aggregation–diffusion equations: radial symmetry and long time asymptotics, Inventiones mathematicae, Volume 218, pages 889–977 (2019)

    2019

  21. [21]

    P. H. Chavanis,Nonlinear mean field Fokker–Planck equations. Application to the chemotaxis of biological populations, The European Physical Journal B, Volume 62 (2008), Pages 179–208

    2008

  22. [22]

    P. H. Chavanis & C. SireVirial theorem and dynamical evolution of self-gravitating Brownian particles in an unbounded domain. I. Overdamped models, , Phys. Rev. E (3), 73 (2006), pp. 066103, 16

    2006

  23. [23]

    Childress and J

    S. Childress and J. K. Percus,Nonlinear aspects of chemotaxis, Mathematical Biosciences, Volume 56, Issues 3–4 (1981), Pages 217–237

    1981

  24. [24]

    Collot, C., Merle, F., & Rapha¨ el, P. (2017). Dynamics near the ground state for the energy critical nonlinear heat equation in large dimensions. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 352(1), 215-285

    2017

  25. [25]

    Collot, T.-E

    C. Collot, T.-E. Ghoul, N. Masmoudi, V. T. NguyenSpectral analysis for singularity formation of the two dimensional Keller-Segel systemAnn. PDE, 8 (2022), pp. Paper No. 5, 74

    2022

  26. [26]

    Collot, T.-E

    C. Collot, T.-E. Ghoul, N. Masmoudi, V. T. NguyenRefined Description and Stability for Singular Solutions of the 2D Keller-Segel SystemCommunications on Pure and Applied Mathematics / Volume 75, Issue 7 pp. 1419-1516

  27. [27]

    Collot, T.-E

    C. Collot, T.-E. Ghoul, N. Masmoudi, V. T. NguyenSingularity formed by the collision of two collapsing solitons in interaction for the 2D Keller-Segel systemarXiv:2409.05363

    work page arXiv

  28. [28]

    Collot, P

    C. Collot, P. Rapha¨ el, J. Szeftel,On the stability of type I blow up for the energy super critical heat equation, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc., 260 (2019), pp. v+97

    2019

  29. [29]

    Collot, K

    C. Collot, K. Zhang,On the stability of Type I self-similar blowups for the Keller-Segel system in three dimensions and higher, arXiv:2406.11358v2 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  30. [30]

    D´ avila, M

    J. D´ avila, M. del Pino, J. Dolbeault, M. Musso, J. WeiExistence and stability of infinite time blow-up in the Keller- Segel system, Arch Rational Mech Anal 248, 61 (2024)

    2024

  31. [31]

    del Pino & J

    M. del Pino & J. DolbeaultBest constants for Gagliardo-Nirenberg inequalities and applications to nonlinear diffusions Jour. Math. Pures Appl., 81: 301–342

  32. [32]

    Dolbeault and C

    J. Dolbeault and C. Schmeiser,The two-dimensional Keller–Segel model after blow-up, Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, Volume 25, Issue 1 (2009), Pages 109–121

    2009

  33. [33]

    J. I. Diaz, T. Nagai and J.-M. Rakotoson,Symmetrization Techniques on Unbounded Domains: Application to a Chemotaxis System onR N, Journal of Differential Equations, Volume 145, Issue 1 (1998), Pages 156–183

    1998

  34. [34]

    Ega˜ na Fern´ andez & S

    G. Ega˜ na Fern´ andez & S. MischlerUniqueness and long time asymptotic for the Keller-Segel equation: the parabolic- elliptic caseArch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 220 (2016), pp. 1159–1194

    2016

  35. [35]

    Elbar, A

    C. Elbar, A. Fern´ andez-Jim´ enez, F. Santambrogio,A Li–Yau and Aronson–B´ enilan approach for the Keller–Segel system with critical exponent, arXiv:2512.17772, (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  36. [36]

    Ghoul & N

    T-E. Ghoul & N. MasmoudiMinimal mass blowup solutions for the Patlak-Keller-Segel equation, Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics / Volume 71, Issue 10 pp. 1957-2015

    1957

  37. [37]

    M. A. Herrero & J. J. L. Vel´ azquezChemotactic collapse for the Keller-Segel modelJ. Math. Biol., 35 (1996), pp. 177–194

    1996

  38. [38]

    M. A. Herrero & J. J. L. Vel´ azquezSingularity patterns in a chemotaxis modelMath. Ann., 306 (1996), pp. 583–623

    1996

  39. [39]

    M. A. Herrero & J. J. L. Vel´ azquezA blow-up mechanism for a chemotaxis modelAnn. Scuola Norm. Sup. Pisa Cl. Sci. (4), 24 (1997), pp. 633–683 (1998)

    1997

  40. [40]

    Hillen and K

    T. Hillen and K. J. Painter,A user’s guide to PDE models for chemotaxis, Journal of Mathematical Biology, Volume 58 (2009), Pages 183–217

    2009

  41. [41]

    Horstmann,From 1970 Until Present: the Keller-Segel Model in Chemotaxis and Its Consequences, Nieders¨ achsische Staats- und Universit¨ atsbibliothek, 2003

    D. Horstmann,From 1970 Until Present: the Keller-Segel Model in Chemotaxis and Its Consequences, Nieders¨ achsische Staats- und Universit¨ atsbibliothek, 2003. 20 F. BUSEGHIN AND C. COLLOT

    1970

  42. [42]

    J¨ ager and S

    W. J¨ ager and S. Luckhaus,On Explosions of Solutions to a System of Partial Differential Equations Modelling Chemotaxis, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, Volume 329, No. 2 (1992), Pages 819–824

    1992

  43. [43]

    E. F. Keller and L. A. Segel,Model for chemotaxis, Journal of Theoretical Biology, Volume 30, Issue 2 (1971), Pages 225–234

    1971

  44. [44]

    P.-G. Lemari´ e–Rieusset,Small data in an optimal Banach space for the parabolic-parabolic and parabolic-elliptic Keller–Segel equations in the whole space, Advances in Differential Equations, Volume 18, Issues 11–12 (2013), Pages 1189–1208

    2013

  45. [45]

    L´ opez-G´ omez, T

    J. L´ opez-G´ omez, T. Nagai, T. Yamada,Non-trivialω-limit sets and oscillating solutions in a chemotaxis model in R2 with critical mass, J. Funct. Anal., 266 (2014), pp. 3455–3507

    2014

  46. [46]

    L´ opez-G´ omez, T

    J. L´ opez-G´ omez, T. Nagai and T. Yamada,The Basin of Attraction of the Steady-States for a Chemotaxis Model in R2 with Critical Mass, Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, Volume 207 (2013), Pages 159–184

    2013

  47. [47]

    L´ opez-G´ omez, T

    J. L´ opez-G´ omez, T. Nagai, T. YamadaNon-trivialω-limit sets and oscillating solutions in a chemotaxis model inR 2 with critical massJ. Funct. Anal., 266 (2014), pp. 3455–3507

    2014

  48. [48]

    Merle, F., Rapha¨ el, P., & Szeftel, J. (2013). The instability of Bourgain-Wang solutions for the L 2 critical NLS. American Journal of Mathematics, 135(4), 967-1017

    2013

  49. [49]

    Martel, Y., Merle, F., & Rapha¨ el, P. (2014). Blow up for the critical generalized Korteweg–de Vries equation. I: Dynamics near the soliton. Acta Mathematica, 212(1), 59-140

    2014

  50. [50]

    MizoguchiRefined asymptotic behavior of blowup solutions to a simplified chemotaxis systemComm

    N. MizoguchiRefined asymptotic behavior of blowup solutions to a simplified chemotaxis systemComm. Pure Appl. Math., 75 (2022), pp. 1870–1886

    2022

  51. [51]

    T. Nagai,Blowup of nonradial solutions to parabolic-elliptic systems modeling chemotaxis in two-dimensional domains, Journal of Inequalities and Applications, Volume 6, Issue 1 (2001), Pages 37–55

    2001

  52. [52]

    T. Nagai,Global existence and decay estimates of solutions to a parabolic-elliptic system of drift-diffusion type inR 2, Differential and Integral Equations, Volume 24, Issues 1–2 (2011), Pages 29–68

    2011

  53. [53]

    NagaiConvergence to self-similar solutions for a parabolic-elliptic system of drift-diffusion type inR 2, Adv

    T. NagaiConvergence to self-similar solutions for a parabolic-elliptic system of drift-diffusion type inR 2, Adv. Differential Equations, 16 (2011), pp. 839–866

    2011

  54. [54]

    Nagai and T

    T. Nagai and T. Senba,Behavior of radially symmetric solutions of a system related to chemotaxis, Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications, Volume 30, Issue 6 (1997), Pages 3837–3842

    1997

  55. [55]

    Naito, T

    Y. Naito, T. Senba,Bounded and unbounded oscillating solutions to a parabolic-elliptic system in two dimensional space, Commun. Pure Appl. Anal., 12 (2013), pp. 1861–1880

    2013

  56. [56]

    Naito, T

    Y. Naito, T. Suzuki,Self-similarity in Chemotaxis Systems, Colloq. Math., 111 (2008), no. 1, pp. 11–34

    2008

  57. [57]

    OttoThe geometry of dissipative evolution equations: the porous medium equationCommunications in Partial Differential Equations Volume 26, (2001) - Issue 1-2

    F. OttoThe geometry of dissipative evolution equations: the porous medium equationCommunications in Partial Differential Equations Volume 26, (2001) - Issue 1-2

    2001

  58. [58]

    C. S. Patlak,Random walk with persistence and external bias, Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, Volume 15, Pages 311–338

  59. [59]

    Rapha¨ el and R

    P. Rapha¨ el and R. SchweyerOn the stability of critical chemotactic aggregationMath. Ann., 359 (2014), pp. 267–377

    2014

  60. [60]

    Y. Seki, Y. Sugiyama, J. J. L. Vel´ azquezMultiple peak aggregations for the Keller–Segel systemNonlinearity 26 319

  61. [61]

    T. Senba,Type II blowup of solutions to a simplified Keller–Segel system in two dimensional domains, Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications, Volume 66, Issue 8 (2007), Pages 1817–1839

    2007

  62. [62]

    Senba and T

    T. Senba and T. Suzuki,Weak Solutions to a Parabolic-Elliptic System of Chemotaxis, Journal of Functional Analysis, Volume 191, Issue 1 (2002), Pages 17–51

    2002

  63. [63]

    Senba & T

    T. Senba & T. SusuzkiTime global solutions to a parabolic-elliptic system modelling chemotaxis, Asymptotic Analysis 32 (2002) 63–89

    2002

  64. [64]

    SuzukiMethods of Geometry in the Theory of Partial Differential Equations: Principle of the Cancellation of Singularities.World Scientific (2024)

    T. SuzukiMethods of Geometry in the Theory of Partial Differential Equations: Principle of the Cancellation of Singularities.World Scientific (2024)

    2024

  65. [65]

    J. J. L. Vel´ azquezStability of some mechanisms of chemotactic aggregationSIAM J. Appl. Math., 62 (2002), pp. 1581–1633

    2002

  66. [66]

    WeiGlobal well-posedness and blow-up for the 2-D Patlak–Keller–Segel equation, Journal of Functional Analysis Volume 274, Issue 2, Pages 388-401

    D. WeiGlobal well-posedness and blow-up for the 2-D Patlak–Keller–Segel equation, Journal of Functional Analysis Volume 274, Issue 2, Pages 388-401

  67. [67]

    Weissler, F. B. (1979). Semilinear evolution equations in Banach spaces. Journal of Functional Analysis, 32(3), 277-296

    1979

  68. [68]

    Weissler, F. B. (1980). Local existence and nonexistence for semilinear parabolic equations in L p. Indiana University Mathematics Journal, 29(1), 79-102. F. Buseghin: CY Cergy Paris University. Laboratoire AGM, 2 avenue Adolphe Chauvin 95302 Cergy- Pontoise Email address:federico.buseghin@cyu.fr C. Collot: CY Cergy Paris University. Laboratoire AGM, 2 av...

    1980