pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.21785 · v2 · pith:5UOIXBYWnew · submitted 2026-06-19 · 🧬 q-bio.NC

Mostly-monocular responses and other visual functions in a multiscale network model of Macaque V1

Zhuo-Cheng Xiao , Kevin K. Lin , Lai-Sang Young This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 12:19 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧬 q-bio.NC
keywords ocular dominance columnsbinocular integrationV1multiscale modelmacaquemonocular responseslayer 4Cαfeedback
0
0 comments X

The pith

In a multiscale model of macaque V1, narrow binocular strips emerge along ocular dominance column borders when 10-30% of interactions near boundaries are cross-columnar, and layer 6 feedback is largely monocular.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper uses a multiscale computational model to study how signals from the two eyes start to integrate in layer 4Cα of macaque V1. It shows that narrow binocular strips form along the borders of ocular dominance columns, aligning with experimental data. This pattern is most consistent with observations when 10-30% of interactions near the borders cross between columns. The model also indicates that feedback from layer 6 is largely monocular. These findings demonstrate that multiscale modeling can efficiently connect neuroanatomy to visual function.

Core claim

Using a multiscale network model of macaque V1, narrow binocular strips emerge along the borders of ocular dominance columns in layer 4Cα, consistent with experiments particularly when 10-30% of interactions near ODC boundaries are cross-columnar, and feedback from layer 6 is largely monocular, allowing inference of the neuroanatomical origins of binocular response.

What carries the argument

The multiscale network model approximating detailed V1 circuitry to test hypotheses on ocular dominance and binocularity in layer 4Cα.

If this is right

  • Narrow binocular strips form along ocular dominance column borders.
  • 10-30% cross-columnar interactions near boundaries best match experimental data.
  • Feedback from layer 6 remains largely monocular.
  • Multiscale modeling can bridge anatomy and function in V1.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The border effect may generalize to other types of cortical columns or sensory modalities.
  • Varying the interaction fraction in the model could predict how wiring changes affect binocularity.
  • The approach might be used to study gradual integration in higher visual areas.

Load-bearing premise

The multiscale approximation and the 10-30% cross-columnar interaction fraction near ODC boundaries are sufficient to capture the dominant anatomical drivers of binocularity without missing critical unmodeled factors.

What would settle it

Direct measurements in macaque V1 showing either no narrow binocular strips along ODC borders or a cross-columnar interaction fraction near boundaries outside the 10-30% range would falsify the model's main results.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.21785 by Kevin K. Lin, Lai-Sang Young, Zhuo-Cheng Xiao.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Model layout. A. Schematic of Layer 4Cα (L4) with feedforward input from LGN and feedback from Layer 6. Note as explained in the text, we defer treatment of ODCs until later (see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Orientation selectivity: tuning curves and activity maps. A. Example tuning curves for two local populations in the model described in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Two other V1 properties. A. Contrast response: firing rates as function of contrast are plotted for the same two local populations as in Fig. 2A (◦: Population 1, +: Population 2); “0% contrast” = background. B. Activity maps in response to the vertical grating at several different contrasts. C. Firing rates as functions of the grating’s temporal frequency (◦: Population 1, +: Population 2). contrast and s… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Two-parameter family of computational models with ocular dominance columns (ODCs). A. Schematic of a model with 8×4 HCs; alternate rows correspond to ODCs receiving input from the left (L) and right (R) eyes. B. The three crossing rules, depicting how a connection from a cell in population p to a cell in population q that potentially crosses ODC boundaries may be modified (if it is present according to pre… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Example tuning curves under monocular and binocular stimulations. Three tuning curves are shown for each of 6 local populations (Pops. a-f) for various values of P(Crs). Locations of the local populations are indicated in the top panel, which shows the same 4 HCs in the red square in Fig. 4A. The 3 tuning curves correspond to monocular stimulation of the home column of the pixel (red), binocular stimulatio… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Emergence of binocular strips. Binocular indices are depicted in color code for one hypercolumn, under a range of crossing rules. Color bar shows BI as defined in the main text: BI= 0 means the local population is purely monocular; BI= 1/2 means it is fully binocular. Observe the emergence of binocular strips, as well as the fact that cells in orientation domains away from ODC borders (here horizonal and v… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Comparison of monocular and binocular responses. Binocular modulation (top row, see text for definition) and histograms of ¯m/¯b, the ratio of firing rates when monocularly and binocularly stimulated (bottom row) are shown, with red squares identifying regions where ¯b and m¯ are within 15% of one another. where ¯m is as above and ¯b is the firing rate of a local population above background when a single g… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Biologically plausible ranges of L6 feedback binocularity. Activity maps are shown for various levels of binocularity in L6 feedback to L4. Here the setup is as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Visual signals from the two eyes merge gradually as they pass through the primary visual cortex (V1). Here we use a computational model of Macaque V1 to study the first stage of this integration along the magnocellular pathway, in layer 4C$\alpha$, aiming to infer neuroanatomical origins of binocular response. It is known that neurons in layer 4C$\alpha$ are predominantly monocular, though some do exhibit varying degrees of binocularity. We find (1) the emergence of narrow binocular strips along borders of ocular dominance columns (ODC), a finding that aligns with experiments; (2) most consistent with data is when $10-30\%$ of interactions near ODC boundaries are cross-columnar; and (3) feedback from layer 6 is largely monocular. These results were obtained through systematic hypothesis testing using a multiscale model that is orders of magnitude faster than its biologically-detailed predecessors. We propose that multiscale modeling can be an effective tool for bridging anatomy and function.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a multiscale network model of Macaque V1 layer 4Cα to study the first stage of binocular integration along the magnocellular pathway. It reports three main findings obtained via systematic hypothesis testing: (1) emergence of narrow binocular strips along ocular dominance column (ODC) borders that align with experiments; (2) best consistency with data when 10-30% of interactions near ODC boundaries are cross-columnar; and (3) largely monocular feedback from layer 6. The model is described as orders of magnitude faster than detailed predecessors.

Significance. If the multiscale approximation is shown to faithfully capture local connectivity near ODC borders, the work offers an efficient computational tool for linking neuroanatomy to visual function and for systematic exploration of parameter regimes in V1 models. The emphasis on hypothesis testing and the identification of a narrow range of cross-columnar interactions provide a concrete, falsifiable link between anatomy and the observed mostly-monocular responses.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract (model description) and hypothesis-testing results] The central claims on binocular-strip emergence and the 10-30% cross-columnar fraction rest on the multiscale approximation's ability to represent local border interactions without altering effective cross-eye synaptic drive; no control recomputation of the same observables in a non-multiscale or finer-scale limit is reported, leaving open whether the strips and percentage range are robust or artifacts of coarse-graining.
  2. [Abstract and results on cross-columnar interactions] The 10-30% range is stated as 'most consistent with data,' yet the manuscript provides no explicit statement on whether this interval was pre-specified before running the simulations or selected after inspecting model outputs; this directly affects the strength of the claim that the model aligns with experimental binocularity patterns.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract refers to 'systematic hypothesis testing' and 'alternative parameter regimes' but the provided text does not detail the full exploration of error bars or the precise definition of the observables used to score consistency with data.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments on our manuscript. We address the major comments point by point below, and will incorporate clarifications in the revised version where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract (model description) and hypothesis-testing results] The central claims on binocular-strip emergence and the 10-30% cross-columnar fraction rest on the multiscale approximation's ability to represent local border interactions without altering effective cross-eye synaptic drive; no control recomputation of the same observables in a non-multiscale or finer-scale limit is reported, leaving open whether the strips and percentage range are robust or artifacts of coarse-graining.

    Authors: The multiscale approximation is designed to faithfully represent local connectivity near ODC borders by scaling interactions appropriately, thereby preserving the effective cross-eye synaptic drive. We did not include a non-multiscale control because the detailed model is computationally infeasible for the systematic parameter exploration performed here. However, we will add a new subsection in the methods or discussion to elaborate on the theoretical justification for the approximation and why it is unlikely to introduce artifacts in the reported observables. This addresses the concern without requiring infeasible recomputations. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract and results on cross-columnar interactions] The 10-30% range is stated as 'most consistent with data,' yet the manuscript provides no explicit statement on whether this interval was pre-specified before running the simulations or selected after inspecting model outputs; this directly affects the strength of the claim that the model aligns with experimental binocularity patterns.

    Authors: We agree that transparency regarding the determination of the 10-30% range is important. This range was identified through systematic hypothesis testing by varying the cross-columnar interaction percentage and comparing the resulting response patterns to experimental data. It was not pre-specified but emerged from the exploration. In the revised manuscript, we will explicitly state in the results section how the range was determined and note that it is the outcome of the hypothesis-testing procedure rather than an a priori prediction. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Cross-columnar interaction fraction tuned to match binocular data; emergence claim otherwise anatomy-driven

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Abstract]
    "most consistent with data is when 10-30% of interactions near ODC boundaries are cross-columnar"

    The model systematically varies the cross-columnar interaction fraction near ODC boundaries and reports the 10-30% interval as the range most consistent with experimental binocular-response data; the reported interval is therefore the direct output of the fitting procedure rather than an independent derivation from first-principles connectivity.

full rationale

The paper's central outputs are (1) emergence of narrow binocular strips at ODC borders as a model consequence of anatomical connectivity rules and (2) identification of the 10-30% cross-columnar fraction near boundaries as most consistent with data. The second is obtained by systematic variation of that fraction inside the multiscale model and direct comparison to experimental binocularity measurements; this is a fitted-input step rather than an a-priori prediction. No self-citation chain, uniqueness theorem, or ansatz smuggling is visible in the provided text that would render the strip-emergence result tautological. The multiscale approximation is presented as a computational tool whose validity is assumed rather than re-derived here. The derivation therefore retains independent anatomical content but carries moderate circularity burden on the quantitative percentage claim.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that the multiscale reduction preserves the essential connectivity statistics near ODC borders and that the chosen interaction percentage is the dominant free parameter; no new entities are postulated.

free parameters (1)
  • fraction of cross-columnar interactions near ODC boundaries
    Value in the 10-30% range selected because it produces binocular response patterns most consistent with experimental data.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The multiscale network reduction accurately represents the dominant local connectivity rules in layer 4Cα.
    Invoked to justify using the simplified model instead of a fully detailed biophysical simulation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5721 in / 1266 out tokens · 18775 ms · 2026-06-26T12:19:37.802642+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references

  1. [1]

    Theoretical neuroscience rising.Neuron, 60(3):489–495, 2008

    Larry F Abbott. Theoretical neuroscience rising.Neuron, 60(3):489–495, 2008

    2008

  2. [2]

    Theory and simulation in neuro- science.Science, 338(6103):60–65, 2012

    Wulfram Gerstner, Henning Sprekeler, and Gustavo Deco. Theory and simulation in neuro- science.Science, 338(6103):60–65, 2012. 19

    2012

  3. [3]

    Computational neuroscience: beyond the local circuit.Current opinion in neurobiology, 25:xiii–xviii, 2014

    Haim Sompolinsky. Computational neuroscience: beyond the local circuit.Current opinion in neurobiology, 25:xiii–xviii, 2014

    2014

  4. [4]

    The scientific case for brain simulations.Neuron, 102(4):735–744, 2019

    Gaute T Einevoll, Alain Destexhe, Markus Diesmann, Sonja Gr¨ un, Viktor Jirsa, Marc de Kamps, Michele Migliore, Torbjørn V Ness, Hans E Plesser, and Felix Sch¨ urmann. The scientific case for brain simulations.Neuron, 102(4):735–744, 2019

    2019

  5. [5]

    Modeling single-neuron dynamics and computations: a balance of detail and abstraction.Science, 314(5796):80–85, 2006

    Andreas VM Herz, Tim Gollisch, Christian K Machens, and Dieter Jaeger. Modeling single-neuron dynamics and computations: a balance of detail and abstraction.Science, 314(5796):80–85, 2006

    2006

  6. [6]

    On the nature and use of models in network neuroscience.Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 19(9):566–578, 2018

    Danielle S Bassett, Perry Zurn, and Joshua I Gold. On the nature and use of models in network neuroscience.Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 19(9):566–578, 2018

    2018

  7. [7]

    The cell-type specific cortical microcircuit: relating structure and activity in a full-scale spiking network model.Cerebral cortex, 24(3):785–806, 2014

    Tobias C Potjans and Markus Diesmann. The cell-type specific cortical microcircuit: relating structure and activity in a full-scale spiking network model.Cerebral cortex, 24(3):785–806, 2014

    2014

  8. [8]

    Using goal-driven deep learning models to understand sensory cortex.Nature neuroscience, 19(3):356–365, 2016

    Daniel LK Yamins and James J DiCarlo. Using goal-driven deep learning models to understand sensory cortex.Nature neuroscience, 19(3):356–365, 2016

    2016

  9. [9]

    Systematic integration of structural and functional data into multi-scale models of mouse primary visual cortex.Neuron, 106(3):388–403, 2020

    Yazan N Billeh, Binghuang Cai, Sergey L Gratiy, Kael Dai, Ramakrishnan Iyer, Nathan W Gouwens, Reza Abbasi-Asl, Xiaoxuan Jia, Joshua H Siegle, Shawn R Olsen, et al. Systematic integration of structural and functional data into multi-scale models of mouse primary visual cortex.Neuron, 106(3):388–403, 2020

    2020

  10. [10]

    Combining hypothesis-and data-driven neuroscience modeling in fair work- flows.Elife, 11:e69013, 2022

    Olivia Eriksson, Upinder Singh Bhalla, Kim T Blackwell, Sharon M Crook, Daniel Keller, Andrei Kramer, Marja-Leena Linne, Ausra Saudargien˙ e, Rebecca C Wade, and Jeanette Hell- gren Kotaleski. Combining hypothesis-and data-driven neuroscience modeling in fair work- flows.Elife, 11:e69013, 2022

    2022

  11. [11]

    A data-based large-scale model for pri- mary visual cortex enables brain-like robust and versatile visual processing.Science Advances, 8(44):eabq7592, 2022

    Guozhang Chen, Franz Scherr, and Wolfgang Maass. A data-based large-scale model for pri- mary visual cortex enables brain-like robust and versatile visual processing.Science Advances, 8(44):eabq7592, 2022

    2022

  12. [12]

    Large-scale mechanistic models of brain circuits with biophysically and morphologically detailed neurons.Journal of Neuroscience, 44(40), 2024

    Salvador Dura-Bernal, Beatriz Herrera, Carmen Lupascu, Brianna M Marsh, Daniela Gandolfi, Addolorata Marasco, Samuel Neymotin, Armando Romani, Sergio Solinas, Maxim Bazhenov, et al. Large-scale mechanistic models of brain circuits with biophysically and morphologically detailed neurons.Journal of Neuroscience, 44(40), 2024

    2024

  13. [13]

    Mapping effective connectivity by virtually perturbing a surrogate brain.Nature Methods, 22(6):1376–1385, 2025

    Zixiang Luo, Kaining Peng, Zhichao Liang, Shengyuan Cai, Chenyu Xu, Dan Li, Yu Hu, Changsong Zhou, and Quanying Liu. Mapping effective connectivity by virtually perturbing a surrogate brain.Nature Methods, 22(6):1376–1385, 2025

    2025

  14. [14]

    Reconstruction and simulation of neocortical microcircuitry.Cell, 163(2):456– 492, 2015

    Henry Markram, Eilif Muller, Srikanth Ramaswamy, Michael W Reimann, Marwan Abdellah, Carlos Aguado Sanchez, Anastasia Ailamaki, Lidia Alonso-Nanclares, Nicolas Antille, Selim Arsever, et al. Reconstruction and simulation of neocortical microcircuitry.Cell, 163(2):456– 492, 2015

    2015

  15. [15]

    Efficient models of cortical activity via local dynamic equilibria and coarse-grained interactions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 121(27):e2320454121, 2024

    Zhuo-Cheng Xiao, Kevin K Lin, and Lai-Sang Young. Efficient models of cortical activity via local dynamic equilibria and coarse-grained interactions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 121(27):e2320454121, 2024. 20

    2024

  16. [16]

    Neuroimaging weighs in: humans meet macaques in “primate” visual cortex.Journal of Neuroscience, 23(10):3981–3989, 2003

    Roger BH Tootell, Doris Tsao, and Wim Vanduffel. Neuroimaging weighs in: humans meet macaques in “primate” visual cortex.Journal of Neuroscience, 23(10):3981–3989, 2003

    2003

  17. [17]

    Comparative mapping of higher visual areas in monkeys and humans.Trends in cognitive sciences, 8(7):315–324, 2004

    Guy A Orban, David Van Essen, and Wim Vanduffel. Comparative mapping of higher visual areas in monkeys and humans.Trends in cognitive sciences, 8(7):315–324, 2004

    2004

  18. [18]

    Parallel colour-opponent pathways to primary visual cortex.Nature, 426(6967):668–671, 2003

    Soumya Chatterjee and Edward M Callaway. Parallel colour-opponent pathways to primary visual cortex.Nature, 426(6967):668–671, 2003

    2003

  19. [19]

    Parallel processing strategies of the primate visual system.Nature reviews neuroscience, 10(5):360–372, 2009

    Jonathan J Nassi and Edward M Callaway. Parallel processing strategies of the primate visual system.Nature reviews neuroscience, 10(5):360–372, 2009

    2009

  20. [20]

    Orientation selectivity from very sparse lgn inputs in a comprehensive model of macaque v1 cortex.Journal of Neuroscience, 36(49):12368–12384, 2016

    Logan Chariker, Robert Shapley, and Lai-Sang Young. Orientation selectivity from very sparse lgn inputs in a comprehensive model of macaque v1 cortex.Journal of Neuroscience, 36(49):12368–12384, 2016

    2016

  21. [21]

    Contrast response in a comprehensive network model of macaque v1.Journal of vision, 20(4):16–16, 2020

    Logan Chariker, Robert Shapley, and Lai-Sang Young. Contrast response in a comprehensive network model of macaque v1.Journal of vision, 20(4):16–16, 2020

    2020

  22. [22]

    A computational model of direction selectivity in macaque v1 cortex based on dynamic differences between on and off pathways.Journal of Neuroscience, 42(16):3365–3380, 2022

    Logan Chariker, Robert Shapley, Michael Hawken, and Lai-Sang Young. A computational model of direction selectivity in macaque v1 cortex based on dynamic differences between on and off pathways.Journal of Neuroscience, 42(16):3365–3380, 2022

    2022

  23. [23]

    Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex.The Journal of physiology, 195(1):215–243, 1968

    David H Hubel and Torsten N Wiesel. Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex.The Journal of physiology, 195(1):215–243, 1968

    1968

  24. [24]

    Orientation selectivity in macaque v1: diversity and laminar dependence.Journal of neuroscience, 22(13):5639–5651, 2002

    Dario L Ringach, Robert M Shapley, and Michael J Hawken. Orientation selectivity in macaque v1: diversity and laminar dependence.Journal of neuroscience, 22(13):5639–5651, 2002

    2002

  25. [25]

    Area v1.Scholarpedia, 7(7):12105, 2012

    Matteo Carandini. Area v1.Scholarpedia, 7(7):12105, 2012

    2012

  26. [26]

    Mechanisms of neuronal computation in mammalian visual cortex.Neuron, 75(2):194–208, 2012

    Nicholas J Priebe and David Ferster. Mechanisms of neuronal computation in mammalian visual cortex.Neuron, 75(2):194–208, 2012

    2012

  27. [27]

    Functional anatomy of macaque striate cortex

    Roger BH Tootell, Steven L Hamilton, Michael S Silverman, and Eugene Switkes. Functional anatomy of macaque striate cortex. I. ocular dominance, binocular interactions, and baseline conditions.Journal of Neuroscience, 8(5):1500–1530, 1988

    1988

  28. [28]

    Ocular dominance columns: enigmas and challenges

    Daniel L Adams and Jonathan C Horton. Ocular dominance columns: enigmas and challenges. The Neuroscientist, 15(1):62–77, 2009

    2009

  29. [29]

    Contrast sensitivity and orientation selectivity in lamina iv of the striate cortex of old world monkeys.Experimental Brain Research, 54(2):367–372, 1984

    MJ Hawken and AJ Parker. Contrast sensitivity and orientation selectivity in lamina iv of the striate cortex of old world monkeys.Experimental Brain Research, 54(2):367–372, 1984

    1984

  30. [30]

    Local circuits and ocular domi- nance columns in monkey striate cortex.Journal of Neuroscience, 9(4):1389–1399, 1989

    Lawrence C Katz, Charles D Gilbert, and Torsten N Wiesel. Local circuits and ocular domi- nance columns in monkey striate cortex.Journal of Neuroscience, 9(4):1389–1399, 1989

    1989

  31. [31]

    Alessandra Angelucci and Paul C Bressloff. Contribution of feedforward, lateral and feedback connections to the classical receptive field center and extra-classical receptive field surround of primate v1 neurons.Progress in brain research, 154:93–120, 2006

    2006

  32. [32]

    Binocular modulation of monocular v1 neurons.Current Biology, 29(3):381–391, 2019

    Kacie Dougherty, Michele A Cox, Jacob A Westerberg, and Alexander Maier. Binocular modulation of monocular v1 neurons.Current Biology, 29(3):381–391, 2019. 21

    2019

  33. [33]

    Binocular integration in the primate primary visual cortex.Annual Review of Vision Science, 8(1):345–360, 2022

    A Maier, MA Cox, JA Westerberg, and K Dougherty. Binocular integration in the primate primary visual cortex.Annual Review of Vision Science, 8(1):345–360, 2022

    2022

  34. [34]

    Contributions of individual layer 6 pyramidal neurons to local circuitry in macaque primary visual cortex.Journal of neuroscience, 16(8):2724–2739, 1996

    Anne K Wiser and Edward M Callaway. Contributions of individual layer 6 pyramidal neurons to local circuitry in macaque primary visual cortex.Journal of neuroscience, 16(8):2724–2739, 1996

    1996

  35. [35]

    The circuitry of v1 and v2: integration of color, form, and motion.Annu

    Lawrence C Sincich and Jonathan C Horton. The circuitry of v1 and v2: integration of color, form, and motion.Annu. Rev. Neurosci., 28(1):303–326, 2005

    2005

  36. [36]

    Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat’s visual cortex.The Journal of physiology, 160(1):106, 1962

    David H Hubel and Torsten N Wiesel. Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat’s visual cortex.The Journal of physiology, 160(1):106, 1962

    1962

  37. [37]

    Orientation selectivity, preference, and continuity in monkey striate cortex

    Gary G Blasdel. Orientation selectivity, preference, and continuity in monkey striate cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 12(8):3139–3161, 1992

    1992

  38. [38]

    Geometry of orientation and ocular dominance columns in monkey striate cortex.Journal of Neuroscience, 13(10):4114–4129, 1993

    Klaus Obermayer and Gary G Blasdel. Geometry of orientation and ocular dominance columns in monkey striate cortex.Journal of Neuroscience, 13(10):4114–4129, 1993

    1993

  39. [39]

    Anatomical substrates for functional columns in macaque monkey primary visual cortex.Cerebral cortex, 13(1):15–24, 2003

    Jennifer S Lund, Alessandra Angelucci, and Paul C Bressloff. Anatomical substrates for functional columns in macaque monkey primary visual cortex.Cerebral cortex, 13(1):15–24, 2003

    2003

  40. [40]

    Local circuits in primary visual cortex of the macaque monkey.Annual review of neuroscience, 21(1):47–74, 1998

    Edward M Callaway. Local circuits in primary visual cortex of the macaque monkey.Annual review of neuroscience, 21(1):47–74, 1998

    1998

  41. [41]

    Orientation selectivity of thalamic input to simple cells of cat visual cortex.Nature, 380(6571):249–252, 1996

    David Ferster, Sooyoung Chung, and Heidi Wheat. Orientation selectivity of thalamic input to simple cells of cat visual cortex.Nature, 380(6571):249–252, 1996

    1996

  42. [42]

    Harvey A Swadlow. Efferent neurons and suspected interneurons in binocular visual cortex of the awake rabbit: receptive fields and binocular properties.Journal of neurophysiology, 59(4):1162–1187, 1988

    1988

  43. [43]

    Stimulus feature selectivity in excita- tory and inhibitory neurons in primary visual cortex.Journal of Neuroscience, 27(39):10333– 10344, 2007

    Jessica A Cardin, Larry A Palmer, and Diego Contreras. Stimulus feature selectivity in excita- tory and inhibitory neurons in primary visual cortex.Journal of Neuroscience, 27(39):10333– 10344, 2007

    2007

  44. [44]

    Striate cortex of monkey and cat: contrast response function.Journal of neurophysiology, 48(1):217–237, 1982

    Duane G Albrecht and David B Hamilton. Striate cortex of monkey and cat: contrast response function.Journal of neurophysiology, 48(1):217–237, 1982

    1982

  45. [45]

    Functional characterization of the extraclassical receptive field in macaque v1: con- trast, orientation, and temporal dynamics.Journal of Neuroscience, 33(14):6230–6242, 2013

    Christopher A Henry, Siddhartha Joshi, Dajun Xing, Robert M Shapley, and Michael J Hawken. Functional characterization of the extraclassical receptive field in macaque v1: con- trast, orientation, and temporal dynamics.Journal of Neuroscience, 33(14):6230–6242, 2013

    2013

  46. [46]

    Recurrent excitation in neocortical circuits.Science, 269(5226):981–985, 1995

    Rodney J Douglas, Christof Koch, Misha Mahowald, Kevan AC Martin, and Humbert H Suarez. Recurrent excitation in neocortical circuits.Science, 269(5226):981–985, 1995

    1995

  47. [47]

    Contrast invariance of functional maps in cat primary visual cortex.Journal of vision, 4(3):1–1, 2004

    Matteo Carandini and Frank Sengpiel. Contrast invariance of functional maps in cat primary visual cortex.Journal of vision, 4(3):1–1, 2004

    2004

  48. [48]

    Temporal-frequency selectivity in monkey visual cortex.Visual neuroscience, 13(3):477–492, 1996

    MJ Hawken, Robert M Shapley, and DH Grosof. Temporal-frequency selectivity in monkey visual cortex.Visual neuroscience, 13(3):477–492, 1996. 22

    1996

  49. [49]

    Michael Connolly and David Van Essen. The representation of the visual field in parvicellular and magnocellular layers of the lateral geniculate nucleus in the macaque monkey.Journal of Comparative Neurology, 226(4):544–564, 1984

    1984

  50. [50]

    Structure and function of parallel pathways in the primate early visual system.The Journal of physiology, 566(1):13–19, 2005

    Edward M Callaway. Structure and function of parallel pathways in the primate early visual system.The Journal of physiology, 566(1):13–19, 2005

    2005

  51. [51]

    Jonathan C Horton and Davina R Hocking. Monocular core zones and binocular border strips in primate striate cortex revealed by the contrasting effects of enucleation, eyelid suture, and retinal laser lesions on cytochrome oxidase activity.Journal of Neuroscience, 18(14):5433–5455, 1998

    1998

  52. [52]

    Temporal dynamics of binocular integration in primary visual cortex.Journal of vision, 19(12):13–13, 2019

    Michele A Cox, Kacie Dougherty, Jacob A Westerberg, Michelle S Schall, and Alexander Maier. Temporal dynamics of binocular integration in primary visual cortex.Journal of vision, 19(12):13–13, 2019

    2019

  53. [53]

    Ocular dominance columns and local projections of layer 6 pyramidal neurons in macaque primary visual cortex.Visual neuroscience, 14(2):241– 251, 1997

    Anne K Wiser and Edward M Callaway. Ocular dominance columns and local projections of layer 6 pyramidal neurons in macaque primary visual cortex.Visual neuroscience, 14(2):241– 251, 1997

    1997

  54. [54]

    The development of ocular domi- nance columns in normal and visually deprived monkeys.Journal of Comparative Neurology, 191(1):1–51, 1980

    Simon Le Vay, Torsten N Wiesel, and David H Hubel. The development of ocular domi- nance columns in normal and visually deprived monkeys.Journal of Comparative Neurology, 191(1):1–51, 1980

    1980

  55. [55]

    Ocular dominance and disparity coding in cat visual cortex

    Simon LeVay and Thomas Voigt. Ocular dominance and disparity coding in cat visual cortex. Visual neuroscience, 1(4):395–414, 1988

    1988

  56. [56]

    Stimulating both eyes with matching stimuli enhances v1 responses.Iscience, 25(5), 2022

    Blake A Mitchell, Kacie Dougherty, Jacob A Westerberg, Brock M Carlson, Lo¨ ıc Daumail, Alexander Maier, and Michele A Cox. Stimulating both eyes with matching stimuli enhances v1 responses.Iscience, 25(5), 2022

    2022

  57. [57]

    Organizing principles of cortical layer 6.Frontiers in neural circuits, 4:750, 2010

    Farran Briggs. Organizing principles of cortical layer 6.Frontiers in neural circuits, 4:750, 2010

    2010

  58. [58]

    Neocortical layer 6, a review.Frontiers in neuroanatomy, 4:1339, 2010

    Alex M Thomson. Neocortical layer 6, a review.Frontiers in neuroanatomy, 4:1339, 2010

    2010

  59. [59]

    Quantitative studies of single-cell properties in monkey striate cortex

    Peter H Schiller, Barbara L Finlay, and Susan F Volman. Quantitative studies of single-cell properties in monkey striate cortex. ii. orientation specificity and ocular dominance.Journal of neurophysiology, 39(6):1320–1333, 1976

    1976

  60. [60]

    David McLaughlin, Robert Shapley, Michael Shelley, and Dingeman J Wielaard. A neuronal network model of macaque primary visual cortex (v1): Orientation selectivity and dynamics in the input layer 4ca.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97(14):8087–8092, 2000

    2000

  61. [61]

    Large-scale modeling of the primary visual cortex: influence of cortical architecture upon neuronal response.Journal of Physiology- Paris, 97(2-3):237–252, 2003

    David McLaughlin, Robert Shapley, and Michael Shelley. Large-scale modeling of the primary visual cortex: influence of cortical architecture upon neuronal response.Journal of Physiology- Paris, 97(2-3):237–252, 2003

    2003

  62. [62]

    An egalitarian network model for the emergence of simple and complex cells in visual cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101(1):366–371, 2004

    Louis Tao, Michael Shelley, David McLaughlin, and Robert Shapley. An egalitarian network model for the emergence of simple and complex cells in visual cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101(1):366–371, 2004. 23

    2004

  63. [63]

    Heterogeneous multiscale method: a general methodology for multiscale modeling.Physical Review B, 67(9):092101, 2003

    E Weinan, Bjorn Engquist, and Zhongyi Huang. Heterogeneous multiscale method: a general methodology for multiscale modeling.Physical Review B, 67(9):092101, 2003

    2003

  64. [64]

    Equation-free, coarse-grained multiscale computa- tion: enabling microscopic simulators to perform system-level analysis.Commun

    Ioannis G Kevrekidis, C William Gear, James M Hyman, Panagiotis G Kevrekidis, Olof Run- borg, Constantinos Theodoropoulos, et al. Equation-free, coarse-grained multiscale computa- tion: enabling microscopic simulators to perform system-level analysis.Commun. Math. Sci, 1(4):715–762, 2003

    2003

  65. [65]

    The heterogeneous multiscale method.Acta Numerica, 21:1–87, 2012

    Assyr Abdulle, E Weinan, Bj¨ orn Engquist, and Eric Vanden-Eijnden. The heterogeneous multiscale method.Acta Numerica, 21:1–87, 2012

    2012

  66. [66]

    Netpyne, a tool for data-driven multiscale modeling of brain circuits.Elife, 8:e44494, 2019

    Salvador Dura-Bernal, Benjamin A Suter, Padraig Gleeson, Matteo Cantarelli, Adrian Quin- tana, Facundo Rodriguez, David J Kedziora, George L Chadderdon, Cliff C Kerr, Samuel A Neymotin, et al. Netpyne, a tool for data-driven multiscale modeling of brain circuits.Elife, 8:e44494, 2019

    2019

  67. [67]

    Colloquium: Multiscale modeling of brain network organization.Reviews of Modern Physics, 94(3):031002, 2022

    Charley Presigny and Fabrizio De Vico Fallani. Colloquium: Multiscale modeling of brain network organization.Reviews of Modern Physics, 94(3):031002, 2022

    2022

  68. [68]

    The quest for multiscale brain modeling.Trends in neuro- sciences, 45(10):777–790, 2022

    Egidio D’Angelo and Viktor Jirsa. The quest for multiscale brain modeling.Trends in neuro- sciences, 45(10):777–790, 2022

    2022

  69. [69]

    Descriptive multiscale modeling in data-driven neuroscience.Synthese, 200(2):129, 2022

    Philipp Haueis. Descriptive multiscale modeling in data-driven neuroscience.Synthese, 200(2):129, 2022

    2022

  70. [70]

    Anatomy of hierarchy: feedforward and feedback pathways in macaque visual cortex.Journal of compara- tive neurology, 522(1):225–259, 2014

    Nikola T Markov, Julien Vezoli, Pascal Chameau, Arnaud Falchier, Ren´ e Quilodran, Cyril Huissoud, Camille Lamy, Pierre Misery, Pascale Giroud, Shimon Ullman, et al. Anatomy of hierarchy: feedforward and feedback pathways in macaque visual cortex.Journal of compara- tive neurology, 522(1):225–259, 2014

    2014

  71. [71]

    The effects of contrast on visual orientation and spatial frequency discrimination: a comparison of single cells and behavior.Journal of neurophysiology, 57(3):773–786, 1987

    Bernt C Skottun, Arthur Bradley, Gary Sclar, Izumi Ohzawa, and Ralph D Freeman. The effects of contrast on visual orientation and spatial frequency discrimination: a comparison of single cells and behavior.Journal of neurophysiology, 57(3):773–786, 1987

    1987

  72. [72]

    Circuits and mechanisms for surround modulation in visual cortex

    Alessandra Angelucci, Maryam Bijanzadeh, Lauri Nurminen, Frederick Federer, Sam Merlin, and Paul C Bressloff. Circuits and mechanisms for surround modulation in visual cortex. Annual review of neuroscience, 40(1):425–451, 2017

    2017

  73. [73]

    Laminar subnetworks of response suppression in macaque primary visual cortex.Journal of Neuroscience, 40(39):7436–7450, 2020

    Tian Wang, Yang Li, Guanzhong Yang, Weifeng Dai, Yi Yang, Chuanliang Han, Xingyun Wang, Yange Zhang, and Dajun Xing. Laminar subnetworks of response suppression in macaque primary visual cortex.Journal of Neuroscience, 40(39):7436–7450, 2020. 24

    2020