pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.26966 · v1 · pith:AMMILAYYnew · submitted 2026-06-25 · 💰 econ.GN · q-fin.EC

Economic complexity at subnational level: A consistency analysis

Wenli Du , Andrea Zaccaria This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 01:48 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💰 econ.GN q-fin.EC
keywords economic complexitysubnational analysisconsistencyGDP per capitaemploymentnetwork measuresterritorial complexityexogenous computation
0
0 comments X

The pith

Standard economic complexity measures applied to subnational regions yield inconsistent product rankings that shift with geographical scale, while a new exogenous computation method produces stable estimates that align better with GDP per c

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

National-level economic complexity methods, when used on smaller territories, produce different complexity scores for identical products depending on the chosen scale of analysis such as regions versus cities. The paper identifies this inconsistency and proposes a territorial measure computed through an exogenous and extensive process independent of the data's aggregation level. This revised approach generates estimates that remain consistent when the scale changes and show stronger links to conventional economic performance metrics. Readers would value the finding if reliable subnational complexity data can support more accurate local economic assessments without scale-dependent artifacts.

Core claim

Applications of country-level economic complexity measures at the subnational level lead to inconsistent results, in the sense that the estimated complexity of the same product appears to depend on methodological details such as the geographical scale of analysis. A measure of territorial economic complexity based on an exogenous and extensive computation yields estimates that are more consistent and more strongly aligned with standard economic indicators such as GDP per capita and employment.

What carries the argument

The territorial economic complexity measure based on an exogenous and extensive computation, which removes dependence on the specific geographical scale chosen for the input data.

If this is right

  • Subnational complexity rankings can be compared across different levels of territorial aggregation without methodological artifacts.
  • Policy decisions that rely on complexity rankings at the regional or city level become less sensitive to the choice of data boundaries.
  • The measure supports tracking of economic diversification progress at subnational scales with greater reliability.
  • Correlations with GDP per capita and employment allow the complexity index to serve as a supplementary indicator alongside traditional output statistics.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The inconsistency problem may extend to other network-derived indices when applied below the national level, suggesting a general need for scale-independent computation methods.
  • Adoption could alter how development agencies rank and support subnational units based on revealed productive capabilities.
  • Testing the measure against additional outcomes such as patenting rates or wage growth would clarify whether the alignment with GDP is unique or part of a broader pattern.
  • The approach opens the possibility of consistent cross-border comparisons of subnational economies that cross national statistical boundaries.

Load-bearing premise

Consistency across different geographical scales and stronger correlation with GDP per capita and employment serve as the right criteria to judge a complexity measure as superior.

What would settle it

A direct computation in which the new measure still assigns substantially different complexity values to the same product when the underlying data is re-aggregated from one subnational scale to another.

read the original abstract

Several network-based measures have been proposed to assess the economic complexity of countries. These measures have provided important insights into national economic development, and they are now widely applied at the subnational level as well. Here, we show that such applications lead to inconsistent results, in the sense that the estimated complexity of the same product appears to depend on methodological details such as the geographical scale of analysis. Building on these findings, we propose a measure of territorial economic complexity based on an exogenous and extensive computation. We show that these methodological choices yield estimates that are more consistent and more strongly aligned with standard economic indicators, such as GDP per capita and employment.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper claims that standard network-based economic complexity measures applied at subnational scales produce inconsistent estimates, with the complexity of the same product varying by geographical aggregation level. It proposes an alternative territorial economic complexity measure computed via an exogenous and extensive procedure, asserting that this yields greater consistency across scales and stronger correlations with GDP per capita and employment than conventional approaches.

Significance. If the central claims hold after addressing the validation criteria, the work would identify a methodological limitation in extending national ECI methods to regions and offer a practical alternative with improved alignment to standard indicators, which could influence regional economics research and data construction practices.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the superiority claim for the new measure rests on consistency across geographical scales and stronger alignment with GDP per capita and employment, yet no derivation, citation, or comparison is supplied to establish why these two properties are the privileged validation criteria over alternatives such as predictive power for structural change, orthogonality to size, or fidelity to capability-based theory. This renders the superiority assertion dependent on unstated assumptions.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the inconsistency result is presented as a descriptive finding, but the manuscript does not quantify its magnitude (e.g., via variance statistics or cross-scale correlation matrices) or demonstrate that the proposed exogenous computation avoids the same dependence by construction rather than by post-hoc adjustment.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract introduces the phrase 'exogenous and extensive computation' without an accompanying definition or reference to the precise algorithmic steps; an early methods subsection would improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for these constructive comments. We address each point below and indicate where revisions will be made to improve clarity and rigor.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the superiority claim for the new measure rests on consistency across geographical scales and stronger alignment with GDP per capita and employment, yet no derivation, citation, or comparison is supplied to establish why these two properties are the privileged validation criteria over alternatives such as predictive power for structural change, orthogonality to size, or fidelity to capability-based theory. This renders the superiority assertion dependent on unstated assumptions.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit justification for the validation criteria would strengthen the paper. The criteria of cross-scale consistency and correlation with GDP per capita and employment are chosen because they directly test the robustness of subnational applications (the paper's central concern) and their alignment with widely used development indicators in the economic complexity literature. We will revise the abstract and add a short paragraph in the introduction deriving these choices, citing relevant prior work, and briefly contrasting them with alternatives such as predictive power for structural change. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the inconsistency result is presented as a descriptive finding, but the manuscript does not quantify its magnitude (e.g., via variance statistics or cross-scale correlation matrices) or demonstrate that the proposed exogenous computation avoids the same dependence by construction rather than by post-hoc adjustment.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the abstract presents the inconsistency finding at a high level. The full manuscript contains quantitative comparisons in the results, but we will add explicit magnitude metrics (variance statistics and cross-scale correlation matrices) to the abstract and a dedicated methods/results subsection for visibility. For the exogenous measure, we will expand the methods section to show that consistency arises by construction from the non-network, extensive computation procedure, which does not depend on scale-specific network aggregation; we will include supporting derivations or simulations to distinguish this from post-hoc adjustment. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected.

full rationale

The paper demonstrates that standard ECI measures produce scale-dependent product complexity values when applied subnationally, then introduces a new measure constructed via exogenous and extensive computation and reports that it improves cross-scale consistency plus correlation with GDP per capita and employment. No quoted equations, definitions, or self-citations reduce any claimed result to its own inputs by construction; the validation criteria are stated explicitly as the authors' chosen yardsticks rather than being smuggled in via prior self-citation or ansatz. The derivation chain therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review provides no information on free parameters, axioms, or invented entities.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5627 in / 1081 out tokens · 23216 ms · 2026-06-26T01:48:31.360408+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences106(26), 10570–10575 (2009)

    Hidalgo, C.A., Hausmann, R.: The building blocks of economic complexity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences106(26), 10570–10575 (2009)

    2009

  2. [2]

    Research Policy51(8), 104568 (2022)

    Balland, P.-A., Broekel, T., Diodato, D., Giuliani, E., Hausmann, R., o’Clery, N., Rigby, D.: The new paradigm of economic complexity. Research Policy51(8), 104568 (2022)

    2022

  3. [3]

    Technical report, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning

    Neffke, F., Sbardella, A., Schetter, U., Tacchella, A.: Economic complexity anal- ysis. Technical report, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning . . . (2024)

    2024

  4. [4]

    Journal of Economic Growth12(1), 1–25 (2007)

    Hausmann, R., Hwang, J., Rodrik, D.: What you export matters. Journal of Economic Growth12(1), 1–25 (2007)

    2007

  5. [5]

    National Institute Economic Review249, 47– 58 (2019)

    Bishop, A., Mateos-Garcia, J.: Exploring the link between economic complexity and emergent economic activities. National Institute Economic Review249, 47– 58 (2019)

    2019

  6. [6]

    Nature Reviews Physics3(2), 92–113 (2021)

    Hidalgo, C.A.: Economic complexity theory and applications. Nature Reviews Physics3(2), 92–113 (2021)

    2021

  7. [7]

    Diodato, D., Napolitano, L., Pugliese, E., Tacchella, A.: Handbook of economic complexity for policy (KJ-01-24-151-EN-N (online), KJ-01-24-151-EN-C (print)) (2024) https://doi.org/10.2760/9006857

    work page doi:10.2760/9006857 2024

  8. [8]

    Mit Press, ??? (2014)

    Hausmann, R., Hidalgo, C.A., Bustos, S., Coscia, M., Simoes, A.: The Atlas of Economic Complexity: Mapping Paths to Prosperity. Mit Press, ??? (2014)

    2014

  9. [9]

    Entropy20(11), 883 (2018)

    Sbardella, A., Pugliese, E., Zaccaria, A., Scaramozzino, P.: The role of complex analysis in modelling economic growth. Entropy20(11), 883 (2018)

    2018

  10. [10]

    Scientific Reports2(1), 723 (2012)

    Tacchella, A., Cristelli, M., Caldarelli, G., Gabrielli, A., Pietronero, L.: A new metrics for countries’ fitness and products’ complexity. Scientific Reports2(1), 723 (2012)

    2012

  11. [11]

    Structural Change and Economic Dynamics62, 231–246 (2022)

    Casta˜ neda, G., Pietronero, L., Romero-Padilla, J., Tacchella, A.: The complex dynamic of growth: Fitness and the different patterns of economic activity in the medium and long terms. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics62, 231–246 (2022)

    2022

  12. [12]

    PloS one10(2), 0117174 (2015) 22

    Cristelli, M., Tacchella, A., Pietronero, L.: The heterogeneous dynamics of economic complexity. PloS one10(2), 0117174 (2015) 22

    2015

  13. [13]

    Nature Physics14(8), 861–865 (2018)

    Tacchella, A., Mazzilli, D., Pietronero, L.: A dynamical systems approach to gross domestic product forecasting. Nature Physics14(8), 861–865 (2018)

    2018

  14. [14]

    PLOS ONE12(1), 0168540 (2017)

    Pugliese, E., Chiarotti, G.L., Zaccaria, A., Pietronero, L.: Complex economies have a lateral escape from the poverty trap. PLOS ONE12(1), 0168540 (2017)

    2017

  15. [15]

    Humanities and Social Sciences Communications11(1), 1–12 (2024)

    Ren, Z., Du, W., Zhao, Z., Zhao, L., Weng, T.: Strategies for selecting trad- ing partners based on economic complexity of international trade networks: A comparison between chinese and the us markets. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications11(1), 1–12 (2024)

    2024

  16. [16]

    Research Policy 52(9), 104863 (2023)

    Hidalgo, C.A.: The policy implications of economic complexity. Research Policy 52(9), 104863 (2023)

    2023

  17. [17]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.05272 (2017)

    Pietronero, L., Cristelli, M., Gabrielli, A., Mazzilli, D., Pugliese, E., Tacchella, A., Zaccaria, A.: Economic complexity:” buttarla in caciara” vs a constructive approach. arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.05272 (2017)

    work page arXiv 2017

  18. [18]

    Nature Communications11(1), 3352 (2020)

    Sciarra, C., Chiarotti, G., Ridolfi, L., Laio, F.: Reconciling contrasting views on economic complexity. Nature Communications11(1), 3352 (2020)

    2020

  19. [19]

    Scientific Data9(1), 628 (2022)

    Patelli, A., Pietronero, L., Zaccaria, A.: Integrated database for economic complexity. Scientific Data9(1), 628 (2022)

    2022

  20. [20]

    PloS one13(6), 0197616 (2018)

    Operti, F.G., Pugliese, E., Andrade Jr, J.S., Pietronero, L., Gabrielli, A.: Dynam- ics in the fitness-income plane: Brazilian states vs world countries. PloS one13(6), 0197616 (2018)

    2018

  21. [21]

    Scienze Regionali, 1–28

    Cattaruzzo, S., Cor` o, G., Maran, G.: When specialization leads to knowledge expansion: Linking industrial districts to economic complexity across italian regions. Scienze Regionali, 1–28

  22. [22]

    Scientific Reports 14(1), 11752 (2024)

    Aufiero, S., De Marzo, G., Sbardella, A., Zaccaria, A.: Mapping job fitness and skill coherence into wages: an economic complexity analysis. Scientific Reports 14(1), 11752 (2024)

    2024

  23. [23]

    The European Physical Journal Special Topics225(10), 1893–1911 (2016)

    Pugliese, E., Zaccaria, A., Pietronero, L.: On the convergence of the fitness- complexity algorithm. The European Physical Journal Special Topics225(10), 1893–1911 (2016)

    1911

  24. [24]

    Technological forecasting and social change120, 77–89 (2017)

    Ivanova, I., Strand, Ø., Kushnir, D., Leydesdorff, L.: Economic and technological complexity: A model study of indicators of knowledge-based innovation systems. Technological forecasting and social change120, 77–89 (2017)

    2017

  25. [25]

    Economic geography93(1), 1–23 (2017)

    Balland, P.-A., Rigby, D.: The geography of complex knowledge. Economic geography93(1), 1–23 (2017)

    2017

  26. [26]

    PloS one9(12), 113470 (2014)

    Cimini, G., Gabrielli, A., Sylos Labini, F.: The scientific competitiveness of 23 nations. PloS one9(12), 113470 (2014)

    2014

  27. [27]

    Regional Science Policy & Practice14(3), 575–599 (2022)

    Cınar, I.T., Korkmaz, I., Baycan, T.: Regions’ economic fitness and sectoral labor productivity: Evidence from turkey. Regional Science Policy & Practice14(3), 575–599 (2022)

    2022

  28. [28]

    Review of Regional Studies47(2), 201–219 (2017)

    Ch´ avez, J.C., Mosqueda, M.T., G´ omez-Zald´ ıvar, M.: Economic complexity and regional growth performance: Evidence from the mexican economy. Review of Regional Studies47(2), 201–219 (2017)

    2017

  29. [29]

    Research Policy (2019)

    Mau, K., Xu, M.: Economic growth and complexity across chinese regions: the role of cost-saving production diffusion. Research Policy (2019). Article in press

    2019

  30. [30]

    Regional Studies52(5), 715–726 (2018)

    Reynolds, C., Agrawal, M., Lee, I., Zhan, C., Li, J., Taylor, P., Roos, G.: A sub-national economic complexity analysis of australia’s states and territories. Regional Studies52(5), 715–726 (2018)

    2018

  31. [31]

    Journal of Regional Science 64(4), 1183–1204 (2024)

    Basile, R., Giallonardo, L., Girardi, A., Mantegazzi, D.: Access to credit and eco- nomic complexity: Evidence from italian provinces. Journal of Regional Science 64(4), 1183–1204 (2024)

    2024

  32. [32]

    Doctoral dissertation, Mae Fah Luang University, Learning Resources and Educational Media Centre (2024)

    Yeerong, P.: Application of machine learning for evaluating thailand’s economic complexity. Doctoral dissertation, Mae Fah Luang University, Learning Resources and Educational Media Centre (2024)

    2024

  33. [33]

    PSL Quarterly Review75(300), 47–79 (2022)

    Teixeira, F.O., Missio, F.J., Dathein, R.: Economic complexity, structural trans- formation and economic growth in a regional context: Evidence for brazil. PSL Quarterly Review75(300), 47–79 (2022)

    2022

  34. [34]

    Area Development and Policy6(1), 63–81 (2021)

    Herrera, W.D., Strauch, J.C., Bruno, M.A.: Economic complexity of brazilian states in the period 1997–2017. Area Development and Policy6(1), 63–81 (2021)

    1997

  35. [35]

    Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications492, 1591–1603 (2018)

    Gao, J., Zhou, T.: Quantifying china’s regional economic complexity. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications492, 1591–1603 (2018)

    2018

  36. [36]

    PLOS ONE12(9), 0182774 (2017)

    Sbardella, A., Pugliese, E., Pietronero, L.: Economic development and wage inequality: A complex system analysis. PLOS ONE12(9), 0182774 (2017)

    2017

  37. [37]

    Regional Studies55(7), 1299–1310 (2021)

    Fritz, B.S.L., Manduca, R.A.: The economic complexity of us metropolitan areas. Regional Studies55(7), 1299–1310 (2021)

    2021

  38. [38]

    Journal of Global Trade, Ethics and Law2(2024)

    Capoani, L., Martini, P.: The role of geographic and sectoral diversification, and the herfindahl-hirschman index: Insights from italian provinces and regions. Journal of Global Trade, Ethics and Law2(2024)

    2024

  39. [39]

    Science Advances5(1), 1705 (2019) 24

    Mealy, P., Farmer, J.D., Teytelboym, A.: Interpreting economic complexity. Science Advances5(1), 1705 (2019) 24

    2019

  40. [40]

    Revue ´ economique64(3), 495–503 (2013)

    Poncet, S., Waldemar, F.: Economic complexity and growth: Evidence from china. Revue ´ economique64(3), 495–503 (2013)

    2013

  41. [41]

    Technical Report 2531, Utrecht Univer- sity, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography (2025)

    Qiao, Y., Li, Y., Boschma, R.: Place dependence, industrial diversification, and economic performance of chinese cities. Technical Report 2531, Utrecht Univer- sity, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography (2025)

    2025

  42. [42]

    Nature Human Behaviour4(3), 248–254 (2020)

    Balland, P.-A., Jara-Figueroa, C., Petralia, S., Steijn, M.P.A., Rigby, D.L., Hidalgo, C.A.: Complex economic activities concentrate in large cities. Nature Human Behaviour4(3), 248–254 (2020)

    2020

  43. [43]

    Scientific Reports15(1), 39979 (2025)

    Ruan, X., Lin, S., Huang, J., Li, C.: The impact of economic complexity on green technology innovation in china. Scientific Reports15(1), 39979 (2025)

    2025

  44. [44]

    PLOS ONE15(8), 0238017 (2020)

    Chakraborty, A., Inoue, H., Fujiwara, Y.: Economic complexity of prefectures in japan. PLOS ONE15(8), 0238017 (2020)

    2020

  45. [45]

    Regional Studies 59(1) (2025)

    Dong, Z., Sun, S., Balland, P.-A., Zhang, W.: Environmental regulation promotes green technological diversification: Evidence from chinese cities. Regional Studies 59(1) (2025)

    2025

  46. [46]

    Papers in Regional Science103(1), 100011 (2024)

    Freitas, E., Britto, G., Amaral, P.: Related industries, economic complexity, and regional diversification: An application for brazilian microregions. Papers in Regional Science103(1), 100011 (2024)

    2024

  47. [47]

    Estudos Econˆ omicos (S˜ ao Paulo)54, 53575442 (2024)

    Smolski, F.M.d.S., Ruffoni, J., Mascarini, S.: The effect of economic complex- ity and relatedness on the economic growth of brazilian microregions. Estudos Econˆ omicos (S˜ ao Paulo)54, 53575442 (2024)

    2024

  48. [48]

    Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 100657 (2025)

    Ferraz, D., Carvalho, A.C.G., Polloni-Silva, E., Moraes, G.M.P., Moralles, H.F., Nascimento Rebelatto, D.A.: The role of foreign direct investment and regional absorptive capacity on economic complexity: A brazilian investigation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 100657 (2025)

    2025

  49. [49]

    Journal of Physics: Complexity4(2), 025011 (2023)

    Laudati, D., Mariani, M.S., Pietronero, L., Zaccaria, A.: The different structure of economic ecosystems at the scales of companies and countries. Journal of Physics: Complexity4(2), 025011 (2023)

    2023

  50. [50]

    PNAS Nexus3(3), 064 (2024)

    Diem, C., Borsos, A., Reisch, T., Kert´ esz, J., Thurner, S.: Estimating the loss of economic predictability from aggregating firm-level production networks. PNAS Nexus3(3), 064 (2024)

    2024

  51. [51]

    Science317(5837), 482–487 (2007)

    Hidalgo, C.A., Klinger, B., Barab´ asi, A.-L., Hausmann, R.: The product space conditions the development of nations. Science317(5837), 482–487 (2007)

    2007

  52. [52]

    arXiv preprint (2025) arXiv:2507.05846

    Russo, A., Scaramozzino, P., Zaccaria, A.: A job-based assessment of economic 25 complexity: from hidden to revealed. arXiv preprint (2025) arXiv:2507.05846

    work page arXiv 2025

  53. [53]

    revealed

    Balassa, B.: Trade liberalisation and “revealed” comparative advantage 1. The manchester school33(2), 99–123 (1965)

    1965

  54. [54]

    PloS one8(8), 70726 (2013)

    Cristelli, M., Gabrielli, A., Tacchella, A., Caldarelli, G., Pietronero, L.: Measuring the intangibles: A metrics for the economic complexity of countries and products. PloS one8(8), 70726 (2013)

    2013

  55. [55]

    Entropy20(10), 783 (2018) 26

    Servedio, V.D., Butt` a, P., Mazzilli, D., Tacchella, A., Pietronero, L.: A new and stable estimation method of country economic fitness and product complexity. Entropy20(10), 783 (2018) 26

    2018